Speculative Prods. v. Mattson - Complaint

8/11/2019 Speculative Prods. v. Mattson - Complaint

1/51

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

JOHNSON & PHAM, LLPChristopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698

E-mail: [email protected] Q. Pham, SBN: 206697

E-mail: [email protected] Q. Pham, SBN: 276613

E-mail:[email protected]

6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326Woodland Hills, California 91367Telephone: (818) 888-7540Facsimile: (818) 888-7544

Attorneys for PlaintiffSPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN, LLC, dba

SPECK PRODUCTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN,LLC, dba SPECK PRODUCTS, aCalifornia Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PATRICK MATTSON, an Individual;STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES,LLC, a Texas Limited LiabilityCompany; MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, a

business entity of unknown status; and

DOES 1-10, Inclusive,

Defendants

Case No.:


AND DECLARATORY RELIEF:

(1)FEDERAL TRADEMARK

INFRINGEMENT [15 U.S.C.

1114/Lanham Act 43(a)]

(2)FALSE DESIGNATION OF

ORIGIN/UNFAIR

COMPETITION/FALSE OR

MISLEADING ADVERTISING

[15 U.S.C. 1125(a)];

(3)

TRADEMARK DILUTION [15U.S.C. 1125(c)];

(4)UNFAIR BUSINESS

PRACTICES [CALIFORNIA

BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS

CODE 17200];

(5)FEDERAL COPYRIGHT


Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1


2/51


2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

501(a)];

(6)COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT

INFRINGEMENT

[CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE

980 ET SEQ., AND

CALIFORNIA COMMONLAW]

(7)FEDERAL DESIGN PATENT


271]

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

COMES NOW, Plaintiff SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN, LLC, dba

SPECK PRODUCTS (hereinafter Plaintiff and/or SPECK), hereby alleges as

follows:

PARTIES

1. Plaintiff, is now, and was at the time of the filing of this Complaint,

and at all intervening times, a California Limited Liability Company, duly

authorized and licensed to conduct business in the State of California, with its

principal place of business located in San Mateo, California.

2. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant PATRICK

MATTSON (Defendant MATTSON), is now and was at the time of the filing of

this Complaint, an individual doing business in McKinney, Texas. Plaintiff

further alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant MATTSON is the owner

and operator of STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, and the business ofunknown status MD5 TECHNOLOGIES.

3. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant STU

DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC (Defendant STU), is now and was at the

time of the filing of this Complaint, a Texas Limited Liability Company owned by

Defendant MATTSON, doing business at the address of 194 Industrial Boulevard,



3/51


3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

Suite 102, McKinney, Texas.

4. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant MD5

TECHNOLOGIES (Defendant MD5, collectively Defendants), is now and

was at the time of the filing of this Complaint, a business entity of unknown statusthat is a subsidiary of Defendant STU and is also owned by Defendant

MATTSON, doing business at the address of 194 Industrial Boulevard, Suite 102,

McKinney, Texas.

5. Defendants conduct business in the jurisdiction of the United States

District Court for the Central District of California by offering counterfeits goods

for sale in Los Angeles, California, that infringes on Plaintiffs registered

trademarks, copyright, and patent.

6. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate,

associate or otherwise, of Defendants herein named as DOES 1-10, inclusive, are

unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious

names. When the true names and capacities of said Defendants have been

ascertained, Plaintiff will amend this pleading accordingly.

7.

Plaintiff further alleges that Defendants, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

sued herein by fictitious names are jointly, severally and concurrently liable and

responsible with the named Defendant upon the causes of action hereinafter set

forth.

8. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times

mentioned herein Defendants, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, and each of them, were

the agents, servants and employees of every other Defendant and the acts of eachdefendant, as alleged herein, were performed within the course and scope of that

agency, service or employment.

JURISDICTION/VENUE

9. This Court has Federal subject matter jurisdiction over this matter

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) and (b), in that the case arises out of



4/51


4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

claims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition

and dilution under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.), and copyright

infringement under the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. 501(a)); and this Court has

supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) and 1338 (a)(b).10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants since

Defendants have committed the tortious and illegal activities of trademark

infringement, copyright infringement, patent infringement, and unfair competition

in this district and/or Defendants have sufficient minimum contacts with this

district such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Defendants by this Court does

not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Among other

things, Defendants have advertised, offered to sell and have sold products that

infringe the trademarks of Plaintiff to consumers within this judicial district.

Defendants have also offered to sell and actually sold counterfeit products

(described more fully below) using an interactive internet website and knowing or

having reason to know that consumers throughout the United States, including

within this judicial district, would purchase said counterfeit goods from

Defendants, believing that they were authentic goods manufactured and

distributed by Plaintiff or its authorized manufacturers.

11. Additionally, supplemental jurisdiction exists over Defendants

because, on information and belief, Defendants conduct business in California and

in this judicial district, have purposefully directed action to California and this

district, or have otherwise availed themselves of the privileges and protections of

the laws of the State of California, such that this Courts assertion of jurisdictionover Defendants does not offend traditional notions of fair play and due process.

12. Venue is proper, inter alia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because

on information and belief, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise

to the claim occurred in this judicial district, and has caused damages to Plaintiff

in this district. The counterfeit Speck-branded products were purchased from



5/51


5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

California and Defendants purposefully shipped these counterfeit products into

California. Defendants actions within this district directly interfere with and

damage Plaintiffs commercial efforts and endeavors and harms Plaintiffs

goodwill within this venue. Additionally, Plaintiff conducts a substantial businesswithin this venue.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

Plaintiff and its Famous Speck-Branded Products

13. Plaintiff is a privately held U.S. corporation founded in Palo Alto

California in 2001 as a form fit cellular telephone case company. Plaintiff creates

cases for the mobile accessories market.

14.

Plaintiff is one of the leading companies in their industry and has

gained numerous awards and recognition for its innovative products and designs.

15. Plaintiff is one of the worlds leading manufacturers of protective

carrying cases for electronic devices, including but not limited to, portable

electronic listening devices and music players, namely, mp3 players, and for

portable computers, global positioning systems (GPS devices), mobile and cellular

telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants.

16. Plaintiff develops and manufactures protective carrying cases for

products such as the Apple iPhone, Apple iPad, Apple iPod, Apple

MacBook, Notebook bags and sleeves, Smartphones including Blackberry,

HTC, Sharp, Samsung, and Motorola models, TomTom GPS navigation

devices, portable hard drives such as WD My Passport Elite/Essential, and the

Kindle 3.17. Plaintiff is continually striving to discover and develop new,

advanced technologies and designs to meet the needs of the ever-advancing

consumer electronics industry. Plaintiff offers over 250 products and is sold in

over 75 countries worldwide.

/ / /



6/51


6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

18. Plaintiff has spent substantial time, money and effort in developing

consumer recognition and awareness of its marks. Through the extensive use of

the Plaintiffs marks, Plaintiff has built up and developed significant goodwill in

its entire product line. A wide array of newspapers, magazines and televisionnetworks has included advertising of Plaintiffs products, which are immediately

identified by Plaintiffs marks.

19. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of federally-registered and Common

law trademarks. The following is a partial (non-exhaustive) list of the registered

trademarks owned by Plaintiff:

A. SPECK, registered trademark number 3,663,010, registered on

August 4, 2009, for use on or in connection with protective carrying cases for

portable electronic listening devices and music players, namely, mp3 players, and

for portable computers, global positioning systems (GPS devices), mobile and

cellular telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants, in

Class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);

B. [Design Mark], registered trademark number 3,666,082,

registered on August 11, 2009, consisting of an asterisk between parentheses

followed by the word SPECK in stylized letters; for use on or in connection

with protective carrying cases for portable electronic listening devices and music

players, namely, mp3 players, and for portable computers, global positioning

systems (GPS devices), mobile and cellular telephones, portable media players,

and personal digital assistants, in Class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);

C.

[Design Mark], registered trademark number 3,666,072,registered on August 11, 2009, consisting of an asterisk between parentheses; for

use on or in connection with protective carrying cases for portable electronic

listening devices and music players, namely, mp3 players, and for portable

computers, global positioning systems (GPS devices), mobile and cellular

telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants, in Class 9 (U.S.



7/51


7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);

D. CANDYSHELL, registered trademark number 3,817,709,

registered on July 13, 2010, for use on or in connection with protective carrying

cases for mp3 players, mobile and cellular telephones, portable media players, andpersonal digital assistants in Class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);

Attached hereto as Exhibits A-D are true and correct copies of the

certificates of registration for each of the Marks that are federally-registered

(hereinafter Plaintiffs Marks).

