SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY · 24/5/2016 · : Jeff Naff (Overaa), Conan Monson and Steve Beck (Stantec), Jim Coffelt, Les Rominger, Ron Fink, Tom Veurink, Jerry Jones, Claudia

SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY

AGENDA Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the

South Feather Water & Power Agency Board Room, 2310 Oro-Quincy Highway, Oroville, California

Tuesday; May 24, 2016; 2:00 P.M.

A. Roll Call B. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting on April 26, 2016 (Tab 1)

C. Approval of Checks/Warrants (Tab 2)

D. Public Participation Individuals will be given an opportunity to address the Board regarding matters within the Agency’s jurisdiction that are not scheduled on the agenda, although the Board cannot take action on any matter not on the agenda. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per speaker. An opportunity for comments on agenda items will be provided at the time they are discussed by the Board. Comments will be limited to five minutes per speaker per agenda item.

E. Staff Reports (Tab 3)

F. Directors’ Reports Directors may make brief announcements or reports for the purpose of providing information to the public or staff, or to schedule a matter for a future meeting. The Board cannot take action on any matter not on the agenda and will refrain from entering into discussion that would constitute action, direction or policy, until such time as the matter is placed on the agenda of a properly publicized and convened Board meeting.

G. Business – Sly Creek Dam Stability Analysis Agreement (Tab 4) Approval of a consulting services agreement with TERRA/GeoPentech Joint Venture for the preparation of an updated stability analysis report for Sly Creek Dam at a not-to-exceed cost of $49,900. Yellowhammer Drive Restoration Project (Tab 5) Approval of agreement with Duke Sherwood Contracting for the repair of damages to Yellowhammer Drive resulting from a water mainline break, at a cost of $19,024.

H. Closed Session – (Tab 6) Conference with Legal Counsel Anticipated Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(4)). Three potential cases.

I. Adjournment

271

MINUTES of the REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS of SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY

Tuesday, April 26, 2016, 2:00 P.M., Agency Board Room, 2310 Oro-Quincy Hwy., Oroville, California

DIRECTORS PRESENT: Jim Edwards, Tod Hickman, Lou Lodigiani, Dennis Moreland, John

Starr. STAFF PRESENT: Rick McCullough, Foreman; John Shipman, Treatment Superintendent;

Shawn Hayse, Special Projects Manager; Kyle Morgado, Water Resources Engineer; Dan Leon, Power Division Manager; Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager; Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager; Art Martinez, Manager of Information Systems; Dustin Cooper, Legal Counsel; Michael Glaze, General Manager.

OTHERS PRESENT: Jeff Naff (Overaa), Conan Monson and Steve Beck (Stantec), Jim

Coffelt, Les Rominger, Ron Fink, Tom Veurink, Jerry Jones, Claudia Knaus, Betty Lucas, John Lucas, Mitch Dion.

CALL TO ORDER President Lodigiani called the meeting to order at 1:57 p.m., and led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Hickman repeated his objections to the way the minutes are being written. Referencing an email he had received from Betty Lucas, he alleged that the audio of the last board meeting that was posted on the Agency’s website had been altered to exclude a portion of the meeting. Mr. Glaze stated that the audio had not been altered. M/S/C (Moreland/Starr) approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of March 22, 2016. Aye: Edwards, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr

No: Hickman PHASE 2 DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES – MRTP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The Overaa/Stantec design/build team, represented by Jeff Naff, Steve Beck and Conan Monson, presented an overview of its Phase 1 design/build work (project development services up to 65% of design) and summarized its Phase 2 proposal. Mr. Glaze stated that staff had reviewed the Phase 2 proposal and was recommending acceptance of the guaranteed maximum price (GMP). There was no public comment. M/S/C (Moreland/Edwards) accepting Overaa’s Phase 2 Design/Build Services Proposal

for the Miners Ranch Water Treatment Plant Improvement Project, including its $25,219,088 GMP; and, authorizing the General Manager to issue a Notice to Proceed to Overaa for said Phase 2 work, subject to final review by legal counsel.

Aye: Edwards, Hickman, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND WARRANTS M/S/C (Edwards/Moreland) approving the total General Fund and Joint Facilities

Operating Fund expenditures for the month of March 2016 in the amount of $1,400,040.87; approving Power Division expenditures for the month of March 2016 in the amount of $123,393.23; and, authorizing the transfer of $750,000 from the General Fund to the TCB Accounts Payable and Payroll Fund for the payment of regular operating expenses.

Aye: Edwards, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr Abstained: Hickman

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Ron Fink restated previous allegations that the Agency’s records were inaccurate regarding parcels that qualified for service under the Railroad Commission order. Les Rominger objected to the operational practices relating to initiation of the irrigation season on the Forbestown Ditch.

272

John Lucas expressed his opinions on the use of Agency credit cards and expenditure of Agency funds on Oroville-area economic development. FINANCE DIVISION MANAGER’S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Mr. Wong, including financial statements for the year ended March 2016. South Feather Relicensing Consulting Services No invoices were submitted this month by HDR for relicensing consulting services. Total payments to HDR for relicensing services rendered through February 20, 2016 amount to $5,140,760. The budget balance remaining under this agreement is $8,885. Workers Compensation premiums Risk Manager Scott Alcantara has advised that a 10% decrease in ACWA/JPIA workers compensation premiums will be in effect for 2016-17. This rate reduction will save the Agency approximately $20,000. 2015 Audit Auditors from Richardson and Co., CPAs, completed their field work in the Agency offices the week of March 28 through April 1, 2016, as scheduled. 2016 Supplemental Appropriation No. 2 The Kelly Ridge Powerhouse generator has been experiencing excessive vibration and run-out, possibly due to imbalance and misalignment of the rotating parts. As a result, the exciter for the generator has sustained accelerated wear on its brushes requiring frequent maintenance and outages. This supplemental appropriation for $10,000 provides funds for the acquisition of vibration testing equipment that Agency maintenance personnel will use to identify and correct the vibration and run-out problems at the power house. This equipment is compatible for use with the other three powerhouses, and has a 10-15 year life expectancy. Cost savings will be achieved by performing the repairs in-house, instead of retaining outside labor specialty services from PG&E or other companies. 2016 Supplemental Appropriation No. 3 A mainline break on Yellow Hammer Drive occurred on January 29, 2016. The damage included pavement erosion of the roadway. This Supplemental Appropriation for $22,000 provides funding for repairing and repaving the roadway. POWER DIVISION MANAGER’S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Mr. Leon, including reservoir levels and powerhouse operations and power revenue for the year ended March 2016. The season-to-date rainfall total measured at Forbestown on April 20 was 66 inches, and the five-year average rainfall total for this time of year is 52 inches. The monthly snow survey conducted by Agency personnel on March 28 showed an average of 52 inches of snow (unchanged from the February survey), and a Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) of approximately 25 inches of water. As of April 20, the snow pillow at the top of Pilot Peak (highest elevation in the watershed) indicated a SWE of 33 inches, which is 120% of normal, and 103% of the April 1 end-of-season average (a decrease of 11 inches from the previous report). The current water release from Little Grass Valley Reservoir (LGVR) is approximately 300 CFS.

Powerhouse Capacity MW

Availability Percent

Availability Hours

Generation Hours

Woodleaf 60.0 100 743 743 Forbestown 37.5 99.5 739 739 Kelly Ridge 11.0 99.1 736 736 Sly Creek 13.0 77.3 574 701

273

Kelly Ridge Powerhouse Turbine Shutoff Valve Replacement Agency personnel have reviewed the technical report from HDR that summarizes proposed tests to troubleshoot the closing problems with the new Dae Han (DHC) turbine shutoff valve (TSV) installed in October of 2015. Later this year, the Agency will proceed with its plan to test and diagnose the TSV with the assistance of HDR engineers and DHC staff, immediately following the annual maintenance outage in October for the Kelly Ridge powerhouse. The powerhouse continues to operate under a temporary release for service while the Agency pursues a long-term solution for the TSV. Sly Creek Access Road Embankment Failure The USFS has issued a hard closure notice stating that no pedestrians or vehicles are allowed to pass until further notice and has engaged their engineering and geotechnical staff to assess the nature of the road failure and develop a plan to perform repairs later this year. Annual Maintenance at Bangor Canal Outlet Station On March 30, routine annual maintenance was performed by Agency personnel on the Bangor Canal Outlet Station, located at the Miners Ranch Dam. The maintenance is required to ensure that the gate can operate to the fully closed position when necessary. The maintenance tasks include exercising the electric operator, inspecting the shaft and wall-mount bushings, inspecting the movable and stationary valve seats, and removal of debris and buildup. Agency Emergency Action Plan Exercise The Functional Exercise, which will take place on May 26, is performed every five years per FERC requirements, and will be attended by SFWPA personnel and staff from neighboring agencies. In preparation for the EAP Functional Exercise, a tabletop EAP exercise will be performed by the Agency on April 26. SPECIAL PROJECTS MANAGER’S REPORT The primary activity this past month on the Lost Creek Dam Improvement Project centred on the review and revision of numerous outstanding work plans requiring approval before on-site work can begin. The contractor, SMCI, began off-site work in the Oroville yard welding the pre-cast bridge deck components. The next phase of that activity involves pouring the concrete for the pre-cast sections. Site mobilization and preparation was scheduled to begin this month; however, this has been temporarily delayed until an analysis of the first season’s work is complete. Power Division crews have continued to successfully implement and maintain the Winter Operations Plan designed to prevent spilling at the dam, and there have been no spills to date. Work Suspension On March 29 a formal work suspension notice was issued to SMCI for all work until further notice, with the exception of the off-site welding. The notice was issued to address serious concerns regarding concrete test cylinders taken during the first season that did not achieve the strength required in the specifications. Further tests are currently underway to determine if the concrete will perform according to specifications. AECOM anticipates providing a detailed technical analysis on this matter by the end of April. Depending on the results of the investigation, some mitigation may be required. Both primary regulatory agencies (FERC and DSOD) must approve the results before authorization to continue with season-two work is provided. Finance / Change Orders There was a total of $123,970 in construction management and ancillary expenses since the last report. No pay requests were received from SMCI, and no funds were disbursed. Although 19 potential change orders remain under review, none were approved this month. WATER DIVISION MANAGER’S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Mr. Colwell. Water Treatment Operations MRTP treated water production for the month of March totaled 63 million gallons, which is 88 percent of average for the month. MRTP SCADA outage On April 7th, a planned plant shutdown was scheduled for the installation of new electrical circuit breakers to feed construction trailers. The power to the operations building was shut down at 0830 and, after approximately 20 minutes, the UPS battery back-up to the main virtual server ran

274

out of power and the server shut down. Power was restored at 0915 and the server started in a “service” mode, unable to return to normal service. This resulted in an extended unplanned SCADA outage that lasted over 12 hours. At 1330 the server was still nonoperational and the decision was made to run the plant manually, without any automation and without the ability to monitor any aspect of the process via the virtual server. A technician from the server hardware manufacturer in Sacramento was called out. The plant ran smoothly in manual for 20 minutes until raw-water pump #3’s motor failed. The virtual server issues were resolved at 2115 and the plant was restarted in auto mode. All plant automation and server functionality was restored and the plant has continued to run smoothly since then. Mr. Colwell commended alll personnel involved for maintaining a calm demeanor and working as a team to assure that customers were not affected by this inexplicable situation. Irrigation System Operations have basically focused on conveyance structure maintenance, including shotcrete applications on the North Ditch along Pinecrest Road and on the Palermo Canal near Oakvale Avenue. It is anticipated that Forbestown Ditch operations will commence the first week of May, subject to NYWD operations and Agency customer demands. The irrigation system’s current releases are: Forbestown Ditch SF 14 = 0.0 cfs NYWD = 0.0 cfs WD 6 = 0.0 cfs Bangor Canal SF 25 = 7.5 cfs Palermo Canal SF 30 = 7.3 cfs GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The Board reviewed a written report from Michael Glaze, General Manager. Property Owner Complaint Directors reviewed a letter addressed to the board, wherein Ms. Christine Hartman complained about a leak in the Palermo Canal and the “mud hole” it has created at the corner of her house. She alleges that her numerous phone calls to the Agency reporting the problem resulted in nothing being done. Water Division staff reported to Mr. Glaze that they “have been in there 2 or 3 times digging for leaks and recompacting the ditch banks and we have had reasonable success but there is still minor subbing. We thought it was solved.” The corner of Ms. Hartman’s house is six to eight feet downhill from the toe of the ditch. Today, a building permit would not be issued for a structure to be built that close to the ditch for this very reason. As of April 12, one week after Ms. Hartman’s letter was received, 150’ of the ditch, centered on the subbing area, was shaped and shotcreted by an Agency crew. Yuba County Water Agency’s Proposal to Divide the North Yuba Groundwater Subbasin The North Yuba Groundwater Subbasin underlies portions of both SFWPA and YCWA. YCWA has proposed subdividing this subbasin roughly along the Yuba/Butte county line. Unfortunately, their proposal includes a small portion within Butte County with parcels that are within SFWPA’s service boundary. Directors reviewed a letter sent earlier this month by Mr. Glaze to Yuba County Water Agency objecting to its proposal. GM Recruitment Process The application period for the forthcoming General Manager vacancy ended on April 1. Twenty-three applications were received. Four of the applications were determined not to meet the basic

275

recruitment criteria, and the remaining 19 were invited to participate in a writing project. Sixteen candidates completed and returned their essays by the deadline. Evaluation of the essays is ongoing, and the Recruitment Committee will soon be determining which applicants will move on to the initial interview process that will occur in May and June. The process is on schedule for final interviews to be conducted by the board prior to its regular meeting in July. DIRECTORS’ REPORTS Mr. Hickman repeated previously stated objections to the manner in which Mr. Glaze writes the minutes. He also alleged that Agency resources are being used inappropriately and for non-Agency purposes, and that Mr. Glaze has been working as the CEO of the Oroville Economic Alliance at the expense of the Agency. Mr. Lodigiani distributed copies of a letter he received from Mr. Fink after the February board meeting. Mr. Moreland encouraged participation in DWR’s forthcoming local Cast for Kids event. SB 1026 – RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT Directors reviewed a letter from attorney Andrew McClure of the Minasian Law Firm explaining their recommendation that SFWPA support Senator Jim Nielsen’s Senate Bill 1026, amending Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code. M/S/C (Starr/Edwards) adopting Resolution 16-04-01 calling upon members of the

California Senate and Assembly to protect the ability of water users to divert, use, and enjoy their water rights by supporting Senate Bill 1026.

Aye: Edwards, Hickman, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr MEETING MINUTES POLICY AMENDMENT Directors reviewed amendments to General Policy #340, “Minutes of Board of Directors Meetings,” as proposed by the board’s Policy Committee (Directors Edwards and Lodigiani). Mrs. Lucas asked that the proposed amendment be changed to specify the posting of audio recordings of a board meeting four weeks prior to the next regular meeting. M/S/C (Lodigiani/Edwards) approving the Policy Committee’s proposed amendments to

General Policy #340. Aye: Edwards, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr No: Hickman CAL FIRE CDC CREW AUTHORIZATION The brush needs to be cleared along a three-mile section of the SF14 access road, located off of La Porte Rd just above Woodleaf. In previous years, the Board approved hiring a Cal Fire/CDC Work Crew to perform this type of work along roads that are shared between the Agency and the general public. The crews are capable of performing a substantial amount of work in a short time, at a fraction of the amount it would cost the Agency to self-perform the same work. Their rate is $200 per day, per crew, which consists of 12-15 inmates. An application was submitted to Cal Fire with a request for consideration of the Agency’s project. If selected, the work would be scheduled for completion during the first available opportunity this coming summer. A copy of the Cal Fire Memorandum of Understanding was reviewed by directors. The total anticipated project cost would not exceed $2,000, and would not require a supplemental budget appropriation. M/S/C (Hickman/Moreland) approving the use of the Washington Ridge Conservation

Crew, under the direction of Cal Fire and the California Department of Corrections, to provide services related to brushing and maintenance along the designated access roads, and authorization for the General Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection for said services.

276

Aye: Edwards, Hickman, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr LAW ENFORCEMENT PATROL SERVICES – SLY CREEK RECREATION AREA On May 27, 2014, the Board approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Agency and the Butte County Sherriff’s Office (BCSO). The MOU was part of a strategy to address the concerning and, at times, unlawful activity at the Sly Creek Recreation Area (SCRA). The MOU consists of uniformed officers in marked vehicles patrolling the recreation area. A schedule with specific days and times is made available, and officers volunteer to fill the request. The presence of the officers made an immediate difference in undesirable activity during the 2014 recreation season, and the MOU was considered to be a success. Unfortunately, BCSO was unable to fulfill the Agency’s requests during the 2015 season as a result of a staffing deficiency, which resulted in a marked increase in problems in the recreation area. The County recently approved an increase in wages for the officers. As such, BCSO is actively moving toward a normal staffing level, and believe they will be able to fill the Agency’s requests for this coming recreation season. The increase in BCSO’s overhead costs will result in a 25% increase in the Agency’s cost to receive this service and, therefore, the need to amend the MOU to reflect this change. The MOU has no bearing on BCSO’s requirement to respond to emergency requests for law enforcement assistance at the SCRA. Directors reviewed copies of the MOU. M/S/C (Hickman/Moreland) approving the Amendment to the Memorandum of

Understanding Between Butte County Sheriff’s Office and South Feather Water and Power Agency for the provision of Law Enforcement Patrol Services at Sly Creek Recreation Area, at a not-to-exceed cost of $6,250 during any one year period.

Aye: Edwards, Hickman, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr OROVILLE ECONOMIC ALLIANCE’S INAUGURAL ANNUAL DINNER M/S/C (Lodigiani/Starr) approving the purchase of a table for eight for OEA’s annual

dinner. Aye: Edwards, Hickman, Lodigiani, Moreland, Starr Abstain: Hickman RECESS (4:49 p.m.) CLOSED SESSION (convened at 4:54 p.m.) –

Conference with Legal Counsel: Anticipated Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(d)(4)), three potential cases.

OPEN SESSION (reconvened at 5:03 p.m.) – President Lodigiani announced that legal counsel and staff were given direction during the closed session. ADJOURNMENT (5:03 p.m.) Michael C. Glaze, Secretary Lou Lodigiani, President


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager DATE: May 13, 2016 RE: Approval of Warrants and Checks Agenda Item for 5/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting April, 2016 General Fund and Joint Facilities Operating Fund expenditures are summarized as follows: Checks: 48115 to 48322 , $ 763,287.41 Payroll Expenses: $ 607,609.25 TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APRIL, 2016: $ 1,370,896.66 April, 2016 Power Division (“PG&E Legacy Projects”) expenditures are summarized as follows: Checks: 66996 to 66997 , $ 595.19 TOTAL POWER DIVISION EXPENDITURES FOR APRIL 2016: $ 595.19 At February 29, 2016, the authorized balance available was $650,288.43. Action to approve all expenditures:

“I move approval of the total General Fund and Joint Facilities Operating Fund expenditures for the month of April 2016 in the amount of $1,370,896.66; approval of Power Division expenditures for the month of April 2016 in the amount of $595.19; and, authorization for the transfer of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the TCB Accounts Payable and Payroll Fund for the payment of regular operating expenses.”

South Feather Water and Power Agency

Checks Paid, April, 2016

Date Check # Vendor Name Account Description Amount

04/08/2016 48115 A D P, Inc. 01-50-50201 Payroll processing PE 3/26/16 508.96

04/08/2016 48116 CalPERS 01-50-50413 PE 3/26/16 retirement contributions 38,323.60

04/08/2016 48117 CalPERS 457 Plan 01-00-22908 PE 3/26/16 employee 457 contributions 1,245.62

04/08/2016 48118 Lincoln Financial Group 01-00-22908 PE 3/26/16 employee 457 contributions 1,354.94

04/08/2016 48119 MassMutual Financial Group 01-00-22908 PE 3/26/16 employee 457 contributions 100.00

04/08/2016 48120 Moonlight Business Process Outsourcing 01-50-50114 UB statement processing, Mar 2016 cycles 5-10 1,427.51

04/08/2016 48121 Nationwide Retirement 01-00-22908 PE 3/26/16 employee 457 contributions 309.01

04/08/2016 48122 Reliance Standard Life 01-50-50402 April 2016 employee life insurance 1,020.08

04/08/2016 48123 Vantage Transfer Agents - 303705 01-00-22908 PE 3/26/16 employee 457 contributions 5,143.12

04/08/2016 48124 Better Deal Exchange 07-63-63100 Vac filters 27.07

04/08/2016 48125 Calif. Board of Equalization 01-53-53250 Electrical energy surcharge, 1st qtr 2016 57.03

04/08/2016 48126 CDW Government, Inc. 07-00-11202 Network upgrade to optical fiber at Pwr Div HQ 7,329.21

04/08/2016 48127 D and J Feed & Supply 07-64-64260 Bales of straw 64.44

04/08/2016 48128 Dish Network 07-60-60201 Satellite service, 4/8/16-5/7/16 46.00

04/08/2016 48129 Gentherm Global Power Technologies 07-00-11202 Thermal propane generator for LGV 6,629.78

04/08/2016 48130 Home Depot Credit Service 07-64-64260 Stakes, straw wattles 753.78

04/08/2016 48131 Industrial Power Products-Oroville 07-66-66100 Gas cans, saw bar oil 105.12

04/08/2016 48132 K-Gas, Inc. 07-66-66250 Power Div HQ propane 2,159.76

04/08/2016 48133 National Instruments 07-00-11185 Data acquisition test equipment 14,080.15

04/08/2016 48134 P G & E - Oroville 07-63-63250 Service 2/3/16 - 3/27/16, Power Division 7,609.27

04/08/2016 48135 Ray's General Hardware 07-00-11202 Plywook, screws, rollers 57.75

04/08/2016 48136 Riebes Auto Parts 07-66-66150 Radiator and heater hoses 127.34

04/08/2016 48137 Sacramento Bee 07-65-65225 Ads for campground hosts 450.00

04/08/2016 48138 Sierra Circuit Breakers LLC 07-63-63260 F3070 breaker for WPH 209.63

04/08/2016 48139 Staples Credit Plan 07-60-60106 Office supplies 240.74

04/08/2016 48140 Swagelok Northern California 07-63-63260 Material to repair WPH TSV control water cabinet 1,787.63

04/08/2016 48141 Trimark Associates, Inc. 07-63-63201 Calibrate CAISO meters at FPH 1,825.00

04/08/2016 48142 Wal-Mart Community 07-63-63100 Field supplies 41.27

04/08/2016 48143 ACWA/JPIA 01-52-52390 Employee fidelity program, 4/1/16-4/1/17 1,427.00

04/08/2016 48144 American Messaging 01-54-54251 Paging service, 4/1/16-6/30/16 52.28

04/08/2016 48145 AT&T 01-50-50251 Local calls, 3/19/16-4/18/16 611.73

04/08/2016 48146 AT&T Mobility 01-58-58251 Cell phone service, 2/19/16-3/18/16 584.16

04/08/2016 48147 Backflow Distributors, Inc. 01-55-55205 Test backflow, incl freight 111.87

04/08/2016 48148 Better Deal Exchange 01-53-53260 PVC conduits, primer, couplings elec tape, bushing 94.45

04/08/2016 48149 BioVir Laboratories, Inc. 01-53-5321 Water quality testing 1,185.00

04/08/2016 48150 Chadbourne Office Supply 01-53-53100 Printer cartridges, office supplies, paper 2,142.08

04/08/2016 48151 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 01-53-53260 Breaker 350.45

04/08/2016 48152 Dawn Cook 01-56-56394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 35.00

04/08/2016 48153 Dan's Electrical Supply 01-53-53260 Fuses, connectors, wire, barrel lugs, coupling, washers 479.74

04/08/2016 48154 Dish Network 01-50-50251 Satellite service, 4/8/16-5/7/16 88.67

04/08/2016 48155 Fastenal Company 01-54-54270 Philips and slot sets 38.69

04/08/2016 48156 Grainger Inc. 01-52-52102 Eyewash spray, hardhat cooling pad 292.04

04/08/2016 48157 Shawn Hayse 07-65-65394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 40.00

04/08/2016 48158 Home Depot Credit Service 01-53-53260 PVC conduits, elbows, couplings, adapters 152.47

