Standard No 24 Faculty and Staff - Quantitative Factors

Page 1 of 7

Standard No. 24: Faculty and Staff—Quantitative Factors: The college or school must have a sufficient number of qualified full-time faculty and staff to effectively deliver and evaluate the professional degree program, while providing adequate time for faculty development, research and other scholarly activities, service, and pharmacy practice.

1) Documentation and Data:

Use a check to indicate the information provided by the college or school and used to self-assess this standard:

Required Documentation and Data:

List of full time staff within each department/division and their areas of responsibility (e.g. administrative support, telecommunication, audiovisual, and computer personnel) [NOTE: SAME REPORT FOR STANDARD 7 & 24] (Appendix 7C)

List of part time paid faculty (< 0.5FTE) and staff with (as applicable) academic title, credentials, department/division, and areas of responsibility

ACPE Faculty Resource Report [Download template from http://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/FacultyResourceReportJuly2008.xls] (Appendix 24B)

List of faculty turnover for the last 5 years, by department/division, with reasons for leaving and timing of replacements (Appendix 24C)

List of staff turnover for the last 5 years, by department/division, with reasons for leaving and timing of replacements (Appendix 24D)

Required Documentation for On-Site Review:

List of voluntary faculty, with academic title/status and practice site; specify IPPE and/or APPE

Data Views and Standardized Tables:

It is optional for the college or school to provide brief comments about each chart or table (see Directions).

Optional Documentation and Data:

Other documentation or data that provides supporting evidence of compliance with the standard.

Page 2 of 7

2) College or School’s Self-Assessment: Use the checklist below to self-assess the program on the requirements of the standard and accompanying guidelines:

S N.I. U

The college or school has a sufficient number of qualified full-time faculty to effectively deliver and evaluate the professional degree program, while providing adequate time to ensure that the following are achieved:

effective organization and delivery of the curriculum through classroom, small group, laboratory, practice simulation, service learning, and oversight and provision of experiential education

faculty mentoring

student advising and mentoring

research and other scholarly activities

faculty development as educators and scholars

professional/community service and pharmacy practice (where indicated by their position)

participation in college or school and university committees

assessment and evaluation activities

The college or school has a sufficient number of qualified full-time staff to effectively support the delivery and evaluation of the professional degree program.

Faculty receive adequate support staff resources.

The college or school periodically conducts faculty workload and needs assessments, at appropriate intervals.

3) College or School’s Comments on the Standard: The college or school’s descriptive text and supporting evidence should specifically address the following. Use a check to indicate that the topic has been adequately addressed. Use the text box provided to describe: areas of the program that are noteworthy, innovative, or exceed the expectation of the standard; the college or school's self-assessment of its issues and its plans for addressing them, with relevant timelines; findings that highlight areas of concern along with actions or recommendations to address them; and additional actions or strategies to further advance the quality of the program. For plans that have already been initiated to address an issue, the college or school should provide evidence that the plan is working. Wherever possible and applicable, survey data should be broken down by demographic and/or branch/campus/pathway groupings, and comments provided on any notable findings.

A description of the process and interval for conducting faculty workload and needs assessments

An analysis of teaching load of faculty members, including commitments outside the professional degree program

The rational for hiring any part-time faculty, and the anticipated duration of their contract

Evidence of faculty and staff capacity planning and succession planning

A discussion of the college or school’s student-to-faculty ratio and how the ratio ties in with the college or school’s mission and goals for the program

How the college or school is applying the guidelines for this standard in order to comply with the intent and expectation of the standard

Any other notable achievements, innovations or quality improvements

Interpretation of the data from the applicable AACP standardized survey questions, especially notable differences from national or peer group norms.

Page 3 of 7

Faculty and Staff

There are 33 full-time faculty (Appendix 24A) and 11 part-time faculty between Pharmaceutical

Sciences and Pharmacy Practice departments. Currently, 54.4% of full-time faculty are assistant

professors. This compares to 64% in 2005-06. There were 5 full professors and 5 associate

professors in 2005-06, compared to 7 full professors and 4 associate professors currently. Since

the last accreditation visit, 4 faculty were promoted from assistant to associate professor while 5

faculty were promoted from associate to full professor.