20. Plaintiff is also the owner of several international trademarks in the

following locations: Canada, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Malaysia,

European Community, Hong Kong, Intl Registration Madrid Protocol, Taiwan,

Australia, Singapore, Japan, Russian Federation, Thailand, and the Peoples

Republic of China.

21. Plaintiff is also the exclusive owner of federally-registered and

common law copyrights related to and used in connection with the distribution of

its SPECKbranded products, with the following (non-exhaustive) copyright

names, registration numbers, and registration dates: (hereinafter Plaintiffs

Copyright)

A. Fitted Arts Projekt iPhone 3 Core, VA1778313 (Registered

May 27, 2011);

B. PixelSkin iPhone 4 Apple, VA1778433 (Registered May 27,

2011);

C.

GeoMetric iPhone 4 Apple, VA1778429 (Registered May 272011);

D. Fitted iPhone 4 Core, VA 1778411 (Registered May 27,

2011);

E. Fitted iPhone 3 Core, VA1778403 (Registered June 3, 2011)



8/51


8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

F. ToughSkin iPhone 3 Core, VA1778414 (Registered June 3,

2011);

G. SeeThru iPhone 3 Core, VA1778421 (Registered June 3,

2011);H. CandyShell iPhone 3 Core, VA1778406 (Registered June 3,

2011);

I. SeeThru Satin iPhone 4 Core, VA1778423 (Registered June

3, 2011);

J. SeeThru Satin iPhone 3 Core, VA1791177 (Registered May

27, 2011);

K.

SeeThru iPhone 4 Core, VA1778418 (Registered June 3,

2011);

L. Fitted Burton iPhone 4, VA1778646 (Registered June 3,

2011);

M. Fitted iPhone 4 Apple, VA1778642 (Registered June 3,

2011);

N.

ToughSkin iPhone 4 Core, VA1791169 (Registered May 27,

2011);

O. PixelSkin iPhone 4 Core, VA1791185 (Registered May 27,

2011);

P. Fitted Flex iPhone 4 Core, VA1791188 (Registered May 27,

2011);

Q.

SeeThru Satin iPhone 4 Apple, VA1791189 (RegisteredMay 27, 2011);

R. CANDYSHELL FOR iPHONE 4, VA1772394 (Registered

May 6, 2011);

S. Fitted Flex iPhone 4 Apple, VA1791186 (Registered May 27

2011);



9/51


9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

T. ToughSkin iPhone 4 Apple, VA1791180 (Registered May

27, 2011);

U. GeoMetric iPhone 4 Core, VA1791182 (Registered May 27,

2011);V. ToughShell iPhone 4 Core, VA1791178 (Registered May 27

2011);

W. iPhone 5 ShieldView Envelope, VA1879078 (Registered

November 20, 2012);

X. iPhone 5 GemShell Core 2 Wedge 2- Cardstock, VA1879027

(Registered November 20, 2012);

Y.

iPhone 5 CandyShell Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock, VA1879028


Z. iPhone 5 SmartFlex CARD Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,

VA1879029 (Registered November 20, 2012);

AA. iPhone 5 CandyShell FLIP Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,


BB.

iPhone 5 CandyShell GRIP Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,


CC. iPhone 5 CandyShell SATIN Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,


DD. iPhone 5 SmartFlex View Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,


EE.

iPhone 5 FabShell Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock, VA1879074(Registered November 20, 2012);

FF. iPhone 5 PixelSkin Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock, VA1879056


GG. iPhone 5 PixelSkin HD Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock,




10/51


10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

HH. iPhone 5 FabShell Burton Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock,


II. iPhone 5 CandyShell Apple Packaging Milk Carton,

VA1879009 (Registered November 20, 2012);JJ. iPhone 5 GemShell Apple Packaging Milk Carton,


KK. iPhone 5 CandyShell Card Apple Packaging Milk Carton,


LL. iPhone 5 ToughSkin Apple 2 Carton- Cardstock, VA1879035


MM.

iPhone 5 SmartFlex Apple Packaging Milk Carton,

VA1879034 (Registered November 20, 2012); and

NN. iPhone 5 SmartFlex Shine Apple Packaging Milk Carton,


22. Additionally, Plaintiff owns a valid and lawfully issued United States

Design Patent, patent no. US 8,204,561 B2, for its one piece co-formed exterior

hard shell case with an elastomeric liner for mobile electronic devices (Design

Patent). Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the

registration certificate and design drawing.

Defendants Wrongful and Infringing Conduct

23. Defendants use, amongst other things, the Internet auction website

known as www.ebay.com (eBay) to sell and distribute products, including

counterfeit hard goods bearing Plaintiffs Marks, Copyrights, and Design Patentdescribed above, to consumers. At any given time, there are millions of items

listed on eBay.com for purchase by its more than 200 million registered users.

24. Beginning on a date that is currently unknown to Plaintiff and

continuing to the present, Defendants have, without the consent of Plaintiff,

offered to sell and sold within the United States (including within this judicial



11/51


11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

district) goods that were neither made by Plaintiff nor by a manufacturer

authorized by Plaintiff (such goods are hereafter referred to as Counterfeit

Good(s)) using reproductions, counterfeits, copies and/or colorable imitations of

one or more of the subject Marks, Federally-Registered Copyrights, Common-Law Copyrights, and/or Design Patent. On information and belief, Plaintiff

further alleges that Defendants imported said Counterfeit Goods into the United

States, or encouraged others to import said Counterfeit Goods into the United

States, for the purpose of reselling the Counterfeit Goods in the United States.

25. Defendants own and operate web stores on eBay using the seller IDs

drsmartphonesgroup and md5technologies. Through these web stores,

Defendants regularly and systematically advertised, marketed, distributed and sold

products bearing unauthorized Speck registered trademarks.

26. On or about January 29, 2013, Plaintiff purchased a purported

IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL WHITE / BLUE COLOR. NEW, USA

SELLER (Item #300852917445) from Defendants eBay seller ID

drsmartphonesgroup, for a cost of $13.53, shipping inclusive, charged to the

PayPal electronic payment account of Plaintiff. Plaintiffs PayPal electronic

payment receipt clearly identifies Plaintiffs payment was made to STU

Distribution Services (Defendant STU), with a Customer Service URL of

http://www.md5tech.com (Defendant MD5), and PayPal ID

[email protected]. The Counterfeit Good was shipped into Los

Angeles, California within this Courts jurisdiction and was received with

shipping label identifying the seller as Patrick Mattson (Defendant MATTSON)in the return address. A true and correct copy of the PayPal electronic payment

receipt is attached hereto as Exhibit F. A true and correct copy of the shipping

label identifying the seller Defendant MATTSON in the return address is attached

hereto as Exhibit G.

/ / /



12/51


12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

27. The purported IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL WHITE / BLUE

COLOR. NEW, USA SELLER (Item #300852917445) purchased from

Defendants was inspected by Plaintiff to determine authenticity. Plaintiffs

inspection of the purchased item using security measures confirmed that the itemDefendants sold to Plaintiff was in fact a counterfeit Speck-branded product.

28. On or about January 29, 2013, Plaintiff purchased a purported

IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL DEEP VIOLET / AQUA COLOR. NEW,

USA SELLER (Item #271164615042) from Defendants eBay seller ID

md5technologies, for a cost of $18.75, shipping inclusive, charged to the PayPal

electronic payment account of Plaintiff. Plaintiffs PayPal electronic payment

receipt clearly identifies Plaintiffs payment was made to STU Distribution

Services (Defendant STU), with a Customer Service URL of

http://www.md5tech.com (Defendant MD5), and PayPal ID

[email protected]. The Counterfeit Good was shipped into Los

Angeles, California within this Courts jurisdiction and was received with

shipping label identifying the seller as MD5 TECHNOLOGIES (Defendant

MD5) in the return address. A true and correct copy of the PayPal electronic

payment receipt is attached hereto as Exhibit H. A true and correct copy of the

shipping label identifying the seller Defendant MD5 in the return address is

attached hereto as Exhibit I.

29. The purported IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL DEEP VIOLET

/ AQUA COLOR. NEW, USA SELLER (Item #271164615042) purchased from

Defendants was inspected by Plaintiff to determine authenticity. Plaintiffsinspection of the purchased item using security measures confirmed that the item

Defendants sold to Plaintiff was in fact a counterfeit Speck-branded product.

30. Defendants intentionally and knowingly accepted Plaintiffs money

from a financial institution located in the State of California.