04/08/2016 48159 Lake Oroville Area PUD 01-53-53250 MRTP sewer service 92.40

04/08/2016 48160 Mendes Supply Company 01-53-53100 Mop bucket, paper products 145.81

04/08/2016 48161 National Meter & Automation, Inc. 01-00-22300 5/8 meter with ert 10,664.00

04/08/2016 48162 Cory Nevers 01-54-54394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 40.00

04/08/2016 48163 Northern Safety Co. 01-52-52102 Safety glasses, goves, hard hat, vests, insect repellent 345.00

04/08/2016 48164 Orkin Pest Control 01-53-53201 March 2016 pest control service 82.00

04/08/2016 48165 Oroville Cable & Equipment Co. 01-56-56150 Hydraulic hoses, cutting tips, cut off wheels, flap discs 615.61

04/08/2016 48166 Riebes Auto Parts 01-56-56150 Shop towels, drain pans 47.27

04/08/2016 48167 Travis Small 01-53-53408 CalNev AWWA conference parking fee 21.00

04/08/2016 48168 Michael Stark 01-54-54394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 40.00

04/08/2016 48169 T & T Supplies 01-56-56274 Air blow gun, tire pressure gauge 72.83

04/08/2016 48170 Target Specialty Products 01-52-52408 Vegetation Management symposium 39.00

04/08/2016 48171 Vista Net, Inc. 07-60-60251 Webmonitor renewal, 3/15/16-3/14/17, internet filtering 3,100.54

04/08/2016 48172 Vulcan Materials Company 01-54-54104 Ballast CL-2 223.88

04/08/2016 48173 Wal-Mart Community 01-53-53260 Cleaning and kitchen supplies 102.16

04/08/2016 48174 Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC 01-54-54295 Roundup, Garlon, Competitor 2,774.85

Page 1 of 6




04/08/2016 48175 William Wong 01-50-50394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 40.00

04/08/2016 48176 Calif. Board of Equalization 01-00-22207 Consumer use tax, 2015 3,462.00

04/08/2016 48177 Itron 01-58-58360 Support agreement, 4/1/16-3/31/17 3,899.30

04/15/2016 48178 Access Information Management 01-50-50201 March 2016 shredding service 84.84

04/15/2016 48179 Advanced Document Concepts 01-50-50380 Adm Offices copier maintenance 206.81

04/15/2016 48180 AT&T Long Distance 07-60-60251 2/25/16-3/24/16 service 2,889.27

04/15/2016 48181 Bob's Concrete Pumping 01-54-54295 Shotcrete 4,820.00

04/15/2016 48182 Leroy Christophersen 01-58-58394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 40.00

04/15/2016 48183 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 01-53-53260 Transformer, wire, tape 1,548.48

04/15/2016 48184 Copy Center 01-52-52201 March 2016 UPS fees 152.97

04/15/2016 48185 Home Depot Credit Service 01-56-56100 Cleaning and garden supplies 47.58

04/15/2016 48186 Huntington's Sportsman 01-54-54295 Work boots, Broderson 190.07

04/15/2016 48187 Industrial Power Products-Oroville 01-56-56150 Sleeves for weedeaters 33.54

04/15/2016 48188 Knife River Construction 01-54-54104 Asphalt 854.59

04/15/2016 48189 Metal Works Supply 01-54-54104 Culverts 2,767.85

04/15/2016 48190 Occupational Health Dynamics 01-52-52201 Fit testing equipment calibration 760.00

04/15/2016 48191 Oroville Ford 01-56-56150 Brake pads, coolant hose 191.50

04/15/2016 48192 Ramos Oil Co., Inc. 01-56-56160 Mar 2016 fuel and diesel deliveries 4,415.70

04/15/2016 48193 Cheri Richter 01-50-50408 Tuition and course materials reimbursement 1,582.49

04/15/2016 48194 Riebes Auto Parts 01-56-56150 Floor mats 23.64

04/15/2016 48195 Sharp's Locksmithing 01-54-54104 Locks 206.94

04/15/2016 48196 John Shipman 01-53-53408 Conference expenses reimbursement 930.61

04/15/2016 48197 Staples Credit Plan 01-00-14404 Employee computer purchase 331.71

04/15/2016 48198 SWRCB Accounting Office 01-52-52501 LTD NPDES permit annual fee 2,037.00

04/15/2016 48199 Marcus Teer 01-00-14404 Employee computer purchase 3,783.74

04/15/2016 48200 Vista Net, Inc. 01-58-58100 Shoretel extension licenses 1,572.08

04/15/2016 48201 Wal-Mart Community 01-56-56100 Paper products, cleaning supplies 69.92

04/15/2016 48202 Advanced Document Concepts 07-60-60380 Mar 2016 copier maintenance, Power Division 204.50

04/15/2016 48203 All Metals Pipe & Supply 07-63-63260 Round alloy 16.48

04/15/2016 48204 All Road Communications 07-65-65251 Mar 2016 satellite phone, Sly Creek campgrounds 65.93

04/15/2016 48205 Allied Electronics, Inc. 07-63-63100 Test equipment material 263.35

04/15/2016 48206 AT&T 07-60-60251 KPH fiber connection, Apr 2016 service 1,621.72

04/15/2016 48207 Aviat U.S., Inc. 07-00-11202 Forbestown HQ radio upgrade 2,526.00

04/15/2016 48208 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 07-63-63260 Receptacles, gaskets, light fixtures, light bulbs 1,299.66

04/15/2016 48209 Copy Center 07-63-63201 UPS fees, Ewing Foley and Grainger 45.77

04/15/2016 48210 Employee Relations 07-65-65201 Pre-employment reports, campground hosts 66.10

04/15/2016 48211 Escheman Construction 07-64-64201 Trucking service, KPH trash rake 460.00

04/15/2016 48212 Hancock's Automotive 07-66-66150 Smog checks, 8 vehicles 352.00

04/15/2016 48213 Home Depot Credit Service 07-60-60370 Cleaning supplies 71.34

04/15/2016 48214 Hust Brothers Inc. 07-66-66150 Serpentine belt, cap screws 53.66

04/15/2016 48215 Martin Crane & Rigging 07-64-64201 Crane service, KPH trash rake, clean grizzlies 2,055.00

04/15/2016 48216 Dorinda Matney 07-63-63102 Employee work boots 166.61

04/15/2016 48217 Oroville Cable & Equipment Co. 07-66-66171 Ear plugs, tank rental 295.99

04/15/2016 48218 Oroville Ford 07-66-66150 Glow plugs, pins 120.48

04/15/2016 48219 P G & E - Sacramento 07-63-63501 Gen. Interconnection agreement for April, 2016 7,010.37

04/15/2016 48220 Ramos Oil Co., Inc. 07-66-66160 Fuel and diesel deliveries 3,295.14

04/15/2016 48221 Riebes Auto Parts 07-66-66150 Cylinder heads, filters, wiper blades, cap screws 996.65

04/15/2016 48222 Staples Credit Plan 07-60-60106 Office supplies, first aid supplies, printer cartridges 196.87

04/15/2016 48223 Talley Communications 07-00-11202 Ground plane Omni base station antenna 224.31

04/15/2016 48224 Wal-Mart Community 07-63-63100 Power Div office supplies 19.68

04/22/2016 48225 Jerry or Jeanne Riley 01-00-22200 Refund check 633.13

04/22/2016 48226 AT&T 07-66-66251 Local calls, 4/10/16-5/9/16 1,955.82

04/22/2016 48227 AT&T 07-60-60251 Circuits service, 4/10/16-5/9/16 278.95

04/22/2016 48228 Bank of America - Bank Card 07-63-63408 Hands on Relay Class lodging 721.46

04/22/2016 48229 Better Deal Exchange 07-63-63260 Pressure hoses, flow pistol, hose washers 25.28

04/22/2016 48230 Butte Co. Air Quality Mgmt. 07-64-64501 2016 Burn permit 23.75

04/22/2016 48231 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 07-63-63100 Ring term, light bulbs 565.73

04/22/2016 48232 F.E.R.C. 07-67-67501 Annual land fees 10/1/15-9/30/16 50,774.01

04/22/2016 48233 Hancock's Automotive 07-66-66150 Smog test T#109 44.00

04/22/2016 48234 Home Depot Credit Service 07-66-66370 Bug spray 12.87

Page 2 of 6




04/22/2016 48235 Hust Brothers Inc. 07-66-66150 Remover tool 27.81

04/22/2016 48236 Interstate Battery Sacramento Valley 07-64-64100 Deep cycle batteries 631.78

04/22/2016 48237 Daniel Leon 07-60-60102 Employee work boots 166.62

04/22/2016 48238 Minasian, Meith, Soares 07-00-11204 KPH TSV reinstallation 609.00

04/22/2016 48239 Mt. Shasta Spring Water 07-63-63100 Bottled water 101.35

04/22/2016 48240 Oroville Cable & Equipment Co. 07-66-66150 Speed sensor for T102 50.58

04/22/2016 48241 Petty Cash Reimbursement 07-67-67114 Postage, Recorder filing fee, safety mtg supplies, fuel 176.94

04/22/2016 48242 Ray's General Hardware 07-63-63100 Batteries, valve, handle 56.37

04/22/2016 48243 Riebes Auto Parts 07-66-66150 Brake away kits 27.93

04/22/2016 48244 Siemens Industry, Inc. 07-00-11202 Rugged switch w/fiber optic uplink 3,003.55

04/22/2016 48245 Swagelok Northern California 07-63-63260 Fittings for WPH TSV control water cabinet 26.64

04/22/2016 48246 Wal-Mart Community 07-63-63100 Wasp spray, batteries, office supplies 104.13

04/22/2016 48247 Western Renewable Energy Generation Inf. Sys. 07-63-63201 SREGIS for April 2016, KPH and SPH 69.70

04/22/2016 48248 All Metals Pipe & Supply 01-53-53260 U bolts, nuts, washers 14.50

04/22/2016 48249 AT&T 01-50-50251 Local calls, 4/10/16-5/9/16 2,315.75

04/22/2016 48250 AT&T 01-53-53251 Circuit billing, 4/5/16-5/4/16 427.98

04/22/2016 48251 AT&T Long Distance 01-53-53251 3/2/16-4/2/16 service 18.88

04/22/2016 48252 Bank of America - Bank Card 01-56-565100 Heater, agenda review 206.68

04/22/2016 48253 Better Deal Exchange 01-54-54104 Spray paint, gate valve, nuts, bolts, washers 142.83

04/22/2016 48254 Butte Co. Air Quality Mgmt. 01-52-52501 Gas & diesel operating pernits 1,046.80

04/22/2016 48255 C. Overaa & Co. 01-00-11204 MRTP Impr, services through 3/31/16 52,882.00

04/22/2016 48256 Dan's Electrical Supply 01-53-53260 Terminal rings, tape, bushings, lugs 37.01

04/22/2016 48257 Home Depot Credit Service 01-54-54104 Concrete mix, elastomastic sealant 219.10

04/22/2016 48258 Lincoln Financial Group 01-50-50201 401(a) plan maintenance fees 200.00

04/22/2016 48259 Robert Major 01-53-53394 Feb & Mar, 2016 health benefit reimbursement 70.00

04/22/2016 48260 Mathews Readymix, LLC 01-54-54295 Concrete 9,661.57

04/22/2016 48261 Mechanics Bank 01-00-11204 C Overaa MRTP Impr Proj escrow payment 2,483.00

04/22/2016 48262 Minasian, Meith, Soares 07-60-60208 March 2016 professional services 8,067.70

04/22/2016 48263 Northern Safety Co. 01-52-52102 Insect repellent, bandages, gloves 360.91

04/22/2016 48264 Oroville Ford 01-56-56150 Front brake calipers 267.20

04/22/2016 48265 Riebes Auto Parts 01-56-56150 Oil filters, hose clamps 83.03

04/22/2016 48266 SC-OR 01-53-53201 Lab analysis of TSS samples 30.00

04/22/2016 48267 Sierra Chemical Co. 01-53-53102 MRTP supplies 2,028.18

04/22/2016 48268 U S A Blue Book 01-53-53260 MRTP supplies 317.42

04/22/2016 48269 U.S. Bank 01-56-56370 Ice maker replacement for warehouse 2,311.85

04/22/2016 48270 Jessica Weidman 01-55-55394 March 2016 health benefit reimbursement 40.00

04/22/2016 48271 A D P, Inc. 01-50-50201 Payroll processing PE 4/9/16 992.14

04/22/2016 48272 CalPERS 01-50-50413 PE 4/9/16 retirement contributions 38,187.98

04/22/2016 48273 CalPERS 457 Plan 01-00-22908 PE 4/9/16 employee 457 contributions 1,261.67

04/22/2016 48274 Lincoln Financial Group 01-00-22908 PE 4/9/16 employee 457 contributions 1,290.74

04/22/2016 48275 MassMutual Financial Group 01-00-22908 PE 4/9/16 employee 457 contributions 100.00

04/22/2016 48276 Moonlight Business Process Outsourcing 01-50-50114 UB statement processing Apr 2016 cycles 1-2 1,550.13

04/22/2016 48277 Nationwide Retirement 01-00-22908 PE 4/9/16 employee 457 contributions 290.76

04/22/2016 48278 Vantage Transfer Agents - 303705 01-00-22908 PE 4/9/16 employee 457 contributions 3,811.41

04/29/2016 48279 City of Oroville 01-00-22200 Refund check 21.10

04/29/2016 48280 Mark Cobb 01-00-22200 Refund check 20.00

04/29/2016 48281 M C Madrigal 01-00-22200 Refund check 16.51

04/29/2016 48282 David Mc Bride 01-00-22200 Refund check 13.50

04/29/2016 48283 National EWP 01-00-22200 Refund check 884.60

04/29/2016 48284 Michael & Carrie Simmons 01-00-22200 Refund check 20.35

04/29/2016 48285 Derrick Stafford 01-00-22200 Refund check 667.89

04/29/2016 48286 Marlene Wendel 01-00-22200 Refund check 10.00

04/29/2016 48287 Advanced Document Concepts 01-50-50380 Mar 2016 copier maintenance, front counter 28.99

04/29/2016 48288 AT&T 01-50-50251 Local calls, 4/19/16-5/18/16 616.74

04/29/2016 48289 AT&T 01-50-50251 Circuit billing, 4/7/16-5/6/16 279.93

04/29/2016 48290 Bank of America - Bank Card 01-50-50225 Webinar 96.35

04/29/2016 48291 Better Deal Exchange 01-56-56370 Cooler pump, hand cleaner, PVC cement, impact driver 469.73

04/29/2016 48292 BioVir Laboratories, Inc. 01-53-53201 Water quality testing 350.00

04/29/2016 48293 BSK Associates 01-53-53201 BTP color package 20.00

Page 3 of 6




04/29/2016 48294 CDW Government, Inc. 01-00-14404 Employee computer purchase, computer supplies 2,435.65

04/29/2016 48295 Jeff Fridrich 01-54-54295 Work pants reimbursement 73.92

04/29/2016 48296 Home Depot Credit Service 01-56-56390 Mortar clay, cement, garden and cleaning supplies 815.26

04/29/2016 48297 Industrial Power Products-Oroville 01-56-56150 Bar scabbard, chain sprocket cover 27.65

04/29/2016 48298 Mathews Readymix, LLC 01-54-54295 Concrete 3,635.42

04/29/2016 48299 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 01-56-56100 Polyethylene bags 38.23

04/29/2016 48300 Mendes Supply Company 01-56-56100 Paper products 141.92

04/29/2016 48301 Merlot Marketing, Inc. 01-50-50201 Oct-Dec 2015 social media maintenance 3,500.00

04/29/2016 48302 Metal Works Supply 01-54-54295 Steel sheet cut in half 164.40

04/29/2016 48303 Oroville, City of 01-00-22907 March 2016 city utility tax collections 1,310.67

04/29/2016 48304 Paramex Screening Services 01-52-52226 DMV physical 59.00

04/29/2016 48305 R&B Company 01-00-22300 Backflow 4,556.66

04/29/2016 48306 Riebes Auto Parts 01-56-56150 Wiper blades 64.38

04/29/2016 48307 Tehama Tire Service, Inc. 01-56-56150 New tires 861.19

04/29/2016 48308 Vista Net, Inc. 01-58-58201 Full network backup, time sync 125.00

04/29/2016 48309 Vulcan Materials Company 01-54-54104 3/4" CL 2 base 88.01

04/29/2016 48310 Wal-Mart Community 01-56-56100 Paper products, cleaning supplies 43.66

04/29/2016 48311 Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC 01-54-54295 Roundup, Garlon, Competitor 1,827.24

04/29/2016 48312 California State 07-64-64501 2016 annual dam fees 169,758.00

04/29/2016 48313 Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 07-00-11202 Upgrade network to optical fiber at Pwr Div HQ 4,844.15

04/29/2016 48314 CMS Custom Machinery Solutions LLC 07-63-63270 Vibration testing equipment 4,980.00

04/29/2016 48315 NS Industries 07-63-63260 Brass tube plugs 320.76

04/29/2016 48316 Oroville Ford 07-66-66150 Rear hatch door switch 27.42

04/29/2016 48317 Riebes Auto Parts 07-66-66150 Battery, fog light 140.79

04/29/2016 48318 STB Electrical Test Equipment, Inc. 07-63-63201 Calibrate high voltage tester 128.18

04/29/2016 48319 Tehama Tire Service, Inc. 07-66-66150 Tires for T121 720.56

04/29/2016 48320 ACWA-JPIA 01-50-50400 May 2016 employee vision & dental insurance 8,639.02

04/29/2016 48321 ACWA-JPIA 01-50-50393 Jan-Mar 2016 workers compensation insurance 45,306.00

04/29/2016 48322 Cal PERS 01-50-50400 May 2016 employee heath insurance 136,837.93

Total April, 2016 checks 763,287.41

Page 4 of 6

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY

APRIL 2016

PAYROLL STATE & FED TAXES 213,055.70$

PAYROLL NET 394,553.55$

TOTAL APRIL, 2016 607,609.25$

PAYROLL

Page 5 of 6

Name or Company

Date Check # or Person Account Description Amount

04/15/2016 66996 P G & E - Sacramento 06-00-11204/2010-0828 Elec service for LCD batch plant 552.59

04/22/2016 66997 Petty Cash Reimbursement 06-00-11204/2010-0828 Postage, business meeting 42.60

Total April, 2016 Power Division Checks 595.19$

POWER DIVISION


Page 6 of 6


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Dan Leon, Power Division Manager DATE: May 18, 2016 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on agenda) May 24, 2016 Board of Directors Meeting Operations The Power Division Summary Report for April 2016, reservoir storage charts, and Forbestown precipitation chart are attached. The season-to-date rainfall total measured at Forbestown on May 18 is 69 inches (an increase of three inches from the previous report), and the five-year average rainfall total for this time of the year is 54 inches. The monthly snow survey conducted by Agency personnel on April 28 showed an average of 15 inches of snow (a decrease of 27 inches from the previous survey), and a Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) of approximately 8 inches of water. As of May 18, the snow pillow at the top of Pilot Peak (highest elevation in the watershed) indicated a SWE of 5 inches, which is 35% of normal, and 15% of the April 1 end-of-season average (a decrease of 28 inches from the previous report). The current water release from Little Grass Valley Reservoir (LGVR) is 60 to 65 CFS. Releases from the reservoir are being controlled to reach full capacity (5045.5 ft). Powerhouse availability for April 2016 is summarized in the table below:

Powerhouse Capacity MW

Availability Percent (Note

1) Availability

Hours (Note 1) Generation

Hours

Woodleaf 60.0 98.6 710 702 Forbestown 37.5 100 720 705 Kelly Ridge 11.0 97.9 705 709 Sly Creek 13.0 90.3 (Note 2) 650 (Note 2) 684

Notes: 1. Availability calculation is based upon powerhouse operating at full capacity. 2. Powerhouse was operated at reduced capacity during this period.

New Telecom Cabinet in Bunkhouse

Sly Creek Reservoir Boat Launch

Campground Operations Update Sly Creek and Strawberry campgrounds were opened to the public on May 6 following a successful annual inspection by the Forest Service. Aside from general winter maintenance and clean-up of downed trees, no major repairs were required. Three picnic tables and five fire rings were replaced as part of an annual program required by the FERC license. A full reservoir is already starting to attract quite a few campers and recreationists, although the closure of the Forest Service road beyond the boat launch facility will likely deter overall use as the summer progresses. The Forest Service has not yet indicated an opening date for the Little Grass Valley campgrounds.

Telecommunication Network Upgrade at Headquarters Facilities The existing telecommunication network system for the Headquarters outbuildings received major upgrades last month. The original communication circuits for the outbuildings had reached the end of service life and were no longer reliable, necessitating the upgrade. The overall telecom network supports computer networking and telephone services for the facilities. The upgrade project involved abandoning existing copper wiring, installing new optical fiber runs, and placing new telecom cabinets and receptacles in the maintenance shop, bunkhouse offices, and electrical shop. FERC Emergency Action Plan Exercises (EAP) In preparation for the upcoming FERC EAP Functional Exercise, a tabletop EAP exercise and meeting was conducted by Agency personnel on April 26, and was attended by representatives from neighboring water agencies, law enforcement offices, and other emergency response providers. The Functional Exercise, which is performed every five years per FERC requirements, will take place on May 26 and will likely involve more than 25 representatives from surrounding agencies.

Kelly Ridge Generator Rotating Exciter

Kelly Ridge Powerhouse Generator Exciter The hydro-generator at Kelly Ridge Powerhouse employs a rotating exciter system that functions to establish a magnetic field for the unit. The exciter, manufactured by Allis-Chalmers, was furnished with the original hydro-generator, and has been rebuilt several times since its commissioning in 1962. Over the past two years, maintenance expenses have increased sharply because the exciter has required more frequent rebuilding and replacement of commutator brushes, due to excessive vibration in the exciter assembly. An outage has been scheduled later this month to allow Agency generation electricians to assess the condition of the exciter system, and collaborate with management personnel to develop options for repairs or replacement.

