29
Spatial analysis of geochemical data Shawn Laffan

Spatial analysis of geochemical data

  • Upload
    keaira

  • View
    50

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Spatial analysis of geochemical data. Shawn Laffan. Hotspot identification. Where are the regions of excess element abundance? Greater than expected Anomalously high Where are the regions of less than expected abundance?. Hotspot identification. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Spatial analysis of geochemical data

Shawn Laffan

Page 2: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Hotspot identification

• Where are the regions of excess element abundance?• Greater than expected• Anomalously high

• Where are the regions of less than expected abundance?

Page 3: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 4: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Hotspot identification

• Need quantitative comparison within and between data sets

• Looking for clusters

• Moving window analyses• Geographically local

Page 5: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Tobler’s First Law

• That everything is related to everything else, but that near things are more related than those far apart

Page 6: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Hotspot identification

• Spatial scale• Spatial extent• Spatial non-stationarity• Significance

Page 7: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Getis-Ord hotspot statistic

Page 8: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Getis-Ord hotspot statistic

Sum weighted values

in window

Subtract sum of weights * mean

(expected value)

Divide by standard deviation andcorrect for weights used in window

Page 9: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Getis-Ord hotspot statistic

• Positive for samples that are, on average, above the mean

• Negative if below the mean• Z-score

• >+1.96 significant hotspot• <-1.96 significant coldspot

Page 10: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Choice of weights (sample window)• Binary

• Resultant surfaces can have abrupt changes

• Continuous• Smoother surfaces

Gaussian – asymptotes to zero

IDW - asymptotes to zero

Bisquare – decays to zero

Page 11: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 12: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 13: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Gi* analyses

• Fe, Ni, Pb, Cu, Li, Cr, Ce/Li, Cr/Fe• log10 scaled• 1 km resolution rasters• Maximum value if >1 point in a cell

Page 14: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Gi* analyses

• Bisquare weights with 4 bandwidths• 2, 3, 4 & 5 km

• Identified “optimal” scale at each location • Bandwidth with most extreme Gi* score

Page 15: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 16: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 17: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 18: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 19: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 20: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 21: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 22: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Visual comparison with lithology and landform

• Landform (terrain): • Slope gradient • Longitudinal curvature

Rate of change of slope gradient

+ve = Convex up = spur line

-ve = Concave up = break of slope

0 = Planar

• Circular analysis windowsRadii: 1 & 5 km (local & regional)

• SRTM 3 arc second DEM

Page 23: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 24: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 25: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 26: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data
Page 27: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Conclusions

• Hotspots broadly consistent with lithology

• Weak association with landform• and terrain is controlled by lithology...

• Finer detail possibly due to other causes• e.g. Pb & anthropogenic activities

Page 28: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Jenny’s CLORPT model

• Soil = f (Climate,Organic,Relief,Parent material,Time)

Page 29: Spatial analysis of  geochemical data

Future

• Use alternate expected values• Environmental guidelines• Economic grade

• Analyse as indicators• Binary above/below threshold