96
Mahan Rykiel Associates Arnett Muldrow Associates Grimm + Parker Architects Stahl Scheaffer Engineering Kalback Planning and Design Dan Jones Landscape Architecture March 21-22, 2013 Phase I and II Work Session

Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

Mahan Rykiel AssociatesArnett Muldrow AssociatesGrimm + Parker ArchitectsStahl Scheaffer EngineeringKalback Planning and Design

Dan Jones Landscape Architecture

March 21-22, 2013

Phase I and II Work Session

Page 2: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

INTRODUCTIONNote: This PowerPoint was presented to the Steering Committee on March 21, 2013 during a series of work sessions in State College. The PowerPoint was accompanied by verbal comment, therefore, it is not intended to be a “stand alone” presentation. Some notes have been added, however, to further explain some of the slides.

The focus of the first portion of the presentation was to report back on modifications made to Phase I recommendations based on comments and concerns. The focus of the second portion of the presentation was to discuss additional market analysis and to explore emerging recommendations as they relate to development and redevelopment.

The final slides identify potential catalyst project and illustrate the preliminary strategy board which is being developed to guide implementation.

Page 3: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

INTRODUCTION

Agenda

1. Phase I Updates (Themes 1-3)

2. Additional Market Analysis

3. Phase II Emerging Recommendations (Themes 4-5)

4. Discussion Throughout

Page 4: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDTheme 1

Marketing the District: Cultivating Downtown’s Identity to Residents, Visitors and Investors

Page 5: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

5

• Color revisions approved in February

• Allow for use of "PA" in the logo for external markets

• Brand statement modifications to include references to "university" and "Central Pennsylvania"

• Consider State College’s excellent school system (this is done through the use of maroon/red in the logo and the “academic” banner that reflects both the local schools as well as PSU).

Branding Updates

Page 6: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

6

Shape the best times of your life in Downtown State College.

As one of the nation’s iconic college towns, it is here where young adults get their first taste of independence, it is here where lifelong friendships are formed, and it is here where generations of former students come back time and again to experience the energy, the memories, and the spirit of a town and university connected.

Brand Statement

Page 7: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

7

Reconnect with the best times of your life in Downtown State College.

It is home to Central Pennsylvania's largest collection of independent, locally owned shops and restaurants. It is here that independent booksellers, unique boutiques, and specialty shops thrive mere blocks from historic neighborhoods. It is here where the region comes to enjoy our international cuisine, fine dining, and casual fare in a dynamic walk-able setting.

Brand Statement (Cont.)

Page 8: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

8

Internal Market

External Market

Logo Colors and Internal/External Market Applications

Page 9: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDTheme 2

Navigating the District: Building a Pedestrian-Friendly, Multi-Modal Downtown

Page 10: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

10

Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy

Management of people, not cars

Enhance experience of pedestrian, bicycle and transitenvironments

Increase awareness and convenience of parking resources as part of Borough's parking management plan

Page 11: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

11Revised “Road Diet” Diagram (Beaver west of Atherton Removed)

Reduce to one travel lane and add parallel parking and bike lane

Widen sidewalk on south side, narrow travel lanes where possible, remove parking north side of College between Pugh and Garner

Narrow street width to 24’ to allow expansion of sidewalks. Maintain 2 travel lanes throughout.

Page 12: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

12Revised Proposed Bike Network Diagram

Page 13: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

AN

ALY

SIS

| D

OW

NTO

WN

STA

TE C

OLL

EG

E M

AS

TER

PLA

N

13

Downtown

Pedestrian Level of Service Evening

Page 14: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

14

Potential Parking Structures and Changes in On-Street Parking

Remove ParkingAdd Parking

Add Parking

Page 15: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

15

It is critical to use branding and wayfinding signage to market and promote multiple transit modes and parking resources.