/ / /



13/51


13

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

31. Defendants also intentionally and knowingly delivered the

counterfeit products into the State of California.

32. Through such business activities, Defendants purposely derived

benefit from their interstate commerce activities by expressly targetingforeseeable purchasers in the State of California. But for Defendants advertising,

soliciting and selling of counterfeit Speck-branded products, Plaintiff would not

have been able to make a purchase of the subject products.

33. Defendants use images and names confusingly similar or identical to

Plaintiffs Marks to confuse consumers and aid in the promotion and sales of its

unauthorized and counterfeit product. Defendants use of Plaintiffs Marks,

Copyright, and Design Patent include importing, advertising, displaying,

distributing, selling and/or offering to sell Counterfeit Goods.

34. Defendants use began long after Plaintiffs adoption and use of its

trademarks, and after Plaintiff obtained the trademark and copyright registrations

alleged above. Neither Plaintiff nor any authorized agents have consented to

Defendants use of Plaintiffs Marks, Federally-Registered Copyrights, Common-

Law Copyrights, and/or Design Patent.

35. Defendants actions have confused and deceived, or threatened to

confuse and deceive, the consuming public concerning the source and sponsorship

of the counterfeit Speck products sold and distributed by Defendants. By their

wrongful conduct, Defendants have traded upon and diminished Plaintiffs

goodwill. Furthermore, the sale and distribution of Counterfeit Goods by

Defendants have infringed upon Plaintiffs Marks, Federally-RegisteredCopyrights, Common-Law Copyrights, and/or Design Patent.

36. Defendants offering to sell, selling, importing and encouraging

others to import Counterfeit Goods in this manner was and is likely to cause

confusion or to cause mistake and/or to deceive consumers who purchase the

Counterfeit Goods. Defendants also offered to sell, sold, imported, and/or



14/51


14

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

encouraged others to import for purpose of resale within the United States

Counterfeit Goods consisting of reproductions and/or copies of products bearing

Plaintiffs Marks, Federally-Registered Copyrights, Common-Law Copyrights,

and Design Patent. Defendants use of such Marks, Federally-RegisteredCopyrights, Common-Law Copyrights, and Design Patent was done without

Plaintiffs authorization.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

(Trademark Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON,

Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5

TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)

[15 U.S.C. 1114/Lanham Act 43(a)]

37. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other

allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as though fully set forth in this

cause of action.

38. Defendants actions as described herein constitute direct and/or

contributory trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a).

39.

As a proximate result of Defendants trademark infringement,

Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial. Further, Plaintiff

alleges on information and belief that, as a proximate result of Defendants

trademark infringement, Defendants have unlawfully profited in an amount to be

proven at trial.

40. At all relevant times, Defendants acted intentionally and/or willfully

in using the Marks on the Counterfeit Goods, knowing that said Marks belongedto Plaintiff, that the Counterfeit Goods were in fact counterfeit, and that

Defendants were not authorized to use said Marks on the Counterfeit Goods.

Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recovery of treble damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C.

1117(a). Further, Defendants knowing, intentional and/or willful actions make

this an exceptional case, entitling Plaintiff to an award of reasonable attorney fees



15/51


15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a).

41. Defendants actions also constitute the use by Defendants of one or

more counterfeit mark as defined in 15 U.S.C. 1116(d)(1)(B). Plaintiff

therefore reserves the right to elect, at any time before final judgment is entered inthis case, an award of statutory damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1)

and/or (2).

42. The acts of direct and/or contributory trademark infringement

committed by Defendants have caused, and will continue to cause, Plaintiff

irreparable harm unless they are enjoined by this Court.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

(False Designation of Origin, False or Misleading Advertising Against

Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION

SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10,

Inclusive)

[15 U.S.C. 1125 (a)]


allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this

cause of action.

44. Defendants actions as described herein constitute direct and/or

contributory violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1)(A), as such actions are likely to

cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation,

connection, or association of Defendants with Plaintiff and/or as to the origin,

sponsorship, and/or approval of such Counterfeit Goods by Plaintiff.45. As a proximate result of Defendants violation as described herein,

Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial. Further, Plaintiff

alleges on information and belief that, as a proximate result of defendants direct

and/or contributory trademark infringement, Defendants have unlawfully profited,

in an amount to be proven at trial.



16/51


16

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

46. Defendants acts of violating, directly and/or contributorily, Section

1125 have caused, and will continue to cause, Plaintiff irreparable harm unless

they are enjoined by this Court.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

(Trademark Dilution Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant

STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5


[15 U.S.C. 1125(c)]



cause of action.

48. Plaintiffs Marks are distinctive and famous within the meaning of

theLanham Act.

49. Upon information and belief, Defendants unlawful actions began

long after Plaintiffs Marks became famous, and Defendants acted knowingly,

deliberately and willfully with the intent to trade on Plaintiffs reputation and to

dilute Plaintiffs Marks. Defendants conduct is willful, wanton and egregious.

50. Defendants intentional sale of fake, pirated and counterfeit items

bearing Plaintiffs Marks is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive,

mislead, betray, and defraud consumers to believe that the substandard imitations

are genuine products manufactured by Plaintiff. The actions of Defendants

complained of herein have diluted and will continue to dilute Plaintiffs Marks,

and are likely to impair the distinctiveness, strength and value of PlaintiffsMarks, and injure the business reputation of Plaintiff and its marks.

51. Defendants acts have caused and will continue to cause Plaintiff

irreparable harm. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law to compensate it fully

for the damages that have been caused and which will continue to be caused by

Defendants unlawful acts, unless they are enjoined by this Court.



17/51


17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

52. As the acts alleged herein constitute a willful violation of section

43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive

relief as well as monetary damages and other remedies provided by 15 U.S.C.

1116, 1117, 1118, and 1125(c), including Defendants profits, treble damages,reasonable attorneys fees, costs and prejudgment interest.

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

(Unfair Competition Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant

STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5


California Business & Professions Code 17200 et seq.

53.

Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other

allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this

cause of action.

54. Defendants actions described herein constitute unlawful, unfair

and/or fraudulent business acts or practices. Defendants actions thus constitute

unfair competition pursuant to California Business & Professions Code

17200.

55. As a proximate result of Defendants actions, Plaintiff has suffered

an injury in fact, including without limitation, damages in an amount to be proven

at trial, loss of money or property, and diminution in the value of its trademarks.

Plaintiff therefore has standing to assert this claim pursuant to California Business

& Professions Code 17204.

56.

Defendants actions have caused, and will continue to cause Plaintiffto suffer irreparable harm unless enjoined by this Court pursuant to California

Business & Professions Code 17203. In addition, Plaintiff requests that the

Court order that Defendants disgorges all profits wrongfully obtained as a result of

Defendants unfair competition, and order that defendant pay restitution to

Plaintiff in an amount to be proven at trial.



18/51


18

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

(Federal Copyright Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON,

Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5


[17 U.S.C. 501(a)]


allegationsset forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this

cause of action.

58. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of copyrights in and related to its

Speckbranded products packaging, having numerous applications relating to

the same pending with the United States Copyright Office and possessing

copyright registrations with the United States Copyright Office.

59. Defendants did not seek and failed to obtain Plaintiffs consent or

authorization to utilize, manufacture, reproduce, copy, display, prepare derivative

works, distribute, sell, transfer, rent, perform, and/or market Plaintiffs copyright-

protected materials.

60.

Without permission, Defendants intentionally and knowingly

reproduced, counterfeited, copied, displayed, and/or manufactured Plaintiffs

protected works by offering, advertising, promoting, retailing, selling, and

distributing counterfeit Speck-branded products contained within product

packaging which is at a minimum substantially similar to Plaintiffs copyright

protected product packaging.

61.

Defendants acts as alleged herein, constitute infringement ofPlaintiffs copyright, including Plaintiffs exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute

and/or sell such protected material.

62. Defendants knowing and intentional copyright infringement as

alleged herein has caused and will continue to cause substantial and irreparable

harm to Plaintiff and has and will continue to cause damage to Plaintiff. Plaintiff



19/51


19

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

is therefore entitled to injunctive relief, damages, Defendants profits, increased

damages, and reasonable attorneys fees and costs.

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

(Common Law Copyright Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK

MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant

MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)

[California Civil Code980 et seq., and California Common Law]


allegationsset forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this

cause of action.

64.

