SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS TO THE STRATEGIC POLICIES & … · Completions - 595 2,070 Pre-Adoption. Plan Period Year 2017/18 - 2018/19. Delivery Expectation - 392 941 First five years

MODIFICATION

NUMBERPOLICY NUMBER TEXT IN PUBLICATION VERSION PROPOSED AMENDMENT REASON FOR AMENDMENT

MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION

LIKELY TO RESULT IN SIGNFICANT CHANGES TO

THE SA

LIKELY TO RESULT IN SIGNFICANT CHANGES TO THE

HRA

SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS TO THE STRATEGIC POLICIES & LAND ALLOCATIONS DPD - CONSULTATION OCTOBER 2018)CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 4: STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

SPLA M11Strategic Objective

SO2Absent objective

Include new objective

Deliver and encourage new housing development in the district sufficient to deliver and

maintain a 5 year housing land supply

To provide greater clarity on purpose of objective SO2 MAIN No No


SO3

First Bullet Point:

'Respecting, conserving and enhancing the character,

setting and local distinctiveness of places, buildings

and landscapes through positive urban design and

siting of development and encouraging new

development to make a positive contributrion , in

order to retain the district's unique character and

identity; Maintaining and snhancing the character and

heritage of the district's settlements;'

Replace Bullet Point with the following text

'Respecting the character and local distinctiveness of places, buildings and landscapes

through carefully design and siting of development, and encouraging new development

to make a positive contribution, in order to retain the district's unique character and

identity;'

To provide greater clarity within the Strategic

Objectives and to align better with the District's

Heritage Strategy.

MAIN No No


SO3

Fifth Bullet Point

'Realising the tourism and visitor potential and

economic benefitsof the district's historic

environment, and ensuring that engagement with and

access to it are increased;'

Replace Bullet Point with the following text

'Realising the tourism and visitor potential and economic benefits of the district's historic

environment, and ensuring that engagement with, and access to, it are increased in a

sustainable manner.'

To provide greater clarity within the Strategic

Objectives and to align better with the District's

Heritage Strategy.

MAIN No No


SO4N/A

To include a further objective which relates to air quality which reads:

'Working to reduce levels of air pollution within the district, particularly in the designated

Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) of Lancaster City Centre, Carnforth Town

Centre and Galgate and other major transport corridors within the district.'

To provide consistency with out policies contained

within the Local Plan (both the Strategic Policies &

Land Allocations DPD and Development

Management DPD.

MAIN No No

CHAPTER 5: KEY DIAGRAM

SPLA M15 Key Diagram New references to be added. References to be added to the Key Diagram which identify the neighbouring authorities. To provide further clarity within the diagram. MAIN No No

CHAPTER 6: PRESUMPTION IN FAVOUR OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 7: THE ROLE AND FUNCTION OF OUR TOWNS AND VILLAGES

SPLA M21 Policy SP2

4. Rural Villages - these settlements will

accommodate development that meets evidenced

local needs only.

4. Rural Villages - these settlements will accommodate development that meets

evidenced local needs only. Development in these villages should only result in infilling

and the rounding-off of the settlement.

To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M23 Policy SP2

This will ensure that the protected landscape

designation in these areas will be given significant

consideration in accordance with national planning

guidance.

Amend sentence to read:

This will ensure that the protected landscape designation in these areas will be given

significant consideration in accordance with national planning guidance.

This will ensure that only development that can be accomodated without harm to the

AONB's primary purpose (insert footnote from National Parks and Access to the

Countryside Act 1949; confirmed by Section 82 of the Countryside and

Rights of Way Act 2000 which outlines the primary purpose) will be permitted,

recognising that appropriately located and designed development can contribute to

conserving and enhancing the landscape and settlement character.'

To provide clarity MAIN No No

SPLA M25 Policy SP3Additional paragraph to be included following

paragraph 7.18

Additional paragraph to read:

The development strategic ensures that only development that can be accommodated

without the harm to the AONBs primary purpose (to conserve and enhance the natural

beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the area) will be permitted, whilst maintaining a

positive approach, recognising that appropriately located and designed development can

contribute to conserving and enhancing the landscape and settlement character,

including where opportunities for regeneration and redevelopment to be delivered.

To provide greater clarity. MAIN No No

CHAPTER 8: ECONOMIC GROWTH

SPLA M28 Policy SP5

Final Paragraph

The development of these sites will seek to deliver

approximately 48.9 hectares of new employment land

and provide opportunities for the creation of new

jobs in a variety and range of economic sectors as

identified both with the Employment Land Review

and the Lancashire Economic Partnerships' Strategic

Economic Plan (SEP).

Final Paragraph

The development of these sites will seek to deliver approximately 48.9 hectares of new

employment land and will provide opportunitiesTo facilitate and support opportunities

for economic growth across the Plan period, the Local Plan seeks to allocate 59.5

hectares of employment land to provide for the creation of new jobs in a variety and

range of economic sectors identified within the Lancaster District Employment and

Review, the 'Acheiving Economic Potential for Lancaster District' Report and the

Lancashire Economic Partnerships' Strategic Economic Plan (SEP).

To provide further clarity within the Policy. MAIN No No

CHAPTER 9: HOUSING

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M29 Policy SP6

First Sentence

Paragraph 47 of the Framework places a

responsibility on every local planning authority to

plan for their full objectively assessed housing need.

This is achieved by identifying an Objectively Assessed

Need figure (OAN) for housing and then exploring

opportunities available to deliver it through planning

policy. The OAN is determined using nationally

applicable guidance to consider a wide range of

evidence on demographics, economic potential and

local housing market circumstances to arrive at a

recommended level that would allow the needs

arising from both demographic change and a growing

economy to be realised. The recommendation

informs the basis of a specific housing requirement

which is established within the Local Plan.

Paragraph 47 65 of the National Planning Policy Framework places a responsibility on

every local planning authority to establish a housing requirement figure for the whole

area, which shows the extent to which their identified need (and any needs that cannot

be met within neighbouring areas) can be met over the plan period. Within this overall

requirement, strategic policies should also set out a housing requirement for designated

neighbourhood plan areas which reflect the overall strategy for the patter and scale of

development and any relevant allocations. plan for their full objectively assessed housing

need. This is achieved by identifying an Objectively Assessed Need figure (OAN) for

housing and then exploring opportunities available to deliver it through planning policy.

The OAN is determined using nationally applicable guidance to consider a wide range of

evidence on demographics, economic potential and local housing market circumstances

to arrive at a recommended level that would allow the needs arising from both

demographic change and a growing economy to be realised. The recommendation

informs the basis of a specific housing requirement which is established within the Local

Plan.

To reflect updates to national planning policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M30 Policy SP6

Policy SP6 establishes what the Council consider to be

a deliverable and realistic housing requirement in the

distirct. Through Policy SP6 the Local Plan sets out

how the Council will seek to deliver just over 12,000

new dwellings over the period 2011 / 2012 to

2033/34, 3 years post the official plan period of

2031/32 and equivalent to an annual requirement of

522 dwellings per annum. An additional 3 years of

supply has been included post adoption to ensure

that the Plan meets the requirements to plan for a

full 15 years following adoption. This means that in

housing delivery terms the plan will cover a period of

Policy SP6 establishes what the Council consider to be a deliverable and realistic housing

requirement in the distirct. Through Policy SP6 the Local Plan sets out how the Council

will seek to deliver just over 12,000 9,000 new dwellings over the period 2011 / 2012 to

2030 3/31 4, 3 years post the official plan period of 2031/32 and equivalent to an annual

requirement of 455 522 dwellings per annum. The accompanying housing trajectory set

out in Appendix E of this DPD identifies Aa n additional 3 years of supply has been

included post adoption to ensure that the Plan meets the requirements to plan for a full

15 years following adoption. The 455 dwelling per annum figure has been rolled forward

to cover the 15 year NPPF period. Th is means that in housing delivery terms the plan will

cover a period of 23 years.

To update the plan in relation to reflect evidence and

provide consistency with the wider Local Plan.MAIN No No

SPLA M32 Policy SP6

Table 9.1

Pre-Adoption. Plan Period Year 2011/12 - 2016/17.

Completions - 2,070

Pre-Adoption. Plan Period Year 2017/18 - 2018/19.

Delivery Expectation 941

First five years post adoption. Plan Period Year

2019/20 - 2023/24. Delivery Expectation 3,733

Years 6-10 post adoption. Plan Period Year 2024/25 -

2028/29. Delivery Expectation 2,857

Years 11-15 post adoption. Plan Period Year 2029/30 -

2033/34. Delivery Expectation 2,455

Table 9.1

Pre-Adoption. Plan Period Year 2016 1/17 2 - 2018 6/19 7. Completions - 595 2,070

Pre-Adoption. Plan Period Year 2017/18 - 2018/19. Delivery Expectation - 392 941

First five years post adoptionPost adoption to 2030/31 . Plan Period Year 2019/20 -

2030 23/31 24. Delivery Expectation - 6,391 3,733

Years 6-10 post adoptionAdditional 3 years post adoption . Plan Period Year

2031 24/3225 - 2033 28/34 29. Delivery Expectation - 1.255 2,857

Years 11-15 post adoption. Plan Period Year 2029/30 - 2033/34. Delivery Expectation

2,455

Total. 12,056

To provide further clarity on this matter. MAIN No No

SPLA M33 Policy SP6 Additional paragraph to follow Table 9.2

New paragraph to read

Allowing for a 20% lapse rate on small site delivery and an allowance for demolitions and

change of use the expected delivery within the Local Plan period is reduced to 9,124

dwellings. It is on this basis that the future housing requirement for the district has been

calculated.


SPLA M34 Policy SP6

The Council are comfortable that the allocation of

land within the Local Plan will lead to a wide range of

opportunities for development which will more than

sufficiently provide for housing delivery within the

first five years of the plan…

The Council are comfortable that the allocation of land within the Local Plan will lead to a

wide range of opportunities for development which will more than sufficiently provide

for housing delivery within the first five years of the plan…

To provide consistency with national planning policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M35 Policy SP6 New paragraph to be added following paragraph 9.23

New paragraph to read:

In line with national planning guidance, the Council have sought to provide certainty over

the scale of housing growth which is expected to be delivered (as a minimum) in

neighbourhood plan areas. The scale of growth identified should be preferably acheived

through the preparation of positively prepared and proactive neighbourhood plans,

however in the absence of a neighbourhood plan this will be achieved via the decision-

making process.

The figures provided in Policy SP6 have been provided in the context of the Council's

Strategic Housing and Employment Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA),

consideration of recent growth within the neighbourhood plan area, physical constraints

which may affect growth potential and the settlements position in the settlement

hierarchy. The figures provided represent a minimum 'starting point' expectation and

should be boosted by further growth where it represents sustianable development and is

in accordance with relevant national and local planning policy.

To reflect updates to national planning guidance. MAIN No No

SPLA M37 Policy SP6

First Paragraph

Between 2011/12 and 2033/34 the Council will seek

to deliver a net minimum delivery of 522 new

dwellings per annum over a 23 year delivery period,

equivalent to 12,000 new dwellings.

First Paragraph

Between 2011/12 and 2030 3/31 4 the Council will seek to deliver a net minimum delivery

of 455 522 new dwellings per annum over a 20 3 year delivery plan period, equivalent to

9,100 12,000 new dwellings.

To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M38 Policy SP6New paragraph to be added following the first

paragraph of the policy.

Beyond the Plan period the 455 dwelling per annum figure has been rolled forward to

cover a longer delivery period of 23 years.To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

SPLA M39 Policy SP6

Reference in the Housing Table

SG1 - Bailrigg Garden Village - No of Dwellings 3,500 -

No of Dwellings Anticipated in the Plan Period - 1,655


SG1 - Bailrigg Garden Village - Total No of Dwellings 3,500 - No of Dwellings Anticipated

in the Plan Period - 460 1,655


SPLA M40 Policy SP6


SG8 - East Lancaster Strategic Site - No of Dwellings

900 - No of Dwellings Anticipated in the Plan Period -

900


SG7 8 - East Lancaster Strategic Site - Total No of Dwellings 92500 - No of Dwellings

Anticipated in the Plan Period - 475 900


SPLA M41 Policy SP6


SG10 - North Lancaster Strategic Site - No of

Dwellings 700 - No of Dwellings Anticipated in the

Plan Period - 700


SG9 10 - North Lancaster Strategic Site - Total No of Dwellings 700 - No of Dwellings

Anticipated in the Plan Period - 495 700


SPLA M43 Policy SP6


SG14 - Land South of Windermere Road, Carnforth -

No of Dwellings 500 - No of Dwellings Anticipated in

the Plan Period - 500


SG12 14 - Land South of Windermere Road, Carnforth - Total No of Dwellings 500 - No of

Dwellings Anticipated in the Plan Period - 225 500


SPLA M44 Policy SP6


Total Strategic Site Contribution through the Plan

Period - 3,955


Total Strategic Site Contribution through the Plan Period - 1,855 3,955To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

SPLA M45 Policy SP6Reference in the Housing Table

H1-H9 - Non strategic site delivery - 1,241


H1-H6 9 - Non Strategic site delivery - 1,312 1,241To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No


DOS1-DOS11 - Development Opportunities - 925


DOS1-DOS11 - Development Opportunities - 776 - 481 925To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No


Non-Allocated Sites with Permissions - 1,679


Non-Allocated Sites with Permissions - 749 1,679To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No


Student Accomodation - 1,407


Student Accomodation - 2,119 1,407To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

SPLA M49 Policy SP6


Additional Supply including Neighbourhood Plan

Delivery Expectations - 1,385


Additional Supply including Neighbourhood Plan Delivery Expectations - 1,385

Windfall Sites - 140



Completions 2011/12 - 2015/16 - 1,442


Completions 2011/12 - 2017 5/18 6 - 2,595 1,442To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

SPLA M51 Policy SP6 New reference to be added to the Housing table 20% Small Site Lapse Rate - -120 To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

SPLA M52 Policy SP6 New reference to be added to the Housing table Allowance for Demolition and Change of Use - -100 To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No


Total - 12,056


Total - 9,158 12,056To provide greater clarity within the DPD. MAIN No No

SPLA M54 Policy SP6New paragraph to be added following the Housing

Table in Policy SP6

In order to provide clarity over housing delivery in neighbourhood plan areas the

following indicative housing figures have been provided, these should be considered to

be minimum figures for delivery of housing. Further growth should be supported where it

meets national and local planning policy and represents sustainable development.

To provide greater clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M55 Policy SP6Insert new table into Policy SP6 in relation to

Neighbourhood Plan areas.

Aldcliffe-with-Stodday Neighbourhood Plan - 0*

Carnforth Neighbourhood Plan - 0**

Caton-with-Littledale Neighbourhood Plan - 40

Cockerham Neighbourhood Plan - 0***

Dolphinholme Neighbourhood Plan - 0*

Halton-with-Aughton Neighbourhood Plan - 0***

Morecambe Neighbourhood Plan - 0****

Slyne-with-Hest Neighbourhood Plan - 40

Wennington Neighbourhood Plan - 0*

Wray-with-Botton Neighbourhood Plan - 25

Total Neighbourhood Plan Contributions - 105

To provide greater clarity within the DPD and to

reflect national planning guidance.MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M56 Policy SP6Further points of clarification to be added below the

Table within Policy SP6.

* Neighbourhood Plans in non-sustainable settlements have not been provided with an

indicative housing figure and any allocations for housing made should be of a small-scale

to meet defined local needs.

** Strategic Allocations have already been made for Carnforth, any further growth in the

Carnforth area should seek to best utilise land within the main urban area of the

settlement.

***The Local Plan has sought to formalise a range of planning approvals within the

Halton-with-Aughton and Cockerham Neighbourhood Plan areas which will deliver

sufficient growth in the area over the course of the plan period. Neighbourhood Plans

should seek to focus any future allocations on meeting local needs only.

****Due to the constrained nature of the Morecambe Neighbourhood Plan area

proposals for housing should consider regeneration and renewal of existing residential

units.


CHAPTER 10: THE NATURAL AND HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT

SPLA M59 Policy SP7Further bullet points to be added following the new

paragraph.

• Extensive evidence for prehistoric activity, with settlement remains and field systems in the

eastern uplands, and defended enclosures such as Warton Crag; • Major Roman sites such as the

forts at Lancaster, and Over Burrow, with a network of roads and civilian settlements, and

industrial sites such as the Quernmore pottery kilns; • Evidence of Dark Age and early medieval

activity in the eastern uplands and at St Patrick’s Chapel, Heysham, with its rock-cut graves; •

Motte and bailey castles along the Lune Valley, attesting to the Norman conquest of the area, and

later medieval fortifications, including those at Lancaster, Halton, Hornby, Melling, Arkholme and

Whittington. • Medieval ecclesiastical sites such as Cockersand Abbey and Lancaster Priory, and

many village churches of similar dates; • Remaining historic agricultural structures which have

shaped the character of our rural areas and provide evidence of earlier farming practices and

innovation; • Remnants of the district’s industrial heritage including the Lancaster Canal, Glasson

Dock, Lune Aqueduct, railway heritage, including the internationally significant former Carnforth

Motive Power Depot, warehouses, mills and other significant buildings, including those associated

with the smaller industries of furniture and stained glass manufacture and brewing; • Evidence of

the district’s maritime heritage, and the significant role it played in international trade, including

the river frontage, Custom House and warehouses of St George’s Quay, Sunderland Point and

Glasson Dock, Lancaster’s ‘outport’. • Evidence of Lancaster’s role as the regional centre of mental

healthcare provision throughout the C19 and early C20, with significant buildings such as Standen

Park House, the Moor Hospital, including Ridge Lea, and the Royal Albert Hospital. • Evidence of

Lancaster’s great military associations, and home of the King’s Own Regiment, including the White

Cross Barracks, former Bowerham Barracks (now University of Cumbria campus) and Westfield

Memorial Village. • Significant educational buildings which reflect the development of the

education system of this country, but also demonstrate some of the finest architecture, including

the Lancaster Royal Grammar School, Lancaster Girl’s Grammar School, Ripley St Thomas School,

The Storey Institute and Morecambe’s former Art and Technical School. • Key cultural assets

encompassing designed landscapes, including public parks and cemeteries, museums, assembly

rooms, theatres, libraries, and commemorative structures, such as war memorials, the Queen

Victoria Memorial and the Ashton Memorial, and the seaside heritage of Morecambe. • The C18

and early C19 townhouses, many of which are very much in-tact in Lancaster, • The extensive

network of tightly enclosed streets, backstreets and ginnels in the City as well as the few remaining

yards or courts, such as Swan Court, where the poorest housing tended to be found, packed in and

accessed through arches off main streets. • Buildings associated with Lancaster’s significant role as

the host of the Assize Court from C16 until 1975, including the Castle and Judges’ Lodgings. • The

high quality civic and institutional buildings such as the Old and New Town Halls.

To provide further clarity to this matter. MAIN No No

SPLA M60 Policy SP7 Replace existing policy text of SP7 with new wording.

New wording to read:

Lancaster district has an extraordinarily rich and varied historic environment which are

described in more detail through this Chapter of the Plan. The heritage assets within the

district have all played a major role in helping to shape the district’s distinctive identity.

The Council recognises the features which make the district special, and has produced a

district-wide Heritage Strategy which will help inform the evolving evidence base for the

Local Plan. The Local Plan will be used as the vehicle to proactively manage the historic

environment, protect it from inappropriate development and explore opportunities to

improve and enhance the significance, character, appearance and archaeological value

of Lancaster’s heritage assets and their setting.

The Council will also explore opportunities to maximise wider public benefits and

reinforce Lancaster’s unique identity through the promotion, understanding,

interpretation and enjoyment of the District’s historic environment.

To strengthen policy wording and provide more local

focus to the policy.MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M61 Policy SP7Additional paragraph and bullet points to be added

following paragraph 10.8

As well as fulfilling its statutory obligations, the Council will:

a) Seek to identify, protect and enhance local heritage assets;

b) Promote heritage-led regeneration including in relation to development opportunities

in the City Centre;

c) Produce and review conservation area appraisals and management plans;

d) Develop a positive strategy to safeguard the future of heritage assets at risk;

e) Adopt a proactive approach utilising development opportunities to increase the

promotion and understanding of the District’s archaeology; and

a)f) Regularly review the district Heritage Strategy.

To strengthen policy wording and provide more local

focus to the policy.MAIN No No

CHAPTER 11: INFRASTRUCTURE

CHAPTER 12: BAILRIGG GARDEN VILLAGE

SPLA M68 N/AChapter 12 title should be amended from:

12. Bailrigg Garden Village

Chapter 12 should be amended to read:

12. Lancaster South Broad Location of Growth (Inc. Bailrigg Garden Village)To provide consistency with the wider Local Plan. MAIN No No

SPLA M71 Policy SG1A new paragraph to be added following paragraph

12.1.

The Framework also states that the supply of large numbers of new homes can

sometimes be best achieved through planning for larger scale development, such as new

settlements or significant extensions to existing villages or towns. This is provided that

they are well located and designed and supported by the necessary infrastructure and

facilities. Paragraph 72 of the National Planning Policy Framework highlights that

working with the local community and other authorities where appropriate, local

planning authorities should identify suitable locations for such development considering

the following matters:

Consider the opportunities presented by existing or planned investment in infrastructure

or the areas economic potenital;

Ensure that their size and location will support a sustainable community, with sufficient

access to services and emplyoment opportunities within the development itself;

Set clear expectations for the quality of development and how this can be maintained

(such as by following Garden Village principles) and ensure that a variety of homes will

be provided to meet local needs;

Make a realistic assessment of likely rates of delivery; and

Consider whether it is appropriate to establish Green Belt around or adjoining new

development.


SPLA M72 Policy SG1

Given the status of the Garden Village, the Council

will expect that new development for both residential

and commercial uses seek to achieve higher

standards of construction and design. Whilst

achieving positive design and construction is a basic

expectation of all new development regardless of

location, in the case of the Garden Village the Council

has greater expectations given the opportunities to

create a new, self-contained, settlement.

Given the status of the Garden Village, the Council will expect that new development for

both residential and commercial uses seek to achieve higher standards of construction

and design. Whilst achieving positive design and construction is a basic expectation of all

new development regardless of location, in the case of the Garden Village the Council has

greater expectations given the opportunities to create a new, self-contained, settlement.

To reduce repetition within the Policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M74 Policy SG1

The most significant element of infrastructure will be

the delivery of new strategic infrastructure to

facilitate new growth, this is described in Policy SG4

of this DPD and will be addressed in more detail via

the preparaiton of the Bailrigg Garden Village Action

Plan DPD. It is important that necessary infrastructure

which is both local and strategic in nature is delivered

in the right place, at the right time, to ensure that

development can be achieved in a sustainable

manner for the benefit of new and existing residents

The most significant element of infrastructure will be the delivery of new strategic

infrastructure to facilitate new growth, this is described in Policy SG4 of this DPD and will

be addressed in more detail via the preparaiton of the Bailrigg Garden Village Action Plan

DPD. It is important that necessary infrastructure which is both local and strategic in

nature is delivered in the right place, at the right time, to ensure that development can be

achieved in a sustainable manner for the benefit of new and existing residents and local

businesses. Planning for necessary infrastructure should start during the preparation of

the Bailrigg Garden Village Area Action Plan DPD.

