Successes and Failures of Labor Market Policy in Europe - J. Kluve

8/11/2019 Successes and Failures of Labor Market Policy in Europe - J. Kluve

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/successes-and-failures-of-labor-market-policy-in-europe-j-kluve 1/23

R h e i n i s c h - W

e s t f ä l i s c h e s I n s t i t u t f ü r W i r t s c h a f t s f o r s c h u n g

1J Kluve

Successes and Failures of

Labor Market Policy in Europe

Jochen Kluve(RWI Essen, Germany)

Colombia Employment and Development Conference

Bogotá, November 14, 2008





2J Kluve

Introduction

Majority of countries worldwide has implemented certain labor

market policies: unemployment benefits, training for theunemployed, etc

While labor markets are heterogeneous by country, these policies

are similar, and their general objective is the same: increase

employment, reduce unemployment

Important for countries to learn from each other’s experience

Europe: many different countries within relatively small space,

many experiences with different labor policies





3J Kluve

Today„s presentation

European labor markets: Unemployment and policy spending

Passive and Active Labor Market Policy

Knowledge on ALMP effectiveness

Types of countries

Systematizing the evidence: Meta-analysis

Failures and successes





4J Kluve





5J Kluve

Unemployment in Europe

Source: Eurostat

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

E U ( 2 5 )

E U ( 1 5 )

A u s t

r i a

B e l g i u

m

C z e c

h R e p u

b l i c

D e n m

a r k

F i n l

a n d

F r a n

c e

G e r

m a n

y

H u n g a r y

I r e l a

n d I t a l y

N e t h e

r l a n d

s

P o l a

n d

P o r t u

g a l S p

a i n

S w e d

e n

U n i t e

d K i n g d o

m J a

p a n

N o r w

a y

U n i t e

d S t a

t e s

i n % 2006

2007





6J Kluve

Youth unemployment in Europe

Source: Eurostat

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

E U ( 2 5 )

E U ( 1 5 )

A u s t r i a

B e l g i u m

C z e c

h R e p u

b l i c

D e n m

a r k

F i n l

a n d

F r a n

c e

G e r

m a n y

H u n g a r y

I r e l a n d I t a l y

N e t h e

r l a n d s

P o l a n d

P o r t u

g a l S p

a i n

S w e d

e n

U n i t e

d K i n g d o

m J a

p a n

N o r w

a y

U n i t e

d S t a

t e s

i n %

2006

2007





7J Kluve

Long-term unemployment in Europe

Source: Eurostat

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

E U ( 2 5 )

E U ( 1 5 )

A u s t r i a

B e l g i u m

C z e c

h R e p u

b l i c

D e n m

a r k F i

n l a n d

F r a n

c e

G e r

m a n y

H u n g a r y

I r e l a n d I t a l y

N e t h e

r l a n d s P o

l a n d

P o r t u

g a l S p

a i n

S w e d

e n

U n i t e

d K i n g d o m

J a p a n

N o r w a y

U n i t e

d S t a

t e s

i n % 2005

2006





8J Kluve

European labor markets: overview

Unemployment in 2005:

EU-15: 8.0% 14 Mio., of which 4.7 Mio. LTU

EU-27: 8.9% 19.3 Mio., of which 7.9 Mio. LTU

Spending (2003):

EU-15: 65 Bio. Euros on active labor market policy = .75% of GDP

25 Bio. Euros on training programs

126 Bio. Euros on passive labor market policy

(Eurostat)





9J Kluve

“Passive” labor market policy

“Out-of-work income maintenance and support”, i.e.unemployment benefits and unemployment assistance

Early retirement schemes

Administration of the Public Employment Services (PES)

”Administering unemployment”







11J Kluve

EU spending by program type

0

0,05

0,1

0,15

0,2

0,25

0,3

Total LMP

services

Training Job rotation

and job

sharing

Employment

incentives

Integration of

the disabled

Direct job

creation

Start-up

incentives

Source: Eurostat





12J Kluve

Knowledge on ALMP effectiveness

For a particular country:

Labor market policy

Types of Active Labor Market Programs

Design of the unemployment insurance system (passive support)

Interaction of the active and passive systems (sanctions, “rights

and duties”)

Evaluation practice

Data collection

Academic and government-sponsored research

Policy interest in learning about program effectiveness

[Countries are heterogeneous systematize information]





13J Kluve

Northern

urope

Western

urope

Southern urope

astern

urope




e s t f ä l i s c h e s I n s t i t u t f ü r

W i r t s c h a f t s f o r s c h u n g

14J Kluve

“Northern Europe”

Labor market policy Comprehensive use of Active Labor

Market Programs (Sweden: since the 1970s)

Generous unemployment insurance

system (Denmark: 90% replacement rate)

Program participation ultimatelycompulsory for the LTU

Evaluation practice

Comprehensive data collection (administrative)

Multitude of academic evaluation studies Changes in policy? To some extent






15J Kluve

“Western Europe”

Labor market policy Less comprehensive use of

Active Labor Market Programs,

but still substantial spending

Fairly generous unemployment insurance system

Many countries (e.g. Germany, Netherlands, UK) have introducedsanction elements over the last decade

Evaluation practice

Less established, mostly triggered by EU, in some countries

rapidly evolving (Germany) Increasing number of academic evaluation studies

Changes in policy? Unclear






16J Kluve

“Southern Europe”

Labor market policy Little use of Active Labor Market Programs, often regionally

focused

Less generous unemployment insurance system

Evaluation practice Program evaluation rather uncommon

Some academic evaluation studies exist

Little is known on ALMP effectiveness






17J Kluve

“Eastern Europe”

Labor market policy After breakdown of Communist regimes, systems of active and

passive support built from scratch, often copying Western systems

Little use of Active Labor Market Programs in most countries, some

exceptions are Romania and Poland (in the 1990s)

Unemployment insurancesystem offers basic support

Evaluation practice

Program evaluation rather uncommon Some academic evaluation studies exist

Little is known on ALMP effectiveness






18J Kluve

Spending on ALMP in Europe (%GDP)

00,2

0,40,6

0,81

1,21,4

1,61,8

2

S w e d

e n

D e n m

a r k

G e r m

a n y

N e t h e

r l a n d s

S p a i n I t a

l y

C z e c

h R e p u

b l i c

H u n g a r

y

2004

2005






19J Kluve

How to systematize the evidence

Meta-Analysis: Collect evaluations of Active Labor Market

Programs from all over Europe (following certain requirements) 137 studies

For each study: Does the evaluation find a positive, negative, or

zero effect of the program (on employment)?

[75 +, 33 Ø, 29 –]

Then analyze if there is a systematic pattern by program type:

1. Training (70)

2. Private sector incentive programs (23)

3. Public sector job creation (26)

4. Services and Sanctions (21)

5. Youth programs (35)






20J Kluve

Other factors that may influence effectiveness

For each country:

Labor market institutions

Gross replacement rate

Regulation on dismissal protection

Regulation on fixed-term contracts

Regulation on temporary work (OECD indexes)

Economic context

Unemployment rate

ALMP expenditure as % of GDP

GDP growth

Study design (method, sample size)






21J Kluve

Results: ALMP effectiveness in Europe

Picture emerging from analysis surprisingly clear-cut:

Little systematic relation between program effectiveness and

contextual factors

Exception: restrictive dismissal regulations

Instead: the program type matters






22J Kluve

Failures?

Direct job creation in the public sector very rarely has a positive

effect on participants’ employment probability. Quite the opposite:effects are frequently negative.

Training programs have mixed effects, but generally tend

towards positive impacts (see “successes” next slide), though

maybe not as clearly / strongly as one might have hoped for.

Young people seem to be particularly hard to assist. Indeed,

most youth programs fail. Perhaps ALMP is not the right type of

policy for this group Preventive measures.






23J Kluve

Successes?

Training programs are modestly effective on average. There is

some indication that impacts materialize in the longer run(human capital accumulation).

Private sector incentive schemes such as wage subsidies and

start-up grants generally show positive effects.

Caveat: Not much is known about substitution or displacement

effects and deadweight loss.

“Services and Sanctions” seem particularly successful:

Apparently many unemployed can be helped with basic job

search assistance measures. Also, sanction elements mobilize

the unemployed. These measures are also likely cost-effective.

Documents

Successes and Failures of Labor Market Policy in Europe - J. Kluve