Commutator

Brushes

2016

Release to SFFR Release to SFFR Release to Release to Maximum Elevation 5,045.50 Feet 3,530.00 Feet Below LGV Below Diversions Lost Creek Slate CreekEnd of Month Conditions

January 5,023.45 Feet 3,495.46 Feet 10.70 cfs 7.26 cfs 7.20 cfs 612.00 cfs

February 5,031.01 Feet 3,512.42 Feet 8.53 cfs 6.66 cfs 5.90 cfs 12.90 cfs

March 5,040.26 Feet 3,519.07 Feet 148.00 cfs 8.33 cfs 8.82 cfs 318.00 cfs

April 5,043.10 Feet 3,516.48 Feet 31.30 cfs 10.80 cfs 8.37 cfs 14.90 cfs

May Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

June Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

July Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

August Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

September Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

October Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

November Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

December Feet Feet cfs cfs cfs cfs

Forbestown

January 915.42 MWH 10,826.34 MWH 10,420.48 MWH 6,844.10 MWH $1,214,616.15February 4,124.82 MWH 26,787.37 MWH 7,332.04 MWH 7,034.10 MWH $1,447,969.08March 5,631.59 MWH 39,482.18 MWH 26,640.53 MWH 7,354.80 MWH $1,715,974.66April 6,248.66 MWH 38,360.27 MWH 23,697.47 MWH 7,146.82 MWH $1,863,077.70May MWH MWH MWH MWH

June MWH MWH MWH MWH

July MWH MWH MWH MWH

August MWH MWH MWH MWH

September MWH MWH MWH MWH

October MWH MWH MWH MWH

November MWH MWH MWH MWH

December MWH MWH MWH MWH

16,920.48 MWH 115,456.17 MWH 68,090.52 MWH 28,379.82 MWH $6,241,637.59

Powerhouse Operations

Woodleaf

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWERSOUTH FEATHER POWER PROJECT

Reservoir and Stream Operations

STREAM RELEASES

Energy Revenue

Sly CreekRESERVOIR ELEVATIONS

Little Grass Valley

Sly Creek Kelly Ridge

Restriction from 5047.00 feet for PMF

35,000

45,000

55,000

65,000

75,000

85,000

95,000

1/1 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 8/1 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/1

Acre

-feet

Sto

rage

Date

Little Grass Valley Storage

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

___________________________________________________________________________

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

1/1 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 8/1 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/1

Acre

-feet

Sto

rage

Date

Sly Creek Storage

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

0 0.04 0.04 0.55 1.116.5

21.34

42.2645.13

65.91 68.18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

Jul-1 Aug-1 Sep-1 Oct-1 Nov-1 Dec-1 Jan-1 Feb-1 Mar-1 Apr-1 May-1 Jun-1 Jul-1

Inch

es

South Feather Power Project - Forbestown Precipitation (Beginning July 1)

97-98 - Record High (107")

95-Yr Average (63")

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

2014-2015

2015-2016 - (Current)

Cumulative aonthly Total


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager DATE: May 18, 2016 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on the agenda) 5/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting South Feather Relicensing Consulting Services No invoices have been submitted this month by HDR for relicensing consulting services. Total payments to HDR for relicensing services rendered through February 20, 2016 amount to $5,140,760. The budget balance remaining under this agreement is $8,885. 2015 Audit As previously reported, auditors from Richardson and Co. have completed their field work in the Agency’s offices. The Agency’s balance sheets will include for the first time Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68 pension liability calculations. The amount of the liability is determined by CalPERS, became available to the Agency on May 2, and has been included in the report. It is anticipated the audit and annual financial statements will be on next month’s agenda. 2016 Supplemental Appropriation No. 4 As reported by Water Division Manager Matt Colwell last month, the motor for raw-water pump #3 at MRTP failed in April. The motor has now been rebuilt and the pump is back in service. This supplemental appropriation of $14,000 appropriates adequate funds for the repair of this motor. Miners Ranch Treatment Plant Improvement Project – Financing A Request for Proposals (RFP) for bond underwriting services was distributed on May 2, 2016. The submittal deadline is 4:00 pm on May 20. The bond underwriter is the initial purchaser of the bonds that the Agency will issue with the intent to resell the bonds to investors. The proposals will be evaluated on experience, staff qualifications, approach to the engagement (including incorporating the design-build, Construction Management at Risk method of project delivery and recognition of the existing 2012 Refunding Bonds), the marketing plan and the underwriter’s discount, or the spread between the price paid to the Agency for the bonds and the price at which the bonds are resold to investors. The Agency’s financial advisors for this financing, First Southwest, a division of Hilltop Securities assisted with preparation of the RFP and will also help with the underwriter selection. At this time, the other members of the financing team are the legal firms of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, serving as bond counsel and Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, serving as disclosure counsel.


Joint Facilities Operating Fund Financial Report

May 24, 2016 Board Meeting

2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET THRU 4/30/16

REVENUE:41150 Sale of Electricity 14,387,050 11,804,137 11,278,062 13,600,000 5,663,445

41502 Water Sales 380,985 315,744 7,431,740 200,000 0

42305 Current Service Charges 9,581 8,860 10,302 9,000 3,077

42331 Concession Income 22,154 23,967 20,602 20,000 0

49250 Interest Income 57,128 60,914 71,807 60,000 0

49321 State of CA, DWR 0 4,472 0 0 0

49929 Miscellaneous Income 165,039 6,896 10,894 1,000 0

Total Revenue 15,021,937 12,224,990 18,823,407 13,890,000 5,666,522

EXPENSES:JFOF Administration, 7-60

Salaries & Benefits 806,720 952,508 739,378 676,800 217,572

Supplies 9,990 26,131 7,302 10,250 2,347

Services 294,323 272,882 150,812 134,950 21,154

Utilities 25,800 40,019 49,807 40,400 13,824

Fuel, Oil, Auto 0 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 43,061 23,641 33,004 38,150 31,375

Total JFOF Administration, 7-60 1,179,894 1,315,181 980,303 900,550 286,272

Environ Health & Safety, 7-62


Supplies 19,086 6,841 13,401 29,100 1,350

Services 7,399 15,396 169,039 187,000 1,230

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 438 2,903 22,700 23,750 310

Total Environ Health & Safety, 7-62 99,461 99,404 280,270 321,350 27,321

Power Plant Operations, 7-63

Salaries & Benefits 2,421,103 2,319,980 2,255,969 2,204,550 759,586

Supplies 140,163 39,026 105,142 126,500 36,837

Services 219,031 325,818 167,101 292,000 40,942

Utilities 31,915 36,997 55,908 81,250 13,847

Training/Dues 11,859 16,617 6,118 26,000 1,966

Total Power Plant Operations, 7-63 2,824,071 2,738,438 2,590,238 2,730,300 853,178

Water Collection, 7-64


Supplies 47,376 37,409 39,186 47,850 9,348

Services 265,668 188,150 208,582 395,500 183,957

Utilities 6,117 5,411 4,332 7,500 0


Training/Dues 407 1,279 0 1,450 0

Total Water Collection, 7-64 619,024 570,026 605,995 778,800 324,104

JFOF Page 1 of 3




2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL


EXPENSES (CON'T):Campgrounds, 7-65


Supplies 3,700 8,893 5,594 16,515 2,018

Services 7,632 7,081 4,250 11,000 1,966

Utilities 4,760 7,186 6,192 7,000 198

Fuel, Oil, Auto 159 150 0 500 0

Training/Dues 0 12,728 8,158 1,100 720

Total Campgrounds, 7-65 95,550 167,748 81,639 104,795 10,363

JFOF Plant & Shop, 7-66


Supplies 38,400 23,208 14,473 38,300 3,159

Services 123,622 28,956 27,050 37,000 4,587

Utilities 58,660 58,361 60,802 64,000 22,534

Fuel, Oil, Auto 103,352 91,464 86,550 116,000 22,520

Training/Dues 0 0 0 500 0

Total JFOF Plant & Shop, 7-66 636,825 435,913 533,414 712,800 162,979

Regulatory Compliance, 7-67


Supplies 1,468 109 901 700 75

Services 346,178 335,580 328,790 493,000 51,613

Utilities 117 0 0 0 0

Training/Dues 8,577 3,770 3,729 11,050 1,144

Total Regulatory Compliance, 7-67 440,901 403,007 506,420 698,350 107,815

Communications & IT, 7-68


Supplies 15,447 32,245 18,725 49,000 1,482

Services 27,657 26,267 21,492 33,250 9,237

Utilities 8,980 753 1,647 7,500 91

Training/Dues 1,827 3,607 5,785 9,000 0

Total Comm & IT, 7-68 246,127 239,653 269,937 322,750 97,278

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 6,141,853 5,969,370 5,848,216 6,569,695 1,869,310

SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP 8,880,084 6,255,620 12,975,191 7,320,305 3,797,212

JFOF Page 2 of 3




2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL


Other Non-Operating Expenses:

North Yuba Water District (709,000) (709,000) (709,000) (709,000) 0

Interest Expense (25,537) (26,291) (90,602) (150,000) (40,863)

Captial Outlay2016-0815 SFPP Vehicle Replacements, Flat bed truck 90,000 0

2014-0839 MRC Wall Repairs, 2014 45,000 53,390

2014-0885 FPH RTU upgrade 28,000 23,258

2014-0890 VEEAM Backup system 18,500 17,919

2014-0893 KPH TSV reinstallation 200,000 11,501

2015-0899 Ponderosa Dam low level valve operators 750,000 15

2015-0903 Forbestown HQ Radio upgrade 50,000 18,781

2016-0906 Testing equipment 12,000 14,080

2016-0907 WPH station chargers & batteries 50,000 0

2016-0908 Update Preventative Maintenance server 12,000 0

2016-0909 Virtualization & offsite backup 22,000 0

2016-0156 Replacement SAN 15,000 0

2016-0910 SCADA replacement 150,000 0

2016-0911 Spectracomm Path align 20,000 0

2016-0912 Pwr Div optical fiber 15,000 13,073

2016-0913 Radio bridge for LGV downstream 4,000 3,569

2016-0914 LGV termal generator 10,000 6,630

Total Capital Outlay (1,606,247) (524,416) (716,977) (1,491,500) (162,216)

Transfers:

General Fund-Minimum Payment (709,000) (709,000) (709,000) (709,000) 0

General Fund-Relicensing (1,143,262) (1,143,261) (1,143,261) (1,143,261) 0

General Fund-Overhead (566,364) (590,304) (544,685) (600,000) 0

Net NYWD, Capital Outlay and Transfers (4,759,410) (3,702,272) (3,913,525) (4,802,761) (203,079)

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES 4,120,674 2,553,348 9,061,666 2,517,544 3,594,133

Beginning Balance 19,572,843 22,504,078 20,313,151 21,238,835 27,829,817

NYWD-Additional Payment (303,916) (2,139,677) 0 0 0

General Fund-Additional Payment (303,916) (2,139,677) 0 0 0

Loan Payable to PG&E (581,607) (464,921) (1,125,000) (6,600,000) (4,240,000)

Water Transfer Accomodation Fee to PG&E (420,000) (1,000,000) 0

Ending Balance 22,504,078 20,313,151 27,829,817 16,156,379 27,183,950

NOTE: Per NYWD agreement, 15% working capital reserve of $1,000,000, and $17,000,000

contingency reserve is required. Repayment to PG&E for loan for dam crest

modification projects estimated to be $23,000,000 ($12,352,623 paid thru 1/31/2016).

JFOF Page 3 of 3


General Fund Financial Report


2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL


REVENUE:

Water Sales Rev

41100 Domestic Water 2,394,442 2,115,926 2,172,247 2,000,000 550,904

41400 Irrigation Water 243,757 233,370 242,306 220,000 34,105

Sub-Total Water Sales Rev 2,638,199 2,349,296 2,414,553 2,220,000 585,009

Power Revenue

41305 Sly Cr Pwr Generation 1,446,062 1,309,517 980,584 1,375,000 570,089

41306 Surplus Wtr 172,809 137,487 104,982 75,000 0

Sub-Total Power Rev 1,618,871 1,447,004 1,085,566 1,450,000 570,089

Water Serv Chgs

42301 Sundry Billing (Job Orders) 11,451 22,865 41,429 1,000 0

Other Water Serv Charges 74,317 68,291 55,191 50,000 16,816

Sub-Total Water Serv Chgs 85,768 91,156 96,620 51,000 16,816

Non-Oper Revenue

49250 Interest Earnings 7,897 4,232 4,809 10,000 63,286

49311 Property Taxes 503,840 510,239 517,354 515,000 17,226

49405 ACWA/JPIA RPA 0 3,109 34,400 1,000 0

49625 Back Flow Installation 28,205 16,404 19,270 10,000 6,580

49630 Back Flow Inspection 95,984 97,886 106,460 95,000 36,836

Other Non-Oper Rev 29,331 13,905 16,702 15,000 333

Surplus From Debt Service Funds 212,603 0 0 0 0

Sub-Total Non-Oper Rev 877,860 645,775 698,995 646,000 124,261

TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 5,220,698 4,533,231 4,295,734 4,367,000 1,296,175

EXPENSES:

General Administration, 1-50

Salaries & Benefits 1,154,211 974,485 686,310 744,228 225,871

Supplies 39,768 51,415 53,954 60,000 15,147

Services 351,701 407,827 267,513 201,500 35,362

Utilities 51,012 59,303 75,941 75,500 18,511


Training/Dues 52,406 26,447 33,361 50,500 17,333

Total General Admin, 1-50 1,649,098 1,519,477 1,117,079 1,131,728 312,224

Water Source, 1-51

Source of Supply 14,113 12,976 13,213 13,200 5,582

Total Water Source, 1-51 14,113 12,976 13,213 13,200 5,582

Environ Health & Safety, 1-52


Supplies 16,529 19,436 13,757 20,500 2,677

Services 15,706 18,698 136,889 152,600 5,061

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0


Training/Dues 3,682 3,130 11,979 5,750 485

Total EH&S, 1-52 135,214 143,077 277,852 281,750 40,856

GF Page 1 of 3




2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL


EXPENSES (CON'T):

Water Treatment, 1-53


Supplies 126,881 151,027 82,114 135,900 21,899

Services 45,003 60,465 77,319 92,000 5,105

Utilities 64,670 54,115 47,158 63,000 5,046


Training/Dues 4,406 264 6,751 12,100 1,812

Total Water Treat, 1-53 1,109,796 1,186,225 1,139,272 1,265,295 399,994

Transmission & Distribution, 1-54

Salaries & Benefits 1,661,728 1,659,371 1,720,100 1,809,675 558,933

Supplies 102,387 147,620 90,284 120,500 42,019

Services 9,101 1,539 7,234 43,000 0

Utilities 32,863 38,875 35,593 42,000 4,105

Fuel, Oil, Auto 436 634 92 0 0

Training/Dues 1,921 2,442 1,736 3,500 1,199

Total Trans & Dist, 1-54 1,808,436 1,850,481 1,855,039 2,018,675 606,256

Customer Accounts, 1-55


Supplies 78,422 60,544 96,735 100,000 18,062

Services 9,452 22,374 23,604 10,000 2,241

Utilities 0 0 0 0 0


Total Cust Accts, 1-55 653,150 741,838 703,031 758,718 185,499

General Plant & Shop, 1-56


Supplies 22,938 31,750 14,281 52,200 9,649

Services 4,142 10,861 6,286 10,500 532

Utilities 27,839 29,467 31,528 30,000 3,687

Fuel, Oil, Auto 131,658 124,605 144,294 150,000 11,208


Total Gen Plant & Shop, 1-56 699,332 645,772 586,606 655,125 152,324

Sundry & Expense Credits, 1-57


Supplies 8,151 0 17,208 0 0

Services 0 9,157 7,228 0 0

Total Sundry, 1-57 14,516 16,271 30,685 5,000 2,861

Information Technology, 1-58


Supplies 42,141 19,574 15,922 28,000 1,190

Services 35,654 46,650 33,677 45,000 20,191

Utilities 251 1,963 4,023 4,200 462

Training/Dues 7,172 10,575 9,512 14,100 0

Total Info Tech, 1-58 333,127 335,737 318,679 354,989 106,711

Sly Creek Power Plant, 1-61


Supplies 3,866 11,358 12,340 49,850 4,270

Services 32,830 60,412 37,565 51,500 3,227

Utilities 8,914 13,099 26,629 14,700 3,608

Training/Dues 0 0 0 2,000 0

Total Sly Creek Power Plant, 1-61 197,832 479,519 489,260 523,150 73,310

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 6,614,614 6,931,373 6,530,716 7,007,630 1,885,617

GF Page 2 of 3




2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL


SUB-TOTAL, REVENUES OVER OPER EXP (1,393,916) (2,398,142) (2,234,982) (2,640,630) (589,442)

Debt Service, 1-59

Supplies & Servces 1,527 0 0 1,000 0

Interest 82,973 75,789 67,679 69,755 15,876

Principal 364,354 298,280 309,904 309,917 0

Debt Service, 1-59 448,854 374,069 377,583 380,672 15,876

Other Non-Operating Expenses:

Captial Outlay:2016-0053 WT-Minor Projects 0 0

2016-0054 TD-Minor Projects 0 0

2016-0056 GP-Vehicle Replacements, PU truck, distribution foreman 35,000 30,183

2016-0057 GP-Minor Projects 0 0

2016-0058 IT-Minor Projects 0 0

2012-0126 Shop HVAC 20,000 0

2014-0140 Warehouse Comm Room 4,500 75

2015-0143 WT Telemetry upgrade 10,000 3,728

2015-0144 Lwr Forbestown Ditch Improvement 50,000 0

2016-0149 WT-MRTP color printer 2,000 1,645

2016-0150 TD-North Ditch Lincoln bypass 40,000 0

2016-0151 TD_Dog Ranch Palermo 10,000 0

2016-0152 TD-Hydro-pneumatic tank 20,000 0

2016-0153 TD-Jack Hill pipeline replacement 250,000 0

2016-0154 TD-Shotcrete Pinecrest 35,000 0

2016-0155 GP-Copier replacement, warehouse 2,800 0

2016-0156 IT-Replacement SAN 15,000 0

2016-0157 GP-Adm offices copier replacement 12,000 8,932

2016-0904 SPH penstock corrosion mitigation 100,000 0

2016-0905 SPH oil vapor recovery system 10,000 0

Total Capital Outlay 266,864 249,205 260,061 616,300 44,563

Transfers:

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Minimum Payment 709,000 709,000 709,000 709,000 0

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Additional Payment 303,916 2,139,677 0 0 0

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Relicensing 1,143,262 1,143,261 1,143,261 1,145,000 0

SFPP Jt Facil Oper Fd-Overhead 566,364 590,304 544,685 600,000 0

Net Debt Service, Capital Outlay and Transfers 2,006,824 3,958,968 1,759,302 1,457,028 (60,439)

NET REVENUE OVER EXPENSES 612,908 1,560,826 (475,680) (1,183,602) (649,881)

Beginning Balance (358,906) 254,002 1,814,828 981,911 1,339,148

Ending Balance 254,002 1,814,828 1,339,148 (201,691) 689,267

GF Page 3 of 3

South Feather Water & Power Agency

Irrigation Water Accounting

For The Period Of 1/1/2016 - 4/30/2016

ACCT CODE DESCRIPTION REVENUE EXPENSES

2016-0504 Palermo Canal 8,820$ 106,116$

2016-0505 Bangor Canal 18,628$ 74,075$

2016-0506 Forbestown Canal 982$ 52,224$

2016-0507 Community Line 5,675$ 8,313$

Totals 34,105$ 240,728$

South Feather Water & Power Agency

System Capacity Fund Financial Report


2016

2013 2014 2015 2016 ACTUAL


REVENUE:42341 System Capacity Charges 26,016 28,561 31,051 20,000 42,390

49250 Interest Income 3,360 5,878 7,860 2,000 0

Total Revenue 29,376 34,439 38,911 22,000 42,390

CAPITAL OUTLAY:2010-0105 Filters 12,195 0 0 0 0

2013-0135 MRTP Expansion/Improvement 13,365 4,151 360,925 3,340,000 474,578

2013-0136 MRTP Control System 20,612 123,301 5,064 0 0

Total Expenses 46,172 127,452 365,989 3,340,000 474,578

Net Revenue over Expenses (16,796) (93,013) (327,078) (3,318,000) (432,188)

Beginning Balance 1,689,279 1,672,483 1,579,470 369,370 1,252,392

Ending Balance 1,672,483 1,579,470 1,252,392 (2,948,630) 820,204

Irrig Page 1 of 1

SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY

SCHEDULE OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS

April 30, 2016

General Fund Cash and Savings Account 1,400,386$

Power Division/PGE Account 1,821,607

LAIF 14,682,552

CalTrust 1,282,889

Rabobank Money Market 1,008,668

Five Star Bank 1,030,002

Fixed Income portfolio Rate Purch Date Purch Price Face Value Maturity Mkt Value Est Ann Income

Cash 8,067 2$

Bank Baroda CD 0.600% 7/13/2015 240,000 240,000 7/13/2016 240,034 1,440

Boeing Cap Corp 2.125% 2/27/2013 249,298 238,000 8/15/2016 239,709 5,058

Proctor & Gamble 1.450% 3/22/2013 483,312 470,000 8/15/2016 471,156 6,815

PNC Funding Corp 2.700% 2/27/2013 246,944 232,000 9/19/2016 233,306 6,264

Safra Natl Bank CD 0.650% 10/27/2015 240,008 240,000 10/28/2016 240,046 1,560

First Bank PR CD 0.950% 11/12/2014 100,000 100,000 11/14/2016 100,171 950

Bank of India, New York 0.900% 12/29/2015 200,008 200,000 12/28/2016 200,348 1,800

Simon PPTY Group LP 2.800% 2/27/2013 248,969 234,000 1/30/2017 236,125 6,552

Eaglebank CD 0.850% 2/20/2015 240,008 240,000 2/21/2017 240,446 2,040

JP Morgan Chase Bank CD 0.950% 3/27/2015 240,008 240,000 3/27/2017 240,178 2,280

FNMA 0.600% 4/26/2016 240,350 240,000 4/20/2017 240,163 1,440

Oriental Bank CD 1.000% 11/3/2015 250,000 250,000 6/12/2017 250,142 2,500

American Comm Bank CD 1.000% 7/8/2015 240,008 240,000 7/10/2017 240,456 2,400

Compass Bank CD 1.300% 7/29/2015 240,008 240,000 7/31/2017 240,703 3,120

Capital One Bank CD 1.150% 9/23/2015 245,000 245,000 9/25/2017 245,938 2,818

Discover Bank CD 1.550% 10/10/2012 100,000 100,000 10/10/2017 101,098 1,550

Capital One Bank CD 1.350% 11/19/2014 200,008 200,000 11/20/2017 200,842 2,700

Ally Bank CD 1.150% 1/28/2016 240,008 240,000 1/29/2018 241,150 2,760

Bank of North Carolina CD 1.350% 8/28/2015 245,000 245,000 2/28/2018 245,149 3,308

United Bankers Bank CD 1.000% 2/29/2016 235,000 235,000 3/29/2018 235,642 2,350

Premier Business Bank CD 1.200% 9/24/2015 240,008 240,000 4/25/2018 241,620 2,880

Goldman Sachs CD 1.200% 5/29/2013 50,000 50,000 5/29/2018 50,035 600

American Express Federal Savings CD 1.650% 7/8/2015 240,000 240,000 7/9/2018 241,548 3,960

American Express Centurion Bank CD 2.000% 7/28/2014 98,614 97,000 8/1/2018 98,710 1,940

Sallie Mae Bank CD 1.800% 9/10/2014 240,000 240,000 9/10/2018 243,202 4,320

Key Bank CD 1.350% 10/29/2015 240,000 240,000 10/29/2018 242,592 3,240

Federal Farm Credit Bonds 1.270% 1/28/2016 250,000 250,000 1/28/2019 250,018 3,175

Goldman Sachs CD 1.650% 2/11/2015 150,000 150,000 2/11/2019 151,275 2,475

Community Bank of Texas CD 1.100% 3/16/2016 235,008 235,000 3/18/2019 235,900 2,585

Centrue Bank CD 1.100% 4/29/2016 240,008 240,000 4/29/2019 239,846 2,640

Total Fixed Income Portfolio 6,685,615 87,520$

1.31%

TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS AT 4/30/2016 27,911,719$

I certify that all investment actions have been made in full compliance with Policy #470- Investments, and that South Feather Water and Power

Agency will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months.