To avoid repetition. The paragraph seeks to duplicate

text which exists in paragraphs 12.33 to 12.41.MAIN No No

SPLA M75 Policy SG1Policy title for SG1

Broad Location of Growth - Bailrigg Garden Village

Re-title Policy SG1 to read:

Lancaster South Broad Location of Growth (Inc. Bailrigg Garden Village)

To better reflect development growth aspirations

contained within the plan.MAIN No No

SPLA M76 Policy SG1

First Paragraph

The Council has identified a broad location for growth

for Bailrigg Garden Village on the Local Plan Policies

Maps.

First Paragraph

The Council has identified a broad location for growth for in South Lancaster, including

development of Bailrigg Garden Village, on the Local Plan Policies Maps.

To better reflect development growth aspirations

contained within the plan.MAIN No No

SPLA M78 Policy SG1

Key Principles of the Garden Village

The Council has defined a range of principles which

will be at the heart of planning and development for

the Garden Village, these include:

Key Principles of the Garden Village

The Council has defined a range of principles which will be at the heart of planning and

development for the Garden Village very core of the planning and develoment for the

Garden Village which will be explored in more detail via the forthcoming Development

Plan Document (DPD) for this area. , tThese princples include

To provide further clarity in relation to the Bailrigg

Garden Village Area Action Plan DPD.MAIN No No

SPLA M79 Policy SG1Further point to be added to the key principles of

SG1.

Further point to be added to the key principles:

Seek to encourage sustainable economic growth within the Garden Village to create new

jobs, investment and economic opportunity.

To address an omission in the policy in relation to

boosting economic growth.MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M81 Policy SG1

Mechanism for Delivery of the Garden Village

The Council will prepare and implement a specific

Development Plan Document (DPD) for this area of

growth, entitled the 'Bailrigg Garden Village Area

Action Plan DPD'. As a result development in this area

will be delivered in accordance with this Area Action

Plan and the Council will not support piecemeal

development of this area (beyond existing planning

commitments) in advance of the preparation of this

Mechanism for Delivery of the Garden Village

The Council will prepare and implement a specific Development Plan Document (DPD) for

this area of growth, entitled the 'Bailrigg Garden Village Area Action Plan DPD'. Following

the completion of this DPD the content of Policy SG1 will be superseded. As a result

Development in this area will be delivered in accordance with this Area Action Plan and

the Council will not support piecemeal development of this area (beyond existing

planning commitments) in advance of the preparation of this DPD.

To provide greater clarity in relation to the Bailrigg


SPLA M82 Policy SG1The purpose of the forthcoming DPD will be as

follows:

The purpose of the forthcoming DPD will be as follows to address matters of financing,

delivery and the phasing new development and infrastructure. Key issues to address

include:



SPLA M83 Policy SG2

First Paragraph

The Council will support the development of a high

quality Innovation Campus in the South Lancaster

area that provides strong linkages…

First Paragraph

The Council will support the development of a high quality Innovation Campus in the

South Lancaster area for a range of knowledge-based and research businesses that

provides strong linkages…


SPLA M86 Policy SG2

Criterion VIII

…proposal will deal with the matter of flood risk,

particularly in relaiton to the Ou Beck watercourse.

This should include…

Criterion VIII

…proposal will deal with the matter of flood risk, particularly in relaiton to the Ou Beck

watercourse and the surface water issues across the site . This should include…


SPLA M87 Policy SG3

Second Paragraph

As stated in Policy SG1 of this DPD, it is the Council's

intention to prepare a specific DPD for the delivery of

the Garden Village (the Bailrigg Garden Village Area

Action Plan DPD) which will address the delivery of

infrastructure and facilitate development. The

forthcoming DPD will address matters relating to

financing and delivery, the phasing of new

infrastructure and its specific location.

Second Paragraph

As stated in Policy SG1 of this DPD, it is the Council's intention to prepare a specific DPD

for the delivery of the Garden Village (the Bailrigg Garden Village Area Action Plan DPD)

which will address the delivery of infrastructure and facilitate development. The

forthcoming DPD will address matters relating to financing and delivery, the phasing of

new infrastructure and its specific location.

As with Policy SG1, it is anticipated that this policy will be superseded upon the

completion of the Lancaster South Area Action Plan DPD which will deal with the matters

of infrastructure funding, delivery and phasing in full.



SPLA M88 Policy SG3

Bullet Point 1:

The reservation and management of land to

appropriately manage water, provide flood mitigation

and provide for new habitats for wildlife.

Bullet Point 1:

The reservation and management of land to approppriately manage ensure the effective

management of water , provide flood mitigation and provide for new habitats for

wildlife.


SPLA M90 Policy SG3

Final Bullet Point:

The provision of sufficient public open space to fully

meet the amenity and recreational needs of the

residents in the Garden Village.

Final Bullet Point:

The provision of sufficient public open space to fully meet the amenity and recreational

needs of the residents in the Garden Village.

To remove repetition. Matters of open space are

dealt with in Policy SG1.MAIN No No

CHAPTER 13: CENTRAL LANCASTER

SPLA M97 Policy SG5To delete all justification text relating to Policy SG5

and replace with the new suggested text.Delete paragraphs 13.13 to 13.20

Given the changing position of the Canal Quarter, the

changes to ownership and direction of

redevelopment due to the break-up of the Developer

Partnership with British Land, it was considered

necessary to completely re-shape the justification

text relating to this site.

MAIN No No

SPLA M98 Policy SG5 New paragraph 13.13

Canal Quarter, Central Lancaster

The Council will continue to support proposals for the regeneration of land at the Canal

Quarter site in Central Lancaster, encouraging the expansion of the City’s retail, leisure

and cultural offer to both local residents and visitors. Improvements in the Canal Quarter

will provide the opportunity to enhance Lancaster’s role as a sub-regional centre in

accordance with Policy TC1 of this DPD. This growth is considered to be essential to

enable the district to retain and attract the workforce, students and visitors it needs to

sustainable economic growth.







MAIN No No


The principles of redevelopment and regeneration at the Canal Quarter site (formerly

referred to as the Canal Corridor North) have been widely accepted via previous planning

decisions. Importantly during the 2009 Public Inquiry into regeneration of the Canal

Corridor the Secretary of State acknowledged that there was no available and

sequentially preferable site (or combination of sites) which could accommodate the

levels of town centre growth of the scale proposed, even if disaggregated (paragraph 16

of the Secretary of State’s decision). Whilst the composition and delivery of any future

scheme may now be different (in terms of the uses proposed and the way it is phased)

the scale of the regeneration project will remain the same and therefore the Council is

comfortable that the Canal Quarter site, as identified under Policy SG5 of this DPD,

remains the sequentially preferable location to deliver opportunities for comprehensive

regeneration and improvements to the city centre.







MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA


The Local Plan will seek to support a flexible range of uses on the Canal Quarter site

where they boost the existing role and function on the City Centre. Suitable uses for this

area will include an appropriate mix of both comparison and convenience retailing which

seeks to complement the existing offer, cultural uses which complement and improve the

existing facilities at the Dukes and Grand Theatres and commercial leisure uses, in

particular placing a greater emphasis on growing the food and drink offer within the City

Centre. Residential development will also be supported in the Canal Quarter for student

accommodation (as described in paragraph 13.21) and wider market housing.







MAIN No No


The Canal Quarter is expected to be a place where people can live, work and enjoy their

spare time, therefore redevelopment of the site for employment / business purposes,

particularly where they support the emerging economic growth sectors defined in the

Council’s Economic Strategy will be supported. In particular the Council will support the

creation of small business spaces for digital creative industries.







MAIN No No

SPLA M102 Policy SG5 New Paragraph 13.17

The redevelopment of the Canal Quarter area will result in the regeneration of a

significant area of land to the east of the city centre which will, in due course, expand the

boundaries of Lancaster City Centre. The Council are clear that proposals for the Canal

Quarter should seek to complement existing offers provided in the wider centre and

should not seek to compete with, or detract from, existing businesses, retailers or

cultural / leisure offer within the City Centre.







MAIN No No


Development in the Canal Quarter should come forward in line with a Development

Framework for the site, which will be prepared as a Supplementary Planning Document

(SPD) to support the policy direction provided in SG5 of this DPD. It is the intention of this

Development Framework to ensure that the regeneration of the Canal Quarter can be

achieved in a phased manner which provides flexibility and adaptability to how

development can evolve in this area.







MAIN No No


Any proposals must ensure that it integrates positively with the existing city centre in

order to attract users of the City Centre to the Canal Quarter and vice-versa. The Council

therefore expect proposals to incorporate good linkages for pedestrians, in particular an

appropriate crossing of the Lancaster City Centre gyratory. Proposals should contribute

towards improving the pedestrian environment within Lancaster City Centre, supporting

the direction of the Lancaster District Highways and Transport Masterplan, in promoting

strong linkages around the City Centre and into the City Centre from surrounding

residential areas.







MAIN No No


As described in Policy SG4, Lancaster City Centre is evolving into a hub for public

transport, with the delivery of a new bus rapid transit system which will connect Bailrigg

Garden Village, Central Morecambe and Heysham and the growth areas in East Lancaster

and North Lancaster with the City Centre. The regeneration of the Canal Quarter must

ensure that connectivity to and from these public transport nodes is achieved in such a

way which promotes its use and increases pedestrian footfall in and around the City

Centre.







MAIN No No


The City Centre is home to an ever increasing number of students from Lancaster

University and the University of Cumbria and students have an important role in

maintaining a healthy and vibrant City Centre. The regeneration of the Canal Quarter

provides the opportunity to provide a greater presence for Lancaster University and

improve the links between the areas of higher education and the City as a whole. The

Council will seek to support a greater presence of the Universities in the City Centre

through the provision of the creation of new cultural, educational and leisure facilities

which improve the overall offer within the centre.







MAIN No No


Whilst the Council will continue to support the growth of student accommodation,

recognising the most preferable locations for such uses are either on campus itself or

within the City Centre, consideration will be given to the needs for further growth in the

future in light of the significant permissions which have been given in recent years. The

Council will seek to work in partnership with both Lancaster University and the University

of Cumbria to investigate demand and opportunities for student accommodation within

the Canal Quarter Scheme.







MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA


The Canal Quarter site involves the regeneration of an area which, in places, has

significant historic value. The site includes a number of historic local buildings which,

where it is appropriate and possible to do so, should be retained through the

regeneration process. The Council has undertaken a heritage assessment of the historic

assets found within the Canal Quarter area, the findings and recommendations of this

assessment work should underpin future development proposals.







MAIN No No


Developers and agents for this site will be expected to work both the City Council and

Historic England to consider the most important aspects of the historic environment to

be retained as part of their planning application and should have due regard to the

relevant policies of the Development Management DPD.







MAIN No No


The regeneration of the Canal Quarter presents a significant opportunity for a

generational change to the function and role of Lancaster City Centre. However, it is

important that the regeneration of this area seeks to benefit the City Centre as a whole,

in particular ensuring that the existing businesses and retailers also see benefits and

improvements arising from the regeneration of the Canal Quarter.







MAIN No No


In order to achieve this, and to clearly define how such benefits will be delivered, the

Council will seek to promote such improvements through the preparation of a Town

Centre Strategy which will be prepared in collaboration with key City Centre

stakeholders. The strategy will set out a positive and proactive approach towards

regeneration, improvement and renewal, building on the sucesses of recent projects such

as ‘Square Routes’ and ‘Beyond the Castle’ to ensure that the benefits which arise from

the regeneration of the Canal Quarter, particularly in terms of investment and footfall,

are to be shared through the whole City Centre.







MAIN No No

SPLA M112 Policy SG5 To delete Policy SG5 and to replace with new text.

To delete Policy SG5 and to replace with new text.

Due to the comprehensive nature of this suggested modification these changes

proposed are not highlighted in this modification list but can be viewed in the

accompanying tracked-changed Strategic Policies & Land Allocations DPD.





necessary to completely re-shape the policy text

relating to this site.

MAIN YesUnlikely, but would need to review wording

changes

SPLA M114 Policy SG6

Quay Meadow and Vicarage Field - First Paragraph

Furthermore, the Council will continue to improve

urban green spaces around Lancaster Castle and

down to St Georges Quay via the 'Beyond the Castle'

project.

Quay Meadow and Vicarage Field - First Paragraph

Furthermore, the Council will continue to improve urban green spaces around Lancaster

Castle and down to St Georges Quay via the 'Beyond the Castle' project seeking financial

contributions to such improvements where appropriate .


CHAPTER 14: EAST LANCASTER


Criterion II

The relocation of Lansil Golf Club (and associated

facilities) to a satisfactory and appropriate locaiton to

secure their long-term future.

Criterion II

The development should be appropriately phased including the relocation of Lansil Golf

Club (and associated facilities) to a satisfactory and appropriate locaiton to secure their

long-term future. It will necessary that these matters should be finalised via legal

agreement prior to the commencement of development.



Criterion XVI

The potential impact upon the setting and

significance of the Ashton Memorial as a result of

new development should be investigated, and where

potential concerns may arise, mitigation measures

should be put in place;

Criterion XVI

Proposals will need to take account of the recommendations for mitigating harm and/or

maximising enhancements as set out in the Council’s Heritage Impact Assessment for the

site. The potential impact upon the setting and significance of the Ashton Memorial as a

result of new development should be investigated, and where potential concerns may

arise, mitigation measures should be put in place;

To provide further clarity to the policy and provide

greater consistency with the evidence base.MAIN No No


Criterion II

The provison of additional school places at a

secondary level. To achieve this it is expected that

contributions will be made towards the delivery of a

new secondary school at Bailrigg Garden Village (as

identified via Policy SG1 of this DPD) which will

increase the range of secondary school places in the

Criteria II

The provison of additional school places at a secondary level. To achieve this it is

expected that contributions will be made towards the delivery of a new secondary school

in South Lancaster at Bailrigg Garden Village (as identified via Policy SG1 of this DPD)

which will increase the range of secondary school places in the district to meet projected

future needs.



Criterion VI

The creation of improved cycling and walking linkages

between the proposed growth in East Lancaster,

Caton Road Employment Area, Lancaster City Centre,

the Ridge Estate and new developments to the South

of Strategic Site SG7. Proposals should come forward

with appropriate mechanisms for future maintenance

of the new routes.

Criterion VI

The creation of improved cycling and walking linkages between the proposed growth in

East Lancaster, Caton Road Employment Area, Lancaster City Centre, the Ridge Estate

and new developments to the South of Strategic Site SG7. Opportunities for

improvements along the Lancaster Canal should be explored. Proposals should come

forward with appropriate mechanisms for future maintenance of the new routes.


MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA


Criterion V

Beyond the on-site contributions to meet localised

open space needs, the Council will expect

contributions towards the improvement to

Williamson Park so that the park may better

accommodate increased use of its facilities

associated with new development.

Delete Criterion V and move the text to the end of the Policy. Amend the text to read:

In particular, Bbeyond the on-site contributions to meet localised open space needs, the

Council will expect contributions towards the improvement to Williamson Park so that

the park may better accommodate increased use of its facilities associated with the

demands of new development in the locality . Given the scale of contributions

associated with the East Lancaster Strategic Site (SG7) and the delivery of a new Country

Park in this location, development proposals within Policy SG7 will be exempt from this

requirement.



Penultimate Paragraph

It is anticipated that contributions will be sought from

these developments where it is considered that their

development will cause impacts on the infrastructure

outlined in this policy.


It is anticipated that contributions will be sought from these developments where it is

considered that their development will cause impacts, either individually or cumulatively

on the infrastructure outlined in this policy.


CHAPTER 15: NORTH LANCASTER


Criterion III

Building an appropriate mix of housing types and sizes

to meet evidenced local housing needs wihtin the

Council's most up-to-date Strategic Housing Market

Assessment

Criterion III

Building an appropriate mix of housing types and sizes to meet evidenced local housing

needs wihtin the Council's most up-to-date Strategic Housing Market Assessment,

including provisions for Self-Build properties;

To provide greater consistency with the wider plan

and direction of national planning policy.MAIN No No


Criterion V

The submission of a detailed design statement,

recognising the prominent and sensitive location of

Beaumont Hall as a northern gateway into Lancaster

and its proximity to the Bay Gateway which is to the

north. The design, layout and materials used...

Criterion V

The submission of a detailed design statement, recognising the prominent and sensitive

location of Beaumont Hall as a northern gateway into Lancaster, and its proximity to the

Bay Gateway which is to the north and the heritage assets within and adjacent to the

site . The design, layout and materials used...


SPLA M129 Policy SG9 Additional criteria to be added to Policy SG9.

Include new criteria to read

The identification and protection of the Valley Meadow Habitat Creation Area detailing

how this area will be maintained and protected. This should be prepared in dialogue with

the County Council having regards to the Meadow Habitat Licence Agreement;



Criterion XII

Proposals will be expected to fully assess the

potential impact upon the setting and significance of

Beaumont Hall, Hammerton Hall, Carus Lodge

Cottage, the curtilage listed wall on Halton Road,

Hammerton Hall Bridge, Folly Bridge, Beaumont Hall

Bridge, Halton Road Bridge and the Lune Aqueduct as

a result of new development should be investigated

and where potential concerns may arise, mitigation

measures put in place...

Criterion XII

Proposals will be expected to fully assess the potential effect impact upon the setting and

significance of Heritage Assets at Beaumont Hall, Hammerton Hall, Carus Lodge Cottage,

the curtilage listed wall on Halton Road, Hammerton Hall Bridge, Folly Bridge, Beaumont

Hall Bridge, Halton Road Bridge and the Lune Aqueduct as a result of proposed new

development. should be investigated and wW here potential concerns may arise,

mitigation measures put in place. Proposals will need to take account of the

recommendations for mitigating harm and/or maximising enhancements as set out in

the Council’s Heritage Impact Assessment for the site; Proposals should make use of the

Heritage Assessments which have been prepared by the City Council in relation to this

site;

To provide further clarity to the policy and

consistency with the evidence base.MAIN No No


Criterion II







Criterion II





future needs.


CHAPTER 16: SOUTH CARNFORTH


Such an expansion will not only provide opportunities

for grown on greenfield sites but also assist in the

delivery of the extensive brownfield site at Lundsfield

Quarry. Whilst permission for residential

development has been granted on this site….

Such an expansion will not only provide opportunities for grown on greenfield sites but

also assist in the delivery of the extensive brownfield site at Lundsfield Quarry. Whilst

permission for residential development has been previously granted on this site….

To provide greater clarity and provide an updated

position on this site.MAIN No No

SPLA M133 SG11

First Paragraph

The former Lundsfield Quarry site has been allocated

for residential development. The site was previously

home to a concrete works and a marina for the canal.

The concrete works is now redundant, and the marina

has also closed. Redevelopment of this site is

supported by the Council as it offers the opportunity

to regenerate and bring back into use a large

brownfield site and the marina, providing much

needed housing, securing wider environmental and

amenity improvements and delivering enhanced

connectivity across Carnforth.

First Paragraph

The former Lundsfield Quarry site has been allocated for residential development. The

site was previously home to a concrete works and a marina for the canal. The concrete

works is now redundant, and the marina has also closed. This site is also home to the

Carnforth Rangers Football Club. However, because the club is expanding and looking to

secure their long-term future they are seeking to relocate and make this land available

for housing development and the required associated infrastructure. Redevelopment of

this site is supported by the Council as it offers the opportunity to re-use land at

Lundsfield Quarry regenerate and bring back into use a large brownfield site and the

adjacent marina, providing much needed housing, securing wider environmental and

amenity improvements and delivering enhanced connectivity across Carnforth.

To ensure consistency with the evidence base MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M134 Policy SG11 Additional paragraph to be added following 16.7.

Additional text to read:

Any bridges or other structures crossing the canal would have to consider various

navigational constraints including navigational air draft, potenital for vessel or debris

impact. Furthermore any crossings across the canal would require close liaison with the

Canal and River Trust in terms of design (which should seek to enhance the character of

the canal), necessary height clearance and the carrying out of works. Consideration and

a mechanism for ongoing maintenance of the new bridge would also need to be

addressed.



Criterion III


to meet evidenced local housing needs within the

Council’s most up-to-date Strategic Housing Market

Assessment.

Criterion III


needs within the Council’s most up-to-date Strategic Housing Market Assessment. This

should include investigating the delivery of self-build residential dwellings to meet

evidenced local needs ;



Criterion VII

Proposals should seek to provide a positive inter-

relatioship with the adjacent Lancaster Canal in

accordance with Policy T3 of this DPD providing a

sufficient buffer between new development and the

Canal, which is designated as a Biological Heritage

Site (BHS)

Criterion VII

Proposals should seek to provide a positive inter-relatioship with the adjacent Lancaster

Canal in accordance with Policy T3 of this DPD providing a sufficient buffer between new

development and the Canal, which is designated as a Biological Heritage Site (BHS)

To reduced repetition within the Local Plan. MAIN No No

SPLA M140 Policy SG11 Addition of a new criterion within Policy SG11.

New criterion to read:

To provide new home owners with ‘Home Owner Packs’. This will include details of the

sensitivities of the land adjacent to the development (and the wider Morecambe Bay

coastline) to recreational pressure, and promote the use of alternative areas for

recreation, such as public open space within the development;

To provide consistency with SA Report. MAIN No No


Criterion X

Proposals should contribue to the develoer of green

corridor and ecological network within South

Carnforth with opportunties for enhancing

biodiversity, recreation and leisure uses to be

investigated via any application.

Criterion X

Proposals should contribue to the develoer of green corridor and ecological network

within South Carnforth and include with opportunties for enhancing biodiversity,

recreation and leisure uses to be investigated via any application. Proposals which result

in wildlife fragmentation on the site will be resisted by the Council.


