Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Societies of Tomorrow
Giorgos Verdi Schwarzkopf Stiftung Junges Europa
Introduction
The digital revolution is upon us. From the proliferation of the personal computer to
the emergence of artificial intelligence, the 21st century has witnessed the unfolding
of game-changing innovation. Right now, the impact of these technologies on our
lives is blurred. It is still hard to tell in what way exactly they are changing our
societies.
The only thing that is certain is that change will be for a fact. If we look back at our
societies’ history, we can understand more clearly that our lives are destined to be
disrupted by technological advances.
The first occasion in which technology disrupted society in a large scale was during
the agricultural revolution. It disrupted the way in which humans covered their most
basic needs and therefore it gave birth to a new status quo: Humans now formed
2
settlements, organized political structures, created writing, specialized their labor,
began trading and gave birth to what we now call civilization.
We can observe a similar pattern during the industrial revolution. The inclusion of
steam and electricity in the productive process changed history in way which today
seems obvious. Industrial societies gave birth to the middle class which in turn gave
birth to modern democracy. Moreover, the need for raw materials gave birth to
colonialism and the supply of cheap steel enabled the possibility of total war.
If the pattern I have presented by now seems persuasive, then the next logical step
is to question: Where will the digital revolution take us? What is the new status quo
that will emerge? What will be the upsides and the downsides of living in digital
societies? These were the questions that guided my research.
The Case Study of Estonia
Catching a view of Tallinn from the Toompea Hill is a beautiful experience. The
history of the whole city unfolds itself from there through its magnificent architecture.
The first thing you can notice is the Old Town, a product of the medieval period in
3
which the city of Tallinn was developed. Next, you will most likely spot the old
factories and buildings in Telliskivi which represent the communist era in which the
city came under Soviet control. Lastly, somewhere between these two areas you can
observe the glass-walled skyscrapers of the City Center, some of which are
decorated with enormous digital screens. The era which this last area represents is
the reason I came to Tallinn, Estonia.
Estonia has been named by The Wire Magazine as the world’s most advanced
digital society. When I was mentioning this fact to my friends and family, most of
them looked stunned. How can a country with a population of 1.3 million people
which gained its independence just 27 years ago be the world’s most advanced
digital society?
It all started with governance. Today, 99% of Estonia’s public services are available
digitally, as eServices. This includes taxing as well. Filling your taxes in Estonia
takes about 5 minutes and every year around 95% of the population does it through
their computers. Since 2005, voting is done digitally too. The only thing that is
required for you to vote from home is a Digital ID.
As you can imagine, in an information state like this, cyber-security is a prime
concern. In order to resolve this issue, Estonia has deployed blockchain
technologies in its national registries and it has also built a data embassy in
Luxembourg which acts as a state backup in case of a large-scale cyber-attack.
Estonia has also been named The Silicon Valley of Europe. This title derives from
the fact that Estonia produces the most startups per capita than any other European
country. Four Estonian startups are today evaluated at over $1 billion. It’s most
probable that you have already used Estonia’s most famous product, Skype.
In case you got jealous of this environment and you wish you could start your own
business there, you should know that you can. Estonia’s eResidency program allows
foreigners to establish their business in the country and take advantage of the
eServices. Of course, every step of the process is done digitally. You won’t even
have to leave your house.
Estonia’s achievements made it the perfect place to research all the questions I
mentioned earlier. I decided therefore to travel to Tallinn for three weeks in order to
learn what’s it like to live in a society of information. My research was to be
conducted through interviews. At the heart of the meetings that I arranged and the
questions that I posed was the issue of sustainability. I focused on the question of
4
how our choices regarding technology can impact future societies positively rather
than negatively.
On Education
One of the questions that Societies of Information need to address is education. Our
educational systems were tailored to fit the needs and opportunities of the Industrial
Revolution. Today, as information has become available to everybody through the
internet and as the information economy emerges, we need to re-adapt our
educational systems to the new environment.
In order to understand this trend better, I visited the Mektory Innovation and
Business Center of the Tallinn University of Technology. There, I met with Meeli
Semjonov, who explained to me what the Mektory is and why it is so important for
Estonia.
5
MEKTORY Innovation and Business Center Meeli Semjonov, Coordinator
“The Tallinn University of Technology started in 1918 as an engineer school. Today it
is an international university with 12.000 students enrolled in its programs. Thirteen
of these programs are tailor made for foreign students.
Mektory was built in 1986 but it was born in 2013, when the Department of
Information Technology moved out.
When a company has a problem and they are interested in working with students in
order to solve it, they contact Mektory which in turns connects them to a student
team, led by a professor.
They are even interested in first year students. That’s why we have established a
rule under which students cannot be employed by a company after a project is
completed. Too many students were dropping off their studies to be employed with
these companies
An example is a project underdone by Mitsubishi. The company imported 400
electric cars in Estonia, but the problem was that there weren’t enough electric
charges laying around for these cars. Mitsubishi contacted Mektory which gave the
project to a student team to solve. Every week, we organize two to four projects.
A lot of students want to start their own companies, so we created an incubation
project. The program is targeted at TTU students and even at small children. We
educate them on innovation, corporate affairs and we even help them find
customers. The incubation project lasts for four months. If a company is successful,
it can go two ways: Either they sell out to a major company or they rent a room in the
Mektory for six months. The Mektory doesn’t provide any funding. It just supports
students with their vision.
Another one of our aims is to popularize science among children. We organize
technology related workshops. These may include robotics or plain simply some
science games. Programming is integrated in the national curriculum, so children
come to the workshops to learn about more advanced stuff. Our aim is to attract the
future generation of university students.”
After our talk about the Mektory, I asked Meeli to talk to me a little bit about Cyber
Security education, which I have heard is a priority in Estonia.
6
“In 2007, Estonia was the target of the first ever cyber-attack in history. After that, the
Cyber Security Engineering BA program was created. There are lots of smart people
in this program. We even have Cyber Olympics, where students engage in Ethical
Hacking.”
MEKTORY Innovation and Business Center
After our discussion, Meeli showed me around at the Mektory building.
Mektory is mainly funded by the government, but it also partners with private sector
enterprises, like Samsung. These partnerships usually last from five to ten years.
Currently, there are a lot of companies interested in a partnership. The Mektory
building hosts 40 rooms in its three floors. One third of these room belong to
companies. They are renting the rooms, so they can promote themselves to students
and attract the most talented ones.
The first room she showed me was the one we had our discussion in. The Samsung
Digital Academy, where tablets are put in place in front of each chair. This is a
showcase, Meeli told me, of how tablets can replace pen and paper in the traditional
school system.
After that, she showed me the Erickson Room which is completely controlled by
electronics. With the push of a button you could even make the walls transparent.
There was a room with Lego robotics. A room about ventilation technology. An
energy studio with an electric map which was used to familiarize students with
electrical panels. There was even a sauna meeting room where contact signing took
place.
Meeli also showed me the national rooms. There was the American Embassy room,
the Japanese room, the Chinese room, the German room etc. Each room was
designed with the purpose to represent each nation’s values. For example, the
German room was meant to represent practicality.
7
At the end of our tour, Meeli showed me the Delegations Map. It was a world map
with signings and wishes from every national delegation that had visited Mektory.
You could see that people from nearly every corner of the Earth had come to the
Mektory to witness the wonders of modern education. I wrote a warm wish on the
map and wished Meeli a nice evening.
On Social Inequality
Gender equality will be a major challenge for information societies. In the UK, it is
estimated that women make up only 14% of the work force employed in STEM
(Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). As information societies emerge,
it is only reasonable that the importance of these fields will increase. Employment in
the tech industry offers high salaries and the chance to largely impact the world. It is
therefore urgent for women to be engaged in these subjects if we want future
societies to be equal.
To understand how we can get women interested in technology, I met with Ines
Boski, founder of the Women in Technology students’ club.
8
Women in Technology Ines Bôski, Founder
“I am not Estonian. I am half-Portuguese, half-Polish, born and raised in Belgium. I
came to Estonia to study on a master’s program. I studied eGovernance at the
Tallinn University of Technology. The reputation of the country in eGovernance is
what brought me to Estonia. I was interested in applications of ICT in Development. I
did my undergraduate in the UK, where I studied Geography. After I graduated, I
learned to program and started my own business.