Submitted by: Steve Wong, Finance Division Manager

Cash Page 1 of 1


Power Sold By Month

Average

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Average

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010


Cumulative Power Purchases

All Powerhouses

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Average

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Consumption Report.2016 1 5/18/2016 3:07 PM

MINERS RANCH TREATMENT PLANT CONSUMPTION: 2007 - 2016Volume

Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20161 6,669 6,725 6,769 6,618 6,591 6,598 6,616 6,663 6,672 6,704 8.090 8.207 8.889 7.916 7.573 9.100 8.047 11.685 7.688 7.475 153,959$ 154,692$ 159,260$ 151,996$ 150,322$ 156,728$ 145,841$ 154,880$ 139,478$ 139,775$ 2 6,679 6,734 6,769 6,614 6,602 6,610 6,622 6,657 6,674 6,696 8.699 7.481 6.365 5.962 6.215 7.855 7.371 8.819 7.783 6.009 155,627$ 152,150$ 145,022$ 141,650$ 142,642$ 145,621$ 143,060$ 143,562$ 138,998$ 133,089$ 3 6,683 6,734 6,611 6,600 6,588 6,615 6,645 6,654 6,678 6,705 7.152 7.257 5.880 5.253 6.421 7.274 8.303 7.179 7.233 5.392 148,605$ 149,953$ 141,538$ 140,719$ 143,299$ 142,922$ 147,452$ 131,838$ 137,866$ 131,040$ 4 6,692 6,730 6,617 6,615 6,610 6,618 6,640 6,662 6,694 6,722 13.375 12.141 9.000 7.957 7.100 7.243 9.825 9.145 12.454 9.442 184,144$ 178,390$ 160,660$ 153,889$ 148,039$ 141,677$ 155,786$ 144,600$ 158,886$ 147,149$ 5 6,696 6,732 6,618 6,623 6,596 6,635 6,661 6,671 6,688 14.079 22.608 18.122 9.442 11.917 11.881 20.637 18.218 12.981 187,560$ 235,151$ 210,095$ 162,323$ 175,915$ 165,658$ 207,047$ 180,746$ 163,157$ 6 6,729 6,739 6,614 6,619 6,616 6,645 6,665 6,675 6,706 31.806 26.294 21.423 17.553 13.938 26.923 29.751 26.090 17.071 276,121$ 254,186$ 228,845$ 207,800$ 186,242$ 236,470$ 248,329$ 211,696$ 177,192$ 7 6,704 6,723 6,613 6,626 6,620 6,641 6,665 6,692 6,704 32.093 32.619 31.394 29.635 28.752 31.456 30.060 29.446 25.388 284,092$ 286,867$ 279,461$ 271,282$ 266,205$ 256,107$ 249,809$ 225,054$ 209,770$ 8 6,711 6,744 6,616 6,625 6,624 6,638 6,659 6,669 6,700 32.652 34.451 33.753 31.050 26.332 31.710 34.498 31.650 22.821 285,480$ 296,155$ 290,613$ 277,308$ 252,930$ 257,040$ 269,306$ 233,688$ 201,114$ 9 6,715 6,742 6,618 6,625 6,630 6,632 6,646 6,674 6,713 38.006 32.202 30.758 31.253 35.886 34.846 31.743 25.815 22.293 310,005$ 285,155$ 275,714$ 277,684$ 299,122$ 271,217$ 258,211$ 211,713$ 198,445$

10 6,722 6,752 6,624 6,622 6,619 6,616 6,658 6,686 5,849 18.185 22.185 23.476 23.822 21.347 23.044 19.656 20.407 19.454 209,278$ 233,964$ 238,626$ 240,410$ 226,912$ 217,820$ 202,724$ 190,447$ 186,935$ 11 6,720 6,772 6,611 6,625 6,624 6,638 6,665 6,683 6,705 14.494 15.691 12.593 11.793 11.603 15.891 19.747 12.163 12.665 191,507$ 198,159$ 179,613$ 175,699$ 174,272$ 184,789$ 202,843$ 157,653$ 159,980$ 12 6,726 6,772 6,618 6,607 6,621 6,618 6,661 6,674 6,698 9.550 7.913 7.865 7.223 8.059 7.080 9.959 7.321 6.936 162,949$ 154,678$ 153,027$ 148,725$ 153,888$ 141,840$ 156,771$ 137,748$ 137,202$

6,704 6,742 6,625 6,618 6,612 6,625 6,650 6,672 6,623 6,707 228.180 229.048 209.518 188.859 185.142 214.303 229.597 207.939 174.767 28.318 2,549,327$ 2,579,501$ 2,462,475$ 2,349,484$ 2,319,787$ 2,317,887$ 2,387,178$ 2,123,626$ 2,009,022$ 551,053$

(x 1,000,000 cf)

Totals

RevenueCustomers

Averages Totals

(x 1,000,000 cf)

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

35.000

40.000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet

x 1,

000,

000

Month

VOLUME

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$-

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

REVENUE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


BANGOR TREATMENT PLANT CONSUMPTION: 2007 - 2016

Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20161 23 23 22 23 22 22 21 21 24 24 11.8 12.7 12.6 12.7 13.5 29.3 10.8 35.1 27.9 28.7 386$ 402$ 396$ 431$ 423$ 518$ 378$ 469$ 482$ 484$ 2 23 23 22 23 22 22 21 22 25 24 18.2 10.4 8.5 9.7 14.6 38.0 10.5 29.1 22.1 12.2 427$ 387$ 370$ 412$ 429$ 537$ 377$ 458$ 463$ 416$ 3 23 23 20 23 22 22 21 22 24 25 12.9 15.5 8.9 10.0 15.5 22.0 17.3 10.2 19.5 20.8 394$ 420$ 363$ 414$ 435$ 453$ 413$ 379$ 443$ 467$ 4 23 23 20 23 22 26 21 22 23 24 35.5 17.4 12.9 14.1 17.5 22.4 21.4 32.1 37.5 26.7 503$ 432$ 388$ 441$ 448$ 455$ 434$ 471$ 508$ 477$ 5 23 23 20 23 22 22 21 22 23 52.2 35.1 30.1 15.8 22.1 25.9 36.3 35.6 35.1 586$ 546$ 498$ 451$ 477$ 473$ 513$ 486$ 497$ 6 23 23 22 23 22 22 21 22 23 90.6 62.7 47.5 21.7 34.0 68.1 67.5 67.5 54.1 754$ 699$ 630$ 489$ 554$ 692$ 669$ 619$ 566$ 7 23 24 23 23 22 22 21 23 23 79.9 79.0 111.9 73.7 60.9 87.8 89.7 101.9 75.3 799$ 814$ 969$ 816$ 726$ 781$ 758$ 758$ 645$ 8 23 22 23 25 22 23 20 23 23 116.7 96.4 94.2 98.8 94.3 70.1 82.7 87.4 88.1 948$ 855$ 905$ 982$ 882$ 717$ 726$ 698$ 700$ 9 23 22 23 24 22 23 20 23 23 105.0 99.9 91.8 86.6 104.4 90.8 85.2 79.9 67.9 913$ 876$ 893$ 888$ 953$ 820$ 734$ 671$ 624$

10 23 22 23 22 22 21 20 23 23 46.0 61.2 53.2 56.3 74.9 61.3 52.4 73.9 75.3 615$ 699$ 683$ 696$ 810$ 642$ 584$ 653$ 650$ 11 23 23 23 22 22 19 21 23 24 24.8 32.2 28.5 31.0 49.1 37.4 48.8 103.5 44.3 480$ 521$ 533$ 534$ 650$ 489$ 580$ 733$ 552$ 12 23 22 23 22 22 20 21 23 23 14.2 10.7 14.4 14.6 37.3 9.8 33.4 23.0 17.1 411$ 384$ 443$ 429$ 575$ 358$ 498$ 448$ 420$

23 23 22 23 22 22 21 22 23 24 607.8 533.1 514.5 444.9 538.2 563.0 556.0 679.2 564.4 88.4 7,217$ 7,034$ 7,070$ 6,983$ 7,362$ 6,935$ 6,664$ 6,841$ 6,551$ 1,843$

Volume(x 1,000 cf)

Totals TotalsAverages

Customers Revenue

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet

x 1,

000

Month

VOLUME

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

REVENUE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


COMMUNITY LINE WATER CONSUMPTION: 2007 - 2016

Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20161 65 66 66 66 66 68 71 70 71 71 80.9 130.0 135.7 142.9 170.6 322.0 110.1 872.0 194.2 240.8 1,207$ 1,289$ 1,295$ 1,302$ 1,331$ 1,518$ 1,333$ 1,981$ 1,411$ 1,451$ 2 63 64 65 65 68 68 70 70 70 71 127.8 102.3 130.6 69.8 106.3 404.9 173.9 305.7 159.1 221.4 1,234$ 1,225$ 1,272$ 1,209$ 1,296$ 1,580$ 1,393$ 1,490$ 1,345$ 1,434$ 3 65 66 65 65 67 69 70 71 69 73 82.6 100.0 91.9 37.4 104.4 187.0 131.9 180.9 178.7 144.5 1,211$ 1,258$ 1,232$ 1,176$ 1,280$ 1,388$ 1,352$ 1,399$ 1,362$ 1,384$ 4 66 65 66 65 67 69 70 71 70 73 189.3 193.1 126.7 125.4 105.1 238.1 174.4 198.3 567.5 146.7 1,344$ 1,336$ 1,274$ 1,267$ 1,281$ 1,425$ 1,393$ 1,403$ 1,717$ 1,405$ 5 66 67 68 64 69 69 71 71 71 308.7 1,132.6 571.1 155.7 208.9 250.8 885.2 1,136.9 1,338.2 1,473$ 2,308$ 1,764$ 1,280$ 1,423$ 1,442$ 2,096$ 2,221$ 2,403$ 6 69 68 71 67 70 71 73 73 72 1,664.0 1,950.8 1,361.4 528.2 603.8 1,371.3 1,944.1 2,799.6 1,728.1 2,921$ 3,199$ 2,609$ 1,717$ 1,834$ 2,564$ 3,152$ 3,705$ 2,758$ 7 68 68 71 69 73 73 74 73 74 1,917.6 2,700.7 2,980.0 3,240.1 1,932.3 2,181.8 1,814.4 2,086.6 2,839.6 3,165$ 3,972$ 4,312$ 4,545$ 3,268$ 3,381$ 3,044$ 3,074$ 3,751$ 8 68 68 71 70 74 74 74 73 75 2,508.1 2,852.6 2,800.1 2,958.5 2,224.4 2,706.8 2,352.4 2,887.0 2,214.4 3,773$ 4,128$ 4,127$ 4,272$ 3,574$ 3,904$ 3,563$ 3,775$ 3,232$ 9 69 68 71 71 72 74 73 73 78 2,988.4 2,757.6 2,403.5 3,913.4 2,939.1 2,678.5 2,305.6 3,128.0 3,187.6 4,265$ 4,030$ 3,718$ 5,273$ 4,279$ 3,877$ 3,500$ 3,990$ 4,094$

10 69 67 70 71 72 74 73 73 75 1,403.1 2,362.4 2,473.9 2,812.4 1,852.5 1,568.5 795.9 1,515.1 1,848.8 2,648$ 3,606$ 3,773$ 4,139$ 3,168$ 2,807$ 2,045$ 2,591$ 2,891$ 11 69 68 68 71 69 75 72 72 75 582.2 1,003.6 553.7 1,090.4 453.0 1,502.6 1,437.6 441.5 1,247.8 1,807$ 2,224$ 1,760$ 2,366$ 1,674$ 2,745$ 2,646$ 1,643$ 2,394$ 12 68 69 67 68 69 71 71 72 74 239.5 274.6 300.8 223.2 612.4 164.6 432.8 170.4 506.9 1,423$ 1,482$ 1,482$ 1,420$ 1,838$ 1,401$ 1,660$ 1,408$ 1,734$

67 67 68 68 70 71 72 72 73 72 12,092.2 15,560.3 13,929.4 15,297.4 11,312.7 13,576.9 12,558.4 15,722.2 16,010.8 753.3 26,471$ 30,058$ 28,619$ 29,967$ 26,247$ 28,033$ 27,176$ 28,679$ 29,093$ 5,675$ Totals

Customers Volume(x 1,000 cf)

TotalsAverages

Revenue

0.0

500.0

1,000.0

1,500.0

2,000.0

2,500.0

3,000.0

3,500.0

4,000.0

4,500.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet

x 1,

000

Month

VOLUME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$-

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

REVENUE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


FORBESTOWN DITCH WATER CONSUMPTION: 2007 - 2016

Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20161 6 7 7 7 11 9 10 13 10 12 73.7 74.6 76.5 96.9 38.0 74.4 73.7 118.6 43.5 66.3 196$ 215$ 217$ 238$ 239$ 244$ 225$ 301$ 206$ 224$ 2 6 7 7 7 10 9 10 13 11 11 66.5 66.5 67.3 67.4 1.1 67.3 66.8 111.9 74.2 66.8 196$ 214$ 214$ 215$ 176$ 243$ 225$ 304$ 271$ 230$ 3 5 8 20 7 11 9 10 13 13 10 149.4 74.4 73.9 72.9 38.2 72.7 73.9 112.0 112.3 73.1 179$ 232$ 214$ 213$ 240$ 242$ 225$ 295$ 295$ 207$ 4 7 7 7 7 11 13 11 13 19 16 123.0 101.9 88.3 72.7 50.5 71.3 78.0 126.9 318.9 178.7 267$ 245$ 231$ 215$ 271$ 260$ 249$ 311$ 471$ 357$ 5 14 13 16 8 12 18 39 43 21 253.4 531.3 430.5 115.2 172.8 211.7 1,426.6 1,232.1 339.5 552$ 454$ 746$ 292$ 422$ 488$ 1,963$ 1,703$ 593$ 6 30 28 34 24 29 51 59 64 53 896.1 1,664.7 1,597.5 773.1 862.5 1,526.7 2,056.1 2,023.9 1,213.8 1,581$ 1,532$ 2,597$ 1,466$ 1,654$ 2,224$ 2,855$ 2,734$ 1,640$ 7 36 30 36 31 33 63 61 69 60 1,583.2 1,725.4 2,038.1 1,822.5 1,746.5 2,301.1 1,985.6 2,224.4 1,630.8 1,888$ 3,393$ 3,066$ 2,831$ 2,757$ 3,122$ 2,793$ 2,987$ 2,216$ 8 37 36 35 33 34 65 63 69 65 1,810.4 2,299.0 1,590.0 2,022.6 2,215.2 2,237.8 2,217.9 2,494.9 2,142.3 2,014$ 2,178$ 2,628$ 3,053$ 3,286$ 3,093$ 3,042$ 3,228$ 2,762$ 9 37 36 35 33 34 65 64 45 66 1,772.5 2,042.9 1,878.6 1,945.5 2,126.9 2,374.3 2,463.5 2,152.8 2,222.0 2,035$ 2,131$ 2,989$ 2,997$ 3,203$ 3,249$ 3,326$ 2,663$ 2,901$

10 20 20 22 20 19 40 43 25 31 726.4 918.5 1,044.6 1,133.4 859.8 1,201.6 1,190.5 602.8 722.5 784$ 962$ 1,702$ 1,788$ 1,433$ 1,785$ 1,806$ 908$ 990$ 11 14 12 16 15 14 17 22 14 20 168.2 222.7 242.3 128.4 155.4 209.0 367.7 208.8 291.5 436$ 475$ 565$ 413$ 441$ 471$ 684$ 452$ 541$ 12 8 8 9 12 10 12 14 12 17 148.3 75.4 83.0 39.4 79.0 111.3 150.4 79.5 174.6 316$ 233$ 258$ 258$ 272$ 286$ 359$ 259$ 419$

29 27 30 25 27 50 55 33 32 12 7,771.2 9,797.4 9,210.6 8,289.9 8,346.0 10,459.3 12,150.8 11,488.7 9,285.8 384.9 10,445$ 12,264$ 15,428$ 13,978$ 14,393$ 15,707$ 17,753$ 16,146$ 13,305$ 1,017$

(x 1,000 cf)

TotalsTotalsAverages

Customers RevenueVolume

0.0

500.0

1,000.0

1,500.0

2,000.0

2,500.0

3,000.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet

x 1,

000

Month

VOLUME

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$-

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

REVENUE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


BANGOR CANAL WATER CONSUMPTION: 2007 - 2016

Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20161 159 163 173 175 173 180 181 209 214 216 724.20 842.00 948.91 993.91 851.48 1,449.67 916.02 2,330.39 1,136.63 1,241.78 3,620$ 3,806$ 4,086$ 4,158$ 3,992$ 4,675$ 3,936$ 5,566$ 4,580$ 4,750$ 2 157 158 164 168 172 182 178 205 210 211 669.71 631.89 818.69 671.99 755.38 1,564.82 791.83 2,026.03 1,093.56 1,358.09 3,556$ 3,541$ 3,835$ 3,759$ 3,915$ 4,799$ 3,790$ 5,275$ 4,529$ 4,767$ 3 160 160 164 168 166 179 176 209 218 211 645.28 620.43 674.56 651.87 783.17 1,002.97 862.55 1,294.22 1,451.72 1,185.55 3,513$ 3,525$ 3,637$ 3,698$ 3,799$ 4,184$ 3,807$ 4,614$ 4,842$ 4,603$ 4 171 173 179 171 165 191 193 216 228 222 1,176.41 1,402.61 909.53 814.60 804.62 1,120.73 1,316.49 2,006.90 3,195.17 1,249.00 4,332$ 4,559$ 4,102$ 3,901$ 3,817$ 4,311$ 4,516$ 5,400$ 6,655$ 4,805$ 5 198 213 215 188 190 210 238 245 258 2,877.85 5,377.98 3,817.34 1,190.88 1,544.43 1,575.54 4,811.61 4,365.91 4,568.56 6,556$ 9,335$ 7,720$ 4,614$ 5,009$ 5,058$ 8,605$ 7,922$ 8,306$ 6 223 217 229 213 215 237 250 267 266 13,677.09 8,852.45 6,589.73 3,287.34 3,286.44 7,498.68 9,201.05 7,678.85 6,961.48 18,261$ 13,123$ 10,921$ 7,278$ 7,301$ 11,217$ 13,057$ 11,227$ 10,585$ 7 227 230 229 232 226 244 259 276 270 14,958.77 10,229.44 9,009.45 10,161.09 8,363.15 10,117.22 9,556.34 9,165.64 10,198.52 19,641$ 16,476$ 13,476$ 14,717$ 12,739$ 13,813$ 13,500$ 12,607$ 13,433$ 8 227 226 239 236 238 255 259 273 272 18,647.25 11,273.23 9,695.74 9,718.66 9,352.24 10,506.24 10,284.58 10,106.26 9,011.07 23,465$ 15,758$ 14,358$ 14,331$ 13,949$ 14,353$ 14,191$ 13,384$ 12,444$ 9 227 235 238 234 238 257 255 274 274 17,226.77 10,452.92 9,406.75 10,033.50 11,001.37 11,321.96 9,585.02 9,439.48 9,300.34 22,473$ 15,090$ 14,060$ 14,637$ 15,684$ 15,205$ 13,514$ 12,817$ 12,761$

10 213 223 231 221 223 244 247 267 268 8,000.91 8,021.02 8,121.09 8,699.87 7,071.95 8,918.25 7,866.75 7,708.13 9,205.77 12,099$ 12,319$ 12,572$ 12,979$ 11,308$ 12,698$ 11,706$ 11,164$ 12,558$ 11 183 204 201 206 205 217 236 242 256 3,146.31 4,399.09 3,293.95 3,738.01 2,790.06 5,017.10 5,666.04 3,426.50 4,516.74 6,562$ 8,184$ 7,041$ 7,587$ 6,586$ 8,513$ 9,431$ 7,026$ 8,250$ 12 175 180 186 182 186 186 219 221 225 1,342.71 978.35 1,192.89 1,005.61 1,221.65 1,012.92 2,302.99 1,570.26 2,068.11 4,500$ 4,239$ 4,563$ 4,304$ 4,618$ 4,117$ 5,828$ 5,164$ 5,610$

193 199 204 200 200 215 224 242 247 215 83,093.25 63,081.42 54,478.63 50,967.33 47,825.93 61,106.09 63,161.29 61,118.57 62,707.67 5,034.40 128,578$ 109,955$ 100,370$ 95,962$ 92,717$ 102,941$ 105,882$ 102,165$ 104,553$ 18,924$ Averages Totals

Revenue

Totals

Volume(x 1,000 cf)

Customers

0.00

2,000.00

4,000.00

6,000.00

8,000.00

10,000.00

12,000.00

14,000.00

16,000.00

18,000.00

20,000.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet x

1,0

00

Month

VOLUME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

REVENUE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


PALERMO CANAL WATER CONSUMPTION: 2007 - 2016

Month 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20161 80 80 80 79 77 83 94 100 101 104 636.15 467.73 638.54 524.34 368.52 709.05 545.08 685.64 556.62 608.26 2,124$ 1,898$ 2,100$ 1,964$ 1,746$ 2,189$ 2,061$ 2,248$ 2,244$ 2,244$ 2 79 76 78 77 78 79 76 103 97 102 586.00 466.70 474.43 518.60 347.59 550.70 454.37 599.84 586.42 482.14 2,095$ 1,860$ 1,932$ 1,960$ 1,768$ 1,982$ 1,213$ 2,259$ 2,120$ 2,120$ 3 79 76 70 76 77 79 92 98 101 103 916.98 486.41 308.81 547.86 359.14 510.12 662.78 517.52 837.86 583.66 2,043$ 1,866$ 1,539$ 1,936$ 1,737$ 1,910$ 2,145$ 2,006$ 2,197$ 2,197$ 4 89 150 79 77 80 87 95 121 155 102 973.82 4,331.96 593.43 556.76 395.44 445.02 880.41 1,469.37 4,459.84 688.77 2,636$ 7,122$ 1,991$ 1,975$ 1,835$ 1,868$ 2,418$ 3,313$ 2,307$ 2,307$ 5 159 174 163 107 136 167 206 189 206 4,445.04 6,901.03 5,598.44 1,612.15 3,316.14 4,560.10 9,379.10 7,575.08 9,233.22 7,460$ 10,203$ 8,682$ 3,584$ 5,845$ 7,210$ 12,534$ 9,714$ 6 202 205 204 177 173 216 233 218 224 9,103.04 10,264.94 8,829.84 7,006.06 6,800.98 9,777.48 11,507.05 10,630.11 10,903.44 13,087$ 14,335$ 12,817$ 10,443$ 10,139$ 13,076$ 14,997$ 13,244$ 7 204 219 221 210 193 220 234 220 228 9,592.59 9,783.62 10,598.90 11,051.13 9,356.00 11,086.98 11,528.65 10,116.88 11,661.46 13,612$ 14,055$ 14,945$ 15,201$ 13,159$ 14,392$ 15,070$ 12,831$ 8 201 207 215 211 212 232 233 228 233 9,372.64 10,238.86 10,589.77 11,664.89 10,711.85 11,815.71 12,108.86 11,198.22 11,758.93 13,326$ 14,322$ 14,832$ 15,884$ 14,908$ 15,295$ 15,605$ 13,931$ 9 205 219 208 207 202 215 218 224 232 9,218.87 9,706.46 9,540.67 10,755.00 10,716.74 10,634.66 9,146.39 10,918.29 12,076.24 13,235$ 13,975$ 13,634$ 14,885$ 14,754$ 13,875$ 12,503$ 13,632$

10 144 163 164 184 140 196 181 190 209 2,900.42 5,106.18 4,388.30 7,141.06 2,895.79 7,008.34 4,958.05 5,278.09 6,546.06 5,544$ 8,194$ 7,480$ 10,683$ 5,502$ 10,055$ 7,808$ 7,973$ 11 109 112 95 90 89 109 112 107 114 1,168.79 1,441.04 794.98 514.52 684.82 1,051.66 1,261.65 956.55 1,024.45 3,128$ 3,498$ 2,562$ 2,150$ 2,311$ 2,800$ 3,050$ 2,651$ 12 85 90 82 81 81 97 97 104 107 594.79 632.75 501.08 405.46 551.69 675.15 634.91 529.28 656.68 2,111$ 2,251$ 1,992$ 1,862$ 2,035$ 2,234$ 2,205$ 2,155$

136 148 138 131 128 148 156 159 167 103 49,509.13 59,827.69 52,857.20 52,297.83 46,504.67 58,824.97 63,067.29 60,474.87 70,301.20 2,362.83 80,401$ 93,579$ 84,506$ 82,528$ 75,739$ 86,887$ 91,609$ 85,956$ 8,867$ 8,867$ Averages

Volume(x 1,000 cf)

Totals

Customers

Totals

Revenue

0.00

2,000.00

4,000.00

6,000.00

8,000.00

10,000.00

12,000.00

14,000.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cub

ic F

eet

x 1,

000

Month

VOLUME

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$-

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Month

REVENUE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Shawn Hayse, Special Projects Manager DATE: May 18, 2016 RE: Lost Creek Dam Improvement Project Update May 24, 2016 Board of Directors Meeting Summary SMCI continues to perform their off-site work on the fabrication and coating of steel girders for the bridge deck. The work-suspension order remains in effect for all other activities, and is discussed in further detail in the following section. AECOM is working with SMCI to review critical submittals and to address matters relating to the evaluation and analysis of concrete placed during the first season of construction. Work Suspension The work suspension notice issued on March 29 remains in effect while an analysis is performed on the concrete facing placed during the first season of construction. Multiple core samples were recently extracted from three of the four monoliths, and a full petrographic examination was performed on 12 samples. A final report on this analysis is expected by May 23. Based on preliminary findings, AECOM is working with SMCI to prepare a corrective action plan to address deficiencies in the concrete facing. A report will be submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Division of Safety of Dams detailing the deficiencies and the proposed mitigation, and seeking their authorization to proceed with construction. Schedule Assuming both regulatory agencies approve the proposed corrective action plan, on-site construction activity would resume during the first part of June. An updated schedule with a new project completion date will be provided once the work suspension notice has been withdrawn. SMCI is considering numerous scheduling alternatives that would allow for the most efficient completion of the project. As was originally

Figure 1: Steel Girders in the Oroville Yard

anticipated at bid time, it is likely that SMCI will require that a substantial portion of work be completed in the third season. Additional details will be given once a schedule update is provided and approved. Finance / Change Orders A total of $454,581 in construction management and ancillary expenses was disbursed this month. No funds were disbursed to SMCI. Nineteen potential change orders remain under review; no change orders were approved this month.