SPLA M142 Policy SG11 New criterion to be added following Criterion XI




site;

To provide further clarity to the policy MAIN No No


Criterion XIII

The preparation of a Flood Risk Assessment that

details how, through the design, construction and

occupation phases of development, the matters of

flood risk should be dealt with. This should where

necessary include suitable and appropriate mitigation

measures which are delivered to the satisfaction of

both the Environment Agency and Lead Local Flood

Criterion XIII

The submission preparation of a Flood Risk Assessment that details how, through the

design, construction and occupation phases of development, the matters of flood risk

should be dealt with. This should where necessary include suitable and appropriate

mitigation measures to be which are delivered on site; to the satisfaction of both the

Environment Agency and Lead Local Flood Authority;


SPLA M145 Policy SG12 Addition paragraph to be added after 16.19


To the east of the Strategic site is the M6 motorway and, beyond, a number of active

quarrying uses including a concrete products and asphalt batching plant which is of

regional importance due to its use in the repair and maintenance of the strategic road

network. It is important that the amenity issues are therefore fully addressed in any

development proposal that comes forward. This consideration is necessary in order to

make development in close proximity to the motorway and quarry workings acceptable

in planning terms and to ensure that residents of the new development are not unduly

impacted by this adjacent land-use. This can be achieved through setting housing back

from Back Lane (the main haul route from the quarry to the M6), the provision of triple-

glazing for any properties which have frontages onto Back Lane, orienting housing so

that it does not face onto Back Lane, providing for a bund or landscaping adjacent to

Back Lane to reduce noise impacts arising from the motorway and quarry operations.



Criterion III


to meet evidenced local housing needs within the

Council’s most up-to-date Strategic Housing Market

Assessment;

Criterion III


needs within the Council’s most up-to-date Strategic Housing Market Assessment. This

should include investigating the delivery of self-build residential dwellings to meet

evidenced local needs ;



Criterion VIII

…Landscaping should seek to to enhance the sites

position adjacent to the Lancaster Canal.

Criterion VIII

…Landscaping should seek to to enhance the sites position adjacent to the Lancaster

Canal in order to create an attractive waterside frontage .


MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M151 Policy SG12 Addition criterion to be added

Further criterion to be added to the 'Environmental Considerations' section to read:

Proposals should fully and satisfactorily address amenity issues, including noise and air

quality issues which arise from the proximity of the M6 and quarry operations which are

located to the east of this site.



Criterion X

Proposals should contribue to the develoer of green

corridor and ecological network within South

Carnforth with opportunties for enhancing

biodiversity, recreation and leisure uses to be

investigated via any application.

Criterion X

Proposals should contribue to the development of green corridor and ecological network

within South Carnforth with opportunties for enhancing biodiversity, recreation and

leisure uses to be investigated via any application. Proposals which result in wildlife

fragmentation on the site will be resisted by the Council.


SPLA M153 Policy SG12 New criterion to be added following Criterion XII




site;

To provide further clarity to the policy and provide



In promoting improved linkages to Carnforth Town

Centre, opportunties to enhance the local cycling and

walking networks through both sites would be

explored. Of particular important to the sustainability

of this area is the delivery of a strong link between

South Carnforth and Carnforth town centre, which

includes a pedestrian / cycle crossing of the Lancaster

Canal at an appropriate and logical location.

In promoting improved linkages to Carnforth Town Centre, opportunties to enhance the

local cycling and walking networks through both sites sh would be explored making use

of existing networks and public rights of way. Of particular important to the

sustainability of this area is the delivery of a strong link between South Carnforth and

Carnforth town centre, which includes a pedestrian / cycle crossing of the Lancaster

Canal at an appropriate and logical location. In order to achieve this connection

consideration will need to be given to navigational constraints, including navigational air

draft and potential for vessel or debris impact. There will need to be close liaison with

the Canal and River Trust in terms of design, necessary height clearance and the carrying

out of works. A mechanism for the ongoing maintenance of the new bridge will also

need to be addressed.


SPLA M156 Policy SG13 Delete paragraph 16.28.

The Council will continue to work with landowners, developers and local sports groups to

ensure the right levels of provisoon can be achieved with more detailed guidance

provided in the future Development Brief for the South Carnforth area.

To reduce repetition within the policy. MAIN No No


Criterion I

The provision of additional school places at a primary

level. To achieve this it is expected that new

development funds the creation of a new school, to

be provided within Strategic Site SG12 in an

appropriate, convenient and accessible location to be

agreed with the education authority. The new primary

Criterion I

The provision of additional school places at a primary level. To achieve this it is expected

that new development funds the creation of a new school, to be provided within

Strategic Site SG12 in an appropriate, convenient and accessible location to be agreed

with the education authority. The new primary school...



Criterion II







Criterion II





future needs.



Criterion III

The delivery of improvements to the existing highway

network particularly relating to any necessary

improvements to both Kellet Road and Back Lane to

the satisfaction of the local highways authority and

which maintains existing capacity levels and ensure

that increased traffic does not restrict HGV

Criterion III

The delivery of improvements to the existing highway network to ensure safe movement

and capacity for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists, particularly relating to any necessary

improvements to both Kellet Road and Back Lane to the satisfaction of the local highways

authority and which maintains existing capacity levels and ensure that increased traffic

does not restrict HGV movements to nearby quarry operations;



Criterion IV

…and Carnforth Town Centre. This should include the

creation of a new bridge over the Lancaster Canal for

both pedestrians and cyclists…

Criterion IV

…and Carnforth Town Centre. This should include the creation of a single new bridge

crossing over the Lancaster Canal for both pedestrians and cyclists…



Final Paragraph

Where necessary and appropriate to do so, applicants

may be required to enter into legal agreements…

Final Paragraph

Where necessary and appropriate to do so, applicants will may be required to enter into

legal agreements…


CHAPTER 17: SOUTH HEYSHAM

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M165 Policy SG14 Additional paragraph to be added following 17.15

Additional Paragraph to read:

The Council expect development proposals at Heysham Gateway to deliver positive

benefits to the the local environment, including improvements to recreational access,

safety and amenity on open land throughout the area. Development proposals will also

maintain, restore and create functional ecological networks, particularly in relation to

the three Biological Heritage Sites (BHS) in the area, and the Heysham Moss SSSI and

nature reserve to the north. Where this is demonstrated to be impractical or overridden

by other environmental, economic or social factors, development proposals should show

how any residual impacts will be mitigated, offset and/or compensated.



Criterion I

Development proposals should be complimentary to

the wider uses of South Heysham and Middleton

addressing any amenity issues appropriately;

Criterion I

Development proposals should be complimentary to the wider uses of South Heysham

and Middleton addressing any amenity issues appropriately;

To avoid unnecessary repetition within the policy. MAIN No No


Criterion II

Proposals should include improvements to the local

transport network…

Criterion II

Proposals must should include improvements to the local transport network…To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No


Criterion III

Proposals should seek to protect areas that have

important biodiversity…

Criterion III

Proposals must should seek to protect areas that have important biodiversity…To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No


Criterion IV

That proposals should contribute to improvement to

the green network…

Criterion IV

That proposals must should contribute to improvement to the green network...To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No



Future proposals should seek to address all relevant

elements of the Local Plan and have due regard to the

direction of the Lancashire County Council's Waste

and Minerals Plan.

Penultimate Paragrpah

Future proposals should seek to address all relevant elements of the Local Plan and have

due regard to the direction of the Lancashire County Council's Waste and Minerals Plan.

Where appropriate proposals should have due regard to the Council's emergency

planning procedures in relation to the nearby nuclear power station.



Final Paragraph

The Heysham Gateway has also included an area of

land to the South of Heysham Moss that has been

safeguarded for future use by National Grid as part of

the North West Connections Project. Future

proposals for in this areas should pay due regard to

Policy DM53 of the Development Management DPD.

Final Paragraph

The Heysham Gateway has also included an area of land to the South of Heysham Moss

that has been safeguarded for future use by National Grid as part of the North West

Connections Project (identifed under Policy SG15.1 of the Local Plan Policies Map) .

Future proposals in this areas should pay due regard to Policy DM53 of the Development

Management DPD.

To provide further clarity to the policy and to ensure

that the policy has been prepared in accordance with

the requirements of the SA / HRA.

MAIN No No

SPLA M176 Policy SG15 New Final Paragraph to be included to Policy SG15

New Final Paragraph to read

Future proposals in relation to Substation Land (SG15.1) will need to demonstrate that

no European designated site would be adversely affected by development either alone or

in combination with other proposals, as per the requirements of Policy EN9 of this DPD.

In view of the potential for likely significant effects as a result of this allocation the

requirements of Appendix D must be delivered as part of any future proposal.

To ensure policy is in line with the HRA MAIN No No

SPLA M178 Policy SG16 Further criterion to be included within this paragraph.

Further criterion to be added:

The impacts on local infrastructure in relation to basic service provision, community

facilities and health care.




…future construction of nuclear reactor(s) from

inappropriate development that would constrain the

future development of the facility.


…future construction of nuclear reactor(s) from inappropriate development that would

constrain the future development of the facility. The Council will also seek to safeguard

emergency routes within and around the site from inappropriate development.


CHAPTER 18: THE ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT AND REGENERATION

SPLA M180 Policy EC1

General Employment Areas

Development proposals for B1 (Office), B2 (General

Industrial) and B8 (Storage and Distribution) will be

supported in principle within established employment

areas as identified below.

General Employment Areas

Development proposals for B1 (Office), B2 (General Industrial) and B8 (Storage and

Distribution) will be supported in principle within established employment areas as

identified below. Within these employment areas proposals which are not covered by 'B'

land-use class uses will be restricted unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.



The Loss of Employment Areas

The Council will support the regeneration and re-

development of the former employment areas at

Lune Industrial Estate (Lancaster) for a mix of

employment and residential purposes (in accordance

with Policy DOS3 of this DPD) and at the former

Thomas Graveson Site, Warton Road, Carnforth for

recreational purposes in accordance with Policy H8 of

The Loss of Employment Areas

The Council will support the regeneration and re-development of the former

employment areas at Lune Industrial Estate (Lancaster) for a mix of employment and

residential purposes (in accordance with Policy DOS3 of this DPD) and at the former

Thomas Graveson Site, Warton Road, Carnforth for recreational purposes in accordance

with Policy H8 of this DPD.

To avoid unnecessary repetition within the policy. MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA


Final Paragraph

Future proposals in relation to Glasson Dock and

Lancaster West Business Park will need to

demonstrate that no European designated site would

be adversely affected by development either alone or

in combination with other proposals, as per the

requirements of Policy EN9 of this DPD.

Final Paragraph

Future proposals in relation to Glasson Dock, Port of Heysham Industrial Estate and

Lancaster West Business Park will need to demonstrate that no International European

designated site would be adversely affected by development either alone or in

combination with other proposals, as per the requirements of Policy EN9 of this DPD.

To ensure policy is in line with the HRA MAIN No No


SG2 - Lancaster University Innovation Park -

Allocation made to deliver opportunities for

technology and research based industries that

provide close linkages to the adjacent university

SG2 - Lancaster University Health Innovation Campus Park - Allocation made to deliver

opportunities for technology and research based industries and ancillary education-

linked uses that provide close linkages to the adjacent university campus.


SPLA M190 Policy EC3 New paragraph to be added at the start of Policy EC3The site has been allocated to meet a specific identified need for the relocation of the

Lancaster Auction Mart and to support economic growth of rural land-based businesses.To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No


First Paragraph

The Council will support the development of this site

for a new Agri-Business Centre that is focussed

around the relocaiton of the existing Lancaster

Auction Mart from its current base at Wyresdale

Road, Lancaster. Employment uses on this site must

be ancillary to the agricultural nature of this

allocation, seeking to facilitate the local agricultural

economy within the district and wider region.

First Paragraph

The Council will support the development of this site for a new Agri-Business Centre

subject to the inclusion of the relocated Auction Mart and on the condition that

employment uses consist of land-based businesses which are that is focussed around

the relocaiton of the existing Lancaster Auction Mart from its current base at Wyresdale

Road, Lancaster. Employment uses on this site must be ancillary to the agricultural nature

of this allocation, seeking to facilitate the local agricultural economy within the district

and wider region.


SPLA M194 Policy EC3 Additional criterion to be added to Policy EC3.

Additional criterion to read:



site;


SPLA M195 Policy EC3 Addition criterion to be added to Policy EC3.


Proposals should not result in any prejudice to the operation of the North West Ethylene

Pipeline which runs in the vicinity of this site. Development should ensure that sufficient

buffering is provided where necessary to protect amenity and ensure the safe operation

of the pipeline;


SPLA M196 Policy EC3Further paragraph to be added following the list of

criteria.

Proposals for uses which will generate visitors and traffic unrelated to the Auction Mart

and land-based businesses will not be supported, either as part of the development of

the site or as part of any future changes of use or incremental expansion.


SPLA M197 Policy EC4 Delete Policy EC4 from the Plan. Delete Policy EC4 from the Plan.To provide greater consistency with the wider plan

and to reflect suggested modifications to EC1.MAIN Yes No

CHAPTER 19: TOWN CENTRES AND RETAILING

SPLA M201 Policy TC1

Carnforth (TC1.3) - Market Town - Carnforth will

maintain its role as a market town and key service

centre to the rural hinterland

Carnforth (TC1.3) - Market Town - Carnforth will maintain its role as a market town

providing services both to the residents of the town and a wider and key service centre to

the rural hinterland

To provide consistency within both the policy and

the wider plan.MAIN No No

CHAPTER 20: HOUSING

SPLA M206 Policy H1

Reference within the housing table

SG7 - Ridge Farm/Cuckoo Farm, East Lancaster - 900 -

Allocation

Reference within the housing table

SG7 - East Lancaster Strategic Site Ridge Farm/Cuckoo Farm, East Lancaster - 925 00 -

Allocation

To provide consistency with the evidence base. MAIN No No

SPLA M217 Policy H1 New allocation to be added within the Housing TableReference within the Housing Table

H3.2 - Land at Stone Row Head Farm, East Lancaster - 10 - AllocationTo provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M223 Policy H1 Total Allocations (Urban Area) - 6,938 Dwellings Total Allocations (Urban Area) - 7,005 6,938 Dwellings To provide consistency with the wider Plan. MAIN No No

SPLA M225 Policy H1A new paragraph to be added following the first NB

described *

New text to read

Dwelling numbers represent the allocated capacity for sites. Not all this capacity will be

built out within the Plan period. For a number of sites delivery will fall below this capacity

within the Local Plan period with a number of sites being built out beyond the plan

period.


SPLA M239 Policy H2

Reference within the Housing Table

H2.10 - Land between Low Road and Forge Lane,

Halton - 90 - PP Granted

Reference within the Housing Table

H2.8 10 - Land between Low Road and Forge Lane, Halton - 76 90 - PP GrantedTo provide consistency with the evidence base. MAIN No No

SPLA M242 Policy H2 Further Site to be added to the Housing TableReference within the Housing Table

H2.11 - Land adjacent to Church Bank and Greenways, Over Kellet** - 15 - PP Granted

To update the policy - this site has now been granted

planning permission and represents sustainable

development.

MAIN No No

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M243 Policy H2 Total Allocations (Rural Area) - 1,024 Dwellings Total Allocations (Rural Area) - 991 1,024 Dwellings To provide consistency with the Policy MAIN No No

SPLA M249 Policy H3

Third Paragraph

Future proposals will need to be supported by a

comprehensive masterplan demonstrating how the

heritage assets and their setting will be conserved

through the proposal and their future protected and

secured.

Third Paragraph

Future proposals will need to be supported by a comprehensive masterplan

demonstrating how the heritage assets and their setting will be conserved through the

proposal and their future protected and secured. Proposals will need to take account of

the recommendations for mitigating harm and/or maximising enhancements as set out

in the Council’s Heritage Impact Assessment for the site.

To provide further clarity on the policy and


SPLA M250 Policy H3 Additional paragraph to be added.

Addition paragraph to be added prior to the Ridge Lea Hospital Section

Proposals will also need to demonstrate how the site relates to adjacent communities in

East Lancaster having regard to wider residential amenity, highway, cycle and pedestrian

connectivity.


SPLA M253 Policy H3New Section to be included in Policy H3 under the sub-

title of 'Land at Stone Row Head'.

New text to read:

The site is expected to accommodate 10 residential units through sympathetic

conversion of some parts of the existing farmstead buildings and some sensitive

development within the immediate setting.

Proposals should be led by an informed understanding of the significance of the farm

buildings. This understanding should inform the retention of buildings and/or structures

within the site and the sensitive design, siting and heights of buildings within the

grounds.

To provide further clarity within the Policy and

reflect that the area originally described as land at

Ridge Lea Hospital has been sub-divided into two

separate sites to reflect land ownership matters.

MAIN No No

SPLA M254 Policy H3

Second Paragraph of the University of Cumbria

Section

Proposals will need to have regard to the relationship

of the site with the wider University of Cumbria

footprint taking account of the continued operation

of the University and the sites interrelationsip with

the wider environmental and historical assets of the

campus.

Second Paragraph of the University of Cumbria Section

Proposals will need to have regard to the relationship of the site with the wider

University of Cumbria footprint taking account of the continued operation of the

University and the sites interrelationsip with the wider environmental and historical

assets of the campus. This should be demonstrated via a masterplan submitted by the

University , confirming that the site is no longer required and that its loss would not

impact on the ability of the University to meet its future short to medium term

development needs.


SPLA M257 Policy H3Additional paragraphs to be added under the sub-title

'Stone Row Head'

Stone Row Head Farm was acquired in 1908 by the Asylum board and was one of three

farms in the early 20th Century which supported Lancaster Moor Hospital and provided

its patients with an understanding of agricultural work. The farmstead has been altered

and extended to the north of the site in the early 20th Century.

In the interests of conserving the historic interest of the farmstead, any additional

development will need to be sympathetic to the vernacular appearance of these

buildings.

To provide clarity and consistency with the policy. MAIN No No

SPLA M260 Policy H4

Second Paragraph

The Council will prepare a Development Brief to set

out in more detail how development of this site

should move forward. The Council will expect that

future proposals for the site should be prepared in

the context of this Development Brief and taken

forward through a comprehensive masterplan for the

whole site that addresses the issues of phasing,

delivering the necessary infrastructure and addressing

Second Paragraph

The Council will prepare a Development Brief to set out in more detail how development

of this site should move forward. The Council will expect that future proposals for the site

should be prepared in the context of this Development Brief and taken forward through a

comprehensive masterplan for the whole site that addresses the issues of phasing,

delivering the necessary infrastructure and addressing all issues set out within the Brief.


SPLA M261 Policy H4

Third Paragraph

In preparing the masterplan and future planning

application, the Council will require the following

matters to be addressed:'

Third Paragraph

In preparing the masterplan and future planning application, the Council will require the

following matters to be addressed In bringing forward development proposals for this

site the Council will expect the following matters to be addressed: '


SPLA M263 Policy H4

Criterion II

The submission of a detailed design statement,

recognising its sensitive location in the setting of

Ashton Memorial and Williamson Park to the west

and areas of Urban Setting Landscape to the east.

Design, layout and materials used should be

sympathetic to the locality and create a strong sense

of place, providing a well-designed and high-quality

Criterion II

The submmission of a detailed design statement, recognising its development should

respond to the key considerations identified in the design, landscape and heritage

statements, recognising the sensitive location in the setting of Ashton Memorial and

Williamson Park to the west (which are important heritage assets and prominent

landmarks in the wider area) and areas of Urban Setting Landscape Key Urban

Landscape to the east.


SPLA M264 Policy H4

Criterion III

To enhance the site's prominent location on the

eastern edge of Lancaster, within the setting of

Ashton Memorial and Williamson Park. Proposals will

need to clearly demonstrate, through appropriate

layout, design and landscaping that it will not result in

unacceptable harm on the setting of these important

heritage assets and the area's wider role in defining

the character of East Lancaster;

Criterion III

To preserve and enhance the site's prominent location on the eastern edge of Lancaster,

within the setting of the Ashton Memorial, which is a highly significant heritage asset

and a promient landmark in the wider area , and Williamson Park. Proposals will need to

clearly demonstrate clearly , through appropriate layout, design and landscaping that it

will not result in unacceptable harm on the setting of these important heritage assets and

the area's wider role in defining the character of East Lancaster;


MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M265 Policy H4

Criterion IV

The improvement and enhancement of land identified

under Policy EN10.1 of this DPD which should be used

as amenity space that provides wider public benefit

both to existing and new residents in the East

Criterion IV

The improvement and enhancement of land identified under Policy EN10.1 of this DPD

which should be used as amenity space that provides wider public benefit both to

existing and new residents in the East Lancaster area;

To avoid repetition with other criteria within Policy

H4.MAIN No No

SPLA M267 Policy H4

Criteria X

Proposals should ensure that the residential amenity

of new residents is not compromised by surrounding

uses, inparticular any residual commercial uses in the

surrounding area and nearby M6 motorway;

Criteria X

Proposals should achieve high standards of amenity for existing and future residents in

accordance with policy DM29 and ensure that the residential amenity of new residents is

not compromised by surrounding uses, in particular any residual commercial uses in the

surrounding area and nearby M6 motorway;


SPLA M268 Policy H4

Criteria XIV

The incorporation of cycling and pedestrian access

with strong and positivelinkages to the existing

network including imporvements to the links from the

site into Lancaster City Centre and the wider East

Lancaster area;

Criteria XIV

The incorporation of cycling and pedestrian access with strong and positive linkages to

the existing network including improvements to the links improved linkages from the site

into Lancaster City Centre and the wider East Lancaster area ensuring that there is no

significant adverse impacts from the development on the efficency of the local highway

network or on highway safety;


SPLA M269 Policy H4

Criterion XVII

Approximately 40% of the residential units will be

defined as 'affordable' which includes the delivery of

a full range of affordable products through dialogue

with the Local Planning Authority.

Criterion XVII

In accordance with Policy DM3 of the Development Management DPD, 30% of the

residential units will be required to be ‘affordable housing’ as defined by the current

National Planning Policy Framework. It is expected that 50% of the units will be rented

and 50% will be intermediate tenure unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning

Authority. Approximately 40% of the residential units will be defined as 'affordable'

which includes the delivery of a full range of affordable products through dialogue with

the Local Planning Authority.

To provide further clarity with the policy and


SPLA M272 Policy H5 Replace paragraph 20.31 with alternative text.

Given the sites relationship with this important landscape designation it is important

that any future proposals include landscape and design assessments which identify how

through sensitive design, layout and landscaping the visual impacts of new development

can be mitigated and natural features safeguarded.

This is particularly relevant in relation to the mature vegetation which lines the north

eastern edge of the site. Whilst some development is supported within the area

designated as USL this is on the basis of securing well designed development which

positively includes and considers the landscape value of the site. Piecemeal development

of this site will not be supported.The Council will seek to provide a Development Brief

which will provide further guidance on how sensitive development can be achieved on

this site, the brief will specifically relate to the delivery of development on site H5.2.

In supporting development the council will require proposals to make a positive

contribution to the wider landscape setting of the area protecting in perpetuity the

contribution that the north eastern corner of the site makes to the wider USL designation

of the area. Encroachment into the adjacent USL will not be supported.


SPLA M273 Policy H5 To delete Policy H5 and to replace with new text.

To delete Policy H5 and to replace with new text.

Due to the comprehensive nature of this suggested modification these changes

proposed are not highlighted in this modification list but can be viewed in the

accompanying tracked-changed Strategic Policies & Land Allocations DPD.

