Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Site Servicing and Stormwater Management Brief ndash 2070 Scott Street Ottawa ON
File 16041024983
May 29 2020
Prepared for Azure Urban Developments Inc Prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd
Revision Description Author Quality Check Independent Review 0 1st submission A Paerez 10022019 K Kilborn 10022019 T Rathnasooriya 10022019 0 2nd submission W Johnson 05292020 K Kilborn 05292020 A Paerez 05292020
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
This document entitled Site Servicing and Stormwater Management Brief ndash 2070 Scott Street Ottawa ON was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd (ldquoStantecrdquo) for the account of Azure Urban Developments Inc (the ldquoClientrdquo) Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited The material in it reflects Stantecrsquos professional judgment in light of the scope schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes In preparing the document Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind if any suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document
Prepared by (signature)
Ana M Paerez P Eng
Reviewed by (signature)
Kris Kilborn
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Table of Contents
10 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE 11 11 OBJECTIVE 12
20 REFERENCES 21
30 WATER DISTRIBUTION 31
40 SANITARY SEWER 41 41 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA 42
50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 51 51 OBJECTIVES 51 52 EXISTING CONDITIONS 51 53 SWM CRITERIA AND CONSTRAINTS 51 54 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN 52
541 Design Methodology 52 542 Water Quantity Control 52 543 Allowable Release Rate 53 544 Storage Requirements 53 545 Uncontrolled Area 53 546 Results 54
60 GRADING AND DRAINAGE61
70 UTILITIES71
80 EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION 81
90 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PHASE II ESA 91 91 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 91 92 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 93
921 Environmental Remedial Action Plan 93
100 CONCLUSIONS 101 101 WATER SERVICING 101 102 SANITARY SERVICING 101 103 STORMWATER SERVICING 101 104 GRADING 101 105 UTILITIES 102 106 APPROVAL PERMITS 102
LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Estimated Water Demands 31 Table 2 Boundary Conditions 32
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Table 3 Estimated Wastewater Peak Flow 41 Table 4 Target Release Rate 53 Table 5 Peak Controlled (Tributary) 2-Year Release Rate 53 Table 6 Peak Controlled (Tributary) 100-Year Release Rate 53 Table 7 Peak Uncontrolled (Non-tributary) 2-Year Release Rate 54 Table 8 Peak Uncontrolled (Non-tributary) 100-Year Release Rate 54 Table 9 Estimated Discharge from Site (2-Year) 54 Table 10 Estimated Discharge From Site (100-Year) 54
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location 12
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A WATER CALCULATIONS A1
APPENDIX B PROPOSED SITE PLAN B1
APPENDIX C SANITARY SEWER CALCULATIONS C1
APPENDIX D STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS D1
APPENDIX E GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT E1
APPENDIX F CITY OF OTTAWA SERVICING STUDY CHECKLIST F1
APPENDIX G CIVIL COMMENTS AND RESPONSE G1
APPENDIX H DRAWINGS H1
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Introduction and Objective
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 11
10 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
The following revised Site Servicing and Stormwater Management (SWM) report has been prepared to reflect the revised site plan which includes the existing residential property on 328 Winona Avenue and to address City comments to the first engineering submission of December 2019 A summary of the civil-related comments and responses is included in Appendix G The results of the revised servicing analyses are summarized in this report while the drawings have been revised to reflect the revised site plan
Stantec Consulting Ltd has been retained by Azure Urban Developments Inc to prepare the following site servicing and stormwater management (SWM) brief to satisfy the City of Ottawa Zoning and Site Plan Control Application process The site is located at 20702090 Scott Street in the south-east quadrant of the intersection of Churchill Avenue and Scott Street in the city of Ottawa (see Figure 1 below)
The site proposed for re-development measures 021 ha The proposed re-development area was previously occupied by a three-storey building a one-storey car service station and paved parking areas and a residential dwelling on Winona Avenue The proposed development consists of a twenty-five-storey commercialresidential building with 243 units four levels of underground parking and associated access and servicing infrastructure The proposed building will include retail space indoor and outdoor amenity areas 4 town-homes 122 one-bedroom apartments 50 two-bedroom apartments 22 three-bedroom apartments 45 studio apartments underground parking and a bicycle storage room As agreed with the owner of the adjacent residential property on 330 Winona Avenue the southern portion of the site which consists of a driveway access to a shed within the adjacent property will remain unchanged (see Drawing SSP-1) The proposed site plan has been included in Appendix B
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Introduction and Objective
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 12
Figure 1 Site Location
11 OBJECTIVE
This site servicing and SWM brief has been prepared to present a servicing scheme that is free of conflicts and which utilizes the existing infrastructure as obtained from available as-built drawings and in consultation with City of Ottawa staff Infrastructure requirements for water supply sanitary and storm sewer services are presented in this report
Criteria and constraints provided by the City of Ottawa have been used as a basis for the conceptual servicing design of the proposed development Specific elements and potential development constraints to be addressed are as follows
bull Prepare a grading plan in accordance with the proposed site plan and existing grades
bull Storm Sewer Servicing
o Define major and minor conveyance systems in conjunction with the proposed grading plan
o Determine the stormwater management storage requirements to meet the allowable release rate for the site
o Coordinate with mechanical engineer to convey drainage from roof tops amenity areas and private terrace areas to the internal cistern and discharge to the proposed storm service lateral at the allowable release rate
o Define and size the proposed storm service lateral that will be connected to the existing 675 mm diameter storm sewer on Winona Avenue
bull Wastewater Servicing
SITE
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Introduction and Objective
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 13
o Define and size the sanitary service lateral which will be connected to the existing 225 mm diameter sanitary sewer on Winona Avenue
bull Water Servicing
o Estimate water demands to characterize the proposed feed for the proposed development which will be serviced from the existing 200 mm diameter watermain on Scott Street and the 150 mm diameter watermain on Winona Avenue
o Watermain servicing for the development is to be able to provide average day and maximum day (including peak hour) demands (ie non-emergency conditions) at pressures within the acceptable range of 50 to 70 psi (350 to 480 kPa)
o Under fire flow (emergency) conditions the water distribution system is to maintain a minimum pressure greater than 20 psi (140 kPa)
The accompanying drawings included in the back of this report illustrate the proposed internal servicing scheme for the site
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
References
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 21
20 REFERENCES
The following background studies have been referenced during the preliminary servicing design of the proposed site
bull City of Ottawa Design Guidelines ndash Water Distribution City of Ottawa July 2010 bull City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines City of Ottawa October 2012 bull Technical Bulletin ISDTB-2014-01 City of Ottawa February 2014 bull Technical Bulletin ISTB-2018-01 City of Ottawa March 21 2018 bull Technical Bulletin ISTB-2018-02 City of Ottawa March 21 2018 bull Technical Bulletin ISTB-2018-03 City of Ottawa March 21 2018 bull Technical Bulletin PIEDTB -2016-01 City of Ottawa September 6 2016 bull Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Multi-Storey Building 2070 Scott Street ndash Ottawa
Paterson Group July 26 2019 bull Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 2070 Scott Street ndash Ottawa Paterson Group
September 10 2019 bull Environmental Remedial Action Plant 2070 Scott Street and 328 Winona Avenue ndash Ottawa
Paterson Group April 8 2020
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Water Distribution
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 31
30 WATER DISTRIBUTION
The proposed building is located in Pressure Zone 1W of the City of Ottawarsquos Water Distribution System The proposed development will be serviced through the existing 200 mm diameter watermain on Scott Street and the 150 mm watermain on Winona Avenue as shown on the Site Servicing Plan (see Drawing SSP-1)
The proposed twenty-five-storey building is to be a high-rise commercialresidential building with retail space four levels of underground parking 4 town homes and a mix of one-bedroom (167 units) two-bedroom (50 units) and three bedroom apartments (22 units) for a total of 243 units The building is to have a total floor space of approximately 16977 m2 above grade
Water demands were calculated using the City of Ottawa Water Distribution Guidelines (July 2010) to determine the typical operating pressures to be expected at the building (see detailed calculations in Appendix A) A daily rate of 350 Lcapday has been applied for the population of the proposed site The average daily (AVDY) residential demand was estimated for an occupancy of 14 persons per unit for a one-bedroom apartment 21 persons per unit for a two-bedroom apartment 31 persons per unit for a three-bedroom apartment and 27 persons per unit for townhomes Water demands for the proposed retail space (509 m2) were estimated based on 28000 Lhaday Maximum day (MXDY) demands were determined by multiplying the AVDY demands by a factor of 25 for residential areas and by a factor of 15 for commercial areas Peak hourly (PKHR) demands were determined by multiplying the MXDY demands by a factor of 22 for residential areas and by a factor of 18 for commercial areas The estimated demands are summarized in Table 1
Table 1 Estimated Water Demands
PopulationArea AVDY (Ls) MXDY (Ls) PKHR (Ls) Residential 418 persons 169 423 931
Commercial 509 m2 002 002 004 Total Site 171 426 935
The fire flow requirement was calculated in accordance with Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) and determined to be approximately 7000 Lmin (1167 Ls) The FUS estimate is based on a non-combustible construction building with a two-hour fire separation considered between each floor per requirements for buildings over six-storeys as per the Ontario Building Code (OBC) and vertical openings and external vertical communications properly protected (one-hour rating) As a result the floor area was estimated as the area of the largest floor plus 25 of each of the two immediately adjoining floors Additionally it is anticipated that all buildings will be sprinklered with final sprinkler design to conform to NFPA 13 (see detailed calculations in Appendix A)
Table 2 outlines the boundary conditions provided by the City of Ottawa on September 6 2019 for the estimated water demands shown in Table 1
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Water Distribution
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 32
Table 2 Boundary Conditions
Connection 1 (Scott Street) Connection 2 (Winona Avenue) Min HGL (m) 1087 1087 Max HGL (m) 1150 1150
Max Day + Fire Flow (100 Ls) 1090 950
The desired normal operating objective pressure range as per the City of Ottawa 2010 Water Distribution Design Guidelines is 350 kPa (50 psi) to 480kPa (70 psi) and no less than 275kPa (40 psi) at ground elevation Furthermore the maximum pressure at any point in the water distribution should not exceed 100 psi as per the Ontario BuildingPlumbing Code pressure reducing measures are required to service areas where pressures greater than 552kPa (80 psi) are anticipated
The ground elevation at the intersection of Scott Street and Winona Avenue close to where the proposed building is to be connected is approximately 6360 m With respect to the peak hour flow conditions the resulting boundary condition HGL of 1087 m corresponds to a peak hour pressure of 441 kPa (64 psi) Since the proposed building is a 25-storey building an additional 34 kPa (5 psi) for every additional storey over two storeys is required to account for the change in elevation head and additional headloss Given that the lowest pressure is expected to be 441 kPa (64 psi) at ground level there will be insufficient pressure to reach the top floors and as a result a pump will be required to maintain an acceptable level of service on the higher floors
A maximum pressure check can be conducted using the buildingrsquos lowest finished floor elevation (6340 m for the townhomes) and the maximum boundary condition HGL of 1150 m This results in a pressure of 5160 m or 503 kPa (73 psi) This value is below the limit of 80 psi which would require pressure reducing valves
In regard to available fire flow boundary conditions provided by the City confirm that a flow rate of 6000 Lmin (100 Ls) would have a residual pressure of 441 kPa (64 psi) on Scott Street (ground elevation of 6380 m) and a residual pressure of 310 kPa (45 psi) on Winona Avenue (ground elevation of 6337 m) The fire flow rate should be achievable within the watermain at this proposed location while maintaining a residual pressure of 138kPa (20 psi) However the fire flow requirement for the proposed building which has a slightly bigger footprint is 7000 Lmin (117 Ls) It is expected that acceptable residual pressures will be maintained at this increased fire flow requirement but this will be confirmed in the next submission once the revised boundary conditions are received
In conclusion based on the boundary conditions available the 200 mm diameter watermain on Scott Street and the 150 mm diameter watermain on Winona Avenue provide adequate fire flow capacity as per the Fire Underwriters Survey In order to meet the City water supply objective that limits a single feed to 50 m3d during basic day demands three connections are required to service the proposed building two connections to the existing 200 mm diameter watermain on Scott Street separated by a new isolation valve and a third connection to the 150
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Water Distribution
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 33
mm diameter watermain on Winona Avenue The service connections will be capable of providing anticipated demands to the lower storeys but will require a booster pump to maintain minimum pressures of 350 kPa (50 psi) for floors 6 to 25
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Sanitary Sewer
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 41
40 SANITARY SEWER
As illustrated on Drawing SSP-1 sanitary servicing for the proposed development will be provided through a proposed 150 mm diameter service lateral connecting to the existing 225 mm diameter sanitary sewer running north on Winona Avenue The 225 mm Winona Avenue public sewer ultimately discharges to a 375 mm diameter sanitary sewer at the intersection of Winona Avenue and Scott Street
The proposed 021 ha re-development area will consist of a high-rise commercialresidential building with retail space four levels of underground parking 4 town homes and a mix of one-bedroom (167 units) two-bedroom (50 units) and three bedroom apartments (22 units) for a total of 243 units The anticipated wastewater peak flow generated from the proposed development is summarized in Table 3 below while a sanitary sewer design sheet is included in Appendix C
Table 3 Estimated Wastewater Peak Flow ResidentialCommercial Peak Flows
Infiltration Flow (Ls)
Total Peak Flow (Ls)
of UnitsArea Population Peak
Factor
Peak Flow (Ls)
Residential 243 units 418 40 542 007 551 Commercial 0050 ha NA 15 002 1 Average residential flow based on 280 Lpday 2 Peak factor for residential units calculated using Harmonrsquos formula 3 Apartment population estimated based on 14 personsunit for one-bedroom apartments 21 personsunit for
two-bedroom apartments and 31 personsunit for three-bedroom apartments 4 Townhome population estimated based on 27 personsunit 5 Commercial peak flows estimated based on 28000 Lhaday 6 Infiltration flow based on 033 Lsha
The proposed sewage peak flows were provided to City of Ottawa staff to conduct a capacity analysis of the sanitary sewer system in the vicinity of the site and confirmation was received that there are no concerns with respect to adding the proposed sanitary peak flows to the existing sewers on Winona Avenue and Scott Street (see correspondence in Appendix C)
Detailed sanitary sewage calculations are included in Appendix C A backflow preventer will be required for the proposed building in accordance with the Ottawa sewer design guide and will be coordinated with building mechanical engineers
All underground parking drains should be connected to the buildingrsquos internal plumbing A sump pump will be required to drain the underground parking levels to the existing sanitary sewer on Winona Avenue
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Sanitary Sewer
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 42
41 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA
As outlined in the City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines and the MECPrsquos Design Guidelines for Sewage Works the following criteria were used to calculate estimated wastewater flow rates and to size the sanitary sewer lateral
bull Minimum Velocity ndash 06 ms (08 ms for upstream sections) bull Maximum Velocity ndash 30 ms bull Manning roughness coefficient for all smooth wall pipes ndash 0013 bull 14 personsone-bedroom apartment bull 21 personstwo-bedroom apartment bull 31 personsthree-bedroom apartment bull 27 personstownhome bull 28000 Lhaday for commercial areas bull Harmonrsquos Formula for Residential Peak Factor ndash Max = 40 bull Commercial Peak Factor of 15 bull Extraneous Flow Allowance ndash 033 Lsha (conservative value) bull Manhole Spacing ndash 120 m bull Minimum Cover ndash 25 m
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Stormwater Management
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 51
50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
51 OBJECTIVES
The objective of this stormwater management plan is to determine the measures necessary to control the quantity of stormwater released from the proposed development to the required levels and to provide sufficient detail for approval and construction
52 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed re-development area was previously occupied by a three-storey building a one-storey car service station and paved parking areas and a residential dwelling on 328 Winona Avenue As agreed with the owner of the adjacent residential property on 330 Winona Avenue the southern portion of the site which consists of a driveway access to a shed within the adjacent property will remain unchanged and as such it has not been included in the SWM calculations The previous site located at the intersection of Churchill Avenue and Scott Street was serviced through the existing 900 mm diameter storm sewer on Scott Street and included a network of catchbasins that captured runoff from paved parking areas Similarly the previous site located at the intersection of Winona Avenue and Scott Street was serviced through the existing 675 mm diameter storm sewer on Winona Avenue and included a network of catchbasins that captured runoff from paved parking areas (see Drawing EX-1)
City of Ottawa staff recommended stormwater management peak flows from the proposed site be restricted to the 2-year with a runoff coefficient of 060 The proposed 2070 Scott Street re-development encompasses approximately 0205 ha of land (excludes existing driveway area to remain unchanged in the southern portion of the site area EX-1) which assuming a time of concentration (Tc) of 10 minutes results in an allowable peak outflow of Q = 278 x C x I x A = 278 x 060 x 7681 x 0205 = 263 Ls
53 SWM CRITERIA AND CONSTRAINTS
The stormwater management criteria for the proposed site are based on City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines (2012) and on consultation with City of Ottawa Staff The following summarizes the criteria used in the preparation of this stormwater management plan
bull Control post development peak flows up to the 100-year storm to the 2-year runoff with a runoff coefficient (C) of 060 which corresponds to 263 Ls
bull Size storm sewers using an inlet time of concentration (Tc) of 10 minutes
bull Post-development runoff coefficient (C) value based on proposed impervious areas as per site plan drawing (see Appendix B)
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Stormwater Management
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 52
54 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN
The proposed 021 ha re-development area consists of 4 town homes retail space and a mix of one-bedroom (167 units) two-bedroom (50 units) and three bedroom apartments (22 units) for a total of 243 units underground parking and associated access infrastructure The imperviousness of the proposed site is 87 (C = 081)