Upcoming Key Activities - Submit Season-1 concrete analysis - Work authorization (FERC/DSOD) - Complete steel girders

2016 Major Milestones - To be identified upon approval of work plan

Table 2: Potential Change Order Summary

Table 1: Finance Summary


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager DATE: May 19, 2016 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on the agenda) 5/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting Water Treatment Operations The MRTP treated water production for the month of April totaled 100.1 million gallons, which is 107 percent of average for the month (table at right). The chart at the end of this report provides a historical perspective of cumulative water demand and production and shows the 2015 January-through-April demand at 95% percent of recent average. The rebuilt Raw Water Motor #3 was installed on April 27th and has been operating satisfactorily. Irrigation System Irrigation System Irrigation system operations have shifted from maintenance to providing irrigation water for the 2016 season. The current irrigation operations are: Forbestown Ditch SF 14 = 21 cfs

NYWD = 14 cfs SFWPA @ WD 6 = 7 cfs Bangor Canal SF 25 = 8.5 cfs Palermo Canal SF30 = 13.2 cfs The Honcut Ditch is still not in service because reconstruction of the failed diversion structure cannot commence until after issuance of a California Department of Fish and Wildlife section 1602 permit for streambed alteration. Despite receiving notification from CDFW that a permit will be provided on or before August 8, 2016, I was reassured by CDFW staff that they will get to it as soon as possible and that vacation and workload schedules should allow for review and notification for completeness within the next couple of weeks. A final agreement will follow the notification for completeness.

Miners Ranch Production April 2016

Total (MG) 100.1 (107% of avg) High (MGD) 4.9 Low (MGD) 2.2 Avg. (MGD) 3.4

-50000

-25000

0

25000

50000

75000

100000

125000

150000

175000

200000

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

El

ectr

icity

Dem

and

(KW

H)

Wat

er D

eman

d (M

illio

n G

allo

ns)

Month

Miners Ranch Water Treatment Plant Monthly Water Production VS: KWH Purchased

MRTP Improvement Project Agency personnel have been coordinating and providing information to the Overaa/Stantec design-build team supporting the Phase II contract design. Significant team effort is being expended to finalize the design, equipment specifications, and construction drawings for the start of construction on the backwash and pretreatment solids-handling process. It is estimated that the construction surveying team will be on site May 23rd, and that excavating equipment mobilization will occur on May 31st. Solar Plant Production; MRTP power demand for April was less than the solar generation by 7,400 KWH. The graph below provides a historical perspective of energy demand (from PG&E) compared to water production.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

MIL

LIO

NS

OF

GAL

LON

S MRTP Total Annual Water Production

5 Year Avg Cummulative

1997 (max)

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Water Division Status Report Matt Colwell Water Division Manager

Minimum (2015)

Maximum (1997)

Average

2016


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: May 19, 2016 RE: General Information (regarding matters not scheduled on the agenda) 5/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting Audio Recording – March 2016 Board Meeting During last month’s board meeting it was alleged that portions of the audio recording of the previous month’s board meeting had been deleted – specifically, portions of Mr. Hickman’s director’s report. Art Martinez reviewed the recording on the Agency’s website. Mr. Hickman’s report begins at 01:00:15 of the recording and continues to 01:10:49. The items he discussed that Mrs. Lucas said were not on the recording began at 01:02:04 and lasted approximately eight minutes and 30 seconds. Mr. Martinez found no evidence that the recording had been tampered with. GM Recruitment Process The application period for the forthcoming General Manager vacancy ended on April 1. Twenty-three applications were received. Four of the applications were determined not to meet the basic recruitment criteria, and the remaining 19 were invited to participate in a writing project. Sixteen candidates completed and returned their essays by the deadline. Evaluation of the essays resulted in the Recruitment Committee selecting eight applicants to move on to the initial interview process that will occur on June 14 and 15. The process is on schedule for final interviews to be conducted by the board prior to its regular meeting in July.


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Kyle Morgado, Water Resources Engineer DATE: May 24, 2016 RE: Sly Creek Dam Stability Analysis and Report Agenda Item for 6/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting In the 2013 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Part 12D inspection comments, FERC requested an updated Sly Creek Dam Stability Analysis to be completed by 2017. The Agency recently solicited bids for the required project and received the following eight proposals:

Terra/GeoPentech – $49,900 Fugro – $61,700 McMillen Jacobs – $74,700 GEI – $80,900 Sage – $85,000 Anatech – $88,000 AECOM – $89,200 Stantec – $160,000

Staff is recommending acceptance of the proposal submitted by Terra/GeoPentech on the basis of the firms’ experience with similar projects and low bid, providing the overall best value to the Agency. The recommended form of action is:

“I move approval of, and authorization for the General Manager to execute the consulting services agreement for the Sly Creek Dam Stability Analysis and Report with Terra/GeoPentech Joint Venture, for a total not-to-exceed contract price of $49,960.”

May 24, 2016 Consulting Services Agreement Page1 of 6

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of June 6, 2016 by TERRA/GeoPentech (“Consultant”) and South Feather Water and Power Agency (“Agency”). ARTICLE 1 SCOPE Consultant shall perform the Sly Creek Dam Seismic Stability Analysis (the “Services”) described generally in the Consultant’s Proposal dated April 28, 2016, attached hereto as Appendix A. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date shown above and shall remain in effect unless amended in writing or terminated pursuant to Article 8 herein. Agency may engage other consultants as Agency deems necessary to timely and efficiently carry out tasks required, and this Agreement shall not be considered an exclusive engagement by Agency of Consultant for Agency’s requirements. ARTICLE 2 COMPENSATION For performance of the Services, Agency shall pay Consultant a not to exceed price of $49,960.00. This compensation shall be paid to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of invoices submitted following completion of each of Tasks 1 through 7 as described in Consultant’s Proposal (Appendix A). Payment for Task 8, “Peer Review and FERC/DSOD Approval” shall be made within 30 days of receipt of invoice following notification of acceptance of the Sly Creek Dam Seismic Stability Analysis Report, but not later than April 30, 2018 if notification of acceptance has not yet been received. ARTICLE 3 REPRESENTATIVES Consultant shall function in cooperation with and subject always to the direction and control of Agency’s authorized officers or designated representatives. Consultant shall also designate a representative for the execution of the Services. Consultant’s and Agency’s representatives are: Consultant: Agency: TERRA/ GeoPentech South Feather Water and Power Agency Andrew Dinsick, P.E. Kyle Morgado, P.E. , Water Resources Engineer 350 Sansome Street, Suite 830 2310 Oro-Quincy Hwy. San Francisco, CA 94104 Oroville, CA 95966 Telephone: (714)796-9100 Telephone: (530) 538-8841 [email protected] [email protected] Additional contact information can be found under Article 15. ARTICLE 4 PERSONNEL All Consultant’s staff, and its subcontractors’ staff, assigned to these Services shall be approved by the Agency prior to their assignment to task activities. Consultant shall confirm that the technical qualifications of all personnel assigned to these tasks meet the applicable industry standards. In the event that the individuals who are initially assigned by Consultant to perform Services under this Agreement are removed, replaced or reassigned by Consultant, such removal, replacement or


reassignment may result in harm and costs to Agency. Consultant agrees not to remove, replace or reassign any such individuals without the approval of Agency. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Consultant shall make reasonable efforts to maintain continuity in its staffing and provide Agency ample notification if any such changes are made. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is agreed by Consultant that Agency is relying on the expertise and experience of Consultant as well as Consultant’s subcontractors, and therefore Consultant shall not terminate the services of a subcontractor employed for the benefit of Agency without the prior approval of Agency, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Agency may, in its discretion, direct Consultant to replace subcontractors that Agency reasonably believes are not performing in a satisfactory manner. Consultant shall ensure that subcontracts contain express acknowledgement by subcontractors of Agency’s right to replace them and shall require the subcontractors to waive any claims or damages in connection therewith, save and except for costs and fees incurred to the date of said termination, plus reasonable costs incurred as a result of said termination. ARTICLE 5 RECORDS To the extent Agency does not otherwise specifically request delivery of records or results, Consultant agrees to retain all records and results of Services performed under this Agreement for a period of not less than two years after completion of the Services. At Agency’s request, Consultant shall deliver a copy of any or all original field notes, investigative notes, tests, photographs, records, calculations, details, drawings, specifications, summaries and reports produced and collected in the course of Services performed under this Agreement. ARTICLE 6 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Agency shall own all data, reports, information, manuals, drawings, or other written, electronic, recorded, photographic or visual materials, or other deliverables produced in the performance of this Agreement for use by Agency. Consultant shall retain no ownership interest in any of the foregoing described deliverables except as may be described herein, and such deliverables, including those retained by Consultant in the normal course of Consultant’s business, may not be reused, sold, transferred or conveyed without Agency’s permission. Any reuse of Consultant prepared documents, except for the specific purpose intended hereunder, shall be at Agency's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant or its subconsultants. ARTICLE 7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST/BUSINESS ETHICS Consultant shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that would result in a conflict with Agency’s interest. During the term of this Agreement, neither Consultant nor its subcontractors shall accept employment or engage in any work that creates a conflict of interest between Consultant and Agency, or in any way compromises the interest of Agency for which Contractor’s services are being retained. Consultant shall immediately notify Agency of any and all such violations of this clause, by Consultant, its agents or subcontractors, immediately upon becoming aware of such violations. Failure of such notification or lack of knowledge of a violation by Consultant or its subcontractors shall not excuse the performance hereunder.


ARTICLE 8 TERMINATION Agency may suspend or terminate this Agreement by giving thirty days prior written notice to Consultant, but such termination shall not relieve Agency of its obligation to pay Consultant for expenses incurred and Services performed up to the date of termination and all reasonable expenses that Consultant incurs by reason of such termination. Any reports, drawings or other documents prepared for Agency prior to the effective date of such termination shall be delivered to Agency by Consultant prior to Agency’s release of its final payment to Consultant. ARTICLE 9 WARRANTY Consultant warrants that its Services are performed with the degree of skill and care that is required by current, good and sound professional procedures and practices, and in conformance with generally accepted professional standards prevailing at the time the Services are performed so as to ensure that the Services performed are correct and appropriate for the purposes contemplated in this Agreement. Any warranty claim by Agency shall be made within 30 days of completion of the Services. ARTICLE 10 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Consultant’s total cumulative liability for any claims of any kind, whether based on contract, tort (including negligence and strict liability), under any warranty or otherwise, for any loss or damage relating to this Agreement, except for the performance of the Services which shall be limited to the fees paid therefore, shall not exceed the insurance coverage specified in this Agreement, and Agency hereby releases Consultant from any liability in excess of such amount. This monetary limitation shall survive the failure of any exclusive remedy. Neither Agency nor Consultant shall be liable, whether based on contract, tort (including negligence and strict liability), under any warranty or otherwise relating to the Services or this Agreement, for any consequential, indirect, special, punitive or incidental loss or damage, any damage or loss of any property or equipment, or any loss of use of property or equipment, and Agency and Consultant mutually release the other from any liability for all such losses and damages. All of the provisions of this Agreement providing for limitation or protection against liability of Consultant and Agency shall also protect their directors, officers and employees, and affiliated entities of Consultant and their directors, officers, employees and affiliates, and shall apply regardless of the fault, negligence or strict liability of Consultant, its directors, officers, employees or affiliates.


ARTICLE 11 INSURANCE Consultant shall provide and continue to maintain during the performance of this Agreement insurance coverage as follows:

i. Workers’ Compensation insurance in compliance with statutory limits. ii. Employers’ Liability with the following limits:

Each Accident $1,000,000 iii. Business Automobile Liability with the following limits:

Combined Single Limit $1,000,000 iv. Commercial General Liability with the following limits:

Each Occurrence $500,000 General Aggregate $1,000,000

v. Professional Liability Insurance with the following limits: Any One Claim $500,000 Policy Aggregate $1,000,000

ARTICLE 12 SAFETY Consultant shall plan and conduct its work to safeguard persons and property from injury. Consultant shall direct performance of the work in compliance with reasonable safety and work practices and applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Agency may designate safety precautions in addition to those in use or proposed by Consultant. Agency reserves the right to inspect the work and to halt work to ensure compliance with reasonable and safe work practices and with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations. ARTICLE 13 DELAYS Neither party shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder, except obligations to make payments for Services previously performed, to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by any cause that is beyond the reasonable control of the affected party. In the event either party claims that such performance of its obligations was prevented or delayed by any such cause, that party shall promptly notify the other party of that fact, and of the circumstances preventing or delaying performance. Such party claiming a cause-delayed performance shall endeavor, to the extent reasonable, to remove the obstacles which preclude performance. ARTICLE 14 DISPUTES Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be subject to mediation under the guidelines of the American Arbitration Association in Sacramento, California, as a condition precedent to the institution of arbitration. If any dispute, controversy or claim cannot be resolved through mediation, it shall be resolved through binding arbitration under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association in Sacramento, California. The Arbitrator shall give full effect to Articles 9 and 10 and shall not deviate therefrom.


ARTICLE 15 NOTICES Any notice related to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be considered duly made if delivered to the other party at the following addresses: Consultant: Agency: TERRA/ GeoPentech South Feather Water and Power Agency Andrew Dinsick, P.E. Kyle Morgado, P.E., Water Resources Engineer 350 Sansome Street, Suite 830 2310 Oro-Quincy Hwy. San Francisco, CA 94104 Oroville, CA 95966 Telephone: (714)796-9100 Telephone: (530) 538-8841 [email protected] [email protected] Either party may change its address or numbers for receiving notices by giving written notice of such change to the other party. ARTICLE 16 SURVIVAL The provisions of this Agreement which by their nature should survive expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement, including but not limited to provisions regarding warranty and liability, shall survive such expiration, cancellation or other termination. ARTICLE 17 LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law principles.


ARTICLE 18 INTEGRATION These terms and conditions are intended by Consultant and Agency to constitute the final and complete statement of their agreement, and all prior proposals, communications and understandings related to the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby superseded. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be effective unless the same is in writing and signed by both parties. CONSULTANT: SCHAAF & WHEELER CONSULTING SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER AGENCY CIVIL ENGINEERS By: __________________________________ By:_______________________________ Daniel J. Schaaf, PE Michael C. Glaze Title: Vice President Title: General Manager Date: ___________________ Date: ______________________

SLY CREEK DAM SEISMIC STABILITY EVALAUTION


i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SECTION 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ i

SECTION 2 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ......................................................................................................... ii

SECTION 3 TEAM QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3

3.1 The TGP Team ........................................................................................................ 3

3.2 Key Personnel ........................................................................................................ 3

3.3 Resumes ................................................................................................................. 4

SECTION 4 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................... 4

4.1 Task 1 – Project Management .............................................................................. 4

4.2 Task 2 – Review of Available Data and Past Investigations ................................... 5

4.3 Task 3 – Geologic Setting and Site Conditions Review .......................................... 5

4.4 Task 4 – Ground Motion Characterization ............................................................. 5

4.5 Task 5 – Numerical Model Development .............................................................. 6

4.6 Task 6 – Static Stability and Seismic Deformation Analysis .................................. 6

4.7 Task 7 – Documentation and Report Preparation ................................................. 7

4.8 Task 8 – Peer Review and FERC/DSOD Approval ................................................... 7

SECTION 5 PAST PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND EXAMPLE PROJECTS ..................................................................... 7

SECTION 6 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SCHEDULE ..................................................................................... 8

SECTION 7 LEVEL OF EFFORT ..................................................................................................................... 9

SECTION 8 INSURANCE AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT .................................................................................. 9

Attachment A – Brief Resumes of Key Personel

Attachment B – Project Descriptions for Past Projects

Attachment C – Proof of Insurance Requirements

ii

April 28, 2016

Mr. Kyle Morgado, P.E. South Feather Water and Power Agency 2310 Oro‐Quincy Highway Oroville, CA 95966 Re: Proposal for Sly Creek Dam Seismic Stability Evaluation

Dear Mr. Morgado:

In accordance with the guidance contained in your Request for Proposal (RFP) dated April 7, 2016, the TERRA / GeoPentech Joint Venture is pleased to submit its proposal addressing the Seismic Stability Evaluation for Sly Creek Dam in Butte County, CA.

TERRA / GeoPentech (TGP) is a joint venture of Terra Engineers, Inc. (TERRA) and GeoPentech, Inc. (GeoPentech), which was formed in 2008. The TGP Team successfully completed seismic safety evaluations for San Pablo Dam and Camanche Reservoir for EBMUD and Stevens Creek and Lenihan Dams for SCVWD, and is currently working on the design and construction of Chabot Dam Seismic Upgrades for EBMUD.

With proven success in completing projects subject to DSOD/FERC jurisdictional review, the TGP Joint Venture brings the Agency a team of highly qualified professionals drawn from the staff at TERRA and GeoPentech. Our team has completed review of the RFP, and we have developed an efficient approach which will comply with current regulations while keeping up with the most advanced seismic hazard evaluation practice implemented by major Utilities whose assets are also under DSOD/FERC jurisdiction. Our current engagement in ongoing projects sponsored by PG&E and SCE on seismic evaluation for their dams provides us with a vantage point in understanding the technical challenges, and implementing a streamlined yet robust evaluation of seismicity, ground motion and seismic deformation analyses. Our proposed work approach will reduce cost, improve quality, save time, and provide a unified and consistent framework for ground motion development with respect to dam owners under DSOD/FERC jurisdiction.

The work proposed herein will be finalized by the project completion date of October 7, 2016. The timeline of activities has been specifically designed to allow for ample interaction with Agency Staff and internal reviewers, to coordinate technical interaction with parallel efforts, and to interact with DSOD and FERC as appropriate. Further details on how we propose to manage interactions with the Agency and other technical and jurisdictional reviewers are discussed in our proposal.

Our expected deliverable for this project would be a technical report documenting the inputs, methodologies, results and recommendations pertaining to the seismic stability of the existing dam for submittal to jurisdictional entities.

We thank the South Feather Water and Power Agency for the opportunity to prepare this proposal and we look forward to discussing the project with you.

Sincerely,

Andrew Dinsick, P.E. Robert C. Kirby, P.E., G.E. Project Engineer Project Manager



3

SECTION 3 – TEAM QUALIFICATIONS

3.1 THE TGP TEAM

TERRA / GeoPentech (TGP) is a joint venture of TERRA engineers, Inc. (TERRA) and GeoPentech, Inc. (GeoPentech) with a proven record of successfully completed projects. TERRA is a woman-owned small business headquartered in San Francisco, California that specializes in dam and water resources projects. GeoPentech is a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) headquartered in Irvince, California, that specialized in earthquake engineering, seismology and numerical analysis for critical infrastructure.

TGP was formed over six years ago to provide services to the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) for the seismic safety review of the embankments at the DSOD and FERC regulated Camanche Reservoir, following our teamwork on the San Pablo Dam Seismic Upgrades project. TGP more recently completed the seismic safety evaluations of Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams for the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) and is currently leading a team that is designing seismic upgrades for Chabot Dam for EBMUD. Professionals at TERRA and GeoPentech have worked on over 75 previous dam projects under DSOD and FERC jurisdiction and have extensive experience working with jurisdictional personnel on endeavours that are similar to the Sly Creek Dam project.

Many of the dams we have worked on in the past are located in areas where the design conditions are controlled by high ground shaking; as a result, the characterization of ground motions and material properties has been of paramount importance. Appropriately characterizing these aspects has resulted in successful outcomes, as defined by optimized remediation or confirming adequate seismic performance the existing dams. Two good examples of positive outcomes for projects with a similar scope to Sly Creek are the Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams for SCVWD. At the onset of these studies, the seismic performance of the dams was unknown and the potential for expensive remediation was considered likely. However, based on careful characterization of the key aspects at each site, adequate seismic performance was demonstrated through numerical analysis and remediation was not required. Samples of the final reports prepared for Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams for SCVWD are publically available at the following links:

http://www.valleywater.org/uploadedFiles/Services/CleanReliableWater/WhereDoesYourWater

ComeFrom/Reservoirs/Lexington/Tab%205%20-%20SSE2%20Rpt%20LN-4%20Final.pdf?n=8446

http://www.valleywater.org/uploadedFiles/Services/CleanReliableWater/WhereDoesYourWater

ComeFrom/Reservoirs/Stevens_Creek/Tab%205%20-%20SSE2%20Rpt%20SC-

3%20Final.pdf?n=7254

The two examples presented above are representative of the layout, structure, and overall quality of the final report that would be provided for the Sly Creek Dam project.

3.2 KEY PERSONNEL

We have gathered a team of well qualified, experienced professionals to support the Agency’s needs as summarized in our Project Organization Chart on Figure 3-1 (Page 4), led by our Project Manager, Bob Kirby and our Project Engineer, Andrew Dinsick. Mr. Kirby and Mr. Dinsick have experience working on seismic stability evaluations for over 30 jurisdictional dams, including working together in similar roles on the Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams discussed above. They bring expertise in the fields of seismic hazard analysis, ground motion characterization, and material property characterization for nonlinear response history analysis. Mr. Dinsick has performed seismic hazard analyses on numerous embankment dams, including the recent development of deterministic response spectra for 21 Southern California Edison

http://www.valleywater.org/uploadedFiles/Services/CleanReliableWater/WhereDoesYourWaterComeFrom/Reservoirs/Lexington/Tab%205%20-%20SSE2%20Rpt%20LN-4%20Final.pdf?n=8446

http://www.valleywater.org/uploadedFiles/Services/CleanReliableWater/WhereDoesYourWaterComeFrom/Reservoirs/Lexington/Tab%205%20-%20SSE2%20Rpt%20LN-4%20Final.pdf?n=8446

http://www.valleywater.org/uploadedFiles/Services/CleanReliableWater/WhereDoesYourWaterComeFrom/Reservoirs/Stevens_Creek/Tab%205%20-%20SSE2%20Rpt%20SC-3%20Final.pdf?n=7254





4

(SCE) FERC regulated hydroelectric dams in the Sierra region using NGA-W2 ground motions. Mr. Dinsick is also very experienced in developing spectrally matched time histories for response and deformation analyses, having performed these tasks on over 30 projects in the last three years.

Working under the direction of the Project Engineer, supporting technical staff will ensure that the activities required for the successful completion of tasks are completed.

Dr. Yoshi Moriwaki and Mr. John Barneich will serve as Senior Technical Reviewers. These experts have extensive experience with seismic stability evaluations of earth and rockfill dams and will provide valuable insight through the nonlinear response history analysis.

The three key elements of work, Site Characterization, Ground Motion Development and Numerical Modeling will be led by Mr. Rick Harlan, Dr. Carola Di Alessandro and Dr. Rambod Hadidi, respectively. Mr. Harlan has over 30 years of experience involving geologic investigation, earthquake and fault hazard evaluations for several existing and proposed dams and hydroelectric projects, including past experience preparing Five-Year Dam Safety Inspection Reports for Sly Creek Dam. Dr. Di Alessandro has 15 years of experience in the field of engineering seismology, with emphasis on ground-motion evaluation and characterization, including attenuation evaluation, ground motion selection and modification, and signals processing. Dr. Hadidi has 16 years of experience in the fields of geotechnical engineering and numerical modelling including developing FLAC models for seismic stability evaluations of DSOD and FERC regulated dams.

3.3 RESUMES

Brief summary resumes for the key team members are provided in Attachment A. Full resumes, as well as resumes for supporting staff, are available upon request.

SECTION 4 – SCOPE OF WORK

This section describes our proposed scope of work, which consists of the following tasks identified to successfully complete the seismic stability evaluation

4.1 TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT

TGP will manage the work to meet the project's scope, schedule, cost and quality requirements. A detailed work plan will be developed in conjunction with the Agency project management to: (1) meet specific project requirements; (2) tailor tasks to site conditions and challenges; (3) monitor tasks’ progress and adherence to scope of work; (4) develop contingency plans while anticipating and identifying potentials



5

technical issues. Another key action pertinent to project management is the continuous and satisfactory project interface with the Agency, and the DSOD and FERC regulators as appropriate.

