1
Newsdesk and a simple spatial-attention task, the researchers measured the brain activity from the acute stroke phase to 9 months after stroke. Patients with lesions localised in the right frontal lobe had altered brain activity in several nodes in the dorsal, ventral parietal, frontal network involved in attention. In the acute phase there was hyperactivity in the contralateral hemisphere and reduced activity in the attention network in the lesioned hemisphere, over time, unusual patterns of activity became less prominent. These changes in cortical activity coincided with functional recovery. In an accompanying commentary, Yalçin Abdullaev and Michael I Posner write “the most striking change was that the dorsal right parietal lobe, which was not activated at all during the acute phase, was now strongly activated in the chronic phase” (Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1424–25). “We show that spatial attention deficits and their recovery do not depend just on the structural damage in the stroke area, but on the functional effects of this lesion on the activity pattern in distant areas”, Corbetta told The Lancet Neurology. Declining activity in the contralateral hemisphere from the acute to the chronic phase and the concomitant decrease in neglect seems to depend largely on recovery in a right parietal area. This asymmetrical dominance of attention helps to explain why left- sided neglect is more common than right-sided neglect. Corbetta says that their findings raise several question about how lesions in different brain regions affect neglect, whether hyperactivity in the intact hemisphere is associated with degree of neglect, and whether suppression of activity with transcranial magnetic stimulation might aid functional recovery. Peter Hayward http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 4 December 2005 801 Mutations that cause structural damage to a protein encoded on chromosome 13, or that reduce the production of the functional version, could be partly responsible for Tourette’s syndrome (Science 2005; 310: 317–20). People with Tourette’s syndrome have motor tics and involuntary vocalisations, usually accompanied by other problems ranging from obsessive-compulsive disorder to impulse control difficulties. Although the disorder has a genetic component, researchers have been unable to pinpoint the genes involved. “Knowing where to draw the line between Tourette’s syndrome and related disorders, like obsessive compulsive disorder, can be difficult”, explains study leader Matthew State (Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA). “This, plus the likely contribution of many genes, gene–environment interactions, and other confounding factors have hindered gene mapping through genetic linkage or association studies.” In an alternative approach, State’s team genetically screened a child with Tourette’s syndrome whose family had no history of the disorder, and identified an inversion on chromosome 13. “We reasoned that this patient’s problems might be caused by disruption of gene structure or function at the breakage point”, explains State. Indeed, the researchers identified the gene SLITRK1 in the breakage region, the product of which is normally expressed in large quantities in areas of the brain thought to be affected in Tourette’s syndrome, although the coding region was not damaged. However, when the researchers looked at another 174 people with the disorder they found one with a clear mutation in this area—a frameshift rendering the SLITRK1 product useless—and two others with a mutation just outside the coding region in an area regulating the production of the functional protein. This latter mutation affected the binding of a microRNA, inhibiting the final synthesis of SLITRK1. “In further experiments we saw that SLITRK1’s protein was involved in dendrite growth”, explains State, “and that cells [with mutations] produced less of it. So, any mutation reducing protein formation would potentially promote Tourette’s syndrome in some people.” “Although this gene abnormality accounts for only a small percentage of patients with Tourette’s syndrome, this finding is certainly a move in the right direction”, remarked Joseph Jankovic (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA). “But this disorder almost certainly has a polygenic aetiology. Working out which genes affect which people [with which phenotype], and how to transfer this knowledge into clinical advances will be a long process.” Adrian Burton SLITRK1 trouble in Tourette’s syndrome Dorsal parietal regions direct attention to images that we expect to impress Dr Fred Espenak/Science Photo Library Rights were not granted to include this image in electronic media. Please refer to the printed journal.

SLITRK1 trouble in Tourette's syndrome

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Newsdesk

and a simple spatial-attention task,the researchers measured the brainactivity from the acute stroke phase to9 months after stroke.