The SWM strategy for the site is to provide an underground cistern to attenuate peak flows in the downstream system to the allowable release rate of 263 Ls The proposed building will capture storm drainage through a combination of uncontrolled roof drains a ditch inlet catchbasin in a swale capturing runoff along the southern property line and amenity area drains that will direct peak flows to a cistern located in the underground parking for attenuation Controlled peak flows from the cistern will be pumped at the north east corner of the building and ultimately discharged into the existing 675 mm diameter storm sewer on Winona Avenue Coordination with the mechanical consultant will be commenced and current plans will be provided and flows identified to size the internal system and the underground cistern
The proposed site plan drainage areas and proposed storm sewer infrastructure are shown on Drawing SD-1
541 Design Methodology
The intent of the stormwater management plan presented herein is to mitigate any negative impact that the proposed development could have on the existing drainage and storm sewer infrastructure while providing adequate capacity to service the proposed building parking and access areas The proposed stormwater management plan is designed to detain runoff in an underground cistern to ensure that peak flows after construction from the proposed re-development area will not exceed the target release rate for the site
A portion of the site could not be graded to enter the buildingrsquos internal plumbing system and as such it will sheet drain uncontrolled Runoff from these uncontrolled area is included in the overall site discharge calculations
542 Water Quantity Control
The Modified Rational Method was used to assess the quantity and volume of runoff generated during post development conditions The site was subdivided into subcatchments (subareas) tributary to storm sewer inlets as defined by the location of catchbasins inlet grates and used in the storm sewer design (see Appendix D) A summary of subareas and runoff coefficients is provided in Appendix D and Drawing SD-1 indicates the stormwater management subcatchments
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Stormwater Management
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 53
543 Allowable Release Rate
Site discharge rates up to the 100-year storm event are to be restricted to the 2-year storm event with a runoff coefficient (lsquoCrsquo value of 060) as outlined below in Table 4
Table 4 Target Release Rate
Rational Method lsquoCrsquo Area (ha) Time of Concentration (min)
QTarget (Ls)
060 0205 10 263
544 Storage Requirements
The site requires quantity control measures to meet the stormwater release criteria Therefore it is proposed to use underground storage in a cistern located in the underground parking Stormwater management calculations are provided in Appendix D
5441 Subsurface Storage
It is proposed to detain stormwater within a 50 m3 cistern below grade with a maximum controlled release rate of 1619 Ls to the gravity service provided The modified rational method was used to determine the peak volume requirement for the cistern Site drainage areas are captured into the building plumbing directed to the cistern for additional control
Table 5 and Table 6 summarize the flow rates and storage from the cistern for the 2 and 100 year events respectively
Table 5 Peak Controlled (Tributary) 2-Year Release Rate
Area ID Area (ha) Runoff lsquoCrsquo Qrelease (Ls) Vstored (m3) ROOF1 TO ROOF8
TRENCH 0181 085 162 99
Table 6 Peak Controlled (Tributary) 100-Year Release Rate
Area ID Area (ha) Runoff lsquoCrsquo Qrelease (Ls) Vstored (m3) ROOF1 TO ROOF8
TRENCH 0181 100 162 500
545 Uncontrolled Area
A portion of the site around the building (see Drawing SD-1) could not be graded to enter the buildingrsquos internal plumbing system and as such it will sheet drain uncontrolled Table 7 and Table 8 summarize the 2 and 100-year uncontrolled release rates from the proposed development
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Stormwater Management
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 54
Table 7 Peak Uncontrolled (Non-tributary) 2-Year Release Rate
Area ID Area (ha) Runoff lsquoCrsquo Tc (min) Qrelease (Ls)
UNC-1 amp UNC-2 0024 068 10 35
Table 8 Peak Uncontrolled (Non-tributary) 100-Year Release Rate
Area ID Area (ha) Runoff lsquoCrsquo Tc (min) Qrelease (Ls)
UNC-1 amp UNC-2 0024 085 10 101
546 Results
Table 9 and Table 10 demonstrate that the proposed stormwater management plan provides adequate attenuation storage to meet the target peak outflow for the site
Table 9 Estimated Discharge from Site (2-Year)
Area Type Qrelease (Ls) Target (Ls)
Controlled Cistern Discharge 162
263 Uncontrolled Sheet Flow 35
Total 197
Table 10 Estimated Discharge From Site (100-Year)
Area Type Qrelease (Ls) Target (Ls)
Controlled Cistern Discharge 162
263 Uncontrolled Sheet Flow 101
Total 263
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Grading and Drainage
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 61
60 GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The proposed re-development site measures approximately 021 ha in area A detailed grading plan (see Drawing GP-1) has been provided to satisfy the stormwater management requirements and to provide sufficient cover over top of the underground parking garage
The subject site maintains emergency overland flow routes to the streets surrounding the site as depicted on Drawings GP-1 and SD-1
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Utilities
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 71
70 UTILITIES
All utilities (Hydro Ottawa Bell Canada Rogers Ottawa and Enbridge Gas) have existing plants in the area The site will be serviced through connection to these existing services Detailed design of the required utility services will be further investigated as part of the composite utility planning process following design circulation
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Erosion Control During Construction
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 81
80 EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION
Erosion and sediment controls must be in place during construction The following recommendations to the contractor will be included in contract documents
1 Implement best management practices to provide appropriate protection of the proposed drainage system and the receiving water course(s)
2 Limit extent of exposed soils at any given time 3 Re-vegetate exposed areas as soon as possible 4 Minimize the area to be cleared and grubbed 5 Protect exposed slopes with plastic or synthetic mulches 6 Provide sediment traps and basins during dewatering 7 Install sediment traps (such as SiltSackreg by Terrafix) between catch basins and frames 8 Plan construction at proper time to avoid flooding 9 Installation of a mud matt to prevent mud and debris from being transported off site 10 Installation of a silt fence to prevent sediment runoff
The contractor will at every rainfall complete inspections and guarantee proper performance The inspection is to include
1 Verification that water is not flowing under silt barriers 2 Clean and change silt traps at catch basins
Refer to Drawing ECDS-1 for the proposed location of silt fences and other erosion control structures
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Geotechnical Investigation and Phase II ESA
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 91
90 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PHASE II ESA
91 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
A geotechnical report for the site was prepared by Paterson Group in July 2019 (see Appendix E) As stated in the geotechnical report the subsurface profile across the site generally consists of fill underlying the existing crushed stone surface or 80 to 150 mm thick asphalt surface The fill material extended to approximate depths of 14 to 38 m below the existing ground surface and generally consisted of loose to dense brown silty sand to silty clay with trace to some gravel cobbles boulders and construction debris such as glass wood chips brick and concrete
Practical refusal to augering or excavation was encountered at the test holes at depths of 14 to 38 m below the existing ground surface Bedrock was cored to depths of 77 to 135 m and consisted of a poor to excellent quality limestone to limestone with interbedded dolostone and shale
Groundwater levels were measured in April 2013 and in May 2019 and were found to range between 53 m and 71 m below ground surface elevation
Bedrock removal will be required to complete the four (4) levels of underground parking The geotechnical report recommended line drilling with hoe-ramming and controlled blasting to remove the bedrock The report also recommended that prior to considering blasting operations the effects on the existing services buildings and other structures should be addressed
An alignment of a large diameter watermain runs along Scott Street It is expected that the adjacent watermain could be subjected to potential vibrations associated with the bedrock blasting program To ensure that no detrimental vibrations cause damage to the adjacent watermain a vibration attenuation trench is recommended for the bedrock along the north excavation face as well as a vibration monitoring and control program during the blasting and excavation work required for the proposed building excavation (please refer to the Geotechnical report included in Appendix E for details)
Given that the proposed building is to have more than 2 underground parking levels the geotechnical report recommended the following water suppression system to manage and control groundwater water infiltration over the long term The water suppression system would be installed for the exterior foundation walls and underfloor drainage and would consist of the following (refer to Figure 4 - Water Suppression System in Appendix 2 of the Geotechnical report included in Appendix E for an illustration of this system cross-section)
bull A concrete mud slab creating a horizontal hydraulic barrier to lessen the water infiltration at the base of the excavation The thickness of the concrete mud slab will be determined during the excavation program when realistic groundwater infiltration can
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Geotechnical Investigation and Phase II ESA
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 92
be properly assessed However for preliminary design purposes it is recommended that the concrete mud slab be designed at a minimum thickness of 150 mm
bull A waterproofing membrane to lessen the effect of water infiltration for the lower underground parking level(s) starting at 6 m below finished grade The waterproofing membrane will consist of a bentonite waterproofing such as Tremco Paraseal or equivalent securely fastened to the temporary shoring system or the vertical bedrock surface The membrane should extend to the bottom of the excavation at the founding level and extend horizontally over the concrete mud slab a minimum of 300 mm prior to the placement of the footings Consideration can be given to doubling the bentonite waterproofing panels within the lower portion of the underground parking levels where hydrostatic pressure will be greater
For foundation drainage the geotechnical report recommended that a composite drainage layer be placed from finished grade to the bottom of the foundation wall Where the proposed building is to have more than 2 underground parking levels and the water suppression system is employed the composite drainage layer should be placed between the waterproofing membrane and the foundation wall
It is recommended that the composite drainage system consist of DeltaDrain 6000 MiraDrain G100N or an approved equivalent It is expected that 150 mm diameter sleeves placed at 3 m centres be cast in the foundation wall at the footing interface to allow the infiltration of water to flow to an interior perimeter drainage pipe The perimeter drainage pipe should direct water to the sump pit(s) within the lower basement area
Underfloor drainage will be required to control water infiltration below the lowest underground parking level slab For design purposes the geotechnical report recommended that 150 mm diameter perforated pipes be placed at approximate 6 m spacing underlying the lowest level floor slab The final spacing of the underfloor drainage system should be confirmed at the time of completing the excavation when water infiltration can be better assessed
The contractor should be prepared to direct water away from all bearing surfaces and subgrades regardless of the source to prevent disturbance to the founding medium Infiltration levels are anticipated to be low through the excavation face The groundwater infiltration will be controllable with open sumps and pumps A temporary MECP permit to take water (PTTW) may be required for this project if more than 400000 Lday of ground andor surface water are to be pumped during the construction phase A minimum of four to five months should be allocated for completion of the application and issuance of the permit by the MECP
The geotechnical report recommended that any groundwater encountered along the buildingrsquos perimeter or sub-slab drainage system be directed to the proposed buildingrsquos cisternsump pit Due to the limited capacity of the existing sewers it is anticipated that pumped groundwater can be temporarily contained within a cisternholding tank to permit reduced discharge volumes if required Provided the proposed groundwater infiltration control system is
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Geotechnical Investigation and Phase II ESA
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 93
properly implemented where more than 3 underground parking levels are built it is expected that groundwater flow will be low (ie- less than 3000 Lday) with peak periods noted after rain events It is anticipated that the groundwater flow will be controllable using conventional open sumps
92 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
A Phase II ESA was conducted by Paterson Group in September 2019 (see report in Appendix E) The purpose of the Phase II ESA was to address the potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) that were identified during the Phase I ESA and considered to result in areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) on the subject property
Four (4) soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of benzene toluene ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs F1-F4) metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Several metals parameters in the vicinity of BH6-19 exceeded the selected MECP Table 7 standards The impacted fill material was identified in the southeast portion of the subject property where the former automotive service garage was located The extent of the impacted fill material is considered to be limited to the fill material present on the eastern portion of the property
Groundwater samples recovered from monitoring wells installed in BH1MW1 BH4-19 BH5-19 and BH6-19 were submitted for analysis of BTEX PHCs (F1-F4) PAHs and metals parameters The concentration of benzene in the sample recovered from BH1MW1 was marginally in excess of the selected MECP Table 7 standards The impacted groundwater was identified in the southwest portion of the subject property only where the tank nest associated with the former retail fuel outlet was located The extent of the impacted groundwater is considered to be limited to a small radius within the southwest portion of the property
Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA metal and PAH impacted fill material as well as benzene impacted groundwater is present on the subject property requiring some remedial work
921 Environmental Remedial Action Plan
An Environmental Remedial Action Plan was subsequently prepared by Paterson Group in April 2020 (see Appendix E) The suggested remedial action plan would consist of the excavation and disposal of impacted soil at an approved waste disposal facility The following assumptions were used in Patersonrsquos Environmental Remedial Action Plan
bull The remediation of the site will occur in conjunction with the re-development of the property It is anticipated that all of the soil on the eastern portion of the site is impacted
bull The soil quality at the subject site has not been fully delineated at this time Based on the available soil results the soil on the eastern half of the property is considered to be impacted and will be removed as such
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Geotechnical Investigation and Phase II ESA
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 94
bull Excavated soil will be screened using visual and olfactory observations in conjunction with analytical testing Impacted soil will be placed in trucks and hauled to an approved waste disposal facility
bull If impacted groundwater is confirmed to be present on site a portable treatment system will be installed to treat on-site accumulated groundwater by means of granular activated carbon Alternatively impacted groundwater could be removed by a licensed pumping contractor for off-site disposal Groundwater treatment will continue until the on-site groundwater concentrations are in compliance with the MECP Table 7 Standards andor the City of Ottawa sewer use by-law
bull A Sanitary Sewer Agreement will be obtained from the City of Ottawa Sewer Use Program prior to discharging any groundwater to the municipal system Testing reporting and discharge requirements will be carried out in compliance with the agreement
bull It is expected that two quarterly post remediation confirmatory groundwater testing events will be required
bull A summary report and RSC will be submitted to the MECP for acknowledgement
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Conclusions
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 101
100 CONCLUSIONS
101 WATER SERVICING
The 200 mm diameter watermain on Scott Street and the 150 mm diameter watermain on Winona Avenue provide adequate fire flow capacity as per the Fire Underwriters Survey In order to meet the City water supply objective that limits a single feed to 50 m3d during basic day demands three connections are required to service the proposed building two connections to the existing 200 mm diameter watermain on Scott Street and one connection to the 150 mm diameter watermain on Winona Avenue The service connection will be capable of providing anticipated demands to the lower storeys but will require a booster pump to maintain minimum pressures of 350 kPa (50 psi) for floors 6 to 23
102 SANITARY SERVICING
The proposed sanitary sewer lateral is sufficiently sized to provide gravity drainage for the site The proposed site will be serviced by a 150 mm diameter service lateral directing wastewater flows to the existing 225 mm diameter sanitary sewer on Winona Avenue A backflow preventer will be required for the proposed building in accordance with the Ottawa sewer design guide and will be coordinated with building mechanical engineers
103 STORMWATER SERVICING
The proposed stormwater management plan is in compliance with the goals specified through consultation with the City of Ottawa as well as local standards Underground storage will be provided within a cistern located in the underground parking Post development peak flows from the overall site up to the 100-year storm will be restricted to the target release rate An underground pump will be required to direct flows from the internal building drainage system to the proposed gravity service connected to the existing 675 mm diameter storm sewer running north on Winona Avenue and ultimately discharging into the Scott Street storm sewer
104 GRADING
Erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented during construction to reduce the impact on existing infrastructure An alignment of a large diameter watermain runs within Scott Street along the northern property line It is expected that the adjacent watermain could be subjected to potential vibrations associated with the bedrock blasting program To ensure that no detrimental vibrations cause damage to the adjacent watermain a vibration attenuation trench is recommended for the bedrock along the north excavation face as well as a vibration monitoring and control program during the blasting and excavation work required for the proposed building excavation
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Conclusions
pa wactive1 planning_landscape1604 projects160410249designreportservicing2nd submission - may 2020serv-swm_2nd-submission_2020-05-29_ampdocx 102
105 UTILITIES
All utilities (Hydro Ottawa Bell Canada Rogers Ottawa and Enbridge Gas) have existing plants in the subject area Exact size location and routing of utilities will be finalized after design circulation
106 APPROVAL PERMITS
Ministry of the Environment Conservation and Parks (MECP) Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) are not expected to be required for the subject site as the site is private and will remain under singular ownership A Permit to Take Water may be required for pumping requirements for construction of underground parking level No other approval requirements from other regulatory agencies are anticipated
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
APPENDICES
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Appendix A Water Calculations
A1
Appendix A WATER CALCULATIONS
From Wu JohnTo Odam CameronSubject RE 2090 Scott Street - Hydraulic Boundary Conditions RequestDate Friday September 06 2019 101559 AMAttachments 2070 Scott Option 1 Sept 2019pdf
2070 Scott Option 2 Sept 2019pdf