4.2 TASK 2 – REVIEW OF AVAILABLE DATA AND PAST INVESTIGATIONS

The TGP Team will carefully review relevant documents on the dam prepared by the Agency, DSOD, FERC and outside consultants. We understand that significant information from the construction of the dam in the 1960s and subsequent analyses of the dam will provide a valuable resource of existing data to complete the analysis.

4.3 TASK 3 – GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SITE CONDITIONS REVIEW

In the preparation of this proposal we have reviewed a 2002 Five-Year Inspection Report submitted to FERC which was prepared by Mr. Rick Harlan of our team. Based on the review of this information we understand that the dam is fairly resilient to the seismic demand from local earthquakes and it is not anticipated that the recent addition of the MSE Wall at the dam crest would significantly change this conclusion. Furthermore, we understand that investigations performed to support the design of the newly constructed MSE Wall will provide the pertinent information needed to complete a seismic stability evaluation with minimal additional field work. As part of this task, geologists and geophysicists from the TGP Team will perform field geologic reconnaissance to confirm various aspects of the characterization, including the site-specific shear-wave velocity, VS30 and foundation conditions. This methodology, combined with available data, would provide significant cost savings compared to drilling boreholes to collect soil samples or shear-wave velocity data.

4.4 TASK 4 – GROUND MOTION CHARACTERIZATION

As part of this task, historic seismicity and paleoseismicity in the region will be evaluated, published data and models on relevant earthquake faults will be reviewed. This work will focus on selecting the appropriate magnitude and distance for scenario events to be implemented in the Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA) for the site. It is noted that members of the TGP Team are currently interacting with PG&E and SCE during their on-going source characterization efforts. This interaction will be an important element of this task to provide a consistent basis for evaluating seismic hazard of DSOD- and FERC-regulated dams in the Sierra region.

The ground motions for each dam will be characterized through a site-specific DSHA using the newly released Next Generation Attenuation – West 2 (NGA-W2) ground motion prediction equations. Scenario events will be evaluated at the 50th or 84th percentile levels using the DSOD guidelines documented by Fraser and Howard (2002); this methodology uses the DSOD consequence hazard matrix to select the appropriate hazard level on the basis of causative fault slip rate and Total Class Weight. The maximum response spectral ordinates from the scenario events considered will be used to define the Seismic Safety Earthquake (SSE) for each dam. Directivity effects will be considered in the development of the SSE spectrum, as appropriate, for scenarios that occur within 10 km of the dam sites.

Following the development of the design response spectrum, three earthquake time histories will be selected to represent the scenario earthquake that controls the seismic hazard at the site. The selection of seed time histories for the nonlinear dynamic response analyses would be carried out to identify records which have similar magnitude, closest distance, geologic conditions and intensity measures to the events for each scenario spectrum. Screening of records from the PEER Ground Motion database would systematically identify the most appropriate records for analysis based on magnitude, distance, spectral shape, Arias Intensity and significant duration. After the team has agreed upon the design response spectra and seed time histories, the time histories will be spectrally matched to their corresponding target



6

spectra. The spectral matching will be performed using the latest version of RSPMATCH developed by Dr. Norm Abrahamson as updated by Dr. Linda Al Atik. This process will target a tight match over the period range of 0.01 to at least 5.0 seconds.

4.5 TASK 5 – NUMERICAL MODEL DEVELOPMENT

The stratigraphic and material property characterization will feed directly into the development of the 2-D numerical model that will be the main engine for the performance evaluation. This task will include the following subtasks:

Analysis Section Development: A 2-D analysis cross section will be developed that appropriately captures the maximum response of the dam for static and seismic loading. Design and construction documents will be used as the primary database to construct the cross section. Embankment zoning (i.e., shell, core and drain zones) will be appropriately represented in the 2-D model. The location, thickness and constituents of the foundation materials will also be an important consideration in defining the analysis cross section.

Material Property Characterization: For each zone of the maximum dam cross section, embankment fill and foundation material material properties will be developed for the various geologic units, including: unit weight; effective friction angle; undrained strength ratio; shear-wave velocity; representative clean-sand SPT and/or CPT penetration resistance for liquefaction triggering evaluation; residual undrained shear strength; and other properties, as needed.

Numerical Model Development: Using the results of the stratigraphic and material property characterization, a limit equilibrium slope stability model will be developed using Slope/W (GEO-SLOPE, 2012) or an equivalent computational platform and a 2-D numerical model will be developed using the finite difference code FLAC (FLAC 8.0, Itasca, 2015). The FLAC model will include a finite difference mesh, the size of which will constrained based on kinematic and wave-passage considerations. The model will be defined with an adequately deep base to capture the effect of foundation materials on the response of the dam. The model will have a compliant base so that seismic energy can leave the system as needed during loading. For the purpose of the development of this workplan use of a Mohr-Coulomb soil model for each material type is assumed. Based on our review of the embankment materials, it is not anticipated that an advanced constitutive model (e.g., UBCSAND or PM4SAND) will be needed for this analysis.

4.6 TASK 6 – STATIC STABILITY AND SEISMIC DEFORMATION ANALYSIS

The first set of analyses conducted on the embankment will focus on the stability of the existing dam under static loading conditions. (As optional tasks, various static loading scenarios including steady-state maximum pool elevation, flooding scenarios, and rapid drawdown will also be evaluated.) To support these analyses, a steady-state seepage analysis will be conducted to develop an understanding of the initial pore pressures and effective stress conditions in the embankment; based on the complexity of the groundwater regime, this analysis will be conducted with PLAXIS 2D (Plaxis, 2015). Given the steady-state pore pressures, static factors of safety for the static loading cases selected will be calculated assuming both circular and non-circular potential slip surfaces; based on the complexity of the analysis section and material properties, these analyses will be conducted with either SLOPE/W (GEO-SLOPE, 2012) or an equivalent computational platform.

The SLOPE/W limit equilibrium model will be used to conduct pseudostatic stability analyses of the embankment. Once a yield acceleration is established for the controlling seismic loading case (for both upstream and downstream slip surfaces), displacements will be estimated using the Makdisi and Seed (1978) or Bray and Travasarou (2009) methods. This pseudostatic analysis and the use of a simplified



7

seismic slope stability evaluations would be developed to make an estimate of displacements for comparison with the nonlinear time history analysis for quality control purposes.

The performance of the embankment under seismic loading conditions will then be evaluated based on fully coupled, nonlinear deformation analyses using the 2-D FLAC model developed in Task 5 and the steady-state seepage conditions calculated above. This portion of the analysis will include the necessary model validation efforts, including single element simulations and comparisons with two-dimensional response models from QUAD4MU. These validation efforts will be used to constrain the strain-compatible, equivalent linear properties (i.e., reduced shear modulus and damping ratio) for each material zone in the FLAC model. This workplan assumes that there is not a liquefaction risk based on previous analyses conducted for the project. Embankment stability at the end of shaking will be assessed in each case.

The performance of the embankment will be evaluated through inspection of total calculated displacement, calculated shear strains, crest settlement (including additional seismic settlement, if appropriate). If applicable, the displacement pattern and shear strains will be assessed with respect to internal erosion potential. Specific emphasis during this process will be placed on implication of results of the analysis with respect to safety/risk as well as discussion of potential parametric cases that would highlight key data gaps and provide additional value to the project.

4.7 TASK 7 – DOCUMENTATION AND REPORT PREPARATION

The general approach for this task is to concisely and comprehensively document the outcome of the various tasks in a technical report will be issued to the Agency to document all phases and results of the proposed study and submitted to DSOD and FERC for regulatory review.

4.8 TASK 8 – PEER REVIEW AND FERC/DSOD APPROVAL

We understand that a regulatory review and approval by FERC/DSOD will be required for this project. This task provides for participation in meetings and responding to review questions associated with the technical submittals of this project.

SECTION 5 – PAST PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND EXAMPLE PROJECTS

As shown in the Service Matrix presented below in Table 5-1, the TGP Team has extensive experience in all aspects of ground motion characterization services needed by our clients including: site and source characterization; seismic hazard analysis; time history development; site response and de-convolution; numerical modelling; and working under DSOD/FERC jurisdictional review.

The Service Matrix lists selected seismic stability evaluation projects completed by professionals of TGP for clients with similar technical requirements to South Feather Water and Power Agency (the Agency). This matrix includes twelve projects where TGP developed ground motion response spectra, time histories for the numerical modelling and performed stability evaluations of jurisdictional dam projects in the last several years. For each project, a checkmark “” is placed in the applicable spaces for various areas of the services provided by the professionals of TGP. As shown, many of these selected projects are similar in nature to this assignment; more detailed project descriptions are presented in Attachment B of this proposal.



8

Table 5-1 TGP Service Matrix

KEY SERVICES

PROJECTS

Seis

mic

Sit

e

Ch

arac

teri

zati

on

Seis

mic

So

urc

e

Ch

arac

teri

zati

on

Pro

bab

ilist

ic S

eis

mic

H

azar

d A

nal

ysis

De

term

inis

tic

Seis

mic

Haz

ard

An

alys

is

Co

nd

itio

nal

Me

an

Spe

ctru

m A

pp

roac

h

Gro

un

d M

oti

on

Tim

e

His

tory

De

velo

pm

en

t

Site

Re

spo

nse

an

d

De

-co

nvo

luti

on

Nu

me

rica

l Mo

de

lin

g

DSO

D/F

ERC

Re

vie

w

DAM SEISMIC STABILITY EVALAUTION PROJECTS Camanche Dam – EBMUD

San Pablo Dam – EBMUD

Chabot Dam – EBMUD

21 Dams Ground Motion Update – SCE

Big Creek Dam No. 7 – SCE

Rhinedollar Dam – SCE

Bishop Creek Dam No. 2 – SCE

Stevens Creek Dam – SCVWD

Lenihan Dam – SCVWD

Upper Chiquita Reservoir – SWMD

Walnut Canyon Dam – City of Anaheim

Bouquet Canyon Dams – LADWP

Elysian Dam – LADWP

Palos Verdes Reservoir – MWD

Live Oak Reservoir – MWD

SECTION 6 – IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SCHEDULE

Based on an estimated date for the notice-to-proceed provided in the RFP by (May 2016, assumed to be at the beginning of the month herein), we expect that the final report can be submitted by October 7, 2016 (and approved by regulatory entities shortly thereafter). Table 6-1 contains a preliminary list of dates for completion of main deliverables on the project (after review and approval by the Agency, as necessary); a more detailed work breakdown structure will be developed at the onset of the project. Table 6-2 contains a list of proposed planned review activities (including meetings) where the Agency is engaged with the approaches and outcomes of the project.

Table 6-1 Milestone Dates for Project Deliverables

Task(s) Deliverable Date

2, 3 TM-01: Memorandum Summarizing Past Investigations, Available Data and Site Conditions

June 10, 2016

4 TM-02: Memorandum on Ground Motion Characterization, Design Response Spectra and Time Histories

July 8, 2016

5, 6 TM-03: Memorandum on Numerical Model Development and Static Stability Cases

August 5, 2016

6, 7 Draft Final Report with Analysis Results September 9, 2016

7 Complete Final Report October 7, 2016



9

Table 6-2 Milestone Dates for Review Activities

Task(s) Deliverable Reviewer Date

2,3 Review of Site Conditions TM01 Internal/Agency June 17, 2016

4 Review of Spectrum and Time Histories Internal/Agency July 15, 2016

5,6 Review of Static Stability and Model Internal/Agency August 12, 2016

6,7 Review Draft Final Report The Agency September 27, 2016

At various stages in the evaluation process, the work performed by the Project Engineer and Support Staff will be reviewed by TGP Team Internal Technical Reviewers. Once the work has been performed and checked by the TGP Team, a second review with the Agency team would be conducted through working meetings/conference calls. These working meetings would consist of a submittal by email of draft technical memoranda, followed by discussion in an open forum with the Agency team. Two or three working meetings would likely be required during the stability evaluation. Following consensus on the work performed for all phases of the project, the results would be documented in a final report focusing on the three major elements of work: ground motion characterization, model development and analysis results. This work would be performed by the Project Engineer and Support Analysts and checked by the Internal Technical Reviewers prior to submittal to the Agency. This plan would result in final documentation submitted no later than October 7, 2016, as requested by the Agency.

SECTION 7 – LEVEL OF EFFORT

We propose to complete the above scope of work on a time and material basis with an estimated total cost of $49,960 for Tasks 1 through 8. A breakdown of the cost per the tasks described above is shown in Table 7-1, a more detailed breakdown of each task by sub-task can be provided upon request.

SECTION у – INSURANCE AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT

A sample of our insurance certificate meeting the Agency’s requirements identified in the RFP is provided in Attachment C. Based on a review of the provided the Agency’s Standard Consulting Services Agreement, we take no exceptions to the wording of the contract.

Labor Rate ($/hr): $245 $180 $155 $120 $80 $300

Personnel Title: Principal Senior

Professional

Project

Professional

Sr Staff

ProfessionalAdmin Support

Internal

ReviewTotal Hours

Field and Lab

Fees

Other Direct

Costs

Total Task Item

Cost

Task Item Description hours hours hours hours hours hours

Task 1 – Project Management 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 -$ -$ 4,900$

Task 2 – Review of Available Data

and Past Investigations4 4 8 4 0 0 20 -$ -$ 3,420$

Task 3 – Geologic Setting and Site

Conditions Review0 4 24 8 0 0 36 1,500$ 1,500$ 8,400$

Task 4 – Ground Motion

Characterization2 4 24 0 0 0 30 -$ -$ 4,930$

Task 5 – Numerical Model

Development0 4 16 40 0 0 60 -$ -$ 8,000$

Task 6 – Static Stability and Seismic

Deformation Analysis4 16 24 24 0 0 68 -$ -$ 10,460$

Task 7 – Documentation and Report

Preparation4 8 16 16 0 0 44 -$ -$ 6,820$

Task 8 – Peer Review and

FERC/DSOD Approval2 8 4 4 0 0 18 -$ -$ 3,030$

TOTAL 36 48 116 96 0 0 296 1,500$ 1,500$

Proposed Total Cost =

Table 7-1 Cost Breakdown by Task

49,960$



Page A-1

ATTACHMENT A

BRIEF RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL



Page A-2

Bob Kirby, G.E., P.E. • PRINCIPAL ENGINEER OFFICE: (888) 888-4730 • FAX: (888) 888-4731 • [email protected]

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 42

YEARS WITH FIRM: 10

EDUCATION

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Civil Engineer Degree, 1972

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, M.S. Civil Engineering, 1972

Northeastern University, B.S. Civil Engineering, 1969

REGISTRATION

Professional Engineer in Civil Engineering: CA, NY, NJ, MA, PA

Geotechnical Engineer: CA

AFFILIATIONS

Fellow, American Society of Civil Engineers

PUBLICATIONS

Author of over 15 technical papers on subjects related to

Seismic Upgrades for Dams

Cement Deep Soil Mixing

Construction on Soft Ground

Pile Foundations

Critical State Soil Mechanics

AWARDS

Outstanding Technical Paper, Boston Society of Civil Engineers

Hogentogler Award, A.S.T.M

Innovative Practice Award, Woodward-Clyde

OTC Hall of Fame Award, American Society of Civil Engineers

SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

Mr. Kirby has over forty years of experience providing consulting engineering and project / program management services on geotechnical and environmental projects. He has experience with all phases of geotechnical engineering work including: field investigations; laboratory testing; geotechnical engineering analyses; evaluation of alternative solutions; development of recommendations for geotechnical design parameters; preparation of geotechnical engineering reports; development of plans, specifications and cost estimates; constructability reviews; and construction-phase services. Examples of dam projects where Mr. Kirby was a senior member of the project team are provided below.

San Pablo Dam Seismic Upgrades, El Sobrante, CA – TERRA performed final design studies for seismic upgrades at San Pablo Dam that involved in-situ improvement of the alluvial foundation materials by Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM) and construction of a new enlarged downstream buttress; prepared construction plans, specifications, and cost estimate (PS&E); and provided design support during construction. Mr. Kirby was the Task Leader for the CDSM Test Section and the design of the CDSM treatment. Mr. Kirby also led the production of the PS&Es for the construction of the upgrades and provided design-support during construction including review of contractor submittals, RFIs, and QC data. He was also the primary contact for DSOD during construction of the upgrades.

Chabot Dam Seismic Upgrades, Oakland, CA – Mr. Kirby was responsible for completing the constructability review of seismic upgrades for Chabot Dam. The alternative remedial measures included excavation and replacement of soils susceptible to liquefaction and in-situ improvement of the soils using Cement Deep Soil Mixing. The constructability review considered alternative haul routes and temporary fill storage locations (both on-site and off-site). A model was prepared to evaluate twenty-four (24) different alternatives based on cost, schedule, construction risks, environmental impacts, and permit requirements.

Seismic Stability Evaluations for Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams, Santa Clara, CA – A TERRA/GeoPentech joint venture completed the seismic safety evaluations for two Santa Clara Valley Water District dams. Mr. Kirby’s role on the projects included leading the field investigations and laboratory testing programs; analyses of seepage conditions; evaluation of the need for temporary reservoir operating restrictions; and development of conceptual designs for remedial measures. He was the primary contact with the DSOD project managers responsible for reviewing and approving the seismic safety evaluations. Seismic upgrades were found unnecessary for both dams and this outcome, although controversial, was eventually approved by DSOD. Conceptual remedial measures were developed for Stevens Creek Dam and Mr. Kirby led a team that developed and evaluated these concepts.



Page A-3

Andrew Dinsick, PE • ASSOCIATE OFFICE: (714) 796-9100 • FAX: (714) 796-9191 • [email protected]


YEARS WITH FIRM: 9

EDUCATION

University of California at Los Angeles, MS, Geotechnical Engineering, 2012

Duke University, B.S. Civil Engineering, 2003

REGISTRATION

Civil Engineering, CA, 2008 (C72802)

AFFILIATIONS

American Society of Civil Engineers

Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

Seismological Society of America

AREA OF EXPERTISE

Mr. Dinsick focuses his practice on topics related to:

Geotechnical Engineering

Earthquake Engineering

Seismic Hazard Analysis

Ground Motion Evaluation

Liquefaction Evaluation

Liquefaction Mitigation

Probabilistic Analysis


Mr. Dinsick has over 12 years of experience in the field of geotechnical and earthquake engineering with an emphasis on seismic hazard analysis. Past project experience has included contribution to ground motion development and seismic stability evaluations on over 30 DSOD jurisdictional dams. His expertise includes characterization of subsurface material static and dynamic properties, liquefaction evaluation, seismic hazard analysis and ground motion characterization. Mr. Dinsick has performed seismic hazard analyses and developed spectrally matched time histories for response and deformation analyses for numerous earthfill and concrete dam projects. He has also participated in studies involving complex site response analyses and soil structure interaction applications.

East Bay Municipal Utility District | Design of Chabot Dam Seismic Upgrades, Oakland, CA – Project Engineer. Responsible for supplemental field explorations and engineering studies in support of the design of seismic upgrades at Chabot Dam that include in-situ treatment of foundation materials near the downstream toe of the dam with Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM) combined and seismic retrofit of the outlet works. In addition to site characterization, Mr. Dinsick's responsibilities include selection of site-specific ground motions for use in the non-linear analyses of the dynamic stability of the dam embankment, review of the results of the non-linear analyses of the performance of the dam before and after CDSM treatment, and dynamic response analyses of the vertical shaft in rock at the outlet works in support of the design of the new shaft lining.

Southern California Edison Dams, Sierra Nevada Region, CA – Project Engineer for the update of ground motion response spectra for 21 SCE dams in the Sierra Nevada region. Specifically evaluated the impact of NGA-W2 ground motion models on PSHA and DHSA results for DSOD and FERC jurisdictional dams.

San Pablo Dam Seismic Upgrades, El Sobrante, CA – Mr. Dinsick carried out many of the data reduction and characterization efforts for this hydraulic fill dam constructed in 1921. Mr. Dinsick was responsible for developing a 3-D model of the foundation bedrock at the site using new and existing geotechnical data. As a result of the characterization efforts, the nonlinear analyses completed and interaction with the Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), the CDSM was optimized and the downstream buttress was reduced in size which resulted in significant cost savings. Subsequently, Mr. Dinsick provided engineering support during construction of CDSM and new downstream buttress.

Seismic Stability Evaluations for Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams, Santa Clara, CA – Mr. Dinsick carried out many of the data reduction and characterization efforts for these two existing dams which are located within a few kilometers of the San Andreas Fault. Issues addressed during this evaluation included assessing foundation soil liquefaction potential and the characterization of shear strength and dynamic material properties for a complex zoned dam. The results of the dynamic stability analyses and interaction with DSOD resulted in minor remediation of Stevens Creek Dam and no remediation of Lenihan Dam, contrary to initial perceptions and expectations.



Page A-4

Yoshi Moriwaki, PhD, PE, GE • SENIOR CONSULTANT OFFICE: (714) 796-9100 • FAX: (714) 796-9191 • [email protected]


YEARS WITH FIRM: 15

EDUCATION

University of California at Berkeley, PhD. Geotechnical Engineering, 1975

Massachusetts Institute of Tech., M.S. Engineering Mechanics, 1968

B.S. Civil Engineering, 1966

REGISTRATION


Geotechnical Engineering, CA, 2000 (GE2499)

AFFILIATIONS




PUBLICATIONS

Author of many technical papers on subjects related to:






Ground Motions

Numerical Analysis


Other Topics


Dr. Moriwaki has 49 years of consulting experience in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, with emphasis on infrastructure facilities including: earth and rockfill dams, nuclear power plants, canals, pipelines, treatment facilities, bridges, roadways, and ports and harbors. For the last three decades Dr. Moriwaki has been heavily involved in the seismic evaluation and retrofit of earth dams in areas of high seismicity. Over this time period he has worked on over 40 DSOD jurisdictional dams in California many of which involved the need for and implementation of seismic retrofit strategies.

San Pablo Dam Seismic Upgrades, El Sobrante, CA – Dr. Moriwaki lead the characterization and dynamic analysis efforts for this hydraulic fill dam constructed in 1921. In previous investigations, the shells of the dam and alluvial foundation soils beneath the embankment were considered to have high liquefaction potential. With the high design earthquake shaking conditions (0.91g peak ground acceleration) developed for the site, the seismic upgrading design focused on deep soil mix downstream of the embankment to be overlain by downstream berm and other associated modifications. As a result of the characterization efforts, the nonlinear analyses completed and interaction with the Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), the CDSM was optimized and the downstream buttress was reduced in size which resulted in significant cost savings.

East Bay Municipal Utility District | Design of Chabot Dam Seismic Upgrades, Oakland, CA – Principal Engineer. Responsible for overseeing the non-linear dynamic analyses for the design of seismic upgrades at Chabot Dam that include in-situ treatment of foundation materials at the downstream toe of the dam with Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM) and seismic retrofit of the outlet works. Dr. Moriwaki provided expert input into the selection of site-specific ground motions for use in the non-linear analyses of the dynamic stability of the dam embankment and performance of the CDSM treatment; and dynamic stability analyses of the vertical shaft in rock at the outlet works in support of the design of the new shaft liming.

Seismic Stability Evaluations for Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams, Santa Clara, CA – Dr. Moriwaki lead the characterization and dynamic analysis efforts for these two existing dams which are located within a few kilometers of the San Andreas Fault. Issues addressed during this evaluation included assessing foundation soil liquefaction potential and the characterization of shear strength and dynamic material properties for a complex zoned dam. The results of the dynamic stability analyses and interaction with DSOD resulted in minor remediation of Stevens Creek Dam and no remediation of Lenihan Dam, contrary to initial perceptions and expectations.



