State Improvement Approach

A State-Level Response to District Need

Oren Christmas Jeff Diedrich

Office of Special EducationFall Forum 1

Why?2

Elementary & Secondary Education Act: Key Principles

Ready for career & college

3

Ready for career & college

State developed systems of differentiated recognition, accountability and support

Elementary & Secondary Education Act: Key Principles

4

Ready for career & college

State developed systems of differentiated recognition, accountability and support

Support effective instruction and leadership

Elementary & Secondary Education Act: Key Principles

5

Ready for career & college

State developed systems of differentiated recognition, accountability and support

Support effective instruction and leadership

Reduce duplication

Elementary & Secondary Education Act: Key Principles

6

Genera

l S

up

erv

isio

n S

yst

em

7

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES8

“The science of dialogue is truly a science that enables people from all walks of life to become ‘systems thinkers.’ This is the sole rationale for its invention and evolution.”

-Aleco Christakis

The Science of Structured Dialogic Design

9

Private TA Provider

Non-Traditional TA/PD

National TA

Research on TA Structures/Best Practices

ISD – Curriculum & Instruction

ISD Superintendent

MTSS

Systems Development

MAPS

Adult Learning Styles

Cyber/Virtual Schools

MDE – Assessment

LEA – Principal

Drop-Out Prevention

Data Coordination

MDE-OSE Performance

Reporting

MDE-OSE Program

Accountability

Early ChildhoodParent

Parent TrainingInitiative

SEAC

ISD–Director ofSpecial Education

LEA– Director ofSpecial Education

High-Incidence

Center-Based Program

Teacher – Special EducationTeacher

– Gen. Ed.

Low-Incidence

PSAs

Implementation Science Urban &RuralOSE Asst.

Director Transition ETC.10

VIS

ION

11

20: Clear and Consistent and pervasive communication throughout the system to promote priorities

Deepest DriverV

ISIO

N

12