Here is the resultThe following are boundary conditions HGL for hydraulic analysis at 2070 Scott (zone 1W)assumed to be connected to
Option 1 203mm on Scott (Connection 1) and 406mm on Churchill (Connection 2)
Option 2 203mm on Scott (Connection 1) and 152mm on Winona (Connection 2)
Option 1
Connection 1
(Scott)
Connection 2
(Churchill)
Min HGL 1087m 1087m
Max HGL 1150m 1150m
Max day + FireFlow (100 Ls) 1090m 1100m
Option 2
Connection 1
(Scott)
Connection 2
(Winona)
Min HGL 1087m 1087m
Max HGL 1150m 1150m
Max day + FireFlow (100 Ls) 1090m 950m
These are for current conditions and are based on computer model simulation
Disclaimer The boundary condition information is based on current operation of the city waterdistribution system The computer model simulation is based on the best information availableat the time The operation of the water distribution system can change on a regular basisresulting in a variation in boundary conditions The physical properties of watermainsdeteriorate over time as such must be assumed in the absence of actual field test data Thevariation in physical watermain properties can therefore alter the results of the computermodel simulation
John
GF
GF
1220mm
406mm
203mm
152mm102mm
305mm
203mm
152mm
102mm
203mm
203mm
305mm
305m
m
2
1997
323
2120
2070
293
2100
334
338
329
333
346
322
339
2050
326
330
330
337
301
2046
305
332
329
328
309
334
299
336
349348
307
353
2091
347 350357
295
300
328
322
SCOTT ST
WINONA AVE
CHURCHILL AVE N
TRANSITWAY
ASHTON AVE
WORKMAN AVE
$Boundary Condition for 2070 Scott - Option 1
LegendPipe OwnershipOwnership
PrivatePublic
GF GF
1220mm
406mm
203mm
152mm102mm
305mm
203mm
152mm
102mm
203mm
203mm
305mm
305m
m
2
1997
323
2120
2070
293
2100
334
338
329
333
346
322
339
2050
326
330
330
337
301
2046
305
332
329
328
309
334
299
336
349348
307
353
2091
347 350357
295
300
328
322
SCOTT ST
WINONA AVE
CHURCHILL AVE N
TRANSITWAY
ASHTON AVE
WORKMAN AVE
$Boundary Condition for 2070 Scott - Option 2
LegendPipe OwnershipOwnership
PrivatePublic
CAUTION This email originated from an External Sender Please do not click links or open attachmentsunless you recognize the source
ATTENTION Ce courriel provient drsquoun expeacutediteur externe Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et nrsquoouvrez pasde piegravece jointe excepteacute si vous connaissez lrsquoexpeacutediteur
CAUTION This email originated from an External Sender Please do not click links or open attachmentsunless you recognize the source
ATTENTION Ce courriel provient drsquoun expeacutediteur externe Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et nrsquoouvrez pasde piegravece jointe excepteacute si vous connaissez lrsquoexpeacutediteur
From Odam Cameron ltCameronOdamstanteccomgt Sent September 4 2019 224 PMTo Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagtCc Paerez Ana ltAnaPaerezstanteccomgt Kilborn Kris ltkriskilbornstanteccomgtSubject RE 2090 Scott Street - Hydraulic Boundary Conditions Request
John Thanks for pointing that out As per page 17 of the FUS guidelines based on the proposed building beingfire resistant with adequate protection of the vertical openings we have now adjusted the area to beequal to the largest floor area (floor 1) with the addition of 25 of the two nearest adjoining floor areasfloor 2 and floor 3 (floor 3 was taken given the basement floors are not to be considered) Best Cameron
From Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagt Sent Wednesday September 04 2019 132 PMTo Odam Cameron ltCameronOdamstanteccomgtSubject RE 2090 Scott Street - Hydraulic Boundary Conditions Request Yoursquore A is not right either use the total area including all areas or for fire resistantbuilding at least is one floor adding 50 of itrsquos top and 50 of its under therefore itis at least of 2 of ground floor please read the page 17 in FUS method John From Odam Cameron ltCameronOdamstanteccomgt Sent September 4 2019 126 PMTo Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagtCc Kilborn Kris ltkriskilbornstanteccomgt Paerez Ana ltAnaPaerezstanteccomgtSubject RE 2090 Scott Street - Hydraulic Boundary Conditions Request
Hi John
CAUTION This email originated from an External Sender Please do not click links or open attachmentsunless you recognize the source
ATTENTION Ce courriel provient drsquoun expeacutediteur externe Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et nrsquoouvrez pasde piegravece jointe excepteacute si vous connaissez lrsquoexpeacutediteur
As per your request I have attached the FUS calculation sheet that indicates a fire flow of 4 000 Lmin(667 Ls) Please let me know if there is any further information you require at any point Best Cameron
From Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagt Sent Wednesday September 04 2019 1057 AMTo Odam Cameron ltCameronOdamstanteccomgtSubject RE 2090 Scott Street - Hydraulic Boundary Conditions Request Please use FUS method for fire flow calculation John From Odam Cameron ltCameronOdamstanteccomgt Sent September 4 2019 1030 AMTo Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagtCc Kilborn Kris ltkriskilbornstanteccomgtSubject 2090 Scott Street - Hydraulic Boundary Conditions Request
Hi John Would you be able to provide me with watermain hydraulic boundary conditions for theproposed site located at 2090 Scott Street The site consists of a proposed 23 storey mixed usebuilding over a 3 storey underground parking lot The water service connection location to thebuilding has yet to be finalized but will tie into either the existing 400mm watermain on ChurchillAvenue the 200mm on Scott Street or the 150mm WM on Winona Avenue (within the right ofway adjacent to the site) It is still in discussion with the architect as to which 2 of the 3 locations will be the confirmedconnection points However if you can provide all three that would be appreciated We have attached the OBC fire flow calculations for the proposed building as there is no privatewatermain required on site and will use existing municipal hydrants A site location map with theapproximate proposed connection point is also attached Estimated domestic demands and fire flow requirements for the site are as followsAverage Day Demand ndash 177 LsMax Day Demand - 441 LsPeak Hour Demand - 970 Ls
Fire Flow Requirement per OBC ndash150 Ls (9 000 Lmin) Thanks Cameron Cameron Odam
Direct +16137244353Fax +16137222799CameronOdamstanteccom
Stantec400 - 1331 Clyde AvenueOttawa ON K2C 3G4
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied modified retransmitted or used for any purpose except with Stantecs writtenauthorization If you are not the intended recipient please delete all copies and notify us immediately
This e-mail originates from the City of Ottawa e-mail system Any distribution use or copyingof this e-mail or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient(s) isunauthorized Thank you
Le preacutesent courriel a eacuteteacute expeacutedieacute par le systegraveme de courriels de la Ville dOttawa Toutedistribution utilisation ou reproduction du courriel ou des renseignements qui sy trouvent parune personne autre que son destinataire preacutevu est interdite Je vous remercie de votrecollaboration
This e-mail originates from the City of Ottawa e-mail system Any distribution use or copyingof this e-mail or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient(s) isunauthorized Thank you
Le preacutesent courriel a eacuteteacute expeacutedieacute par le systegraveme de courriels de la Ville dOttawa Toutedistribution utilisation ou reproduction du courriel ou des renseignements qui sy trouvent parune personne autre que son destinataire preacutevu est interdite Je vous remercie de votrecollaboration
This e-mail originates from the City of Ottawa e-mail system Any distribution use or copyingof this e-mail or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient(s) isunauthorized Thank you
Le preacutesent courriel a eacuteteacute expeacutedieacute par le systegraveme de courriels de la Ville dOttawa Toutedistribution utilisation ou reproduction du courriel ou des renseignements qui sy trouvent parune personne autre que son destinataire preacutevu est interdite Je vous remercie de votrecollaboration
GF GF
1220mm
406mm
203mm
152mm102mm
305mm
203mm
152mm
102mm
203mm
203mm
305mm
305m
m
2
1997
323
2120
2070
293
2100
334
338
329
333
346
322
339
2050
326
330
330
337
301
2046
305
332
329
328
309
334
299
336
349348
307
353
2091
347 350357
295
300
328
322
SCOTT ST
WINONA AVE
CHURCHILL AVE N
TRANSITWAY
ASHTON AVE
WORKMAN AVE
$Boundary Condition for 2070 Scott - Option 2
LegendPipe OwnershipOwnership
PrivatePublic
2090 Scott Street - Domestic Water Demand Estimates14 ppu21 ppu31 ppu27 ppu
350 Lcd28 000 Lha-day
(Lmin) (Ls) (Lmin) (Ls) (Lmin) (Ls)
Commercial 509 - 28 10 002 15 002 27 004Residential - 418 350 1015 169 2539 423 5585 931
Total Site 1025 171 2554 426 5612 935
12
1
2
Water demand criteria used to estimate peak demand rates for commercial areas are as follows maximum day demand rate = 15 x average day demand rate
peak hour demand rate = 18 x maximum day demand rate
Water demand criteria used to estimate peak demand rates for residential areas are as follows maximum day demand rate = 25 x average day demand rate peak hour demand rate = 22 x maximum day demand rate
For the purpose of this study it is predicted that retail and office facilities will be operated 12 hours per day
Max Day Demand 1 Peak Hour Demand 2Building ID Area (m2)
Daily Rate of Demand
Avg Day Demand Population
Commercial
Population densities as per City Guidelines
Demand conversion factors as per City Guidelines
1 Bedroom Apt2 Bedroom Apt3 Bedroom Apt
Townhouse
Residential
CA0218-PPFSS01work_group01-604active1 planning_landscape1604 Projects160410249designanalysiswtrSecond Submission2020-05-26_Demandsxlsx Demands 5272020
Notes
Step Task Value Used Reqd Fire Flow (Lmin)
1 Determine Type of Construction 08 -
Determine Ground Floor Area of One Unit 2084 -
Determine Number of Adjoining Units 1 -
3 Determine Height in Storeys 1 -
4 Determine Required Fire Flow - 8000
5 Determine Occupancy Charge -15 6800
-30
-10
0
100
Direction Exposure Distance (m)
Exposed Length (m)
Exposed Height (Stories)
Length-Height Factor (m x
stories)Construction of Adjacent Wall - -
North gt 45 481 3 gt 120 Wood Frame or Non-Combustible 0
East 201 to 30 278 4 91-120 Ordinary or Fire-Resistive with Unprotected Openings 9
South 31 to 10 564 2 91-120 Wood Frame or Non-Combustible 20
West 201 to 30 28 2 31-60 Wood Frame or Non-Combustible 8
7000
1167
200
840
7 Determine Increase for Exposures (Max 75)2516
8 Determine Final Required Fire Flow
Total Required Fire Flow in Lmin Rounded to Nearest 1000Lmin
Total Required Fire Flow in Ls
Required Duration of Fire Flow (hrs)
Required Volume of Fire Flow (m3)
6 Determine Sprinkler Reduction
Conforms to NFPA 13
-2720Standard Water Supply
Not Fully Supervised or NA
Coverage of Sprinkler System
2-
-
Does not include floors gt50 below grade or open attic space
Limited Combustible
(F = 220 x C x A12) Round to nearest 1000 Lmin
Notes
Non-Combustible Construction
Date 5272020
FUS Fire Flow Calculation Sheet
Stantec Project 160410249Project Name 2070 Scott Street
Fire Flow Calculation 2Description Mixed Use Apartment Building
Floor assembly to be 2hour fire seperation as per OBC 32242
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Appendix B Proposed Site Plan
B1
Appendix B PROPOSED SITE PLAN
AN
Top of Wall = 6577
LOT 18LOT 14
3 7
A V
E N
U E
S C O T T S T R E E T
p a r t 1
PIN 04020 - 0018
PIN 04020 - 0217
)
PIN
0
4020
-
012
1
( ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN CONCESSIONS A AND 1 )
PIN 04019 - 0135
( FO
RM
ERLY
BIR
CH
S
TREE
T )
PIN 04020 - 0021
part 2 PLAN 4R-18177
PIN 04020 - 0216
PIN 04020 - 0214 part 1 PLAN 4R-18177
PART 4 PLAN 5R-9914
E BENCHMARKP OF SPINDLEEV = 6618
N 58` 18 40 E 6035
341
5
N 57` 28 00 E 6046
201
5
201
27
92
332
4
N
23
`
42
50
W
3`
4
4
5
0
W
( R
efer
ence
Bear
ing
)
2 StoreyBrick amp Concrete Block
2nd Storey (With drive through below)Brick amp Concrete Block
Brick amp Concrete Block Building2 STOREY
No 329
43
45
W
20
13
3023 meas
Asphalt Drive
789
Botto
m
Fac
e
Con
cret
e
Cur
b N
oted
UP
Botto
m
Fac
e
Con
cret
e
Cur
b N
oted
UP
Woo
den
Cur
b E
ast
Face
Not
ed
BF
No 328
Ove
rhea
d
Wire
s
Meas (P1) amp Meas
(AO
G) amp
Set
(
341
4 P1
)
Meas (6035 P1)
IB
(P1)
amp M
eas
(857
) amp S
et
(33
22
P1)
(AO
G) amp
Mea
s
388
166
026
Wes
tC
urb
Cur
b0
09 W
est
SSIB
045
Sou
t h(8
5 7)
amp M
eas
054 SouthSouth Face BF
Build
ing
07 5
Sou
t h
Bui ld
ing
IB
Asphalt
(BRICK NOTED)
408
Edge of Asphalt
598
601
Viny
l Sid
ed G
arag
e
h C
LF o
n c
entre
line
of W
all
(AO
G) amp
Set
(2
012
Pla
n)
(3018 P1)
Building Corner002 South 004 South
Building Corner
rete
Sid
ewal
k
Air Conditioner
SSIB(1287)
cret
e
R
etai
ning
Wal
l
Botto
m F
ace
Con
cret
e C
urb
Not
ed
(20
12 P
1)
concretewall067 N
conceretewall013 south
326
38 2
33 3
limit of second storey
tore
y ov
erha
ng
IB(AOG)
SSIB(AOG)
227
300
279
7
571
SSIB(AOG)
300
227
288
8
142
CP (1287)
Bottom Face Concrete Curb Noted
Stairs
6331
6569
6396
6382
Top of Wall = 6580
657165746570
6559
6413
6416
6441
65696546
6428
6405
1022PORCH
1023PORCH
MHTG=
MHTG= MHTG=
504CB
505CB
506CB
509CB
519CB
649CB
523CBI
1012CB
1015CB
1017CB
1018CB 902CB
903CB
902CB
903CB
102FL-BF
104FL-BF147FL-BF
148FL-BF
197BO
198BO
67FL-BF65FL-BF
66FL-BF
538EV-A
539EV-A
544EV-A
545EV-A
EV-A
549EV-A
550EV-A
551EV-A552EV-A
553EV-A
554EV-A
555EV-A
556EV-A
557EV-A
560EV-G
561EV-G
562EV-G 563EV-A
570EV-G571EV-G
581EV-G
582EV-G
583EV-G584EV-G
585EV-G
586EV-G
587EV-G
588EV-G
589EV-G
590EV-A
591EV-A
592EV-A
593EV-A
598EV-A
606EV-A
57EV-G 58EV-G
59EV-G
60EV-G
61EV-G
62EV-G
63EV-G
217EV-G
218EV-G
219EV
220EV
221EV
222EV
223EV
1003EV-A
1005EV-A1006EV-A
1008EV
1009EV
1010EV
1026Finish Floor Elevation
1027EV-A
1028EV-A
207CO
656IS 657IS
658IS
659IS660IS
661IS662IS
663IS
664IS
665IS 666IS
667IS668IS
669IS670IS
671IS
672IS673IS
674IS675IS
676IS677IS
678IS679IS
680IS681IS
682IS
683IS
684IS
685IS
686IS
687IS
688IS
689IS
690AO
691AO
692AO
694AO
698AO
699AO
157AO
158AO
180AO
181AO
182AO
183AO
184AO 185AO 186AO 187AO
205CO 206CO
208CO
213IS
214IS215IS
IS
101UP
210UP
209AN
500MH-ST501WV
502MH-S
507WV
508MH
510MH-ST
511MH-ST
515MH-ST
524HH
525MH-T
526MH-H
527VC
528MH
529MH-S
531MH-S
532MH-S
533WV
534WV
535MH-S
117UP
116FH
211LS
212FH
244LS
252OHW
253OHW
254OHW
255OHW
518MH-ST
1013MH
907WV
908UG
909UG
910MH-ST911UH 9U
913UH
914UH
915UG
916UG
917UG
918UG
923WV
907WV
908UG
909UG
910MH-ST911UH 9U
913UH
914UH
915UG
916UG
917UG
918UG
923WV
166HR
164HR
199A-SGN200A-SGN
231HR
201A-SGN
202A-SGN
203A-SGN
572RWC573RWC
574RWC
575RWC576RWC577RWC
607CU
608SWC
609SWC
610SWC
611SWC612SWC
613SWC614SWC
615SWC616SWC 617SWC
618SWC619SWC
620CU
621CU
622CU
623CU
624CU
625CU
626CU
627CU
628CU
629CU630CU
631CU632CU
633CU634CU635CU
636CU637CU
638CU
639CU
640CU
641CU
642CU
643CU
644CU
645CU
647CU
648CU
650CU
651CU
652CU
653CU
204A-SGN
124CU
125CU
155A-SGN
156A-SGN
1007SWC
1011CU
1014CU
1016CU
1019CU
1020CU
1024STC
1025STC
904CU
905CU
904CU
905CU
118CR
119CR
120CR
121CR
122CR
123CR
C127CR
128CR129CR
130CR131CR
132CR133CR
134CR234CR
235CR
236CR
237CR
238CR
9
5006CR5001CR
6310
6317
6319
6304
6273
6321
6330
6336
6359
6349
6355
6494
6552
6540
6535
6524
6527
6536
6544
6366
6535
6535
6490
6500
6536
6535
64516422
6462
6538
6618
6555
6543
6541
6565
6539
7326
7325
6357
6335
6318
6304
6268
-93620 6369
6370
6309
6310
6270
6333
6356
6333
6335
6357
63536353
6360
63416352
63736377
6539
6270
6333
6356
6333
6335
6357
63536353
6360
63416352
63736377
6539
LS
LS
16529
MAG
26400
MAG
36370
MAG
46545
MAG
1gps6530
MAG
3gps6369
MAG
149BDG-F
178BDG-B
251BDG-B
179BDG-B
229BDG-F
5004
5009BDG-E
5011BDG-E
5012
1021BDG-F
BDG-FUP
UP
MH-HTG=UP
zrstzrstrst
finished floor
roof peak
finished floor
finished floor
HH
MH-TTG=
MH-STTG=
MH-STTG=
MH-STTG=
MH-ST
MH-STTG=
MH-STTG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
WV
WV
VCTG=
WV
WV
FH
FH
WV
WV
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S6394 6387
6358
6362
6303
6305
6300
6293
6295
6302
6309
6326
6349
6323
6309
64106398
6352
6350
64296427
6425
64176418
6424
6446
6481
6501
6517
6520
6530
6539
6535
6548
6553
6563
6573
6515
6477
6508
6271
65146503
6494 6488 6457 6425 6401 6382 63776363
6362 6354
6273
6280
6284
6299
6316
6330
6337
6347
63546357636663866408643464606476
6490
6503
6514
6525
6528
6524
6523
6527
6538
6537
6540
6536
6537
6536
6540
6542
65486557
6566
6558656065566558
65566549
65456548
6546654565476546
6538
65386536
65346536
65386537
6533 6531
65276528
6520
65066505
6513
6511
6508 6504
6512
6484
6487
6498
6505
6517
651865376537
6538
6418
63656354
6354
6411
6376
6373
6337
6324
6307
6289
6281
6281
6285
6325
6365637063826398
6418644564756511
6458
6478
6513
6515
65116515
6516
65546547
65466545
65436545
6549
6530
65386525
6525
6519
6565
6522
6568 6558
6556
6383
6544
6538
6537
6542
6548
52
6499 6368
7008
63776377
6513
656865666577
6381
6406
6369
6306
6359
6329
6319
6272
6269
6390
6294
6288
6339
6349
6339
6349
TG
=C
B
TG=
CB
TG=
CB
TG
=C
B
TG=CB
CBI
TG=
TG=CB
TG
=C
B
TG
=C
B
TG=
CB
TG=
CB
B
B
53CP
50IB
51IB
52SIB
70
71 72
73
76
77
78
79 80
81
82
5455
56
167167
6
PROPERTY LINE
MAIN BUILDING ENTRANCE
LINE OF UNDER GROUND GARAGE BELOW
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONFFE
BUILDING ENVELOPE
00000TOP OF ROOF
RETAIL ENTRANCE
EXIT
VEHICLE ENTRANCE EXIT
FIRE HYDRANT
SIAMESE CONNECTION
MANHOLE COVER
SITE PLAN LEGEND
A B C D E F G H I J K
1
2
3
4
6
7
10
9
8
5
SCOTT STREET
WIN
ON
A AV
ENU
E
CH
UR
CH
ILL
AVEN
UE
2ND FLOOR ROOF TOP
EXITRESIDENTIAL ENTRANCERETAIL
ENTRANCE
RETAIL ENTRANCE
RETAIL ENTRANCE
PRIV
ATE
TER
RAC
ES
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING BUS SHELTER
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
EXIT
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
UNDERGROUND PARKING ENTRANCE
AIR INTAKE
AIR
EXHA
UST
3377
3500
2970
5200
4050
9200
CURB CUT AS PER CITY OF OTTOWA DETAIL SC71
N 58deg 18 10 E5434
N 72deg 41 30 W
394
N 17deg 16 3
0 E
452
N 23
deg 45
20 W
N 57deg 27 30 E
RETAINING WALL PLANTER
RETAIL BIKE PARKING
1900
0
RESIDENTIAL TERRACES AT 4TH
FLOOR
BICYCLE PARKING ENTRANCE
N 23
deg 43
30 W
2797
ROAD CUT AS PER CITY OF OTTOWA STANDARD DETAIL R10
RETAINING WALL PLANTER
43590TO SIAMESE CONNECTION
7600
15000
OUTDOOR AMENITY ROOF AT 6TH FLOOR
2070 SCOTT STREET25 STOREYS + MPH
MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL
SITE AREA 20903 SQMGROSS FLOOR AREA 16977 SQM
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
TERRACES AT 6TH FLOOR
1925
5
FIRE ROUTE
374m
TO FI
RE HYDRANT
UTILITY POLE
UTILITY POLE
10138
5625
10040
2897
N 57deg 27 10 E
7002
RESIDENTIAL TERRACES AT 3RD
FLOOR
2249
3023
N 23
deg 52
20 E
792
3023
2888
IRON FENCE
EXISTING HYDRO POLE
9056
9200
9500
500
05m RETAINING WALL
2500
1207
4
1348
8
1500
Quadrangle
Quadrangle Architects Limited901 King Street West Suite 701 Toronto ON M5V 3H5t 416 598 1240 wwwquadrangleca
P R O J E C T S C A L E D R A W N R E V I E W E D
I S S U E R E C O R D
R E V I S I O N R E C O R D
Note This drawing is the property of the Architect and may not be reproduced orused without the expressed consent of the Architect The Contractor is responsible for checking and verifying all levels and dimensions and shall report alldiscrepancies to the Architect and obtain clarification prior to commencing work
DW
G 1
8058
D07
-12-
19-0
167
2020
-05-
25 2
30
16 P
M
As indicated
CU
sers
jgra
ntD
ocum
ents
QAL
_AR_
1902
3_20
90 S
cott
Stre
et_R
2020
_jgr
antD
CKLJ
rvt
2070 Scott Street
Ottawa ON
Site Plan
Azure Urban Developments Inc
19023 DLC
A101S
LS
Date No Description
2019-10-03 Rezoning and Site Plan ApprovalSubmission
PARKING LEGEND
PARKING SPACEC=COMMERCIAL PARKINGR=RESIDENTIAL PARKINGV=VISITOR PARKING
PARKING NOTES
1 MINIMUM PARKING SPACE SIZES (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 2600mm WIDE X 5600mm LONG (NO SIDES OBSTRUCTED) 2900mm WIDE X 5600mm LONG (ONE SIDE OBSTRUCTED) 3200mm WIDE X 5600mm LONG (TWO SIDES OBSTRUCTED)
2 MAINTAIN MININUM DRIVE AISLE WIDTH OF 6000mm UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED3 MAINTAIN MINIMUM HEADROOM CLEARANCE OF 2100mm THROUGHOUT
2900
5600
2600
5600
TYPICAL ONE SIDE OBSTRUCTRED
C
2400 1500
5600
ACCESSIBLE
V 01
V 02
V 05
V 06
AIR INTAKE
A B C D E F G H I J K
1
2
3
4
6
7
10
9
8
5
V 09V 08V 07 V 10 V 12 V 13 V 14 V 15 V 16 V 17 V 18
C 07
75
V 11 STORMWATERCISTERN
V 03
V 04
500 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 1952
2600
2600
2600
2600 3900 5600
2600
2600
2600
026
0026
00
PUMP ROOM
35 m3
2600
2600
500
15RAMP UP TO GROUND FLOOR
AIR EXHAUST
V 22
EXISTING WATERMAIN CONNECTION
SANITARY CONNECTION
STORM WATER CONNECTION
WATER MAIN CONNECTION
5
3185
5600
6000
6000
6000
5600
STORAGE LOCKERS
LINE
OF M
EZZA
NINE
ABO
VE
DN
ELEVATOR LOBBY
V 23
V 24
V 25
V 26
V 27
C 06 C 05 C 04 C 03 C 02 C 012600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600
V 20V 19
DN
2600 2600 2600 2600
RESIDENTIAL PARKING GATEFROM P1-P2
6000
V 21
5
TURN AROUND SPACE
R 34
R 24R 23R 22 R 25
R 16
R 17
R 18
R 19
R 20
R 21
R 26 R 27 R 28 R 29 R 30 R 31 R 32 R 39
R 36R 35 R 38R 37
R 41
R 40
R 05
R 42
R 45
R 44
R 03R 04R 05R 06R 07R 08R 09R 10R 11R 12R 13R 14R 15
AIR INTAKE
A B C D E F G H I J K
1
2
3
4
6
7
10
9
8
5
AIR EXHAUST
R 46R 47R 01R 02
500 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600
2600
2600
2600
2600
500
2600
2600
2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600
5600
6585
5600
6000
5600
300 2600 1100
2600 26003306 2600
3900 750
2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 0
2600
2600
2600
2600
2600
2600
650
MECHANICAL ROOM
STORAGE LOCKERS
DN
60005600
ELEVATOR LOBBY
RESIDENTIAL PARKING RAMPFROM P1-P2 amp
P2-P3
DNTO P35
2600 2600 300
R 33
A B C D E F G H I J K
1
2
3
4
6
7
10
9
8
5R 129
AIR INTAKE
2600 2600
DN
ELEVATOR LOBBY
R 137
R 136
R 139
R 138
R 140
R 125 R 126 R 134
R 133
R 124
R 132R 131R 130
R 123R 122R 121R 120R 119R 118R 117R 116
R 112
R 113
R 114
R 115
R 110
R 1112600
2600
2600
2600
2600
2600
R 104R 105R 106R 107R 109 R 103
2600
STORAGE LOCKERS
AIR EXHAUST
R 108
2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 26002600 2600
2600
2600
2600
2600
2600
