24
1 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Steven R. Singer, DDS [email protected] THE OBJECTIVES OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Reveal pathology Reveal the anatomic truth IDEAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING STUDY Provides desired diagnostic yield Low risk to the patient Minimal cost Convenient to dentist and patient LIMITATIONS… Inherent properties of x-rays Projectional nature of conventional imaging Misrepresentation Shadow casting What is the problem?

Shadow casting

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Shadow casting

1

Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Steven R. Singer, [email protected]

THE OBJECTIVES OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

Reveal pathology

Reveal the anatomic truth

IDEAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING STUDY

Provides desired diagnostic yield

Low risk to the patient

Minimal cost

Convenient to dentist and patient

LIMITATIONS…

Inherent properties of x-rays

Projectional nature of conventional imaging

Misrepresentation

Shadow casting

What is the problem?

Page 2: Shadow casting

2

Plenty!Distortion in panoramic radiographsSuperimposition of overlying structuresInaccurate measurementsInaccurate anatomical relationshipsInability to visualize the Z axis

Intra-oral radiography

Panoramic radiography

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Page 3: Shadow casting

3

The internal structure of an object can be reconstructed from multiple projections of the object

Basic principle of CT

Advantages of CT

Elimination of superimposition of structuresImproved contrast resolution

1% difference in physical density differences v 10% difference in conventional films

Multiplanar reformatted imageThis means that data can be viewed in either coronal, axial, or sagital planes

History

Announced by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1972Initially called Computerized Axial Transverse ScanningUsed a narrowly collimated, moving x-ray beam with a scintillation crystal detector.Resultant analog image was digitized and reconstructed by computer algorithm Able to detect soft tissue differences with greater sensitivity than conventional images

Sir Godfrey Hounsfield

Stereopticon Stereopticon

Page 4: Shadow casting

4

Buccal Object Rule The EMI Brain Scanner

Early CT Images Basics

Computerized Tomography, or CT is the preferred current terminology.

Don’t call it a CAT scan!

The Z axis Image data

Hounsfield Unit - specific to each pixel is the average of all density measurements for that pixelScan Field of View: Area within the gantry from which raw data is acquired.Small: 25cm - headMedium : 35 cm- chestLarge : 42-50 cm- abdomen

Page 5: Shadow casting

5

Image data….

The display field of view and the matrix determine the pixel size.The entire scan circle or a portion of the circle may be selected to display on the monitor.Pixel Size = Field of view / Matrix size

Radiation dose distribution

DensityThe displayed image is an array of pixels. The displayed density is proportional to the attenuation characteristics of that voxelEach pixel is assigned a CT number. The CT number is also known as Hounsfield Units, in honor of Sir Godfrey Hounsfield.The scale ranges from -1000 (air) to 0 (water) to +1000 (dense bone)

Hounsfield Units

Getting the right imageBecause we cannot see the difference between 2000 different shades of grey it would be pointless to produce an image which covered the whole range of Hounsfield numbers. In order to produce a useful image of the area of interest a system of windowing and levels is used.

WindowingThe available grey scale is spread over the chosen range of Hounsfieldnumbers. The window defines the upper and lower limits of this range. To produce an image which shows up most major structures a large window is used. For more detailed information about tissues with very similar density a small window is used. The smaller the window the more detailed the image but the range of tissue density that is seen is reduced

LevelsThe level is the Hounsfield number at the centre of the window. This is chosen so that the window covers the type of tissue you are interested in. To image dense tissues a high level is used and to image low density tissues a low level is used.

www.elp.manchester.ac.uk/.../Hounsfield.GIF

Hounsfield Units Hounsfield Units

www.elp.manchester.ac.uk/.../Hounsfield.GIF

Page 6: Shadow casting

6

Hounsfield Units

This image was produced with a window of 1000HU at level -700HU

This image was produced with a window of 500HU at level +50HU

www.elp.manchester.ac.uk/.../Hounsfield.GIF

Window width and window levels

and width/level

Decreasing the Window Width increases the contrast in the image so it is good for looking at differences in soft tissues e.g. brain tissue 50-400 HUIncreasing the Window Width allows structures with a large pixel range (i.e. bones and lungs) to be viewed. 400-2000 HUDecreasing the Window Level allows the lungs and airways to be viewed.Increasing the Window Level allows the denser bonesto be viewed.DUAL WINDOW SETTINGS OR DOUBLE WINDOW SETTING

and width/level

50-400 HU 400-2000 HU

Window width Window width

Windowing: Residual cyst with squamous cell carcinoma

Soft Tissue Window Bone Window

Basics

The basic approach is that of a x-ray tube emitting a thin, fan-shaped beam in the direction of an array of detectors. These are either scintillation detectors or ionization chambers.Different arrangements call for simultaneous movement of the source and detectors, or the source only may revolve around the patient to acquire the images.

