23
Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Southern California Water Committee

March 26, 2010Ontario

KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Page 2: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Why is the Delta Important?

Page 3: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Where are we today?

Pelagic Organism Decline ESA lawsuits re: delta smelt and

salmon Additional species candidates for

listing• Green Sturgeon

• Longfin smelt

Drought

Page 4: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

How WaterWater Currently Flows Across the Delta

How WaterWater Currently Flows Across the Delta

1111

SanSanJoaquin Joaquin

RiverRiver

SanSanJoaquin Joaquin

RiverRiver

2222

Sac River Sac River ReversesReversesSac River Sac River ReversesReverses

3333

SWP PumpsSWP PumpsSWP PumpsSWP Pumps

CVP PumpsCVP PumpsCVP PumpsCVP Pumps

Sac RiverSac River– Delta Cross ChannelDelta Cross Channel– Mokelumne River– Mokelumne River– Old & Middle River– Old & Middle Rivers

South DeltaSouth Delta River ReversalsRiver Reversals

Ocean/TidalOcean/Tidal High salinityHigh salinityOcean/TidalOcean/Tidal High salinityHigh salinity

Page 5: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

What is the BDCP?

ESA - HCP NCCPA - NCCP

+ + + =Conservation

StrategyAspects of

implementationConservation

Plan

Multiple species, contribute to long-

recovery

Page 6: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Equal Goals

Water Supply Focus

Page 7: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Equal Goals

Ecosystem Focus

Page 8: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

It is a major challenge to restore an ecosystem in an environment like the Delta that is

highly altered and largely unnatural.

Page 9: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

• Planning Agreement – 2006• Stressors identified; Options evaluated

• Points of Agreement Document – 2007

• Independent Science Reports• BDCP Conservation Principles• Adaptive Management• Terrestrial Species

• Overview of Draft Conservation Strategy – 2009• Modeling

• Preliminary Draft Conservation Strategy – Fall/Winter 20109

Plan Development

Page 10: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Steering Committee

Page 11: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

• Delta smelt

• Longfin smelt

• Chinook Salmon – winter, spring, fall and late fall

• Green and white sturgeon

• Central valley steelhead

• Sacramento splittail

• About 48 terrestrial species

Covered Species

Page 12: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Aquatic Conservation Measures Biological Goals& Objectives For

Covered Fish Species

Improve survival

Improve fitness

Improve distribution

Improve growth rate

Decrease mortality

Habitat RestorationConservation Actions

Phytoplankton andzooplankton (fish food)

Spawning and rearing

Other StressorsConservation Actions

Reduce contaminants

Reduce predation effects

Improve fish passage

Reduce Disease

Reduce non-natives

Water Operations Conservation Actions

Improve water quality

Reduce entrainment

Improve water flow and habitat conditions

Page 13: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Dual Conveyance Flow and Habitat Fundamentals

Dual Conveyance Flow and Habitat Fundamentals

East/west East/west flow patternflow pattern

1111

SWP PumpsSWP Pumps

CVP PumpsCVP PumpsCVP PumpsCVP Pumps

Ocean/TidalOcean/Tidal High salinityHigh salinityOcean/TidalOcean/Tidal High salinityHigh salinity

Habitat Habitat interactioninteraction

2222

Water Water reliability reliability and qualityand quality

3333

Page 14: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Draft Conservation Strategy – Major Elements

HabitatRestoration

• Up to 80,000 acres tidal marsh, riparian, and floodplain

• Enhanced floodplain in the Yolo Bypass-temporary inundation

• 20-40 linear miles channel restoration

Water Facilities &Operations

•North Delta diversion5 intakes15,000 cfs design

capacityTunnel/Pipeline subject

of focused study in BDCP

Minimum flows to ensure healthy habitat and water quality

Sacramento River flows are always greater than exports

Other Stressors

•Reduce methylmercury•Remove non-native

aquatic plants•Reduce illegal harvest•Establish hatchery and

genetic management plans

•Support Delta and longfin smelt propagation programs

•Reduce predators•Construct non-physical

barriers to re-direct juvenile salmonids

Page 15: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Draft Conversation Strategy - Flows

Inflow requirements

Outflow requirements and management of X2

Rio Vista Flow Requirements

Delta Cross Channel gate operations

Ratio between San Joaquin River inflow and South Delta exports

Old and Middle River flows

New North Delta diversion bypass flows

Water quality standards set forth in State Board rule D-1641

Preferential South Delta diversions

Page 16: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Channel Margin – 20 to 40 linear miles

Floodplain (new) – up to 10,000 acres

Tidal Marsh – up to 65,000 acres

Riparian – 5,000 acres

Floodplain (enhanced existing)

Potential Tunnel Conveyance

35 miles twin bore 33’ ID

8 miles single bore 23’ – 33’ ID

intake tunnel Forebay in the north with 750 acres of water surface area

+/- 150’ deep

5 Intakes between Freeport to Courtland

Potential Habitat Restoration

Page 17: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

• Five water intake facilities along the Sacramento River, between Freeport and Courtland

• Isolated Conveyance Facility (East/West/Tunnel)

• Through-Delta (armoring the Delta)

• Dual Conveyance System

BDCP Conveyance Options

Page 18: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Natural Communities & Terrestrial Species

• 48 Species for Coverage

• 70,000 acres tidal marsh/riparian restoration also supports 28 terrestrial species

• Propose approx. 45,000 additional acres

• Total Terrestrial Restoration Target approx 101,000 – 115,000 acres

Page 19: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Key Issues - Conservation Strategy

• Refine/determine proposed conservation measures.

– Effects of plan on biological resources, other scientific efforts

– Climate change

– Design aspects of conveyance (pipeline/canal)

• Metrics, monitoring and adaptive management

• Coordination with other conservation plans in the Delta

– Address conflicts between aquatic and terrestrial habitat restoration

Page 20: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Key Issues & Challenges

Regulatory assurances in light of scientificuncertainty

Cost and financing of conveyance, habitatrestoration, and other stressor measures

Limited control over other factors affecting fish species

By whom and how the plan would be implemented

Public support

Page 21: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Public Input & Schedule

• Delta Community Workshops Held in 2009– Technical focus on draft conservation strategy

• Ongoing Steering Committee Meetings- Open to the Public

• Ongoing Stakeholder Briefings– Local jurisdictions, Recreational interests, Water users,

Agriculture, Tribes, Environmental Justice communities

• Public Draft Conservation Plan – Fall 2010

Page 22: Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency

Environmental Review Process