2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600
6000
6000
R 144R 145R 97R 98R 99R 100R 101R 102
2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600 2600
5RESIDENTIAL PARKING RAMPFROM P3-P4
R 127
R 128
R 143 R 142
R 141
R 135
SPOT R95 amp R96
ABOVE
5
2600 2600
2600
END OF P4
A B C D E F G H I J K
1
2
3
4
6
7
10
9
8
5
BICYCLE LOCKER ROOM (194 LOCKERS)231 msup22482 ftsup2
STAIR B
AIR INTAKE
AIR EXHAUST
DN
UP
Quadrangle
Quadrangle Architects Limited901 King Street West Suite 701 Toronto ON M5V 3H5t 416 598 1240 wwwquadrangleca
P R O J E C T S C A L E D R A W N R E V I E W E D
I S S U E R E C O R D
R E V I S I O N R E C O R D
Note This drawing is the property of the Architect and may not be reproduced orused without the expressed consent of the Architect The Contractor is responsible for checking and verifying all levels and dimensions and shall report alldiscrepancies to the Architect and obtain clarification prior to commencing work
DW
G 1
8058
D07
-12-
19-0
167
2020
-05-
25 2
30
19 P
M
As indicated
CU
sers
jgra
ntD
ocum
ents
QAL
_AR_
1902
3_20
90 S
cott
Stre
et_R
2020
_jgr
antD
CKLJ
rvt
2070 Scott Street
Ottawa ON
Below Grade Floor Plans
Azure Urban Developments Inc
19023 DLC
A102S
LS
A102SP1 Underground Parking Garage Plan1
A102SP2 amp P3 Underground Parking Garage Plan2
A102SP4 Underground Parking Garage Plan4
A102SMEZZANINE3
Date No Description
2019-10-03 Rezoning and Site Plan ApprovalSubmission
UP
Top of Wall = 6577
SITE BENCHMARKTOP OF SPINDLEELEV = 6618
N 58` 18 40 E 6035
82`0130
341
5
N 57` 28 00 E 6046
792
332
4
4
2
5
0
W
50
W
( R
efer
ence
Bear
ing
)
2 StoreyBrick amp Concrete Block
2nd Storey (With drive through below)Brick amp Concrete Block
201
3
3023 meas
Asphalt Drive
789
3023 meas
6331
6357 6319 6312
6569
6396
6382
Top of Wall = 6580
657165746570
6559
6413
6416
6441
65696546
6428
1022PORCH
1023PORCH
MHTG=
MHTG= MHTG=
100
102FL-BF106FL-BF105
104FL-BF
109
107FL-BF108FL-BF
138FL-BF
147FL-BF148FL-BF
139FL-BF
197BO
198BO
67FL-BF65FL-BF
66FL-BF
118CR
119CR
120CR
121CR
122CR
127CR128CR
129CR130CR
131CR132CR
133CR134CR234CR
235CR
236CR
237CR
238CR
239CR
5006CR5001CR
LS
LS
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
MH-STG=
GM
6341
6341
6394 6387
6330
6323
6325
6323
6358
6362
6327
6316
6308
6303
6305
6300
6293
6295
6302
6309
6326
6349
6306
6313
6323
6309
64106398
63726365
6319
6310
6316
6349
6352
6350
64296427
6425
64176418
6424
6504
6515
6446
6481
6501
6517
6520
6530
6539
6535
6548
6553
6563
6515
6509
6506
6503
6504
6477
6503
65076505
6507
6502
6510
6489
6508
6271
65146503
6494 6488 6457 6425 6401 6382 63776363
6362 6354
6273
6280
6284
6299
6316
6330
6337
6347
63546357636663866408643464606476
6490
6503
6514
6525
6528
6524
6523
6527
6538
6537
6540
6536
6537
6536
6540
65486557
6566
6558656065566558
65566549
65456548
6546654565476546
6538
65386536
65346536
65386537
6533 6531
65276528
6520
65066505
6513
6511
65086504
6512
6484
6487
6498
65036505
6513
6515
6510
6517
651865376537
6538
6418
63656354
6354
6411
6376
6337
6324
6307
6289
6281
6285
6325
6365637063826398
6418644564756511
6418 6374
6492
6508
6458
6478
6501
65216513
6513
6515
65116515
6516
65546547
65466545
6513
6509
6525
6512
6522
65236505
65436545
6549
6530
65386525
6525
6519
6565
6522
6568 6558
6556
6383
6544
6538
6537
6542
6548
6552
6536
6499 6368
6339
6330
6376
7625
7008
6292
6335
6251
63776377
6329
6513
6494
6495
6508
656865666577
6381
6406
6306
6359
6329
6319
6272
6269
6390
6294
6288
6339
6349
6508
6513
6539
6533
6531
6538
6547
6548
6339
6349
6508
6513
6539
6533
6531
6538
6547
6548
AC AC
B
B
53CP
50IB
51IB
52SIB
70
71 72
73
76
77
78
79 80
81
82
5455
56
167167
171
6
UP
SCOTT STREET
CHUR
CHILL
AVE
NUE
WIN
ONA
AVEN
UE
UNDERGROUND PARKING ENTRANCE
RETAIL ENTRANCE
RETAIL422 msup24543 ftsup2
GARBAGE ampMOVING
MOVING ACCESS61 msup2659 ftsup2
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
OFFICE
EXITRESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE
RETAIL ENTRANCE
RETAIL ENTRANCE
EXIT
PET WASH
AMENITY87 msup2937 ftsup2
PARCEL ROOM
MAIL ROOM
CACF
3B TOWNHOUSE62 msup2673 ftsup2
3B TOWNHOUSE60 msup2642 ftsup2
3B TOWNHOUSE57 msup2616 ftsup2
2 STOREY
2 STOREY
2 STOREY
AIR INTAKE
GROUND FLOOR LEGEND
A B C D E F G H I J K
1
2
3
4
6
7
10
9
8
5
RETAIL ENTRANCE
TO SIAMESE CONNECTION10214
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING BUS SHELTER
AIR EXHAUST
GARBAGE ENTRANCE
05m RETAINING WALL
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
FFE = 6569
FFE = 6509
FFE = 6569
FFE = 6445
FFE = 6302
FFE = 6340
FFE = 6340
FFE = 6340
FFE = 6408
FFE = 6974
N 58deg 18 10 E5434
N 72deg 41 30 W
394
N 17deg 16 3
0 E
452
N 23
deg 45
20 W
N 57deg 27 30 E
STAI
R A
STAIR B
BICYCLE LOCKER ROOM(54 LOCKERS)
69 msup2744 ftsup2
STAIR C
10214
N 23
deg 43
30 W
2797
RETAINING WALL PLANTER
RETAINING WALL PLANTER
SANITARY CONNECTION
STORM WATER CONNECTION
WATER MAIN CONNECTION
3B TOWNHOUSE50 msup2542 ftsup2
FFE = 6340
2 STOREY TOWNHOUSE ENTRANCE
FFE = 6449
43590TO SIAMESE CONNECTION
UTILITY POLE
UTILITY POLE
15
575
A450S1
FIBER BINS ZONE
GLASSMETALPLASTIC BIN ZONE
ORGANIC 240L CARTS ZONE
GARBAGE BINS ZONE
OUTDOOR AMENITY311 sm 3347 sf
OUTDOOR AMENITY61 sm
4004 sf
N 57deg 27 10 E
A452S1
6000
COMMERCIAL GARBAGEROOM42 msup2449 ftsup2
FFE = 6302
N 23
deg 52
20 E
792
2249
3023
2888
EXISTING MANHOLE
EXISTING MANHOLE
IRON FENCE
EXISTING HYDRO POLE
OVERHEAD CANOPY
WALKWAY
510
510
661
1191
3097
PROPERTY LINE
MAIN BUILDING ENTRANCE
LINE OF UNDER GROUND GARAGE BELOW
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONFFE
BUILDING ENVELOPE
RETAIL ENTRANCE
EXIT
VEHICLE ENTRANCE EXIT
FIRE HYDRANT
SIAMESE CONNECTION
MANHOLE COVER
GROUND FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
Quadrangle
Quadrangle Architects Limited901 King Street West Suite 701 Toronto ON M5V 3H5t 416 598 1240 wwwquadrangleca
P R O J E C T S C A L E D R A W N R E V I E W E D
I S S U E R E C O R D
R E V I S I O N R E C O R D
Note This drawing is the property of the Architect and may not be reproduced orused without the expressed consent of the Architect The Contractor is responsible for checking and verifying all levels and dimensions and shall report alldiscrepancies to the Architect and obtain clarification prior to commencing work
DW
G 1
8058
D07
-12-
19-0
167
2020
-05-
25 2
30
21 P
M
As indicated
CU
sers
jgra
ntD
ocum
ents
QAL
_AR_
1902
3_20
90 S
cott
Stre
et_R
2020
_jgr
antD
CKLJ
rvt
2070 Scott Street
Ottawa ON
Ground Floor Plan
Azure Urban Developments Inc
19023 DLC
A201S
LS
Date No Description
2019-10-03 Rezoning and Site Plan ApprovalSubmission
19023 ‐ 2090 Scott StreetMay 26 2020
sm sf sm sm sf sm sf sm sf sm sf sm sf sm sfMechPh26 606 1 606 6523 606 0 0
Floor 25 606 1 606 6523 100 506 5447 68 732 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 7Upper Typ Tower 708 1 708 7621 100 608 6544 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 7
Typ 20 ‐ 24 707 5 3535 38050 500 3035 32668 0 0 0 10 15 0 0 25Lower Typ Tower 708 1 708 7621 100 608 6544 5 2 0 1 0 3 0 11
Typ 7 ‐ 19 707 13 9191 98931 1300 7891 84938 65 26 0 12 0 39 0 1426 569 1 569 6125 274 295 3175 136 1464 201 2164 258 2777 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 55 1030 1 1030 11087 114 916 9860 5 1 3 3 0 2 0 144 1030 1 1030 11087 234 796 8568 224 2411 5 3 4 1 0 1 0 143 1257 1 1257 13530 122 1135 12217 69 743 3 4 4 3 1 1 0 162 1365 1 1365 14693 133 1232 13261 43 463 3 2 6 2 2 1 0 16
TH Level 2 305 1 305 3283 0 305 3283 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ground Floor 1428 1 1428 15371 562 866 9322 87 936 372 4004 422 4542 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
26 20922 225203 3945 16555 182739 136 1464 87 936 605 6512 630 6781 422 4542 82 38 17 31 19 45 4 24334 16 7 13 8 19 2
570 ‐ 620 sf 675 ‐725 sm 700 ‐ 750 sf 750 ‐ 800 sf 1050 ‐ 1100 sf 450 ‐ 500 sf 1250 ‐1300 sfTotal Amenity [Indoor + outdoor]
Gross Floor Area 16977 1458 sm 15694 sfSite Area 20903 60 smunit Provided Required 15 18 7 3 8
Floor Space Index (FSI) 81 1458 required [6smunit] Provided 18 7 3 8Total 36
Required Provided Required ProvidedResidential ‐ Residential V C R (BF) Total
minimum residential 05unit 116 129 05suite 122 243 P1 28 5 0 2 33minimum visitor 01unit 23 28
maximum 175 unit 404 P2 0 0 44 2 44
Commercial Commercial 2 2 P3 0 0 44 2 44minimum 125100 sm 5 5 1250 smmaximum 36100 sm 15 P4 0 0 41 0 41
Total 162 TOTAL 123 245 162minimum 144 1suitemaximum 419
7 7
PARKING
GFA Residential
BICYCLE PARKING
TOTALS
AREAS TOTALS amp FSI
combined resident + visitor
Total Suites
PODIUM TOWER
1 Bdrm + D 2 Bdrm
BARRIER FREE SUITES
Suite BreakdownFloor
GBATyp Floor (sm)
No FloorsGBA Gross Building Area (no exclusions)
2008‐326 GFA Exempt
By‐Law 2008‐326
Parking Per Floor
Barrier Free (4 Req)
Indoor Amenity [Private]Indoor Amenity
[Common]Outdoor Amenity [Public Landscape]
Outdoor Amenity [Private] 1 Bdrm Studio Townhouse3 Bdrm2 Bdrm + D
Retail
GROUND FLOOR - RETAIL6569
FLOOR 27010
FLOOR 37305
FLOOR 47600
FLOOR 57895
FLOOR 68250
FLOOR 78610
FLOOR 88905
FLOOR 99200
FLOOR 109495
FLOOR 119790
FLOOR 1210085
FLOOR 1310380
FLOOR 1410675
FLOOR 1510970
FLOOR 1611330
FLOOR 1711625
FLOOR 1811920
FLOOR 1912215
FLOOR 2012510
FLOOR 2112805
FLOOR 2213100
FLOOR 2313395
FLOOR 2413755
P1 Underground Parking Garage Plan5946
P2 Underground Parking Garage Plan5646
GROUND FLOOR - TOWNHOUSES 6340
P3 Underground Parking Garage Plan5346
P4 Underground Parking Garage Plan5046
A B C D E F G H I J K
FLOOR 25 FLOOR PLAN14110
GROUND FLOOR - RESIDENTIAL 6445
GROUND FLOOR - LOADING 6302
AVERAGE GRADE6435
MEZZANINE6229
MECH PH14500
TOP OF MECHANICAL ROOF15000
RETAIL
ELEV
ATO
R C
OR
E
LOBBYTOWNHOUSES
CHURCHILL AVENUE
WINONAAVENUE
5530
2800
2750
2750
4210
3260
5450
P1 UNDERGROUND
P2 UNDERGROUND
P3 UNDERGROUND
P4 UNDERGROUND
P4 UNDERGROUND
P43UNDERGROUND
P2 UNDERGROUND
P1 UNDERGROUND
1050
3400
2830
3000
3000
3000
MEZZANINEBICYCLE PARKING
5000
3900
3550
3600
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
3600
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
2950
3600
3550
2950
2950
2950
4410
1340
7931
0
5763
5466
5166
4871
5946
5346
5046
5646
Quadrangle
Quadrangle Architects Limited901 King Street West Suite 701 Toronto ON M5V 3H5t 416 598 1240 wwwquadrangleca
P R O J E C T S C A L E D R A W N R E V I E W E D
I S S U E R E C O R D
R E V I S I O N R E C O R D
Note This drawing is the property of the Architect and may not be reproduced orused without the expressed consent of the Architect The Contractor is responsible for checking and verifying all levels and dimensions and shall report alldiscrepancies to the Architect and obtain clarification prior to commencing work
DW
G 1
8058
D07
-12-
19-0
167
2020
-05-
25 6
21
39 P
M
1 200
CU
sers
jgra
ntD
ocum
ents
QAL
_AR_
1902
3_20
90 S
cott
Stre
et_R
2020
_jgr
antD
CKLJ
rvt
2070 Scott Street
Ottawa ON
East-West Building Section
Azure Urban Developments Inc
19023 Author
A450S
Checker
FLOOR 2 7010
FLOOR 3 7305
FLOOR 4 7600
P1 Underground Parking Garage Plan 5946
P2 Underground Parking Garage Plan 5646
GROUND FLOOR - TOWNHOUSES 6340
P3 Underground Parking Garage Plan 5346
P4 Underground Parking Garage Plan 5046
1 2 3 4 6 7 10985 11
MEZZANINE 6229
2 STOREY 3B SUITE
UNDERGROUND PARKING
ENTRANCE
GAR
BAG
E amp
MO
VIN
G
1B+D SUITE
2 STOREY 3B TOWNHOUSE
2B SUITE
2B SUITE
2B SUITE
3B SUITE
2B +D SUITE
2 STOREY 3B TOWNHOUSE
2 STOREY 3B TOWNHOUSE
2 STOREY 3B TOWNHOUSE
PUMP ROOM
3240
6700
3460
P4 UNDERGROUND
P43UNDERGROUND
P2 UNDERGROUND
P1 UNDERGROUND
5770
2972
3000
2956
5763
5466
5166
4870
Quadrangle
Quadrangle Architects Limited901 King Street West Suite 701 Toronto ON M5V 3H5t 416 598 1240 wwwquadrangleca
P R O J E C T S C A L E D R A W N R E V I E W E D
I S S U E R E C O R D
R E V I S I O N R E C O R D
Note This drawing is the property of the Architect and may not be reproduced orused without the expressed consent of the Architect The Contractor is responsible for checking and verifying all levels and dimensions and shall report alldiscrepancies to the Architect and obtain clarification prior to commencing work
DW
G 1
8058
D07
-12-
19-0
167
2020
-05-
25 6
14
47 P
M
1 200
CU
sers
jgra
ntD
ocum
ents
QAL
_AR_
1902
3_20
90 S
cott
Stre
et_R
2020
_jgr
antD
CKLJ
rvt
2070 Scott Street
Ottawa ON
North-South Townhouse Section
Azure Urban Developments Inc
19023 Author
A452S
Checker
A452SSection 41
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Appendix C Sanitary Sewer Calculations
C1
Appendix C SANITARY SEWER CALCULATIONS
CAUTION This email originated from an External Sender Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
ATTENTION Ce courriel provient drsquoun expeacutediteur externe Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et nrsquoouvrez pas de piegravece jointe excepteacute si vous connaissez lrsquoexpeacutediteur
CAUTION This email originated from an External Sender Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
ATTENTION Ce courriel provient drsquoun expeacutediteur externe Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et nrsquoouvrez pas de piegravece jointe excepteacute si vous connaissez lrsquoexpeacutediteur
From Tousignant EricTo Paerez AnaCc Wu John Kilborn KrisSubject RE 2070 Scott Street - Sanitary sewer capacityDate Tuesday September 17 2019 31627 PM
Hi Anna There are no concerns with respect to adding the proposed 57 Ls into the existing sanitary system along Scott Street as well as on Winona Avenue RegardsEric Eric Tousignant PEngSenior Water Resources EngineerInfrastructure Services613-580-2424 ext 25129 From Paerez Ana ltAnaPaerezstanteccomgt Sent September 05 2019 1241 PMTo Tousignant Eric ltEricTousignantottawacagtCc Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagt Kilborn Kris ltkriskilbornstanteccomgtSubject RE 2070 Scott Street - Sanitary sewer capacity
Hi EricThe proposed site consists of a 23-storey commercialresidential building with three levels of underground parking The proposed peak flows are 57Ls as per the attached sewer design sheet Please let meknow if you need anything elseThank youAna Ana Paerez P EngWater Resources Engineer
Direct 506 204-5856Fax 506 858-8698AnaPaerezstanteccom
Stantec
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied modified retransmitted or used for any purpose except with Stantecs written authorization If you are not the intended recipient please delete all copies and notify us immediately
From Tousignant Eric ltEricTousignantottawacagt Sent Tuesday September 03 2019 256 PMTo Paerez Ana ltAnaPaerezstanteccomgtCc Wu John ltJohnWuottawacagtSubject RE 2070 Scott Street - Sanitary sewer capacity Hi Ana As per our discussion asset management will do the capacity assessment Please send me your proposed peak flows and we will enter it into our model Eric Eric Tousignant PEngSenior Water Resources EngineerInfrastructure Services613-580-2424 ext 25129 From Paerez Ana ltAnaPaerezstanteccomgt Sent September 03 2019 1210 PMTo Tousignant Eric ltEricTousignantottawacagtSubject 2070 Scott Street - Sanitary sewer capacity
Hi EricWe are working on a servicing brief for a mixed-use development on 20702090 Scott Street (see below) that will consist of a mixed commercialresidential 23-storey building John Wu advised that a sanitarysewer capacity analysis will be required for the site and indicated we contact you to obtain any relevant background information including sanitary flow monitoring dataWe would really appreciate any information you can provide Feel free to contact me if you want to discussThank you Ana Paerez P EngWater Resources Engineer
Direct 506 204-5856Fax 506 858-8698AnaPaerezstanteccom
Stantec
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied modified retransmitted or used for any purpose except with Stantecs written authorization If you are not the intended recipient please delete all copies and notify us immediately
httpsmapsottawacageoottawa
This e-mail originates from the City of Ottawa e-mail system Any distribution use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient(s) isunauthorized Thank you
Le preacutesent courriel a eacuteteacute expeacutedieacute par le systegraveme de courriels de la Ville dOttawa Toute distribution utilisation ou reproduction du courriel ou des renseignements qui sy trouvent parune personne autre que son destinataire preacutevu est interdite Je vous remercie de votre collaboration
This e-mail originates from the City of Ottawa e-mail system Any distribution use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient(s) isunauthorized Thank you
Le preacutesent courriel a eacuteteacute expeacutedieacute par le systegraveme de courriels de la Ville dOttawa Toute distribution utilisation ou reproduction du courriel ou des renseignements qui sy trouvent parune personne autre que son destinataire preacutevu est interdite Je vous remercie de votre collaboration
SUBDIVISION
40 280 Lpday 060 ms
DATE 20 28000 Lhaday 300 ms
REVISION 24 55000 Lhaday 0013
DESIGNED BY FILE NUMBER 160410249 15 35000 Lhaday BEDDING CLASS BCHECKED BY 14 28000 Lhaday MINIMUM COVER 250 m
21
31 033 Lsha HARMON CORRECTION FACTOR 08
27
C+I+I TOTALAREA ID FROM TO AREA POP PEAK PEAK AREA ACCU AREA ACCU AREA ACCU AREA ACCU AREA ACCU PEAK TOTAL ACCU INFILT FLOW LENGTH DIA MATERIAL CLASS SLOPE CAP CAP V VEL VELNUMBER MH MH AREA POP FACT FLOW AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA FLOW AREA AREA FLOW (FULL) PEAK FLOW (FULL) (ACT)
(ha) (ha) (Ls) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (Ls) (ha) (ha) (Ls) (Ls) (m) (mm) () (ls) () (ms) (ms)
COM-1 COM-2 RES-1 BLDG TEE 0160 167 50 22 4 418 0160 418 400 542 0050 0050 0000 000 0000 000 0000 000 0000 000 002 0210 0210 007 551 50 150 PVC DR 28 100 153 3594 086 067225
DESIGN PARAMETERS
AVG DAILY FLOW PERSON MINIMUM VELOCITY
MAXIMUM VELOCITY
MANNINGS n
MAX PEAK FACTOR (RES)=
COMMERCIALMIN PEAK FACTOR (RES)=
INDUSTRIAL (HEAVY)
SANITARY SEWER2090 SCOTT STREET DESIGN SHEET
(City of Ottawa)
WAJ
5272020
INSTITUTIONAL GREEN UNUSED
PERSONS 1 BEDROOM
PIPE
PERSONS 3 BEDROOM
PERSONS TOWNHOME
INDUSTRIAL (L) INFILTRATION
INFILTRATION
CUMULATIVE
AMP
2 PEAKING FACTOR (INDUSTRIAL)
PEAKING FACTOR (ICI gt20)
2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM1 BEDROOM TOWNHOME
LOCATION RESIDENTIAL AREA AND POPULATION COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL (H)
INDUSTRIAL (LIGHT)
INSTITUTIONAL
PERSONS 2 BEDROOM
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Appendix D Stormwater Management Calculations
D1
Appendix D STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
DATE 12 yr 15 yr 110 yr 1100 yrREVISION a = 732951 998071 1174184 1735688 0013 BDESIGNED BY FILE NUMBER b = 6199 6053 6014 6014 200 mCHECKED BY c = 0810 0814 0816 0820 10 min
AREA ID FROM TO AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA C C C C A x C ACCUM A x C ACCUM A x C ACCUM A x C ACCUM T of C I2-YEAR I5-YEAR I10-YEAR I100-YEAR QCONTROL ACCUM QACT LENGTH PIPE WIDTH PIPE PIPE MATERIAL CLASS SLOPE QCAP FULL VEL VEL TIME OF
NUMBER MH MH (2-YEAR) (5-YEAR) (10-YEAR)(100-YEAR) (ROOF) (2-YEAR) (5-YEAR) (10-YEAR)(100-YEAR) (2-YEAR) AxC (2YR) (5-YEAR) AxC (5YR) (10-YEAR) AxC (10YR) (100-YEAR) AxC (100YR) QCONTROL (CIA360) OR DIAMETE HEIGHT SHAPE (FULL) (FULL) (ACT) FLOW
(ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (-) (-) (-) (-) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (min) (mmh) (mmh) (mmh) (mmh) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m) (mm) (mm) (-) (-) (-) (Ls) (-) (ms) (ms) (min)
ROOF1 ROOF2 ROOF3 ROOF4 ROOF5 ROOF6 ROOF7 ROOF8 TRENCH
Stub Ex MH 0181 000 000 000 000 085 000 000 000 0153 0153 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1000 7681 10419 12214 17856 00 00 327 92 200 200 CIRCULAR PVC SDR 28 200 471 694 148 140 011
1011 200 200
LOCATION PIPE SELECTIONDRAINAGE AREA
2020-05-28 (City of Ottawa)2 MANNINGS n =
2090 Scott Street STORM SEWER DESIGN PARAMETERSDESIGN SHEET I = a (t+b)c (As per City of Ottawa Guidelines 2012)
TIME OF ENTRY
BEDDING CLASS WAJ MINIMUM COVERAMP
160410249
Stormwater Management Calculations
File No 160410429Project 20702090 Scott StreetDate 28-May-20 SWM Approach
Post-Development Site Conditions
Overall Runoff Coefficient for Site and Sub-Catchment Areas
Area Runoff Overall(ha) Coefficient Runoff
Catchment Type ID Description A C Coefficient
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF8 Hard 0061 09 0055Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0061 00549 0900
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF7 Hard 0010 09 0009Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0010 0009 0900
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF6 Hard 0003 09 0003Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0003 00027 0900
Uncontrolled - Non-Tributary UNC-2 Hard 0003 09 0003Soft 0005 02 0001
Subtotal 0008 000392 0490
Uncontrolled - Non-Tributary UNC-1 Hard 0013 09 0012Soft 0003 02 0001
Subtotal 0016 001232 077
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF1 Hard 0040 09 0036Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0040 0036 090
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF2 Hard 0001 09 0001Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0001 00009 090
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF3 Hard 0027 09 0024Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0027 00243 090
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF4 Hard 0005 09 0005Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0005 00045 090
Uncontrolled - Tributary Building ROOF5 Hard 0007 09 0006Soft 0000 02 0000
Subtotal 0007 00063 090
Uncontrolled - Tributary Sidewalk TRENCH Hard 0013 09 0012Soft 0014 02 0003
Subtotal 0027 001458 054
Total 0205 017Overall Runoff Coefficient= C 083
Total Controlled Roof Areas 0000 haTotal Uncontrolled Area to Outlet 0181 haTotal Tributary Area to Outlet 0181 ha 085
Total Uncontrolled Areas (Non-Tributary) 0024 ha 068
Total Site 0205 ha
Sub-catchmentArea
Runoff Coefficient Table
A x C
Post development peak flows restricted to the 2-year with a C of 060
Date 5292020 702 AMStantec Consulting Ltd
mrm_2020-05-28_no-roof-storagexlsm Area SummaryWactive1 planning_landscape1604 Projects160410249designanalysisswm
