Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
STATE OF STATES
The Debt Overhang
Background
In the last year, Nigeria has experienced significant macroeconomic and fiscal imbalances. Following
the continued decline in oil revenues since mid-2014 amidst slow policy responses, the economy
gradually slowed into negative growth in 2016. Fiscal deficits have remained wide, debts are rising,
and governments are faltering on public sector wages. The economy’s prospects have continued to
diverge from those with more diverse revenue sources. Among urgent reforms needed are actions to
rationalize government expenditure and improve domestic revenue mobilization to ensure that the
country transits into fiscal sustainability.
The current environment of lower oil prices adds urgency to long-standing efforts to reduce the
country’s widespread fiscal vulnerabilities. Although the government has initiated significant measures
of fiscal reform and consolidation, including four bailout packages for State governments1, these
measures are unlikely to be adequate or consistent with inter-temporal fiscal sustainability. Public
sector wage bills are among the key threats to fiscal sustainability at the sub-national level, costing up
to 40 percent of the total expenditure of States according to recent reports by the NGF2.
This paper provides an update on Nigeria’s fiscal crisis, specifically on the debt profile of State
governments. Debts data are based on details of salary and pension arrears for States, local
governments and other agencies and parastatals as at 30th April 2017, and debt servicing from
federation allocation, including deductions for contractual obligations (irrevocable standing payment
orders), bond issuance, restructured commercial bank loans, excess crude account-backed loans, salary
bailout, foreign loans and others.
The paper is organized in two parts. The first part lays out the stylized facts about the debt
environment across the 36 States of the federation. It underlines the largely homogenous negative
fiscal condition of States, which heightened with the slump in oil revenues and continued to worsen
after bailout responses from the federal government. It also shows that government reforms targeted
at maintaining fiscal stability through the use of bailouts have not been sufficient in pulling States out
of the crisis. The second section suggests more contextualized policy responses given the constrained
fiscal space, as part of ongoing reforms to improve fiscal stability in the country.
1 In July 2015, the federal government released three bailout facilities to State governments – an excess crude
account-backed loan facility for 34 States, a salary bailout for 31 States, and restructured commercial bank loans
for 23 States. One year after, in June 2016, the government announced a one-year budget support facility of
N14.16 billion per State to 35 State governments. 2 Based on the report of the fiscal sustainability of States, April 2017
2
The Outsized Arrears: salaries, allowances, pensions and gratuities
Total arrears owed to employees of States, local governments and other State agencies and parastatals was recorded as N963 billion – around
1 percent of the country’s GDP3 and nearly 40 percent of the total recurrent revenue4 of States. The amount is owed by 30 out of the 36
States of the federation excluding Anambra, Bauchi, Gombe, Jigawa, Lagos and Zamfara where no outstanding was reported. These debts
vary across States, from as high as N81.5 billion in Kogi State to a median of N28.4 billion in Plateau and N2 billion in Borno State (see
figure 1). Overall, the 3 most indebted States were Kogi (N81.5 billion), Imo (N80.7 billion) and Osun (N71.9 billion).
Data Source: State Ministries of Finance, Federal Ministry of Finance, 2017 Notes: * arrears reported as nil.
3 Based on 2016 figures. 4 Total recurrent revenue includes federation allocation and the internally generated revenue of States recorded as N2.4 trillion in 2016.
-
10,000,000,000
20,000,000,000
30,000,000,000
40,000,000,000
50,000,000,000
60,000,000,000
70,000,000,000
80,000,000,000
90,000,000,000
Ko
gi
Imo
Osu
n
Del
ta
Ben
ue
Bay
elsa
Akw
a Ib
om
Nas
araw
a
Oyo
Ekit
i
En
ugu
On
do
Kan
o
Kw
ara
Pla
teau
Cro
ss R
iver
Tar
aba
Ab
ia
Eb
on
yi
Ogu
n
Ed
o
Ad
amaw
a
Kad
un
a
Nig
er
Kat
sin
a
Keb
bi
Yo
be
So
koto
Riv
ers
Bo
rno
An
amb
ra*
Bau
chi*
Go
mb
e*
Jiga
wa*
Lag
os*
Zam
fara
*
NG
N
FIGURE 1 : ARREARS OF STATES, APRIL 2017
State LGCs Agencies and Parastatals
3
Arrears are the highest at the local government level
The highest number of employees affected are employed across local government councils (LGCs).
Their total share outstanding was N548.6 billion (57 percent), compared with N347.2 billion (36.1
percent) for State officials and N67.2 billion (7 percent) for State agencies and parastatals (see figure
2). Pensions and gratuities for LGCs recorded the longest tenures of default for most States, reaching
as far back as 1996 for Nasarawa, 2000 for Edo and 2003 for Borno.
