19
Steve Edburg Assistant Research Professor Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Washington State University [email protected]

Steve Edburg

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Steve Edburg. Assistant Research Professor Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Washington State University [email protected]. My Background. Large-eddy simulation (LES) PhD work at WSU Earth system modeling ( EaSM ) Postdoctoral work at UI. SUN. OUTFLOW. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Steve Edburg

Steve Edburg

Assistant Research ProfessorLaboratory for Atmospheric Research

Washington State University

[email protected]

Page 2: Steve Edburg

My Background

• Large-eddy simulation (LES)– PhD work at WSU

• Earth system modeling (EaSM)– Postdoctoral work at UI

Page 3: Steve Edburg

SOIL

SUN

Gas emission from biological processes in forest and soil

FOREST

air + trace gases

INFLOW

Mixing & ChemicalReactions

Products and reactants from biosphere atmosphere

interaction

OUTFLOW

Page 4: Steve Edburg

LES Overview• Gap in knowledge: The role of turbulence on chemical

production or loss within a forest canopy is unknown

• Objective: Our objective was to determine if reaction rates are modified by intermittent turbulent structures

• Hypothesis: Our central hypothesis was that turbulent structures alter reactions rates by un-evenly mixing trace gases above the canopy with gases emitted from trees

• Goal: Use large-eddy simulation to determine the influence of coherent structures on trace gas reaction rates

Page 5: Steve Edburg

Side View Animation

Page 6: Steve Edburg

Top View Animation

Page 7: Steve Edburg

Scalar Segregation

Page 8: Steve Edburg

Earth System Modeling

Page 9: Steve Edburg

EaSM Overview

• Knowledge gap: Impact of bark beetle outbreak on carbon cycling is unknown

• Objective: Quantify the impact of bark beetles on carbon cycling across the western US

• Aims: – Create a regional insect disturbance product;– modify a Earth system model;– conduct simulations with and without outbreaks

Page 10: Steve Edburg

USDA Forest Service, 2004

In 2009,• 4.3 Mha/10.6 Macres affected by bark beetles• 3.6 Mha/8.8 Macres affected by mountain pine beetle

Why is this issue important?1. Infestations are widespread throughout western US

10

Page 11: Steve Edburg

11

Photo by C. Schnepf, forestryimages.org

Dead tree, needles on Needles off Snag fall/understory growth

Physical and biogeochemical characteristics compared with undamaged forest

1. Reduced GPP2. Reduced ET

1. Reduced LAI2. Reduced

Interception

1. Increased Rh

2. Initial recovery

Year following attack After 3-5 years After several decades

Photo by Arjan Meddens Photo by Arjan Meddens

Page 12: Steve Edburg

Simulated Soil N Dynamics Play a Key Role in C Fluxes and Recovery

5 yr

10 yr 25 yr

Point simulation in Idaho: 95% mortality over 3 years

Page 13: Steve Edburg
Page 14: Steve Edburg

Future Research

Page 15: Steve Edburg

“Daily Forecasts of Wildland Fire Impacts on Air Quality in the Pacific Northwest: Enhancing the AIRPACT Decision Support System ”

Team: S. Edburg, B. Lamb, J. Vaughan, A. Kochanski, M.A. Jenkins, J. Mandel, N. Larkin, T. Strand, and R. Mell

Pending, submitted in December 2011 to NASA ROSES: Wildland

Fires

Page 16: Steve Edburg

Project Overview• Our long-term goal is to continue the development of AIRPACT

and evaluation tools to support decision making activities

• The objective of this proposal is to improve the representation of wildland fires within AIRPACT

• Our specific aim is to implement the WRF-Fire model within AIRPACT and evaluate simulations with satellite products

• We expect this will improve the plume rise and emission estimates and our evaluation techniques

• In our opinion, this will improve daily predictions of wildland fire impacts on air quality across the pacific northwest

Page 17: Steve Edburg

EOS inputs:

MOPITT (CO)

MODIS / GOES

CMAQ-Influence of fire on the Air Quality forecast (e.g. PM2.5, O3, NO2, CO, NMHC)

SMARTFIRE-Fire location-Fire area

BlueSky Modeling Framework-Speciated emissions-Time rate of emissions-Plume injection height of emissions

S.M.O.K.E -Emissions preprocessor

WRF-Fire

-Time rate of emissions-Plume Injection Heights

-Influence of meteorology on fire spread and intensity

Proposed Additions

EOS Evaluation

-OMI NO2 & O3

-MISR/CALPISO aerosol

AIRPACT

WRF-Meteorological Input-72 hour forecast

Page 18: Steve Edburg

Example of WRF-Fire

Page 19: Steve Edburg

Example of WRF-Fire