18
STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December 9 , 2016 Jonathan L. Halperin, M.D. The Cardiovascular Institute Mount Sinai Medical Center 49 th Annual New York Cardiovascular Symposium

STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    16

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CADChallenging Cases and

Antithrombotic Approaches

December 9, 2016

Jonathan L. Halperin, M.D.

The Cardiovascular Institute

Mount Sinai Medical Center

49th Annual New York Cardiovascular Symposium

Page 2: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

DisclosureRelationships with Industry

Consultant to the following companies involved

in developing antithrombotic drugs:

• AstraZeneca

• Bayer HealthCare

• Boehringer Ingelheim

• Bristol-Myers Squibb

• Daiichi Sankyo

• Janssen Ortho McNeil

• Johnson & Johnson

• Pfizer

Page 3: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 1

• 79 year-old woman with hypertension, hypothyroidism, and palpitation

presented with sudden onset of chest pain, palpitation and dyspnea.

• ECG: AF with RVR (140-160 bpm) and ST-segment depressions;

troponin 0.41 ng/ml (mildly elevated). Other lab values normal.

• Rate controlled with metoprolol, given aspirin and heparin and

transferred for cardiac catheterization

• Angiography: 3-vessel CAD.

• Procedure: PCI with rotational atherectomy + DES of proximal LAD and

DES of Cfx into OM1.

Page 4: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d.

+ DAPT

Rivaroxaban 15 mg daily

+ Low-dose ASA

Intended DAPT duration

1, 6, or 12 monthsEnd of treatment

12 months

AF

PCI

(with stent)

Randomizationup to 72 hours after sheath removal

VKA (INR: 2.0 to 3.0)

+ DAPTVKA (INR: 2.0 to 3.0)

+ low-dose ASA

Rivaroxaban, 15 mg daily + clopidogrel or P2Y12 inhibitorn = 2,100

700 subjects

per treatment strategy

PIONEER AF-PCITrial Design

Gibson CM, et al. Am Heart J 2014; 169: 472.

Primary endpoint

Clinically relevant bleeding

Page 5: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

First Occurrence of Clinically Significant BleedingPIONEER AF-PCI

TIM

I M

ajo

r, T

IMI M

ino

r, o

r B

lee

din

g

Re

qu

irin

g M

ed

ica

l A

tte

nti

on

(%

)

DaysNo. at risk

VKA + DAPT

26.7%

Gibson CM, et al. N Engl J Med 2016; E-published November 14, 2016

VKA + DAPT

Riva + DAPT

18.0%

p<0.00018

HR = 0.63 (95% CI 0.50-0.80)

ARR = 8.7

NNT = 12

VKA + DAPT

Riva + P2Y12

16.8%

p<0.000013

HR = 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.76)

ARR = 9.9

NNT = 11

Rivaroxaban + P2Y12

VKA + DAPT Rivaroxaban + DAPT

Riva + P2Y12 v. VKA + DAPT

HR=0.59 (95% CI: 0.47-0.76)

p <0.000013

ARR=9.9

NNT=11

Riva + DAPT v. VKA + DAPT

HR=0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.80)

p <0.00018

ARR=8.7

NNT=12

696

706

697

628

636

593

606

600

555

585

579

521

543

543

461

510

509

426

383

409

329

Riva + P2Y12

Riva + DAPT

VKA + DAPT

Number at risk:Days

Page 6: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Cardiovascular Death, MI or StrokePIONEER AF-PCI

Ca

rdio

va

sc

ula

r D

ea

th, M

yo

ca

rdia

l

Infa

rcti

on

, o

r S

tro

ke

(%

)

Days

Riva + P2Y12

Riva + DAPT

VKA + DAPT

694

704

695

648

662

635

633

640

607

621

628

579

590

596

543

562

570

514

430

457

408

VKA + DAPT

Riva + DAPT

Riva + P2Y12

Riva + P2Y12 v. VKA + DAPT

HR=1.08 (95% CI: 0.69-1.68)

p=0.750

Riva + DAPT v. VKA + DAPT

HR=0.93 (95% CI: 0.59-1.48)

p=0.765

6.5%

5.6%

6.0%

No. at riskNumber at risk:

Days

Gibson CM, et al. N Engl J Med 2016; E-published November 14, 2016

Page 7: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 1, continued

• In the cath lab, received bivalirudin, aspirin + clopidogrel.

• The following day aspirin stopped; discharged on clopidogrel, 75 mg/d

+ rivaroxaban, 15 mg/d (24 hours after sheath removal).

• The next day developed an expanding groin hematoma. Duplex arterial

ultrasound: common femoral artery pseudoaneurysm and A-V fistula.

Rivaroxaban stopped.

• Pseudoaneurysm and AV fistula closed via ultrasound-guided thrombin

injection. Stability confirmed by duplex sonography 2 days later.

• Hemoglobin stable; hematoma resolving.

• Continued clopidogrel; rivaroxaban resumed a week later.

• Staged PCI of rPDA planned.

Page 8: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 2

• 68 year old man with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy,

VT and ICD, admitted to an outside hospital after falling at home. He

was febrile, a urine culture grew E. coli, and he improved on antibiotic

therapy.

• Over the next 48 hours, he developed progressive dyspnea, the ECG

showed nonspecific ST-T wave changes in a paced rhythm, and serum

troponin increased to 8.3 ng/ml. He was given aspirin, clopidogrel, 300

mg, furosemide IV and nebulizers, and symptoms resolved.

