Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE)index-Youth DRAFT · DRAFT. UNITED NA TIONS MOLDOV A DEMOGRAPHICS Sample size: 1233, including 356 in UTA Gagauzia Age: 14-18 14 20% 15 17%

Social Cohesion and Reconci l iat ion (SCORE)index-Youth

DRAFT

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

DEMOGRAPHICSSample size: 1233, including 356 in UTA Gagauzia

Age: 14-18

1420%

1517%

1625%

1720%

1818%

Age distribution

Urban35%

Rural65%

Urbanity distribution

Boys47%

Girls53%

Gender distribution


Openness towards

outgroups

2.9

Constructive citizenship

6.3

Sharing a human rights

ethos

6.5

Support for gender equity and inclusion

5.5

Brain drain and emigration tendency

6.5*

O V E R A L L S O C I A L C O H E S I O N A M O N G Y O U T H

Social

Cohesion

4.9

* This score was reversed to calculate the overall score for social cohesion


Openness towards

outgroups

2.9


6.3


ethos

6.5


5.5


6.5

CONSTRUCTIVE C IT IZENSHIP

=ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP +

MOTIVATION TO PARTICIPATE

Social

Cohesion

4.9


CONSTRUCTIVE C IT IZENSHIP

Adults: 5.8

6.3Components of Constructive Citizenship – Heatmaps

Active citizenship Motivation to participate

in decision-making


CONSTRUCTIVE C IT IZENSHIP Motivation to Participate in Decision-Making – Partial Predictive Model

Motivation to participate in

decision-making

Collaborative problem-solving

skills

Creativity traits

Feeling included in decision-making

Teacher support

SDS Risk

Abuse environment

Positive family environment


CONSTRUCTIVE C IT IZENSHIP Motivation to Participate in Decision-Making – Detailed View

63.40%

25.60% 24.80%19.90% 17.90%

71.20%

25.90%31.60%

20.30% 16.90%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Your family Your school Volunteer groups and civicorganizations

Public authorities Political parties

I am strongly interested to participate in making decisions made by…

Boys Girls

Indicator Rural Urban Difference

Feeling included in decision-making 5.2 4.5 0.6

Motivation to participate in decision-making 5.7 5.1 0.5

Indicator Boys Girls Difference

Feeling included in decision-making 4.97 4.91 0.06

Motivation to participate in decision-making 5.33 5.58 0.25


Openness towards

outgroups

2.9


6.3


ethos

6.5


5.5


6.5


Social

Cohesion

4.9


BRAIN DRAIN AND EMIGRATION TENDENCYEmigration Tendency – Detailed View

36.5%

47.1%

75.6% 76.0%78.5%

63.5%

53.0%

24.4% 24.1%21.6%

Moldova is a goodplace to live and

work

I can make a realdifference if I stay inthis country for the

long term

At some point in thefuture, I hope toleave Moldova

My friends or familyoften talk about

making a better lifesomewhere else

Many members ofmy family or friends

emigratedsomewhere else tomake a better life.

Emigration Tendency

Strongly/Somewhat agree Strongly/Somewhat Disagree

Adults: 6.4

Emigration tendency


BRAIN DRAIN AND EMIGRATION TENDENCYEmigration Tendency – Partial Predictive Model

Emigration tendency

Ambition

Civic motivation

Satisfaction and trust in the

education system

Access to services and infrastructure

Perceived corruption

Personal and political security

School connectedness

Abusive environment

Positive family environment

Progressive values

Urbanity

Cluster: Gagauzia

Governance

Relationships

Values

Location

Correlates Drivers Outcome



Openness towards

outgroups

2.9


6.3


ethos

6.5


5.5


6.5

Social

Cohesion

4.9

=SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS +

BELIEF IN UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS + SOCIAL TOLERANCE


SHARING A HUMAN RIGHTS ETHOS

Adults: 7.1 Adults: 6.7 Adults: 3.3

Components of Sharing a Human Rights Ethos – Heatmaps

Belief in universality of

human rights

Support for general

human rights

Social tolerance


SHARING A HUMAN RIGHTS ETHOS

64.4%

44.0%

39.6% 38.8%

24.2%24.7%

21.4%

9.7%

22.7%

30.3%

41.4%

29.4%35.8%

23.3%

32.6%

15.2%12.9%

25.6%

19.1%

31.8%

40.0%

52.0%

46.0%

75.1%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

People with adifferent colour of

skin

Jews People with physicalor mental disorder

Muslims Roma LGBTQI+ People living withHIV or AIDS

Drug addicts

I would accept to interact with them personallyI would accept them in the community, but personally avoid communicationI would not want to have them in my community at all

35.6% 55.9% 60.5% 61.2% 75.8% 75.3% 78.6% 90.3%

Adults 73%

Adults 23%

Adults 53%

Adults 66%

Adults 94%

Adults 85%

Adults 96%

Adults 66%

Social Tolerance

Social Tolerance – Detailed View



Openness towards

outgroups

2.9


6.3


ethos

6.5


5.5


6.5

Social

Cohesion

4.9

=SUPPORT FOR WOMEN IN POLITICAL POSITIONS +

BELIEF IN FEMALE INFERIORITY + NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS WOMEN IN THE WORKFORCE


S U P P O R T F O R G E N D E R E Q U I T Y A N D I N C L U S I O N

Adults: 5.2 Adults: 5.7

Components of Support for Gender Equity and Inclusion – Heatmaps

Belief in female inferiority Support for women in

politics

Negative attitudes

towards women’s

participation in the

workforce


Support for gender equity and inclusion & sharing a human rights ethos – Partial Model

Support for women in political

positions

Support for sexual, identity and

reproductive rights

Tolerance of diversity

Conservatism

Prosocial orientation

Satisfaction with the education system

Parental involvement

Empathy

General human rights

Progressive human rights

Correlates Drivers Outcome

Belief in female inferiority

Support for general human

rights

SUPPORT FOR HUMAN R IGHTS


Openness towards

outgroups

2.9


6.3


ethos

6.5


5.5


6.5

OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

=TRUST TOWARDS OUTGROUPS +

NEGATIVE FEELINGS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

Social

Cohesion

4.9


OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

Negative feelings towards people who

support union with Romania

Adults 3.8

Adults 4.0

Adults: 4.1

Adults 3.7

Negative feelings towards outgroups – Detailed View


support union with Romania


support closer ties with the EU

Negative feelings towards

people living in Gagauzia

Negative feelings towards people living in

Transnistria


support closer ties with Russia


OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS Trust towards outgroups – Detailed View

Trust in people who support union with

Romania

Trust in people who support union with

Romania

Trust in people who support closer ties

with the EU

Trust in people living in

Gagauzia

Trust in people living in TransnistriaTrust in people who support closer ties with

Russia

THANK

YOU!

Documents

Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE)index-Youth DRAFT · DRAFT. UNITED NA TIONS MOLDOV A DEMOGRAPHICS Sample size: 1233, including 356 in UTA Gagauzia Age: 14-18 14 20% 15 17%