View
1.485
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Conferencia de Manuel Romero, IMDEA Energía, en el marco de la jornada sobre Pequeños sistemas modulares para centrales termoeléctricas. 1_07_2010
Citation preview
Small Solar Thermal Power Systems/ Pequeños Sistemas
para Centrales Solares Termoeléctricas
Jornada de difusión técnica
Madrid, 1 de julio de 2010
UNION EUROPEAFONDO SOCIAL EUROPEO
• Mission:• To promote the development of renewable
energies.• To promote the development of clean energy
technologies having none or minimum environmental impact.
• Research topics:• Solar energy (high flux/high temperature).• Sustainable fuels: biofuels, wastes, hydrogen.• Energy storage.• Smart energy networks.• Efficient end-use of energy• CO2 valorisation
• 40 Researchers (18 PhD; 16 from foreign R&D Centers)
IMDEA Energía
Development of efficient and cost-effective high temperature technologies and applications with special emphasis on Concentrating Solar Power Systems and production of Solar Fuels and Chemicals.
Objectives
Modular concepts with minimum environmental impact
Advanced thermal fluids for high temperature applications and energy storage
Solar receivers and reactors Solar concentration optics High flux/high temperature characterization
techniques and simulation tools Efficient integration schemes into power
conversion systems
Solar-driven high temperature production of H2 /Chemicals
R&D lines
High Temperature Processes Unit
Source: Photon International (December 2009)- Spain: 831 MW grid-connected by December 2010 and permits assigned for 2,5 GW by 2013.- USA: Near- to medium-term CSP pipeline over 10 GW,
with 4.5 GW to break ground by the end of 2010.
CSP in the world
Impact of 1-2¢ adderfor green power
Conventional Technology
for Peaking or Intermediate Power (IEA market assumptions)
Initial SEGS Plants
Concentrating Solar Power:
Cost and Availability
Larger SEGS Plants
O&M Cost Reduction at SEGS Plants
Scale-up and
early experience
AdvancedTechnology
Large-scale deployment
• Future costs depend on many things– technology progress– production rates and continuity– political, economic, and financial issues– market needs and acceptance
Scale-up and
early
experienceAdvanced
Technology Large-scale deployment
Commercial projects use technologies of parabolic troughs with low concentration in two dimensions and linear focus, or systems of central tower and heliostat fields, operating with thermal fluids at relatively modest temperatures, below 400 ºC .
The most immediate consequences of these conservative designs are:
the use of systems with efficiencies below 20% nominal in the conversion of direct solar radiation to electricity,
the tight limitation in the use of efficient energy storage systems,
the high water consumption and land extension due to the inefficiency of the integration with the power block,
the lack of rational schemes for their integration in distributed generation architectures and
the limitation to reach the temperatures needed for the generation processes following thermochemical routes of solar fuels like hydrogen.
Limitations of first-generation CSP
Extresol 1 and 2 (ACS/Cobra)
PS10 and PS20 (Abengoa Solar)
40
80
50
60
100
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Year
70
Pro
du
cti
on
cost 90
Scaling up15%
R+D60%
Market series25%
Impact of innovation on cost reduction
· hybrid gas combined cycle
coal, fuel oil, or gas steam cycle
Dispatchability: hybridization with gas or liquid
fuels for extended Stirling or Brayton engine operation
thermal storage for peaking, load following, or extended operation
Concentrating Solar Power:
Applications and Features
Manufacturing:
Relatively conventional technology (glass, steel, gears, heat engines, etc.) allows rapid manufacturing scale-up, low risk, conventional maintenance
Distributed Power• distributed, on-grid (e.g., line support)• stand-alone, off-grid (e.g., water pumping,
village electrification)
kW's to MW’s
Dispatchable Power• utility peak and intermediate• high-value, green markets
10's to 100’s of MW's
Aprovechamiento Térmico de la Energía Solar de manera Gestionable, Eficiente y Modular en Sistemas de Alta Concentración
Tem
pera
tura
Receptores Aceite
ReceptoresAgua/vapor
Receptores Sodio
Receptores Sales nitrosas
Receptores metálicos aire
Actualidad
Motores Stirling solarizados
Receptores cerámicos
Baja presión Alta temperatura
Receptores cerámicos
Alta presión Alta temperatura Receptores
Partículas sólidas
Conceptos tecnológicos ACTUALES Conceptos tecnológicos AVANZADOS
• Calentamiento de vapor
• Ciclo Rankine• Calentamiento de vapor
• Calentamiento aire• Ciclo Rankine• Calentamiento de vapor
• Ciclo Brayton• Precalentamiento aire
• Disco Stirling
• Calentamiento aire
• Ciclo Brayton• Calentamiento aire
• Combustibles y química• Ciclo Brayton• Calentamiento aire
500
ºC10
00 ºC
1500
ºC
SOLGEMAC
TODAY Conservative first-generation schemes
SOLGEMAC Efficiency (high-temperature/high-flux) Dispatchability (storage/hybrid) Modularity (small size) Environmental impact (water) Solar fuels
SOLGEMAC(Imdea Energía Coord.)
