Upload
aggie
View
50
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
STAR. Spin Physics Progress with the STAR Detector at RHIC. Spin related hardware improvements to STAR Important constraints on D G along the way – jets and p 0 s Sivers Functions from jets at mid-rapidity. J. Sowinski. for the. Collaboration. Detector. Lum. Monitor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Spin Physics Progress with the STAR Detector at RHIC
• Spin related hardware improvements to STAR• Important constraints on G along the way – jets and 0s• Sivers Functions from jets at mid-rapidity
J. Sowinskifor the
STARSTAR
Collaboration
Detector
=0
Forward Pion Detector
Endcap EM Calorimeter
Beam-Beam Counters
Time Projection Chamber-1.6<η< 1.6
Barrel EM Calorimeter
-1<η< 1
1<η< 2-4.1<η< -3.3
2.2<|η|< 5
Solenoidal MagneticField 5kG
=2= -1
Tracking
Lum. Monitor Local Polarim.
200320042005
Triggering
Triggering
= - ln(tan(/2)
STARSTAR
See talk by J. Kiryluk
• Pb Scintillator sampling calorimeter – 21 rad. lengths• 720 Towers give EM energy• Shower Max. Detector for 0/ discrimination• Pre- and post-shower det’s for e/h discrimination• 9,792 channels read out• High Tower and Jet Patch triggers
Endcap ElectroMagnetic Calorimeter
2003 1/3 Towers2004 All
Towers . 1/3 SMD
2005 Fully Instr.
SMD profiles for a 9 GeV 0 candidate
Charged tracks matched to fired EEMC towers for a 62 GeV Au+Au event. 2004 DataMIPs ~ 0.3GeV
Online tower-only 0 reconstruction, 200 GeV Au+Au
All eventsMixed events
Difference
[200 GeV p+p (2003)]U V
8 cm
7 cm
Inv. Mass
Scinti. + Pb sandwich sampling EMC• 4800 projective towers (2in, -1< <1)• Shower Max Detector-gas detector-18K strips• Pre Shower Detector (first 2 layers)• High tower trigger & 1x1 (η, φ) jet trigger
Barrel ElectroMagnetic Calorimeter
pT>3GeV
24 modules FY0260 modules FY0390 modules FY04All modules (plan all elect.)FY05
One module = 40 towers
#120 – the last one!August 2004
Sz = ½ = ½ + G + Lzq + Lz
g
First Moments at Q02=1 GeV2:
(MS) = 0.19 ± 0.05 ± 0.04
(AB) = 0.38
G(AB) = 0.99
(just one example of many)
+ 0.03 + 0.03 + 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.05
+ 1.17 + 0.42 + 1.43 0.31 0.22 0.45
—
SMC Analysis, PRD 58, 112002 (1998)
The Proton Spin Structure - G
Quark pol. well known from DISBut only a small fraction of p helicity
Gluon polarization poorly determined
Orb. Ang. Mom.unknown
G is accessible and a high priority at RHIC and STAR!
STARSTAR
A ~ P P a LL g part LL^
pQCD
MeasureKnow from DIS
“G”
G via partonic scattering from a gluon
• Dominant reaction mechanism
• Experimentally clean reaction mechanism
• Large a• But jet and 0 rates are
sufficient to give significant G const. in 2005 data
Prefer
LL^
-jet coinc. rare
STARSTAR
Heavy flavor rare
Jets and 0s
STARSTARSees and reconstructs jetsLarge solid angle is crucial
But signal is mixture of multiple partonic subprocesses 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
gg qq
qg
Inclusive Jets :LOW. Vogelsang
pT (GeV)
Fra
ctio
n
Leads to small but significant ALL in 2005
(~1/10 of these stats from 2004 currently being processed)
Polarized Proton Operation at RHIC
Year 2002 ~2007
s = 200 GeV
Improving L and Pol.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007• L (s-1cm-2) 0.5x1030 2x1030 3x1030 8x1030
17x1030 48x1030
• Int. L (pb-1) (T/L) 0.3/0.0 0.5/0.4 0.5/0.4 4/7 28 86 • Pol. 0.2 0.3 0.40 0.45 0.65 0.70
Spin flipper
Transverse/LongitudinalSpin running
T/L DivisionTo be decided
Jager, Stratmann, Vogelsang NLO pQCD calculations
hep-ph/0404057~1/3 of the jet energy is EMUse EM cals for triggering jets0s carry ~same physics
-1<<1
EEMC 1<<2
Significant const. on G expected in 2005 data (~1/10 stats. from ’04 being analyzed)(error bar estimates too small pT<6 GeV)
-1<<1 BEMC
• Only STAR can track vs. – EMCs+FPD– Different partonic contributions– Large small x
dab
d
Simulation
EEM/Ejet
pT
frac
tion
STARSTAR Quark – Gluon Compton Scatteringp p Direct Jet
• Compton scattering dominates competing qq g mechanism
• Coinc. – jet relatively clean exp. signature
• E, and jet determine
xq, xg,• Allows extraction of g(x)
^
Simulated full data set
Source: F.H. Heinsius, DIS 2004
SMC:PRD70, 012002(2004) HERMES: PRL 84, 2584 (2000)
xg
Eventually gives best determ. of g(x) for existing experiments.
Will get started in 2005 & 2006but need L of 2007+ and 500 GeV for g(x)
kPS
)k(PS)k(x,ƒΔ
21
)k(x,ƒ)s,k(x,ƒPP
pPq
NqqPq
s
2EX
0πF
D. Boer and W. Vogelsang,Phys.Rev. D 69 (2004) 094025
Analyzing Powers at Mid-RapidityDo processes invoked in forward scattering show up at large angles?
For given parton at some x kT
L=kTR
Jet
Jet
DijetDijet
DijetDijetN
YY
YY
Pol1
A
Measure
STARSTAR
STAR Collab. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 171801
See A. Ogawatalk on fwd 0s
Sivers Function – Initial state correlation between kT and spin
4.1 x 10 -4
Partonic kT from Dijet Analysis
kT = <kT>2 = ET sin ()
ET = 13.0 0.7sys GeV Trigger Jet
0.030.05
= 0.23 0.02
AN8 < pT1,2 < 12 GeV
|η1,2 | < 1
Sivers Effect Prediction
STAR agrees well with World
Data on Partonic kT
D. Boer and W. Vogelsang,Phys.Rev. D 69 (2004) 094025
• Curves are for various gluonic Sivers functions
• Connection to partonic orbital angular momentum
• Suppressed by Sudakov effect
kT distribution
STARSTAR
T. Henry, Quark Matter 2004, J. Phys. G
kT
S
Conclusions (Beginnings;-)• RHIC will provide increasing L and P
• STAR EM calorimeters complete– Triggering– Large solid angle EM coverage– See poster on future upgrades
• Important constraints on G expected in ‘05– 0s– Jets– Direct s – longer term
• Investigations of transverse spin effects
STARSTAR