At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff has held and still holds the

exclusive rights under California law and common law to reproduce, distribute, or

license the reproduction and distribution of the artwork, design, pictures,

representation, model and patterns protected by Plaintiffs Common-Law

Copyrights in any and all formats and mediums, throughout the United States.

65. The artwork, design, pictures, representation, model and pattern of

protected by Plaintiffs Common-Law Copyrights are original works in tangible

form which have been widely disseminated and published since at least in or

about September 2001.

66. The conduct herein complained of was extreme, outrageous,

fraudulent, and was inflicted on Plaintiff in reckless disregard of Plaintiffs

rights. Defendants acts have irreparably harmed and continue to harm Plaintiffs

exclusive proprietary rights and constitute common law copyright infringementand unfair competition. Defendants outrageous conduct supports an award of

exemplary and punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and make an

example of Defendants and to deter them from similar conduct in the future.

67. Each infringing transfer, duplication, sale, rental, distribution, display

and other exploitation of the artwork, design, pictures, representation, model and



20/51


20

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

patterns protected by Plaintiffs Common-Law Copyrights constitutes a separate

claim against Defendants under common law copyright and California Civil Code

980.

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

(Federal Design Patent Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK

MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant

MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)

[35 U.S.C. 71]



cause of action.

69. Plaintiff is the owner of the Design Patent with the USPTO

Registration No.: US 8,204,561 B2. (SeeExhibit E, Design Patent hereto)

70. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe Plaintiffs Design

Patent by using, selling and/or offering to sell, in the United States and/or

importing into the United States, Counterfeit Goods which embody the designed

covered by the Design Patent. Defendants infringing products include all of the

ornamental designs in Plaintiffs Design Patent drawings. By its conduct,

Defendants have violated 35 U.S.C. 271 by direct infringement of Plaintiffs

Design Patent.

71. On the basis allege, Defendants have gained profits by virtue of its

infringement of the Design Patent.

72.

As a direct and legal result of Defendants wrongful conduct,Plaintiff has been and will be irreparably and permanently harmed; wherefore

Plaintiff is without an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled

to, among other things, an order enjoining and restraining Defendants from further

engaging in the infringement of the Design Patent.

73. Defendants infringement of the Design Patent is and has been willful



21/51


21

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to its monetary damages, in an amount to be

proven at trial, and award of treble damages, and its reasonable attorneys fees and

costs.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests the following relief

against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION

SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10,

inclusive, and each of them as follows:

1. An order and judgment preliminary and permanently enjoining

Defendants and their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees,

affiliates, attorneys, and all others acting in privity or in concert with

them, and their parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors and assigns

from further acts of infringement of Plaintiffs asserted Design Patent;

2. For an award of Plaintiffs damages and Defendants profits adequate to

compensate Plaintiff for Defendants infringement of the Design Patent,

and in no event less than a reasonable royalty for Defendants acts of

infringement, including all pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as

the maximum rate permitted by law;

3. For an award of all damages, including treble damages, based on any

infringement found to be willful, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, together

with prejudgment interest;

4. For an award of all profits, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289 together with

prejudgment interest;5. For an award of Defendants profits and Plaintiffs damages in an

amount to be proven at trial for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C.

1114(a);

6. For an award of Defendants profits and Plaintiffs damages in an

amount to be proven at trial for false designation of origin and unfair



22/51


22

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2324

25

26

27

28

competition under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a);

7. For $2,000,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of goods sold, offered

for sale, or distributed under 15 U.S.C. 1117(c);

8.

For an award of Defendants profits and Plaintiffs damages in anamount to be proven at trial for trademark dilution under 15 U.S.C.

1125(c);

9. In the alternative to actual damages and Defendants profits for the

infringement and counterfeiting of Plaintiffs trademarks pursuant to the

Lanham Act, for statutory damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c),

which election Plaintiff will make prior to the rendering of final

judgment;

10.For restitution in an amount to be proven at trial for unfair, fraudulent

and illegal business practices under Business and Professions Code

17200;

11.For damages to be proven at trial for common law unfair competition;

12.For temporary, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief from this

Court prohibiting Defendants from engaging or continuing to engage in

the unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business acts or practices described

herein, including the advertising and/or dealing in any counterfeit

product; the unauthorized use of any mark, copyright or other

intellectual property right of Plaintiff; acts of trademark infringement or

dilution; false designation of origin; unfair competition; and any other

act in derogation of Plaintiffs rights;13.For an order from the Court requiring that Defendants provide complete

accountings and for equitable relief, including that Defendants disgorge

and return or pay their ill-gotten gains obtained from the illegal

transactions entered into and or pay restitution, including the amount of

monies that should have been paid if Defendants complied with their



23/51

legal obligations, or as equity requires;

2 14.Fo r an order

from th

e Court

th

at an asset freeze or constructi

ve tru

st be

3

imposed over a ll monies and profits in Defendants possession which

4

rightfully belong

to

Pl

aintiffs;

5

IS.For destruction

of

the in

fr in

ging articles

in

Defendants possessi

on und

er

6 1

5U.S.C.

III 8;

7 16. For treble damages s

uff

ered by Plaintiff as a result of the willful and

8

intentional infringements a

nd

acts of counterfeiting engaged in

by

9 Defendants, under 15 U.S.C. I I 17(b

;

I 0

17.For damages in an amount to be proven at

tri

al for unjust e

nri

chm ent;

I I

18.Fo r an awa

rd of

exemplary or puniti

ve

damages in an amount to be

12

determined by

th

e Court;

13 19.for Plaintiff s reasonable attorney s fees;

14 20.For a

ll

costs

of

suit; a

nd

15 2 1.Fo r such other and further rei ef as the Court may deem just and

16 eq uitable.

17

Q ~ M N D

FOR

JURY

TRI L

18 Plaintiff SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN, LLC, dba SPECK

19

PRODUCTS, respectfully demand s a

tri

al by jury

in thi

s ac

ti

on.

20

21

DATED: August 13,2014

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHNSON

&

PHAM, LLP

i

C

hri

sto

ph

er Q. Ph am, Es

q.

Hung Q. Pham, Esq.

Attorneys fo r Pla inti ff

SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN,

LLC dba SPECK PRODUCTS

2 1

CO

MPL INT

FOR

D M GES



24/51

EXHIBIT

A

Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 28 Page ID #:24


25/51

nrf, C ,:

9

ftior

u,$,

ils.: 2tr, 23,

26,

36

rnd

30

[-luited

Ststes

Farleut

and

Tnademarlr

Orffriee

lllL4 ]EtldAM

F&ryCryAL

EEGISTEF.

Feg. i{o,

3,653,010

Rlgleluel

.3- 8, 4, 2009

SPECK

SPECULATWE IRODUCT DESION, INC.

I

FO.IUflA

CORPONAIION). DEA

SPECIC

DIJCTS

2]? FOREIiT

AVE:\'IJE

PALO

ALTo.

C{,r'E0t

.J

FOII PITOTECTITE CiRN]'INO C,\SES

FO]I

FOII'TADLE ELEfiROhtIC LETEI\iING

DEYICT'S

.IJ.ID

l{UslC FL4 ERs,

NAME'y,

IvIPJ

PLAYEnS,

ANO

FOR PO]ITAI}LE

COI{PUTTIIs, OLOBAL

I.

srTloMNG sysiEhts

(GDs

DEvrcEs),

ldoBrLE

/U{D CELLUTA

R

TELEP:IONE5, PORTNILE

ulD'

Cr\LI.

Fll0.

fA

PhYSI$

,Vr'D PERIONT\I

DIGITAL

A5Sl5,

TANTS,

tN

CLust (U.S.

Cts,

tt,3l,

-'6,t6

AJ{D lll},

Ftl(ST

USE

l:n)?001; N COI\lifEJtlE

ll'll-lcoJ,

1]lE

: Hfl.

CoNSItrfS oF

SL/WDI lD CfiAn.

AC'ERs \\ITHOUT

gL{M

TD-.tl'II' IA

RTICUI."A

R

GDHT,

gTyLE,

SIZE,

OR C0L0R,

sER,

NO.

7t.it8,150, FILED

t0-e-:008.

Ajslli, sAl-[hr,

e{n]r,flNING

ATToP,Nn'



26/51

EXHIBIT B



27/51

lint

C3.; 9

hior

[J,S.

rCls,l

?I, ?3, 26,36awd33

{Jmirled

States

F;rtemrl aman Tradernurrlq

tDffice

t'[tAD]0MIARI{

DiTEqCFtI,IPJC1STER

IPeg,

Itlo.

