15
STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston, WV 25321-0273 Fax: (304) 340-3801 (304) 340-3835 [email protected]

STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC.

FALL 2012 MEETING

PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal”

Alexander Macia, Member

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

P.O. Box 273

Charleston, WV 25321-0273

Fax: (304) 340-3801

(304) 340-3835

[email protected]

Page 2: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

THE FUTURE OF COAL: AN OVERVIEW

I. COAL BASICS

II. COAL USES

III. COAL FUTURE

Page 3: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

I. COAL BASICS

Page 4: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

COAL RESERVES ESTIMATED BY COUNTRY

• U.S. 27.5%• Russia 18.3%• China 13.3%• Other Non OECD

– Europe & Eurasia 10.7%• Australia & New Zealand 8.9%• India 7.0%• OECD Europe 6.5%• Africa 3.7%• Central & South America 0.9%• Rest of World 3.2%

Source: U.S. Energy Information Admin., “International Energy Outlook 2011”

Page 5: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

MAJOR COAL DEPOSITS IN THE UNITED STATES

Source: U.S. Energy Information Admin., “International Energy Outlook 2011”

Page 6: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

COAL PRODUCING REGIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

• Appalachian Coal Region– More than 1/3 of production– West Virginia is largest coal producing state in region (2nd in the U.S.)– End-users: power plants, steel mills and export

• Interior Coal Region – Texas largest producer in region– Illinois Basin coal is high sulfur

• Western Coal Region– Over ½ of all coal produced in United States– Wyoming is largest coal producer in region and United States– 9 of top 10 largest mines are in Wyoming– Black Thunder Mine and North Antelope Rochelle Mine together produce

more coal than West Virginia

Page 7: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

COAL TYPES FOUND IN THE UNITED STATES• ANTHRACITE

– Highest carbon content (86-98%)– Heat value of @ 15,000 BTUs per pound – Used for home heating– Mined almost exclusively in North Eastern Pennsylvania

• BITUMINOUS– High carbon content (45-86%)– Heat value of 10,500-15,5000 BTUs per pound– Used for electricity generation and steel making (as coke)

• Subbituminous– Low carbon content (35-45%)– Heat value of 8,300-13,000 BTUs per pound– Used for electricity generation– Low sulfur– Located primarily in the Western States (Wyoming’s Powder River Basin)

• LIGNITE– Lowest carbon content (35-45%)– Heat value of @ 4,000-8,300 BTUs per pound – Used exclusively for electricity generation

Page 8: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

LARGEST COAL PRODUCERS IN THE UNITED STATES

Controlling Company Production (thousands short tons) Percent of Production

Peabody Energy 191,943 17.7

Arch Coal, Inc. 173,295 16.0

Cloud Peak 93,734 8.6

Alpha Natural Resources 80,681 7.4

Consol Energy, Inc. 61,294 5.7

Alpha Appalachian Holdings* 37,793 3.5

* Formerly Massey Energy Co.

Page 9: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

HOW MUCH COAL IS LEFT?

• 2011 Annual Production:– 1.1 billion short tons

• Estimated Recoverable Reserves at Producing Mines:– 17.9 billion short tons

• Estimated Recoverable Reserves:– 259 billion short tons

• Demonstrated Reserve Base:– 484.5 billion short tons

• Total Coal Resources– @ 4 trillion short tons

Page 10: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

Or…

– 239 years based upon current production and estimated recoverable reserves

Page 11: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

II. COAL USAGE

But, in 1st Quarter 2012 coal dropped to 36%

Page 12: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

III. COAL FUTURE

• Natural gas prices fell 7.5% in 2011

• Mild winter 2011-2012

• Increasing stockpiles

• Environmental Regulations create uncertainty

Page 13: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

• Coal Plant Retirements Since 2010– 106 coal plants (319 units)– 42,895 MW (13%) of fleet)– Average age: 50 + years

THE ENERGY MARKET REACTS

Page 14: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

• Spurred by Cheap Natural Gas– Development of shale gases increased production– Leading to drop in prices– 2008 was $12/1,000 cubic feet– 2012 now @ $4/1,000 cubic feet

And….

PRICE PRESSURE INCREASES ON COAL PLANTS

Page 15: STATE LAW RESOURCES, INC. FALL 2012 MEETING PANEL DISCUSSION: “The Future of Coal” Alexander Macia, Member Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC P.O. Box 273 Charleston,

• Mercury Air Toxics Standard– Issued Final Rule 12/11 and set numeric emission limits for mercury, toxic metals, and

acidic gases– Applicable to new sources; targets coal plants– Compliance: 3 years from final rule (3/15)– EPA reconsidering new limits and taking further comments

• Cross State Air Pollution Rule– Requires states to set emission standards for power plants to reduce ozone and fine

particle pollutions– Requiring upwind states to reduce only their own significant contributions to downwind

states non-attainment– BUT, in EME Homer City Generation v. EPA, DC Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the

rule for exceeding statutory authority– Petition for rehearing en banc is pending

INCREASED ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS