Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV1
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Performance Of SOQPSK And Multi-h CPM In The Presence Of
Adjacent Channel Interference
Terrance J. HillNova Engineering, Inc.,
Cincinnati, OH
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV2
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Outline• Waveform definitions (briefly!)• Spectral characterizations of telemetry waveforms• Effects of IF filtering on link performance• Aggregate effect of adjacent channel interference
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV3
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Why These Waveforms?• Advanced Range Telemetry (ARTM) Program
– Before ARTM (Tier 0?)• PCM/FM• “Legacy” waveform for telemetry
– ARTM Tier 1• Proprietary Feher-patented FQPSK-B, Revision A1• SOQPSK is
– Comparable in performance to FQPSK-B, Revision A1– Non-proprietary
– ARTM Tier 2 • Multi-h CPM (M=4, L=3RC, h1 = 4/16, h2 = 5/16)
• SOQPSK and Multi-h CPM are continuous phase modulations
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV4
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
CPM Waveforms
• Constant envelope, information is carried entirely in the phase• PSD and BER can be “traded” by
– Varying h, modulation index– Changing g(t), the frequency pulse shape
• FQPSK-B (Revision A1) is not truly a CPM waveform because of its AM component
-∞< t
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV5
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Offset QPSK Variations
• Unshaped
• Rectangular– MIL-STD-188-18x
• “Shaped”– Arbitrary g(t)
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV6
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK• MIL-STD-188-181, -182 • Continuous phase modulation, h = 1/4, g(t) = rectangle• Constant envelope• Three rates of phase change: 0, +∆f, -∆f
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV7
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Definition of SOQPSK-A, -B
g(t) = n(t) * w(t), where
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV8
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Frequency Pulse Shape, g(t)
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV9
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Power Spectral Density
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV10
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK-A Eye Pattern
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV11
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK-B Eye Pattern
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV12
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Definition of Multi-h CPM
-∞< t
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV13
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Key CPM Parameters
• M – Order of Modulation (2-ary, 4-ary, etc.)• g(t) - Frequency Pulse (Rectangular, Raised Cosine, etc.)• L – Length of Frequency Pulse• h – Modulation Index
• Results here are for M=4, L=3RC, h1 = 4/16, h2 = 5/16
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV14
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Frequency Pulse and Phase Tree
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV15
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
PSD Comparison
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV16
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
PSD is Half the Story• Overall spectral efficiency is determined by spacing
between channels• Receiver selectivity affects channel spacing• A valid comparison must account for both transmitted
spectrum and “tolerable” receiver filtering• Not all modulations are equally “tolerant” of IF filtering
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV17
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK-AWide IF
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV18
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK-ANarrow IF
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV19
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK-BWide IF
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV20
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
SOQPSK-BNarrow IF
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV21
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV22
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV23
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Experimental Setup
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV24
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV25
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
9 Mbps SOQPSK-A, Multichannel
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV26
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
9 Mbps Multi-h CPM, Multichannel
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV27
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV28
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV29
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV30
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV31
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV32
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV33
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV34
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV35
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Summary
Sheet1
ModulationChannel spacing for 1 dB loss at I/S ratio = 0 dBChannel spacing for 1 dB loss at I/S ratio = 10 dBChannel spacing for 1 dB loss at I/S ratio = 20 dBEb/N0 for BER = 1.0e-5, with I/S ratio = 20 dB
SOQPSK-A--1.11 bit rates14.5 dB
SOQPSK-B1.0 bit rates1.4 bit rates1.50 bit rates12.0 dB
Multi-h CPM--0.77 bit rates12.0 dB
Sheet2
Sheet3
ITC/USA 2001October 22-25, 2001, Las Vegas, NV36
www.nova-eng.com513-642-3000
Conclusions• SOQPSK and Multi-h CPM offer substantial reduction in
bandwidth over PCM/FM, with little or no penalty in BER.• SOQPSK-B is largely insensitive to IF filtering, while
SOQPSK-A is more “delicate”• SOQPSK-B offers better detection efficiency than
SOQPSK-A, at the expense of slightly greater bandwidth• Multi-h CPM offers almost 50% more bps / Hz than
SOQPSK-A, and 2.5 dB better detection efficiency.• Multi-h CPM nearly doubles the bps / Hz of SOQPSK-B,
with the same detection efficiency.
Performance Of SOQPSK And Multi-h CPM In The Presence Of Adjacent Channel Interference���Terrance J. Hill�Nova Engineering, Inc.,�Cincinnati, OHOutlineWhy These Waveforms?CPM Waveforms Offset QPSK VariationsSOQPSKDefinition of SOQPSK-A, -BFrequency Pulse Shape, g(t)Power Spectral DensitySOQPSK-A Eye PatternSOQPSK-B Eye PatternDefinition of Multi-h CPMKey CPM ParametersFrequency Pulse and Phase TreePSD ComparisonPSD is Half the StorySlide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Experimental SetupSlide Number 249 Mbps SOQPSK-A, Multichannel9 Mbps Multi-h CPM, MultichannelSlide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34SummaryConclusions