11
I.Spontaneous Order Theories Unlike power theories (top-down), these are bottom-up (predictability or coop emerges as by-product of individual actions). Hayek: All you need to know about Hayek comes from my lecture (you didn’t have to read the article). Hayek discusses two types of order (focusing on predictability). 1) Kosmos (spontaneous) Eg, market, society. Superior for efficiency, complexity. 2) Taxis (man-made). Eg, orgs, govt. Hayek against gov’t interference in market, but also argues norms required to make spontaneous order beneficial (ie,

Spontaneous Order Theories

  • Upload
    tassos

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Spontaneous Order Theories Unlike power theories (top-down), these are bottom-up (predictability or coop emerges as by-product of individual actions). Hayek: All you need to know about Hayek comes from my lecture (you didn’t have to read the article). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Spontaneous Order Theories

I. Spontaneous Order Theories

Unlike power theories (top-down), these are bottom-up (predictability or coop emerges as by-product of individual actions).

Hayek: All you need to know about Hayek comes from my lecture (you didn’t have to read the article).

Hayek discusses two types of order (focusing on predictability).1) Kosmos (spontaneous) Eg, market, society. Superior for

efficiency, complexity. 2) Taxis (man-made). Eg, orgs, govt. Hayek against gov’t

interference in market, but also argues norms required to make spontaneous order beneficial (ie, cooperative).

Page 2: Spontaneous Order Theories

Axelrod I: How does cooperation emerge among self-interested individuals?

Prisoner’s Dilemma: • Models situation in which individual

incentives motivate action not in best interest of the group, all worse off than if cooperated (suboptimal equilibrium). – b/c defection always best individual strategy

• Emergence of cooperation requires iterated games.

Page 3: Spontaneous Order Theories

Axelrod-2: Live & let live strat. in trench warfare

• Key point: spontaneous coop can develop even with opposing interests

• Small immobile units = iterated PD game.

• Lessons of this study for PD game:– Truce ↑ value of “mutual cooperation”

– ↑ retaliation for violation.

Page 4: Spontaneous Order Theories

Smith & Critiques

• Adam Smith: Propensity to barter + desire for goods/$ DoL increased productivity (↑ wealth) social order b/c rising tide lifts all boats.

• Assumes positive-sum resources and rational egoism

Critique of Spontaneous Order Theories• Polanyi (historical): laissez faire capitalism regulation• Unrealistic assumptions, esp. PD• What about social structure?

Page 5: Spontaneous Order Theories

II. Groups & Networks Theories

Simmel: Two types of social organization

• Concentric– organic/“by birth” – Social order by reinforcing conformity– High social control

FamilyVillageClan

Page 6: Spontaneous Order Theories

Simmel, con’t

• Juxtaposed– rational criteria; – Modern

(heterogeneous) society

individuality, ÷s loyalty, group isolation

Page 7: Spontaneous Order Theories

• Talks about why people join groups (need each other for safety & survival)

• Anarchy cohesion/trust– No state & pastoralism formation of tribes for

defense.

• Also talks about ties across groups. Ritualized betrayal fluid/permeable associations. Prevents one getting too strong; groups self-police.

Gellner

Page 8: Spontaneous Order Theories

Tocqueville

• Equality feared as source of conflict

• In America, political freedom prevents conflict b/c voluntary assoc help people internalize coop values.

• Thinks centralized gov’t makes men less self-sufficient, less bonded together

Page 9: Spontaneous Order Theories

Hechter’s Theory of Group Solidarity

• Assumes instrumental rationality: we join groups for net benefit, for goods we can’t produce efficiently ourselves

• Solidarity varies w/ visibility (for social control) & dependence.

Page 10: Spontaneous Order Theories

Hechter, Friedman & Kanazawa

• Group Membership means benefits, but also obligations (on time, conformity to group norms, contributions, etc.)

• State “free-rides” on local social order, esp. that produced by deviant groups.

• State will tolerate deviant groups unless they threaten state power, or organized grps.

Page 11: Spontaneous Order Theories

Final Exam

• 25 multiple choice questions worth 4pts/ea• Exam focused on post-midterm material, but asks some

questions comparing with earlier theories (Hobbes and Durkheim), and the theory groups (e.g., comparing group/network theories with theories from 1st part of course).

• 2-4 questions per theorist.• Remember, take your time, cross off answers you know

are incorrect, write yourself notes (diagram) for complicated/multi-part questions.

• Bring scantron; will need to leave all personal possessions at front of room.