To provide consistency with other policy directions in

the Plan and to clarify the approach taken in the

policy it was determined that the policy required

comprehensive modification.

MAIN Yes No

SPLA M277 Policy H6 Further criterion to be added to Policy H6.

New Criterion to read:

Proposals will be expected to fully assess potential impacts upon the significance and

setting of the curtilage of Derby Home, which is listed, identifying measures to enhance

or protect its setting. Favourable consideration will be given to proposals for sympathetic

conversion schemes which conserve or enhance the building's significance, whilst

securing its optimum long-term viable use. Where any harm to its setting cannot be

avoided, mitigation measures will be required.


SPLA M278 Policy H6 Further criterion to be added to Policy H6.

New Criterion to read:



site;


SPLA M279 Policy H6

Criteria IX

…particularly improving linkages both along Ashton

Road and Lancaster Canal.

Criteria IX

…particularly improving linkages both along Ashton Road and Lancaster Canal, ensuring

that there is no significant adverse impacts from development proposals on the

efficiency (capacity and congestion) of the local highway network or on highway safety;


MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M281 Policy H6

Criterion XII

Approximately 40% of the residential units will be

defined as 'affordable' which includes the delivery of

a full range of affordable products through dialogue

with the Local Planning Authority.

Criterion XII

In accordance with Policy DM3 of the Development Management DPD, 30% of the

residential units will be required to be ‘affordable housing’ as defined by the current

National Planning Policy Framework. It is expected that 50% of the units will be rented

and 50% will be intermediate tenure unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning

Authority. Approximately 40% of the residential units will be defined as 'affordable'

which includes the delivery of a full range of affordable products through dialogue with

the Local Planning Authority.

Approximately provide criterion clarity

Approximately ter policy.MAIN No No

CHAPTER 21: DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SITES

SPLA M282 Policy DOS1

Third Paragraph

Proposals for residential apartments (including

student accommodation) on this site will also be

supported where they meet appropriate amenity

standards and are consistent with all relevant policies

within the Local Plan.

Third Paragraph

Proposals for residential apartments (including student accommodation) on this site will

also be supported where they meet appropriate amenity standards and are consistent

with all relevant policies within the Local Plan.

To reflect flood risk evidence. MAIN No No

SPLA M283 Policy DOS1 Delete criterion III of Policy DOS1

Delete criterion III

That any proposed use on this site for residential purposes meet appropriate amenity

standards in terms of privacy distances, daylight and space standards in accordance with

other relevant policies within the Development Management DPD;

To reflect flood risk evidence. MAIN No No

SPLA M284 Policy DOS1 Further criterion to be added to Policy DOS1

Additional criteria in Policy DOS1 to read:

Proposals will be expected to demonstrate that the air quality within Lancaster Air

Quality Management Area will not be impacted from the proposed development and

that adequate mitigation measures are provided in accordance with Policy DM31 of the

Development Management DPD;

To provide consistency with the wider Local Plan. MAIN No No


Criterion VI

Proposals seek to preserve, or enhance the setting of

numerous heritage assets in the immediate vicinity

and across the wider townscape of Lancaster.

Criterion VI

Proposals seek to preserve, or enhance the setting of numerous heritage assets in the

immediate vicinity and across the wider townscape of Lancaster. Proposals will need to

take account of the recommendations for mitigating harm and/or maximising

enhancements as set out in the Council’s Heritage Impact Assessment for the site.

To provide clarity within the Policy and provide


SPLA M286 Policy DOS2 Delete Policy DOS2 from the Plan.

Delete Policy DOS2 from the Plan.

All DOS policies are subsequently re-numbered to take account of the deletion of this

policy.




Partnership with British Land it has been considered

necessary to incorporate this site back into the wider

allocation for the Canal Quarter, as defined by Policy

SG5 of this DPD.

MAIN No No

SPLA M287 Policy DOS3 Delete Policy DOS3 from the Plan.

Delete Policy DOS3 from the Plan

All DOS policies are subsequently re-numbered to take account of the deletion of this

policy.

Development on the site is already at an advanced

stage and therefore a policy for this site is no longer

considered relevant.

MAIN No No


Criterion VIII

That issues relating to ground contamination are fully

investigated prior to the commencement of any

development on the site and that suitable

remediation measures are adopted.

Criterion VIII

That issues relating to ground contamination are fully investigated and mitigated prior to

the commencement of any development on the site and that suitable remediation

measures are adopted;


SPLA M289 Policy DOS4 Additional new criterion to be added




site.




Criterion III

High quality design and use of material that respect

the character and setting of historic assets on the

site.

Criterion III

High quality design and use of material that respect the character and setting of historic

assets on the site. Proposals will need to take account of the recommendations for

mitigating harm and/or maximising enhancements as set out in the Council’s Heritage

Impact Assessment for the site;



MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M292 Policy DOS7Replace the second paragraph of Policy DOS7 with

amended wording.

Second Paragraph of Policy DOS7 amended to read:

The Council's preference is for the completion of the original retirement village. The

Council will support alternative proposals for this site where they deliver the creation of a

self-sustaining settlement and facilitate the wider regeneration of this site. The Council

will support opportunities to deliver self-build residential dwellings on this site to meet

evidenced needs. The Council's preference is for the completion of the extant planning

permission relating to the site. If this development can be demonstrated not to be viable

then the Council will consider alternative proposals for this site



Third Paragraph

In considering new development proposals the

Council will expect the following issues to be

addressed:

Third Paragraph

In considering new development proposals the Council will expect the following issues to

be addressed. The Council will require development to be taken forward through a

comprehensive approach addressing the following issues:






site.





That consideration be given to the need for coastal defenceses as part of any future

submission.



Criterion I

That the proposed development is sympathetic

towards the surrounding heritage assets, in particular

the relationships between the Midland Hotel and

Winter Gardens.

Criterion I

That the proposed development is sympathetic towards the surrounding heritage assets,

in particular the relationships between the Midland Hotel and Winter Gardens. Proposals

will need to take account of the recommendations for mitigating harm and/or


site;

To provide further clarity and consistency with the

evidence base.MAIN No No

SPLA M301 Policy DOS9 New criterion to be added to Policy DOS9




site.



SPLA M303 Policy DOS10 New paragraph to be added to policy.

New Paragraph to read:



site



CHAPTER 22: THE HISTORIC AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

SPLA M305 Policy EN5 Absent text

Include additional text to the end of the policy 'Development in the open countryside

should be restricted to that essential to the needs of agriculture or forestry or to other

uses appropriate to a rural area '.

To provide greater clarity within the policy MAIN No No

SPLA M306 Policy EN7

The district contains a number of areas of open land

which are of value in their own right but aksi together

with other areas across the district make a

fundamental contribution to the character of the

main urban areas of the district.

The district contains a number of areas of open land which are of value in their own right

but aksi together with other areas across the district make a fundamental contribution to

the character of the main urban areas of the district. KULs include those areas within the

main urban area which are integral to the built form of the district, providing a setting

for important features and/or heritage assets. They play an important role in defining

the townscape of the main urban area and are inextricably linked to the experience of

the wider setting of these features. These areas also provide amenity value for local

residents and the wider community. The amenity value of these areas is protected via

other policies within the Local Plan.

To be consistent with the emerging evidence base. MAIN No No


These include the grounds of Lancaster Moor

Hospital, University of Cumbria, Ripley St. Thomas

School and Lancaster University, together with

Williamsons Park, Quay Meadow and Ryelands Park

and the urban coastline between Sandylands and

Higher Heysham. Although some development has

taken place in these areas, they remain essentially

open and contribute to the setting of the City.

These KULs include the grounds of Lancaster Moor Hospital, University of Cumbria, Ripley

St. Thomas School and Lancaster University, together with Williamsons Park, Quay

Meadow and Ryelands Park and the urban coastline between Sandylands and Higher

Heysham. Although some development has taken place in these areas, they remain

essentially open and contribute to the townscape of the main urban area setting of the

City.


MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA


Key Urban Landscapes are complemented by a

number of large areas of open land on the edge of

the urban area of the district. These are particularly

important to the setting of the main urban areas and

while not always of aesthetic value in their own right

provide an important role and fucntion in defining the

urban areas.

Key Urban Landscapes are complemented by a number of large areas of open land on the

edge of the urban area of the district. These are peripheral to the built form located on

the edge of the main urban area. These are identified because they provide a visual

frame for the urban area, providing an important role in the setting of existing

development, and providing a significant context or legibility to features either within the

landscape or surrounding it particularly important to the setting of the main urban areas

and while not always of aesthetic value in their own right provide an important role and

fucntion in defining the urban areas.



These range from the elevated land to the east of

Lancaster to the open countryside between

Morecambe and Heysham and land surrounding

Carnforth. Together these areas provide an important

role in maintaining a distinction between the town

and the country and in providing a rural backdrop and

These range from the elevated land to the east of Lancaster to the and open countryside

to the north of Lancaster between Morecambe and Heysham and land surrounding

Morecambe and Carnforth. Together these areas provide an important role in

maintaining a distinction between the town and the country and in providing a rural

backdrop and setting to the urban area.



Third paragraph of the policy 'Development will be

assessed in terms of its impact upon the Area of

Separation, including any harm to the effectiveness of

the gap between settlements and, in particular the

degree to which the development proposed would

compromise the function of the Area of Separation in

protectingthe identity and distinctiveness of

settlements'

Delete paragraph Development will be assessed in terms of its impact upon the Area of

Separation, including any harm to the effectiveness of the gap between settlements and,

in particular the degree to which the development proposed would compromise the

function of the Area of Separation in protectingthe identity and distinctiveness of

settlements' and amend to 'Development proposals within Areas of Separation will be

considered against how such proposals affect the openess and visual amenity of this

area. Proposals will not be supported where they have impacts on wider openess with

the areas and result in the coalescence between settlements and effect overall

distictiveness .'



Development proposals within Areas of Separation

will be considered against how such proposals affect

the openess and visual amenity within areas and will

not be supported where they have impacts on wider

openess with the areas and result in the coalescence

between settlement areas that affactes overall

distictiveness.

Delete paragraph

Development proposals within Areas of Separation will be considered against how such

proposals affect the openess and visual amenity within areas and will not be supported

where they have impacts on wider openess with the areas and result in the coalescence

between settlement areas that affactes overall distictiveness.

Paragraph has been included within the main policy MAIN No No


First paragraph

There are a number of sites within the district that

have been designated at a European, National and

Regional level for their environmental importance

Amend first paragraph to read

There are a number of sites within the district that have beeb designated at an

International European, National and Regional level for their environmental importance

For consistency with the rest of the Local Plan MAIN No No

SPLA M313 Policy EN9 European Designated Sites sub-heading Amend sub-heading: European Internationally Designated Sites For consistency with the rest of the Local Plan MAIN No No


Insert additional text at the end of the first row:

Land adjacent to Fenham Carr has been protected for a range of open space uses,

including informal amenity space and the opportunities to develop innovative storage

solutions for drainage, for instance the creation of balancing ponds and other

sympathetic SuDS schemes. It will preserve the immediate rural setting of the Ashton

Memorial and Williamson Park, which are designated heritage assets, provided by the

valley fields and help protect the Park's setting in closer views north-west from

Wyresdale Road and on Fenham Carr Lane.



Include additional text at the end of the second row:

Land adjacent to the M6 has been protected to maintain a green gap between

development and the motorway to protect residential amenity and views towards the

Ashton Memorial and Williamson Park and the wider setting of the Ashton Memorial and

Williamson Park. It will preserve the public’s visual amenity and appreciation of the

designated heritage assets from Newlands Road and the M6.


CHAPTER 23: SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

SPLA M322 Policy SC2

Reference within the Local Green Space Table:

SC2.13 - Carnforth Cemetery Wood - Historic

Significance and Recreational Value

Delete reference within the Local Green Space Table:

SC2.13 - Carnforth Cemetery Wood - Historic Significance and Recreational Value

Site is included within Carnforth Neighbourhood Plan

Area and it is for the Neighbourhood Plan to

consider its future designation.

MAIN No No

SPLA M327 Policy SC2Missing paragraph which should be added after

paragraph 23.14.

Include new paragraph after 23.14 to read:

In line with national planning policy areas of land protected by a higher designation have

not been designated as a Local Green Space. The following areas had been submitted for

consideration but due to higher designations have not been allocated within this Local

Plan:

*Miss Whalleys Field - Protected via Fields in Trust Centenary Field status * Fairfield

Green Play Area - Protected via Fields in Trust Queen Elizabeth II Field status * Moorside

Fields - Protected by Town Green status * Lancaster Cemetery - Designated Historic

Parks and Gardens * Williamsons Park - Designated Historic Parks and Gardens * Regent

Park - Protected via Fields in Trust Queen Elizabeth II Field status * Land at Heysham

Coast - Protected via legal covenants.


MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


THE SA


HRA

SPLA M328 Policy SC4 Remove site from the list of Green Space Networks Lancaster University Campus and the Eastern Fringes of LancasterTo provide consistency with the wider policy and


SPLA M329 Policy SC5 Remove an area from the list of deficiencies. Bailrigg Garden VillageTo provide consistency with the wider policy and


CHAPTER 24: TRANSPORT, ACCESSIBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY

SPLA M337 Policy T3Additional paragraph to be added following Criterion

VII

Development adjacent to waterways will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated

that it would not adversely impact on the structural integrity of the waterway or its

related infrastructure and assets.


CHAPTER 25: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF TERMS

SPLA M341 N/A Additional term to be added to the Glossary

Landscape Capacity

An approach to planning in the AONBs that allocates and permits development only

where it will not harm the primary purpose of designation, which is to conserve and

enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the area. This requires an

objective assessment of the landscape and visual impact resulting from potential

development.

To provide further clarity to the plan. MAIN No No

APPENDIX B: BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

APPENDIX C: NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING - LIST OF STRATEGIC POLICIES

APPENDIX D: SITE MITIGATION MEASURES

SPLA M349 N/ASecond Table of Appendix D. Seventh Row: 'Land at

Middleton Towers, Middleton (Policy DOS7)'

Delete 'Mitigation Option H' in relation to Land at Middleton Towers (Policy DOS7) under

'Recreation Pressure on adjacent FLL (operation only)'To ensure policy is in line with the HRA MAIN No No

SPLA M350 N/ASecond Table of Appendix D.Third Row: 'Port of

Heysham (SG14)'Change to 'Port of Heysham (SG14) Industrial Estate (EC1) ' To ensure policy is in line with the HRA MAIN No No

SPLA M351 N/A Final Table of Appendix D. Include reference to the Port of Heysham Expansion (Policy SG14)To provide consistency with the wider plan and the

findings of the SA / HRA process.MAIN No No

APPENDIX E: HOUSING TRAJECTORY

SPLA M353 N/A

Second Paragraph

The trajectory reports actual dwelling completions for

the period 2011/2012 to 2016/17. A total of 2,070

dwellings were completed during this period.

The trajectory reports actual dwelling completions for the period 2011/2012 to

20167 /18 7. A total of 2,595 070 dwellings were completed during this period.To provide and updated position on this matter. MAIN No No

SUGGESTED LIST OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT DPD - CONSULTATION OCTOBER 2018

MODIFICATION


MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION

LIKELY TO RESULT IN SIGNFICANT

CHANGES TO THE SA

LIKELY TO RESULT IN SIGNFICANT CHANGES

TO THE HRA

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 2: THE LOCAL PLAN FOR LANCASTER DISTRICT 2011 - 2031

CHAPTER 3: OBJECTIVES OF THE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT DPD

CHAPTER 4: CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS

CHAPTER 5: HOUSING

DM M16 Policy DM1Bullet Point I

The optimum housing capacity that can be achieved on individual sites;

Bullet point I

The optimum housing capacity that can be achieved on individual

sites; That land is used effectively in delivering housing needs;

To provide greater consistency with national planning

policy.MAIN No No

DM M17 Policy DM1

Bullet Point II

That individual sites maximise their contributions towards the delivery of a

wide range of affordable housing and, collectively, to assist in meeting

Lancaster District's identified housing needs and affordable housing target

of up to 40%;

Bullet Point II

That individual sites maximise their contribution towards the delivery

of a wide range of affordable housing and, collectively, to assist in

meeting Lancaster District's identified housing needs and affordable

housing target of up to 40% including for affordable housing ;

Viability evidence identifies that the level of affordable

housing that can be achieved varies in different parts of

the district.

MAIN No No

DM M23 Policy DM1

Criterion I

Ensure that available land is used effectively, taking into account the

characteristics of different locations and the specific circumstances of

individual sites including viability;

Criterion I

Ensure that available land is used effectively, taking into account the

characteristics of different locations and the specific circumstances of

individual sites, local market evidence and the specific circumstances

of individual sites including viability;

Remove reference to viability as the revised draft

national Planning Practice Guidance states that viability

should not need to be addressed at the application

stage.

MAIN No No

DM M24 Policy DM1

Criterion II

Are located where the natural environment, services and infrastructure can

or could be made to accommodate the impacts of development in

accordance with other relevant policies, particularly DM43.

Criterion II

Are located where the natural environment, services and

infrastructure can or could be made to accommodate the impacts of

development, conforms to the sustainable hierarchy of settlements

identified in SP1 and other relevant policies, particularly DM43.

Remove reference to natural environment as this may

give too strong a presumption that mitigation can be

provided where it may not be possible.

MAIN No No

DM M26 Policy DM1

Criterion III

Small schemes of fewer than 10 units where delivering a broad range of

housing may be limited by physical constraints.

Delete Criterion III

Small schemes of fewer than 10 units where delivering a broad range

of housing may be limited by physical constraints.

Each case will be considered on its own merits, where

physical constrains are significant this will be a material

consideration in decision making

MAIN No No

DM M28 Policy DM1

Final Paragraph

The precise mix of housing types and tenures will be agreed at the time of

application taking account of all relevant factors.

Delete Final Paragraph

The precise mix of housing types and tenures will be agreed at the

time of application taking account of all relevant factors.

Strengthen the importance of achieving a balanced mix

of housing across all sites.MAIN No No

DM M31 Policy DM2

Final Sentances of paragraph 5.23

There may be instances where it would not be appropriate to build to such

standards, this may for example include specific needs. Each case will be

determined on its own merits.

Final Sentances of paragraph 5.23

There may be instances where it would not be appropriate to build to

such standards, this may for example include specific needs. Each

case will be determined on its own merits.

To provide further clarity to this matter. MAIN No No

DM M32 Policy DM2

First Paragraph

The Council in accordance with national policy and practice guidance has

taken consideration of overall need and viability across the district and has

adopted to implement optional housing standards on new residential

development. Proposals for residential development will be supported

where:

First Paragraph

The Council in accordance with national policy and practice guidance

has taken consideration of overall need and viability across the

district and has adopted to implement optional housing standards on

new residential development. Proposals for residential development

will be supported where:


DM M34 Policy DM2

Third Paragraph

A flexible approach will be taken to the delivery of accessible and

adaptable dwellings under Building Regulation M4(2) where exceptional

circumstances are demonstrated, such circumstances could include site

topography or vulnerability to flooding.

Third Paragraph

A flexible approach will be taken to the delivery of accessible and

adaptable dwellings under Building Regulation M4(2) where

exceptional circumstances are demonstrated, such circumstances

could include site topography or vulnerability to flooding or where it

can be demonstrated to have a significant detrimental effect on

viability .


DM M41 Policy DM3

Schemes of fewer than 11 dwellings but exceed 1,000 square metres Gross

Internal Area will be expected to contribute towards affordable housing

through providing 20% of homes as affordable housing.

Schemes of fewer than 11 dwellings but exceed 1,000 square metres

Gross Internal Area will be expected to contribute towards affordable

housing through providing 20% of homes as affordable housing in

accordance with policy DM3.

At this stage it remains unclear whether the 1000m2

threshold is to be carried through in the NPPGMAIN No No

DM M43 Policy DM3

All other types of affordable housing as proposed to be introduced through

the emerging revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework will be

recognised within the district. However, the preferred means of delivering

intermediate tenure within the District is shared ownership housing or

intermediate rent.

Whilst the Council recognises all types of affordable housing as

defined by Annex 2 of the National Planning Policy Framework, the

preferred means of delivery for affordable housing for sale is shared

ownership. All other types of affordable housing as proposed to be

introduced through the emerging revisions to the National Planning

Policy Framework will be recognised within the district. However,

the preferred means of delivering intermediate tenure within the

District is shared ownership housing or intermediate rent.

To reflect the updated NPPF. MAIN No No

DM M44 Policy DM3

The Council requires rented affordable and social housing in all instances to

be delivered in partnership with Registered Providers, other than the

Government's proposed form of affordable housing known as affordable

private rent which is expected to be brought forward through Built to Rent

schemes which may be delivered by specialist companies. Given that the

Council requires a minimum of 50% nomination rights...

The Council requires rented affordable and social housing in all

instances to be delivered in partnership with Registered Providers.

Exceptions to this are for community led developments as classfied

under Policy DM12 and other thanthe Government's proposed form

of affordable housing known as affordable private rent which is

expected to be brought forward through Build to Rent schemes

which may be delivered by special companies.Given that t T he

Council requires a minimum of 50% nomination rights...


DM M46 Policy DM3

The replacement off-site affordable dwellings will be in addition to any

other affordable dwellings generated from any new market dwellings on

the alternative site.

The replacement off-site affordable dwellings will be in addition to

any other affordable dwellings generated from any new market

dwellings on both the original and the alternative site.


DM M48 Policy DM3

Affordable housing thresholds

Other than in the most exceptional circumstances or for schemes within

the West End Masterplan and Morecambe Area Action Plan boundaries,

new housing development must contribute towards the provision of

affordable housing and meet the requirements set out in the table below.

Affordable housing thresholds

With the exception of Other than in the most exceptional

circumstances or for schemes within the West End Masterplan and

Morecambe Area Action Plan boundaries, new housing development

must contribute towards the provision of affordable housing and

meet the requirements set out in the table below.


DM M49 Policy DM3

15 plus Urban Minimum 30% (Brownfield and Greenfield) up to 40%

(Greenfield) On site

11 plus Rural (excluding AONB’s) Minimum 30% (Brownfield and

Greenfield) up to 40% (Greenfield) On site

11 to 14 Urban Minimum 20% On site

Developments exceeding 1,000 sqm (Gross Internal Area) and under 11

units Urban/Rural Minimum 20% On site

Affordable housing requirements within the Arnside & Silverdale AONB are

identified within the Arnside & Silverdale AONB DPD and requirements for

Forest of Bowland AONB identified under Policy DM6 of this DPD.