Stormwater Management Calculations
Project 160410429 20702090 Scott Street Project 160410429 20702090 Scott StreetModified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage Modified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage
2 yr Intensity I = a(t + b)c a = 732951 t (min) I (mmhr) 100 yr Intensity I = a(t + b)c a = 1735688 t (min) I (mmhr)City of Ottawa b = 6199 10 7681 City of Ottawa b = 6014 10 17856
c = 081 20 5203 c = 0820 20 1199530 4004 30 918740 3286 40 751550 2804 50 639560 2456 60 558970 2191 70 497980 1983 80 449990 1814 90 4111
100 1675 100 3790110 1557 110 3520120 1456 120 3289
Predevelopment Target Release from Site
Subdrainage AreaArea (ha) 0205
C 060
Typical Time of Concentration
tc I (2 yr) Qtarget(min) (mmhr) (Ls)
10 7681 263
2 YEAR Modified Rational Method for Entire Site 100 YEAR Modified Rational Method for Entire Site
Subdrainage Area ROOF8 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF8 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0061 Area (ha) 0061
C 090 C 100
tc l (5 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 1172 1172 10 17856 3028 302820 5203 794 794 20 11995 2034 203430 4004 611 611 30 9187 1558 155840 3286 502 502 40 7515 1274 127450 2804 428 428 50 6395 1085 108560 2456 375 375 60 5589 948 94870 2191 334 334 70 4979 844 84480 1983 303 303 80 4499 763 76390 1814 277 277 90 4111 697 697
100 1675 256 256 100 3790 643 643110 1557 238 238 110 3520 597 597120 1456 222 222 120 3289 558 558
Subdrainage Area ROOF7 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF7 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0010 Area (ha) 0010
C 090 C 100
tc l (5 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 192 192 10 17856 496 49620 5203 130 130 20 11995 333 33330 4004 100 100 30 9187 255 25540 3286 082 082 40 7515 209 20950 2804 070 070 50 6395 178 17860 2456 061 061 60 5589 155 15570 2191 055 055 70 4979 138 13880 1983 050 050 80 4499 125 12590 1814 045 045 90 4111 114 114
100 1675 042 042 100 3790 105 105110 1557 039 039 110 3520 098 098120 1456 036 036 120 3289 091 091
Subdrainage Area ROOF6 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF6 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0003 Area (ha) 0003
C 090 C 100
tc l (5 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 058 058 10 17856 149 14920 5203 039 039 20 11995 100 10030 4004 030 030 30 9187 077 07740 3286 025 025 40 7515 063 06350 2804 021 021 50 6395 053 05360 2456 018 018 60 5589 047 04770 2191 016 016 70 4979 042 04280 1983 015 015 80 4499 038 03890 1814 014 014 90 4111 034 034
100 1675 013 013 100 3790 032 032110 1557 012 012 110 3520 029 029120 1456 011 011 120 3289 027 027
Subdrainage Area UNC-2 Uncontrolled - Non-Tributary Subdrainage Area UNC-2 Uncontrolled - Non-TributaryArea (ha) 0008 Area (ha) 0008
C 049 C 061
tc l (5 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 084 084 10 17856 243 24320 5203 057 057 20 11995 163 16330 4004 044 044 30 9187 125 12540 3286 036 036 40 7515 102 10250 2804 031 031 50 6395 087 08760 2456 027 027 60 5589 076 07670 2191 024 024 70 4979 068 06880 1983 022 022 80 4499 061 06190 1814 020 020 90 4111 056 056
100 1675 018 018 100 3790 052 052110 1557 017 017 110 3520 048 048120 1456 016 016 120 3289 045 045
Post development peak flows restricted to C=060
Date 5292020Stantec Consulting Ltd Page 2 of 5
mrm_2020-05-28_no-roof-storagexlsm Modified RMWactive1 planning_landscape1604 Projects160410249designanalysisswm
Stormwater Management Calculations
Project 160410429 20702090 Scott Street Project 160410429 20702090 Scott StreetModified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage Modified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage
Subdrainage Area UNC-1 Uncontrolled - Non-Tributary Subdrainage Area UNC-1 Uncontrolled - Non-TributaryArea (ha) 0016 Area (ha) 0016
C 077 C 096
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 26 26 10 17856 76 7620 5203 18 18 20 11995 51 5130 4004 14 14 30 9187 39 3940 3286 11 11 40 7515 32 3250 2804 10 10 50 6395 27 2760 2456 08 08 60 5589 24 2470 2191 08 08 70 4979 21 2180 1983 07 07 80 4499 19 1990 1814 06 06 90 4111 18 18
100 1675 06 06 100 3790 16 16110 1557 05 05 110 3520 15 15120 1456 05 05 120 3289 14 14
Subdrainage Area ROOF1 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF1 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0040 Area (ha) 0040
C 090 C 100
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored Depth(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (mm)
10 7681 77 77 10 17856 199 19920 5203 52 52 20 11995 133 13330 4004 40 40 30 9187 102 10240 3286 33 33 40 7515 84 8450 2804 28 28 50 6395 71 7160 2456 25 25 60 5589 62 6270 2191 22 22 70 4979 55 5580 1983 20 20 80 4499 50 5090 1814 18 18 90 4111 46 46
100 1675 17 17 100 3790 42 42110 1557 16 16 110 3520 39 39120 1456 15 15 120 3289 37 37
Date 5292020Stantec Consulting Ltd Page 3 of 5
mrm_2020-05-28_no-roof-storagexlsm Modified RMWactive1 planning_landscape1604 Projects160410249designanalysisswm
Stormwater Management Calculations
Project 160410429 20702090 Scott Street Project 160410429 20702090 Scott StreetModified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage Modified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage
Subdrainage Area ROOF2 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF2 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0001 Area (ha) 0001
C 090 C 100
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored Depth tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored Depth(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (mm) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (mm)
10 7681 02 02 10 17856 05 0520 5203 01 01 20 11995 03 0330 4004 01 01 30 9187 03 0340 3286 01 01 40 7515 02 0250 2804 01 01 50 6395 02 0260 2456 01 01 60 5589 02 0270 2191 01 01 70 4979 01 0180 1983 00 00 80 4499 01 0190 1814 00 00 90 4111 01 01
100 1675 00 00 100 3790 01 01110 1557 00 00 110 3520 01 01120 1456 00 00 120 3289 01 01
Subdrainage Area ROOF3 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF3 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0027 Area (ha) 0027
C 090 C 100
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 52 52 10 17856 134 13420 5203 35 35 20 11995 90 9030 4004 27 27 30 9187 69 6940 3286 22 22 40 7515 56 5650 2804 19 19 50 6395 48 4860 2456 17 17 60 5589 42 4270 2191 15 15 70 4979 37 3780 1983 13 13 80 4499 34 3490 1814 12 12 90 4111 31 31
100 1675 11 11 100 3790 28 28110 1557 11 11 110 3520 26 26120 1456 10 10 120 3289 25 25
Subdrainage Area ROOF4 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF4 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0005 Area (ha) 0005
C 090 C 100
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 10 10 10 17856 25 2520 5203 07 07 20 11995 17 1730 4004 05 05 30 9187 13 1340 3286 04 04 40 7515 10 1050 2804 04 04 50 6395 09 0960 2456 03 03 60 5589 08 0870 2191 03 03 70 4979 07 0780 1983 02 02 80 4499 06 0690 1814 02 02 90 4111 06 06
100 1675 02 02 100 3790 05 05110 1557 02 02 110 3520 05 05120 1456 02 02 120 3289 05 05
Subdrainage Area ROOF5 Uncontrolled - Tributary Building Subdrainage Area ROOF5 Uncontrolled - Tributary BuildingArea (ha) 0007 Area (ha) 0007
C 090 C 100
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 13 13 10 17856 35 3520 5203 09 09 20 11995 23 2330 4004 07 07 30 9187 18 1840 3286 06 06 40 7515 15 1550 2804 05 05 50 6395 12 1260 2456 04 04 60 5589 11 1170 2191 04 04 70 4979 10 1080 1983 03 03 80 4499 09 0990 1814 03 03 90 4111 08 08
100 1675 03 03 100 3790 07 07110 1557 03 03 110 3520 07 07120 1456 03 03 120 3289 06 06
Date 5292020Stantec Consulting Ltd Page 4 of 5
mrm_2020-05-28_no-roof-storagexlsm Modified RMWactive1 planning_landscape1604 Projects160410249designanalysisswm
Stormwater Management Calculations
Project 160410429 20702090 Scott Street Project 160410429 20702090 Scott StreetModified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage Modified Rational Method Calculatons for Storage
Subdrainage Area TRENCH Uncontrolled - Tributary Sidewalk Subdrainage Area TRENCH Uncontrolled - Tributary SidewalkArea (ha) 0027 Area (ha) 0027
C 054 C 068
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 31 31 10 17856 90 9020 5203 21 21 20 11995 61 6130 4004 16 16 30 9187 47 4740 3286 13 13 40 7515 38 3850 2804 11 11 50 6395 32 3260 2456 10 10 60 5589 28 2870 2191 09 09 70 4979 25 2580 1983 08 08 80 4499 23 2390 1814 07 07 90 4111 21 21
100 1675 07 07 100 3790 19 19110 1557 06 06 110 3520 18 18120 1456 06 06 120 3289 17 17
Subdrainage Area Site Area Tributary to Internal Cistern Subdrainage Area Site Area Tributary to Internal CisternArea (ha) 0181 Area (ha) 0181
tc l (2 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored tc l (100 yr) Qactual Qrelease Qstored Vstored(min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3) (min) (mmhr) (Ls) (Ls) (Ls) (m^3)
10 7681 3271 1619 1652 991 10 17856 8549 1619 6931 415820 5203 2216 1619 597 717 20 11995 5743 1619 4124 494930 4004 1705 1619 087 156 30 9187 4399 1619 2780 500440 3286 1399 1399 000 000 40 7515 3598 1619 1979 475050 2804 1194 1194 000 000 50 6395 3062 1619 1443 433060 2456 1046 1046 000 000 60 5589 2676 1619 1058 380770 2191 933 933 000 000 70 4979 2384 1619 765 321480 1983 844 844 000 000 80 4499 2154 1619 536 257090 1814 773 773 000 000 90 4111 1968 1619 350 1889
100 1675 713 713 000 000 100 3790 1815 1619 196 1177110 1557 663 663 000 000 110 3520 1685 1619 067 441120 1456 620 620 000 000 120 3289 1575 1575 000 000
SUMMARY TO OUTLET SUMMARY TO OUTLETVrequired Vavailable Vrequired Vavailable
Tributary Area 0181 ha Tributary Area 0181 ha2yr Controlled Roof Flow to Cistern 00 100yr Controlled Roof Flow to Cistern 00 Ls
2yr Uncontrolled Flow to Cistern 327 Ls 10 50 m3 Ok 100yr Uncontrolled Flow to Cistern 855 Ls 50 50 m3 Ok2yr Cistern Outflow 162 Ls 100yr Cistern Outflow 162 Ls
Non-Tributary Area 0024 ha Non-Tributary Area 0024 haTotal 2yr Non-Tributary Flow 35 Ls Total 100yr Non-Tributary Flow 101 Ls
Total Area 0205 ha Total Area 0205 haTotal 2yr Flow 197 Ls Total 100yr Flow 263 Ls
Target 263 Ls Target 263 Ls
Date 5292020Stantec Consulting Ltd Page 5 of 5
mrm_2020-05-28_no-roof-storagexlsm Modified RMWactive1 planning_landscape1604 Projects160410249designanalysisswm
SITE SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BRIEF ndash 2070 SCOTT STREET OTTAWA ON
Appendix E Geotechnical Report and Environmental Site Assessment
E1
Appendix E GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
GeotechnicalEngineering
EnvironmentalEngineering
Hydrogeology
GeologicalEngineering
Materials Testing
Building Science
Archaeological Studies
Paterson Group IncConsulting Engineers154 Colonnade Road SouthOttawa (Nepean) OntarioCanada K2E 7J5
Tel (613) 226-7381Fax (613) 226-6344wwwpatersongroupca
patersongroup
Geotechnical InvestigationProposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott StreetOttawa Ontario
Prepared For
Westboro Point Developments Ltd
July 26 2019
Report PG4935-1
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Table of ContentsPage
10 Introduction 1
20 Proposed Project 1
30 Method of Investigation31 Field Investigation 2
32 Field Survey 3
33 Laboratory Testing 4
34 Analytical Testing 4
40 Observations41 Surface Conditions 5
42 Subsurface Profile 5
43 Groundwater 6
50 Discussion51 Geotechnical Assessment 7
52 Site Grading and Preparation 7
53 Foundation Design 10
54 Design for Earthquakes 10
55 Basement Slab 12
56 Basement Wall 12
57 Rock Anchor Design 14
58 Pavement Structure 17
60 Design and Construction Precautions61 Foundation Drainage and Backfill 19
62 Protection of Footings Against Frost Action 20
63 Excavation Side Slopes and Temporary Shoring 21
64 Pipe Bedding and Backfill 23
65 Groundwater Control 23
66 Winter Construction 25
67 Corrosion Potential and Sulphate 25
70 Recommendations 26
80 Statement of Limitations 27
Report PG4935-1
July 26 2019 Page i
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Appendices
Appendix 1 Soil Profile and Test Data Sheets
Symbols and Terms
Soil Profile and Test Data Sheets by Others
Uniaxial Compressive Strength Testing Results
Analytical Testing Results
Appendix 2 Figure 1 - Key Plan
Figure 2 and 3 - Seismic Shear Wave Velocity Profiles
Figure 4 - Groundwater Suppression System
Drawing PG4935-1 - Test Hole Location Plan
Report PG4935-1
July 26 2019 Page ii
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
10 Introduction
Paterson Group (Paterson) was commissioned by Westboro Point Developments Ltd
to conduct a geotechnical investigation for the proposed multi-storey building to be
located at 2070 Scott Street in the City of Ottawa Ontario (refer to Figure 1 - Key Plan
in Appendix 2)
The objectives of the current investigation were to
lsquo determine the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site based on
available subsoil information from current and previous investigations
lsquo provide geotechnical recommendations for the design of the proposed
development including construction considerations which may affect the design
The following report has been prepared specifically and solely for the aforementioned
project which is described herein This report contains our findings and includes
geotechnical recommendations pertaining to the design and construction of the
commercial development as understood at the time of writing this report
20 Proposed Project
Based on the preliminary concept drawings it is our understanding that the proposed
project is to consist of a multi-storey building with 2 to 3 levels of underground parking
Associated access lanes parking areas and landscaped margins are also anticipated
as part of the proposed development
It is further understood that the proposed building will be serviced with municipal water
and sewer
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 1
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
30 Method of Investigation
31 Field Investigation
Field Program
The field program for the current geotechnical investigation was carried out on May 15
2019 At that time a total of three (3) boreholes (BH 4-19 through BH 6-19) were
advanced to a maximum depth of 83 m below the existing ground surface The
boreholes were distributed in a manner to provide general coverage of the proposed
development taking into consideration existing site features and underground utilities
Previous geotechnical investigations conducted at the subject site by Paterson included
three (3) boreholes (BH 1 through BH 3) completed on April 2 2013 one (1) test
pit (TP 1) completed on April 3 2013 five (5) test pits (TP 1 through TP 5) completed
on October 21 2002 five (5) boreholes (BH 1 through BH 5) completed on October 15
2001 and four (4) boreholes (BH 1-1 through BH 4-1) completed on November 18
1996 The locations of the test holes are shown on Drawing PG4935-1 - Test Hole
Location Plan included in Appendix 2
The boreholes were drilled using a track-mounted auger drill rig operated by a two
person crew The drilling procedure consisted of augering to the required depths at the
selected locations and sampling the overburden The test pit procedure consisted of
excavating to the required depths at the selected locations and sampling the
overburden The test pits were backfilled with the excavated soil upon completion All
fieldwork was conducted under the full-time supervision of Paterson personnel under
the direction of a senior engineer
A field investigation program was also completed at the subject site by others during
the period of April 2 through 5 2013 consisting of a total of 12 boreholes (BHMW 1
through BH 12) advanced to a maximum depth of 135 m below the existing ground
surface The borehole logs prepared by others are provided in Appendix 1
Sampling and In Situ Testing
Soil samples were recovered from a 50 mm diameter split-spoon the auger flights or
grab samples The split-spoon auger and grab samples were classified on site and
placed in sealed plastic bags All samples were transported to our laboratory The
depths at which the split-spoon auger and grab samples were recovered from the
boreholes are presented as SS AU and G respectively on the Soil Profile and Test
Data sheets
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 2
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were conducted in conjunction with the recovery of
the split-spoon samples The SPT results are recorded as ldquoNrdquo values on the Soil
Profile and Test Data sheets The ldquoNrdquo value is the number of blows required to drive
the split-spoon sample 300 mm into the soil after the initial penetration of 150 mm
using a 635 kg hammer falling from a height of 760 mm
Diamond drilling was completed at select locations to confirm the bedrock quality A
recovery value and a Rock Quality Designation (RQD) value were calculated for each
drilled section of bedrock and are presented as RC on the Soil Profile and Test Data
sheets in Appendix 1 The recovery value is the ratio of the bedrock sample length
recovered over the drilled section length in percentage The RQD value is the total
length ratio of intact rock core length more than 100 mm in one drilled section over the
length of the drilled section in percentage These values are indicative of the quality
of the bedrock
The subsurface conditions observed in the boreholes were recorded in detail in the
field The soil and bedrock profiles are presented on the Soil Profile and Test Data
sheets in Appendix 1
Groundwater
Monitoring wells were installed in boreholes BH 1 BH 3 BH 4-19 BH 5-19 and
BH 6-19 to permit the monitoring of water levels subsequent to the completion of the
sampling program
Sample Storage
All samples will be stored in the laboratory for a period of one month after issuance of
this report They will then be discarded unless we are otherwise directed
32 Field Survey
The test holes completed during the most recent geotechnical investigations on
May 15 2019 and April 2 and 3 2013 were selected and determined in the field by
Paterson personnel to provide general coverage of the subject site The location and
ground surface elevation at these borehole locations were surveyed by Paterson
personnel The test holes were surveyed with respect to a temporary benchmark
(TBM) consisting of the top spindle of a fire hydrant located along the west property
boundary near Churchill Avenue A geodetic elevation of 6618 m was provided for the
TBM
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 3
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
The location and ground surface elevation at each test hole location is presented on
Drawing PG4935-1 - Test Hole Location Plan in Appendix 2
33 Laboratory Testing
Soil and bedrock samples recovered from the subject site were visually examined in
our laboratory to review the field logs Two bedrock samples were submitted for
uniaxial compressive strength the results of which are provided in Appendix 1
34 Analytical Testing
One soil sample was submitted for analytical testing to assess the potential for
exposed ferrous metals and the sulphate potential against subsurface concrete
structures The sample was submitted to determine the concentration of sulphate and
chloride the resistivity and the pH of the soil The results are provided in Appendix 1
and are discussed further in Section 67
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 4
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
40 Observations
41 Surface Conditions
The subject site is currently vacant with a mixture of asphaltic pavement structure
granular crushed stone and some concrete and construction debris located at the
existing ground surface The site is bordered by Scott Street to the north Winona
Avenue to the east residential properties to the south and Churchill Avenue to the
west The existing ground surface across the site slopes downward gradually from
west to east from approximate geodetic elevation 655 m at the west property line to
approximate geodetic elevation 63 m at the east property line
It is understood that the site was formerly occupied by two commercial buildings a
3 storey building with a basement on the west portion of the site and a single storey
slab on grade building on the east portion of the site
42 Subsurface Profile
Overburden
Generally the subsurface profile at the borehole locations consists of fill underlying the
existing crushed stone surface or 80 to 150 mm thick asphalt surface The fill material
extended to approximate depths of 14 to 38 m below the existing ground surface and
generally consisted of loose to dense brown silty sand to silty clay with trace to some
gravel cobbles boulders and construction debris such as glass wood chips brick and
concrete
Bedrock
Practical refusal to augering or excavation was encountered at the test holes at depths
of 14 to 38 m below the existing ground surface Bedrock was cored at boreholes
BH 1 BH 3 BH 4-19 BH 5-19 and BH 6-19 to depths of 77 to 135 m and consisted
of a poor to excellent quality limestone to limestone with interbedded dolostone and
shale
Based on available geological mapping bedrock in the area of the subject site consists
of interbedded limestone and dolostone of the Gull River Formation with drift
thicknesses of 1 to 2 m
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 5
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
43 Groundwater
Groundwater levels were measured in the groundwater monitoring wells BH 1 and BH 3
on April 4 2013 and in the groundwater monitoring wells BH 4-19 through BH 6-19 on
May 15 2019 The measured groundwater level (GWL) readings are presented in
Table 1 below and on the Soil Profile and Test Data sheets in Appendix 1
However it should be noted that groundwater levels are subject to seasonal
fluctuations Therefore the groundwater level could vary at the time of construction
Table 1 - Measured Groundwater Levels
Test Hole
Location
Ground
Surface
Elevation (m)
Groundwater LevelDate
Depth (m) Elevation (m)
BH 1 6509 693 5816 April 4 2013
BH 3 6307 527 5780 April 4 2013