Page A-5

Rambod Hadidi, PhD, PE, GE • ASSOCIATE OFFICE: (714) 796-9100 • FAX: (714) 796-9191 • [email protected]


YEARS WITH FIRM: 2

EDUCATION

PhD, Civil Engineering, 2007

MS, Civil Engineering, 2003

BS, Civil Engineering, 1999

REGISTRATION



AFFILIATIONS




AREA OF EXPERTISE

Dr. Hadidi focuses his practice on topics related to:

Geotechnical Engineering




Numerical Analysis



Dr. Hadidi has many years of experience in geotechnical and earthquake engineering and numerical analysis on a wide range of infrastructure projects, for both private and public sectors, locally, nationally, and globally with a wide range of complexity and size. These projects cover infrastructure facilities such as dams, reservoirs, buildings, pipelines, roadways, airports, bridges, tunnels, and nuclear power plants. His expertise includes numerical modeling of geotechnical systems, earthquake engineering, geotechnical engineering and health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Dr. Hadidi has performed numerical modeling and analysis in support of evaluation, design, construction, and monitoring of infrastructure using many of the commercially available platforms (e.g. FLAC, PLAXIS, ANSYS, ABAQUS) as well as customized analysis routines developed in various development environments (MATLAB, Visual Basic, FISH, etc.). He has also published many articles on numerical analysis of seismically induced soil deformation and constitutive modeling.

Seismic Stability Evaluations for Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams, Santa Clara, CA – Dr. Hadidi carried out the dynamic analysis efforts for these two existing dams which are located within a few kilometers of the San Andreas Fault. Issues addressed during this evaluation included assessing foundation soil liquefaction potential and the characterization of shear strength and dynamic material properties for a complex zoned dam. The results of the dynamic stability analyses and interaction with DSOD resulted in minor remediation of Stevens Creek Dam and no remediation of Lenihan Dam, contrary to initial perceptions and expectations.

Headworks Reservoir, Los Angeles, CA – Senior engineer responsible for performing numerical soil-structure interaction analysis using FLAC and assisting in geologic hazard evaluation. Project includes geotechnical investigation and design recommendations for the proposed DSOD jurisdictional buried reinforced concrete water storage reservoir with the capacity of 110 million gallons, hydroelectric generation station and piping. The innovative approach to design included evaluation of the performance the reservoir through a soil-structure interaction analysis with simulated structure, evaluation of the response of the structure and attempt to achieve performance goals beyond the conventional code-based design.

Cerro Corona Tailings Dams, Cajamarca Hualgayoc, Peru – Senior Engineer for seismic stability evaluation and deformation analysis of three tailing dams on Las Aguilas, Gordas, and La Hiebra valleys. Increases in the height of the existing dams of various heights are being considered to accommodate the mining operations. The analysis included seismic stability evaluation and deformation analysis using FLAC to evaluate the response of the dam in the event of a major earthquake. The results are reviewed by a panel of experts and they will guide the design team in implementing the proposed height increases.



Page A-6

John A. Barneich, PE, GE • PRINCIPAL OFFICE: (714) 796-9100 • FAX: (714) 796-9191 •

[email protected]


YEARS WITH FIRM: 14

EDUCATION

University of California at Berkeley, M.S. Geotechnical Engineering, 1966

University of California at Berkeley, B.S. Civil Engineering, 1964

Registration



AFFILIATIONS



Structural Engineers Association of Southern California

Association of Dam Safety Officials

PUBLICATIONS

Author of many papers and technical reports on subjects related to:



Foundation Dynamics

Construction Vibration Evaluations

COMMUNITY SERVICE

United States Society of Dams (USSD), Member of Earthquake Committee

American Society of Civil Engineers, Past Chairman of the Los Angeles Section Energy Technical Group

ASCE City of Los Angeles Soil Nail and Permanent Tie Back Subcommittees to Set Practice Guidelines, Member


Mr. Barneich has 49 years of consulting experience in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, with emphasis on infrastructure facilities including: earth and rockfill dams, canals, pipelines, treatment facilities, power plants, bridges, roadways, and ports and harbors. For the last three decades Mr. Barneich has been involved in the seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing dams, and in the siting and design of new dams. Over this time period, he has worked on over 60 DSOD jurisdictional dams in California, many of which involved the need for and implementation of seismic retrofit strategies. Selected project experience include the following:

San Pablo Dam, Contra Costa, CA - Project Engineer for the final design and construction of the seismic upgrades of the 170-ft high San Pablo Dam. Mr. Barneich, carried out design work including a detailed seismic nonlinear deformation analysis of the dam to optimize the size, extent and mix design of deep soil mixing (DSM) stabilization of the downstream alluvium against seismic deformation and the sizing of and drainage provisions for proposed downstream buttress. Mr. Barneich was also involved in the complex characterization of the 1920 hydraulic fill and liquefiable alluvium beneath the dam for use in the nonlinear analysis. Developed site-specific response spectra of the MCE earthquake ground motions including the development of three acceleration-time histories consistent with DSOD requirements.

Stevens Creek and Lenihan Dams, Santa Clara, CA - Project Engineer for the field exploration and laboratory analysis programs. Subsequently, Mr. Barneich led the effort to characterize the embankment fill and foundation alluvium materials using many state-of-the-practice techniques with particular emphasis on assessing the liquefaction potential of the foundation alluvium.

Bouquet Canyon Dam Seismic Evaluation, Angeles National Forest, CA - Project Manager for the evaluation of the stability of Bouquet Dams 1 and 2. Under his direction the following subtasks were completed: a detailed data review of the Department files; a ground motion evaluation for the site; a field investigation including refraction and downhole seismic surveys, CPT soundings and exploration drilling; a liquefaction assessment; nonlinear seismic deformation analysis; equivalent linear seismic response analysis; seepage analysis; concept mitigation measures consisting of stone columns to reduce seismically induced deformation to adequate levels; geologic mapping of nearby faults; and estimate of potential offset due to fault movement and its impact on the stability of the dam.

Camanche Dam, Stockton, CA - Project Engineer of the seismic stability evaluation of the Camanche Dam near Stockton, California. This Dam was evaluated for the liquefaction potential of mine tailings and alluvium left in-place beneath the upstream and downstream shells of the dam. A deterministic seismic hazard analysis was carried out to develop ground motion parameters including 3 acceleration-time histories, and several parametric non-linear deformation analyses were performed using the finite difference computer program FLAC.



Page A-7

Richard Harlan, P.G., C.E.G. • SENIOR ENGINEERING

GEOLOGIST OFFICE: (888) 888-4730 • FAX: (888) 888-4731 • [email protected]


YEARS WITH FIRM: 8

EDUCATION

California State University, Chico: BA, Geology, 1985

REGISTRATION

Professional Geologist in California (1991) No. 5195 Certified Engineering Geologist in California (1991) No. 1653

AFFILIATIONS Association of Engineering Geologists

AREA OF EXPERTISE

Mr. Harlan focuses his practice on topics related to:

Engineering Geology

Field Exploration

Foundations

Earthquake and Fault Hazard Evaluation for Existing and Proposed Dams and Hydroelectric Projects


Mr. Harlan has over 29 years experience on projects involving earthfill and concrete water storage dams, tailings dams, levees, landfills, tunnels, pipelines, bridge and building foundations, land development, and groundwater studies. His work has involved the planning, performance and supervision of field exploration programs for feasibility-level studies through final design, identification of project hazards, development of design recommendations and report preparation. Construction observation and testing background on water resource projects has included dam foundation excavation inspection and mapping, foundation grouting inspection, and fill control including sand cone and nuclear density testing, and tunnel excavation mapping with blast monitoring. He has worked on numerous studies involving earthquake and fault hazard evaluations for existing and proposed dams and hydroelectric projects. Mr. Harlan has extensive experience in geologic investigations for a number of the hydroelectric projects on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada, including those immediately adjacent to the NID facilities. This work included FERC Part 12 and PFMA evaluations for the South Feather Power Project, Upper American River project, and Middle Fork American River project, seismic source characterization studies for the Upper American River Project, South Feather Power Project, and Stanislaus North Fork and Middle Fork projects, and various other dam and tunnel investigations involving those projects as well as Yuba County Water Agency's New Bullards Bar dam. Examples of Ms. Harlan’s specific experience includes engineering geology support for the following projects:

Santa Clara Valley Water District | Seismic Stability Evaluations for Lenihan and Stevens Creek Dams, Santa Clara, CA – Project Geologist. Responsible for in-depth review of previous analyses and construction documentation and conducted subsequent field investigations including geologic mapping, sonic and mud rotary drilling and sampling, Becker Penetration Testing, CPT and downhole shear wave testing of embankment and foundation materials. Mr. Harlan’s work focused on presenting a geologic model of foundation conditions for each of the dams, and involved frequent interaction with DSOD personnel to demonstrate that appropriate models had been developed. East Bay Municipal Utility District | Camanche Embankments Safety Review, San Joaquin County, CA – Project Geologist. Responsible for supervising all field work at Camanche Dam and six dikes including drilling and trenching for liquefaction and piping potential studies and installation of grouted-in vibrating-wire piezometers. Prepared detailed logs of borings and test pits and the geologic sections of the various reports developed by the project team. Conducted a photogeologic study to evaluate regional faulting. East Bay Municipal Utility District | San Pablo Dam Seismic Upgrades, El Sobrante, CA – Engineering Geologist. Responsible for detailed geologic mapping along 1-mile long fire trail on a hillside. Mr. Harlan also logged a number of rotary wash and core borings during the installation of the Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM) to assess the depth and characteristics of the rock underlying the liquefiable foundation materials and to evaluate the required depth of embedment of the CDSM shear walls constructed as part of the seismic upgrades.



Page A-8

Carola Di Alessandro, Ph.D • PROJECT SEISMOLOGIST OFFICE: (714) 796-9100 • FAX: (714) 796-9191 •

[email protected]


YEARS WITH FIRM: 3

EDUCATION

Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Italy: Ph.D, Applied Geophysics (2006)

Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Italy: M.S., Geological Science (2001)

AFFILIATIONS


PUBLICATIONS

Author of many papers and technical reports on subjects related to:

Ground Motion Evaluation

Seismic Hazard Analysis

Engineering Seismology

Stochastic ground-motion modeling

Digital Signal Processing

Local Site Effects Evaluation

Reviewer for several journals dealing with various aspects of engineering seismology


Dr. Di Alessandro has almost 15 years of experience in the field of engineering seismology, with emphasis on ground-motion evaluation and characterization. Her expertise encompasses several aspects of ground-motion analyses, including attenuation evaluation, ground motion selection and modification, stochastic ground-motion modeling, and signals processing. Past project experiences included technical management, coordination and technical support to ground motion characterization for critical facilities and for re-insurance industry.

Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Project – As Project Manager, Dr. Di Alessandro was responsible for the technical management of a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - mandated probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) evaluation for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP), the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), and the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS). The project involved managing and coordinating personnel and contractors from multiple Institutions, publishing the project’s results in comprehensive technical reports, providing technical support, securing efficient contractual and budgeting documentation, organizing formal workshops and web-meetings, and responding to request for information from Government Agencies involved with the review of the project outcomes. Other duties include reporting to the Sponsors on project’s progress, schedule, and budget, maintaining communication among project participants, review panel and funding agencies, disseminating project’s results at scientific meetings, and supporting the maintenance of the dedicated website.

PG&E Long Term Seismic Projects (ongoing) – Dr. Di Alessandro is a contributor to PG&E Geosciences projects and operations. In particular, she is supporting the planning, implementation and oversight of a multi-year multi-institution project devoted at improving the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for application to the PG&E service area.

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center Projects - As Post-doctoral Fellow, Dr. Di Alessandro was involved in the design and maintenance of the web-based NGA-West 1 ground motion database. She also served as the supporting manager for the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) ground motion characterization project, by supporting, coordinating, and integrating the activities of over 20 international ground-motion experts.

Italian Civil Defense Sponsored Projects – With multiple roles of registered professional geologist and research grant recipient, Dr. Di Alessandro carried out several projects in Italy including attenuation of ground displacement at national and regional scales, identification of anomalous sites and records, site response characterization, and compilation of microzonation guidelines for industrial-expansion areas.

http://www.unina.it/



Page B-1

ATTACHMENT B

BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

CAMANCHE RESERVOIR Mokelumne River, California

Background This project included a comprehensive safety review of the existing Camanche Reservoir Main Dam and associated Dikes. This study involved setup and execution of a field exploration and laboratory testing program which included rotary-wash borings, CPT probings, collection of downhole geophysical measurements, the installation of vibrating wire piezometers, and classification and characterization testing of soil samples. Following the field and laboratory programs, the study involved a characterization of embankment core and the mine tailings foundation material beneath the dam. This characterization was used in the FLAC non-linear seismic analysis which will be the basis for ground improvement recommendations. Seepage analyses using the PLAXIS software were also part of the design development. The project was completed successfully under DSOD and FERC jurisdiction.

TERRA and GeoPentech’s Role TGP provided geotechnical and earthquake engineering services for the design of the seismic upgrade of the dam and outlet tower. Prepare field exploration program consisting of drilling, SPT

testing, CPT soundings and down-hole geophysical measurements to characterize the foundation materials and core of the dam.

Developed site-specific response spectra of the MCE earthquake ground motions including the development of three acceleration-time histories consistent with DSOD requirements.

Stability and deformation evaluations of the existing dam embankment using the computer programs FLAC, and QUAD4MU for compatibility of seismic response.

The computer program SLOPEW was used to extrapolate the deformation results from FLAC to other sections on the dam considering the elements of the Makdisi-Seed and Bray & Travassarou simplified analysis procedure.

The program SURFER was used to develop three dimensional views of the dam and subsurface conditions and facilitated the development of cutting sections through the Dam in both the transverse and longitudinal directions.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Performance Period 2008-2010

Client East Bay Municipal Utility

District Oakland, CA

Mr. Atta Yiadom (510) 287-1044

Team Members Involved Bob Kirby

Rick Harlan Yoshi Moriwaki Rambod Hadidi Andrew Dinsick

Relevance Seismic Evaluation

Liquefaction Assessment Site Characterization Deformation Analysis Ground Motion Studies

CHABOT DAM SEISMIC UPGRADES San Leandro, California

Background Chabot Dam was initially constructed in 1875 and subsequently upgraded in 1892 and 1980. The project area is located approximately 2 miles east of the City of San Leandro and 10 miles southeast of the City of Oakland, California. In 2005, at the request of the California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), the District completed seismic stability evaluations of the dam and of the outlet works tower. The stability analyses indicated that shaking associated with the nearby Hayward Fault could cause local displacements of several feet in the hydraulically placed sluiced fill zone at the toe of the dam, in the direction of the downstream channel. In light of these findings, DSOD required seismic upgrades be implemented at the dam and outlet works. Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM) was selected as the preferred alternative to improve the dam embankment materials in the vicinity of the original downstream toe of the dam.

TERRA and GeoPentech’s Role TGP Team is providing geotechnical and earthquake engineering services for the design of the seismic upgrade of the dam and outlet tower. Field investigations consisting of rock coring and CPT

soundings for characterizing dam and foundation materials; Geologic field investigation and mapping; Geotechnical and seismic geotechnical engineering analysis for

the deformation and stability of the dam; Nonlinear deformation (FLAC) analysis for evaluation of

embankment performance when subjected to strong shaking coupled with equivalent linear site response analysis (QUAD4MU) of the main 2-D section of the dam.

Characterization of the CDSM treated soil for numerical modeling purposes

Optimization of the size, strength and layout of the CDSM using parametric FLAC analyses

Report preparation for regulatory agency review and approval.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Performance Period 2014-ongoing





Rick Harlan John Barniech

Yoshi Moriwaki Rambod Hadidi Andrew Dinsick



SAN PABLO DAM Contra Costa County, California

Background For the seismic upgrade of the existing 170-ft high San Pablo Dam, the design work involved the seismic nonlinear analysis of the dam to optimize the size, extent and mix design of deep soil mixing (DSM) stabilization of the downstream alluvium against seismic deformation and the sizing of and drainage provisions for proposed downstream buttress. It also involves a complex characterization of the 1920 hydraulic fill (core and shell) and 1978 upstream buttress fill elements of the existing dam as well as the alluvium beneath the dam for use in the nonlinear analysis. CPT and drilling field investigation of the dam, laboratory testing was used to re-characterize the shells of the dam that were assumed by previous investigators to be subject to liquefaction. As a result of the re-characterization, we were able to show that the shells were not liquefiable to the satisfaction of the owner and the DSOD. This re-characterization was used in the FLAC non-linear seismic analysis and resulted in a major reduction in the downstream buttress size negating the need to use a borrow area that imposed major environmental and constructability constraints to the project. Seepage analyses are also part of the design development. A full scale test section of the soil mix element is currently in the design optimization phase of the DSM stabilization of the alluvium.

TERRA and GeoPentech’s Role Design and interpretation of the field investigations consisting of

drilling, SPT testing, CPT soundings and the used of split Shelby tubes with CPT and SPT data to characterize the shells and core of the dam.

Developed site-specific response spectra of the MCE earthquake ground motions including the development of three acceleration-time histories consistent with DSOD requirements.

Stability and deformation evaluations of the existing dam embankment as well as several alternative mitigation geometries of combinations of DSM and downstream buttresses. Final deformation analyses were performed on the final selected combination of downstream DSM stabilization of the alluvium and buttress.

The computer program FLAC was used for numerous analyses of the deformation analyses of the original dam as well as mitigation sections and was checked against QUAD4MU for compatibility of seismic response.

The computer program SLOPEW was used to extrapolate the deformation results from FLAC to other sections on the dam considering the elements of the Makdisi-Seed simplified analysis procedure.

The program SURFER was used to develop three dimensional views of the dam and subsurface conditions and facilitated the development of cutting sections through the Dam in both the transverse and longitudinal directions.

PROJECT INFORMATION






John Barneich Yoshi Moriwaki Andrew Dinsick



STEVENS CREEK AND LENIHAN DAMS Santa Clara, California

Background The seismic safety evaluation of Stevens Creek and Lenihan Dams for the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) consists of three phases; review of existing data, field exploration and laboratory analysis, and engineering analysis of the dams during the expected earthquake loading. Of particular interest, was the seismic stability, in particular when there is a potential for liquefaction induced deformation such as at Stevens Creek Dam.

TERRA and GeoPentech’s Role Terra/GeoPentech provided geotechnical services for the seismic safety review of the dams referenced above. Services included:

The review of existing data involving examining records kept by the SCVWD, records collected by the DSOD, and publicly available data.

Field exploration program was designed to make maximum use of existing information and use the most up-to-date methods available to fill in the gaps and provide sound engineering analysis. The field exploration programs included mud rotary borings with standard penetration testing, sonic borings, cone penetrometer testing, Becker borings (Becker penetration tests) and OYO suspension logging of the mud rotary holes

Developed site-specific response spectra of ground motions for the maximum local event and maximum event on the San Andreas including the development of six acceleration-time histories consistent with DSOD requirements.

Stability and seismic deformation evaluations of the existing dam embankments were performed using various techniques and scenarios. Prior to drilling, preliminary deformation analyses were performed to guide the field investigation.

Evaluation of mitigation measures as appropriate for controlling seismic deformation of the embankment and foundation soils;

Regulatory agency review and approval.

PROJECT INFORMATION


Client Santa Clara Valley Water

District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, CA 95118-3686

Mr. Steven Wu (408) 265-2607


Rick Harlan Yoshi Moriwaki John Barneich

Rambod Hadidi Andrew Dinsick


Liquefaction Assessment Site Characterization Deformation Analysis Ground Motion Studies Ground Improvement

BOUQUET CANYON DAMS Angeles National Forest, California

Background GeoPentech was awarded contract by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADPW) to provide geotechnical engineering services, to evaluate the seismic stability of two dams impounding Bouquet Canyon reservoir, located in the Angeles National Forest, North of Los Angeles. The main dam (called Bouquet #1) is an existing 190-ft. high earthfill dam constructed in 1934. A second earthfill (called Bouquet #2) that is 48-ft high located on the north side of the reservoir also constructed in 1934. During an earlier study of LADWP’s 17 dams located in the Los Angeles basin completed by key GeoPentech personnel these two Dams were identified as two Dams that required more detailed evaluation with Bouquet #1 having potentially liquefiable Alluvium left in place below the downstream shell and uncertain seismic stability and Bouquet #2 having a potential fault rupture hazard.

GeoPentech’s Role GeoPentech is providing geotechnical and earthquake engineering services for the evaluation of these dams. Field investigations consisting of drilling, SPT testing, CPT

soundings, instrumented BPT testing and Sonic coring for liquefaction evaluations and sampling for laboratory testing;

Geologic field investigation and fault mapping; Geotechnical and seismic geotechnical engineering analysis for


embankment performance when subjected to strong shaking from the nearby San Andreas faults based on controlling seismic deformation due to high pore pressures generated in the alluvial foundation soils;

Coupled equivalent linear site response analysis (QUAD 4MU) of the main 2-D section of the dam using various assumptions regarding material properties, groundwater conditions, and ground motion characteristics.

Evaluation of surface faulting consequences (potential fault displacements) on the stability of Dam #2;


PROJECT INFORMATION

Performance Period 2003-ongoing

Client Los Angeles Department of

Water and Power Los Angeles, CA Dr. Jianping Hu

(213) 367-0942

Team Members Involved Yoshi Moriwaki Rambod Hadidi Andrew Dinsick



PALOS VERDES RESERVOIR Rancho Palos Verdes, California

Background GeoPentech was awarded contract by the Metropolitan Water Power (MWD) to provide geotechnical engineering services, to evaluate the seismic stability of the existing Palos Verdes reservoir. The Palos Verdes Reservoir is located in Rolling Hills Estates, California, on the Palos Verdes Peninsula about 1 mile south of the City of Torrance and 22 miles south of the City of Los Angeles. The purpose of this study was to: (1) summarize the complex geology of the site; (2) describe the characteristics of the dam and foundation materials and; (3) perform nonlinear seismic deformation analysis using FLAC to evaluate the performance of the reservoir under high seismic loading conditions.

GeoPentech’s Role GeoPentech is providing geotechnical and earthquake engineering services for the evaluation of the existing reservoir, compacted earthfill dam and outlet tower. Field investigations consisting of drilling, SPT testing, CPT

soundings for liquefaction evaluations and sampling for laboratory testing;

Geologic field investigation and landslide mapping; Geotechnical and seismic geotechnical engineering analysis for


embankment performance when subjected to strong shaking from the nearby (closest distance less than 1 km) Palos Verdes Fault;

Coupled equivalent linear site response analysis (QUAD4MU) of two 2-D analysis sections; one through the maximum section of the embankment dam and one through the abutment and outlet tower.

Evaluation of landslide consequences at the southwest corner of the reservoir;


PROJECT INFORMATION


Client Metropolitan Water District of

Southern California 700 North Alameda Street

Los Angeles, California 90012 Mr. Christopher Hill

(213) 217-7969

Team Members Involved Yoshi Moriwaki John Barneich

Rambod Hadidi Andrew Dinsick





Page C‐1

ATTACHMENT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

CERTIFICATE HOLDER

© 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

ACORD 25 (2014/01)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

CANCELLATION

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

LOCJECTPRO-

POLICY

GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

OCCURCLAIMS-MADE

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $DAMAGE TO RENTED

EACH OCCURRENCE $

MED EXP (Any one person) $

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $

GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $

$RETENTIONDED

CLAIMS-MADE

OCCUR

$

AGGREGATE $

EACH OCCURRENCE $UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

INSRLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS

PERSTATUTE

OTH-ER

E.L. EACH ACCIDENT

E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE

E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT

$

$

$

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE

If yes, describe underDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below

(Mandatory in NH)OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

ANY AUTO

ALL OWNED SCHEDULED

HIRED AUTOSNON-OWNED

AUTOS AUTOS

AUTOS

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

BODILY INJURY (Per person)

BODILY INJURY (Per accident)

PROPERTY DAMAGE $

$

$

$

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIODINDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THISCERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSDADDL

WVDSUBR

N / A

$

$

(Ea accident)

(Per accident)

OTHER:

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES

BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to

the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the

certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

INSURED

PHONE(A/C, No, Ext):

PRODUCER

ADDRESS:E-MAIL

FAX(A/C, No):

CONTACTNAME:

NAIC #

INSURER A :

INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

5/21/2015

Dealey, Renton & AssociatesDRA License 0020739P. O. Box 10550Santa Ana, CA 92711

GeoPentech525 N. Cabrillo Park Drive, Suite 280Santa Ana CA 92701

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecti

Travelers Property Casualty Co of A

Sentinel Insurance Co. LTD

Berkley Insurance Company

25682

25674

11000

32603

Sherall Gradias

714 427-6810 714 427-6818

GEOPENTEC

225755776

A Y Y 6802071L380 6/5/2015 6/5/2016 2,000,000

2,000,000

10,000

1,000,000

4,000,000

4,000,000

X

X

X

Contractual Liab

X

B Y Y

X

X X

BA4459L622 6/5/2015 6/5/2016 1,000,000

B X X CUP6459Y232 6/5/2015 6/5/2016 5,000,000

5,000,000

C 72WEGEX7841 6/1/2015 6/1/2016 X

1,000,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

Y

D ProfessionalLiabilityClaims Made

AEC900489000 5/15/2015 6/5/2016 $5,000,000 per claim$5,000,000 annl aggr.