I founded Women in Technology when I arrived in Tallinn University of Technology.
When I was learning how to program, and I was seeing all these men program, I
started feeling lonely. I started to think, what is it that holds women back in technical
fields? I created Women in Technology to educate them about the importance of
tech, not just from a professional perspective but also as an everyday tool that can
have an impact on your life, your country and the world. There is a whole world you
could be missing just because you didn’t focus on it enough during school.
We have workshops, events, guest speakers and even debates. The purpose is to
educate, raise awareness and create a community.
We organized a series called Front End Web Development Series, which we created
in partnership with Mektory. Our purpose is to give women hands-on experience with
tech. It ran successfully. Front end web development gets a lot of attention because
it gives you instant gratification. You create a website and you instantly see the
results of it. It is very satisfying, and people were very engaged. The camp ran for
three months.
We were meeting once a week. We would code all together, introduce the topic and
then during the week, people would learn virtually through a website. In anything you
learn you want to feel supported. The problem for women is that tech is a man’s
world. When you’re learning something as challenging as programming you want to
have role models. You want to relate to people learning.
There has been a steady decrease of women studying engineering and technology
fields since 1980. Personal computers are a major factor for this. They were mostly
directed towards men. The personal computer was usually placed in a boys’ and not
a girls’ room. Nowadays, women are the biggest early adopters of tech, but they are
not involved as much as men in learning how these devices work. Women were
9
never part of the conversation. They were always end consumers. But what if they
wanted to create?
People need to stop and think, why is it that I can’t be a quality engineer. They need
to think that «hey, maybe I could do this». We need to help people engage in
learning material that can change their lives.
There are many hackathons. This is a great way to get women interested in tech. It
provides hand-on experience. It is important to practice when you’re learning to
program. We push a lot of members to participate. When they’re done they are
thinking: Hey I didn’t realize that this could be easy and interesting.
Programming bootcamps are on the rise. Most of the organization have special
programs for women. In Estonia there is a lot of special treatment targeted towards
women such as scholarships and grants. These bootcamps are expensive and it’s
nice to see that help is offered in order to remove this economic obstacle.
Many women in tech face structural barriers. That means that even though they go
through they are trained as engineers, they are still held back from finding a job.
There are many factors into this. Employers think that a woman will bring problems
because of maternity leaves and family time. I believe that these companies should
address men in the same way. Men should also be able to take paternity leaves and
be allowed to have quality family time.
10
When a woman is interviewing for a position, she shouldn’t be asked irrelevant
questions such as, if she’s planning to have a family. We can balance this problem
out. Men should also be able to take days off in order to take care of their children.
Women, on the other hand, should be able to work from home during their leaves.
There are a lot of problems with sexism in the workplace. You can hear something
that is meant to be funny but is ultimately demeaning. These unsupportive
environments are a reason that women are not entering the tech industry.
Women in Tech is not only focused on women. The more men are involved in these
discussions the better they can understand that the things they say can have an
impact, whether that is a joke or a comment. We just want to let men know that
women would love to have your professional support.
My parents weren’t very tech oriented. They wanted to give a technical education to
my brother. Whenever there was a mechanical task, my brother would be called for
help. There is no need to blame anyone. That’s just society.
I do believe that diversity can bring about success in a business. That’s just data. We
want to highlight this fact in order to achieve diversity. The fact that you have some
interesting results in your company if you don’t just have an all-white men team.
Diverse work spaces should not be limited to gender but should also be open to
racial diversity. It is wonderful if a company can create an environment like that. In
the United States, you have organizations that exclusively target groups like African
American Women. For example. Black Girls Who Code is an important example.”
At this time of the interview I wanted to ask Ines about The Google Memo. The
Google Memo, also known as Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber, was an internal
memo that was issued by James Damore, one of the company’s engineers. The
Memo became a subject of interest on mass media because it advocated that the
reason women are not involved in the tech industry is mainly genetic.
“The Google Memo was a controversial moment. Personally, I think it is sad. You
can have studies for a lot of things, and I am sure there are studies that try to prove
that women are less capable to learn certain things. There is no vastly verifiable
proof that this is the case. Again, I think that is sad that people push their personal
frustrations to the point of trying to back their argument with genetics.