The College is fortunate to have many excellent practitioners in the local area that are available to

teach part-time in appropriate areas when needed. Part-time faculty members (Table 24-1) are

usually hired on a temporary basis to fill an open faculty position while the replacement search is in

progress. As an example, Pharmaceutical Sciences has an open faculty position in

pharmacokinetics and is currently conducting a search to fill this position. Dr. Robert Nelson, a

part-time instructor, is teaching the pharmacokinetics course until the open position is filled. Part-

time faculty members have also been used when special expertise is needed. For example, Dr.

Thomas Christensen is a pharmacy attorney hired to teach Pharmacy Law.

Table 24-1 Part-time Faculty Members

Name Title Department Course Lecture Hours

Aaron Anderson, RPh Lecturer Pharmaceutical Sciences

PSCI 415, Pharmacodynamics V PSCI 416, Pharmacodynamics VI

22 20

Robert Biberdorf, MS, RPH

Assistant Professor

Pharmacy Practice PHRM 475, Pharmacy Management PHRM 534, Rheumatology, Endocrine PHRM 560, Special Topics

1.5 15 10

Thomas Christensen, PHD, JD, RPh

Lecturer Pharmacy Practice PHRM 572, Pharmacy Law 30

Richard Clarens, Pharm.D.

Lecturer Pharmacy Practice PHRM 532, Infectious Disease PHRM 538, CV & Pulmonary Disease

2.5 12

Brien Nelson, RPh Lecturer Pharmaceutical Sciences

PSCI 545, Clinical Toxicology PSCI 411, Pharmacodynamics I

30 4

Robert Nelson, Pharm.D.

Lecturer Pharmaceutical Sciences / Pharmacy Practice

PHRM 532, Infectious Disease PSCI 470/670, Pharmacokinetics

18 40

Betty Patterson, PHD, RPh

IPPE Mentor

Pharmacy Practice PHRM 555, IPPE III -

Kenneth Strandberg, MBA, RPh

Lecturer Pharmacy Practice PHRM 463, Hospital Pharmacy 30

Joan Viets, Pharm.D. IPPE Mentor


Ross Wilhelm, Pharm.D.

Assistant Professor

Pharmacy Practice

PHRM 170, Common Medications PHRM 300, Nursing Pharmacology PHRM 450, Self Care PHRM 451, Pharmaceutical Care III

18 22 20 15

Brianne Wilcox, Pharm.D.

IPPE Mentor


Page 4 of 7

Faculty Workload

Pharmaceutical Sciences faculty members teach an average of 50-55 hours per year in both the

professional and graduate program, not counting the hours spent advising graduate students.

Faculty in Pharmacy Practice teach an average of 40 didactic hours in the professional program, in

addition to their supervision of students in laboratory or practice sites. The teaching responsibilities

are determined based on the courses which need to be taught in the professional program and the

Pharmaceutical Sciences graduate program.

Faculty members in the Pharmaceutical Sciences department actively engage in nationally

competitive research. Several serve as ad hoc members of NIH Study Sections and NSF proposal

review panels. The pharmacy program is ranked 9th nationally by the NIH based on the percent of

PHD’s who have NIH funding. A Center for Biopharmaceutical Research and Production (with

emphasis on vaccine development) has been established through the state-supported Centers of

Excellence program to increase research and development in the local area. Pharmacy Practice

faculty members are also involved in scholarship and have increased their productivity in this area

with 30 peer-reviewed publications in 2010-11.

Usually, each faculty member participates in at least one committee at the department/college level

and one at the university level. The faculty members also advise and mentor the professional and

pre-professional students. Faculty workload and needs assessments are reviewed annually during

the faculty performance review. Changes to the teaching load, along with faculty development

plans, are made as needed at that time.