15 plus Urban Minimum 30% (Brownfield and Greenfield) up to 40%

(Greenfield) On site

11 plus Rural (excluding AONB’s) Minimum 30% (Brownfield and

Greenfield) up to 40% (Greenfield) On site

11 to 14 Urban Minimum 20% On site

Developments exceeding 1,000 sqm (Gross Internal Area) and under

11 units Urban/Rural Minimum 20% On site

Reference Affordable Housing Target by Development Type

Lancaster and Carnforth and Rural West*

Greenfield 15 and over On site 30%

Greenfield 10-14 On site 20%

Brownfield 10 and over On site 20%

Morecambe, Heysham and Overton


Rural East**


Brownfield 10 and over On site 30%

Nil contribution will be sought on schemes of less than 10 units

outside of the districts two Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, nor

will any contribution be sought on schemes in any part of the district

which comprise solely of apartment led development, nor brownfield

development in Morecambe and Heysham.

* Rural West includes the wards of Halton with Aughton, Kellet,

Lower Lune Valley and Upper Lune Valley (excluding any part of the

Forest of Bowland AONB)

** Rural East includes the wards of Ellel and Bolton-with-Slyne

To reflect viability evidence MAIN No No

DM M51 Policy DM3

Criterion II

The form of provision, location within a site and the means of delivery will

be subject to negotiation at the time of a planning application. However,

close consideration of the latest available evidence will be required

including the most up to date Strategic Housing Market Assessment or

where there is an up-to-date village or parish housing needs assessment

that is a more appropriate indication of housing need.

Criterion II

The form of size, type, tenure provision, location within a site and the

means of delivery of affordable housing will accord with be subject

to negotiation at the time of a planning application. However, close

consideration of the latest available evidence will be required

including the most up to date Strategic Housing Market Assessment

or where there is an up-to-date village or parish housing needs

assessment where that is a more appropriate indication of housing

need, unless the exceptional circumstances identified in DM1 are

met.


DM M52 Policy DM3 Creation of a new bullet point in Policy DM3.

New bullet point VI

Where affordable housing is being delivered, the Council will seek to

ensure an appropriate tenure mix using the following percentages as

a guide (and sizes and types as set out in Policy DM1).

• 60% affordable/social rent and 40% intermediate tenure;

• 50% affordable or social rent and 50% intermediate tenure.

To strengthen the policy. MAIN No No

DM M56 Policy DM4 Creation of a new paragraph

Insert paragraph at end of first section of policy

All proposals should demonstrate how they accord with housing

needs for the relevant area identiifed in the Strategic Housing Market

Assessment (Part II) or successor studies.

To link development with evidenced housing needs MAIN No No

DM M58 Policy DM4Current sub-title

General Requirements for Rural Housing

Amend sub-title to read

General Requirements for Housing outside of the Main Urban AreasTo provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M59 Policy DM4

Criterion III

Be located where the environment and infrastructure can accommodate

the impacts of expansion.

Criterion III

Be located where the environment, services and infrastructure can or

could be made to accommodate the impacts of

development expansion.


DM M62 Policy DM5

Criterion IV

All homes are affordable in perpetuity, comply with the most up-to-date

definitions of affordable housing and are constructed to the most relevant

design and quality standards (at the time of delivery); and

Criterion IV

All homes are affordable in perpetuity, comply with the most up-to-

date definitions of affordable housing and are constructed to the

most relevant design and quality standards (at the time of delivery);

and


DM M64 Policy DM6

First Paragraph & Creation of new Sub Heading

Within the Forest of Bowland AONB, the number, size, types and tenures of

all homes provided should closely reflect identified local needs in

accordance with current housing needs evidence at the time of the

application, this includes the Strategic Housing Market Assessment and

other robust local housing needs assessments, for example, where there is

an up-to-date village or parish housing needs assessment that is agreed to

be a more appropriate indication of housing need.

First Paragraph & Creation of new Sub-Heading

Housing Development

Within the Forest of Bowland AONB, the number, size, types and

tenures of all homes provided should closely reflect identified local

needs in must accordance with the current identified local housing

needs evidence for the AONB at the time of the application. This

includes the Strategic Housing Market Assessment and other robust

local housing needs assessments,. fF or example, where there is an

up-to-date village or parish housing needs assessment that is agreed

to be a more appropriate indication of housing need.


DM M65 Policy DM6

Third Paragraph

Given the evidence of affordable need within the Forest of Bowland AONB,

proposals of two or more dwellings will be expected to provide a financial

contribution towards affordable housing in the form of a commuted sum in

lieu of on-site provision of affordable housing will be sought per unit of

affordable housing that would have been provided. Proposals for six or

more dwellings will be required to provide affordable housing on the

application site. Proposals will be expected to demonstrate that densities

make best and efficient use of land and reflect local settlement character.

Third Paragraph

Given the evidence of affordable need within the Forest of Bowland

AONB, proposals of two or more dwellings will be expected to

provide a financial contribution towards affordable housing in the

form of a commuted sum in lieu of on-site provision. of affordable

housing will be sought per unit of affordable housing required that

would have been provided. The financial contribution will be

calculated in accordance with the emerging Viability Protocol SPD.

Proposals for six or more dwellings will be required to provide

affordable housing on the application site. Proposals will be expected

to demonstrate that densities make best and efficient use of land and

reflect local settlement character.


DM M68 Policy DM7

Criterion II

Development proposals should be appropriate to the character of the local

area in terms of design, layout and materials used;

Criterion II

Development proposals are should be appropriate to the character

of the local area in terms of design, layout and materials used;


DM M69 Policy DM7Criterion III

Meet the criteria set out in Appendix G;

Criterion III

III. Ensuring suitable amenity standards in accordance with Meet the

criteria set out in Appendix G;


DM M70 Policy DM7

Criterion IV

Proposals should demonstrate that there will be no unacceptable impact

upon residential amenity in the surrounding area through issues such as

increased noise and disturbance;

Criterion IV

Proposals should demonstrate that there will be no unacceptable

impact upon residential amenity in the surrounding area through

issues such as increased noise and disturbance;


DM M71 Policy DM7

Criterion VI

Proposals should demonstrate that they would not lead to an unacceptable

increase in anti-social parking in the surrounding area;

Criterion VI

Proposals should demonstrate that they would not lead to an

unacceptable increase in anti-social parking in the surrounding area;


DM M72 Policy DM7

Criterion VII

Proposals should be designed to be safe and secure for their occupants

whilst respecting the character and permeability of the surrounding area;

and

Criterion VII

Proposals should be are designed to be safe and secure for their

occupants whilst respecting the character and permeability of the

surrounding area; and


DM M85 Policy DM11 Additional sentence to be included to the end of paragraph 5.88

Additional text to be included:

With regard to car parking, such facilities will only be required where

the scale or nature of the proposal is significant enough to generate

the need for car parking to be provided.


DM M86 Policy DM11

First Paragraph

The Council will support the provision of new additional moorings on

Lancaster Canal to meet evidenced and identified needs. Any proposals

will...

First Paragraph

The Council will support the provision of new additional moorings on

Lancaster Canal to meet evidenced and identified needs. Any

proposals will...


DM M87 Policy DM11

Criterion II

That appropriate facilities and servicing is provided for including refuse

disposal, sewerage disposal, a facilities building (which should incorporate

toilets, showers and a laundry facility) and re-fuelling facilities.

Criterion II

It can be demonstrated that appropriate facilities and servicing is

provided either on site or in close proximity to the site for including

refuse disposal, sewerage disposal, a facilities building (which should

incorporate toilets, showers and a laundry facility) and re-fuelling

facilities.


DM M92 Policy DM12

First Paragraph

Planning applications for self, custom or community-led housing, built by

individuals or groups of indvidiuals for their own occupation will be

supported by the Council where they are in sustainable locations.

First Paragraph

Planning applications for self, custom or community-led housing,

built by individuals or groups of indvidiuals for their own occupation

will be supported by the Council where they are in sustainable

locations in accordance with the settlement hierarchy set out under

Policy SP2 of the Strategic Policies & Land Allocations DPD.


DM M93 Policy DM12

Second Paragraph

Developers of strategic sites (sites and amount to be determined by the

outcomes of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment) will be encouraged

to make provision for a proportion of serviced plots of land to contribute

towards meeting the evidenced demand for self, custom or community-led

Housebuilding in the district.

Second Paragraph

Developers of strategic sites (sites and amount to be determined by

the outcomes of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment) will be

encouraged to make provision for a proportion of serviced plots of

land to contribute towards meeting the evidenced demand for self,

custom or community-led Housebuilding in the district.


DM M94 Policy DM13

Criterion II

Contribute towards the provision of affordable housing in accordance with

Policy DM3;

Criterion II

Contribute towards the provision of affordable housing in accordance

with Policy DM3;

To reduce repetition in the Local Plan MAIN No No

DM M96 Policy DM13 New criterion to be added and other criteria to be re-numbered

Criteiron IV

The proposal would not result in a unacceptable impact on parking,

including unacceptable levels of on-street parking; and


DM M97 Policy DM13

Second Paragraph

The City Council considers the importance of maintaining an appropriate

housing mix and safeguarding the character of residential areas to be an

important priority. In doing so, the Council have adopted an approach of a

general presumption against new housing in multiple occupation within the

district. Proposals which would lead to a concentration of more than 10%

of houses being classed as HMOs of the total housing stock within a 100m

radius will not be considered acceptable. This includes proposals for

changes of use to HMOs, or extensions to existing HMOs.

Second Paragraph

The City Council considers the importance of maintaining an

appropriate housing mix and safeguarding the character of

residential areas to be an important priorities y. In doing so, the

Council have adopted an approach of a general presumption against

new housing in multiple occupation within the district. Proposals

which would lead to a To prevent a concentration of more than 10%

of houses being classed as HMOs of the total housing stock within a

100m radius will not be considered acceptable. This includes

proposals for changes of use to HMOs, or extensions to existing

HMOs.



Criterion V

The proposal and the intensity of use will not undermine the

maintenance of a balanced and mixed local community;



Criterion VI

The proposal will not result in a C3 dwelling unit being sandwiched

between two HMO properties in a continuous frontage;


DM M102 Policy DM13

Criterion IX

The proposal would not result in the creation of sub-standard living

conditions.

Criterion IX

The proposal would not result in the creation of sub-standard living

conditions and will as a minimum accord with the Council's standards

for Houses in Multiple Occupation .


DM M103 Policy DM13

Final Sentence

Therefore proposals that fall outside of permitted development rights and

therefore require planning permission will not be accepted.

Final Sentence

Therefore pProposals which fall outside of permitted development

rights and therefore require planning permission will only be

considered acceptable where there is a low concentration of existing

HMO's and provide suitable living standards that fall outside of

permitted development rights and therefore require planning

permission will not be accepted.


DM M104 Policy DM13 New paragraph to be added following 5.101

Artcile 4(2) directions are a means of controlling smaller HMO's

where the Council consider this relevant in the interests of providing

balanced communities.


CHAPTER 6: EMPLOYENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

DM M106 Policy DM14

First Paragraph

Proposals for new employment premises should be located on allocated

employment sites, as identified…

First Paragraph

Proposals for new employment premises should preferably be

located on allocated employment sites, as idenitfied…

To provide consistency within the policy and the wider

plan.MAIN No No

DM M107 Policy DM14

Second Paragraph

Proposals for employment generating uses (B1, B2, B8 and appropriate sui

generis uses) that seek to utilise previously developed land or existing

premises outside of designated emplyoment areas will be supported by the

Council provided that the following issues are addressed:

Second Paragraph

Proposals for empyoment generating uses (B1, B2, B8 and

appropriate sui generis uses) that seek to utilise previously

developed land or existing premises outside of designated

emplyoment areas will be supported by the Council provided that the

following criteria are met issues are addressed:


plan.MAIN No No

DM M108 Policy DM14

Criterion I

That there is sufficient access and capacity in the local highway network to

achieve sufficient access and capacity) to accommodate the proposed use,

including provision for cycling and walking;

Criterion I

That tT here is sufficient access and capacity in the local highway

network (or improvements can be delivered as part of the proposal)

to achieve sufficient access and capacity) to accommodate the

proposed use, including provision for cycling and walking;


CHAPTER 7: TOWN CENTRES AND RETAILING

DM M122 Policy DM16

…will need to consider the development of larger retail units, but smaller

units and a greater mix of shops that 'promote competitive town centres

that provide customer choice and diverse retail offer and which reflects the

individuality of town centres' (Paragraph 23 of the the National Planning

Policy Framework) should be retained.

…will need to consider the development of larger retail units, but

smaller units and a greater mix of shops that seek to promote greater

customer choice and retail offer promote competitive town centres

that provide customer choice and diverse retail offer and which

reflects the individuality of town centres' (Paragraph 23 of the the

National Planning Policy Framework) should be retained. The Council

will support proposals for main town centre uses where they

compliment the existing independent character of the district's main

centres.


DM M124 Policy DM16

First Paragraph

Proposals for other main town centre uses (as defined in the National

Planning Policy Framework) will be supported where they are located

within the defined town centre boundary and accord with other policies

elsewhere in the Local Development Plan

First Paragraph

Proposals for other main town centre uses (as defined in the National

Planning Policy Framework) will be supported where they are located

within the defined town centre boundary and accord with other

policies elsewhere in the Local Development Plan

To provide greater clarity within the policy. MAIN No No

DM M125 Policy DM16 New First Paragraph with a series of criteria.

Proposals for main town centre uses (as defined in the National

Planning Policy Framework) will be supported where they meet the

following criteria:

I. They are located within the defined town centre boundary and

accord with other policies elsewhere in the Local Development Plan;

II. Do not adversely affect environmental, safety and amenity

considerations;

III. Where it can be demonstrated that the scale and type of

development proposed is directly related to the role and function of

the locality; and

IV. Where development contributes towards creating a strong sense

of place through high quality design.


DM M126 Policy DM16

Third Paragraph

Such proposals should include a separate and secure access, preferably to

the rear of the property, that does not result in a net loss of ground floor

retail space.

Third Paragraph

Such proposals should include a separate and secure access,

preferably to the rear of the property, that does not result in a net

loss of ground floor retail space.


plan.MAIN No No

DM M127 Policy DM16

Fourth Paragraph

Development proposals for main town centre uses will be supported in

town centre locations subject to environmental, safety and amenity

considerations where it can be demonstrated that the scale and type of

development proposed is directly related to the role and function of the

locality and contributes towards creating a strong sense of plance through

high quality design.

Fourth Paragraph

Development proposals for main town centre uses will be supported

in town centre locations subject to environmental, safety and

amenity considerations where it can be demonstrated that the scale

and type of development proposed is directly related to the role and

function of the locality and contributes towards creating a strong

sense of plance through high quality design.


DM M128 Policy DM16

Fifth Paragraph

Development proposals for retail development that are located between

the primary shopping area (PSA) and the town centre boundary will also be

supported where it is demonstrated that the proposal cannot be suitably

accommodated in the PSA and will bring positive economic regeneration

benefits.

Fifth Paragraph

Development proposals for retail development that are located

between the primary shopping area (PSA) and the town centre

boundary will also be supported where it is demonstrated that the

proposal cannot be suitably accommodated in the PSA and will bring

positive economic regeneration benefits.


DM M132 Policy DM16

Bullet Point 1

Over 500sqm in the Main Town centres of Lancaster, Morecambe and

Carforth or wihtin 800 metres of the defined town centre.

Bullet Point 1

The creation of Oo ver 500sqm (gross) retail floorspace within 800

metres of in the Main Town centres of Lancaster, Morecambe and

Carforth or wihtin 800 metres of the defined town centre.

To provide greater consistency within the Local Plan and

with evidence.MAIN No No

DM M133 Policy DM16

Bullet Point 2:

Over 200sqm within defined local centres (as set out in Policy TC3 of the

Strategic Policies & Land Allocations DPD) or within 800 metres of the

defined local centre.

Bullet Point 2:

The creation of Oo ver 200sqm (gross) retail floorspace within 800

metres of a within defined local centres (as set out in Policy TC1 3 of

the Strategic Policies & Land Allocations DPD) or within 800 metres

of the defined local centre.

To provide greater consistency within the Local Plan and

with evidence.MAIN No No

DM M138 Policy DM17

Secondary Retail Frontages

Within other key retail frontages the Council will seek to retain an

appropriate mix of 'A' Class uses whilst permitting a limited number of non-

A1 uses.

Secondary Retail Frontages

Within Secondary Retail other key retail fF rontages the Council will

seek to retain an appropriate mix of 'A' Class uses whilst supporting a

greater level of diversification permitting a limited number of

suitable non-A1 uses.


DM M139 Policy DM17

Criterion VI

Whether the proposed use of the ground floor would provide an active

frontage; and

Criterion VI

Whether the proposed use of the ground floor would provide an

active frontage during normal daytime trading hours ; and


DM M142 Policy DM18 Additional new paragraph added to the end of Policy DM18

Proposals which involve the conversion of retail units to residential

purposes will be supported where they are accompied by robust

marketing that has taken place over a reasonable period of time (at

least 12 months) that an ongoing retail use is no longer appropriate

or viable.


DM M149 Policy DM19Retail proposals that exceed 150sqm should be generally directed towards

defined town centres areas as identified in the Local Plan Policies Maps.

Retail proposals that exceed 150sqm should will be generally

directed towards defined town centres areas as identified in the

Local Plan Policies Maps. The cumulative impact of proposals will be

considered in terms of the implication on the vitality and viability of

defined centres in the locality.


plan.MAIN No No

DM M150 Policy DM20New paragraph to be added at the start of the section on Hot Food

Takeaways

National planning policy is clear that through both the plan-making

and decision taking processes the aim should be to deliver healthy,

inclusive and safe places which, particularly in relation to public

health, enable and support healthy lifestyles especially where this

addresses identified local health and wellbeing needs. Examples of

how this could be achieved include access to a healthier range of

food.


DM M151 Policy DM20Two new paragraphs and table to be added to the Hot Food Takeaway

Section

Lancashire County Council Public Health Team have prepared a Public

Health Advisory Note on ‘Hot Food Takeaways and Spatial Planning’

which was published in late 2017. This builds on direction given at a

national level and provides greater encouragement to local planning

authorities to manage the level of new hot food takeaways to stop

the proliferation of such uses which is particularly prevalent in areas

of deprivation. This is highlighted through the use of the FEAT

mapping tool in relation to the location of takeaways.

As Table 7.1 displays both Lancashire and Lancaster have significantly

more fast food outlets per 100,000 population than England. Fast

food outlets are defined as premises that prepare and supply food

that is available quickly covering a range of outlets including (but not

limited to) burger bars, kebab and chip shops, fish and chip and

sandwich shops. It excludes outlets classed as bakeries as well as

those to be considered cafes or restaurants. However, in the case of

large fast food chains, all outlets including those classified as cafes

and restaurants are included in the figures.

2012 2016 Difference

Count of Outlets Rate per 100,000 population Count of Outlets Rate

per 100,000 population Actual %

England 40,486 77.5 47,928 87.8 +7,442 16%

Lancashire 1,028 87.9 1,282 121.9 +254 20%

Lancaster 119 84.4 127 89.9 +8 6%

Table 7.1: Fast food outlet density in Lancashire and Lancaster and

comparisons between 2012 and 2016 (Source: Public Health England


DM M152 Policy DM20

Improving the health and wellbeing of communities in the district is a key

objective of the Local Plan, only way this can be achieved is to encourage

healthy eatin. Large concentrations of hot food takeaways within our

commercial centres and surrounding schools can have the opposition

effect by encouraging unhealthy eating habits. Obesity levels have

continued to rise in recent years with approximately 65% of adults in

Lancaster District classified as overwight or obese, 32% of chidren in the

district as similarly classed as overweight or obese.

Improving the health and wellbeing of communities in the district is a

key objective of the Local Plan, one ly way this can be achieved is to

encourage healthy eatin. Large concentrations of hot food takeaways

within our commercial centres and surrounding schools can have the

opposite ion effect by encouraging unhealthy eating habits.

Approximately 61.5% of adults in Lancaster District are clossified as

overwight or obese. Child excess weight is of particular concern as

excess weight in reception year has been significantly worse than the

England average for the past 3 years and currnently stands at 26.7%

for the district. 33.8% of year 6 children in the district are classified as

overwight or obese, and this figure has been increasing for the past

two years Obesity levels have continued to rise in recent years with

approximately 65% of adults in Lancaster District classified as

overwight or obese, 32% of chidren in the district as similarly classed

as overweight or obese.

To provide greater clarity on this matter. MAIN No No

DM M153 Policy DM20 New paragraphs to be added following paragraph 7.20.

In relation to obesity in children, the prevalence in reception year

hovers at around 10% and for several wards within the district the

figure more than doubles when compared to year 6 obesity

prevalence. Therefore the aim of this policy is to help assist in

reducing these levels and sets a ward level threshold of 15% for year

6 and 10% for reception year, over which proposals for further hot

food takeaways will be restricted.

In making decisionson hot food takeaways, the Council will have

regard to the content of the Public Health Advisory note and seek

advice and guidance from Lancashire County Council Public Health

team in relaiton to obesity levels within young people.


DM M156 Policy DM20Delete table relating to the number of hot-food takeaways in the district

and the final two paragraphs of this section.

Table 7.1: Table showing the Percentage of hot-food takeaways

within Lancaster District Centres

* Figure represents the total number of occupied in the Local Centre

Assessment (2017), Morecambe West End has a further 46 units

which are vacant.

7.23 Up-to-date data and information on the location of hot food

takeaways can be obtained by using the FEAT tool (www.feat-

tool.org.uk). Further guidance on this issue can also be found in ‘Hot

Food Takeaways and Spatial Planning – Public Health Advisory Note’

which has been prepared by Lancashire County Council Public Health

Team.

7.24 It is important that clusters or overall number of non-retail uses

should not dominate any defined centre which detract from its

vitality, viability and overall amenity of the area. Particular issues are

reported with the clustering of A5 (hot-food takeaways) and A2

(particularly betting shops) although any non-retail use could have a

similar impact in aggregate or where they take up large proportions

of frontage.


DM M157 Policy DM20 New paragraph to be added after paragraph 7.21

In terms of vitality and viability of centres, the Council believe that

similar impacts can arise from the over proliferation and clustering of

betting shops which can have a detrimental impact on the amenity of

the area.


DM M160 Policy DM21

Criterion II

Be appropriate to its setting and location and has due regard for local

distinctiveness;

Criterion II

Be appropriate to its setting and location and has due regard for local

distinctiveness;

Unnecessary repetition with criterion I MAIN No No

DM M161 Policy DM21

Criterion V

Not cause a visual intrusion by virtue of light pollution into adjoining

residential properties or unecessarily cause poorly directed light pollution

elsewhere.

Criterion V

Not cause a visual intrusion by virtue of light pollution into adjoining

residential properties, wider landscape / townscape or unecessarily

cause poorly directed light pollution elsewhere.


DM M162 Policy DM21Criterion VII

The architectural merit of the existing shopfront;

Criterion VII

The architectural merit of the existing shopfront and the character of

the wider area;


DM M163 Policy DM21Criterion VIII

The existing character of the area;

Criterion VIII

The existing character of the area;To reduce repetition within the policy. MAIN No No

DM M164 Policy DM21

Criterion IX

The suitability of the overall form, scale and architectural detail in relation

to the appearance of the building;

Criterion IX

The suitability of the overall form, materials, scale and architectural

detail in relation to the appearance of the building;


DM M165 Policy DM21

Criterion X

The suitability of materials in relaiton to the overall appearance of the

building.

Criterion X

The suitability of materials in relaiton to the overall appearance of

the building.


CHAPTER 8: LEISURE AND CULTURE

DM M167 Policy DM22

Criterion IV

…with its location and complies with other relevant policies within this

Development Management DPD; or

Criterion IV

…with its location and complies with other relevant policies within

this Development Management DPD; or


DM M171 Policy DM24Criterion I

The proposal should demonstrate that it will deliver…

Criterion I

The proposal should demonstrates that it will deliver…To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M172 Policy DM24Criterion III

The proposal should be located in an accessible suitable location…

Criterion III

The proposal is should be located in an accessible suitable location…To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M173 Policy DM24Criterion IV

The proposal should ensure that there is no damage…

Criterion IV

The proposal will should ensure that there is no damage…To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M175 Policy DM25

Criterion I

The design of development and management arrangements particularly

focusing on public safety, crime prevention and reduction of anti-social

beheviour where relevant;

Criterion I

The design of development and management arrangements protect

and improve particularly focusing on public safety, crime prevention

and reduction of anti-social beheviour where relevant;


DM M176 Policy DM25

Criterion V

…and amenity of the surrounding area, shops and services, particularly

through the creation of an active ground floor street frontage.

Criterion V

…and amenity of the surrounding area, shops and services, by

creating particularly through the creation of an active ground floor

street frontage.


DM M177 Policy DM27

Second Paragraph

Development proposals that are adjacent to designated open spaces will

be required to incorporate design measures that ensure that there are no

negative impacts on amenity, ecological value and functionality of the

space.

Second Paragraph

Amend paragraph to read: Development proposals that are adjacent

to designated open spaces will be required to incorporate design

measures that ensure that there are no negative impacts on amenity,

landscape value , ecological value and functionality of the space.


CHAPTER 9: EDUCATION AND SKILLS

CHAPTER 10: THE DESIGN OF DEVELOPMENT

DM M181 Policy DM29 Absent bullet point.

Include new bullet point

For every half-metre change in levels between properties, a further 1

metre of separation should be provided'


DM M183 Policy DM29

Second Bullet Point

For every half-metre change inlevels between properties, a further 1 metre

of separation should be provided.

Delete Second Bullet Point

For every half-metre change inlevels between properties, a further 1

metre of separation should be provided


DM M185 Policy DM29

First Paragraph

New developments should make a positive contribution to the surrounding

landscape or townscape. The

First paragraph amended to read

New developments should be as sustainable as possible and make a

positive contribution to the surrounding landscape and/ or

townscape.


DM M186 Policy DM29

Criterion III

Ensure that safety and security are fully considered through the design

process;'

Criterion III

Ensure that safety and security are fully considered through the

design process incorporating 'Secure by Design' principles and paying

attention to personal safety issues in all new development '


DM M187 Policy DM29 Accessibility sub-heading titleAmend Accessibility sub-heading title to 'Accessibility and Highway

Safety .To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M188 Policy DM29

Criterion XI

Deliver net gains in green infrastructure, retaiing and ehnahcing,

wherepossible, appropriate amounts of garden/outdoor space for

occupiers of both proposed and neighbouring uses;

Criterion XI

Provide green infrastructure by creating a range of open spaces and

habitats, providing appropriate amounts of garden / outdoors spaces

to deliver net gains Deliver net gains in green infrastructure, retaiing

and ehnahcing, wherepossible, appropriate amounts of

garden/outdoor space for occupiers of both proposed and

neighbouring uses;


DM M189 Policy DM29

Criterion XII

Provide sufficient landscaping areas/buffer zoes and appropriate levels of

open space provision to mitigate development impacts on adjoining

sensitive uses and the open countryside;

Criterion XII

Provide appropriate and effective sufficient landscaping, landscape

buffer zones areas/buffer zoes and appropriate levels of open space

to enhance the appearance of the development, and mitigate the

impact on surrounding users and the townscape and landscape

provision to mitigate development impacts on adjoining sensitive

uses and the open countryside;


DM M190 Policy DM29

Criterion XVIII

Incorporate electric vehicle charging points in line with the guidance

contained within Policy DM31 and the forthcoming Supplementary

Planning Document on this matter;'

Delete criteria XVIII)

Incorporate electric vehicle charging points in line with the guidance

contained within Policy DM31 and the forthcoming Supplementary

Planning Document on this matter;

Criteria has been moved to Policy DM30 Sustainable

DesignMAIN No No

DM M191 Policy DM29


Where major development proposals are likely, due to their size and scale,

to have an adverse impact on the local and built environment, the Council

will expect applicants to make use of local Design Panels to assess such

impacts at the pre-application stage. The views and recommendations of

Design Panels will be given due consideration in the decision making

process.

Penultimate Paragraph:

Where major development proposals are likely, due to their size,

location and scale, to have an adverse impact on the local and built

environment, the Council will expect applicants to make use of local

Design Panels to assess such impacts at the pre-application stage.

The views and recommendations of Design Panels will be given due

consideration in the decision making process.


DM M192 Policy DM29

In accordance with paragraph 62 of the National Planning Policy

Framework (the Framework) the Council will utilise Design Review Panels

to assess the impacts of major development proposals, particularly those

which due to their size, scale and location may have adverse impacts on

their surroundings. The views and recommendations of these panels will be

given due consideration in determining a planning application

Amend paragraph to read


Framework (the Framework) NPPF the Council will utilise Design

Review Panels to assess the impacts of major development

proposals, particularly those which due to their size, scale and

location may have adverse impacts on their surroundings. The views

and recommendations of these panels will be given due

consideration in determining a planning applications. The Council

would encourage development proposals on gateway sites, other

prominent sites (especially in Conservation Areas or Areas of

Outstanding Natural Beauty) and city centre sites, to be assessed by

the regional Places Matter Design Review Panel before submitting a

planning application but after engaging with the Council through its

pre-application service to ensure that the principle of the proposal

and the development parameters are acceptable. This will ensure

valuable design feedback on proposals and allow opportunity for

improvements ahead of submission, helping improve the quality of

buildings and places.


DM M193 Policy DM30

Criterion IV

Account of landform, layout, building orientation, massing and landscaping

to minimise energy, water consumption and water efficency measures;

Criterion IV

Account of landform, layout, building orientation, massing and

landscaping to minimise energy, and water consumption and water

efficency measures;


DM M194 Policy DM30 Absent criteria

Include new criteria 'Incorporate electric vehicle charging points in

line with the guidance contained within Policy DM31 and the

forthcoming Supplementary Planning Document on this matter' .

Criteria is better related to Policy DM30 MAIN No No

DM M195 Policy DM30

Criteria VI

The re-use of existing resources (including the conversion of existing

buildings) where this would be 'fit for purpose'.

Criteria VI

The re-use of existing resources and traditional materials (including

the conversion of existing buildings) where this would be 'fit for

purpose'


DM M197 Policy DM31 To delete Policy DM31 and to replace with new text.

To delete Policy DM31 and to replace with new text.

Due to the comprehensive nature of this suggested modification

these changes proposed are not highlighted in this modification list

but can be viewed in the accompanying tracked-changed

Development Management DPD.

To reflect current position on this matter and to ensure

that the policy prepared is sound and robust moving

forward.

MAIN Yes No

DM M198 Policy DM33 Inclusion of a further sentence at the end of paragraph 10.31.

Further sentence to read

There are currently no Critical Drainage Areas within the District.

However, the Council will continue to work with the Lead Local Flood

Authority and the Envrionment Agency, to peridoically consider the

need and appropriateness of this position.


DM M201 Policy DM33

The Council will seek to ensure that new development does not increase

flood risk through steering development to areas at lowest risk. Where this

cannot be achieved the Council will expect proposals to include

appropriate mitigation measures to effectively deal with flood risk. . One

method of how flood risk can be mitigated is through the use of

Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) to manage surface water flows. SuDS

can also assist in pollution control through improved filtration and habitat

creation within developments.

The Council will seek to ensure that new development does not

increase flood risk through steering development to areas at lowest

risk. Where this cannot be achieved the Council will expect proposals

to include appropriate mitigation measures to effectively deal with

flood risk. . One method of how flood risk can be mitigated is through

the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) to manage surface

water flows. SuDS can also assist in pollution control through

improved filtration and habitat creation within developments. apply

a sequential approach to new development by directing new

development to areas at the lowest risk of flooding, this includes

where necessary the direct application of the sequential test, and if

required the exception test. In exceptional circumstances where

development is considered acceptable in areas at higher risk of

flooding the Council will expect development proposals to incorporate

appropriate measures which mitigate effectively the flood risk.


DM M205 Policy DM33

Criterion II

That they are supported by an appropriate site-specific Flood Risk

Assessment (FRA) which demonstrates that the proposal meeting the

requirements of the Framework and NPPG;

Criterion II:

That they are supported by an appropriate site-specific Flood Risk

Assessment (FRA) which demonstrates that the proposal meeting the

requirements of the Framework and NPPG That they are supported

by a satisfactory and appropriate site specific Flood Risk Assessment

(FRA), including an assessment of surface water flood risk, which

demonstrates that the proposal meets the requirements of the

National Planning Policy Framework and NPPG;


DM M206 Policy DM33

Criterion III

That safe, suitable and appropriate flood prevention and mitigation

measures are agreed, implemented and maintained, including through

design and layout, taking Climate Change into account, to ensure that

development is appropriately flood resilient and resistant for its lifetime;

Criterion III moved to Criterion IV and amended to read:

Where proposals meet Criterion II of this Policy, that safe, suitable

and appropriate flood prevention and mitigation measures are

agreed, implemented and maintained, including through design and

layout, taking Climate Change into account, to ensure that

development is appropriately flood resilient and resistant for its

lifetime;


DM M210 Policy DM33

The National Planning Guidance (NPPG) formally published by the

Government in 2014 sets out a full range of guidance on matters relating to

flood risk. Development proposals in areas that are vulnerable to flood risk

should take account of the guidance covered in the NPPG, ensuring that

matters such as providing a flood risk assessment, addressing the

sequential and exceptions test have been demonstrated through the

applications process.

The National Planning Guidance (NPPG) formally published by the

Government in 2014 sets out a full range of guidance on matters

relating to flood risk. Development proposals in areas that are

vulnerable to flood risk should take account of the guidance covered

in the NPPG, ensuring that matters such as providing a flood risk

assessment, addressing the sequential and exceptions test have been

demonstrated through the applications process.

To avoid unnecessary repetition within the Policy. MAIN No No

DM M212 Policy DM34

First Paragraph First Sentence

Surface water should be managed sustainably within new development.

The Council expects that proposals for all new development will use of

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in accordance with the Surface Water

Drainage Hierarchy.

First Paragraph First Sentence

Surface water should be managed sustainably within new

development to ensure that the development does not result in a risk

of surface water flooding to property on or off the site . The Council

expects that proposals for all new development will use development

will incorporate Sustainable urban Drainage Systems in accordance

with the Surface Water Drainage Hierarchy set out below:

A. Into the ground (inflitration at source);

B. To a surface water body;

C. To a surface water sewer, or other suitable surface water drainage

system;

D. To a combined sewer.

Where it is not proposed to use infiltration, applicants will be

required to demonstrate why there is no reasonably practicable

design solution.


DM M213 Policy DM34

Second Paragraph

Proposals for all new development should implement sustainable drainage

systems, alternatives will only be permitted where it has been

demonstrated to be inappropriate or impracticable.

Second Paragraph

Proposals for all new development should implement sustainable

drainage systems, alternatives will only be permitted where it has

been demonstrated to be inappropriate or impracticable.

To avoid unnecessary repetition within the Policy. MAIN No No

DM M214 Policy DM34

Third Paragraph

Sustainable drainage systems should be designed with due regard to the

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs technical standards

(2015) or any future replacement.

Third Paragraph

Sustainable drainage systems should be designed with due regard to

the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs technical

standards (2015) or any future replacement.


DM M215 Policy DM34 Inclusion of a further paragraph within Policy DM34

Include the following paragraph after the third paragraph:

Where there is no alternative option but to discharge surface water

to a combined sewer, applicants will need to demonstrate why there

is no alternative and submit clear evidence that the discharge of

surface water will be limited to an attenuated “greenfield runoff”

rate, including an allowance for climate change and urban creep,

agreed with the appropriate bodies.


DM M216 Policy DM34

All proposals for major development will require a drainage strategy to be

submitted. The drainage strategy must show the type of drainage system

and/or measures proposed, how minimum standards of operation are

appropriate and that clear arrangements are in place for ongoing

maintenance over the lifetime of the development.

All proposals for major development will require a drainage strategy

to be submitted. The drainage strategy must show the type of

drainage system and/or measures proposed, how minimum

standards of operation are appropriate and that clear arrangements

are in place for ongoing maintenance over the lifetime of the

development.


DM M217 Policy DM34 Additional paragraphs to be added to the end of Policy DM34

Drainage strategies and schemes should be based on evidence of an

assessment of site conditions undertaken by a competent qualified

person/body and sustainable drainage systems should be designed

with due regard to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural

Affairs technical standards (2015) or any future replacement.

Surface water shall be attenuated on site. Wherever possible runoff

from developments shall be managed on the surface, including

circumstances where the final discharge may be to a lower hierarchy

(B to D above). Where below ground systems are proposed

Applicants will need to demonstrate why there is no reasonably

practicable design solution.

To strengthen the policy and to provide consistency with

national planning guidance.MAIN No No

DM M218 Policy DM34

Any drainage proposal will be expected to be part of a site-wide strategy to

avoid piecemeal development and demonstrate how the site delivers

sustainable drainage as part of interconnecting phases.

Any drainage proposal will be expected to be part of a site-wide

strategy to avoid piecemeal development and demonstrate how the

site delivers sustainable drainage as part of interconnecting phases,

and will be provided early in a development in order not to cause

issues whilst partially developed .


DM M219 Policy DM34

Approved schemes will be expected to be supplemented by appropriate

maintenance and management regimes for the lifetime of any surface

water drainage schemes which will be secured by planning condition.

Approved schemes SuDS that are not adopted by public bodie s will

be expected to be supplemented by appropriate maintenance and

management regimes for the lifetime of any surface water drainage

schemes which will be secured by planning condition or planning

obligation .


DM M220 Policy DM35

First Paragraph

Development proposals must take into account the demand for off-site

water service infrastructure. In particular, developers will be required to

demonstrate that there is adequate waste water capacity on and off the

site to satisfactorily serve the development.

First Paragraph

Development proposals must take into account the demand for off-

site water service infrastructure. In particular, developers will be

required to demonstrate that there is adequate waste water capacity

on and off the site to satisfactorily serve the development.


plan.MAIN No No

DM M221 Policy DM35

Second Paragraph

New development must demonstrate adherence to the National Planning

Practice Guidance (water supply, wastewater and water quality) hierarchy

of provision of sewerage infrastructure, this includes:

Second Paragraph

New development must demonstrate adherence to the National

Planning Policy Practice Guidance (water supply, wastewater and

water quality) hierarchy of provision of sewerage infrastructure, this

includes the following prioritised hierarchy :

A. Connection to a public sewer;

B. A package sewerage treatment plant; or lastly

C. The provision of septic tanks.


DM M222 Policy DM35


Water efficiency measures should be incorporated into the development.

The design of non-residential building development should enable

achievement of the BREEAM ‘Excellent’ standard.


Water efficiency measures should be incorporated into the

development. The design of non-residential building development

should enable achievement of the BREEAM ‘Excellent’ standard.

More relevant to DM30, viability not considered to exist

to promote BREEAM excellent in non residential

development

MAIN No No

DM M223 Policy DM35 Further text to be added before the third bullet point.

Further text to be added as a paragraph before bullet point reads:

For major development proposals contact should be made with

Lancashire County Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority in order

to assess the surface water drainage requirements and flood risk of

the development both on and off site. All developers are also

therefore encouraged to contact...


DM M224 Policy DM35 Delete paragraphs 10.57 to 10.59. Delete paragraphs 10.57 to 10.59.To avoid unnecessary repetition within the Policy and

wider plan.MAIN No No

CHAPTER 11: THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT

DM M228 Policy DM37 Additional paragraph to be added to the start of Policy DM37.

Proposals affecting listed buildings should conserve and enhance

those elements which contribute to its significance. All proposals

should be based on a thorough understanding of the building's

significance.

To provide greater clarity and consistency within the

document.MAIN No No

DM M229 Policy DM37

First Paragraph

The significance of a Designated Heritage Asset can be harmed or lost

through alteration or destruction of a Listed Building or through

development within its setting. Where a development proposal will lead to

substantial harm or loss of significance consent will be refused.

First Paragraph

The significance of a Designated Heritage Asset Listed Building can be

harmed or lost through alteration or destruction of those elements

which contribute to the special interest and character of the listed

building a Listed Building or through development within its setting.

Harm to such elements will only be permitted where this is clearly

justified and outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal.

Where a development proposal will lead to substantial harm or loss

of significance consent will be refused.


document.MAIN No No

DM M230 Policy DM37

Second Paragraph

Demolition of Listed Buildings

Proposals that involve substantial harm to or total loss of significant of

Listed buildngs including demolition will not be permitted unless it can be

demonstrated that the substantial harm or loss is necessary to achieve

overriding public benefits that outweigh that harm or loss. The following

criteria as set out in Paragraph 133 of the National Planning Policy

Framework will apply:

Second Paragraph

Demolition of Listed Buildings

Proposals that involve sS ubstantial harm to or total loss of significant

of Listed the listed buildngs including demolition will not be

permitted only in exceptional circumstances where unless it can be

demonstrated that the substantial harm or loss is necessary to

achieve overriding substantial public benefits that outweigh that

harm or loss. The following criteria as set out in Paragraph 195 33 of

the National Planning Policy Framework will apply:


document.MAIN No No

DM M231 Policy DM37Criterion I

The nature of the heritage asset prevents all reasonable uses of the site;

Criterion I

The nature of the heritage asset prevents all reasonable uses of the

site; and


document.MAIN No No

DM M232 Policy DM37

Criterion II

That no viable use of the heritage asset itself can be found in the medium

term through appropriate marketing that will enable its conservation;

Criterion II

That no viable use of the heritage asset itself can be found in the

medium term through appropriate marketing that will enable its

conservation; and


document.MAIN No No

DM M233 Policy DM37

Criterion III

That conservation through grant-funding or some form of charitable or

public ownership is demonstrably not possible; and

Criterion III

That conservation through grant-funding or some form of not for

profit, charitable or public ownership is demonstrably not possible;

and


document.MAIN No No

DM M234 Policy DM37

Extensions and Alterations to Listed Buildings

Proposals that involve the alterations or extensions to Listed Builldings,

including any partial demolitions, should be based on an accurate

understanding of the significance of the asset and the impact of the

proposal on this site.

Proposals that involve external and/or internal alterations to a Listed

Building would have an adverse impact on the special architectural or

historic character of the building and/or their surroundings will not be

permitted. The loss of historic fabric simply to accommodate new will not

be permitted.

New extensions that dominate or distract from the Listed building in terms

of siting, style, scale, massing, height or materials used will not be

supported by the Council. Reversibility and minimal intervention will also

be a key consideration when assessing proposals.

Where proposals will lead to less that substantial harm to the significant of

the Listed building, this harm should be outweighed by the public benefits

of the proposal which includes securing its optimal viable use.

Extensions and Alterations to Listed Buildings

Proposals that involve the alterations or extensions to Listed

Builldings, including any partial demolitions, should be based on an

accurate understanding of the significance of the asset and the

impact of the proposal on this site.

Proposals that involve external and/or internal alterations to a Listed

Building would have an adverse impact on the special architectural or

historic character of the building and/or their surroundings will not

be permitted. The loss of historic fabric simply to accommodate new

will not be permitted.

New extensions that dominate or distract from the Listed building in

terms of siting, style, scale, massing, height or materials used will not

be supported by the Council. Reversibility and minimal intervention

will also be a key consideration when assessing proposals.

Where proposals will lead to less that substantial harm to the

significant of the Listed building, this harm should be outweighed by

the public benefits of the proposal which includes securing its

optimal viable use.


document.MAIN No No

DM M235 Policy DM37

Changes of Use and Conversions to Listed Buildings

Where planning permission may not be normally granted for the

conversion of Listed buildings to alternative uses, favourbale consideration

may be accorded to schemes which represent the most appropriate way of

conserving the building and its architectural and historic significance and

setting.

Changes of Use and Conversions to Listed Buildings

Where planning permission may not be normally granted for the

conversion of Listed buildings to alternative uses, favourbale

consideration may be accorded to schemes which represent the most

appropriate way of conserving the building and its architectural and

historic significance and setting.


document.MAIN No No

DM M236 Policy DM37

Eighth Paragraph

Listed Buildings and Climate Change

The Council will support proposals that seek to reduce the carbon footprint

of a Listed Building provided that it respects the historic fabric, character

and setting of the building. Development involving the installation of

renewable energy equipment on a Listed building will be acceptable

provided the following criteria are met:

Eighth Paragraph

Listed Buildings and Climate Change

The Council will support proposals that seek to reduce the carbon

footprint of a Listed Building provided that it does not harm elements

that contribute towards the significance, respects the historic fabric,

character and setting of the building. Development involving the

installation of renewable energy equipment on a Listed building will

be acceptable provided the following criteria are met:


document.MAIN No No

DM M237 Policy DM37 Creation of a new paragrpah to follow the eighth paragraph.

Development involving the installation of renewable energy

equipment on a Listed building will be permitted where it conserves

those elements which contribute to its significance and that all of the

following criteria have been addressed as part of the design and

access statement / heritage statement:


document.MAIN No No

DM M238 Policy DM37

Criterion V

The energy efficiency of the Listed building itself has been first appraised

and suitable measures, which will not effect its character, have already

been undertaken;

Criterion V

The energy efficiency of the Listed building itself has been first

appraised and suitable measures, which will not effect its

significance character, have already been undertaken;


document.MAIN No No

DM M239 Policy DM37

Criterion VIII

The locations of equipment on the Listed building would not detract from

its character or appearance, either when viewed in close proximity or from

a distance; and

Criterion VIII

The locations of equipment on the Listed building would not detract

from elements that contribute towards its significance its character

or appearance, either when viewed in close proximity or from a

distance; and


document.MAIN No No

DM M240 Policy DM37 New paragraphs to be added to the end of Policy DM37

Information to Support an Application

Permission will not be granted for applications which are not fully

justified and accompanied by full information necessary to assess the

impact of the proposals on the Listed building.

