Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SOMALIA
MONTHLY MEETING
28 May 2020, Zoom
Agenda Monthly market monitoring update (Market Analysis workstream)
Workstreams update
Sub – national CWG updates- Coordinating regional cash response – Bari
floods response (Save the Children)
Mitigation of GBV risks in Cash assistance in Somalia (Somalia GBV sub-
cluster)
Multi-purpose cash assistance mapping
Somalia Safety Nets mapping (TAF)
Somalia Rural Safety Net Programme – Baxnaano (WFP)
BRCiS Shock-Responsive SN (BRCiS)
AOB
https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/somalia
/cash-activities
Cash and Markets Quarterly dashboard
Monthly Update
April 2020
Market Analysis workstream
Workstream updates
Coordinating regional cash response
Bari floods response
Save the Children
Mitigation of GBV risks in Cash
assistance in Somalia
Cash & Voucher Assistance (CVA) and GBV Risk Mitigation
28 May 2020
GBV Sub Cluster Presentation to the Cash Working Group Meeting, SOMALIA
Nkiru Igbokwe
National GBV Coordinator (UNFPA)
Lilian Osungo
Gender Focal point (WFP)
Miriam Warui
PSEA taskforce lead
Why is it important to address
mitigation of GBV risks in Cash &
Voucher Assistance? Centrality of protection in all humanitarian programming / principle of “Do
No Harm.”
Somalia is facing multiple shocks, CVA (especially mobile money) is increasing – over 38 million USD distributed in the first quarter of 2020
Beneficiaries are households, vulnerable individuals – including women and girls, with disabilities, older women… many at heightened risk of GBV.
Cash cannot contribute to self-reliance and resilience if it exacerbates risks.
How do we ensure that CVA is not creating additional risks for women and girls?
How to adapt CVA design and delivery to ensure centrality of protection?
How to work together: Cash & Protection experts?11
12
Guidance & Concrete Tools:“How do I make multipurpose cash safer in terms
of GBV? I’m not a GBV specialist!”
CVA and GBV Compendium fills a gap in
guidance for both CVA and GBV specialists –
practical advice to apply, and programme
examples to adapt/ duplicate.
1 page tools can be used by any type of
specialist, and remind practitioners what to
look out for.
13
What’s next?
- 2020: Somalia & Burundi
“Pilots”
- Clear link with PSEA
- Engage Cash actors & leverage
resources within GBV Sub-
Cluster
- Potential concrete actions
using existing tools: • Further training/capacity
building of CVA actors on GBV risk
mitigation
• GBV Risk Analysis of WFP-funded
cash assistance, with learning for
all
• Engage with GSMA (MNOs) on:
CoC, trainings, etc.
• CVA Monitoring tools?
• Other ideas?
Multi-Purpose Cash Assistance
mapping
CWG Multi –Purpose Cash Assistance Mapping Training conducted to 34 agencies on the 7th of May 2020
Update on 3Ws reports received from partners
Key issues noted in the reports
Submission of the 3Ws data to HDX for visualisation
https://data.humdata.org/visualization/somalia-cash-
programing-v3/
Feedback on the MPCA 3W process/template – what worked well,
questions/issues, recommendations, etc.?
Moving forward – All reports should be shared with Vanessa by the
7th of each month for visualisation to be ready by the 15th of the
month.
Somalia Safety Net for Human
Capital– Baxnaano (WFP)
27 May, 2020
Safety Net for Human Capital (Baxnaano)
Project Overview
Provides predictable cash transfers to poor, vulnerable and food insecure households with children under 5 years of age
Enrolls women in
selected
households as the
primary recipient
Project Design
Development Objective: The SNHCP is being developed as a National Cash Transfer
Program (NCTP) aimed at providing cash transfers to targeted poor and vulnerable
households and establish the key building blocks of a national shock- responsive safety
nets system.
Component 1:Provide Unconditional cash transfers to 200,000 households that are chronically poor and vulnerable and link them to complementary nutritional support.
Implemented by WFP for one year.
Component 2:Establish the key building blocks of a SP delivery system (policy development, capacity strengthening).
Implemented By UNICEF
Component 3: Establish and strengthen Project Implementation Unit (PIU), strengthen MoLSAs coordination, learning and knowledge managementImplemented by MoLSA
Targeting and Coverage
All states are covered
Total 21 districts
200,000 households (1.2 million people)
20
State level targeting
District level targeting
Community level targeting
Household level targeting
Multi-level Targeting
Parameters Set by Communities
District Selection
Guided by: • Poor and vulnerable
households with children
under 5 years of age
• Vulnerability assessed by
assets, debt burden, family
size and coping strategies
• Additional filters in case of
over subscription
(disability, nutrition status
etc.)
Community Selection
Guided by:
• Stress Index
• Security
• Access by Partners
• Capacity to implement
• Territorial Dynamics
Household Selection
Follows Community-
based targeting
methodology informed
by the following
considerations:
• Access to nutrition
services
• Vulnerability ranking
• Accessibility
• Meet the assigned
number of households
to be covered
Overview of the Progress:
Target: 200,000 households (1.2 million people) across 21 districts
Staggered Approach: Progressively increase coverage with provision
for retroactive payments
1st Quarter: 33,227 households enrolled and mobile transfers are
under way. To be completed in June.
2nd Quarter: Enrolment expected to surpass 50% of the programme
coverage (to be completed by 31st August including retroactive
payments)
3rd and 4th Quarters: 100% beneficiaries enrolled and all monetary
entitlements transferred (including retroactive payments
22
Baxnaano Beneficiaries receiving their
first quarter transfers.
23
Questions and clarifications
24
BRCiS Shock-Responsive SN
(BRCiS)
Shock-Responsive Safety Nets Pilot
to Build the Resilience of Ultra-
poor Somali Households28 May 2020 - Zoom
26
Agenda
1. Programmatic Approach (10 mins)
BRCiS
Safety Net Pilot
Learning and Research
2. Shock-Responsive Programming (5
mins)
Operationalization of EWEA strategy
A recent case study from Belet-Hawa
3. Q&A (5 mins)
27
BRCiS is…
9 NGOs – including 3 national NGOs
Led by NRCCreated in 2013
10 projects implemented so far – 3
ongoing
33 districts + Mogadishu
Programme Objectives & Approach
29
WHAT?1. Collaboration and Adaptive Learning
2. Crisis Modifier & Scalable Safety Nets
3. Enhancing Opportunities for Sustainable
Livelihoods
4. Governance (NRM, DRR, etc.)
5. Integrated Basic Services (WASH and H&N)
HOW?Community-led and People-Centered (PFIM, CRCs,
CAPs, etc.)
Nutrition-Sensitive
Strengthening Local Accountability
Area-Based Programming and Systems Thinking
Risk-Informed and Shock-Responsive (EW/EA, CMs,
MPCA, SN, etc.)
WHY? Vulnerable and marginalized communities
are more resilient to recurrent shocks and stresses […]
Shock-responsive safety net pilot – Rationale for Engagement
BRCiS safety net is one of the pilots within the ECHO-funded shock-responsive safety net
Regular, predictable & reliable support is key to resilience-building
Experience of Consortium Members in cash programming
Three-year funding cycle
Wide reach and scale
BRCiS Approach and Requirements for Safety Net Pilots
Definition adapted from SCI
Somalia
“composition, or ‘package’, of
interventions strategically
designed, integrated and layered
to effectively promote resilience
where the first layer must consist of
unconditional cash transfers that
are regular, predictable and
reliable over time”
BRCiS Approach and Requirements for Safety Net Pilots
Prerequisites
Unconditional and
unrestricted
At least 24 months
Delivered monthly at a fixed time
USD 20 a month up to USD 40 as an early-action
scale-up
Community-based
beneficiary selection with the,
validated by LAs
Plus
Graduation approach,
layered with other
interventions to
maximize nutrition impacts
No overlap with MPCA HHs at the community
level
Key Programmatic Characteristics
2,146 households (reduced to 2,066 due to security incident in Afmadow)
16 districts
Diverse livelihoods groups:
pastoralists (43%), urban poor (26%), agro-pastoralists (21%), riverine communities (6%) and
urban IDPs (5%) in Kahda
1, 054 drought- affected households with top-up (40 USD)
MEAL Framework with a focus on H&N of children under 5
Resilience Survey with 1000+ HHs at baseline, midline
and endline(TANGO and FAO methodology)
Qualitative interviews to
collect beneficiary feedback
Regular PDMs for impact and
accountability
Bi-Monthly H&N Surveillance
System rolled out in June 2020 (mother-led
MUAC due to C-19)
Pause & Reflect Learning Sessions with BRCiS field staff about the
effectiveness of programme
delivery
EWEA Strategy for Shock-Responsive
Programming
Strategic outcome / Pillar 2:
Early actions taken ahead of impending
shocks and early response to sudden
shocks enables individuals, households
and communities in BRCiS target areas
to mitigate shock impacts and prevent humanitarian crisis.
4.Learning and adaptation
3.Early action capacities
/Crisis Modification
2.Area-level early warning
1.Community-centred EWEA
Area-level early warning
Area-level EWS provide predictive and reliable information for communities,
local stakeholders, BRCiS members and other stakeholders to trigger
commensurate early action measures.
• Community-based: 30+ EWEA indicators collected by CRCs and project staff
• Timely – collected monthly
• Triangulated - granular EW information triangulated with higher-level district secondary data –FSNAU, SWALIM, etc.
EWEA Reporting
Tool
Area-level early warning: example of
triangulation
CRS Members reported
below-average rainfall
for 1-31 October in
Hobyo
BRCIS is using satellite
data to triangulate
information received
from the field
Adaptive shock-responsive programming 2018-2020
Nov
2018
Below-
average
Deyr
Drought early
actions
Mid-May
Delay in
the
onset of
Gu rains
CM
activate
d
IRF Flood response
reallocation
Early
Oct
Above-
average
forecast
and
flood
EW
CM impl.
(including MPCA
and SN top-ups)
Flood
early
actions
IRF Drought scale-up
IRF Locust
reallocation
SN top-ups
in Belet-
Hawa
Skyrocketin
g sorghum
prices in
Belet-Hawa
COVID-19
impacts
CAP
reallocatio
n for C-19
3 million
GBD RRF in
urban
hotpot areas
Case Study: Safety Net Top-Ups in Belet-
Hawa (March 2020)
Price of sorghum grew three-fold
Affected communities were red-flagged
Validation of data by field staff
Decision to activate top-ups at managerial level
Consultation with LAs
40 USD cash transfers from March onwardsBardera Belet-HawaBorama Elbarde Erigavo Galdogob Wajid Wanlaweyn
Thresholds
For Alarm
(BRCiS EW)
34000 35000 18000 21000 21000 40000 15000 26000
End of Presentation.
Thank you!
Social Safety Nets, Safety nets
and shock response component
Mapping
(TAF)
AOB