General Liab. excludes claims arising out of the performance of professional services. Umbrella policy is following form for general, auto andemployers liability. Umbrella Following Form Excludes Professional Liability. Cross Liability or severability of interest included in generalliability.

30 Days notice/10 Days nonpay

PROPOSAL

CG D3 82 09 07 Page 1© 2007 The Travelers Companies, Inc.

Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office Inc., with its permission

POLICY NUMBER: COMMERICAL GENERAL LIABILITY ISSUE DATE:

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED (ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS)

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE

NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ORGANIZATION(S):

PROJECT/LOCATION OF COVERED OPERATIONS:

PROVISIONS A. The following is added to WHO IS AN INSURED

(Section II): The person or organization shown in the Sched-ule above is an additional insured on this Cover-age Part, but only with respect to liability for bod-ily injury”, ‘property damage” or ‘personal injury caused, in whole or in part, by your acts or omis -sions or the acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf:

a. In the performance of your ongoing oper-ations;

b. In connection with premises owned by or rented to you; or

C. In connection with your work and included within the “products -completed operations hazard.”

Such person or organization does not qualify as an additional insured for “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal injury’ for which that person or organization has assumed liability in a contract or agreement.

The insurance provided to such additional insured is limited as follows:

d. This insurance does not apply to the render-ing of or failure to render any “professional services”.

e. The limits of insurance afforded to the addi-tional insured shall be the limits which you agreed in that ‘contract or agreement requir-ing insurance” to provide for that additional insured, or the limits shown in the Declarations for this Coverage Part, whichever are less. This endorsement does not increase the limits of insurance stated in the LIMITS OF INSURANCE (Section III) for this Coverage Part.

B. The following is added to Paragraph a. of 4. Other Insurance in COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS (Section IV): However, if you specifically agree in a contract or agreement requiring insurance that, for the addi-tional insured shown in the Schedule, the insur-ance provided to that additional insured under this

PROPOSAL

5/21/2015

General Liab. excludes claims arising out of the performance ofprofessional services. Umbrella policy is following form for general,auto and employers liability. Umbrella Following Form ExcludesProfessional Liability. Cross Liability or severability of interest

6802071L380

COMMERICAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CG D3 82 09 07 Page 2© 2007 The Travelers Companies, Inc.

Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office Inc., with its permission

Coverage Part must apply on a primary

basis, or a primary and non-contributory basis, this insurance is primary to other insurance that is available to such additional

insured which covers such additional insured as a named insured, and we will not share with the other insurance, provided that:

(1) The “bodily injury” or “property damage” for which coverage is sought occurs;

and

(2) The “personal injury” for which coverage

is sought arises out of an offense committed;

after you have entered into that “contract or agreement requiring insurance” for such additional insured. But this insurance still is

excess over valid and collectible other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the additional insured when the

additional insured is also an additional insured under any other insurance.

C. The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us in COMMERCIAL GENERAL

LIABILITY CONDITIONS (Section IV):

We waive any rights of recovery we may

have against the additional insured shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for “bodily injury”, “property

damage” or “personal

injury” arising out of “your work” on or for the

project, or at the location, shown in the Schedule above, performed by you, or on your behalf, under a “contract or agreement

requiring insurance” with that additional insured. We waive these rights only where you have agreed to do so as part of the

“contract or agreement requiring insurance” with that additional insured entered into by you before, and in effect when, the “bodily

injury” or “property damage” occurs, or the “personal injury” offense is committed.

D. The following definition is added to DEFINITIONS (Section V):

“Contract or agreement requiring insurance” means that part of any contract or agreement under which you are required to

include the person or organization shown in the Schedule as an additional insured on this Coverage Part, provided that the “bodily injury” and “property damage” occurs, and

the “personal injury” is caused by an offense committed:

a. After you have entered into that contract or agreement;

b. While that part of the contract or agreement is in effect; and

c. Before the end of the policy period.


TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mike Glaze, General Manager DATE: May 19, 2016 RE: Agreement for Yellowhammer Drive Surface Restoration Project Agenda Item for 5/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting It has been previously reported that on January 29th the Agency’s on-call operator received a callout on a mainline break on Yellow Hammer Drive. Although the crew efficiently repaired the leak, significant roadway and sub-grade damage occurred as a result of the nature of the break. Approximately 3.200 square feet of roadway needs to be repaired, including removal and disposal of existing roadway pavement, importation and placement of 30 tons of aggregate base, and resurfacing the street with asphalt concrete. The attached Request for Bids was sent to four general contractors listed below on May 11, including the attached Agreement for Yellow Hammer Drive Surface Restoration Project, SFWPA Project No. 2016-0158:

• Duke Sherwood Contracting, Oroville; • RRHorn General Contractors, Chico; • D&S Asphalt Company, Oroville; • Fairbanks Paving Company, Oroville.

Three bidders responded prior to the deadline of close-of-business, May 17, 2016. Their bids were as follows:

• RRHorn General Contractors – $19,715; • Duke Sherwood Contracting – $19,024; • D&S Asphalt Company – $15,717.

D&S Asphalt Company did not meet the minimum insurance requirements and therefore was determined to be a non-qualified bidder. Based on qualifications, bid amount, experience with similar projects, work plan, and schedule, staff is recommend the project be awarded to Duke Sherwood Contracting. Since the project costs are significantly greater than the Agency’s $10,000 insurance deductible, a claim has been filed with ACWA/JPIA.

The recommended action is:

“I move approval of, and authorization for the General Manager to execute a contract, subject to legal counsel’s approval, with Duke Sherwood Contracting for the Yellow Hammer Drive Surface Restoration Project.”

-1-

AGREEMENT FOR YELLOW HAMMER DRIVE SURFACE RESTORATION PROJECT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 24th day of May, 2016, by and between South Feather Water and Power Agency (SFWPA), and Duke Sherwood Contracting (CONTRACTOR). WITNESSETH:

SFWPA desires to retain the services of CONTRACTOR to repair damage to Yellow Hammer Drive in the vicinity of its intersection with Tyme Way, Oroville, California (SFWPA Project No. 2016-0158), resulting from a break in South Feather Water and Power Agency’s water main, as described in the Agency’s Request for Bids (attached hereto as Exhibit “B”) for said project dated May 11, 2016.

CONTRACTOR desires to perform the services requested by SFWPA on the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows. 1. Contract Documents: This Contract shall include this Agreement, and Exhibits “A,” “B”

and “C”, attached hereto, which are incorporated herein.

2. Description of Work: CONTRACTOR shall perform the work described in the Contractor’s Proposal, attached as Exhibit “C” hereto.

CONTRACTOR shall provide all labor, equipment, material, supplies, and services required or necessary to properly, competently and completely perform the work under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall determine the method, details and means of doing the work. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all materials incorporated into the work shall be new.

3. Compensation: Contract price is $19,024.00 (lump sum). 4. Term and Time for Completion: This Agreement shall become effective on the date first

above written and will continue in effect until the services provided herein have been completed. CONTRACTOR shall complete the work within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement.

5. Payment for Services: Upon completion of the project, as described in Exhibit “B”, CONTRACTOR shall invoice SFWPA for said work. Payment by SFWPA will be due net 30 days from the date of invoice, less 10% retention. Within sixty (60) days after the date of completion of the work of improvement, the retention withheld shall be released. In the event of a dispute between SFWPA and CONTRACTOR, the Agency may withhold from the final payment an amount not to exceed 150 percent of the disputed amount. For purposes of this subdivision, "completion" means any of the occurrences set forth at Public Contract Code section 7107 Subds. (c)(1)-(4). Acceptance of SFWPA’s final payment by CONTRACTOR shall constitute

-2-

a complete release and waiver of all claims of CONTRACTOR except disputed claims identified in writing by CONTRACTOR prior to final payment.

The payment schedule is a negotiated item and supersedes the payment terms stated in CONTRACTOR's proposal (Exhibit “C” hereto). The making of the first payment by SFWPA shall not constitute acceptance or approval of any work prior to final completion and acceptance.

CONTRACTOR’s invoice shall be accompanied by proof that CONTRACTOR has paid for all materials billed to SFWPA, and by CONTRACTOR's certification that all labor and services related to the project, to date, have been paid.

6. Coordination; Project Meetings: It is understood and acknowledged that SFWPA's activities

will continue during the project and that SFWPA will need adequate notice from CONTRACTOR if it becomes necessary to take components of SFWPA’s domestic water distribution system off-line in connection with CONTRACTOR's work. CONTRACTOR and SFWPA agree to coordinate their schedules insofar as possible to minimize interference with one another. A project coordination meeting shall be held between CONTRACTOR and SFWPA prior to commencement of work. In addition, project meetings shall be held upon request of either SFWPA or CONTRACTOR provided that at least 24 hours’ written notice is given. The costs of project coordination and project meetings are included in the contract price.

7. General Insurance: CONTRACTOR shall, at its expense, maintain in effect at all times during the duration of this Agreement not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance.

a. Worker's Compensation. CONTRACTOR shall carry such insurance as will protect SFWPA and CONTRACTOR from claims under Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability Acts; such insurance to be maintained as to the type and amount in strict compliance with State statutes.

b. General Liability. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and keep in full force and effect general liability insurance including provisions for contractual liability, personal injury, independent contractors and broad form property damage coverages. This insurance shall be on a Commercial General Liability form with a standard cross-liability clause or endorsement. The limit for this insurance shall be no less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. CONCTRACTOR’s insurance secured under this subparagraph shall name by endorsement SFWPA as an additional insured. The general liability insurance policy shall include a provision requiring the policy of the named insured to be applied, in full, before any insurance separately and independently maintained by SFWPA shall be invoked.

c. Automobile Liability. CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance with coverage for any vehicle including those owned, leased rented or borrowed. This insurance shall have a standard cross-liability clause or endorsement. The limit amount for this insurance shall be no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. Contractor’s insurance secured under this subparagraph shall name by endorsement SFWPA as an additional insured. The general liability insurance policy shall include a provision requiring the policy of the named insured to be applied, in full, before any insurance separately and independently maintained by SFWPA shall be invoked.

-3-

d. "Builder's Risk" (All Risk). Coverage for the full insurable value of CONTRACTOR's materials and improvements at the worksite.

e. Certificate of Insurance. Promptly upon execution of this Agreement and prior to commencement of any work, CONTRACTOR shall provide SFWPA with certificates of insurance evidencing that all insurance and the endorsements referred to above and required by this Agreement have been obtained and are in full force and effect. Approval of the insurance by SFWPA shall not relieve or decrease any liability of CONTRACTOR. The certificates and policies shall provide that thirty (30) days’ written notice of any material change, reduction in coverage or cancellation of the insurance policies will be provided to SFWPA. In addition, in the event any change is made in the insurance carrier, policies or nature of coverage required under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall notify SFWPA prior to making such changes.

8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless: CONTRACTOR shall protect, indemnify, hold harmless and defend SFWPA, its Directors, officers, employees and agents, from any and all claims, fines, demands, costs, expenses (including but not limited to attorney's fees and costs of litigation or arbitration), liability, losses, penalties, causes of action, awards, suits or judgments for damages of any nature whatsoever (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Claims”) to the extent arising out of the breach of this agreement in whole or in part by, or willful or fraudulent misconduct or negligent acts, errors or omissions by CONTRACTOR, its employees, agents or contractors, or the agent, employee or contractor of any one of them in the performance of their duties or in their operations under this Agreement, but not including the sole or active negligence or the willful misconduct of SFWPA. Neither termination of the Agreement nor completion of the acts to be performed under this Agreement shall release CONTRACTOR from its obligations to indemnify as to any Claims so long as the event upon which such Claim is predicated shall have occurred prior to the effective date of any such termination or completion and arose out of or was in any way connected with performance or operations under this Agreement by CONTRACTOR, its employees, agents or consultants, or the employee, agent or CONTRACTOR of any one of them. Submission of insurance certificates or other proof of compliance with the insurance requirements in the Agreement does not relieve CONTRACTOR from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. The obligation of this indemnity article shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

9. Warranty and Repair: CONTRACTOR warrants all work performed under this Agreement to be free from defects in materials and workmanship and for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance. CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, with its workers and equipment, repair or replace defects in material and workmanship found to exist on the project, upon demand of SFWPA or the City of Oroville. In addition, all manufacturers' warranties shall be assignable, and shall inure to SFWPA and to the City of Oroville. These warranty provisions are negotiated and supersede the provisions in CONTRACTOR's quotation attached hereto as Exhibit “C”. CONTRACTOR’S warranty to repair and replace defective materials and workmanship within one year shall not otherwise limit the period during

-4-

which SFWPA may seek relief under the laws and statutes of limitations applicable to breach of a written contract.

10. Exhibits Incorporated: Exhibits “B” and “C” attached to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.

11. Miscellaneous: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto and shall be binding on their successors and assigns. However, CONTRACTOR will not assign this Agreement without the written consent of SFWPA. No modification of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing signed by both parties. A waiver of any term, or any breach, of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term or breach. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable, the remainder shall be severable and not affected thereby. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

12. Notices: Insofar as this Agreement requires or contemplates the giving of notices, such notices shall be deemed given when personally delivered in writing or facsimile transmission, or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, as follows:

To SFWPA:

Michael C. Glaze, General Manager South Feather Water and Power Agency P.O. Box 581 Oroville, California 95966 [email protected]

To CONTRACTOR:

Duke Sherwood Contracting 495 Stimpson Road Oroville, California 95965

-5-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. SOUTH FEATHER WATER AND POWER

AGENCY

By Michael C. Glaze, General Manager

DUKE SHERWOOD CONTRACTING

By

CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE No.

-6-

EXHIBIT “A” GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Independent Contractor: CONTRACTOR's relationship to SFWPA is that of an independent

contractor. All persons hired by CONTRACTOR and performing the work shall be CONTRACTOR’s employees or agents. SFWPA shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wages or other claims by any such employees or agents or any other person by reason of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be solely liable for losses, costs, damage or injuries by said employees or agents during the course of the work. CONTRACTOR shall not delegate any of the work to subcontractors without advance written approval (fax or email acceptable) of SFWPA.

2. Labor; Wages; Safety:

a. All work shall be performed by skilled trade persons qualified to perform the required work in a manner comparable with the best standards of practice.

b. CONTRACTOR, and any subcontractor, in accordance with the provisions of California Labor

Code section 1770 et. seq. shall pay not less than the general prevailing rate of wages and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in the locality in which any work deemed to be “Public Work” in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code section 1720 is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the public work. The prevailing rates on wages shall be as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. Copies of the published prevailing rates are on file at SFWPA's main office.

c. CONTRACTOR shall be subject to and shall abide by all applicable provisions of the Labor

Code, including, but not limited to, Section 1775 (forfeitures for failure to pay prevailing wages), Section 1776 (payroll records), Section 1777.5 (apprentices), and Sections 1810-1815 (working hours).

d. In accordance with generally accepted practices and in accordance with California State Safety

Orders, CONTRACTOR will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job site, including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work. This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours.

3. Drug-Free Workplace: CONTRACTOR shall ensure that its employees on the work, and the

employees of its subcontractors, if any, conform to SFWPA's policies regarding a drug-free workplace and comply with all state and federal laws and regulations governing maintenance of a drug-free workplace.

4. Laws and Regulations; Permits:

-7-

a. CONTRACTOR shall ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, federal and state safety orders, local ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over construction of the project, and they will be deemed to be included in the contract the same as though herein written out in full.

b. Any and all permits from local government entities shall be the responsibility of the

CONTRACTOR. 5. Underground Facilities: SFWPA is unaware of any underground facilities within the worksite, other

than its own. CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for locating and identifying any underground facilities before conducting any trenching or excavation, and for ensuring the protection of any such facilities during construction. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Labor Code Section 6705 regarding trench safety.

6. Unforeseen Conditions. Contractor shall promptly, and before such conditions are disturbed, notify

SFWPA in writing of (1) any hazardous waste, (2) any subsurface or latent conditions differing from those indicated, or (3) any unknown and unusual conditions not ordinarily encountered or inherent in the work.

7. Storage of Equipment and Materials; Cleanup: CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for any

equipment or materials wherever they may be stored, and SFWPA will bear no responsibility, nor accountability whatsoever, for any damages or losses. CONTRACTOR shall keep the worksite in a neat and orderly condition and, upon completion, shall thoroughly clean the site and remove and dispose of all debris.

8. Extra Work:

a. Although the work is intended to be a turn-key project, SFWPA reserves the right at any time during the course of the contract to order the CONTRACTOR to perform extra work, furnish extra material or equipment, or to make changes altering, adding to, or deducting from the work, without invalidating the contract or bonds. Changes shall not be binding upon either SFWPA or the CONTRACTOR unless made in writing in accordance with this section.

b. Changes shall originate with SFWPA who will transmit to the CONTRACTOR a written request

for a proposal covering the requested change, and setting forth the work in detail. Upon receipt of such request, CONTRACTOR shall promptly submit in writing to SFWPA a proposal offering to perform such change, a request for any required extension of time caused by such change, and an itemized statement of the cost or credit for the proposed change. Failure of CONTRACTOR to include a request for extension of time in the proposal shall constitute conclusive evidence that such extra work or revisions will entail no delay and that no extension of time will be required.

-8-

c. If CONTRACTOR's proposal is accepted and authorized by SFWPA, a written Change Order will be issued by SFWPA stating that the extra work or change authorized, and granting any required adjustments of contract price and of time of completion.

d. SFWPA may order CONTRACTOR, by a written Change Order, to perform extra work or to

make changes on a cost-plus basis. Such Change Order shall specify the estimated amount of the payment to be made and the time extension to be allowed for such work or changes. CONTRACTOR shall perform such work and shall furnish SFWPA with itemized bills only for the actual cost of labor, materials, equipment use, transportation, tools, necessary incidentals, and insurance, plus a charge not exceeding 15 percent (15%) of the actual cost of the foregoing items to cover all other expenses and profit of CONTRACTOR and subcontractors for such work or changes.

e. The performance of extra work or changes pursuant to Change Order shall be in accordance

with this Agreement (and any bonds). No extra work shall be performed and no change shall be made unless pursuant to such written Change Order, and no claim for an addition to the contract price shall be valid unless so ordered.

f. If CONTRACTOR has any claims for extra work, delays, disruption or damages against

SFWPA, such claims shall be made in writing, with supporting data, to SFWPA within ten (10) days of the first occurrence or condition giving rise to the claim. Such claims shall be processed by SFWPA as requests for change orders under this General Condition 8. Failure of CONTRACTOR to give written notice as provided in this paragraph shall be deemed a waiver of such claim.

9. Dispute Resolution; Venue: To the extent that they are applicable, the provisions of Public Contract

Code Section 20104-20104.6 shall govern the resolution of claims under this Agreement. Said provisions, which call for written claims, responses, negotiations, mediation and arbitration, are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Venue for any arbitration or action to enforce this Agreement shall be in the County of Butte, State of California.

10. Termination: SFWPA may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason upon fourteen

(14) days advance written notice. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR is to be compensated for all work performed to the date of termination based upon Article 4 of this Agreement, including non-cancelable purchases of materials and equipment, provided that such compensation shall not exceed the contract price set forth in Article 2 hereof. Compensation under this paragraph shall not include costs related to lost profit associated with the expected completion of the work or other such payments relating to the benefit of the bargain.

11. Assignment: CONTRACTOR hereby offers and agrees to assign to SFWPA all rights, title, and

interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 1670] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials

-9-

pursuant to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the SFWPA tenders final payment to CONTRACTOR, without further acknowledgement by the parties.

12. Noncollusion Affidavit: In accordance with Section 7106 of the California Public Contract Code, the

bidder declares under penalty of perjury that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any matter, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or of the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.

13. Workers' Compensation Certificate: By signing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR certifies as follows:

“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”

SOUTH FEATHER WATER & POWER AGENCY MATT COLWELL, WATER DIVISION MANAGER 2310 ORO-QUINCY HIGHWAY OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966 530-533-4578, EXT. 112 [email protected]

May 19, 2016

REQUEST FOR BIDS

Yellow Hammer Drive Roadway Repairs, Project No. 2016-0158

South Feather Water and Power Agency (SFWPA) is requesting bid proposals for roadway repair located on Yellow Hammer Drive, Berry Creek Rancheria, Oroville, California. The project will include demolition and replacement of approximately 140 feet longitudinal by 22 foot width (3200 sf) of roadway (reference attached diagram). The repair section is intended to emulate the existing roadway conditions in slope and gradient prior to damage and is bound by curb and gutter. An 8-inch c900 water main ruptured and the water flow scoured and undermined the roadway creating voids and compromised sub-grade. The road section is currently failing and will need to be repaired within 30 days of contract agreement. Bids received on or prior to May 17th, 5:00pm will be considered for the project work. Bid submittals will consider the following work tasks which are intended to complete the project objectives. The bid submittal should not be limited to these specific tasks if additional tasks are required to complete the project and result in additional anticipated costs. Task:

1. Mobilization 2. Removal of existing asphalt concrete roadway and shoulder. Off-site disposal of

approximately 140 feet longitudinal and 22 foot width of existing roadway AC. 3. Import approximately 30 tons of ¾ inch class II aggregate base (assume 1-2 inches depth at 150 pcf). 4. Grade and compact sub-grade to 95% relative compaction in roadway sections 5. Place and compact ½ inch AC to a depth of approximate 3 inches to match existing.

The State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations has established the general prevailing rates of wages and rates for overtime and legal holidays in the locality in which the work is to be performed. Not less than said prevailing wages shall be paid for work on this project. Copies of such prevailing wages are on the web at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm.

Proposals will be evaluated based on experience with similar projects and bid price, which shall be given such weight as SFWPA, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate to determine the firm which best meets the need for SFWPA.

REQUEST FOR BIDS PROJECT NO. 2011-0108 PAGE 2

For more information please contact Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager, at 530.534.2238, [email protected].

If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, South Feather Water and Power Agency

Matt Colwell, Water Division Manager c: Michael C. Glaze, General Manager

Yellow Hammer Drive Roadway RepairFromBid Date:

Time: 5:00PM5/17/2016

Duke Sherwood Contracting Inc.

LN: 327827 Type: A495 Stimpson Rd , Oroville, CA 95965

South Feather Water& Power(530) 533-2710 Fax: (530) 846-6760Quote Number: 149-16 Phone:

2016-0158Project No.

Proposal for: Page 1 of 1

Total PriceUnitItem Unit PriceDescription Quantity

1,723.0001 Mobilization LS 1,723.00001.002,929.0002 Demo Existing Roadway AC LS 2,929.00001.003,816.0003 Finish Grade And Compact Existing

Subgrade And Add 30 Ton ABLS 3,816.00001.00

10,556.0004 Pave TON 182.000058.00

19,024.00Total:

! = Zero Total Price= Locked Bid-Item

Estimator: Doug Sherwood Generated by a SharpeSoft Product


TO: Public Recipients of Agenda Information FROM: Michael Glaze, General Manager DATE: May 20, 2016 RE: Anticipated Litigation Closed Session Agenda Item for 5/24/16 Board of Directors Meeting The information provided to Directors for this agenda item is not available to the public. The purpose for this item is to give the Board an opportunity to confer with legal counsel about litigation the Agency is anticipating. The Board is permitted by law (Brown Act) to confidentially discuss information that might prejudice its legal position. Such discussions are exempt from the Brown Act’s requirement that matters before the Board be discussed in public. Attendance during the closed-session will be limited to directors, together with such support staff and legal counsel as determined necessary by directors for each subject under discussion.