Proposals should be accompanied by a statement of significance

which should form part of the heritage assessment (which may form

part of the design and access statement) to demonstrate that the

architectural and historic interest of the structure has been

understood and accounted for in any proposals.

Where permission is granted for development which would result in

the total or partial loss of a Listed building, approval will be

conditional upon the asset being fully recorded and the record

deposited with the Historic Environmental Record (HER).

Buildings at Risk

Proposals which will help to safeguard the significance of and secure

a sustainable future for the district's heritage assets, especially those

identified as being at greatest risk of loss or decay, will be supported.


document.MAIN No No

DM M241 Policy DM38

First Paragraph

Only development that preserves or enhances the character and

appearance of the Conservation Areas will be permitted.

First Paragraph

Only Any development proposals and/or alterations to buildings,

features and open spaces in conservation areas should that preserves

or enhances the special character and appearance of the

Conservation Area. s will be permitted. Specifically, they will be

required to demonstrate that:


document.MAIN No No

DM M242 Policy DM38

Second Paragraph

Outline applications for development wihtin Conservation Areas will not be

encouraged as details of development would be fundemental in

determining impact upon the heritage asset.

Second Paragraph

Outline applications for development wihtin Conservation Areas will

not be encouraged as details of development would be fundemental

in determining impact upon the heritage asset.


document.MAIN No No

DM M243 Policy DM38

Demolition of Buildings within Conservation Areas

Proposals that involve the loss of a building (or other element) which

makes a positive contribution to the significance of the Conservaiton Area

will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that the substantial

loss or harm is necessary to achieve substantial public benefits that

outweigh the harm or loss. All the criteria which are set out wihtin

paragraph 133 of the National Planning Policy Farmework should be met.

Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial harm to

the significance of the Conservation Area, this harm should be weighed

against the public benefits of the proposal, including securing its optimum

viable use.

No loss will be permitted without taking all reasonable setps to ensure that

the new development will immediately proceed after the loss has occured.

Demolition of Buildings within Conservation Areas

Proposals that involve the loss of a building (or other element) which

makes a positive contribution to the significance of the Conservaiton

Area will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that the

substantial loss or harm is necessary to achieve substantial public

benefits that outweigh the harm or loss. All the criteria which are set

out wihtin paragraph 133 of the National Planning Policy Farmework

should be met.

Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial

harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, this harm should

be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, including

securing its optimum viable use.

No loss will be permitted without taking all reasonable setps to

ensure that the new development will immediately proceed after the

loss has occured.


document.MAIN No No

DM M244 Policy DM38

Development within Conservation Areas

Development proposals for the re-use, alteration and extension of existing

buildings or the creation of new buildings within Conservation Areas will

only permitted where it has been demonstrated that:

Development within Conservation Areas

Development proposals for the re-use, alteration and extension of

existing buildings or the creation of new buildings within

Conservation Areas will only permitted where it has been

demonstrated that:


document.MAIN No No

DM M245 Policy DM38 New criterion II to be added.

Criterion II

Proposals will not have an unacceptable impact on the historic street

patterns / boundaries, open spaces, roofscape, skyline and setting

including important views into and out of the area; and


document.MAIN No No

DM M246 Policy DM38 New paragraphs to be added after criterion IV.

Outline applications for development within conservation areas will

not be permitted as it is expected that a full assessment will be

required of the impact that the proposal makes on elements that

contribute to the area's significance and understanding.

There will be a presumption in favour of the retention of buildings

and/or features which make a positive contribution to the special

character and appearance of a conservation area (as identified within

the conservation area appraisal).

Demolition will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that

the substantial loss or harm is necessary to achieve substantial public

benefits that outweigh the harm or loss. All the criteria which are set

out within paragraph 133 of the National Planning Policy Framework

should be met.

Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial

harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, this harm should

be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, including

securing its optimum viable use.

No loss will be permitted without taking all reasonable setps to

ensure that the new development will immediately proceed after the

loss has occurred.


document.MAIN No No

DM M247 Policy DM38


All proposals that are located wihtin a Conservation Area or its setting

should give due consideration to all relevant policies wihtin the

Development Management DPD development.


All proposals that are located wihtin a Conservation Area or its

setting must be accompanied by a clear heritage statement providing

details of the proposed development and its impact. They should give

due consideration to all relevant policies wihtin the Development

Management DPD development.


document.MAIN No No

DM M248 Policy DM39

First Paragraph

The Council recognises the significance of the setting to a heritage assets.

Propsoals that fail to preserve or enhance the setting of a designated

heritage asset will not be supported.

First paragraph

The Council recognises the contribution that significance of the

setting of to a heritage assets can make to its significance . Propsoals

that fail to preserve or enhance the setting of a designated heritage

asset will not be supported. This includes listed buildings, scheduled

monuments, registed parks and gardens and conservation areas.


document.MAIN No No

DM M249 Policy DM39

Second Paragraph

Development proposals that make a positive contribution to or better

reveal the significance of the asset and its setting will be favourably

considered.

Second Paragraph

Development proposals which that make a positive contribution to

or better reveal the significance of the asset through and its setting

will be favourably considered.


document.MAIN No No

DM M250 Policy DM39 New paragraphs to be added after Second Paragraph

Harm to their setting will only be permitted where this is clearly

justified and outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal.

Substantial harm to or total loss of significance of the Listed building

will be permitted only in exceptional circumstances and where it can

be demonstrated that the substantial harm or loss is necessary to

acheive substantial public benefits that outweigh that harm or loss.

The criteria set out in Paragraph 195 of the National Planning Policy

Framework will apply.


document.MAIN No No

DM M251 Policy DM39

Third Paragraph

The greater the negative impact on the significance of the designated

heritage asset and its setting, the greater the benefits that would be

required to justify any approval.

Third Paragraph

The greater the negative impact on the significance of the designated

heritage asset and its setting, the greater the benefits that would be

required to justify any approval.


document.MAIN No No

DM M252 Policy DM39Step 2: Assess whetherm how and to what degree these settings make a

contribution to the significance of the heritage asset(s);

Step 2: Assess whetherm how and to what degree these settings

make a contribution to the significance of the heritage asset(s) or

allow significance to be appreciated ;


document.MAIN No No

DM M253 Policy DM39Step 3: assess the effects of the proposed development, whether beneficial

or harnful, on the significance; and

Step 3: assess the effects of the proposed development, whether

beneficial or harnful, on the significance or on the ability to

appreciate it. This will include consideration of the following: ; and

-Location and siting of development (e.g. proximity to asset and

position in relation to key views to, from and across);

-Form and appearance of development (e.g. prominence, dominance

or conspicuousness, dimensions, scale, massing, visual permeability,

materials and the introduction of movement or activity);

-Wider effects of the development (e.g. changes to built surroudings

and spaces, change to skyline and lighting effects and 'light spill');

and

- Permanence of the development (e.g. anticipated lifetime /

temporariness and reversability).


document.MAIN No No

DM M254 Policy DM39 New paragraphs to be added to the end of Policy DM39.

All proposals which would impact upon the setting of a designated

heritage asset must be accompanied by a clear heritage statement

providing details of the proposed development and the assessment

outlined in this Policy. They should give due consideration to all

relevant policies within the Development Management DPD.

Where appropriate, the Council will make use of Desgin Panels in

determining that proposals are of the highest design standards and

mitigate any impacts on the surrounding historic environment.


document.MAIN No No

DM M255 Policy DM40 New paragraphs to be added to the start of Policy DM40

Where a non-designated heritage asset is affected by development

proposals, the effect of the application on its significance will be

taken into account, and there will be a presumption in favour of

conserving and enhancing those elements which contribute to its

significance.

All proposals which would impact upon a non-designated heritage

asset must be accompanied by a clear heritage statement describing

the significance of the heritage asset, including any contribution

made by its setting, as well as providing details of the proposed

development and its impact.

The scale of harm or the loss of that significance will be weighed

against the public benefits of the proposal, including securing its


document.MAIN No No

DM M256 Policy DM40

First Paragraph

Where a non-desginated heritage asset is affected by development

proposals, there will be a presumption in favour of its retention. Any loss of

the whole or part of such an asset…

First Paragraph

Where a non-desginated heritage asset is affected by development

proposals, there will be a presumption in favour of its retention. Any

loss of the whole or part of such an asset…


document.MAIN No No

DM M257 Policy DM40

Second Paragraph

Any special features that contribute to an asset's significance should be

retained and reinstated, where possible, in accordance with paragraph 135

of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Second Paragraph

Any special features that contribute to an asset's significance should

be retained and reinstated, where possible, in accordance with

paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework.


DM M258 Policy DM40


Proposals within the setting of a non-designated heritage asset will be

required to give due consideration to its significance and ensure that this is

protected or enhanced where possible.


Proposals within the setting of a non-designated heritage asset will

be required to give due consideration to its significance and ensure

that this is conserved protected or enhanced where possible.


document.MAIN No No

DM M259 Policy DM40 New paragraph to be added to the end of Policy DM40

Where appropriate, the Council will make use of Design Panels in

determining that proposals are of the highest design standards and

mitigate any impacts on the surrounding historic environment.


document.MAIN No No

DM M260 Policy DM41 New paragraphs to be added to the start of Policy DM41.

Development proposals should conserve and enhance those elements

which contribute towards the significance of a scheduled monument

or an archaeological site of national importance. Harm to such

elements will only be permitted where it is clearly justified and

outweighed by the benefits of the proposal. Substantial harm or total

loss of the significance of a scheduled monument or a site of

nationally significance will be permitted only in exceptional

circumstances.

Proposals affecting archaeological sites of less than national

importance shouls conserve those elements which contribute to their

significance in line wiht the importance of the remains.

Where development affecting such sites is acceptable in principle, the

Council will ensure mitigation of damage through preservation of the

remains in situ as a preferred solition. When in situ preservation is

not justified, the developer will be required to make adequate

provision for excavation and recording before or during development.

Subsequent analysis, publication and dissemination of the findings

will be required to be submitted to the local planning authority and

deposited with the Historic Environment Record. The ability to record

should not be a factor in deciding whether such a loss should be

permitted.


document and to reflect updates to national planning

policy.

MAIN No No

DM M261 Policy DM41

First Paragraph

Development proposals that would have an adverse impact on nationally

significant archaeolgical assets or their settings (whether scheduled or not)

will not be permitted.

First Paragraph

Development proposals that would have an adverse impact on

nationally significant archaeolgical assets or their settings (whether

scheduled or not) will not be permitted.



policy.

MAIN No No

DM M262 Policy DM41

Third Paragraph

Where development affecting such sites is acceptable in principle, the

Council will ensure mitigation of damage through preservation of remains

in situ as a preferred option.

Third Paragraph

Where development affecting such sites is acceptable in principle,

the Council will ensure mitigation of damage through preservation of

remains in situ as a preferred option.



policy.

MAIN No No

DM M263 Policy DM41

Fourth Paragraph

The Council will seek the preservation of archaeological assets unless it is

not justified (for example where the need for development outweighs the

importance of the asset). In these circumstances, the development will not

be permitted to commence until satisfactory provision has been made for a

programme of investigation and recording. However, the ability to record

should not be a factor in deciding whether such a loss should be permitted.

Fourth Paragraph

The Council will seek the preservation of archaeological assets unless

it is not justified (for example where the need for development

outweighs the importance of the asset). In these circumstances, the

development will not be permitted to commence until satisfactory

provision has been made for a programme of investigation and

recording. However, the ability to record should not be a factor in

deciding whether such a loss should be permitted.



policy.

MAIN No No

CHAPTER 12: THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

DM M266 Policy DM42

Final sentence of second paragraph

Development proposals should seek to integrate green spaces and green

corridors into development proposdals and forge linkages with existing

green space networks.

Amend final sentence of the last paragraph

Development proposals should seek to integrate designated green

spaces and green corridors into development proposdals and forge

linkages with existing green space networks


DM M268 Policy DM42

Third paragraph 'In exceptional circumstances, the loss of green spaces and

green corridors will only be acceptable where appropriate mitigation

measures are provided'

Amend third paragraph to read 'In exceptional circumstances, tT he

loss of green spaces and green corridors will only be acceptable

where appropriate mitigation measures are provided'


DM M269 Policy DM42 New sentence to be added to the fourth paragraph

Fourth Paragraph to read

…appropriate mitigation measures are provided. Development,

wherever possible, should enhance green space and green corridor

provision which assimilate into the area, improve air quality and

biodiversity, and provide amenity . This would include replacement

habitat/provision being provided which is of equal or better standard

(in both quantitative and qualitative terms) than existing.


DM M270 Policy DM42

Final sentence of last paragraph:


Framework the Council will resist proposals that will involve the loss of

garden spaces to built development where it will result in harm to the kical

environment and amenity.

Amend final sentence of last paragraph:


Framework NPPF the Council will resist proposals that will involve

the loss of garden spaces to built development where it will result in

harm to the kical environment and amenity.

To reflect potential amendments to national policy MAIN No No

DM M272 Policy DM43

First Paragraph

The Council will support proposals where the primary objective is to

conserve or enhance biodiversity and/or geodiversity or where

development proposals provide better opportunities to secure

management for the long term biodiversity and geodiversity enhancement.

First Paragraph

The Council will support proposals where the primary objective is to

conserve or enhance biodiversity and/or geodiversity or where

development proposals provide better opportunities to secure

management for the long term biodiversity gains and geodiversity

enhancement.


DM M273 Policy DM43

Fifth Paragraph

Adverse effects should be avoided, or where this is not possible they

should be mitigated, to make sure that the integrity of internationally

important sites are protected. Development that may adversely affect the

integrity…

Fifth Paragraph

Adverse effects will not be permitted should be avoided, or where

this is not possible they should be mitigated, in order to make sure

that the integrity of internationally important sites are protected. In

exceptional circumstances Ddevelopment that may...'

To be consistent with national planning policy. MAIN No No

DM M274 Policy DM43

Seventh Paragraph

Development Proposals will not be permitted where it results in an adverse

effect on sites of national importance for biodiversity and/or geology.

Seventh paragraph

Development Proposals will not normally be permitted where it

results in an adverse effect on sites of national importance for

biodiversity and/or geology.


DM M278 Policy DM44 Absent TextInclude new sentence at the start of the Policy: 'The Council will seek

to protect and retain protected trees, hedgerows and woodland '.To provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M279 Policy DM44

Third paragraph 'Development should positively incorporate existing trees

and hedgerows within new development. Where this cannot be achieved

the onous is on the applicant to justify the loss of trees and hedgerows as

part of…'

Amend third paragraph 'Development should positively incorporate

existing trees and hedgerows within new development. The Council

will resist the loss of trees within development proposals, particularly

where it can be demonstrated that appropriate alternative design

solutions exist that can allow for retention and incorporation of such

features into the overall design of a new development . Where this

cannot be achieved the onous is on the applicant ...'


DM M280 Policy DM44

Alter wording of final paragraph:

'The Council will expect appropriate opportunities to encourage the

planting of new trees, hedgerows and woodland, making use of indigenous

species, throughout the district in an effort to mitigate against the impacts

of Climate Change, and to enhance the character and appearance of the

district'.

The Council will expect appropriate opportunities to encourage the

planting of new trees, hedgerows and woodland, making use of

indigenous species and local provenance , throughout the district in

an effort to mitigate against the impacts of Climate Change, and to

enhance the surrounding character and appearance of the district'.


DM M282 Policy DM45 Additional new paragraph to be added following 12.44


A landscape assessment will be required as part of the submission of

any proposal that may be considered to have a potential impact on

the setting of the AONB or the Yorkshire Dales National Park. In the

case of larger and otherwise more sensitive schemes a Landscape

and Visual Impact Assessment of a proportionate scale will be

required. In all cases, assessments should be proportionate to the

scale of the proposal and level of impact of the proposed

development on the landscape. In some cases this may be achieved

through the Design and Access Statement, for example where it is a

more minor application and/or has limited impacts. In addition to

guidance specifically referred to in the policy, proposals should have

regard to other available landscape character guidance and evidence

that may be of relevance.

To provide consistency with the wider Local Plan. MAIN No No

DM M285 Policy DM45

Current subheading

Development affecting Other Important Landscapes (outside of

designated landscapes)

Amend sub-title to read

Development outside of Protected and Designated LandscapesTo provide further clarity to the policy. MAIN No No

DM M286 Policy DM45

Second sentence of the 9th paragraph

The Council propose to prepare additional guidance for managing

recreational pressure on Morecambe Bay. Development proposals that

seek to introduce furtherrecreation pressure onto Morecambe Bay will be

required to have due regard to this guidance.

Delete second and third sentence of the 9th paragraph

The Council propose to prepare additional guidance for managing

recreational pressure on Morecambe Bay. Development proposals

that seek to introduce further recreation pressure onto Morecambe

Bay will be required to have due regard to this guidance.

Additional guidance is no longer being prepared MAIN No Yes

DM M287 Policy DM45

Tenth paragraph

A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be required where

the proposal is for a Schedule I EIA development, the proposal is for wind

turbines, pylons, telecommunication masts and solar farms; the proposal

involves significant landscape or visual impact by virtue of the senstivity

ofthe location within or adjacent to an AONB or National Park or the

proximity of the proposal to a heritage assset whereit islikely to effect the

assets setting'.

Amend Tenth Paragraph to read:

A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will be required

where the proposal is for a Schedule I EIA development, the proposal

is for wind turbines, pylons, telecommunication masts and solar

farms; the proposal involves significant landscape or visual impact

due to its scale or by virtue of the senstivity of the location within or

adjacent to an AONB or National Park or the proximity of the

proposal to a heritage assset whereit islikely to effect the assets

setting'.

To provide greater clarity within the plan. MAIN No No

DM M288 Policy DM45

Key Urban Landscapes are identified as those areas within the main urban

areas which are of value in their own wight in relation to their visual and

amenity value as well as their role in providing the setting for important

heritage assets. Urban Setting Landscapes are defined as thise areas that

whilst not necessarily important in their own right provide an important

role in the setting of the main urban areas of the district. Such areas are

usually located on the edge of the main urban area.

Key Urban Landscapes are identified as those areas within the main

urban areas which are integral to the built form of the district,

providing a setting for important features and/or heritage assets.

They play an important role in defining the townscape of the main

urban area and are inextricably linked to the experience of the wider

setting of these features. These areas also provide amenity value for

local residents and the wider community. The amenity value of these

areas is protected by other policies within the Local Plan. In

comparison Urban Setting Landscapes are peripheral to the built

form and located only on the edge of the main urban area. They are

identified because they provide a visual frame for the urban area,

providing an important role in the setting of existing development,

and providing a significant context or legibility to features within the

wider landscape. are identified as those areas within the main urban

areas which are of value in their own wight in relation to their visual

and amenity value as well as their role in providing the setting for

important heritage assets. Urban Setting Landscapes are defined as

thise areas that whilst not necessarily important in their own right

provide an important role in the setting of the main urban areas of

the district. Such areas are usually located on the edge of the main

urban area.

To be consistent with the evidence base. MAIN No No

DM M293 Policy DM49 Additional new paragraph to be added at the start of Policy DM49

Additional paragraph to read

Development proposals within the North Lancaster Green Belt will be

considered in accordance with national planning policy and

inappropriate development will be resisted.


CHAPTER 13: DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL AREAS

DM M295 Policy DM50 Additional text to be added to the end of the policy.

Further text to be added reads:

Proposals should have due regard to all other relevant policies within

the Local Plan and, in particular other policies within this DPD.


plan.MAIN No No

DM M297 Policy DM51

Fourth Paragraph

Proposals for caravan sites within the North Lancashire Green Belt will only

be permitted where it is concluded that it does not result in harm to the

Green Belt and does not have an adverse impact on its openess in

accordance with Policy DM49 of this document.

Fourth Paragraph

Proposals for caravan sites within the North Lancashire Green Belt

will only be permitted where it is concluded that it does not result in

harm to the Green Belt and does not have an adverse impact on its

openess in accordance with Policy DM49 of this document.


CHAPTER 14: ENERGY GENERATION

DM M299 Policy DM52Amendments to be made to the Mapping relating to areas suitable for

wind energy.

Map to be retitled Figure 14.1. Further wording to read:

Areas which are not covered by the constraints highlighted in Figure

14.1 are areas which are considered to be suitable for wind energy

development (subject to compliance with other planning policy

considerations)


CHAPTER 15: SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

DM M300 Policy DM55

Criterion I

Ensure that a robust and transparent marketing exercise has taken place

demonstrating that the retention of the existing use is no longer

economically viable or feasible. This should include a realistic advertising

period of at least 12 months at a realistic price (confirmed by independent

verification), making use of local and (if appropriate) national media

sources. Information on all offers made, together with copies of the sales

particulars will also be required to accompany the application;

Criterion I

Ensure that a robust and transparent marketing exercise has taken

place demonstrating that the retention of the existing use is no The

continuation of the existing use is demonstrated has been no longer

economically viable or feasible, having fully explored all options for

continuance, and thereafter it is demonstrated that there is no

reasonable prospect of securing a viable satisfactory alternative

community use. This should include a realistic advertising period of

at least 12 months at a realistic price (confirmed by independent

verification), making use of local and (if appropriate) national media

sources. Information on all offers made, together with copies of the

sales particulars will also be required to accompany the application;

To provide further clarity in the policy MAIN No No

DM M301 Policy DM55

Criteron III

The current/previous use no longer retains an economic and social value

for the community it serves.

Criteron III

The current/previous use no longer retains an economic and social

value for the community it serves.

To provide further clarity in the policy MAIN No No

DM M302 Policy DM55 Insert paragraph following paragraph 15.14

Demonstrating that the continuation of an exisitng use is no longer

viable will involve the submission of the following information by an

applicant to demonstrate that reasonable attempts have been made

to actively market the land or premises for sale or lease by an

appropriate agent(s), at existing use value for at least 12 consecutive

months prior to the application being made:

details of the company and person who has carried out the marketing

exercise;

copy of the sales particulars;

details of the original price paid, date of purchase and the new guide

price;

schedule of the advertising carried out, with copies of the

advertisements and details of where and when the advertisements

were placed, along with an estimate of the expenditure incurred from

advertising;

the confirmed number of sales particulars distributed, along with a

breakdown of where the enquiries resulted from, for example, from

the “For Sale/To Let” board, advertisements, etc.;

details of the number of viewings;

resulting offers and why they were dismissed;

details of the period when a “For Sale/To Let” board was displayed,

or if not, the reasons behind the decision; and

timetable of events from the initial appointment of the agents to

current date.


DM M303 Policy DM55 Insert paragraph prior to paragraph 15.17

In reference to the definition of an appropriate agent(s), this means

agent(s) specialising in premises with the same use as the application

site, where they exist, in addition to local property agents. Planning

applications involving the loss of land or premises currently or last in

community use will not be validated until the council is satisfied that

the information set out above is provided in support of the

application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to agree site

valuations and marketing arrangements with the Council in advance

of making an application.