11
Change brings a lot of controversy. Companies like Google understand the power of
diversity. Since diversity brings better business results, why wouldn’t you want to
gain a competitive advantage?
My advice for little girls is this: Get exposed. When you are a little kid you are most
likely to do what your parents tell you to do. So, what I would say to the parents of a
little girl is, expose her to as many things as possible. Maybe she won’t understand it
fully, but a little kid will always find ways to assemble or disassemble. Give the
opportunity and see what happens. I wish I was given the opportunity to play around
technical things like circuits.”
On The Environment
Climate change is one of humanity’s greatest challenges for the 21st century. For us
to preserve the well-being of future generations, it is imperative that we put an end to
the process of destroying our own planet.
A lot of proposals have been made on how to tackle climate change, but most of
them can be boiled down to two categories: The prophet and the magician. A
12
prophet is someone who warns us about our current way of living and proposes that
we cut down on some of our excesses. A magician on the other hand is someone
who believes in the power of technology and the effectiveness it can have in
changing our way of living and our impact on the environment.
For my third interview, I met with Erki Ani, in order to understand how technology can
be utilized in our fight with climate change, and how societies like Estonia are able to
inspire and influence Magicians.
Cleantech ForEst Erki Ani, CEO
“I studied Environmental Technology and Management. In 2015, I went to the
Netherlands to live for three years. There, I started engaging with Cleantech. I
studied entrepreneurship and participated in various hackathons. When I came back,
I enrolled at the Tallinn University of Technology. I founded a student organization
called GreenTech Club. After that, I was proposed to be CEO of Cleantech ForEst.
Cleantech is an innovative way of bringing together technology, solutions and
services that promotes sustainable development, resource efficiency and contributes
to the circular economy and development. Basically, it is about innovative startups
that deal with energy materials.
The purpose of Cleantech ForEst is to engage as much as possible with various
organizations, institutions and ministries, in order to help achieve innovative
sustainable development. We have educational programs aimed at graduate
students and at whole organizations. Cleantech ForEst has five employees.
We also organize hackathons where we bring together various agencies such as
governmental organizations, industry representatives and open-minded students.
Through them, we are trying to create startups. We later develop these startups
through our other programs such as Climate Launchpad, the world’s biggest green
ideas business competition, and the Climate-KIC Accelerator.
We are now developing a scientific magazine called The Footprint, which will be
published in October 2019.
We are also developing one more project, which will be launched in January 2019. It
is called Smart Sustainable Districts. It deals with converting a plain city district into a
smart, sustainable city district. We are talking about refurbishing the apartment
13
buildings, installing solar panels, providing electric mobility cars and even bikes.
Everything is supposed to be smart. Whether that is street lights or ventilation.
This March we went to Uzbekistan. We organized a high-level conference and now
we are initiating a project there which deals with innovation and clean technology
through the export of startups.
All in all, we have developed a whole pipeline for developing innovative solutions. It
starts with the students. We bring young scientist to hackathons and then we give
them the possibility, through Climate Launchpad, to develop their ideas into startups.
Later, through the Climate-KIC Accelerator we can ensure them funding up to
€90.000. Lastly, we export them to developing countries, like Uzbekistan, because
that’s where the biggest needs for clean technological solutions are.
The number of cleantech startups is increasing, and we’re also noticing an increase
in the level of their competence. The cleantech sector launched just four years ago,
in 2014. The first initiatives were organized from Startup Estonia. That’s were
Cleantech ForEst also grew out from.
Each year about ten or twelve new cleantech startup ideas are being developed.
Their life span is not that good. Less than half of them continue to exist after their
first year.
Since the Paris Agreement, the Ministry of Environment has become serious about
the topics of eco-innovation and circular economy. We have a great collaboration
with the Ministry. The seriousness of the topic has also grown a lot. We are seeing
more conferences on topics like eco-innovation and sustainable management.
The main bulk of investments that go into startups is in digitalization and in particular,
Information and Computer Technologies. My aim for this year is to bring about more
startups that are dealing with ICT solutions in Cleantech.
I understood however that it is not that easy. If you are talking about Cleantech you
are talking about technology that you can see and touch and produce prototypes, not
technologies that have a front-end and a back-end. Nevertheless, Cleantech startups
that use ICT products tend to be more successful.