Student-Faculty Ratio

The College accepts 85 students per year into the professional pharmacy program and the total

number of P1-P4 students at any one time ranges from 340 to 347. Therefore, the student-faculty

ratio ranges from 10.3 - 10.5 to 1, indicating more faculty are needed to support the professional

program to attain our strategic plan goal of 8:1. Pharmacy Practice needs to fill a vacancy in

social/administrative pharmacy and desires to eventually add another faculty member in

ambulatory care to help with introductory pharmacy practice experiences. Addition of faculty in

Pharmacy Practice for the new Master of Public Health (MPH) program will soon provide additional

support to the Pharm.D. program, as well. As previously mentioned, Pharmaceutical Sciences has

an open position in pharmacokinetics and a search is underway to fill this vacancy. It is anticipated

that the new faculty member will join the department on or before August 1, 2012.

Page 5 of 7

Succession Planning

Faculty members discuss different strategies to fill vacant faculty positions. These discussions are

based on the need to maintain the adequate number of faculty needed to teach the courses

effectively. Search committees are formed and include faculty members from Pharmaceutical

Sciences, Pharmacy Practice, students, staff, and external members when appropriate. The vice

president for Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach or the director of Human Resources/Payroll,

depending on the type of position, are considered ex officio members of each search committee

and are available to assist the committee in fulfilling its responsibilities.

Generally, a national search is conducted for all full time faculty positions. Prior to posting the

position, the search committee chair is required to attend search training available through the

offices of the provost/vice president for Academic Affairs and Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach

or via the online training module available on BlackBoard (ref Section 304 NDSU Policy Manual).

The search committee is involved in recruiting, screening and interviewing applicants, with

particular responsibility for affirmative action efforts to solicit and include applicants from under-

represented and protected groups (ref Section 103 NDSU Policy Manual). North Dakota State

University is fully committed to equal opportunity in employment decisions and educational

programs and activities, in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and including

appropriate affirmative action efforts (ref NDSU Policy 100). Recommendations for the finalist(s)

occur on the basis of the credentials of the applicant, consensus of the search committee and

faculty input. The two departments also strive to maintain a balance of assistant professors,

associate professors and professors. Selection from the group of finalists is the responsibility of the

dean (ref Sec 103 NDSU Policy Manual).

The College enjoys a relatively stable number of faculty which may be attributed to annual reviews

with department chairs, generous travel for faculty development, collegiality among faculty, seed

grants for pharmacy practice faculty research and a positive administrative climate (Appendix 24B

and 24C). During the annual review process, faculty members are asked to evaluate their short-

term and long-term goals, discuss their strengths and weaknesses and are given feedback from

their respective chair. This process has led to positive staff retention and very little turnover in the

College. Thus, the hiring process is effective in addressing a well-balanced faculty of educators,

clinicians and scientists. Within the last fiscal year, there have been no resignations, two new

assistant professors, one academic assistant, one research assistant/professor and one professor

added to the College.

Page 6 of 7

Interpretations of AACP Survey Results

The majority of the faculty members (more than 80%) agree or strongly agree that their allocation

of efforts are clearly stated, they receive adequate support staff resources and the program’s

resources can accommodate present student enrollment. More than 70% of faculty members

agree or strongly agree that the College has a sufficient number of qualified faculty. It is anticipated

that with the hiring of the pharmacokinetics faculty (Pharmaceutical Sciences) and the

social/administrative pharmacy (Pharmacy Practice), the concern expressed by 28% of the

responders will be addressed. More than 80% of the respondents strongly agreed or agreed that

their time spent in teaching and research is adequate. A majority of faculty members (78%)

indicated that the time spent in service is appropriate. For most of these questions, the responses

from the College are better (or comparable) than those from the peer institutions. An overwhelming

majority of students (98%) agree or strongly agree that the preceptors provided them with

individualized instruction, guidance and evaluation that met their needs as professional students.

These results are similar to those from peer institutions. AACP survey results are found in

Appendix 24D.

4) College or School’s Final Self-Evaluation: Self-assess how well the program is in compliance with the standard by putting a check in the appropriate box :

Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant

No factors exist that compromise current compliance; no factors exist that, if not addressed, may compromise future compliance.