A.3. ENERGY STORAGE FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION CONCENTRATING SOLAR SYSTEMS.
A.3.1.Hydrogen production with thermochemical cyclesA.3.2. Hydrogen storage with MOF-type materiales.A.3.3. Electrochemical storageA.3.4. End-use of hydrogen in microturbines
URJC (Coord.)CIEMAT-DQCIEMAT-SSCImdea EnergíaUAMINTAHynergreen
A.1. MODULAR CONCENTRATING SYSTEMS
A.1.1. Systemas dish/StirlingA.1.2. Multitower Modular ArraysA.1.3. Solarization of gas microturbines
Imdea Energía (Coord.)
INTA
CIEMAT-SSC
TORRESOL
A.2. SOLAR RECEIVERS/REACTORS FOR HIGH FLUX/HIGH TEMPERATURES.
A.2.1. Volumetric receivers with metallic absorbersA.2.2. Volumetric receivers with ceramic absorbersA.2.3. Particle receiversA.2.4. Materials
CIEMAT-SSC (Coord.)Imdea EnergíaURJCTORRESOLHynergreen
A4. INTEGRATIONA.4.1. Comparison of technologiesA.4.2. Integration schemesA.4.3. LCA and impact
INTA (Coord.)URJC, Imdea Energía, CIEMAT-SSC, CIEMAT-DQ, TORRESOL, Hynergreen
MODULARITY DISPATCHABILITYEFFICIENCY
INTEGRATION
STEPS TO SCALING-UP SOLAR CSP & CSFC
30-50 kWSolar Furnace
1-100 MW Central Receiver System
100-500 kWMini-tower
1-5 kWSolar Simulator
Discos parabólicos
Motor solar de Augustin Mouchot en la exposición de
Paris de 1861 ParisDiscos-Stirling Eurodish en la Plataforma Solar de Almería
Motores Stirling avanzados están mostrando altas eficiencias y durabilidades
Varios diseños de disco y de receptor han demostrado la alta eficiencia necesaria para sistemas comerciales
La durabilidad del receptor aún necesita mejorarse
El coste del disco colector/concentrador es crítico para dar paso a las primeras producciones comerciales.
Discos Parabólicos con generador Stirling:
Estado de la Tecnología
STMSolo
Expectations for Cost Degression
PrototypeStuttgart
1989
DISTAL 11991
DISTAL 21995
EuroDish2000/2001
100/Year 1000/Year 3000/Year 10000/Year
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
Inve
stm
ent
cos
t in
k€
Transport, AssemblyConcentrator DrivesStirlingmotorControlTurntableFoundation
Pequeños sistemas de receptor central
Multitower arrays
Configuraciones multitorrePequeños campos con pequeños helióstatos
ACTF de Georgia
• Planta construida en Italia y montada en los EEUU en el año 1977 en el Instituto Tecnológico de Georgia (Advanced Component Test Facility)
• 550 helióstatos
• Potencia térmica 400 kW.
• Campo octogonal y torre central (22,8 m)
• Foco rectangular de 2,44 m.
• Espejos con seguimiento polar y tracking colectivo.
• Planta construida en Italia y montada en los EEUU en el año 1977 en el Instituto Tecnológico de Georgia (Advanced Component Test Facility)
• 550 helióstatos
• Potencia térmica 400 kW.
• Campo octogonal y torre central (22,8 m)
• Foco rectangular de 2,44 m.
• Espejos con seguimiento polar y tracking colectivo.
Mini-campos con mini-helióstatos agrupados: Recordando al Prof. Francia
Sistemas modulares multitorre
Comparison of Solar Power Technologies with respect to Integration in the Urban Environment
P. Schramek, D.R. Mills and W. Lang
• Origin: In 1972 by US HUD. Related to Total Energy Systems, Power Islands, District Heating, Energy Cascade and Cogeneration
• Distributed Utility structure for large residential, commercial or institutional building complexes.