Climate Launchpad started in 2014. It started in the Netherlands, in the living room of
just two people. The competition takes place in 51 different locations.
14
There are some noteworthy Startups that went through the competition process. The
first one is called Dessert Control and is from Norway. They patented a nanotech
solution which attracts water, with the purpose of turning infertile land into fertile.
The second one is called Reverse Recourses and is from Estonia. They crated a
data base regarding textile left overs, so they can be reused by designers. They won
the H&M Global Change Award.
The European Finals of Climate Launchpad for 2016 were held in Tallinn. It’s like a
Eurovision Contest. There were 120 startups competing from all over Europe. We
had this startup called Gela-text. They are utilizing animal industry left overs in order
to create leather. It’s basically gelatin-based leather.
For this year’s Climate Launchpad there are already 1400 applications. Only a
handful of them will be selected. This years’ Climate Launchpad is the biggest so far
with 45 countries participating, including non-European ones such as Australia,
Kenya and India.
We send our startups to international pitching events because in Estonia,
investments in Cleantech are small. Investing in Cleantech is risky. It is no that
cheap. It’s more expensive than investing in ICT and the return of investment is
slower because of the scalability.
Europe is looking much better. The Finnish, for example, are doing great. They have
a Cleantech Venture Day in Helsinki where we try to send our startups. We’ve sent
six of our startups there for this year. Three of them came back with investments.
The topic which is most necessary in Cleantech is water. Water scarcity is a problem
for developing countries. That’s why we look for startups that deal with this problem.
Food production and agriculture are also important.
The topics that engage me the most are the ones that impact the most people. It
doesn’t matter if it’s in energy, water or waste management.
Each year we see a lot of innovative ideas. We know that 80% of them are not going
to continue the next year. We know however that, the more startups we engage with
each year, the more impact we are going to have. It is important that people think
about these issues and spread the world. The number of people engaged in
sustainable development is growing.
We need a systemic approach. For example, we don’t believe that you should cut
transportation off because it produces too much carbon dioxide. We need a systemic
15
approach, which means new services, new products, new infrastructure and new
routines. Every single one of these are business opportunities. That’s why
sustainable development is not a step back. It is ten steps forward.”
On Governance
The Zeitgeist indicates that governments are useless. They’re bureaucratic, political
and at the end of the day the only thing they’re good at is wasting our taxes.
However, it is important to recognize that governments can be entrepreneurial too.
For example, the computer and the internet, the driving forces of the digital
revolution, were developed indeed by governments.
Estonians recognize that governments can play an important role in facilitating and
boosting innovation. It was their country’s government that kickstarted their
digitalization initiative and gave birth to one of the world’s leading info states.
What’s more they recognize that technology is currently redefining governance
around the world and is posing new challenged, whether that is democracy, cyber-
security or data privacy.
16
I wanted to better understand how governments shape and are being shaped by
technological advances, so I met with Annela Kiirats, programme director of
Estonia’s eGovernance Academy.
eGovernance Academy Annela Kiirats, Programme Director
“I’m working for the eGovernance Academy for 14 years. My main task is to organize
study tours for international delegates, mainly government officials. Our target is to
mainly host officials from developing countries.
The purpose of the eGovernance Academy is to share the Estonian eGovernance
experience internationally.
At the moment, 26 people are working at eGA. If we also include external partners,
then we are talking about 100 people. We need knowledge from different sectors,
different levels and different point of views.
What differs us from the other countries that are ranked highly in eGovernance, is
that we have an architecture is place. Some countries are better than us but only in
specific fields. Estonia has the whole picture, that is the full architecture for
exchanging information.
Nobody knows what happens in twenty years. I would not go that far. If I had to
mention a future trend it would be seamless government. That means that end users
don’t have to give any additional input. In other worlds, for me to get services from
the government, I am providing my basic information once and they never ask about
it again.
An example would be Tax Authority. Now, we are still obligated to log in to an
environment even though every information is pre-filled. There is still something
extra that the user must do. Seamless government, on the other hand, would be
paying taxes without having to log into the environment.
I wouldn’t want to say that in ten years we will be like robots. Hopefully however,
services will be easier to handle than today.