BH 4-19 6371 710 5661 May 22 2019
BH 5-19 6334 614 5720 May 22 2019
BH 6-19 6299 582 5717 May 22 2019
Note - The ground surface elevations are referenced to a temporary benchmark (TBM) consisting of the
top spindle of the fire hydrant located along the west property boundary near Churchill Avenue with a
geodetic elevation of 6618 m
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 6
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
50 Discussion
51 Geotechnical Assessment
From a geotechnical perspective the subject site is adequate for the proposed multi-
storey building The proposed building is expected to be founded on footings placed
on clean surface sounded bedrock
Bedrock removal will be required to complete the underground parking levels Line
drilling and controlled blasting where large quantities of bedrock need to be removed
is recommended The blasting operations should be planned and completed under the
guidance of a professional engineer with experience in blasting operations
The above and other considerations are discussed in the following sections
52 Site Grading and Preparation
Stripping Depth
Due to the relatively shallow depth of the bedrock at the subject site and the anticipated
founding level for the proposed building all existing overburden material should be
excavated from within the proposed building footprint Bedrock removal will be required
for the construction of the underground levels
Existing foundation walls and other construction debris should be entirely removed from
within the building perimeter Under paved areas existing construction remnants such
as foundation walls should be excavated to a minimum of 1 m below final grade
Bedrock Removal
Based on the volume of the bedrock encountered in the area it is expected that line-
drilling in conjunction with hoe-ramming or controlled blasting will be required to remove
the bedrock In areas of weathered bedrock and where only a small quantity of bedrock
is to be removed bedrock removal may be possible by hoe-ramming
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 7
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Prior to considering blasting operations the blasting effects on the existing services
buildings and other structures should be addressed A pre-blast or pre-construction
survey of the existing structures located in proximity to the blasting operations should
be conducted prior to commencing construction The extent of the survey should be
determined by the blasting consultant and sufficient to respond to any inquiriesclaims
related to the blasting operations
As a general guideline peak particle velocity (measured at the structures) should not
exceed 25 mms during the blasting program to reduce the risks of damage to the
existing structures
The blasting operations should be planned and conducted under the supervision of a
licensed professional engineer who is an experienced blasting consultant
Excavation side slopes in sound bedrock can be completed with almost vertical side
walls A minimum of 1 m horizontal bench should remain between the bottom of the
overburden and the top of the bedrock surface to provide an area for potential
sloughing or to provide a stable base for the overburden shoring system
Vibration Considerations
Construction operations could be the cause of vibrations and possibly sources of
nuisance to the community Therefore means to reduce the vibration levels as much
as possible should be incorporated in the construction operations to maintain a
cooperative environment with the residents
The following construction equipment could be the source of vibrations piling
equipment hoe ram compactor dozer crane truck traffic etc The construction of the
shoring system with soldier piles would utilize such equipment Vibrations whether it
is caused by blasting operations or by construction operations could be the cause of
the source of detrimental vibrations on the adjoining buildings and structures
Therefore it is recommended that all vibrations be limited
Two parameters determine the permissible vibrations the maximum peak particle
velocity and the frequency For low frequency vibrations the maximum allowable peak
particle velocity is less than that for high frequency vibrations As a guideline the peak
particle velocity should be less than 15 mms between frequencies of 4 to 12 Hz and
50 mms above a frequency of 40 Hz (interpolate between 12 and 40 Hz) These
guidelines are for current construction standards Considering there are several
sensitive buildings in close proximity to the subject site consideration to lowering these
guidelines is recommended
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 8
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
These guidelines are above perceptible human level and in some cases could be very
disturbing to some people Therefore a pre-construction survey is recommended to
minimize the risks of claims during or following the construction of the proposed
building
Horizontal Rock Anchors
Horizontal rock anchors may be required at specific locations to prevent pop-outs of the
bedrock especially in areas where bedrock fractures are conducive to the failure of the
bedrock surface
The requirement for horizontal rock anchors will be evaluated during the excavation
operations and should be discussed with the structural engineer during the design
stage
Fill Placement
Fill placed for grading beneath the building areas should consist unless otherwise
specified of clean imported granular fill such as Ontario Provincial Standard
Specifications (OPSS) Granular A or Granular B Type II The imported fill material
should be tested and approved prior to delivery to the site The fill should be placed in
maximum of 300 mm thick loose lifts and compacted using suitable compaction
equipment Fill placed beneath the buildings should be compacted to a minimum of
98 of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (SPMDD)
Non-specified existing fill along with site-excavated soil could be placed as general
landscaping fill where settlement of the ground surface is of minor concern These
materials should be spread in lifts with a maximum thickness of 300 mm and
compacted by the tracks of the spreading equipment to minimize voids Non-specified
existing fill and site-excavated soils are not suitable for placement as backfill against
foundation walls unless used in conjunction with a geocomposite drainage membrane
such as Delta Drain 6000
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 9
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
53 Foundation Design
Footings placed on a clean surface sounded limestone bedrock surface can be
designed using a factored bearing resistance value at ultimate limit states (ULS) of
1500 kPa incorporating a geotechnical resistance factor of 05
A clean surface-sounded bedrock bearing surface should be free of loose materials
and have no near surface seams voids fissures or open joints which can be detected
from surface sounding with a rock hammer
A factored bearing resistance value at ULS of 4500 kPa incorporating a geotechnical
resistance factor of 05 could be provided if founded on limestone bedrock which is free
of seams fractures and voids within 15 m below the founding level This should be
verified by completing and probing 50 mm diameter drill holes to a depth of 15 m below
the founding level within the all the footing footprints A minimum of one probe hole
should be completed per footing The drill hole inspection should be completed by the
geotechnical consultant
Settlement
Footings bearing on an acceptable bedrock bearing surface and designed using the
bearing resistance values provided herein will be subjected to negligible potential post-
construction total and differential settlements
54 Design for Earthquakes
A site specific shear wave velocity test was completed to accurately determine the
applicable seismic site classification for foundation design of the proposed building as
presented in Table 4184A of the Ontario Building Code 2012 A seismic shear wave
velocity test was completed by Paterson at the subject site Two shear wave velocity
profiles are presented in Appendix 2
Field Program
The shear wave test location is presented in Drawing PG4935-1 - Test Hole Location
Plan in Appendix 2 Paterson field personnel installed 24 horizontal geophones in a
straight line oriented roughly in a north-south direction along the eastern site boundary
The 45 Hz horizontal geophones were mounted to the surface by means of two 75 mm
ground spikes attached to the geophone land case The geophones were spaced at
1 m intervals and connected by a geophone spread cable to a Geode 24 Channel
seismograph
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 10
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
The seismograph was connected to a computer and a trigger switch attached to a 12
pound dead blow hammer The hammer trigger sends a signal to the seismograph to
commence recording The hammer strikes an I-Beam seated into the ground surface
which produces a polarized shear wave The shots are repeated between four to eight
times at each shot location to provide an accurate signal and reduce noise The shot
locations are completed in forward and reverse directions (ie striking both sides of the
I-Beam seated parallel to the geophone array) The shot locations were distributed at
the centre of the geophone array and 1 2 and 5 m away from the first and last
geophone
Data Processing and Interpretation
Interpretation for the shear wave velocity results were completed by Paterson The
shear wave velocity measurement was calculated by the reflectionrefraction methods
The interpretation is performed by recovering arrival times from direct and refracted
waves The interpretation is repeated at each shot location to provide an average shear
wave velocity Vs30 immediately below the proposed building foundation of the upper
30 m profile To compute the bedrock depth at each location the layer intercept times
velocities from different layers and critical distances are interpreted from the shear wave
graphs The bedrock velocity was interpreted by the main refractor wave velocity which
is considered a conservative estimate of the bedrock velocity due to the increasing
quality of the bedrock with depth As bedrock quality increases the bedrock shear
wave velocity increases
The Vs30 was calculated using the standard equation for average shear wave velocity
from the Ontario Building Code (OBC) 2012 as presented below
Based on the seismic results the average shear wave velocity Vs30 for shallow
foundations located at the subject site is 1805 ms Therefore a Site Class A is
applicable for design of the proposed building at the subject site as per Table 4184A
of the OBC 2012 The soils underlying the subject site are not susceptible to
liquefaction
VDepth m
Depth m
Vs m s
Depth m
Vs m s
Vm
m
m s
m
m s
V m s
s
OfInterest
Layer
Layer
Layer
Layer
s
s
30
1
1
2
2
30
30
30
0
233
30
1805
1805
=
+
=
+
=
( )
( ( )
( )
( )
( )
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 11
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
55 Basement Slab
For the subject site development all overburden soil should be removed from the
subject site and the basement floor slab will be founded on a bedrock medium OPSS
Granular A or Granular B Type II with a maximum particle size of 50 mm are
recommended for backfilling below the floor slab It is recommended that the upper 150
to 200 mm of sub-slab fill consists of a 19 mm clear crushed stone
In consideration of the groundwater conditions encountered at the time of the field
investigation an underfloor drainage system consisting of lines of perforated drainage
pipe subdrains connected to a positive outlet should be provided in the clear stone
backfill under the lower basement floor
56 Basement Wall
There are several combinations of backfill materials and retained soils that could be
applicable for the basement walls of the subject structure However the conditions can
be well-represented by assuming the retained soil consists of a material with an angle
of internal friction of 30 degrees and a bulk (drained) unit weight of 20 kNm3
It is expected that a portion of the basement walls are to be poured against a composite
drainage blanket which will be placed against the exposed bedrock face A nominal
coefficient of at-rest earth pressure of 005 is recommended in conjunction with a bulk
unit weight of 235 kNm3 (effective 155 kNm3) where this condition occurs Further
a seismic earth pressure component will not be applicable for the foundation wall which
is poured against the bedrock face It is expected that the seismic earth pressure will
be transferred to the underground floor slabs which should be designed to
accommodate these pressures A hydrostatic groundwater pressure should be added
for the portion below the groundwater level
Undrained conditions are anticipated (ie below the groundwater level) Therefore the
applicable effective (undrained) unit weight of the retained soil can be taken as
13 kNm3 where applicable A hydrostatic pressure should be added to the total static
earth pressure when using the effective unit weight
Two (2) distinct conditions static and seismic must be reviewed for design calculations
The parameters for design calculations for the two (2) conditions are presented below
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 12
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Static Conditions
The static horizontal earth pressure (po) can be calculated using a triangular earth
pressure distribution equal to KomiddotγmiddotH where
Ko = at-rest earth pressure coefficient of the applicable retained soil or bedrock
γ = unit weight of fill of the applicable retained soil or bedrock (kNm3)
H = height of the wall (m)
An additional pressure having a magnitude equal to Komiddotq and acting on the entire height
of the wall should be added to the above diagram for any surcharge loading q (kPa)
that may be placed at ground surface adjacent to the wall The surcharge pressure will
only be applicable for static analyses and should not be used in conjunction with the
seismic loading case
Actual earth pressures could be higher than the ldquoat-restrdquo case if care is not exercised
during the compaction of the backfill materials to maintain a minimum separation of
03 m from the walls with the compaction equipment
Seismic Conditions
The total seismic force (PAE) includes both the earth force component (Po) and the
seismic component (ΔPAE)
The seismic earth force (ΔPAE) can be calculated using 0375middotacmiddotγmiddotH2g where
ac = (145-amaxg)amax
γ = unit weight of fill of the applicable retained soil (kNm3)
H = height of the wall (m)
g = gravity 981 ms2
The peak ground acceleration (amax) for the Ottawa area is 032g according to the
OBC 2012 Note that the vertical seismic coefficient is assumed to be zero
The earth force component (Po) under seismic conditions can be calculated using
Po = 05 Ko γ H2 where Ko = 05 for the soil conditions noted above
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 13
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
The total earth force (PAE) is considered to act at a height h (m) from the base of the
wall where
h = Pomiddot(H3)+ΔPAEmiddot(06middotH)PAE
The earth forces calculated are unfactored For the ULS case the earth loads should
be factored as live loads as per the OBC 2012
57 Rock Anchor Design
The geotechnical design of grouted rock anchors in limestone bedrock is based upon
two possible failure modes The rock anchor can fail by shear failure along the
groutrock interface or by pullout at 60 to 90 degree cone of rock with the apex of the
cone near the middle of the bonded length of the anchor Interaction may develop
between the failure cones of anchors that are relatively close to one another resulting
in a total group capacity smaller than the sum of the individual anchor load capacity
A third failure mode of shear failure along the groutsteel interface should be reviewed
by a qualified structural engineer to ensure all typical failure modes have been
reviewed Typical rock anchor suppliers such as Dywidag Systems International
(DSI Canada) or Williams Form Engineering have qualified personnel on staff to
recommend appropriate rock anchor size and materials
The centre to centre spacing between bond lengths should be a minimum of 12 m or
four times the anchor hole diameter to ensure the group influence effects are
minimized Anchors in close proximity to each other are recommended to be grouted
at the same time to ensure any fractures or voids are completely in-filled and grout fluid
does not flow from one hole to an adjacent empty one
Anchors can be of the ldquopassiverdquo or the ldquopost-tensionedrdquo type depending on whether the
anchor tendon is provided with post-tensioned load or not prior to servicing
Regardless of whether an anchor is a passive or the post tensioned type it is
recommended that the anchor is provided with a fixed anchor length at the base which
will provide the capacity and an free anchor length between the rock surface and the
top of the bonded length As the depth at which the apex of the shear failure cone
develops midway along the bonded length a fully bonded anchor would tend to have
a much shallower cone and therefore less geotechnical resistance than one where the
bonded length is limited to the bottom part of the overall anchor
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 14
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Permanent anchors should be provided with corrosion protection As a minimum this
requires that the entire drill hole be filled with cementitious grout The free anchor
length is provided by installing a sleeve to act as a bond break with the sleeve filled
with grout Double corrosion protection can be provided with factory assembled
systems such as those available from Dywidag Systems International or Williams Form
Engineering Corp
Grout to Rock Bond
The unconfined compressive strength of limestone at the subject site ranges between
65 and 125 MPa which is stronger than most routine grouts A factored tensile grout
to rock bond resistance value at ULS of 10 MPa incorporating a resistance factor of
03 should be provided A minimum grout strength of 40 MPa is recommended
Rock Cone Uplift
The rock anchor capacity depends on the dimensions of the rock anchors and the
anchorage system configuration Based on existing bedrock information a Rock Mass
Rating (RMR) of 69 was assigned to the bedrock and Hoek and Brown parameters (m
and s) were taken as 0575 and 000293 respectively
Recommended Grouted Rock Anchor Lengths
Parameters used to calculate grouted rock anchor lengths are provided in Table 1
Table 2 - Parameters used in Rock Anchor Review
Grout to Rock Bond Strength - Factored at ULS 10 MPa
Compressive Strength - Grout 40 MPa
Rock Mass Rating (RMR) - Good quality Limestone
Hoek and Brown parameters
69
m=0575 and s=000293
Unconfined compressive strength - Limestone 65 MPa
Effective unit weight - Bedrock 15 kNm3
Apex angle of failure cone 60o
Apex of failure cone mid-point of fixed anchor length
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 15
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
The fixed anchor length will depend on the diameter of the drill holes Recommended
anchor lengths are provided in Table 3 The factored tensile resistance values provided
are based on a single anchor with no group influence effects
Table 3 - Recommended Rock Anchor Lengths - Grouted Rock Anchor
Diameter of
Drill Hole
(mm)
Anchor Lengths (m) Factored Tensile
Resistance
(kN)Bonded
Length
Unbonded
Length
Total
Length
75
20 08 28 450
26 1 36 600
32 12 44 750
45 2 65 1500
125
16 06 22 600
2 1 3 750
26 14 40 1000
32 18 50 1250
Other Considerations
It is recommended that the anchor drill hole diameter be within 15 to 2 times the rock
anchor tendon diameter The anchor drill holes should be inspected by geotechnical
personnel and should be flushed clean prior to grouting A tremie pipe is recommended
to place grout from the bottom to top of the anchor holes
The geotechnical capacity of each rock anchor should be proof tested at the time of
construction More information on test procedures can be provided upon request
Compressive strength testing is recommended to be completed for the rock anchor
grout A set of grout cubes should be tested for each day grout is prepared
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 16
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
58 Pavement Structure
Where paved areas are considered for the project the recommended pavement
structures shown in Tables 4 through 6 would be applicable
Table 4 - Recommended Pavement Structure - Car Only Parking Areas
Thickness (mm) Material Description
50 Wear Course - HL-3 or Superpave 125 Asphaltic Concrete
150 BASE - OPSS Granular A Crushed Stone
300 SUBBASE - OPSS Granular B Type II
SUBGRADE - In situ soil or OPSS Granular B Type I or II material
placed over in situ soil
Table 5 - Recommended Pavement Structure
Access Lanes and Heavy Truck Parking Areas
Thickness (mm) Material Description
40 Wear Course - HL-3 or Superpave 125 Asphaltic Concrete
50 Binder Course - HL-8 or Superpave 190 Asphaltic Concrete
150 BASE - OPSS Granular A Crushed Stone
400 SUBBASE - OPSS Granular B Type II
SUBGRADE - In situ soil or OPSS Granular B Type I or II material
placed over in situ soil
Table 6 - Recommended Rigid Pavement Structure - Lowest Parking Level
Thickness
(mm)Material Description
150 32 MPa - C4 - Concrete
300 BASE - OPSS Granular A Crushed Stone
SUBGRADE - Existing imported fill or OPSS Granular B Type I or II material placed over
bedrock
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 17
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Minimum Performance Graded (PG) 58-34 asphalt cement should be used for this
project
If soft spots develop in the subgrade during compaction or due to construction traffic