3r656,il82

Regislerej

trr

?n 9

IA

TIA1

ENS,

AND

PENSONAI

DIGTIAL

ASSIS.

TnuYni,

rr't

cL^ss

I

(u,s,

clg, ll

,

1, 26,

16

AI'JD

3E),

FmST USE

).3:-2007it1\- COMdERCE

t-3t-:007

Tl{6

hrAFl( coNsisls

oF

r'J.l isTEldsl( BE-

TWEEN

FARENTHESES

FOLLONED

gY

TH8

WORD

TSPECTCI

IN STYLIZED

TFIT.ENS,

sE ,.

NO,

77.600,,1O,

FILED

10.34.1008,

AISH.{

5ArEM, .EL

l,{tNtN.*c

ATtC'tU.tE]'

,Aii,\

Irrhd/

\t

trj

spEcuLAt$E

ploDucr

DEsloN,

INq

(cALI-

FOn'r-lA

CoRFoRnTloN). DBA SPECK PRO'

DUCTS

]17 FOREST

AVENUE

PALO

ALTD,

C/t

9+301

FoRr

PROTECmTE CARRYINO

4ASES

FOn

PORTATLE

ELECTROI\IC

USTlh'lNc DE1'ICES

.AND

I{USIC

PLAYERS.

N,l]vtELy,

hlPl

PLAyEnS,

3I.iD

FOR

ORT,{FLE COM I.JTER$, GLOBAL PO,

stTJol.lING sYsTElrs

(cps

DEytcEs),

t?tornrE

AT.ID

CELLUIAR

TELEPHONES,

PORT..\I]LE

ItED,



28/51

EXHIBIT

C



29/51

&lt, Ci.:9

Elisr

U.S,

CIs,

11,

23,

26, 36

ard

3ts

trinlted

Stbtes

Patemrl

and

Tradeuaark

t0ffiee

ITEADEMA$I '

P \trllclPF3

BlEGISlE.il

S CULATI'E

PNODUCT

DESIGN.,INC. I

T'-ONNL,\

CORPORANOI'I),

DBA STJECI(

DUgIS

::7

FOIE5T AVlr'{U.E

I'ALO ALTO, CA

tU0t

CALI.

llto.

E-ez,

Itlo,

J,666,07?

ItcEtbnC .i-q.

JJ,

2889

lA FLAYEIiS,

A)'lD

FIIISONAI

i]tcrAl

,ISSIJ,

TAi.:TS,

N

CLA5S I0J.S.

Cls. ?1, ]J,36,

J6

AND

lB),

FnST

USr

l-31- 00?i

I.l

CoNIItIIRCE

t.lt.zCD?.

THE

]IARI(

Col'lslSTS

OF

/U,l ASTERI]K

Bb'.

T{'EIN'I PAREI\THESE5,

SEIL

N0, ?7-it8,l5l FlLrD

10.?t-? 00.

6lSH,1

SALE

I, EliLlv'lNlNo

AITOn}TEy

FOItr P oTECIn'E

CARltl'll'{G O\SES

FoR

IOJTTAIILE

ELECIITOI'IC

U5TENN{G

DE\ICES

N.tD ItUSIC

PLA)'ERS,

H,\l\tELl"

hIpJ

.tIERs,

AI.TD

FOR IORTA LE

COhlFUNif{s. GLODAL

PO.

slTtol{rNo sysThts

(ors

DEvIsEt,

h.toErLr

AhD

CELLULAR

TELETHONIT, t'ORTAELE

NtED.



30/51

EXHIBIT

D



31/51

@lrrotoi

eb FtCIrteg

of

Rmryre

,ytf,ry

Gnvrite

trlgte#

jFotert

runb

@i'ebaliler6

@'t fte

CAI-JDYS}TELL

ltcp.

Ho,

3.17.709

s0ECrJL^[\'li

PJrorJUc'f DEsrc]t,

$lc.

(crltForu'n^

collFoMlioN),

DD\ sl'ri$a

'

FI{O]}UCIS

ReFis*rcretX

Jely 13, 2010

:zr

ronmrrrvr+nn,

,

l''/\ O ALI'O.

C'1 $llu I

lnt.

CE,:

9

.IRADEIvIARK

}R(NCITAL

ITIGISTtrR

IOIL I'IoTtiClI\'Jj CAtUi'YlN0

L'^SU5

U[

Llr]

I'IAYERS,

I

DPI -Li

^ND

Ctir.t,Ur.Alt

ll1l.tiPIloNlil, P0Rli\lll,li MIiDL\ Pl.^\'liRli.Al,ll)

PlillS0l,t4l. l)l(illi\1. nsSlsT,$(l.s

,

It

l

CLAss

t

(U5,

cls,

1 1

,

:3,5,

Jti

rlHD

l

B).

I llls f

IJSE

1.6.:0UtJi

lN CO[rI'lEItC[

1{i.30ur.

lte

rt(nr

ccwstsrs or srAr'rDAIrD

cHAMsrELs

\'[n:our

cLArM

].

Al,ry

pin-

'llcul^n

roNT, sryLE, stzE, oR colott,

stirL No.?4l]t:ll, F0.lit)

I

t-?5.:0rr,)

lvt {llHl:$'

P,ql'lhs, UMJVU}IING

nll

OltNEY

D;t

{qr

lr{r{

{t

d'

lpillr$, dr.

1

.fi'cr

{rra'



32/51

EXHIBIT

E



33/51

llilflilIflrll ffi

illllulftilil

ffiil fl[lllll

fiIfl

flnffi

fiI

ilfl

lffi

l

us00820456182

(rD

{Jnited States Fatent

Mongrn

et

al,

0o)

Pslent

No,:

(4s)

Dotc oflatenl:

LJS 8,204,561 82

Jun.

I9,2012

(50

oNE PIiCE CO.lOlL]ltiD

It\TlitUOR

IIART)

SIELL C^SE

WITS.AN

EtnSTO

[ruC

LINER

FOR

IIIOBTLE ELECTRONIC

DEVICES

fi/1999 Al$au5c.ld.

6/ 000 KllchE .Eadi

Ue000 llosrrd,

t .

le00t

Yoncdct


34/51

us

E,204,s61

B2

PoBB

z

6,?71,25?

El

6J71,056

BI

65t4.7:2 Bl

6661,t74

EI

6,78J,566

Ur

6p14,?74 Hl

6,980,7?? R?

688t,589 R2

7,11ff,00{ BZ

7J,ll,lel

Fl

D5 1,319 S

D5 1.?46

S

7.551.r,tt

l]:

7,509,512 n:

7$2t,8rr

Bl

i,647,08?

82

D617,?E{ S

7.9t1,t2 BZ

3mt/0002003

Al

r00i/0(no[

Al

t00l/0068 15 At

1rJ03/00?0r5, At

Il0y00[]094

l

o0l/0r03c24

Al

Iqll/ol

t66

At

20{l,tr00l1l06

Al

?00t0151?t At

2@ 8t74727 it

?00t02?9661 l

?0n6/0040550

l

?u06/0t6t800

Al

t0{t?/00602:.1

A

?0t7/0181?81

A

?008,001 718

A

2008/0019t61 A

3008/00 6610 A

:rxr8/0t17507 A

:00&0Ix84

A

20D9IlOt?33t

A

00t/0080151

,1

:0091011ts'll

A

:{r t/o rr+11{

A

:0tq/0006.iIq

A

t0lu/00?gl.tl

A

?0lq0096t6rt Jl

?0lu/010.t814

A

r0l0/0tr618? A

l' rdell

ki:atry

lbeulnl

Ririllrkor

Hobbsg

fiolllbjlg

Rtchr soo 4al,

lllcluGoE cl nI.

l'l'r4lol

0uc$cl$ct 1.

Hu

Xenppi cr

Mclisnncl

il.

Chu,-.,.-."....---.." 455/5?5,{

Llc

ar

il.

,",..,,,.--.-

4i5/57J.s

'r8i

RictinLo

r

L

Chiincy

cl ol,

U.S. I',ATENT DOCIJMENTS

20t0/01{4411

At

2lt0/01477t5 ,1l

?0tqui:t515

r1l

64010

PcnirEill

612010

Yialioli

cr ol

9E010

vld

cr

al.

FOIIIICN I'IIIIjNL DOC:UMINTS

0zllt6t

At 22w?