• No factors exist that compromise current compliance; factors exist that, if not addressed, may compromise future compliance /or

• Factors exist that compromisecurrent compliance; an appropriate plan exists to address the factors that compromise compliance; the plan has been fully implemented; sufficient evidence already exists that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into full compliance.

Factors exist that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan exists to address the factors that compromise compliance and it has been initiated; the plan has not been fully implemented and/or there is not yet sufficient evidence that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into compliance.

• Factors exist that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan to address the factors that compromise compliance does not exist or has not yet been initiated /or

• Adequate information was not provided to assess compliance

Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant

Page 7 of 7

5) Recommended Monitoring: If applicable, briefly describe issues or elements of the standard that may require further monitoring.

Currently, the College’s faculty-student ratio is not ideal. Faculty positions are open for

pharmacokinetics and social/behavior/administrative pharmacy. In addition, the new MPH

degree offering will place additional demands on faculty if not monitored closely.

The Pharmaceutical Sciences department is working with the director of CBRP to develop an

academic appointment model for the scientists at CBRP. This is contingent upon proper

academic credentials of the employee. The two units are in the process of exploring other joint

hiring options, including tenure-track appointments in the Pharmaceutical Sciences department.

Appendices

Appendix 24A: Full Time Faculty

Appendix 24B: ACPE Faculty Resource Report

Appendix 24C: Faculty & Staff Turnover Last 5 Years

Appendix 24D: AACP Survey Data

Appendix 7C: Full Time Staff

Page 1 of 1

Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty

Member Degree, Year, Institution Rank

Years in rank

Bin Guo Ph.D., 1999, State University of New York at Buffalo Associate Professor 2

Benedict Law Ph.D., 2002, University of Manchester, England Assistant Professor 4

Stephen O’Rourke Ph.D., 1985, University of Wisconsin, Madison Professor 1

Estelle Leclerc Ph.D., 1998, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland

Assistant Professor 2

Sanku Mallik Ph,D,, 1992, Case Western Reserve University Professor 2

Steven Y. Qian Ph.D., 1999, University of Iowa Assistant Professor 5

Craig Schnell Ph.D., 1969, Purdue University Former Provost/VPAA, Professor, *

2

Jadish Singh Ph.D., 1982, Benaras Hindu University, India Professor, and Chair 9

Chengwen Sun Ph.D., 1996, Norman Bethune University of Medical Sciences

Assistant Professor 4

Stefan W. Vetter Ph.D., 1998, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Research Assistant Lecturer

1

Erxi Wu Ph.D., 1998, Sheffield University, England Assistant Professor 3

Yagna Jarajapu Ph.D., 2002,, Glasgow Caledonian University, England Assistant Professor 1

Pharmacy Practice Faculty Member

Degree, Year, Institution Rank Years

in rank

Christian B. Albano Ph.D., 2005, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 3

Wendy Brown Pharm.D., 2001, North Dakota State University Associate Professor 1

Mark Dewey Pharm.D., 1999, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 8

Amy Drummond Pharm.D., 1996, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 10

Heidi Eukel Pharm.D., 2008, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 2

Jeanne Frenzel Pharm.D., 2003, North Dakota State University Associate Professor 1

Alicia Fitz Pharm.D., 1997, University of Minnesota Assistant Professor 5

Rebecca L. Focken Pharm.D., 2005, University of Minnesota Director, IPPE, Assistant Professor

4

Michael Kelsch Pharm.D., 1999, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 11

Donald Miller Pharm. D., 1978, University of Michigan Professor, and Chair 12

Kenton Omvig Pharm.D., 1993, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 19

Anne Ottney Pharm.D., 2007, University of Wyoming-Laramie Assistant Professor 3

Wanda Roden B.S., 1975, North Dakota State University Director of APPE Experiential Programs

8

Tara Schmitz Pharm.D., 1995, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 6

David M. Scott Ph.D., 1987, University of Minnesota Professor 2

Elizabeth Skoy Pharm.D., 2007, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 2