the affected areas should be sub-excavated and replaced with OPSS Granular B
Type II material
The pavement granular base and subbase should be placed in maximum 300 mm thick
lifts and compacted to a minimum of 100 of the SPMDD with suitable vibratory
equipment noting that excessive vibration could lead to subgrade softening
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 18
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
60 Design and Construction Precautions
61 Foundation Drainage and Backfill
Water Suppression System
Where the proposed building is to have more than 2 underground parking levels the
following water suppression system is recommended to manage and control
groundwater water infiltration over the long term The water suppression system would
be installed for the exterior foundation walls and underfloor drainage and would consist
of the following (refer to Figure 4 - Water Suppression System in Appendix 2 for an
illustration of this system cross-section)
lsquo A concrete mud slab creating a horizontal hydraulic barrier to lessen the water
infiltration at the base of the excavation The thickness of the concrete mud slab
will be determined during the excavation program when realistic groundwater
infiltration can be properly assessed However for preliminary design purposes
it is recommended that the concrete mud slab be designed at a minimum
thickness of 150 mm
lsquo A waterproofing membrane to lessen the effect of water infiltration for the lower
underground parking level(s) starting at 6 m below finished grade The
waterproofing membrane will consist of a bentonite waterproofing such as
Tremco Paraseal or equivalent securely fastened to the temporary shoring
system or the vertical bedrock surface The membrane should extend to the
bottom of the excavation at the founding level and extend horizontally over the
concrete mud slab a minimum of 300 mm prior to the placement of the footings
Consideration can be given to doubling the bentonite waterproofing panels within
the lower portion of the underground parking levels where hydrostatic pressure
will be greater
Water infiltration will result from two sources The first will be water infiltration from the
upper 6 m which is above the vertical waterproofed area The second source will be
water breaching the waterproofing membrane
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 19
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Foundation Drainage
A composite drainage layer should be placed from finished grade to the bottom of the
foundation wall Where the proposed building is to have more than 2 underground
parking levels and the water suppression system is employed the composite drainage
layer should be placed between the waterproofing membrane and the foundation wall
It is recommended that the composite drainage system consist of DeltaDrain 6000
MiraDrain G100N or an approved equivalent It is expected that 150 mm diameter
sleeves placed at 3 m centres be cast in the foundation wall at the footing interface to
allow the infiltration of water to flow to an interior perimeter drainage pipe The
perimeter drainage pipe should direct water to the sump pit(s) within the lower
basement area
Underfloor Drainage
Underfloor drainage will be required to control water infiltration below the lowest
underground parking level slab For design purposes itrsquos recommended that 150 mm
diameter perforated pipes be placed at approximate 6 m spacing underlying the lowest
level floor slab The final spacing of the underfloor drainage system should be
confirmed at the time of completing the excavation when water infiltration can be better
assessed
Foundation Backfill
Above the bedrock surface backfill against the exterior sides of the foundation walls
should consist of free-draining non frost susceptible granular materials The greater
part of the site excavated materials will be frost susceptible and as such are not
recommended for re-use as backfill against the foundation walls unless used in
conjunction with a drainage geocomposite as recommended above connected to the
perimeter foundation drainage system Imported granular materials such as clean
sand or OPSS Granular B Type I granular material should otherwise be used for this
purpose
62 Protection of Footings Against Frost Action
Perimeter footings of heated structures are recommended to be protected against the
deleterious effects of frost action A minimum of 15 m of soil cover alone or a
combination of soil cover and foundation insulation should be provided
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 20
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Exterior unheated footings such as those for isolated exterior piers are more prone to
deleterious movement associated with frost action than the exterior walls of the
structure proper and require additional protection such as soil cover of 21 m or a
combination of soil cover and foundation insulation
It is expected that the parking garage will not require protection against frost action due
to the founding depth Unheated structures such as the access ramp may required to
be insulated against the deleterious effect of frost action A minimum of 21 m of soil
cover alone or a minimum of 06 m of soil cover in conjunction with foundation
insulation should be provided
63 Excavation Side Slopes and Temporary Shoring
Side Slopes
The excavation side slopes in the overburden above the groundwater level extending
to a maximum depth of 3 m should be excavated at 1H1V or shallower The shallower
slope is required for excavation below groundwater level The subsurface soils are
considered to be a Type 2 and 3 soil according to the Occupational Health and Safety
Act and Regulations for Construction Projects
As noted above excavation side slopes in sound bedrock can be carried out using
almost vertical side walls A minimum 1 m horizontal ledge should be left between the
bottom of the overburden excavation and the top of the bedrock surface to provide an
area to allow for potential sloughing or to provide a stable base for the overburden
shoring system
Excavated soil should not be stockpiled directly at the top of excavations and heavy
equipment should be kept away from the excavation sides
Slopes in excess of 3 m in height should be periodically inspected by the geotechnical
consultant in order to detect if the slopes are exhibiting signs of distress
A trench box is recommended to protect personnel working in trenches with steep or
vertical sides Services are expected to be installed by ldquocut and coverrdquo methods and
excavations should not remain open for extended periods of time
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 21
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Temporary Shoring
Temporary shoring may be required for the overburden soil to complete the required
excavations where insufficient room is available for open cut methods The shoring
requirements will depend on the depth of the excavation the proximity of the adjacent
buildings and underground structures and the elevation of the adjacent building
foundations and underground services
The temporary shoring system could consist of soldier pile and lagging system Any
additional loading due to street traffic construction equipment adjacent structures and
facilities etc should be included to the earth pressures described below These
systems can be cantilevered anchored or braced Generally it is expected that the
shoring systems will be provided with tie-back rock anchors to ensure the stability It
is further recommended that the toe of the shoring be adequately supported to resist
toe failure if required by means of rock bolts or extending the piles into the bedrock
through pre-augered holes if a soldier pile and lagging system is the preferred method
The earth pressures acting on the shoring system may be calculated with the following
parameters
Table 7 - Soil Parameters
Parameters Values
Active Earth Pressure Coefficient (Ka) 033
Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient (Kp) 3
At-Rest Earth Pressure Coefficient (Ko) 05
Dry Unit Weight (γ) kNm3 20
Effective Unit Weight (γ) kNm3 13
The active earth pressure should be calculated where wall movements are permissible
while the at-rest pressure should be calculated if no movement is permissible
The dry unit weight should be calculated above the groundwater level while the effective
unit weight should be calculated below the groundwater level
The hydrostatic groundwater pressure should be included to the earth pressure
distribution wherever the effective unit weight are calculated for earth pressures If the
groundwater level is lowered the dry unit weight for the soilbedrock should be used full
weight with no hydrostatic groundwater pressure component
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 22
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
For design purposes the minimum factor of safety of 15 should be calculated
Underpinning of Adjacent Structures
Based on the test pit completed at one of the adjacent building foundations and the
relatively shallow depth of the bedrock at the subject site it is expected that the
buildings along the southern boundary of the site are most likely founded on the
bedrock surface Therefore underpinning is not expected to be required for this
project
However Paterson should review the condition of the bedrock underlying the adjacent
building foundations at the time of construction to evaluate if bedrock stabilization is
required
64 Pipe Bedding and Backfill
A minimum of 150 mm of OPSS Granular A should be placed for bedding for sewer or
water pipes when placed on soilbedrock subgrade The bedding should extend to the
spring line of the pipe Cover material from the spring line to at least 300 mm above
the obvert of the pipe should consist of OPSS Granular A (concrete or PSM PVC pipes)
or sand (concrete pipe) The bedding and cover materials should be placed in
maximum 225 mm thick lifts compacted to a minimum of 95 of the SPMDD
Where hard surface areas are considered above the trench backfill the trench backfill
material within the frost zone (about 18 m below finished grade) should match the soils
exposed at the trench walls to reduce the potential differential frost heaving The trench
backfill should be placed in maximum 300 mm thick loose lifts and compacted to a
minimum of 95 of the SPMDD
65 Groundwater Control
It is anticipated that groundwater infiltration into the excavations should be controllable
using open sumps Pumping from open sumps should be sufficient to control the
groundwater influx through the sides of shallow excavations The contractor should be
prepared to direct water away from all bearing surfaces and subgrades regardless of
the source to prevent disturbance to the founding medium
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 23
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
Groundwater Control for Building Construction
A temporary Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks (MECP) permit to take
water (PTTW) may be required if more than 400000 Lday of ground andor surface
water are to be pumped during the construction phase At least 4 to 5 months should
be allowed for completion of the application and issuance of the permit by the MECP
For typical ground or surface water volumes being pumped during the construction
phase typically between 50000 to 400000 Lday it is required to register on the
Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) A minimum of two to four weeks
should be allotted for completion of the EASR registration and the Water Taking and
Discharge Plan to be prepared by a Qualified Person as stipulated under OReg 6316
If a project qualifies for a PTTW based upon anticipated conditions an EASR will not
be allowed as a temporary dewatering measure while awaiting the MECP review of the
PTTW application
Long-term Groundwater Control
Our recommendations for the proposed buildingrsquos long-term groundwater control are
presented in Section 61 Any groundwater encountered along the buildingrsquos perimeter
or sub-slab drainage system will be directed to the proposed buildingrsquos cisternsump pit
Due to the limited capacity of the existing sewers it is anticipated that pumped
groundwater can be temporarily contained within a cisternholding tank to permit
reduced discharge volumes if required Provided the proposed groundwater infiltration
control system is properly implemented where more than 3 underground parking levels
are built it is expected that groundwater flow will be low (ie- less than 3000 Lday)
with peak periods noted after rain events It is anticipated that the groundwater flow will
be controllable using conventional open sumps
Impacts on Neighbouring Structures
It is understood that where the underground levels extend below the groundwater level
(3 or more underground levels) the lower portion of the foundation will have a
groundwater infiltration control system in place Due to the presence of a groundwater
infiltration control system in place against the bedrock face in this scenario long-term
groundwater lowering is anticipated to be negligible for the area
Further based on our observations the groundwater level is anticipated at a 5 to 7 m
depth and located within the bedrock Therefore local groundwater lowering is not
anticipated under short-term conditions due to construction of the proposed building
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 24
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
The neighbouring structures are founded within native glacial till or directly over a
bedrock bearing surface based on available soils information within the area Due to
the current groundwater level noted to be within the bedrock no issues are expected
with respect to groundwater lowering that would cause long term damage to adjacent
structures surrounding the proposed building
66 Winter Construction
Precautions must be taken if winter construction is considered for this project
Where excavations are completed in proximity to existing structures they may be
adversely affected due to the freezing conditions In particular it should be recognized
that where a shoring system is constructed the soil behind the shoring system will be
subjected to freezing conditions and could result in heaving of the structure(s) placed
within or above frozen soil Provisions should be made in the contract document to
protect the walls of the excavations from freezing if applicable
In the event of construction during below zero temperatures the founding stratum
should be protected from freezing temperatures by the installation of straw propane
heaters and tarpaulins or other suitable means The base of the excavations should
be insulated from sub-zero temperatures immediately upon exposure and until such
time as heat is adequately supplied to the building and the footings are protected with
sufficient soil cover to prevent freezing at founding level
Trench excavations and pavement construction are difficult activities to complete during
freezing conditions without introducing frost in the subgrade or in the excavation walls
and bottoms Precautions should be considered if such activities are to be completed
during freezing conditions Additional information could be provided if required
67 Corrosion Potential and Sulphate
The results of analytical testing show that the sulphate content is less than 01 This
result is indicative that Type 10 Portland cement (normal cement) would be appropriate
for this site The chloride content and the pH of the sample indicate that they are not
significant factors in creating a corrosive environment for exposed ferrous metals at this
site whereas the resistivity is indicative of an moderate to aggressive corrosive
environment
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 25
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
70 Recommendations
A materials testing and observation services program is a requirement for the provided
foundation design data to be applicable The following aspects of the program should
be performed by the geotechnical consultant
lsquo Review of the geotechnical aspects of the excavating contractorrsquos shoring
design prior to construction
lsquo Review the bedrock stabilization and excavation requirements
lsquo Observation of all bearing surfaces prior to the placement of concrete
lsquo Sampling and testing of the concrete and fill materials used
lsquo Periodic observation of the condition of unsupported excavation side slopes in
excess of 3 m in height if applicable
lsquo Observation of all subgrades prior to backfilling
lsquo Field density tests to determine the level of compaction achieved
lsquo Sampling and testing of the bituminous concrete including mix design reviews
A report confirming that these works have been conducted in general accordance with
our recommendations could be issued upon request following the completion of a
satisfactory materials testing and observation program by the geotechnical consultant
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 26
patersongroup Geotechnical InvestigationOttawa Kingston North Bay Proposed Multi-Storey Building
2070 Scott Street - Ottawa
80 Statement of Limitations
The recommendations provided in this report are in accordance with our present
understanding of the project We request permission to review our recommendations
when the drawings and specifications are completed
A geotechnical investigation is a limited sampling of a site The recommendations are
based on information gathered at the specific test locations and can only be
extrapolated to an undefined limited area around the test locations Should any
conditions at the site be encountered which differ from those at the test locations
Paterson requests notification immediately in order to permit reassessment of the
recommendations
The present report applies only to the project described in this document Use of this
report for purposes other than those described herein or by person(s) other than
Westboro Point Developments Ltd or their agent(s) is not authorized without review by
Paterson Group for the applicability of our recommendations to the altered use of the
report
Paterson Group Inc
Richard Groniger C Tech July 26 2019
Scott S Dennis P Eng
Report Distribution
lsquo Westboro Point Developments Ltd (3 copies)
lsquo Paterson Group (1 copy)
Report PG4935-1July 26 2019 Page 27
APPENDIX 1
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA SHEETS
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA SHEETS BY OTHERS
SYMBOLS AND TERMS
UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTING RESULTS
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
602
1351
440
165137
025
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
(m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NUMBER
HOLE NO
Co
nstr
uctio
n
4
End of Borehole
(GWL 693m-April 4 2013)
1001
2
1
100
100
100
100
100
100
4
8
100
85
71
84
96
100
72
75
100RC
BEDROCK Grey limetone withintermittent dolostone and shale
BEDROCK Grey limestoneinterbedded with dolostone
BEDROCK Grey limestone
Fractured BEDROCK
FILL Brown silty sand with gravel
100mm Asphaltic concrete overcrushed stone
RC
RC
RC
2
RC
3
RC
RC
SS
AU
8
7
6
5RC
Remoulded
patersongroupGeotechnical Investigation
SAMPLE
BORINGS BY
Ottawa Ontario
STRATA PLOT
DEPTH50 mm Dia Cone
RECOVERY
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
GROUND SURFACE
(m)
Consulting
Undisturbed
Pen Resist Blows03m
CME 55 Power Auger BH 1
REMARKS
DATUM
20 40 60 80
Engineers
FILE NO
Prop Multi-Storey Building - 2070 and 2090 Scott St154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
6509
6409
6309
6209
6109
6009
5909
5809
5709
5609
5509
5409
5309
5209
PG2936
or RQD
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
SOIL DESCRIPTION
TYPE
Water Content
Shear Strength (kPa)20 40 60 80 100
DATE
ELEV
April 2 2013
N VALUE
0
1
2
3
NUMBER
HOLE NO
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
or RQD
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
Co
nstr
uctio
n
(m)
7
ELEV
N VALUE
TYPE
1
SS
SS
SS
AU
5
4
2FILL Brown silty clay with sandgravel trace glass
33
42
4
21
50+
12
483
318
259229
168
046
SS
150mm Asphaltic concrete overcrushed stone
End of Borehole
Practical refusal to augering at 318mdepth
(BH dry upon completion)
GLACIAL TILL Brown silty sandwith gravel trace cobbles andboulders
FILL Topsoil trace wood chips
FILL Brown silty sand iwth gravelcobbles trace boulders
FILE NO
Prop Multi-Storey Building - 2070 and 2090 Scott St
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
Engineers
Remoulded
Shear Strength (kPa)
Geotechnical Investigation
CME 55 Power Auger
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
GROUND SURFACE
(m)
Consulting
Pen Resist Blows03m
BH 2
RECOVERY
REMARKS
DATUM
20 40 60 80
patersongroup
Undisturbed
DATE
STRATA PLOT
DEPTH50 mm Dia Cone
Water Content
20 40 60 80 100
Ottawa Ontario
April 2 2013
PG2936
6377
6277
6177
6077
SOIL DESCRIPTION
BORINGS BY
SAMPLE
100
100100
100
71
100
90
86
100
1
2
3
41
29
8
6
50+75
71
67
46
Co
nstr
uctio
n
83
11
60
57
83
80
RC
End of Borehole
(GWL 527m-April 4 2013)
BEDROCK Black dolostoneinterbedded with limestone
BEDROCK Grey limestoneinterbedded with dolostone
BEDROCK Grey to blackdolostone interbedded with limestone
BEDROCK Grye limestone
FILL Brown silty sand with gravelcobbles trace boulders
FILL Topsoil
FILL Red-brown silty sand
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RCSS
SS
SS
AU25mm Asphaltic concrete overcrushed stone
721
3
4
5
6
7
1326
2
574
391
246
170145
060
Prop Multi-Storey Building - 2070 and 2090 Scott StGeotechnical Investigation
Remoulded
patersongroup
SAMPLE
BORINGS BY
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
GROUND SURFACE
(m)
Consulting
Undisturbed
Pen Resist Blows03m
FILE NO
BH 3
RECOVERY
REMARKS
DATUM
20 40 60 80
Engineers
CME 55 Power Auger
N VALUE
Ottawa Ontario
Shear Strength (kPa)
ELEV
or RQD
TYPE
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