OTIIBR PllBLlc/ ]ONS

&/200t

lly20D2

9t?og7

lz200l

84004

7T?oE5

113005

lt2.E6

7EW7

3/30 8

r':00t

('300t

6/?00t

97000

Itv:o0t

I

U 009

l/:010.

dlol0

4/:01r

r2001

?20[]

dlo0:t

4l]001

y 001

(irto0l

&3 01

tn00I

?/:Q05

8/1005

lv 005

1J2UA6

7t2006

x,.-pn1

8/ 007

z 000

z:0 H

,l/1008

t/t008

l0/ 008

teflr9

3/ tD

'v20w

vl l],

tEot0

4110r0

4/:010

,v 0r0

J/r0to

S 0cl

Folccdon

ofFotultu drcuDDic

lFdsctr:

Sl'o* td|loE

EpelrM, dlrE8u

boundry.4rFoEh

Bnd

blyond

ClotEl,

5

(RqrdDI)i

P.pabFoulur,

JMi sullivft ,

PIAT&T

Ildl lrbr, L c r

T.cb-ool,WlFls n EI b.600MlAYc,Itrt lb-zIalttumyllill,NJ,

0?974

(?Epri osh.clMdVbhdoa

199?,vol.4,

N..1,

F,

169-191,

ldpEltrB

lhrucl tolcec. ol

nDnol'lc

.lcctrctlc

t.qiEEi

cs

iluJyolcdlul

phonc.

S. Coyd, S.

UpuFiiDlil

D-V.

Lltlclt-l? d.

a' 01Mchsls Covs

Ddrc:

Ms. ,s,

lt9,

PubliEicc

SttiDls

BlsrorlSSNl0014485l

Sirbjcq;

f'rglBc.dn

shn

F.,[t

ElIlI

F

5]

vol,39

here

I

URL: hlF/,,(rdo1,oB/10.100711r02:l:tlu0

Dotr

I0.l007rBm2l?9300i l0

Fp,

Cindyshdl

Sours brF/

vch0nftivt.o'E/w$n00H

ll l80i5J09/

hfl

F,/1w1l*sFlhrEd

cts.com/nEducltct

dyrbell/rplolc.l ,,

16l,lide l&t008.I

F.

Rllu ol s o L EiInElc sptrugr

i

cllFAic

prD.ticr

r$pL$lor

dill

Cotd,

S.,

Ello'

CEry

w,,

BuErylltli, Elstd

X. l .

brs-

liri@l

JouEd

ofMilBilrliE

uld

El


35/51

{.LS. Fatent Jur,

19, 2012

Sheer

I

0f 6

10

us 8,204,561

B2

12

r5

16

13

23

17

18

z6

F[G" {



36/51

{1,S.

Fatent

Jun.

19, 2012 Sheet 2

0f

6

20

13

F$G" 2A

12

us 8,204561

92

20

12

20

13

n--"

"

FEG"

2B



37/51

U.S"lPatent

Jun.19,2012

Sheet3of6

12

20

FEG"

3

us

8,204,561

B2

21

23



38/51

U,S.

Fatent

Jun.

19, ?oI2 sheet 4 of

6

21

F[G.4

20

19

FEG" 6

us

8,204,561 B2

13

12

13

,12



39/51

{.LS.lPatent

Jun.19,2012 sheets016

IJS 8,204,561B2

21

n

19

13

22

12

F[G.5



40/51

U,S,lPatent Jun.19,201?

Sheet6of6

u.

us 8,204,561

82

12

lJ

F$G"

7A

FEG" 78

13

tt



41/51

us

8,204"561 82

72

ONE PII,:CE CO.FoINII|D

g-T{TERIOR

D.ilrD

Dsc 6

lilic

rhc

tdil ot

rs

o.iiBJ

pbodc

usd would

likc

lo

SIIELL

(:rsl;

rYlm, \

l,f,.ASToMEIUC

Elli

0h

dur

fctl

bm still

* l

llmrcsliod

for

rhcir dcdcc.

LINER 'oltMoBILEELECTRONIC ltebrdlmrccrivccxtcdnrshcllofdl'prcscotisv@0oob

-_ DEVICE.5

o

low

cocfficicntofllictior1

Tbis

alloNs

th

dcviccro cosily

bc

J

$lirpral

h

llod our of

poEkcc

catily wi$oul

bccdt{ng

IUifjUfD.^PUUCAIIONS

ollscLld or

wi$oul

Ercxt

rcsist&le.lo

clolhjoE

EDleri |s. r1

rrujor coElhiql.lioE

cuErtrl

(,'lilstc@criu

q.lsc

usJrs.

Tbis lpplication

i5

0 coMINUAIoN

of u.s.

pltctrt

lho

c.se

lmgl

by lbc

ltlccnl

iuvcrtioD

br's

trn

inlcrior

Dppticali;;

Scr,

No. U.,lf6,?69,

lllq.d

f.cb,

6

|

200r,

ll. ;

cD -

cla onc;c

lortior

lh l.

Frovid6.shork

Prclecliod

for lhc

d;b

of

which

is

iDcolronltb

l"r"ir

ry

'.roio*,

r0

da'icc f| D1

d'ofFr.E8;

ljrls'

or

olhcr

iftlnta

TlL

i te'io'

clustoncdc

loaion

nL

o

c{rsurcs thc dcvicc ond thD tasc Jit

'ILOIMCAI-

lil|jLD

OF TIIE INVLN]ION

rogerlrlrrviu o

guire

us

tho

q$c

is

singlc

pictc

ossetbly,

IIID

cre

b 3

0

vcry Eolid

mnorcliotl

lo Io

lhollc

DEd

fcEI6

1tc

prEstlr

iqvcotloE

rluca

$inoElly

ro

llldbrld

Eobilu

lalrcErly hilh

quDlily

ud

li8lnvciShl

elect$iic

drviujr.

sucll I|J{

pcr:onaldicitol

ossislopl, ccllu.

15

\{lul

mokcs

lLdr

cascdiJlcrc[l

ie lhcgcollclry

der u_

Ior

rdlcplouq

lab

top compirtcn nr

poiobl

rliBitr Ercdh

frcluritrgofthecsre Thcc](lcliorhltJdsll :llnsd

ic lorucd

to

plryv.

ttlorc

4ccifiirlly

llie

pnscoi iouurion nlotcs ro a

lil

lhc tlq.jrc cl0$sly wilh n lnnqll

olTFet

lmn

tho

dcviccs

'arulriph+oopincnr

pnxrcLivi:

crsc for mobilc

qlc{trcnic

curlsca

T[c cxlsrior

hard

sllcli rJls

lJotlnd Lha cd8cf oltltc

dEviar,

du'icc it is lbrmd for.

lo

lllow

*rc

6hcll

to

bc

ablc lo bc

:o

lDo olcd

on

d$

devlcc

tllc corluls

ot

lhc

blJtl Ehcll all, cur

opus-

Tlis

alloivs

coc)r

sidqf,all

10

fls

ovty whc d$,ie

is

i'$cncd

srd snlr bnEL

orcc

ir iE

io

CocllTtDuEiflc

r+nr

nr

th'E

crs is

rhnl

6c

elndomeriE

malrdd ls

formud

in

uddillon

lo Uru rlcriorhlrd cll

nn tll

inlcriorof tllEcncrior

hud

slcl, thu cl loolL=lE ltilluri l

lllls ir

Utc

goF

ctd(cd ol

ibe

corqcrs

ollbc srtcdor

hdrd

$cl)

L

rll'iw

dic

Ldrd

r[cl

to

Ilcx

for ]0untioB, Tlc chsllE

ric

roalcriul

is

Frovidcd

inl-hls

loEr ion

tc.auu it hll

mucl,

gE1rlst inlcrcrt fl$db:liry t0n

lhc

trhrlic

Drnul

lollic

cxlcdor blral shull

d

it slilctcs

sulEuicntly

to

.rlLrw

drc

sirlc*nlls ofdrc

qlctior

hard shcu

10

eljll

IL*

r]ray

on

mourtilg.Thk

cl(stcsa olc..pic'cc

c[scdrol

wtats

orDuld

phoru

oro rumobilc

clectronic dcvicc

crto

on

l,ollllrg Dod

plsvcds

difl md Ruid fmo cnrcrioE

whur'

cvlr bossible.

'l

be

clD5toharic lincrolso

can bo

ftmcd

olEr

uru

b'r:ttDns

0n

thc

drouu

whufti

u

us .simply

pirrll5

rbE

clnnofteric

linErmrEr nndils

lo

ll)c

Iloaioo

of

Gc

mb;lc

cbcrNDlc dLryhc lnput

dlol lrdcsircd.