Page 16: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

16

Page 17: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

17

signage

Page 18: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDTheme 3

Connecting the District: Creating a Comfortable, Cohesive and Attractive Downtown

Page 19: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDCollege Avenue

Page 20: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

20

Conclusions

With desire to accommodate motorists, transit, bicyclists and pedestrians within a limited dimension, compromise will be required

Priority audience – the pedestrian

Utilize hierarchical treatment – more design attention to the core between Fraser and Garner Streets

Cohesive design is needed along entire length

College Avenue

Page 21: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

21Ramp Connection to Allow Bicycle Access to Pattee Mall

Grand Stair, Planters at Entrance to Campus at Allen Street.

Stamped Concrete “Cobble” Color/Pattern

College Ave

Alle

n S

t.

Patte

eM

all

Allen/College Intersection

With further study, a pedestrian‐only signal phase at College and Allen may be possible. It is not feasible to restrict crossing to east side of College Avenue at this intersection.

Page 22: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

22

Hen

ders

on M

all

Pug

h S

t.

College Ave

McA

llist

er S

t.

Parking

10’-12’ Shared Use Path

Amenity Strip to Accommodate Grading (Exact Locations Determined at Design Phase)

Sidewalk Bulbout, Typ.

Ornamental Fence to Allow Views to Campus While Directing Pedestrians to Intersections

18” Brick Edge

College Avenue Sidewalk Expansion (Typical)

Page 23: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

23

College Avenue East of Pugh Street

Page 24: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

24

Gar

ner S

treet

.

College Ave

Hie

ster

St.

10’-12’ Shared Use Path

Amenity Strip to Accommodate Grading (Exact Locations Determined at Design Phase)

Sidewalk Bulbout, Typ. (Each Intersection to be Evaluated at Time of Detail Design)

Ornamental Fence to Allow Views to Campus While Directing Pedestrians to Intersections

Limestone Retaining Wall

Gathering Area and Gateway

Expanded Gathering Area

Parking

Parking Parking

4’ Sidewalk

10’-12’ Shared Use Path

18” Brick Edge

College Avenue Potential Refinements to South Side Bulbouts

In Some Areas, it is Important to Maintain as Loading/Service Zone(Each Intersection Bulbout to be Evaluated at Time of Detail Design)

With further study, a pedestrian‐only signal phase at College and Allen may be possible. It is not feasible to restrict crossing to east side of College Avenue at this intersection.

Page 25: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDCalder Way

Page 26: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

26

Page 27: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

27

There is concern that a “contra‐flow” lane on the south side of Calder Way will prevent service vehicles from stopping there for loading/unloading.  We are exploring ways to best accommodate both as there are complexities related to liability and enforcement.

Page 28: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

28

There is concern that a “contra‐flow” lane on the south side of Calder Way will prevent service vehicles from stopping there for loading/unloading.  We are exploring ways to best accommodate both as there are complexities related to liability and enforcement.

Page 29: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

29Calder Way

There is concern that a “contra‐flow” lane on the south side of Calder Way will prevent service vehicles from stopping there for loading/unloading.  We are exploring ways to best accommodate both as there are complexities related to liability and enforcement.

Page 30: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

30

Additional Market Analysis

Page 31: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

31

Office Market• Little Speculative Office Market Data, Rents 15-20 PSF range

• National Trend For Tech Businesses to Locate in Downtowns

• Co-working Space/Incubators is Growing Trend

Hotel Market• Occupancy rates have declined, local hoteliers are concerned about competition

• Average Daily Rates (ADR) and Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR) is high when compared to the state.

• Trend toward major hotel chains to have downtown locations.

Additional Market Analysis

Page 32: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

32

Housing Market• The 2010 Census indicates that State College Borough has reversed its relatively stagnant population figures and has grown more significantly in the last 10 years.

• The student population is significantly impacting single family development in State College.

• Family households in the Borough are declining.

• There is a qualified opportunity for non-student residential development in downtown.

• The Borough should consider locations appropriate for new high quality residential housing in downtown that is geared toward the student population. To the degree possible, this housing should be marketed to the graduate student population.

Additional Market Analysis

Page 33: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDTheme 4

Living in the District: Establishing Downtown as a Place for Professionals to Live and Work

Page 34: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

34

• Good – ability for bonuses and signature development

• Multiple amendments result in confusion/contradictions

• Adherence to prescribed bulk regulations may have unintended consequences

• Urban Village District - good to protect character of neighborhood

• UV - maximum building footprint not practical

• UV- building heights – no transition/conflict with maximum building footprints

Zoning Analysis

Page 35: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

35

• Good to protect historic core with 45’ height limit

• Good to allow for increased heights with incentives

• Confusion in ordinance: some discuss height in terms of feet/# floors; others just feet

• Flexibility needed to encourage well-proportioned first floors (14-20’) and rooftop articulation

Building Heights Analysis

Page 36: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

36

Signature Signature

Diagram highlights current allowable building heights and residential FAR’s.  Signature Development is allowed  only within the boundaries shown by dashed black line.

Page 37: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

37

Importance of downtown density• Protects neighborhoods

• Contributes to walkability

• Less dependency on automobile

• Allows transit to be cost effective

• Economic viability where land values high

But high quality design is critical• Scale

• Orientation to street

• Articulation and materials

Density

Page 38: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

38Density TransitionProject in Arlington, VA shows how multi‐family housing can be designed to transition to single family neighborhood to the left (off screen)

Page 39: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

39Density Transition Zooming out shows that same development transitioning to higher densities.

Page 40: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

40Density Transition Zooming out shows that same development transitioning to higher densities.

Page 41: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

41State College – Insufficient First Floors

Many first floors in State College lack the appropriate height for retail uses and to provide a comfortable scale. First floors should be 14‐20’.

Page 42: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

42State College Poor Relationship to Street

Page 43: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

43Good Relationship to Street (College Park, MD)

Page 44: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

44State College Four Story (Poor Relationship to Street)

Page 45: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

45High Rise (Good Relationship to Street)

These examples illustrate that a well‐designed multi‐story building with appropriate scaled first floor can be a positive contribution to the urban environment. The preceding slide illustrates that a poorly designed low building can have a negative impact on the urban environment.

Page 46: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

46Student Housing Precedents

Page 47: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

47

Page 48: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

48Student Housing Precedents

Page 49: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

49State College Precedents

Existing positive examples in State College (scale, proportion, appropriate first floor, etc.)

Page 50: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

50

• Consider more flexibility in bulk regulations (with design incentives)

• Incent quality downtown student housing

• Undertake a comprehensive re-write of the zoning code

Key Recommendations

Page 51: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

51

• Create a Housing Trust Fund

• Develop a co-working incubator

• Create a local investment strategy

• Study public-private partnerships in other communities

Key Recommendations

Page 52: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

52

• Identify/promote key development opportunities

• Advance the West End Revitalization Plan

• Reinforce the downtown core as a “traditional downtown”

• Reinforce the East End as a “collegiate district”

Key Recommendations

Page 53: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

53Short and Long-Term Opportunity Sites

Page 54: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

54Master Plan Framework Diagram

Page 55: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

55Downtown Districts

Page 56: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

56

College

Beaver

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion

Page 57: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

57

P

College

Beaver

Emphasize:• Mix Use• Graduate/Faculty 

/Workforce Housing• Non‐Student Housing

Emphasize:• Academic• Mix Use• Hotel/Co‐

Work/Incubator• Graduate/Faculty 

/Workforce Housing

Emphasize:• Mix Use• Hotel/Co‐

Work/Incubator• Non‐Student Housing

Emphasize:• Mix Use• Student Housing

Page 58: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

58

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion. Programs and densities illustrate potential for site with modifications to existing zoning. 

Page 59: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

59

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion.  