Page 7: Shadow casting

7

Rotate only

Rotate-rotate3rd Generation

4th Generation

Adapted From White & Pharoah 5th edition

Current Generation Scanners BasicsThird generation scanners are called Incremental Scanners, since the final image set contains a series of contiguous or overlapping imagesThe current generation of scanners provides a helical or spiral scan. The patient is moved through the gantry as the images are exposed. This creates a continuous spiral of data.

Terminology

Continuous acquisition scanningSpiral scanning -Siemens®

Helical scanning-GE®

Adapted From White & Pharoah 5th edition

Basics

Benefits of spiral scanning including:Decreased acquisition time (12 seconds v 5 minutes)Improved multiplanar reconstructionsDecreased dose to patient

Basics

The CT image is a computer reconstruction of multiple imagesA scan consists of a 360 degree rotation around the patient.There may be projections at each 1/3 degree of rotation. This will give a total of 1080 projections.The image is displayed in a series of voxels (volume elements)

Page 8: Shadow casting

8

Basics

The flat image is displayed as 0.1 mm squares called pixels (picture elements)The depth of each voxel is determined by the collimation of the beam, both at the tube head and the detector array. The voxel depth is analogous to the image layer (or focal trough) in a panoramic radiograph

MEDICAL CTVS

CONE-BEAM CT

Medical CT Medical CT

Cone-beam CT Cone-beam CT

Cone-shaped x-ray beam

Page 9: Shadow casting

9

Cone beam CT Cone beam CT

Cone shaped beam

One flat panel sensor

Advantages/disadvantages over Medical CT

Less radiation

Lower cost

Fixed imaging volume

Limited to head and neckI-CAT (Imaging Sciences)

Cone Beam CT Cone Beam CT

Page 10: Shadow casting

10

Cone Beam CT Cone Beam CT

Cone Beam CT

MULTI-PLANAR REFORMATTING

PlanesMulti-planar reformatting

Axial image/slice

Page 11: Shadow casting

11

Multi-planar reformatting

Coronal (frontal) image/slice

Multi-planar reformatting

Sagittal image/slice

Axial imaging

Axial imaging Axial imaging

Page 12: Shadow casting

12

Axial imaging Axial imaging

Axial imaging Axial imaging

Coronal (frontal) imaging Coronal (frontal) imaging

Page 13: Shadow casting

13

Coronal (frontal) imaging Coronal (frontal) imaging

Pre-implant assessment

TMJ hard tissue assessment

Oral cancer F/U

Trauma

Other

CBCT applications

Impactions

Impactions

Impactions Impactions

Page 14: Shadow casting

14

Impactions 3D applications

Orthodontic applications

Courtesy Dr D. Hatcher

Facial asymmetry

Orthodontic applications

Courtesy Dr D. Hatcher

Facial asymmetry

Orthodontic applications

Courtesy Dr D. Hatcher

Facial asymmetry

Orthodontic applications

Courtesy Dr D. Hatcher

Facial asymmetry

Page 15: Shadow casting

15

TMJ evaluation TMJ evaluation

Courtesy

Dr D. Hatcher

TMJ evaluation

Courtesy Dr D. Hatcher

Trauma

Trauma Trauma

Page 16: Shadow casting

16

Trauma

Pre-implant assessment

No shadows of surroundingstructures

Evaluation of bone height,width and bone quality

Variable slice thicknessand multiplanar imaging

Streaking artifacts

Higher radiation to the patient

Not readily available

(+) (-)

High contrast resolution

No magnification

Best imaging of the vital structures

Computed tomography

Is cross-sectional imaging necessary?

“Clinical observation and palpation have been proven to be inadequate for the estimation of thewidth of the ridge”… (Beeman 1989)

Presence of undercuts, especially in completely edentulous patients

Anatomical structures of interest, especiallythe mandibular canal do show better (Stella and Tharanon 1990)

Bone density estimation (with CT)

Page 17: Shadow casting

17

Identify the proposed implant sites:

RADIOGRAPHIC TEMPLATES

Radiographic guides

Radiographic guides

“Hollowed out” guides

Radiographic guides

Radiographic guides Radiographic guides

Clear acrylic templates

Markers (metal or gutta-percha)

Page 18: Shadow casting

18

Radiographic guides Radiographic guides

Radiographic guides

Radiographic guides Radiographic guides

Page 19: Shadow casting

19

Radiographic guides

Remove gutta-perchamarkers

Radiographic guides

Immediately after completion of surgery

Page 20: Shadow casting

20

1 week after surgery

Alveolar ridge variation

Alveolar ridge variation

Alveolar ridge variation

Alveolar ridge variation

Mental foramen

Page 21: Shadow casting

21

Mental foramen Mental foramen

Lingual foramen Accessory lingual foramina

Bisphosphonate ONJ

Page 22: Shadow casting

22

Bisphosphonate ONJ Bisphosphonate ONJ

Radiation exposure

INTERPRETATION

Extraction of meaningful information, explanation….

Webster’s dictionary

Page 23: Shadow casting

23

Case 4

Thank you!

Page 24: Shadow casting

24

Thanks to:

Christos Angelopoulos DDS, MS

Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Imaging

Columbia University College of Dental Medicine

For the use of slides and images