BNEF DESCR]TTJON

OF'fHTi I)IT41VINCS

TIrc srrompDnyhg

dD$in8s, whjc

&c ircorloFlcd

hcrci

Ed

lbnn s pan

o[ 6c

slcsi]icolion.

illuslmt

dre

I'Il,rcol

irrslioo u d,

logrLbcr villl

Urc dr5cril,tion, fuihcr

Ecrvc

l$

uxtloin

d)c

nrinEinlc

ofdlc ilvcllioa

ud'l

ttr

crublc

o

prcon

slillc.t h tltc

Fdhcrt

irn

lo

m*

Erd uc Ib

i[vcrlio&

EIC.Ih

0

pcFpecrivE

vias

ofo bsDdlElddsviEcFml

rcrivc

m9c

delicllo

lhu o0crDll

hld

sLcll loycr

rvi6

cDlcoEcrr

Dod

unor

rlrnomcric lrycr

oftlru

prull.clivs

srrting

qlse

whcrc

illills

io

rc

crt co(llerg ofthc'etlertll

hrd 5Ic1l hyq;

fIGs.

s nnd 2j

lrE

scEriold

eiL.#

ofihDprulo4ivc6tc

ol thc

pnrcor

lnvmdon

slrnvi 8

rhu dcrcnl cr -lllcd by *t

inner cl0nancric

ldyF lor sccudsg

dsvice

in

ro c sc;

$lO,

r

:s

ll

lop

'.Elbes d

yls

of

a

budlcld

dcvicc

Iorcclirr-

cosc dcf,iclirg$c a(cmo) atd

EhcI

lsycrwilL

cu

concts

d irllcrc'dl1orEsic

luycroldLc

pNlelivc crdyiDg

ciro vhctc

is

filh i-o lhr cul comels

oI

l

cKcrnll L0td shcll

hycr dllllsddilionll

I

orBo cllstoDc[ic

ovcrltnd

tor

sccirn

ldg

o

dcvic ;

l;l(1, { iF

sl:cLiooul

vi w

oIUe

pmlEclivc

c 5c Ltftlc

pt tctr

hN'cndo

slowi 8

tlru

)urEc

closloEctic

ovsbrnd

for

s8 ur'

iog

r

duYicli

ljlc.5

is

n

pc$pLYlivc vlc? of

thc

FtDtrttivc

c05c oflhc

niE.icD

Invcnrion

brfurc dsviEc ir

su-Un:] dluI[in;

llC. 6 is Il

pc I 'cdvlt

vjcw ollhc

Irutuclivc

clls(tlllucbcd

lo

a

sompls

dcvic

shorv'irg

&c

dclcol

crslcd

by

lbc

iolcr

cl flomlric

la)'cr

Ior

$cclE irg u

devicc

in

lb', cnsq

md

BACKCIROIJND

OF 1'I

IJi

IIWENIION

Tlcru

ilro

m $y

sJscs for lEndheld

elcclrloic

dcviccs.

]l'ry tall iolD fuu

Elin

crlssedcr

F:hstolrutidtublcr

ekirs,

llJd

plarric

rhilk,

cu lld sLN

$rlctidls

lld

cobi-

lItjori

of fte5c, In

gcncn

l

lbRclaslomcd crscs

llc tiodc

ski

wUc ,

blx[usc

ofttc

flcxjhle lBlurE

ofdru nulcd0l, m

uu\ily

hc

sucrched ovu'

tlc

devico

rnd

dlfr

oncc

illndlql

collorm

closely

tu

tI(.

sbq,o

ol

Uo

qcvicc,

Tle rubtsry

rrurcriul

trrD

pr$vidclcry

EDorl

$o krEiiellucu.

ll)c do$'l-

sidc

offtesc

rypcq

ofc,acr

ii

lbal &c

dlnorcric

llllerial

lns

a

lriglr

.ftED

friclon

scmcilat. tt -c lruJils fiis ryFc oI

crse

dilficuk

lu

llE

io

Dsd

rEeovc

liom

pockcGltodolhci

righl

th@.

Whrris nrL{d is r

devicc

ltul

oncre

llerery

good

stoElirlj3;Irunccofu n

cft

Lelirflrtricerrcwi$oul

w hid]

slrlucc t iclior

.ocllicicot

mo$rs il morc

cowcqil.Ilcc for

Ijhrd

lloltic

rlulls

norDouy

Bro

Ennui0ctlfcd lls roorc

ElnonBplecelosllow

tlEdevircl0 Flideinln

thcc4qcfu loru

bElDgcloscd

jo\r,jlhrsEcoEdlrypllts,Additiunrllythcf

y,ill

a0

oftco llrvc s

lilcr

ofclllromcric

Eulfdul,

Nhldr

h l s

Io

cuslion

te

iLvicc.

Tb

.r

bo

co-mold.d,

Irlo

cldy

sluclEd

nrlloaliog

rrith

thc ne*:fibly. Cul

nad S "w ce{:s

&c

soEtlllly

d0dD

lloh

flli

rto [

matcrid,

wL]cfi k cut

jrlo

lalrenls

uod 0rs L'wtriDlo

u

Elups

lbrllhc

dLaie co

ilido

rr

futo.'ftc

dcaicc

lE

dl,n

llcld

iD

lluuo,

by friclion

or ll

dlrnl

of

soEc fDrE.'l-hc

downsids

o

ttlsc

dcviccs

isrhut it clln bc

difrlulr

ro

lulchcd

u dr{ic{

to

rigiLl

c$e, or+hrfli n casc

hls D sEcoodrry

llEcc

for $jcurlng

s

&vicc,

it

cln &i bull

Io

d'cmmbinndon oldrc dcvlcD

qrd

cIrE

mnkitrg

it imtnctic0l,

l0

AdditioEllt

Ur nni

ullcur

ofcarc'

which uc rlqul$tl

to

bc

cul

uod sc\rh togcthcr

gIthdy

hclcurcs

cosl wh (

is

lll.dlxl

G a

trrEu

tLat combinut bor lad slcli

cEscs oDd

closluEcric E

criul llr

ii

clry

lo

Floducc

ald ruqulrEs

minlor

raolcriDl ;n

lll

pnduclion.

55

SUMMTUTY OF

TIIP I}IWNTION

'[tu

llrtlrn

illvclrtion

is

un

implowncn

Dwr Oe exigllng

flscs bc{ausc il coEbioL.s ll:bcstfEaNftcoIbolhb dcusu 6

and

thc

duroEcriE

6cc \vhjlc tr-ilB ooly

r

siEsic

pln,

which

i5

lJrdicrlt,lrly

uscfbl

fro@ i

cnnsus]cr

vicrvpo_lll

lte

nrcscor

iovcrdon

pmvldcr

s

hld

prulcclivc

cxlcrior

sLtcil,

'Ilir

hld

Frutccdvc

cxlljrior

slrEll

allow3

$c dcvlcr

muxl-

rDuE

luolcclio

lrom idpacrs wiur slurp Dljclli

] e

bllfd d,

Fml{cdvccxlcdorrbcllEjD

cs

UicnnirholsEislirgphoncr,

MPt4

)nyc$.

d i.t

orlcr

Eobilc

clccBodc

dcvicca.

Mrlly



42/51

us 8,204,561

82

34

IICS. ?a

D[d

76 uc

ncrspcllivcvic{rs

oftlc

pnscrl

iqvco-

cur

\yould

bs torE

d

io Uc clostoEedc onlcriol bur thc lkr.

lion

dctlctil8

lhc c.dctDnl

lurd rbell hycr.q,irh

cut

Eolsun iEB

lo slloc o dcvicc tq

6

iNuded

lnto

$clmllcrivc co5c

aDd i (.I cLsrlotluric hycr olrhc

pDlecries

r rryiEEmsci

would('lacGomthDhfitcl.Ertcri

,osdtgrir,cullinglwry

a

rc$lrt,

-sccuring

posilinn

trnd

in

ar

c


43/51

us

8,204,s61

B?

56

lt

is

uffrEisrcd lb

dtc oldmurd

dirqcilsiolll

rclDlioo.

thDr

ir

suflicics

y

lsxiblc

lo

cnsblc

tha

co.qoldcd ole.Piecc

rhilE forific

pons

oflhc iovctri; ,

lo i0clude

vdriuli0n

h

sila

,

rsscEbly lo ddorm

ald tcrcby

accclt insstiDtr of 0I.