Page 60: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

60

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion. Programs and densities illustrate potential for some sites using Signature Development classification. 

Page 61: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

61

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion.  

Page 62: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

62

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion.  

Page 63: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

63

Page 64: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

64

Memorial Field

Illustration showing potential of “Allen Square” and how new development can activate existing and potential open spaces and better connect open spaces to Allen Street and downtown core.

Page 65: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

65

Page 66: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

66

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion.  

Page 67: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

67

Three levels of hotel with condos above (Near JHU, Baltimore)

Page 68: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

68

Existing view looking toward southeast corner of Pugh and College. View shows existing one‐story development where multi‐story development is more appropriate.

Page 69: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

69

Penn State Campus Model view looking toward southeast corner of Pugh and 

College. View shows existing one‐story development where multi‐story development is more appropriate.

Page 70: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

70

Penn State Campus Model view looking toward southeast corner of Pugh and 

College. View shows potential  four‐story development.

Page 71: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

71

Penn State Campus Sketch view looking toward southeast corner of Pugh and 

College. View shows potential  four‐story development and enhancements to College Avenue.

Page 72: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

72

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion.  

Page 73: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

73

Mixed‐use development, Greenville, SC.  Co‐work space fronting lower level parking

Page 74: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

74

Mixed‐use development, Greenville, SC.  Co‐work space fronting lower level parking

Page 75: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

75

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion. Programs and densities illustrate potential for site with additional incentives to allow for increased setbacks (and bike lanes) on Garner) 

Page 76: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

76

Penn State Campus

Model view looking toward important opportunity sites in the vicinity of Garner Street and College/Beaver Avenues. View shows existing condition.

Page 77: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

77

Penn State Campus

Model view looking toward important opportunity sites in the vicinity of Garner Street and College/Beaver Avenues. View shows potential condition with new development and potential long‐term development along College Avenue.

Page 78: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

78

Good examples showing how structured parking can be accommodated above ground‐level retail.

Page 79: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

79

Good examples showing how structured parking can be accommodated above ground‐level retail.

Page 80: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

80

Well‐designed student housing near Johns Hopkins University, showing importance of active street level uses and well proportioned first floor.

Page 81: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

81

NOTE: Drawing represents preliminary thinking and was developed for work session discussion.  

Page 82: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDTheme 5

Managing the District: Fostering a Safe and Appealing Downtown

Page 83: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

83

• Communicate and promote initiatives done to date

• Revisit recommendations of the Responsible Hospitality Institute

• Continue to implement recommendations of the State College Borough Sustainable Neighborhood Report 2012

• Continue to promote regularly scheduled downtown events and assess economic impact of downtown events

Key Recommendations

Page 84: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

84

Allen Street – The Concept (Small Event)

Bea

ver A

venu

e

Col

lege

Ave

nue

Cal

der W

ay

Allen St. – Calder Way Intersection Remains Clear to Allow for Vehicular Circulation Between Beaver Ave. and Calder Way

Small Event

Col

lege

Ave

Cal

der W

ay

Bea

ver A

venu

e

Allen Street

Page 85: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

85Typical Day

Page 86: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

86Festival/Event

Page 87: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

87Downtown Core – Primary Event Zone

Page 88: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

88Allen Promenade Event Zone

Page 89: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

89Allen Square Event Zone

Page 90: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

THE VISION: LOOKING FORWARDCatalyst Project

Page 91: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

91

College

Beaver

Fraser Street 

Allen Street 

Beaver (Portions): 

Completed Streetscapes

Page 92: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

92

College

Beaver

Calder Way(Burrowes to McAlister)

Allen Street Promenade and Intersection at College 

Pugh (Portion): 

Catalyst Streetscape Project (Completes the Downtown Core)

Beaver (Remaining Portions) 