(m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NUMBER
HOLE NO
DATE
STRATA PLOT
DEPTH50 mm Dia Cone
Water Content
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
20 40 60 80 100
April 2 2013
PG2936
6307
6207
6107
6007
5907
5807
5707
5607
5507
5407
5307
5207
5107
5007
SOIL DESCRIPTION
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
6
Shear Strength (kPa)
ELEV
TYPE
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
(m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NUMBER
HOLE NO
284
GROUND SURFACE
564
3
2
1
100
100
2
88
3
54
21
58
26
75
45
50+
53
100
RC
N VALUE
213
End of Borehole
(GWL 710m - May 22 2019)
BEDROCK Grey limestone
1
FILL Brown silty sand and gravel
831
RC
RC
RC
SS
SS
SS
AU
4
FILL Brown silty sand with crushedstone
Undisturbed
CME 55 Power Auger BH 4-19
SAMPLE
Consulting
(m)
patersongroup
RECOVERY
Ottawa Ontario
STRATA PLOT
BORINGS BY
50 mm Dia Cone
20 40 60 80 100
Pen Resist Blows03mDEPTH
6371
6271
6171
6071
5971
5871
5771
5671
5571
REMARKS
DATE 2019 May 15
PG4935
Geotechnical Investigation
SOIL DESCRIPTION
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
or RQD
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
DATUM
20 40 60 80
Remoulded
Engineers
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Co
nstr
uctio
n
FILE NO
2070 Scott Street
Water Content
Shear Strength (kPa)
767
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
ELEV
N VALUE
TYPE
GROUND SURFACE
013
11
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NUMBER
HOLE NO
100
2
1
3
2
1
100
100
221
100
5
24
46
38
73
56
52
39
3
100
RC
End of Borehole
(GWL 614m - May 22 2019)
BEDROCK Grey limestone
FILL Brown silty sand some claytrace brick
3
Asphaltic concrete
4RC
RC
RC
RC
SS
SS
AU
137
FILL Brown silty sand
BH 5-19BORINGS BY
RECOVERY
Consulting
SAMPLE
DATUM
20 40 60 80
patersongroupOttawa Ontario
(m)
STRATA PLOT
DEPTH50 mm Dia Cone
CME 55 Power Auger
Undisturbed
20 40 60 80 100
Pen Resist Blows03m
(m)
DATE 2019 May 15
PG4935
Engineers
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Geotechnical Investigation
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
or RQD
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
6334
6234
6134
6034
5934
5834
5734
5634
Water Content
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
FILE NO
2070 Scott Street
Co
nstr
uctio
n
REMARKS
Remoulded
HOLE NO
NUMBER
13
Shear Strength (kPa)
ELEV
TYPE
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
(m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GROUND SURFACE
64
1
3
2
1
100
100
98
100
4
25
74
85
60
64
20
50+
100
RC
775
213
End of Borehole
(GWL 582m - May 22 2019)
BEDROCK Grey limestone
2
RC
3RC
RC
RC
SS
SS
AU
5
FILL Brown silty sand and crushedrock some concrete
(m)
SAMPLE
Consultingpatersongroup
CME 55 Power Auger BH 6-19BORINGS BY
N VALUE
50 mm Dia Cone
Ottawa Ontario
STRATA PLOT
DEPTH
20 40 60 80 100
Pen Resist Blows03m
Geotechnical Investigation
DATE 2019 May 15
PG4935
6299
6199
6099
5999
5899
5799
5699
5599
SOIL DESCRIPTION
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
or RQD
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
Engineers
Remoulded
RECOVERY
Water Content
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
REMARKS
20 40 60 80
2070 Scott Street
Co
nstr
uctio
n
FILE NO
Undisturbed
DATUM
TBM - Top spindle of fire hydrant located on the west side of Churchill Avenuealong the west property line Geodetic elevation = 6618m
ELEV
Shear Strength (kPa)
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
Water Content
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6519
6419
PG2936
April 3 2013
1
20 40 60 80 100
Co
nstr
uctio
n
or RQD
G
Asphaltic concrete
FILL Crushed stone
FILL Brown silty sand with gravelcobbles trace boulders and topsoil
End of Test Pit
Practical refusal to excavation at162m depth
Concrete foundation wall foundeddirectly over bedrock surface at162m depth No footingencountered
(TP dry upon completion)
008
076
162
N VALUE
TYPE
HOLE NO
NUMBER
0
1
(m)
SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA
DATE
Engineers
20 40 60 80
DATUM
REMARKS
Prop Multi-Storey Building - 2070 and 2090 Scott St
TP 1Hydraulic Shovel
Pen Resist Blows03m
Undisturbed
Consulting
(m)
GROUND SURFACE Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
RECOVERY
FILE NO
BORINGS BY
Ottawa Ontario
SAMPLE
STRATA PLOT
DEPTH50 mm Dia Cone
patersongroup
Remoulded
Geotechnical Investigation
SYMBOLS AND TERMS
SOIL DESCRIPTION Behavioural properties such as structure and strength take precedence over particle gradation in
describing soils Terminology describing soil structure are as follows
Desiccated - having visible signs of weathering by oxidation of clay
minerals shrinkage cracks etc
Fissured - having cracks and hence a blocky structure
Varved - composed of regular alternating layers of silt and clay
Stratified - composed of alternating layers of different soil types eg silt
and sand or silt and clay
Well-Graded - Having wide range in grain sizes and substantial amounts of
all intermediate particle sizes (see Grain Size Distribution)
Uniformly-Graded - Predominantly of one grain size (see Grain Size Distribution)
The standard terminology to describe the strength of cohesionless soils is the relative density usually
inferred from the results of the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) lsquoNrsquo value The SPT N value is the
number of blows of a 635 kg hammer falling 760 mm required to drive a 51 mm OD split spoon
sampler 300 mm into the soil after an initial penetration of 150 mm
Relative Density lsquoNrsquo Value Relative Density
Very Loose lt4 lt15
Loose 4-10 15-35
Compact 10-30 35-65
Dense 30-50 65-85
Very Dense gt50 gt85
The standard terminology to describe the strength of cohesive soils is the consistency which is based on
the undisturbed undrained shear strength as measured by the in situ or laboratory vane tests
penetrometer tests unconfined compression tests or occasionally by Standard Penetration Tests
Consistency Undrained Shear Strength (kPa) lsquoNrsquo Value
Very Soft lt12 lt2
Soft 12-25 2-4
Firm 25-50 4-8
Stiff
Very Stiff
50-100
100-200
8-15
15-30
Hard gt200 gt30
SYMBOLS AND TERMS (continued)
SOIL DESCRIPTION (continued) Cohesive soils can also be classified according to their ldquosensitivityrdquo The sensitivity is the ratio between
the undisturbed undrained shear strength and the remoulded undrained shear strength of the soil
Terminology used for describing soil strata based upon texture or the proportion of individual particle
sizes present is provided on the Textural Soil Classification Chart at the end of this information package
ROCK DESCRIPTION The structural description of the bedrock mass is based on the Rock Quality Designation (RQD)
The RQD classification is based on a modified core recovery percentage in which all pieces of sound core
over 100 mm long are counted as recovery The smaller pieces are considered to be a result of closely-
spaced discontinuities (resulting from shearing jointing faulting or weathering) in the rock mass and are
not counted RQD is ideally determined from NXL size core However it can be used on smaller core
sizes such as BX if the bulk of the fractures caused by drilling stresses (called ldquomechanical breaksrdquo) are
easily distinguishable from the normal in situ fractures
RQD ROCK QUALITY
90-100 Excellent intact very sound
75-90 Good massive moderately jointed or sound
50-75 Fair blocky and seamy fractured
25-50 Poor shattered and very seamy or blocky severely fractured
0-25 Very poor crushed very severely fractured
SAMPLE TYPES
SS - Split spoon sample (obtained in conjunction with the performing of the Standard
Penetration Test (SPT))
TW - Thin wall tube or Shelby tube
PS - Piston sample
AU - Auger sample or bulk sample
WS - Wash sample
RC - Rock core sample (Core bit size AXT BXL etc) Rock core samples are
obtained with the use of standard diamond drilling bits
SYMBOLS AND TERMS (continued)
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
MC - Natural moisture content or water content of sample
LL - Liquid Limit (water content above which soil behaves as a liquid)
PL - Plastic limit (water content above which soil behaves plastically)
PI - Plasticity index (difference between LL and PL)
Dxx - Grain size which xx of the soil by weight is of finer grain sizes
These grain size descriptions are not used below 0075 mm grain size
D10 - Grain size at which 10 of the soil is finer (effective grain size)
D60 - Grain size at which 60 of the soil is finer
Cc - Concavity coefficient = (D30)2 (D10 x D60)
Cu - Uniformity coefficient = D60 D10
Cc and Cu are used to assess the grading of sands and gravels
Well-graded gravels have 1 lt Cc lt 3 and Cu gt 4
Well-graded sands have 1 lt Cc lt 3 and Cu gt 6
Sands and gravels not meeting the above requirements are poorly-graded or uniformly-graded
Cc and Cu are not applicable for the description of soils with more than 10 silt and clay
(more than 10 finer than 0075 mm or the 200 sieve)
CONSOLIDATION TEST
prsquoo - Present effective overburden pressure at sample depth
prsquoc - Preconsolidation pressure of (maximum past pressure on) sample
Ccr - Recompression index (in effect at pressures below prsquoc)
Cc - Compression index (in effect at pressures above prsquoc)
OC Ratio Overconsolidaton ratio = prsquoc prsquoo
Void Ratio Initial sample void ratio = volume of voids volume of solids
Wo - Initial water content (at start of consolidation test)
PERMEABILITY TEST
k - Coefficient of permeability or hydraulic conductivity is a measure of the ability of
water to flow through the sample The value of k is measured at a specified unit
weight for (remoulded) cohesionless soil samples because its value will vary
with the unit weight or density of the sample during the test
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
BHMW1
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
N5027060 E440905
9882 m
718 m btoc (April 11 2013)
9164 m (April 11 2013)
1315 m btoc
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Gravel (FILL)grey dry
Silty Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown trace organics dry
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
988870000
974871400
8538713500
NS NS NS NS NS
Co
ncre
teB
en
ton
ite
Sili
ca
Sa
nd
PV
C R
ise
rP
VC
Scre
en
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
CME 75 (hollow-stem augersNQ coring)
April 2 2013
David Kiar
003 m
020 m 008 m
Mike Grinnell
NotesSS = split spoon sampleppm = parts per millionm btoc = meters below top of casingm bgs = meters below ground surfaceNS = no environmental soil sampling performed
Elevation data based on Franz survey conducted relative to a temporary benchmark (top of yellow and blue fire hydrant on east side of Churchill Avenue North) that was assigned a relative elevation of 10000 m
MOE Well Cluster Tag No A140444
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BHMW2
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
N5027060 E440905
9873 m
707 m btoc (April 11 2013)
9167 m (April 11 2013)
1007 m btoc
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Sand and Gravel (FILL)greybrown dry to damp
some rockcobble fragments starting at approximately 18 m
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
988790000
966792200
8857910300
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
SS
SS
SS
SS
50
60
30
30
0
0
0
0
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
---
---
Co
ncre
teB
en
ton
ite
Sili
ca
Sa
nd
PV
C R
ise
rP
VC
Scre
en
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
CME 75 (hollow-stemNQ coring)
April 4 2013
David Kiar
003 m
020 m 008 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesSS = split spoon sampleppm = parts per millionm btoc = meters below top of casingm bgs = meters below ground surface
Elevation data based on Franz survey conducted relative to a temporary benchmark (top of yellow and blue fire hydrant on east side of Churchill Avenue North) that was assigned a relative elevation of 10000 m
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
BHMW3
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
N5027094 E440940
9685 m
520 m btoc (April 11 2013)
9165 m (April 11 2013)
965 m btoc
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Silty Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown trace organics dry to damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
969040000
947042200
8370413200
NS NS NS NS NS
Co
ncre
teB
en
ton
ite
Sili
ca
Sa
nd
PV
C R
ise
rP
VC
Scre
en
Ca
ve
-In
(N
ative
)
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
CME 75 (hollow-stemNQ coring)
April 4 2013
David Kiar
003 m
020 m 008 m
Mike Grinnell
NotesSS = split spoon sampleppm = parts per millionm btoc = meters below top of casingm bgs = meters below ground surfaceNS = no environmental soil sampling performed
Elevation data based on Franz survey conducted relative to a temporary benchmark (top of yellow and blue fire hydrant on east side of Churchill Avenue North) that was assigned a relative elevation of 10000 m
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH4
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Sand and Gravel (FILL)browngrey trace silt clay and cobble damp to moist
BedrockLimestone
End of Borehole
0000
1400
4-1
4-2
4-3
SS
SS
SS
30
50
0
0
0
---
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
--- No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
CME 75 (hollow-stem)
April 4 2013
David Kiar
NA
020 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesSS = split spoon sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH5
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Silty Sand and Gravel (FILL)browngrey some cobble dry to damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
1400
5-1
5-2
5-3
SS
SS
SS
40
30
0
0
0
---
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
--- No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
CME 75 (hollow-stem)
April 4 2013
David Kiar
NA
020 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesSS = split spoon sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH6
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown trace asphalt and brick debris trace silt and clay some cobble damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
2100
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-4
SS
SS
SS
SS
60
20
0
0
0
0
---
---
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
---
--- N
o M
on
ito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
CME 75 (hollow-stem)
April 4 2013
David Kiar
NA
020 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesSS = split spoon sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH7
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown trace silt and clay some cobble dry to damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
1500
7-1
7-2
7-3
CS
CS
CS
90
90
100
0
0
0
---
---
PHCs BTEX Metals
No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
Geoprobe 7822DT
April 5 2013
David Kiar
NA
009 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesCS = geoprobe core sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
BH8
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Interlock Brick
Silty Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown some cobble damp
Sandy Siltlight brown trace gravel damp to moist
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
2400
4600
8-1
8-2
8-3
8-4
8-5
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
50
50
60
50
95
0
0
0
0
0
---
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
---
---
No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
Geoprobe 7822DT
April 5 2013
David Kiar
NA
008 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesCS = geoprobe core sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH9
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Grass
Topsoildark brown organic damp
Sand and Gravelbrown trace silt and cobble damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
0600
2000
9-1
9-2
CS
CS
50
100
0
0
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
Geoprobe 7822DT
April 5 2013
David Kiar
NA
008 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesCS = geoprobe core sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH10
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Grass
Topsoildark brown organic damp
Silty Sand and Gravelbrown some cobble trace brick debris damp to moist
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
0600
2000
10-1
10-2
CS
CS
70
100
0
0
PHCs BTEX Metals
---
No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
Geoprobe 7822DT
April 5 2013
David Kiar
NA
008 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesCS = geoprobe core sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
3
BH11
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown some silt some cobble trace debris damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
2000
11-1
11-2
CS
CS
50
25
0
0
PHCs BTEX PAHs Metals
---
No
Mo
nito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
Geoprobe 7822DT
April 5 2013
David Kiar
NA
008 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesCS = geoprobe core sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
BOREHOLEMONITORING WELL BOREHOLE LOG
Project No
Project
Client
Borehole Location
TOC Elevation
Water Level
Water Level Elevation
Bottom of Well Depth
Drilled By
Drill Method
Drill Date
Logged by
Well Pipe Diameter
Borehole Diameter
Checked by
Sheet 1 of 1
Franz Environmental Inc 329 Churchill Avenue North Ottawa Ontario K1Z 5B8 infofranzenvironmentalcom
SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
Sym
bol
DescriptionE
levation (
m)
Depth
(m
bgs)
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Recovery
Org
anic
Vapour
Measure
ments
(ppm
)
Lab Analyses
Well CompletionDetails
Depth
(m
)
0
1
2
BH12
2471-1301
Phase II ESA 2070-2074 amp 2090 Scott Street Ottawa ON
EJSpa Corporation
NA
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
NA (borehole only)
Ground Surface
Asphalt
Sand and Gravel (FILL)brown some silt and cobble trace debris dry to damp
Bedrocklimestone
End of Borehole
0000
1700
12-1
12-2
CS
CS
50
25
150
0
PHCs BTEX PAHs Metals
--- N
o M
on
ito
rin
g W
ell
Insta
lled
George Downing Estate Drilling Ltd
Geoprobe 7822DT
April 5 2013
David Kiar
NA
008 m
Mike Grinnell
1 of 1
NotesCS = geoprobe core sampleppm = parts per millionm bgs = meters below ground surface
patersongroup
Consulting Engineers
154 Colonnade Road South Ottawa Ontario K2E 7 J5
Phone (613) 226-7381 Fax (613) 226-6344
CLIENT Slengora Limited co Cleland Jardine Engineering FILE No PG2936
ADDRESS 472 Tillbury Avenue REPORT No 1
PROJECT 2070 amp 2090 Scott Street DATE 03-Apr-13
STRUCTURE TYPE amp LOCATION Rock Cores
CORE DATA AND TESTING RESULTS
Lab No 63136M 63136M
Core No 1 2
Location BH1 BH3
RC8 RC8
Nominal MSA(mm)
Date Cast
Date Cored
Date Tested 03-Apr-13 03-Apr-13
(D) Ave Diameter (mm) 4600 4600
(H) Height (mm) 880 895
(W) Weight (g) 4158 4173
(A) Area = πD24 (mm
2) 16619 16619
(V) Volume = A X H 1000 (cm3) 1462 1487
Unit Weight = W V x1000 (kgm 2843 2806
Capped Height(mm) 880 895
H D ratio 191 195
Correction factor (k) 0992 0995
(L) Load (lbs) 46900 23900
Mpa = L x 4448222 A 1255 640
MPa (corrected) 1245 637
Direction of Loading
Curing Conditions
REMARKS
Core No1 Depth 39 8 to 40 0
Core No2 Depth 40 6 to 40 10
DISTRIBUTION TECHNICAL
PERSONNEL
TECHNICIAN G Brown
VERIFIED BY S Brown
APPROVED BY Stephen J Walker P Eng
ROCK CORE
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
Certificate of AnalysisClient
Report Date 08-Apr-2013Order Date3-Apr-2013
Client PO 13998 Project Description PG2936Paterson Group Consulting Engineers
Order 1314147
Client ID BH3-SS2 - - -Sample Date ---02-Apr-13
1314147-01 - - -Sample IDMDLUnits Soil - - -
Physical Characteristics
Solids ---91001 by Wt
General Inorganics
pH ---777005 pH Units
Resistivity ---290010 Ohmm
Anions
Chloride ---275 ugg dry
Sulphate ---1065 ugg dry
Page 3 of 7
APPENDIX 2
FIGURE 1 - KEY PLAN
FIGURES 2 AND 3 - SEISMIC SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY PROFILES
FIGURE 4 - GROUNDWATER SUPPRESSION SYSTEM
DRAWING PG4935-1 - TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 1
KEY PLAN
SITE
patersongroup
patersongroup
Figure 2 ndash Shear Wave Velocity Profile at Shot Location 24 m
patersongroup
Figure 3 ndash Shear Wave Velocity Profile at Shot Location -1 m
BH 26377(6059)
S C O T T S T R E E T
W I
N O
N A
A
V E
N U
E
CH
UR
CH
ILL
AV
ENU
E N
OR
TH
FH-TBM
BH 3MW 36307[6061]
280
250240
115
-10-20
-50
1
4
8
12
16
20
24
10m
TYP
TP 16519(6357)
BH 1-1 BH 3-1
BH 4-1BH 1
BH 3
BH 4
TP 1
TP 4
BH 2
BH 2-1
BH 5
TP 3 TP 5
TP 2
BH5
BH4
MW2BH7BH8
BH11
BH6
BH12
BH10
BH9BH 1MW 16509[6372]
BH 4-196371[6087]
BH 6-196299[6086]
BH 5-196334[6113]
OTTAWA ONTARIO
consulting engineerspaterson
NO REVISIONS DATE INITIAL
WESTBORO POINT DEVELOPMENTS LTD
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
2070 SCOTT STREET
TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN
PG4935-1
1250
Title
Scale
Drawn by
Checked by
group
pau
tocad
draw
ingsg
eotec
hnica
lpg4
9xxp
g493
5-1 t
hlpdw
g
0
SCALE 1250
1 2 3 4 5 10 15m
154 Colonnade Road South
Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J5
Tel (613) 226-7381 Fax (613) 226-6344
Approved by
Revision No
MPG
SD
DJG
062019
Date
Report No
PG4935-1
Dwg No
0
0
LEGEND
BOREHOLE WITH MONITORING WELL LOCATION CURRENT INVESTIGATION
BOREHOLE LOCATION PATERSON GROUP REPORT PG2936 2013
BOREHOLE WITH MONITORING WELL LOCATION PATERSON GROUPREPORT PG2936 2013
TEST PIT LOCATION PATERSON GROUP REPORT PG2936 20136
BOREHOLE LOCATION JDPA REPORT E2283 2002
TEST PIT LOCATION JDPA REPORT E2883 2002
BOREHOLE LOCATION JDPA REPORT E1381 1996
BOREHOLE LOCATION BY OTHERS MARCH 2013
MONITORING WELL LOCATION BY OTHERS MARCH 2013
6509 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION (m)
[6372] BEDROCK SURFACE ELEVATION (m)
(6337) PRACTICAL REFUSAL TO AUGERINGEXCAVATION ELEV (m)
GEOPHONE LOCATIONS
20 GEOPHONE NUMBER
SHOT LOCATION
TBM - TOP SPINDLE OF FIRE HYDRANT GEODETIC ELEVATION = 6618m
115