Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014
Janie Temple
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Introduction
Brief SAM History
Intro to SAM-V3 functionality
Past and Current SAM projects
Future additions to SAM
Suggestions from model users
2
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V1: Completed 2004 ◦ Base year 1998
◦ Forecast year 2025
◦ No built in capabilities for interim year or toll analysis
SAM-V2: Completed 2011 ◦ Base year 2003
◦ Interim and forecast years 2010, 2020, 2030, and 2035
◦ Incorporated intercity toll analysis capabilities
◦ Added the TX-NAFF freight model component
SAM-V3: Completed 2013 ◦ Base year 2010
◦ Interim and forecast years 2010, 2020, 2030, and 2040
◦ Interpolated non-standard years supported
Background of SAM
3
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
TxNAFF Integration
Estimated Rail Tonnage Capacity
4
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Update: General Changes
Future road projects as of SAM-V3
All networks were reviewed and updated with current MPO plans
◦ Fiscally constrained projects have changed
drastically since last update
5
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Update: General Changes
Updated to run in
TransCAD 6.0
More detail in
neighboring states
Incorporated recent Workplace Surveys to
improve the attraction model
6
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Update: Revalidation of SAM-V3
SAM-V3 was revalidated to a new 2010 base year – Benefits from newly available data such as 2010
census and the latest available urban area demographics
– First version of SAM that aligns with a census year
Forecast years: 2020, 2030, 2040 Used validation criteria from Travel Model
Improvement Program’s (TMIP) Validation Manual
7
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Update: Automate Multimodal Assignment
In SAM-V2, all preliminary steps for the transit, HSR, rail and air were completed in the SAM run
Completing assignment took several extra steps
In SAM-V3, these steps were integrated into model run
Improvements:
◦ Simplified these model runs
◦ Fewer assumptions made
◦ Increased consistency and
repeatability of results
Freight and Pass. Rail
Air Links
8
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Update: Demographics Interpolation
2010 2020 2018?
9
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Update: Demographics Interpolation
SAM-V3 includes a full demographics interpolation tool ◦ For any year between 2010 and 2040
Enhances consistency between different users and projects ◦ Create a “level playing field” as a starting
point for studies using SAM
Adjustments not ‘set in stone’, but subject to the judgment of the modeler
10
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
SAM-V3 Mode Alternatives
Drive alone, Shared
ride 2, and Shared ride 3+
Urban bus and
Urban rail
Intercity rail with drive,
rail, and walk access
High speed rail with drive, rail,
and walk access
Highway modes Urban transit
Intercity modes
Air with drive, rail, and bus access
11
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
TxDOT is currently planning
High Speed Intercity
Passenger Rail
Stated Goals:
Speeds 150mph+
Connections to airports, city
centers, other rail stations
Using features incorporated into
SAM-V3 in the recent update
Many routes being considered,
including Oklahoma City to
Laredo or the Valley
12
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
Two additional High Speed
Rail projects are using SAM:
o the Houston-Dallas
corridor study and
o the Dallas-Fort Worth
corridor study
Located partially along the
federally-designated South
Central High-Speed Rail
Corridor
13
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
Lone Star Rail District
Project 1 (Jacobs Engineering): Analysis of Passenger Flows in Austin-San Antonio Corridor
◦ LSTAR study focusing on analyzing the ridership if
Union Pacific ROW parallel to I-35 were converted
to passenger rail
Project 2 (Atkins Global): Analysis of Freight (Truck and Rail) Flows in the same corridor
◦ Primarily focused on the effects of freight rail
relocation – as road/fuel costs increase
◦ Currently studying new freight line further east –
between Taylor and Seguin – evaluating many options
14
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
Lone Star Rail District
15
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
Rural Transportation
Plan (Atkins Global)
◦ Adopted June 28th,
2012
◦ Used to identify and
rank the Top 3
Projects per District
16
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
Rural Transportation Plan (Atkins Global)
Rankings were based on
All rural projects that
would add capacity
were input in SAM
Travel time
improvement, V/C &
LOS were calculated
for each
Commodity flow (in
annual tonnage of truck
freight) from SAM was
also a factor
17
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM Use
I-69 Innovative Finance
Multi-state effort
looking into the
financing of I-69
Internally tested a
segment from
Texarkana to Marshall
to determine potential
future volumes
18
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Past and Current SAM-V3 Use
19
Project Lead
IH 10 Scenario testing Jacobs Engineering
Passenger and freight modeling – Texas Freight Plan HDR Engineering
Texas Freight Plan CDM Smith and Atkins Global
IH 35 to SH 130 Connector Study Alliance Transportation Group
Groundwork for Dynamic Traffic Assignment development Center for Transp. Research
Transloading/Intermodal Feasibility Study for Rio Grande COG Parsons Brinckerhoff
Texas Transportation Plan Update CH2M Hill
South Padre 2nd Causeway and toll revenue studies CDM Smith
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Future SAM Changes: Incorporate Urban Models
The areas with the greatest need for more detail are
the urban model areas
20
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Future SAM Changes: Incorporate Urban Models
Potential for improvements:
– Greater accuracy of results in the urban area
– More overall sensitivity to changes
– Greater toll sensitivity
Would allow more consistency when comparing
results of regional and statewide levels
21
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Notes to users
All networks, TAZs, demographics, and the mode choice
model have been checked and updated to the extent
possible for statewide datasets.
However, every project is different and takes place in a
different location at a different scale.
Professional judgment and local knowledge should be
used to refine any aspect of the model to better suit the
needs of the study.
These model changes need to be provided to TPP after
project completion for possible addition into the model.
SAM is a platform
22
SAM-V3 Planning Conference Presentation – June 4, 2014
Statewide Analysis Model
Suggestions for future enhancements to SAM are welcome
[email protected] [email protected] Questions/Comments?
23