Irxr'

motcrirls,

Fc,

forr , fulclioo,

ood rn nnur ofolcrJtir)n,

sno'il clcctronic dcvic .

lslsubly

snd

usa,

ors dclmcd rEoaily

ollDnnt

lDd

obviuus

5.

lfi nnc.Iiocc

ctsc

ofchlm

1

,

whut(in

lh

a(lcdor

hlrd

|D dnc oiordirlry

llill

iotcurL urd di iquilElelt rEhlior.

t luyErircludL:r

ul

llrlrl

f0ur6:dc

surtaccslhll illeltEl Io form

shjpr

ro

tlosa illunElcd

jn

rhs

dFwh&s

qrd

dlscribcd

D llc

l

lurs

l

four comcr

Filt6

[[d

bvo

of

Lhc

.o'u.joi ls

coE'

t;va

dllcdltlon urc ittl d ] lo b;cacoEltoatd

hy lfic

] isc

c -m y

ponioDt

d$t

Lq,oec th cD'doldld flsdblc

pnscDr

iEvadion

i ct luyc

'

Flrthcrfloru,

orhcr Mca6 of da

lrloy

b.Dc6t fi$m

lhls

7-

Tlio

onGplccc.ntE

oldois I' wbqrEln lhc

co-EloldBl

rocdrod & d

ldjrsboEls

lo lbs alcsi8 nJr

0.lricilulcd

llos, ro oDE.FlEc usscEbly-iu;hdc

da ovtdunE

e)(EDNEg trum B

tLru

scolc

of ilu iavurrrion r}ouki be

d t @io d

by llta

toF

I

onioa

I

fone

oiinoreofbc

sid

surfDccs

ill

flil-Jlei

lo

lhE

ll'Fodcd

clnimi

fll

drcir lcgrl

quivdmE,

mlll'

dron hy bollom srrfucc oflhE

oocJ,iKc

c sE.

r6i


44/51

EXHIBIT F



45/51

q r

I

4r

I

liq{L-q - ir 4r,

qalE

Bnsh16s

com&r

ll'orMrlor

oesdinihn:

shoppl.qcan

PayPa$'

Overurel

Aid

rrlr,ne

'

JurdrcR

Hinory shlernenls

Fssotu'Lon Cenler Prcfle

Trai',sa.tion

DeI?rils

lloll e

ExFess

clrckdr

pnyne{

seln

( nique

TEnsadlon

tD

*2\,357324wH31

3320D)

Originar

Transaction

Dn

T'p.

P@r{ 1o

STu

oisldbuir

Sq

crbronrer

seMre uR :

rr:1i

lsi@r

tr

d51pr b ..m

cGlqnor sMce Ernr :

nldji1

r4t|.ulq3eridltrlr

, rl

ned Tolnt

s9 99 USD

Snles T.rt:

SldpDirrg:

$351USO

Seller lscdrior cln'res:

$000USD

Told no[n:

-sI3.53

usD

Fee

fltuxr[:

$0.00 Uso

D .:

Jan ?9 2013

Tirtr4:

?334 5/

PsT

St

rE

compleled

'it.ii;

i:

':-:

CA9130?.1502

|.:

:4

pnyDern

lo:

STU Dislrlbul on SBMcBS

Ohe

reoplenl ollhl

palmenlisvEritletl)

S.ls

s

I0:

dtsmarlFhonesEro0P

s. :d's amiI

[email protected]

con

F n( ru Ti4:

lnslanlTtanster

Fmdr{ Sorr cr 11

3 53 USD

-

J

P MORoAN

CHASE

6ANK

NA

ChecNnq

(Conthed)

x ?735

&rckUpFnndru Sor .:

Masleoad

Credil

Cad

Eoq-Do0(.)C4C


46/51

EXHIBIT G



47/51

trli

l,()5I

AGl.: t'Aill

l'itllt.ry

lir.1w2-.,

ConrBasPrrr.e

'

l'.-

-r.

lJ

tl:ja,:

r:i:,ir,,l

:::rll'r'l

'( t3:)

&,

xa

ffi

ffi

,,:i,

i

l

:r

,l:,r

r:;ri

::i:lr :

::.a.;

:::::

Jp

:i:it.

U,SPS

FIRST-CLASS'NN

PKG

PhTRiCK h{ATTSiCi:

IS4 rf{DLrST,qi^r El.",U

i;-[:

i"-iltli".ii

;FrE\

Tx

75i-tii-

i-*,

,

l,

I

;

t

-

-t

:.

I

i

I

I

I

i

I

l

1

I

1

I

{&

I

irtl.r

1109$

gss

0000

l:.

a,

:.:.:::a,)t:L:':.:tl.'.:,.:'...::.):'::'.":|:,':::.:',t'.):::|::::.::::::..aa.:.:

{ f J

\'w

?

t

l

USPS TRACKING

g

A

l

I

I

i

I

j

I

slli.,

$.flLr

w

i];Y,

w

ffi

'rill,'.::.

383

84

268$

32



48/51

EXHIBIT

H



49/51

$-q

I lep

I 5.,.s&r itcrEtoi

Fe50rloncenler

Prolle

Payqag

ove

ew

Add rlone)

v\,ftidraw

Hlsrory

statemEnts

Trrr r.i i{]iiril

Dataias

I

rvp.

Js29,2013

Add

Fsds

trcn

q

tur* Accdir

[,lohle ExDr+ss

CrFckorI Pnymrn

ser|r

(Un

que

-rransaclior

rD+] 6097902T00716{3ro

0.6

Je

?9, ?013 PayEni To STU oKrbLlo^ sdvies

9rYi139:'.-q

cnsrormt

sdli.e

EnE

l

4 &uear 4q

snhd

51e(

h

i.n

PHOIE

5

SPECK

CA'IDYS.]ELL D'P VOITT

]

AAUA COLOR, ICV\J.

UISA SELLER

&rsirBssCor ndlr(otrnnlioll

CudoDH

SMce URL:

teh Tor.rl

$17.54 USO

snl,es Tnx:

slrlDtlrt:

$l

21 UsD

Selhr

'tscourn

orclfr08.: $0 00 USD

Tor.rr.x'b

'ir:

$1875

USD

Fe.

dmun:

$0.00

USD

Nr

ronn:

-$18.75UsD

tl

e:

Jan 29,2013

Tioe:

?3 34 55 PST

sr.mrs:

comploled

Des.ripttotr:

thopprng Cad

1:rri-,r.i.:

rCA

91 302-1 50?

P(rynletrr

To:

gTU

Dislribulion e ]c3s

(fhe

rccipisnr orrhis

paymentisveriiled)

Sells D:

md5le.hn0l0qles

Selleis

EDnn:

[email protected]

tr

rElr

Tme:

lnslanlTransler

Frrxlfug Sor[

ce:

5l

g.l5

USD

-

J P. MoFoaN CHr'E BANK

NA Cho.kirq

(Connm

eO

*

2785

BnckU0

FntrdiroSorfi

ce:

Maslecard

Credil Card)CCq-IIC{X.FOC(-4844

I' nc|i{,

N{tr

,e':

9t00109699S395?4250790;:1

C

NEII USPS

ordet

sl.ntrsi

sh

pped

(Jan

30,2013)

Needhep,lfyouhdsproblemswhaneEatnansacliororMnthelpsehlino dspulewilhareBayselrer

00l01he

ee3 FesrLulion ceilEr

PayParandeEa/slrontryrecornmendlrralyoustempllolesolyelssues

dlreclywilh lhe

selerrhenerer

possib

e



50/51

EXHIBIT

I



51/51

I

I

ii.r

'.1-

1J

;

.--

i;i;1-l

i;

;i:>

.{

c:s

lrsi

t,()s

I

A(;I t,Alt)

flilrrr-,y

firlwt:

s

C

onrEas

Prrce

-

.-

4

Fi'r'i

7

o.?i[:i.,*

q

ri:i_

I

USPS FIRST.CLASS'*

PKG

ililt];i

:ECHi.i

OL.CGi

E

E

'

9;

ittlu:5:TFilr,:

?;r./D

:j-5

1...r-

.lC(ii.i,l.rE'i

T,x.

75ii05-7:."i;

i

,l

I

I

I

:

r':i:

l.l

..

:.. t

i

I

i

I

I

I

I

0000

f'&

,}

,,,',:;;,

;

t;,11,,i;;;1;,.;;:,C

A [j

1

3fl 2

'

r.r,r.:.,r.r"i. rr.:r:r'irri:rr'ri::.r'r)-r:i,l

150.l

.,. USPs

TRACKING

#

I

I

I

I

ffi

lilill

ffilifi


Documents

Speculative Prods. v. Mattson - Complaint