14
Internal Arcs: Maximum Safety and Continuity of Supply in MV Substations Marcel Buckner Business Development Manager Africa EATON Electric

Striving for Maximum Safety

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Striving for Maximum Safety

Internal Arcs: Maximum Safety

and Continuity of Supply in

MV Substations

Marcel Buckner

Business Development Manager Africa

EATON Electric

Page 2: Striving for Maximum Safety

INTERNAL ARCS (1)

• Quality of supply and Personnel Safety most important

aspects of a Utility

• Prevention of internal arcs should be first and most important

approach in design and service stages

• Protection approach is to reduce effects of internal arcs

– Reducing arc duration

– Protective gear for operators

– Leading hot gasses away from persons to dedicated location around

the gear

• IEC 62271 considers pressure rise in substation with optional

IAC-B test

Page 3: Striving for Maximum Safety

INTERNAL ARCS (2)

• In short circuits high current flows through air inside assembly

– a high current fault arc occurs

• Current flows between phases or between one (or more)

phases, neutral and/or ground

• Amount of energy released varies, up to many MJs

• Consequences can be devastating

• Internal explosion can reach temperatures of beyond

19,000oC

• Release of toxic gasses – threat to environment and humans

• Resultant downtime unacceptable

Page 4: Striving for Maximum Safety

TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF INTERNAL ARC OCCURRENCES• Starts with dielectric breakdown of insulation medium

• Arc current then dependent on actual situation

• Internal arc causes overpressure / release of fire , gas

and smoke

– With gaseous insulation only

– With solid insulation per phase

• Phase-to-phase breakdown likely• Arc develops within 10 milliseconds

into 3-phase fault• High energy release• Arc difficult to control

• Phase-to-earth fault• Arcing current dependent on neutral treatment of network• Lead to multi-phase fault

Page 5: Striving for Maximum Safety

PREVENTION OF INTERNAL

ARCS CRUCIAL

• Prevention more important than cure

– Solid insulation

– Electrical field control

technologies

• Personnel safety paramount

• Personnel are vulnerable during general operations and

maintenance when internal arc occurs and they stand in front

of switchgear

• Single phase insulation

• Safe/high operational reliability• Throughout lifetime of

MV switchgear

Page 6: Striving for Maximum Safety

PREVENTING INTERNAL

ARCS BY DESIGN

• Prevention of internal arcs is crucial

• Metal- or insulation enclosed MV switchgear – achieves

stable power network and prevents internal arcs

• Compliance with IEC regulations / type tested /

endurance and aging tests

• Single pole solid insulation

Page 7: Striving for Maximum Safety

LIMITING ARC DURATION

• Overcurrent protection

• Arc detection systems react on light or pressure

• Duration of arc can be limited – maximum 1 second

• Arc eliminators can short circuit internal arc very quickly

– milliseconds

• Arc detection systems minimizes energy during arc as

well as impact – BUT does not prevent an internal arc

Page 8: Striving for Maximum Safety

ARC ABSORBERS

• Alleviate peak pressure rise on walls and ceilings,

excessive temperature and gas release

• Smart layout of chimneys – with integrated arc absorbers

– made up of ceramic honeycomb blocks drastically

decrease over-pressure in room

• If no external pressure relief option is viable or foreseen,

arc absorber included in design

• Cost savings

• Reduced amount of exhaust and temperature of gasses

• Extra safety for personnel

Page 9: Striving for Maximum Safety

ARC RESISTANT SWITCHGEAR

• Robust systems can predict pressure rise and burning

behavior – based on current, geometry, metal used

• Mechanisms determine the ‘arc burning place’

– At the moment of arcing

– Triggered by arc pressure itself

– Via hinge construction

• Arc stays at fixed spot

• Low arcing energy

• Reduced effect of arcing

Page 10: Striving for Maximum Safety

BEST OF BOTH WORLDS

• Single pole insulation

Arc resistant enclosure

• Air insulated Ring Main Unit (RMU)

single phase solid insulation in compact design

• Integrated arc absorbers

• Maximum safety• Protection from internal arcs

Figure: Compact, air insulated RMU, with

single phase solid insulation plus arc proof

metal enclosure.

Page 11: Striving for Maximum Safety

INSULATION MEDIUMS FOR

MV SWITCHGEAR• Solid insulation

– Polycarbonate and Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE)

– Cast resin technology (epoxy resin)

– Single Pole Design

• Vacuum technology – SF6 FREE

– Enclosed in metal-clad structure

– Sealed-for-life system

– Less moving parts / Maintenance free

– No additional end-of-life costs for disposal

– No threat to human life and environment on decommissioning

Page 12: Striving for Maximum Safety

CONCLUSIONS (1)

• Human safety most critical aspect

• Stable and safe energy supply crucial for economy

• Prevention is better than a cure or control

• Double prevention philosophy

– Prevent internal arc and

– Provide maximum safety for operator and

– Minimize damage to switchgear and containing room

Page 13: Striving for Maximum Safety

CONCLUSIONS (2)

• Specific internal arcs tests have been performed even beyond IEC standards

• Personnel safety one of the most challenging design

elements

• Users deserve equipment that have been rigorously

tested and carries IEC 62271 documentation

• The ideal state of “zero risk” can be achieved by

specifying the correct equipment