Upload
cooper
View
68
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ECIV 542 CLASS PROJECT. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY. BLOSSOM AT PICKENS. Omor Sharif Muchun Song Narges Kaveshgar Quyen Pham Chih -Yao Lin. Table of Contents. Introduction. 1. Intersection characteristics. 2. Proposed improvement. 3. Conclusion. 4. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY
ECIV 542 CLASS PROJECT
BLOSSOM AT PICKENS
Omor SharifMuchun SongNarges KaveshgarQuyen PhamChih-Yao Lin
2010.11.29
Table of Contents
Introduction1
Intersection characteristics2
Proposed improvement3
Conclusion4
2010.11.29
Introduction
Why improvement? Past design can’t fit in current situation
Where to improve? Blossom @ Pickens
2010.11.29
Intersection Characteristics
Downtown Columbia35mph
30mph
C=134Y=3R=2
2010.11.29
Data Collection & Analysis
JAMAR Traffic CounterSynchro 6
2010.11.29
JAMAR & Synchro Report
2010.11.29
Level of Service Criteria – Signalized Intersections (TRB, HCM2000)
LOS SecondsDelay/Vehicle Description
A ≤10 Most vehicles do not stop at all.
B >10 and ≤20 More vehicles stop than for LOS A.
C >20 and ≤35 The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many pass through without stopping.
D >35 and ≤55 Many vehicles stop. Individual cycle failures are noticeable
E >55 and ≤80 Considered being the limit of acceptable delay. Individual
F >80 Unacceptable delay.
2010.11.29
Proposed Improvements
Increase lane widthIncrease lane width on minor St. from 10’ -> 12’ (insignificant)
Right turn channelization Introduce channelized right turns with yield control on minor St.(LOS: E->D)
Additional lanesProvide an additional travel lane to minor street.(LOS: E->D)
Signal Timing Optimization Use Synchro-suggested (62,64) phase than current (80,54) (LOSM: E->F; LOSm: F->D)
2010.11.29
Conclusion
Improvement of this intersection is neededMore aspects should be considered (safety, cost)
ECIV 542 CLASS PROJECT
Omor SharifMuchun SongNarges KaveshgarQuyen PhamChih-Yao Lin
2010.11.29
Reference
1. Intersections Improvements Study, Prepared for the City of Piqua Ohio, January 2009, Kleingers & Associates, Inc.2. Oldham county intersection improvement study report oldham county, Kentucky, December 2006, DLZ Kentucky, Inc.3. Intersection Improvement Study Hendricks County Road 100 South & Dan Jones Road Avon, Indiana, November 2003, DLZ Indiana, LLC4. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of transportation, Washington DC, December 2009.
2010.11.29
Reference (continued)
5. Highway Capacity Manual, 4th Edition, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, 20006. A policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington DC, 2004. 7. Traffic Engineering, 4th Edition, R. P. Roess, E. S. Prassas and W. R. McShane, Prentice Hall New Jersey, 2008. 8. SYNCHRO 6, Synchro plus SimTraffic User Guide, Trafficware Ltd., www.trafficware.com