Robert K. Sylvester Pharm.D., 1976, University of Minnesota Professor 1

Amy Werremeyer Pharm.D., 2005, North Dakota State University Assistant Professor 8

Administration Degree, Year, Institution Rank Years

in rank

Charles Peterson Pharm.D., 1977, University of Minnesota Dean and Professor 15

Cynthia A. Naughton

Pharm.D., 1995, North Dakota State University Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Assessment, Associate Professor

2

Daniel Friesner Ph.D., 2000, Washington State University Associate Dean for Student Affairs & Faculty Dev., Professor

1

Appendix 24 A: Full Time Faculty

Page 1 of 2

Appendix 24B: Faculty Resource Report

Section A – FTE Totals

APPROVED positions (total

FTE)

FILLED positions (total

FTE)

VACANT positions (total

FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)

Pharmaceutical Sciences:

Opening figure (July 1) 13 11 2 14 11 3 14 13 1

Additional (new) positions APPROVED during the year

1 0 0

Positions lost (DISCONTINUED) during the year

0 0 0

Number of persons hired (new positions and replacements)

0 2 0

Number of persons who resigned during the year

0 0 0

Number of persons who retired during the year

0 0 0

Number of persons who were lost for other reasons during the year

0 0 0

Closing figure (June 30) 14 11 3 14 13 1 14 13 1

Pharmacy Practice:

Opening figure (July 1) 19.8 19.8 0 19.8 18.8 1 19.8 18.8 1


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


1 0 0

Closing figure (June 30) 19.8 18.8 1 19.8 18.8 1 19.8 18.8 1

Other Department (specify):



0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


Other Department (specify):



0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0

PAST ACADEMIC YEAR CURRENT ACADEMIC YEAR NEXT ACADEMIC YEAR

Page 2 of 2

Section A – FTE Totals continued


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)


FTE)

Administration:



0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


Summary (total of above boxes):

Opening figure (July 1) 35.8 33.8 2 36.8 32.8 4 36.8 34.8 2


1 0 0


0 0 0


0 2 0


0 0 0


0 0 0


1 0 0

Closing figure (June 30) 36.8 32.8 4 36.8 34.8 2 36.8 34.8 2


Section B – Experiential Program PRECEPTORS

Percentage of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs) precepted by Full-Time Faculty

Percentage of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs) precepted by contract/volunteer preceptors

92.9 93.4 93.2

PAST ACADEMIC YEAR 05-06 CURRENT ACADEMIC YEAR NEXT ACADEMIC YEAR

7.1 6.6 6.8

Section C – Students Enrolled TOTAL STUDENT FTE

(professional years only) P1 P1 P1

P2 P2 P2

P3 P3 P3

P4 P4 P4

Non-Trad Non-Trad Non-Trad

Total Total Total 346

85

89

84

88

346

86

88

351

89

84

87

90


85

88

Page 1 of 1

Appendix 24C: Faculty and Staff Turnover Last 5 Years

Faculty Resignations

Action/Reason Replacement/Date

Shamima Khan June 2007

Resignation/ accepted another academic position Daniel Friesner July 2008

Vacant (Hinderliter) July 2006

Resignaton/accepted another academic position Benedict Law Aug 2007

Justin Welch Sept 2007

Resignation/accepted VA hospital position Heidi Eukel July 2009

Larry Patnaude October 2008

Resignation/accepted non-academic position Elizabeth Skoy June 2009

Stefan Balaz May 2009

Resignation/accepted another academic position Still vacant

Jonathan Sheng May 2009

Resignation/accepted another academic position Yagna Jarajapu August 2011

Satadal Chaterjee June 2009

Resignation/ not stated Estelle Leclerc, Aug 2009

Kimberly Halbur April 2010

Resignation/accepted another academic position Daniel Friesner July 2011

Daniel Friesner July 2011

Accepted Associate Dean position in the College In progress

New Faculty Positions Alicia Fitz Oct 2006

Student Health Services Pharmacy

Rebecca Focken July 2007

IPPE Coordinator

Christian Albano July 2008

Pathophysiology

Anne Ottney July 2008

To replace Naughton at FHCP

Erix Wu Dec 2008

Proteomics

Stefan Vetter Jan 2010

Research Assistant Professor

Satish Chandran May 2010

Professor, Pharmaceutical Sciences; Director, Center for Biopharmaceutical Research and Production