DM M304 Policy DM56 Two new paragraphs to be added after paragraph 15.17

Within national planning policy, guidance is provided on how health

should be considered by the planning system. It is clear that as part of

delivering on the social dimension of sustainable development that

planning has a role in supporting and developing strong, vibrant and

healthy communities.

National planning policy is clear that through both plan-making and

decision-taking processes that there is a need to take account and

support the delivery of local strategies to improve health, social and

cultural well-being for all sections of the community. An aspiration

shared by both the original and revised NPPF.


CHAPTER 16: INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY

DM M311 Policy DM57

Assessing Viability

In principle the inability to secure the necessary contributions either

through conditions or agreements to make particular development

acceptable in planning terms (for instance environmental mitigation or

compensation) must indicate an unacceptable proposal that should not be

approved.

Assessing Viability

In principle the inability to secure the necessary contributions either

through conditions or agreements to make particular development

acceptable in planning terms (for instance environmental mitigation

or compensation) must indicate an unacceptable proposal that

should not be approved. Where the necessary contributions to make

particular development acceptable in planning terms cannot be

secured through either planning condition or obligation (for instance

environmental mitigation or compensation) then development will

not be supported.


DM M314 Policy DM58

Second Paragraph

For smaller schemes the Council will expect FTTP to be provided where

practical.

Second Paragraph

For smaller schemes the Council will encourage expect FTTP to be

provided where it is practical and viable to do so .


CHAPTER 17: TRANSPORT, ACCESSIBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY

DM M320 Policy DM59 New criterion to be added after Criterion II

Ensure the impacts of development do not adversely affect the safe

and efficient operation of the local and/or strategic highway

network.


DM M323 Policy DM59

Criterion IV

Develop an innovative approach to the delivery of public transport in the

rural areas of the district;

Criterion IV

Develop an innovative approach to the delivery of public transport in

the rural areas of the district;

It is considered that the requirement set out in this

criterion is not sufficiently effective given the limited role

that the local planning authority can play in the delivery

of public transport in rural locations.

MAIN No No

DM M324 Policy DM59

Criterion V

Include measures that address matters of highway safety to the

satisfaction of the local highway authority;

Criterion V

Ensure any adverse impacts, such as matters of highway safety, are

appropriately mitigated to the satisfaction Include measures that

address matters of highway safety to the satisfaction of the local

highway authority;


DM M325 Policy DM59

Criterion VII

Make appropriate provision for parking in accordance with Policy DM61

and the car parking standards set out in Appendix E of this document in

terms of both the number of spaces provided and their location in relaiton

to the development, to encourage sustainable travel patters and avoid

congestionand adverse highway safety impacts caused by excessive on-

street parking; and

Criterion VII

Make appropriate provision for parking in accordance with Policy

DM61 and the car parking standards set out in Appendix E of this

document in terms of both the number of spaces provided and their

location in relaiton to the development, to encourage sustainable

travel patters and avoid congestionand adverse highway safety

impacts caused by excessive on-street parking; and


DM M326 Policy DM59

Criterion VIII

Be designed and located to ensure the provision of safe streets and reduce

as far as possible the negative impacts of vehicles in accordance with

paragraph 32 of the National Planning Policy Framework. This should

address issues such as highway efficiency and excessive volumes of traffic,

fumes and noise and where possible road infrastructure should seek to

compliment and enhance the landscape and townscape.

Criterion VIII

Be designed and located to ensure the provision of safe streets and

reduce as far as possible the negative impacts of vehicles in

accordance with paragraph 32 of the National Planning Policy

Framework. This should address issues such as highway efficiency

and excessive volumes of traffic, fumes and noise and where possible

road infrastructure should seek to compliment and enhance the

landscape and townscape.

To provide greater clarity within the policy, these issues

are dealt with under existing criteria and new criterion

proposed through this modification process.

MAIN No No

DM M327 Policy DM59 New criterion to be added to the end of the policy.

Where proposals generate significant traffic movements, the impacts

of development should be mitigated by measures which are set out

within a Travel Plan.


DM M328 Policy DM59

Penultimate paragraph

Where proposals are not able to achieve this, it must be clearly

demonstrated that significant impacts can be addressed through the

preparation of a Travel Plan in accordance with Policy DM62.

Penultimate paragraph

Where proposals are not able to achieve this, it must be clearly

demonstrated that significant impacts can be addressed through the

preparation of a Travel Plan in accordance with Policy DM62.

This matter is now dealt with elsewhere in the policy

through newly suggested modificationsMAIN No No

DM M329 Policy DM59

Final paragraph

Development proposals should seek t maximise the effeciency and capacity

on the existing transport and highway network. Where such capacity is

insufficient to accommodate the proposal, the provision of new transport

and highway infrasturcture will be sought as a priority. Depending on the

scale, nature and locaiton of new development new infrastructure either in

whole or in part, will be required to enable to the properly phased

implementation of the development. Where capacity is insufficient, and

inadequate mitigation measures are proposed to remediate this issue, then

planning permission is likely to be refused.

Final paragraph

Development proposals should seek t maximise the effeciency and

capacity on the existing transport and highway network. Where such

capacity is insufficient to accommodate the proposal, the provision

of new transport and highway infrasturcture will be sought as a

priority. Depending on the scale, nature and locaiton of new

development new infrastructure either in whole or in part, will be

required to enable to the properly phased implementation of the

development. Where capacity is insufficient, and inadequate

mitigation measures are proposed to remediate this issue, then

planning permission is likely to be refused.

This matter is now dealt with elsewhere in the policy

through newly suggested modificationsMAIN No No

DM M330 Policy DM59 The creation of a new final paragraph to Policy DM59.

Where proposals are unable to address the matters described above

and that the impacts of the scheme, either individually or

cumulatively cannot be resolved through mitigation, then planning

permission will be refused.


DM M331 Policy DM60

I. Maintain and where possible improve the existing pedestrian

infrastructure, including the Public Rights of Way (PROW) and green

infrastructure network;

I. Maintain and where possible improve the existing pedestrian

infrastructure, including the Public Rights of Way (PROW) and green

infrastructure canal network;


DM M332 Policy DM60 The creation of a new paragraph to Policy DM60.IV. Designed to provide legible places that encourages high levels of

accessibility

To ensure proposals provide useable walking and cycling

environmentsMAIN No No

DM M333 Policy DM60

Where development proposals affect a Public Right of Way, the Council will

expect that routes will be retained along existing alignments. Appropriate

alternative diversion routes will be considered where it is not feasible or

appropriate to retain the existing route, to the satisfaction of Lancashire

County Council.

Where development proposals affect a Public Right of Way, the

Council will expect that routes will be retained along existing

alignments. Appropriate alternative diversion routes will be

considered where it is not feasible or appropriate to retain the

existing route, to the satisfaction of Lancashire County Council.


policy is not sufficiently effective given the limited role

that the local planning authority can play in Public Rights

of Way legislation.

MAIN No No

DM M334 Policy DM60

Development that will generate a significant level of footfall should be

located within central or highly accessible locations, which provide good

access for pedestrians and have due consideration to the criteria set out in

(I) to (III) above and any other relevant guidance provided on this matter.

Development that will generate a significant level of footfall should

be located within central or highly accessible locations, which

provide good access for pedestrians and have due consideration to

the criteria set out in (I) to (III) above and any other relevant

guidance provided on this matter.


DM M335 Policy DM60

To build on the previous success of Lancaster’s designation as a ‘Cycling

Demonstration Town’ the Council will ensure that development proposals

do not adversely impact on the existing cycling network or cycle users.

Development proposals should also encourage greater opportunities for

cycle users through good design, and deliver appropriate cycle access.

Proposals should also include appropriate linkages to the existing cycle

network and secure and covered cycle parking and storage facilities.

To build on the previous success of Lancaster’s designation as a

‘Cycling Demonstration Town’ the Council will ensure that

development proposals do not adversely impact on the existing

cycling network or cycle users. Development proposals should also

encourage greater opportunities for cycle users through good design,

and deliver appropriate cycle access. Proposals should also include

appropriate linkages to the existing cycle network and secure and

covered cycle parking and storage facilities. The level of cycling and

walking infrastructure to be provided will be related to the need for

modal shift and is likely to be greatest in urban areas.

To provide greater clarity and to recognise that

approaches in rural areas may require different solutions

in terms of sustainable travel.

MAIN No No

DM M336 Policy DM60

Cycling improvements should be implemented across all communities on

the social gradient, but with a particular focus on those lower down the

gradient. Non-residential development proposals should also promote

shower changing facilities for staff.

Cycling improvements should be implemented across all

communities on the social gradient, but with a particular focus on

those lower down the gradient. Non-residential development

proposals should also promote shower changing facilities for staff.

It is considered that all parts of the community should

be considered. MAIN No No

DM M337 Policy DM60

The Council will seek to protect the established Public Rights of Way

(PROW) within the district; this includes footpaths of local importance but

also footpaths of national importance, including the English Coastal Path

Route. Development proposals that affect recognised Public Rights of Way

should, in the first instance, seek to incorporate existing routes

satisfactorily within the proposal. Where this is demonstrated to not be

possible the Council will expect proposals to provide adequate alternative

arrangements through the appropriate diversion of existing routes.

The Council will seek to protect the established Public Rights of Way

(PROW) within the district; this includes footpaths of local

importance but also footpaths of national importance, including the

English Coastal Path Route. Development proposals that affect

recognised Public Rights of Way should, in the first instance, seek to

incorporate existing routes satisfactorily within the proposal. Where

this is demonstrated to not be possible the Council will expect

proposals to provide adequate alternative arrangements through the

appropriate diversion of existing routes.


policy is not sufficiently effective given the limited role

that the local planning authority can play in Public Rights

of Way legislation.

MAIN No No

DM M338 Policy DM60

To build on the previous success of Lancaster’s designation as a ‘Cycling

Demonstration Town’ the Council will ensure that development proposals

do not adversely impact on the existing cycling network or cycle users.

Development proposals should also encourage greater opportunities for

cycle users through good design, and deliver appropriate cycle access.

Proposals should also include appropriate linkages to the existing cycle

network and secure and covered cycle parking and storage facilities. The

level of cycling and walking infrastructure to be provided will be related to

the need for modal shift and is likely to be greatest in urban areas.

To build on the previous success of Lancaster’s designation as a

‘Cycling Demonstration Town’ the Council will ensure that

development proposals do not adversely impact on the existing

cycling network or cycle users. Development proposals should also

encourage greater opportunities for cycle users through good design,

and deliver appropriate cycle access. Proposals should also include

appropriate linkages to the existing cycle network and provide secure

and covered cycle parking and storage facilities. Where necessary

development should contribute to the development of the existing

network as set out in Policy T2 of the Strategic Policies and Land

Allocations DPD. The level of cycling and walking infrastructure to be

provided will be related to the need for modal shift and is likely to be

greatest in urban areas.

To provide greater clarity on the need for wider

improvements to the network.MAIN No No

DM M339 Policy DM60










DM M340 Policy DM60










DM M341 Policy DM61 New criterion to be added to Policy DM61

The design and layout of car parking within new development should

be carefully considered to avoid large unbroken areas of hard

standing.


DM M342 Policy DM61

Where garage provision is to be provided, these should be of a sufficient

size to genuinely be used by a car and should include an internal space of

at least 6 metres long by 3 metres wide.

Where garage provision is to be provided, these should be of a

sufficient size to genuinely be used by a car and should include an

internal space of at least 6 metres long by 3 metres wide.


DM M343 Policy DM61New paragraph to be added to the Car Parking Provision section of Policy

DM61.

For proposals that will generate visitor trips (this can be either

residential or commercial uses), it should be demonstrated that an

appropriate number of visitor spaces are provided over and above the

standards set out in Appendix E.


DM M344 Policy DM61

Final Paragraph

Adequate and secure vehicle and cycle parking facilities should be provided

to serve the needs of the proposed development. Car free development, or

development proposed which incorporates very limited car parking

provision, will only be considered acceptable in appropriate locations

where there is clear justification for the level of provision proposed.

Final Paragraph

Adequate and secure vehicle and cycle parking facilities should be

provided to serve the needs of the proposed development. Car free

development, or development proposed which does not meet the

requirements of Appendix E incorporates very limited car parking

provision, will only be considered acceptable in appropriate locations

where there is clear justification for the level of provision proposed.


DM M345 Policy DM61

For proposals that will generate visitor trips (this can be either residential

or commercial uses), it should be demonstrated that an appropriate

number of visitor spaces are provided over and above the standards set

out in Appendix E.

For proposals that will generate visitor trips (this can be either

residential or commercial uses), it should be demonstrated that an

appropriate number of visitor spaces are provided over and above

the standards set out in Appendix E.

This paragraph has been moved into the main body of

Policy DM61.MAIN No No

DM M348 Policy DM62 Delete the first paragraph of Policy DM62

First Paragraph

The Council will support proposals that maximise opportuntiies for

the use of sustainable modes of travel. Development proposals

should make appropriate contributions (having due regard to cost-

effectiveness) to improve the transport network and transport

infrastructure, particularly to facilitate walking, cycling and public

transport (bus and rail) to encourage the use of alternative forms of

transport from the private car.

To reduce repetition within the DPD MAIN No No

DM M349 Policy DM62

Second Paragraph

Proposals that would generate a high number of trips or visits, or generate

significant traffic movements on the local highway network should be

located in a sustainable location which can be accessed through a variety of

transport modes. Proposals should not give rise to traffic volumes that

exceed the capacity of the local road network without mitigation measures

being agreed, nor cause harm to the character of the surrounding area.

Second Paragraph

Proposals that would generate a high number of trips or visits, or

generate significant traffic movements on the local highway network

should be located in a sustainable location which can be accessed

through a variety of transport modes should be accompanied by a

relevant Transport Assessment or Travel Plan . Proposals should not

give rise to traffic volumes that exceed the capacity of the local road

network without mitigation measures being agreed, nor cause harm

to the character of the surrounding area.


DM M350 Policy DM62

Fourth Paragraph

The 'Travel Plan' will also be required where the development involves

significant residential, commercial or employment development or non-

residential institutions including schools, colleges and universities.

Fourth Paragraph

The 'Travel Plan' will also be required where the development

involves significant residential, commercial or employment

development or non-residential institutions including schools,

colleges, and universities and hospitals .


DM M351 Policy DM62 Additional paragraph to be added.

For major development, applicants will be required to demonstrate

that the transport assessment has informed the design of the

proposed development and the accompanying Travel Plan. Effective

transport management should be identified, including appropriate

mitigation of the impacts. The mitigation identified may need to be

addressed through a range of measures, including planning

obligations, s278 works and/or a Travel Plan.


DM M353 Policy DM62

For major development, applicants will be required to demonstrate that

the transport assessment has informed the design of the proposed

development and the accompanying Travel Plan. Effective transport

management should be identified, including appropriate mitigation of the

impacts. The mitigation identified may need to be addressed through a

range of measures, including planning obligations, s278 works and/or a

travel plan.

For major development, applicants will be required to demonstrate

that the transport assessment has informed the design of the

proposed development and the accompanying Travel Plan. Effective

transport management should be identified, including appropriate

mitigation of the impacts. The mitigation identified may need to be

addressed through a range of measures, including planning

obligations, s278 works and/or a travel plan.

This paragraph has been moved into the main body of

Policy DM62.MAIN No No

DM M360 Policy DM63

Improvement to highway capacity on the A6 Corridor in South Lancaster

Improvement to traffic management in Lancaster City Centre

Improvements to connectivity around Morecambe Bay

Enhancing the role of Ultra Low Emission Vehicles

Investigating the role of a New Bus Rapid Transit System between South

Lancaster - Lancaster City Centre - Morecambe - Heysham

Improvement to highway capacity on the A6 Corridor between

Lancaster City Centre and Galgate in South Lancaster

Improvement to traffic management in Lancaster City Centre to

provide greater priority to public transport, pedestrian and cycling

movements

Improvements to connectivity around Morecambe Bay improving rail

services and improving cycling and walking linkages

Enhancing the role of Ultra Low Emission Vehicles

Investigating the role of Establishing a Nn ew Bus Rapid Transit

System between South Lancaster - Lancaster City Centre - Junction

34 Park and Ride - Morecambe - Heysham


DM M361 Policy DM63Creation of two new paragraphs which is positioned below the bullet

points in Policy DM63.

Proposals which seek, by their scale, location and nature, to

compromise the delivery of strategic highway and transport

improvements in the district, as outlined in the Highways and

Transport Masterplan will not be supported.

Where appropriate the Council may seek contributions towards the

delivery of new infrastructure to acheive the aims and objectives set

out in the Highways and Transport Masterplan where such

contributions are reasonable and directly related to the development

proposed in line with national planning policy.


CHAPTER 18: PLANNING ENFORCEMENT

APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF TERMS

DM M367 N/A Additional term to be added to the Glossary

Landscape Capacity

An approach to planning in the AONBs that allocates and permits

development only where it will not harm the primary purpose of

designation, which is to conserve and enhance the natural beauty,

wildlife and cultural heritage of the area. This requires an objective

assessment of the landscape and visual impact resulting from

potential development.

To provide further clarity to the DPD. MAIN No No

APPENDIX B: BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

APPENDIX C: POLICY NUMBER CHANGESAPPENDIX D: OPEN SPACE STANDARDSAPPENDIX E: CAR PARKING STANDARDS

DM M372 N/AAdditional standards to be included for Student Accommodation under

Class C2

Additional Standards to read:

City Centre Locations - 1 per resident staff and 1 per 10 beds

District and Local Centres - 1 per resident staff and 1 per 5 beds

All other areas - 1 per resident staff and 1 per 5 beds

Disabled parking up to 200 bays - 3 bays or 6% of total

Disabled parking more than 200 bays - 2 bays or 4% of total

Bicycles - 1 per 3 beds

Motorbikes - 1 per 100 beds (min. 2)

To provide further clarity to the document. MAIN No No

APPENDIX F: AGRILCULTURAL AND WORKERS DWELLINGS

APPENDIX G: PURPOSE BUILT STUDENT ACCOMMODATION

APPENDIX H: FLAT CONVERSIONS

SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS TO THE LOCAL PLAN POLICIES MAPS - PRE EXAMINATION (SEPTEMBER 2018)SUGGESTED LIST OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE LOCAL PLAN POLICIES MAPS - CONSULTATION OCTOBER 2018

MODIFICATION

NUMBER

POLICY

NUMBERAREA TEXT IN PUBLICATION VERSION PROPOSED AMENDMENT REASON FOR AMENDMENT

MAJOR / MINOR

MODIFICATION


TO THE SA


TO THE HRA

INSET MAP 1: MAIN URBAN AREAS

LPPM M04Mineral

SafeguardingN/A Not applicable Mineral safeguarding areas should be clearly identifiable on the Local Plan Policies Maps

To provide clarity and consistency in the Local Plan Policies Map to

the Strategic Policies & Land Allocations DPD.MAIN No No

LPPM M05

Urban

Settlement

Boundary

Land to the East of Fulwood Drive /

Russell Drive

The urban settlement boundary on land to the rear of Fulwood Drive and Russell Drive

currently makes use of the West Coast Mainline.

The Urban Settlement boundary should be amended to reflect the current urban

boundary in this area.



LPPM M10 Policy SG7 East Lancaster Strategic Site Not applicable

The extent of the SG7 allocation should be extended to include the land at (and surround)

Cuckoo Farm. The landscape designation should also be scaled back towards the

motorway to provide a narrow buffer to reflect landscaping evidence for this area.



LPPM M11 Policy SG9 North Lancaster Strategic Site Not applicableThe allocation for housing (denoted in orange) should be extended northwards to the

boundary of the local landscape designation.



LPPM M12 Policy SG9 North Lancaster Strategic Site Not applicableTo remove the key urban landscape designation from the wider housing allocation

(denoted in orange). The wider boundary should be retained.



LPPM M13 Policy SG14 Port of Heysham Policy SG14 covers land at the Port of HeyshamThe boundaries of Policy SG14's allocation at the Port should be amended and realigned

to exclude the land on the foreshort known as the 'Heysham Helipad'.

To take account of the findings of the HRA and address concerns of

Natural England over impacts on the adjacent Morecambe Bay.MAIN No No

LPPM M34 Policy H2.7Land at Monkswell Avenue, Bolton-le

SandsNot applicable Delete Allocation and renumber / relabel all rural housing sites which follow

To reflect evidence and information from the landowner that the

site is not deliverable for residential purposes.MAIN No No

LPPM M44 Policy EN6Green Belt - Land to the West of Sea

View Drive, Slyne-with-HestThe land is currently located in the North Lancashire Green Belt.

To re-align the Green Belt boundaries in this location, moving the Green Belt boundary

westwards to make use of the Lancaster Canal to the west and to the South Rakes Head

Lane.

To provide alignment with the emerging Slyne-with-Hest

Neighbourhood Plan and provide future opportunities for growth to

meet local needs.

MAIN No No

LPPM M54 Policy SC3 Public Open Space Not applicableTo be updated in light of evidence which has arisen from the Lancaster District Open

Space Study, completed in September 2018.



INSET MAP 2: LANCASTER TOWN CENTRE

LPPM M63 Policy DOS2 Moor Lane Mills, Central Lancaster Not applicableDelete allocation DOS2, this areas should be now included in the wider SG5 allocation for

the Canal Quarter.



LPPM M64 Policy DOS3 Luneside East Not applicableDelete allocation DOS3, this site should now be identified under Policy H1 of the Strategic

Policies & Land Allocations DPD



INSET MAP 3: CARNFORTH

LPPM M66

Urban

Settlement

Boundary

N/A Not applicable

The urban settlement boundary to the south of Carnforth (in the vicinity of the SG12

allocation) should be realigned to between reflect the expected extent of build

development on the site.



LPPM M67 Policy SG11 Lundsfield QuarryThe land at Carnforth Rangers FC is currently omitted from the wider allocation of

Lundsfield Quarry (SG11)

Land at Carnforth Rangers to be included within the wider SG11 allocation (and coloured

orange).



LPPM M69 Policy EC1 Land at Scoland Road Land at Scotland Road is allocated for employment purposes under Policy EC1.3The employment allocation in this area should be expanded northwards to meet the

railway line.



INSET MAP 4: MORECAMBE TOWN CENTRE

INSET MAP 5: JUNCTION 33

DISTRICT-WIDE MAP

LPPM M94 Policy H2 Old Hall Farm, Over Kellet Not applicableNew allocation to be identified for housing at Old Hall Farm, Over Kellet to reflect recent

planning approval.



Documents

SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS TO THE STRATEGIC POLICIES & … · Completions - 595 2,070 Pre-Adoption. Plan Period Year 2017/18 - 2018/19. Delivery Expectation - 392 941 First five years