• A TTE after this episode was technically limited, and he was transferred

for further evaluation and management.

• On arrival he was hemodynamically stable. Interrogation of the ICD

found that AF started around the time of the fall at home that prompted

hospitalization; the ventricular rhythm was paced.

Page 9: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 2, continued

• Echocardiogram: Technically limited; segmental LV dysfunction (EF

40%), worse than 2 years earlier; normal RV systolic function.

• Coronary angiography: Thrombotic occlusion of mid-LAD, partly

recanalized; 80-90% stenosis of 1st diagonal branch; diffuse, non-

obstructive disease of other vessels.

• PCI performed in diagonal artery (DES); thrombectomy and balloon

PTCA of LAD (no stent). Aspirin and clopidogrel continued.

• Subsequent echo (with contrast for endocardial border enhancement):

LV apical akinesis, EF 40%, apical mural thrombus. Heparin added.

• Antithrombotic regimen at discharge?

Page 10: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Trials of NOACs for Intracardiac Thrombus

Lip GYH, et al. Am Heart J 2015; 169: 464

X-TRA

Page 11: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Trials of NOACs for Intracardiac Thrombus

Ferner M, et al. Clin Res Cardiol 2016; 105: 29.

RE-LATED AF - AFNET 7

Page 12: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Treatment PeriodEnrollment

n=1,500

1:1

Usual Care (Heparin/VKA)

Apixaban

Cardioversion

30 + 7 days

Clinical Endpoints

Stroke/SE, Major/CRN Bleeding & Death

Randomization30 days post-cardioversion

or 90 days after enrollment

if cardioversion not performed

Apixaban For Cardioversion of AFEMANATE Trial

Ezekowitz MD, et al. Am Heart J 2016; 179: 59.

TEE

Page 13: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 3

• 29 year-old man with a Hx of PE 2 years ago and “multiple MI’s”

presents with chest pain.

• Medications: ticagrelor, metoprolol

• Quit smoking 1 month ago.

• Family history: mother had multiple miscarriages

• Past coronary interventions: 9/2014: mLAD PCI (aspirin + clopidogrel)

3/2015: PTCA

5/2016: mLAD PCI x 2 for stent thrombosis

A total of 6 procedures and 3 stents

Page 14: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 3, continued

• ECG: mid-precordial T-wave inversions

• Troponin 3.3 ng/ml; INR = 1

• Urine toxic screen: negative for cocaine; positive for cannabinoids

• Coronary angiography:

Mid-LAD -- thrombotic total occlusion of multilayered stents,

distal vessel supplied collaterals from the RCA

D1 -- 80-90% stenosis, jailed stent

• Interventions: thrombectomy; PCI with DES

• INR did not rise after 7 days of warfarin at 10 mg daily

• Discharged on aspirin + ticagrelor + rivaroxaban

Page 15: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 3, continued

Thrombophilia Testing

• Antinuclear antibody – negative

• Antiphospholipid studies:

Anticardiolipin IgM – normal

Lupus Inhibitor – normal

Β-2 glycoprotein – normal

Anti-P-serine IgG – normal

• Factor V Leiden – wild type

• Homocysteine – normal

• Factors VII, VIII, IX, X, XI – normal

• Plasminogen – normal

• Plasminogen activator inhibitor –

normal

• Thrombin time – normal

• PFA-100 ADP/collagen – normal

• PFA-100 EPI/collagen – normal

• D-dimer – normal

• Fibrinogen – normal

• Prothrombin allele – wild type

• Protein C – normal

• Protein S – normal

• Antithrombin-III – normal

• 5,10, MTHFR – wild type

• APC-resistance – normal

• PAI-1 polymorphism gene wild type

• Platelet inhibitory responses to

aspirin and ticagrelor – responsive

Page 16: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Case 3, continued

• 1 month after discharge, the patient presented with recurrent chest pain

and similar ECG changes

• Angiography: stent thrombosis

• Referred for CABG: LIMA -> LAD

• Discharged on aspirin and enoxaparin

• 1 month later, recurrent chest pain

• Angiography: thrombosis of the mid-LAD and LIMA graft

• Pain resolved, discharged without intervention on aspirin + ticagrelor +

enoxaparin

• Advised to quit using marijuana

Page 17: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December

Potential Thrombogenicity of Marijuana

• Marijuana use associated with thrombotic arterial occlusion causing acute

MI (over a dozen reported cases linking marijuana to acute MI).

• Principal biological effects attributed to Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and

other cannabinoids, mediated by activation of CB-receptors, which occur in

the CNS, peripheral and myocardial vessels

• While at lower doses, effects of THC on human platelet aggregation are

mixed, higher concentrations cause irreversible platelet aggregation,

apparently due to release of endogenous inducers but have little effect on

thrombin-induced platelet aggregation.

• THC enhances platelet GPIIb-IIIa and P-selectin expression on platelet

membranes and induces an inflammatory response in the arterial wall

(oxidative stress, platelet activation, deformation of oxidized LDL and hyper-

activation of factor VII), leading to endothelial dysfunction and thrombus

formation in coronary artery preparations in vitro.

Grambow E, et al. Biofactors 2016; PMID: 27151562

Dahdouh Z, et al. Platelets 2012; 23: 243.

Galan AM, et al. Thromb Haemost 2009; 102:511.

Page 18: STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel... · 2016. 12. 19. · STEMI vs. NSTEMI vs. STABLE CAD Challenging Cases and Antithrombotic Approaches December