Driverless cars are not just a wish. Estonia has already practiced a driverless bus.
These models exist but they’re not yet applied to everyday life. Driverless cars
demand an infrastructure and therefore we still have a long way to go for them to be
put in place.
17
When foreign delegations arrive, we’re not only talking about Estonia. We’re trying to
be more international and bring more perspectives to the table in order to help the
countries that come to us.
We hear concerns all the time. The first thing we hear concerns about is transparent
information. Transparent information is when the citizen is able to see his log file, to
see who has been viewing his data and knows that there is a strong legal framework
that demands justification in order for officials to access his data.
Foreign delegations are usually concerned when they hear about things like
eSchool, where students’ grades are made transparent for parents, or eHealth, in
which the patient owns the data and can even prevent a doctor from accessing them.
A big problem is that foreign countries face is central coordination. I usually ask
delegations who is responsible for the development of eGovernance and every
Ministry replies that they are in charge.
There is no point to do something that has already be done. Therefore, horizontal
coordination is important. Having a strategy which is also sustainable is another
important condition for developing eGovernance.
Governments come here, and they tell us that the technology is in place but they
haven’t put in place the coordination or the legal frameworks. These are necessary
conditions.
The benefits of eGovernance start right at the basis of society. The first example is
the identification of population. Giving documents and releasing the number of
people that are in need is a process facilitated by eGovernance.
Administration and the exchange of information is also improved by eGovernance.
These procedures become transparent, convenient and trusted, from a citizen’s
perspective. Citizens can know what data the government has about them.
Governments don’t need to be digitized in order for them to hold your data.
Digitalization provides transparency and creates communication channels between
the state and its citizens. Data manipulation can happen on paper and it happens
more easily. It is crucial that we have data protection principles and monitoring in
place.
Some countries don’t want their citizens to be numbered. This happens either
because of religious or historical reasons. But for you to get something out of your
18
government you have to meet them half-way. You must agree with the government
on something if you want functional services.
You have to consider the digital gap as well. In Estonia, not all government offices
are closed. I can go and talk physically to an official but at the same time I can do
anything online. Services have to be provided to everybody.
At eGovernance Academy we have a separate eDemocracy Unit. President Obama
brought light to this initiative. It can give citizens the opportunity to talk and
participate in different processes. In Estonia, people are involved on decision making
at a city level and can also participate in law making drafts. The purpose of
eDemocracy is to provide a civilized way for citizens to voice their concerns.
The eGovernment project is all about public private partnerships. The government
promotes the innovation done by startups. Many of the startups, while they begin in
Estonia, they end up elsewhere. It would be great if companies came back or
opened a branch here. The problem is that if the market is better elsewhere, startups
with good ideas will try to expand.
Foreigners without citizenship can apply for eResidency in order to enjoy the benefits
of Digitalization. These digital channels prevent people from having to go through the
hassle and cost of flying constantly in order to conduct business.
Right now, we are pushing for the Once Only principle. This is fundamental in the
communication between governments and citizens. If I have given my data once to
any government institutions, then it is up to them to exchange it. I just need to know
that my data are safe and are not being misused. Governments often let their
citizens enter their data time and time again. This is not wise.”
On The Economy
Estonia is the country with the most startups per capita in Europe. Four of these
startups have been evaluated at over $1 billion. For these reasons, Estonia has been
named The Silicon Valley of Europe.
Entrepreneurship is a critical factor of technological advancement. Startups are
continuously disrupting the current economic reality and as a result new markets are
constantly emerging.
19
I wanted to learn more about Estonia’s achievements in the startup scene and about
the future of entrepreneurship, so I talked to Sander Sillavee, social media specialist
at Startup Estonia.
Startup Estonia Sander Sillavee, Social Media Specialist
“I’ve been active in the Estonian ecosystem for about a year. Before Startup Estonia,
I was working in marketing and I completed an internship in the United States, in San
Francisco. I came back and I’m happy that I’m here. I love Estonia!
My first year has been pretty crazy. It’s really cool and I’m really happy to be a part of
this community, helping startups and helping the ecosystem to grow.
Startup Estonia is a government entity with the aim to help boost the startup
ecosystem in Estonia. We bridge the gaps where the market doesn’t help itself. We
tend to be agile and work in collaboration with the community.