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data State Ministries of Finance, Federal Ministry of Finance, 2017
State LGCs Parastatals
Total Arrears 347,225,082,610 548,592,332,194 67,160,070,309
Share 36.1% 57.0% 7.0%
-
100,000,000,000
200,000,000,000
300,000,000,000
400,000,000,000
500,000,000,000
600,000,000,000
NG
N
FIGURE 2 : DISTRIBUTION OF ARREARS
4
5
Trend in Federation Deductions
Federation deductions includes service payments for contractual obligations (irrevocable standing
payment orders), counterpart funds, bond issuance, restructured commercial bank loans, excess crude
account-backed loans, salary bailout, foreign loans and other loans deducted at source from States’
gross federation revenues before transfers are made. Over the last 7 years, the amount has more than
tripled from N93.8 billion in 2010 to N336 billion in 2016 (see figure 3). Following the introduction
of bailout packages to States in 2015, federation deductions rose by more than 40 percent from N239
billion to N336 billion.
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, 2017
The pressures of federation deductions are startling when compared in terms of the share of States’
gross allocation. The trend became acute and destabilizing in 2016, when deductions (% of gross
allocation) rose to 21 percent from 8 percent in 2014 and 12 percent in 2015 (see figure 4). The swing
has also continued in 2017, reducing only marginally to 19.4 percent in the first half.
The phenomenon has created significant risks to the implementation of State budgets and even debt
risks for others. For instance, Osun State defaulted on these service payments in December 2015,
March, June and October 2016, when deductions were higher than the State’s gross allocation.
93,788,661,283
160,665,214,520
210,026,109,574
167,533,091,557
203,366,551,925
239,344,652,034
335,968,385,961
0
50,000,000,000
100,000,000,000
150,000,000,000
200,000,000,000
250,000,000,000
300,000,000,000
350,000,000,000
400,000,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
NG
N
FIGURE 3 : DEDUCTIONS FROM FEDERATION TRANSFERS
6
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, 2017
Notes: HY-2017 refers to the period from January – June 2017
4.5%5.9%
7.4%
5.4%
7.6%
11.9%
20.8%19.4%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 HY-2017
FIGURE 4 : FEDERATION DEDUCTIONS (% OF GROSS ALLOCATION)
In 2016, federation deductions were highest for Lagos (N30.6 billion), Bayelsa (N29.7 billion) and Delta (N25.9 billion) and lowest for Ebonyi
(N1.7 billion), Yobe (N1.5 billion) and Jigawa (N1.3 billion). Lagos state maintained the highest share as a result of its high foreign debt of
N421 billion – nearly 40 percent of the total debts of the 36 States. The state is also financing two bond issuance programmes with the sum
of N2 billion monthly. Bayelsa followed as a result of its high cost of ISPOs (N1.2billion monthly5) and restructured bank loans. Delta is
financing among others, a bond issuance programme (N1.1 billion monthly) and restructured commercial bank loans (N920 billion monthly).
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, 2017
5 ISPO financing has declined to N421 billion monthly in 2017.
0
5,000,000,000
10,000,000,000
15,000,000,000
20,000,000,000
25,000,000,000
30,000,000,000
35,000,000,000L
ago
s
Bay
elsa
Del
ta
Osu
n
Riv
ers
Cro
ss R
iver
Pla
teau
On
do
Ogu
n
Akw
a Ib
om
Ed
o
Ekit
i
Zam
fara
Go
mb
e
Imo
Ben
ue
Bau
chi
Nig
er
Oyo
Ko
gi
Kan
o
Tar
aba
Kw
ara
Kad
un
a
Ad
amaw
a
Ab
ia
Bo
rno
Keb
bi
Kat
sin
a
En
ugu
Nas
araw
a
So
koto
An
amb
ra
Eb
on
yi
Yo
be
Jiga
wa
NG
N
FIGURE 5 :FEDERATION DEDUCTION OF STATES , 2014 - 2016
2014 2016
8
In relative terms, Osun, Cross River and Plateau recoded the highest cuts from their gross allocation in 2016 – reaching 82 percent, 49 percent
and 41 percent respectively. Since these States maintain relatively smaller federation inflows, the impact of deductions has been more
destabilising, compared to Anambra (4.9 percent), Yobe (4.5 percent) and Jigawa (3.6 percent) that recorded the lowest share of federation
deductions in the year.