Page 93: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

Downtown State College Master Plan Implementation Strategy Board

Strategies First Steps 2013-2014 Long Term 2016-2023Next Steps 2014-2016 Goal

Install advanced stop lines Develop action plan for intersection safety Continue to accommodate bikes in

downtown Enforce bike regulations Explore options for new parking structures Continue parking management changes Launch parking marketing pieces Re-examine on-site parking requirements Continue to explore Universal Access

Implement Allen Street promenade Implement PennDOT turnback for

College and Beaver Ave. Begin implementing changes to Calder

way including branding Implement changes to West College

Continue to implement RHI recommendations

Continue to implement Sustainable Neighborhood report recommendation

Host a midnight stroll downtown Reinforce the downtown core as a

“traditional downtown”

Implement initial phase of Pugh Street Develop detailed public art plan Explore ways to incent higher quality design in

downtown Explore feasibility of Allen Square Adopt cohesive streetscape design elements Experiment with pop-up cafes on Allen St. Initiate Allen Street Promenade detail design

Employ a road diet in a pilot project in downtown Implement intersection safety for key intersections

identified in the plan Explore new parking management techniques Deploy wayfinding plan Explore valet parking Enhance transit stops/deploy branding Expand bike network

Complete a redesign of the Borough’s logo Continue implementing brand extension for

events Continue to introduce new events Roll out collateral material for the brand Continue rolling out downtown marketing

plan

Adopt the Brand Statement/Tagline Convene a committee to deploy the brand Host a brand launch event Redesign DID letterhead, cards, webpage Begin redesigning event logos. Introduce downtown marketing program Install banners with the branding identity Introduce new events

Implement College Avenue streetscape design

Continue Calder way improvements Implement Beaver Ave streetscape Implement Heister Promenade Complete Pugh Street enhancements with

garage redevelopment

Refine and expand downtown marketing plan

Contemplate licensing rights for merchants to use the downtown brand

Explore more alcohol free venues in downtown

Relocate Pugh Street Garage as part of a mixed use development

Assess economic impact of events

Continue road diets on other streets Update intersection safety study Implement adaptive traffic control Explore a multi-modal transportation center Work to make bus routes attractive to

commuters Continue to implement wayfinding

Reinforce east end of downtown as a Collegiate District

Theme Three: Connecting the District

Theme Five:Managing the District

Theme One: Marketing the District

Theme Two: Navigating the District

State College will cultivate downtown’s identity to

residents, visitors, and investors through a comprehensive

marketing initiative.

Downtown State College will continue to evolve as a

pedestrian friendly, multi-modal district.

Downtown State College will be a comfortable, cohesive, and

attractive district.

Downtown State College will thrive as a safe and appealing

destination.

• Borough of State College • Downtown Improvement District •Penn State University

Implement co-working incubator downtown Explore a local investment strategy Undertake a comprehensive re-write of the

zoning code Advance West End Revitalization

Study public/private partnerships in other communities

Create a housing trust fund Identify and work with key property owners Incent quality student housing downtown Explore more flexibility in bulk regulations Advance Continue to coordinate Hillel and Garner Ctr.

Theme Four:Living in the District

Downtown State College will emerge as a place where

professionals will live and work.

•Private Sector

Page 94: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

94

August 20-22: Project Kick-off

November 5-8: Planning Charrette

January 25-Feb 15: Phase I Draft

March 21-22: Phase I /Phase II Work Sessions

April 22/23: Presentation of Final Draft

June 2013: Master Plan Complete

Schedule

Page 95: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

EM

ER

GIN

G ID

EA

S |

DO

WN

TOW

N S

TATE

CO

LLE

GE

MA

STE

R P

LAN

95

More Information

www.statecollegepa.us/engagesc

Page 96: Steering committee presentation 032113 annotated

Mahan Rykiel AssociatesArnett Muldrow AssociatesGrimm + Parker ArchitectsStahl Scheaffer EngineeringKalback Planning and Design

Dan Jones Landscape Architecture

March 21-22, 2013

Phase I and II Work Session