Upload
treva
View
28
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Spotlight on Districts and Campuses. Bonham Independent School District February 25, 2011. Background. Too many students being pulled out of classroom for reading intervention A need to bridge the gap between campuses. Number of Students Pulled for Reading Intervention. Paradigm Shift. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Spotlight on Districts Spotlight on Districts and Campusesand Campuses
Bonham Independent School District
February 25, 2011
BackgroundBackground
Too many students being pulled out of classroom for reading intervention
A need to bridge the gap between campuses
Number of Students Pulled for Number of Students Pulled for Reading InterventionReading Intervention
Grade Level
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
Kinder 150 Total
76 31 16 13
1st 140 Total
76 33 21 14
2nd 160 Total
9257 RI
35 LS
6737 RI
30 LS
35 RI
No LS
16
3rd
160 Total
7042 RI
28 LS
54 27 RI
27 LS
44 30 RI
14 LS
2515 RI
10 LS
Paradigm ShiftParadigm Shift
Saxon Phonics (whole group)
Guided Reading (small group, differentiated instruction)
DIBELS (progress monitoring, data-driven instruction)
A Need For RTIA Need For RTI
Use data to determine student needsEmpower teachers to make instructional
decisions using dataProvide additional support to teachers if
classroom instruction is not workingMonitor students who were not being pulled
for interventionAccountability
The Solution: An Enhanced The Solution: An Enhanced RTI ProcessRTI Process
Assistant Principal/ RTI Coordinator: Created forms to document interventions/
instruction Scheduled meetings with teachers to discuss
instructional strategies and set goals Set follow up meetings to discuss student
progress and next steps
The Solution: An Enhanced The Solution: An Enhanced RTI ProcessRTI Process
Classroom Teachers: Implemented research based interventions Monitored student progress Adjusted instruction according to student’s
response to intervention
The Solution: An Enhanced The Solution: An Enhanced RTI ProcessRTI Process
Reading Intervention Team: Used DIBELS data to determine what
students would receive pull-out intervention Provided specific, targeted interventions
based on student data Progress monitored students weekly
Kindergarten DataKindergarten Data
Kindergarten DataKindergarten Data
11stst Grade Data Grade Data
What We LearnedWhat We LearnedRTI: Is about instruction;Supports general education school
improvement goals;Focuses primarily on effective instruction to
enhance student growth;Provides intervention immediately upon
student need
What We LearnedWhat We Learned
At the heart of the RTI process in an effective instructional leader who ensures that all students receive high-quality, differentiated instruction that gives all students the opportunity to succeed.
What We LearnedWhat We Learned
RTI is about problem-solving.Problem-solving means going beyond
fulfilling procedural requirements and checklists to doing what it takes to resolve students’ learning problems.
What We LearnedWhat We Learned
Guiding Principles of RTI1. Scientific, research-based instruction and
interventions
2. Assessment of the effects of instruction
3. Responsive teaching and differentiation
4. Regular monitoring of instruction and intervention delivery
Using What We Learned by Using What We Learned by Following the Guiding Principles Following the Guiding Principles
of RTIof RTI
1. Implement scientific, research-based instruction and interventions
Florida Center for Reading Research; Reading Mastery; Voyager; Waterford; Success Maker
Using What We Learned by Using What We Learned by Following the Guiding Principles Following the Guiding Principles
of RTIof RTI
2. Assess the effects of instruction (i.e., child response data based on frequent progress monitoring)
DIBELS progress monitoring probes; DRA
Using What We Learned by Using What We Learned by Following the Guiding Principles Following the Guiding Principles
of RTIof RTI
3.Responsive teaching and differentiation/ Data-based decision making (i.e., using the child response data as the basis for decision making and instructional planning)
RTI meetings; RTI notebooks
Using What We Learned by Using What We Learned by Following the Guiding Principles Following the Guiding Principles
of RTIof RTI
4. Regular monitoring of instruction and intervention delivery
Observations and feedback by administrators
Guiding Principles of RTIGuiding Principles of RTI
Each principle is part of an interrelated process which should be applied to every student.
Instructional practices are evaluated and adjusted based on results of reliable, valid, and sensitive indicators of important student outcomes.
If any piece is missing, the process breaks down.
How To Ensure That The How To Ensure That The Process Is WorkingProcess Is Working
Regular monitoring and accountability through observations and checklists by an independent observer who is well-versed in best teaching practices and the 5 components of reading (i.e., administrators)
ChallengesChallenges
Time/Scheduling Core Instruction (Tier I) Paradigm Shifts Changing Roles Funding Raising Expectations Building Capacity Teacher Training Professional Development Research-based intervention resources
Next StepsNext Steps
1. Improve Tier I (core instruction) Professional Development Increase observations and feedback2. More fluidity within Tiers3. Enhance RTI process for Math
Questions???Questions???
Contact InformationContact Information
Kelly Trompler – Curriculum [email protected] 903-583-5526 Mary Lou Fox – [email protected] 903-640-4090Julie Burnett – Instructional [email protected] 903-640-4090Karli Fowler – Reading [email protected] 903-640-4090
ResourcesResources DIBELSwww.dibels.uoregon.edu Reading Masterywww.mheonline.com Florida Center for Reading Researchwww.fcrr.org Voyagerwww.voyagerlearning.com/passport/curriculum.jsp Waterfordwww.waterfordearlylearning.org/overview/
complete_early_reading_math_and_science.html Success Makerwww.pearsonschool.com/index.cfm?locator=PSZk99
Teachers Count!Teachers Count!
“The impact of the teacher is the single most powerful variable in explaining student reading achievement” (Nye et al., 2004).