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, 2017
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Osu
n
Cro
ss R
iver
Pla
teau
Ogu
n
Ekit
i
Bay
elsa
Ed
o
Zam
fara
Go
mb
e
On
do
Lag
os
Del
ta
Riv
ers
Ben
ue
Imo
Bau
chi
Nig
er
Oyo
Kw
ara
Tar
aba
Ko
gi
Ad
amaw
a
Akw
a Ib
om
Ab
ia
Kad
un
a
En
ugu
Keb
bi
Bo
rno
Nas
araw
a
Kan
o
Kat
sin
a
So
koto
Eb
on
yi
An
amb
ra
Yo
be
Jiga
wa
NG
N
FIGURE 6 : FEDERATION DEDUCTION (% OF GROSS ALLOCATION), 2014 - 2016
2014 2016
9
Debt financing continue to make up the largest share of federation deductions, with an average of 91 percent in 2016, with bailout-linked
debts (ECA loan facility, salary bailout and restructured commercial bank loans) attributing for around 50 percent (see figures 7 and 8).
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, 2017
Notes: Debt component includes service payments for bond issuance, restructuring of commercial bank loans into FGN bonds, contractual obligations
(ISPOs), ECA loan facility, salary bailout, foreign and other loans; while other obligations are services for counterpart funds such as the commercial
agricultural credit and other refunds.
(20.00)
-
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
Ab
ia
Ad
amaw
a
Akw
a Ib
om
An
amb
ra
Bau
chi
Bay
elsa
Ben
ue
Bo
rno
Cro
ss R
iver
Del
ta
Eb
on
yi
Edo
Ekit
i
En
ugu
Go
mb
e
Imo
Jiga
wa
Kad
un
a
Kan
o
Kat
sin
a
Keb
bi
Ko
gi
Kw
ara
Lag
os
Nas
araw
a
Nig
er
Ogu
n
On
do
Osu
n
Oyo
Pla
teau
Riv
ers
So
koto
Tar
aba
Yo
be
Zam
fara
FIGURE 7 : COMPOSITION OF FEDERATION DEDUCTIONS , 2016
Debt component Other obligations
10
Data Source: Author’s computation based on data from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, 2017
0
20
40
60
80
100
120L
ago
s
Osu
n
Del
ta
Bay
elsa
Cro
ss R
iver
Pla
teau
Ogu
n
On
do
Edo
Akw
a Ib
om
Ekit
i
Zam
fara
Go
mb
e
Imo
Nig
er
Ben
ue
Oyo
Riv
ers
Ko
gi
Kad
un
a
Kw
ara
Kan
o
Ad
amaw
a
Tar
aba
Bo
rno
Ab
ia
Kat
sin
a
En
ugu
Bau
chi
Nas
araw
a
So
koto
Keb
bi
Yo
be
Eb
on
yi
An
amb
ra
Jiga
wa
per
cen
t
FIGURE 8 : FEDERATION DEDUCTIONS , DEBT COMPONENTS, 2016
Bond issuance Restructured commercial bank loans Contractual obligations (ISPOs)
ECA loan facility Salary bailout Foreign loans
Others
11
12
Lessons
Although government policy responses in the last two years have targeted fiscal stability, risks have
remained. Arrears for salaries, allowances, pensions and gratuities put at a record N963 billion as at
30 April 2017 are unlikely to be cleared in the short term for a number of reasons – including
competing budgetary needs, pressures from rising federation deductions and low oil prices. This calls
for among others, stronger fiscal consolidation and policy adjustments specifically targeted at public
sector employment. Some of these include the following:
Full biometric exercise to eliminate payroll fraud. Although 29 States report to have carried out
a biometric exercise for public-sector employees, this should cover all workers, including local
government employees to ensure that they produce clean sheets for payroll implementation and save
cost in the process.
Reducing the excesses of public employment. Government must take deliberate steps to support
a progressive reduction in the size of the public workforce and public wage moderation while also
strengthening private-sector led employment growth. To support a reduction in the size of public
employment, a civil service review can help identify nonessential positions that should not be renewed
when they become vacant. This will facilitate a gradual rebalancing that will bring about productivity.
Governments must also curtail the lure of using the civil service for patronage and as employers of
last resort.
Improving the quality of government spending in education. Over the years, public sector jobs
have continued to remain attractive to job seekers who are unable to find opportunities in the private
sector. Notwithstanding the recuring wage crises, pressures for public employment has remained
significantly high. Education investment should target skills most needed in the private sector,
including entrepreneurship and vocational skills that are required to facilitate labour mobility from
public to private sector jobs.
Providing unemployment insurance. Fiscal social contracts and other social investment
programmes provide opportunities for governments to develop insurance schemes that provide the
unemployed with a minimum income or social service in health, education or agriculture, while
developing other long term measures.
13
APPENDIX
14