Last week, for example, we held an ecosystem summit with 80 people coming from
the startup scene. We had workshops and discussed various topics in order to figure
out where want to go next as a community.
20
To help startups, we help supporting organizations. Startup Estonia is comprised of 7
people and it would be too much for us to provide help to every single Estonian
startup. Therefore, we help supporting organization.
We have some focuses. One of them is regulations. We have good connections with
the government and we try to create friendly regulations for startups.
We crated the Startup Visa initiative to helps bring foreign founders to Estonia. It
went from idea to execution in only 11 months. That’s one thing that we do. The
other part is working on social media and events. In a nutshell we focus on the
community.
An example is this conference that we have, called Refresh. It is about front-end
developers and designers. It’s a specialized conference but its content is really good,
and many foreign speakers are participating.
We also have Tech Startup Week Tallinn. It’s going to be an exciting week of
startups events. We want to educate people who have some vague knowledge about
startups but are not sure about what they’re doing.
Moreover, we are creating a track for children and youth called Future Founders.
The aim is to let children know about entrepreneurship and the opportunities which
exist out there.
In our community, we have around 550 startups. In our website you can find a full
database of them. We are observing a steady increase in their number. Last year,
when I started out, we had around 400. The whole sector grew around 30% in a
year.
We don’t promote ourselves as The Silicon Valley of Europe. It’s not that it’s a bad
thing. We’re just focusing more on building the best ecosystem possible without it
having to be that big. Per capita we’re doing pretty great and we’re also have a large
number of successful companies which is also pretty good.
When Skype launched in 2003, the founders brought some money from the
investments back in Estonia and that’s how the community got started. The
community is young, and it would never be a reality without the early founders who
kick starting it.
There is no direct funding for startups. We believe more in the venture capital money
than just giving hand-outs. The money finds its place through the market. We’re not
such a rich country and we have to be agile.
21
We’re happy to see successful startups but we have to make one thing clear:
Estonia is so small that it cannot be a market. Estonia is just a starting phase. If you
want to scale you need to expand. However, you can leave your development team
in Estonia. That’s what TransferWise has done, for example.
Taxify is a whole another story. They’re keeping everything in Estonia. It started with
this student Marcus who wanted to go to a party but none of the taxies where
available. That’s where he got the idea. At first, he wanted to create an app for taxi
companies but that didn’t work out. When they shifted their focus to the consumer
side it became successful. Now they’re evaluated at $1 billion.
Let Estonian startups leave. We’re happy to see them grow and go to the markets
where they think they will succeed. The trend we see is that successful companies
always keep something in Estonia. They also tend to come back with more
knowledge.
It’s really excited to see foreign founders come to Estonia just to start a business. To
this day, we’ve had around 720 applicants from companies that want to come to
Estonia through Startup Visa.
First step is, if you want to come and start your business you are going to be
evaluated by the startup committee. These are not suit and tie people from the
government. They are people from our community.
We’re actively promoting our visa program. We’re going to cities all over the world
and we’re talking about it. The eResidency program also helps a lot.
If you want to physically come to Estonia, you need the Startup Visa. The
eResidency on the other hand is an easier way to conduct business. It’s not a permit.
As a small community, we haven’t focused on specific teams or trends. We want to
initiate the whole ecosystem. We have some initiatives however. For example, some
people from Startup Estonia worked on green technologies. Now, we also have a
person responsible for the cybersecurity ecosystem. However, in general, we don’t
see many trends standing out.
If you are a foreign founder and want to start a company in the easiest place
possible and you need a place in Europe to start, Estonia is the best place to do it.
Starting a business is easy, dealing with the government is easy. You can do
anything online and government stays in the background.
22
If you are a young and ambitious entrepreneur, just be curious. You don’t have to
think about startups. Explore and try things out. There’s nothing wrong with
expanding your horizons.”
Instead of a Conclusion
Let us fight for every woman and every man to have the opportunity to live healthy,
secure lives, full of opportunity and love.
We are all time-travelers, journeying together into the future.
But let us work together to make that future a place we want to visit.
Be brave, be determined, overcome the odds.
It can be done.
- Stephen Hawking