Patients with lesions localised in theright frontal lobe had altered brainactivity in several nodes in the dorsal,ventral parietal, frontal networkinvolved in attention. In the acutephase there was hyperactivity in thecontralateral hemisphere and reducedactivity in the attention network in thelesioned hemisphere, over time,unusual patterns of activity becameless prominent. These changes incortical activity coincided withfunctional recovery. In anaccompanying commentary, YalçinAbdullaev and Michael I Posner write“the most striking change was that thedorsal right parietal lobe, which wasnot activated at all during the acutephase, was now strongly activated in

the chronic phase” (Nat Neurosci 2005;8: 1424–25).

“We show that spatial attentiondeficits and their recovery do notdepend just on the structural damagein the stroke area, but on thefunctional effects of this lesion on theactivity pattern in distant areas”,Corbetta told The Lancet Neurology.

Declining activity in the contralateralhemisphere from the acute to thechronic phase and the concomitantdecrease in neglect seems to dependlargely on recovery in a right parietalarea. This asymmetrical dominance ofattention helps to explain why left-sided neglect is more common thanright-sided neglect.

Corbetta says that their findingsraise several question about howlesions in different brain regions affectneglect, whether hyperactivity in theintact hemisphere is associated with

degree of neglect, and whethersuppression of activity withtranscranial magnetic stimulationmight aid functional recovery.

Peter Hayward

http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 4 December 2005 801

Mutations that cause structuraldamage to a protein encoded onchromosome 13, or that reduce theproduction of the functional version,could be partly responsible forTourette’s syndrome (Science 2005;310: 317–20).

People with Tourette’s syndromehave motor tics and involuntaryvocalisations, usually accompanied byother problems ranging fromobsessive-compulsive disorder toimpulse control difficulties. Althoughthe disorder has a genetic component,researchers have been unable topinpoint the genes involved.

“Knowing where to draw the linebetween Tourette’s syndrome andrelated disorders, like obsessivecompulsive disorder, can be difficult”,explains study leader Matthew State(Yale University, New Haven, CT,USA). “This, plus the likelycontribution of many genes,gene–environment interactions, andother confounding factors havehindered gene mapping through

genetic linkage or associationstudies.”

In an alternative approach, State’steam genetically screened a child withTourette’s syndrome whose familyhad no history of the disorder, andidentified an inversion onchromosome 13. “We reasoned thatthis patient’s problems might becaused by disruption of gene structureor function at the breakage point”,explains State.

Indeed, the researchers identifiedthe gene SLITRK1 in the breakageregion, the product of which isnormally expressed in large quantitiesin areas of the brain thought to beaffected in Tourette’s syndrome,although the coding region was notdamaged. However, when theresearchers looked at another 174people with the disorder they foundone with a clear mutation in thisarea—a frameshift rendering theSLITRK1 product useless—and twoothers with a mutation just outsidethe coding region in an area regulating

the production of the functionalprotein. This latter mutation affectedthe binding of a microRNA, inhibitingthe final synthesis of SLITRK1.

“In further experiments we saw thatSLITRK1’s protein was involved indendrite growth”, explains State, “andthat cells [with mutations] producedless of it. So, any mutation reducingprotein formation would potentiallypromote Tourette’s syndrome in somepeople.”

“Although this gene abnormalityaccounts for only a small percentageof patients with Tourette’s syndrome,this finding is certainly a move in theright direction”, remarked JosephJankovic (Baylor College of Medicine,Houston, TX, USA). “But this disorderalmost certainly has a polygenicaetiology. Working out which genesaffect which people [with whichphenotype], and how to transfer thisknowledge into clinical advances willbe a long process.”

Adrian Burton

SLITRK1 trouble in Tourette’s syndrome

Dorsal parietal regions direct attention to imagesthat we expect to impress

Dr F

red

Espe

nak/

Scie

nce

Phot

o Li

brar

y

Rights were notgranted to include

this image in electronic media.

Please refer to theprinted journal.