• Typical size: 300-1,000 dwelling units• Reduction of transmission and distribution costs• Modular track of demand and spread construction costs
over time• Maximum utilization about 4,500 hours • Use of single-cycle high efficiency gas turbines plus waste
heat applications like district heating, cooling, desalination or water treatment
• Increment of solar share to 50 %
Advantages of the MIUS concept
The keys for CRS in MIUS
• Find a niche of size (a few MWe)
• Find modular small CRS design
• Competitive investment cost
• Perform with high efficiencies
Domestic and auxiliaryelectricity
Compressionair-conditioning
Fuel
Air
Absorptionchiller
Hot water
Auxiliary boilerFuel
Water
Space heating
Domestic hot waterSteam
Water
Exhaust gases
Hot gases
SOLAR TOWER
60,526 GJ 5.50 GWhe
5.29 GWhe
0.21 GWhe
12,000 GJ
22,000 GJ
2,690 GJ
13,280 GJ
Rejected heat22,793 GWh
11,023 GJ
7,965 GJ
Wasted4,252 GJ
14,690 GJ
INTEGRATION OF CRS INTO MIUS STRUCTURE
Example of a 450-unit apartment complex in Spain
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Solar Time (h)
Po
wer
Dem
and
(kW
e)
October
November
December
January
February
March
april
may
June
July
August
September
MIUS Solar Tower: Application to a shopping center
- Stable demand
- 85 % during day-time
- High consumption at peak periods
- Monthly differences between 800-1,300 kW
- Demand increase between June and October.
- Peaks in July and Christmas
Operation strategy:
- Night-time: Grid
- From 6:00 to 20:00 solar hybrid turbine in power island mode
Demand from 6 to 20 h: 4,348 MWe and 18,890 MWth
Proposal of a small-size tower plant
Small tower and heliostats that reduce visual impact and achieve higher field efficiencies (up to 4% more than large area heliostats).
Air as heat transfer media in a pressurized volumetric receiver (3.4 MWth outlet).
Use of an efficient (39.5 %) small solar-gas turbine (1.36 MWe) with intercooling, heat recuperation and low working temperature (860 ºC).
Waste heat (670 kWth) at 198 ºC for water heating and space cooling/heating.
Operation in a fuel-saver mode As in the case of dish system parks, the small tower
fields for distributed power should target maximum unattended operation, to minimize O&M costs.
MIUS solar tower technical specifications
Tower optical height (m)Number heliostatsHeliostat surface (m2)Receiver surface (m2)Receiver tilt angle (º)Land (m2)
26345
19.216.5
3038,000
Design point Power Efficiency
DNI (W/m2)Power onto mirrors area (MWt)Gross power onto receiver (MWt)Power to turbine (MWt)Gross electric power (MWe)Total efficiency
8755.84.33.41.4----
----100 %
74 %80 %39 %23 %
InvestmentHeliostatsLandTowerReceiverInst.&ControlPower blockFixed cost
995,765 $62,745 $
104,575 $484,750 $107,000 $
1,146,000 $65,350 $
Direct capital cost 2.97 M$Installed cost (including turbine set) 2,120 $/kW
Electrical power 1,407 kWeThermal power 1,200 kWthFuel consumption 3,280 kWHeat rate 8,392 kJ/kWhElectrical efficiency 42.9 %Thermal efficiency 36.6 %Total efficiency 79.5 %NOx emission <20 g/GJ
Heron H1 Technical Specifications
1.36 MWe
Recuperator
HPC LPC
C2 C3 PT
PR=3.0
PR=3.0 PR=2.7
8.9 bar151 ºC
Intercooler
3.0 bar25 ºC
3.0 bar137 ºC
1.0 bar15 ºC
Air filter
1.0 bar15 ºC Air inlet
m=5.15 kg/s
1.0 bar198 ºC
1.0 bar573 ºC
8.9 bar573 ºC
8.9 bar860 ºC
3.1 bar635 ºC
3.1 bar860 ºC
Heatflow SOLAR R1-R6 = 1.95 MWHeatflow SOLAR R7-R10 = 1.49 MW
Total = 3.44 MW
C1
R3R2R1
R6R5R4
R7 R8
R9 R10
661 ºC 757 ºC740 ºC
Theoretical solarization based on Turbine Heron H-1 and 10 pressurized volumetric receivers
MIUS Solar Tower: Application to a shopping center
Solar electricity production = 2,456 MWhFossil electricity production = 1,892 MWhSolar electricity excess = 428 MWh
MIUS Solar Tower: Application to a shopping center
56 % power demand supplied by solar (683 toe)
Few hours at loads of 20 % during start-ups
Typical solar working load 75 %
MIUS Solar Tower: Application to a shopping center
Solar is contributing to the waste heat produced with 4,374 GJ that represents 49.5% of the heat demand.
CONCLUSIONS
CSP is focusing its growth still on first generation large-fields
The solar field should be small and modular to account for the maximum flexibility in approaching real systems.
Up to 60% future cost reduction should come from R&D.
Solgemac project objectives are modularity, dispatchability and efficiency by high flux/high T.
A potential niche for the application of dish-engine systems and small solar towers to Modular Integrated Utility Systems has been identified.