List of staff turnover for the last 5 years, by department/division, with reasons for leaving and timing of replacements:

Staff Resignations Tammy Irion July 2007

Not stated in resignation June Perrizo May 2007

Cynthia Hanson Nov 2007

Not stated in resignation Sara Wald Jan 2008

June Perrizo Mar 2008

To accept a full-time position Julie Roberts March 2008

Julie Roberts May 2009

Not stated in resignation Kristi Weston June 2009

Barb Welk Nov 2009

Not stated in resignation Nancy Nessa March 2009

Rebecca Heinsen Nov 2010

To pursue other interests Melissa Eslinger March 2011

Paul Connelley April 2011

Not stated in resignation Mark Lofgren June 2011

Page 1 of 10

Graduating Student Survey

Question: 69. Overall, preceptors provided me with individualized instruction, guidance and evaluation

that met my needs as a Doctor of Pharmacy student.

Appendix 24D: AACP Surveys

Page 2 of 10

Faculty Survey Name

Question: 14. My allocation of effort has been clearly stated.


Page 3 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 20. I receive adequate support staff resources.


Page 4 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 27. The college/school has a sufficient number of qualified faculty.


Page 5 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 28. The program's resources can accommodate present student enrollment.


Page 6 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 62. In my opinion, the proportion of my time spent on teaching is appropriate.


Page 7 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 63. In my opinion, the proportion of my time spent on research is appropriate.


Page 8 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 64. In my opinion, the proportion of my time spent on service is appropriate.


Page 9 of 10

Faculty Survey

Question: 65. In my opinion, the proportion of my time spent on clinical service is appropriate.


Page 10 of 10

APPENDIX 7C: COLLEGE SUPPORT STAFF

Name/Title Responsibilities Supervisor

DEAN’S OFFICE

Julie Bartelson Assistant to the Dean

Budget and payroll management for the college, college contact for other campus entities,

Charles D. Peterson, Dean

Dana Davis Recruitment Coordinator

Coordinate recruitment efforts for all college departments;

Daniel Friesner, Associate Dean for Student Affairs & Faculty Development

Melissa Eslinger Academic Assistant

Administrative support for associate deans, web page support for all college departments

Cynthia Naughton, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs & Assessment

Liz Frannea Academic Assistant

Administrative & Academic support for associate deans for academic affairs & student affairs, Pharm. D. admissions specialist

Daniel Friesner, Associate Dean for Student Affairs & Faculty Development

Diana Kowalski Library Associate

Library support for the Life Sciences Library

Michele Reid, Dean of Libraries

Lori Peterson Dean’s Office Assistant

Administrative support for the dean , accounting assistant to the assistant to the dean, general building operations

Julie Bartelson, Assistant to the Dean

Chris Simon Information Systems Specialist

Technology support services for all college departments

Julie Bartelson, Assistant to the Dean

Sara Wald Advancement Director

Coordinates alumni contacts, events, and fund raising efforts for the college.


Kristi Weston Administrative support for the advancement director


PHARMACY PRACTICE

Carol Jore Academic Assistant

Administrative support for the department chair and faculty

Donald Miller, Chair

Mark Lundgren Experiential Programs Assistant

Administrative support Wanda Roden, APPE Director

Nancy Nessa Experiential Programs Assistant

Administrative support Rebecca Focken, IPPE Director

Rebecca Deitch SHS Pharmacist

Pharmacist coverage when faculty member/pharmacist is in class

Alicia Fitz, Assistant Professor, Pharmacy Practice

PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES

Janet Krom Administrative Assistant

Administrative support for department chair and faculty

Jagdish Singh, Chair

Jean Trautmann Academic Assistant

Administrative support for department graduate students

Janet Krom, Administrative Assistant

Documents

Standard No 24 Faculty and Staff - Quantitative Factors