Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SHA Revision
Classifications of Health Financing Schemes (ICHA-HF)
Chapter 7
SHA Expert Advisory Meeting of Health Accounts Experts
Paris, 14-15 June, 2010
1
Purpose of the discussion
• Final confirmation of the main concept of Financing Schemes (supported at the 2009 Meeting of Health Accounts experts and WHO regional consultations)
• Review of the amendments in some categories of ICHA-HF
• Confirmation of the interpretation of “public” vs “private”
• Identifying additional work, if necessary
2
Requirements for the accounting tools for health financing
• To improve the analytical power of SHA
– different needs of countries / current vs. future needs
• To improve the comparability of health expenditure data
– together with other elements of SHA 2.0
• To ensure feasibility of regular data reporting
– current vs. future possibilities
3
Growing expectation from policy analysts
• Who gets what and how? How are the resources raised?
• How the particular health care services or goods are financed. (HC x HF table];
• What kinds of services are ensured (purchased) under the different financing schemes? [HC x HF table];
• How the resources of the different financing schemes are allocated among the different groups of beneficiaries, such as different groups of diseases [Beneficiaries x HF table];
• “Where does the money go to?” *HP x HF table+;
• How a particular health financing scheme (sub-system) collects its revenues (Financing sources) [HF x FS tables];
Stating point: What basic information should HF classification provide?
What information is provided by the three basic tables?
• How much is spent on types of care (HC) and paid to providers under the different financing sub-systems, such as compulsory insurance, voluntary insurance and paid by OOP, etc.- regardless of what institutional units carry out the payment
HF
HC
HP
Main problems with the ICHA-HF categories under
SHA 1.0
• Ambiguity of the definitions of HF categories (schemes vs. institutional units)
– E.g., Mixing scheme and institutional unit in one category (“private insurance enterprises (other than social insurance”)
– JHAQ uses both terms: “agents /schemes”
• Do not reflect adequately the complex and changing systems of health financing, e.g.
– private insurance enterprise can manage both compulsory and voluntary insurance (e.g., Netherlands)
– compulsory insurance can be managed by two different types of institutional units (e.g., Slovakia)
SHA 2.0: main components of accounting health financing
• Key concepts and definitions
• Tools proposed for international data collection
– Classifications
– Accounts (allocation of resources; revenue-raising)
– Key indicators
• Optional tools justified by
– different needs and capacity of countries
– future analytical needs
SHA 2.0 proposes the following key concepts
• Health financing schemes as the main “ building blocks” of a country’s health financing systems (Financing arrangements, for example, social health insurance, voluntary health insurance) (Chapter 7)
• Financing sources: Types of revenues of health financing schemes (For example, social insurance contributions, grants, etc. ) (Chapter 8)
• Financing agents: institutional units managing health financing schemes (For example, social insurance agencies, private insurance companies) (Annex)
Proposed framework
Institutional
Units
Financing Sources (Types of revenues)
(FS)
Financing schemes (HF)
Financing agents
Providers (HP)
Functions (HC)
Current framework
Financing sources (FS) Financing agents / schemes (HF)
Functions (HC)
Providers (HP)
10
Key concepts
SHA 2.0 SHA 1.0 / PG
HF: Health Financing Schemes
(e.g., social health insurance,
voluntary health insurance)
HF: Health care financing (SHA 1.0)
HF: Source of funding (SHA 1.0)
HF: Financing Agent (PG)
FA: Financing Agent
(institutional units realizing
/managing financing schemes:
e.g., insurance company)
FS: Financing Sources
(Revenues of Health Financing
Schemes, e.g., insurance
contribution, insurance fee, etc)
FS: Financing Sources defined as
institutional units (PG, JHAQ)
11
Classifications
SHA 2.0 SHA 1.0 / PG / JHAQ
ICHA-HF
Classification of Health Financing
Schemes
(Part 1 - already included in the
international data collection)
ICHA-HF
Classification of Health Care
Financing (SHA 1.0)
Classification of Financing Agents
(PG)
JHAQ: Financing agents/ schemes
ICHA-FS
Classification of Financing Sources
(Revenues of Health Financing
Schemes)
(Part1 or Part 2???)
ICHA-FS
Classification of Financing Sources
(PG, JHAQ) defined as institutional
units
ICHA-FA
Classification of Financing Agents
(Annex? optional tool)
Definition of health financing schemes
• Health financing schemes are the main sub-systems / components of a country’s health financing system.
• Include: direct payments by households for services and goods and third-party financing arrangements.
• Third party financing schemes are distinct bodies of rules, governing the – mode of participation in the scheme,
– the basis for entitlement to health care and
– the rules of raising and pooling revenues of the given sub-system.
(To put is simple: Rules over who gets what and how it is financed)
12
An example: financing schemes and institutional units
Financing schemes Institutional units (Financing agents)
Central government
Social security funds
Insurance corporations
Non-profit Institutions
Households
Governmental schemes (programs)
Compulsory social insurance
Voluntary private insurance
Foreign aid programmes
Out-of-pocket payments
Health financing schemes are managed by one or more institutional units, but are not themselves institutional units
Definition of Financing Agents
• A financing agent is an institutional unit involved in the management of one or more financing schemes.
• It may collect revenues, pay for (purchase) services under the given health financing scheme(s), and be involved in the management and regulation of health financing.
• For example: local government, social insurance agency, insurance company, etc.
14
Definition of Financing Sources
• Financing sources are the revenues of health financing schemes received / collected from institutional units of the economy.
• The revenue is an increase in the funds of health financing schemes, through specific contribution mechanisms.
• The categories of financing sources are the particular types of revenues of health financing schemes (e.g., social insurance contributions, grants, voluntary transfers, etc.).
15
Questions for discussion
• Q7ai) Are they (HF, FA, FS) clearly defined?
• Q7aii) Is this an adequate starting point for the three classifications HF, FS, and FA?
• Q7aiii)Which definition would require further improvement?
16
Criteria for defining the categories of Financing Schemes
• Mode of participation (mandatory vs volutary)
– Eligibility defined by law, with mandatory or voluntary enrolment
– Discretion of private actors
• Benefit entitlement (based on contributions)
– Citizenship or Entitlement related to certain social characteristics
– Contribution payment / Obligation to by insurance
– Discretion of private actors (inc. RoW)
– Willingness to pay
• Basic method for fund-raising
• Mechanism and extent of pooling funds 17
Q7bi) Do you consider the main proposed categories of ICHA-HF appropriate?
HF.1 Governmental schemes and compulsory health insurance
HF.1.1 Governmental schemes (with sub-categories )
HF.1.2 Compulsory health insurance scheme
HF.1.2.1 Social health insurance
HF.1.2.2 Compulsory private health insurance
HF.2 Voluntary private health care payment schemes
HF.2.1 Voluntary health insurance (with sub-categories)
HF.2.2 NPISHs- financing schemes
HF.2.3 Enterprises financing schemes (other than employer-based insurance)
HF.3 Households out-of-pocket payment (with sub-categories)
HF.4 Rest of the World financing schemes (with sub-categories)
18
19
What are the main differences at the 1st level categories?
Characteristics of financing schemes
HF.1: Governmental schemes and compulsory health insurance
- aimed at ensuring access to basic health care for the whole society / large part / vulnerable groups
HF.2: Voluntary private health care payment schemes
- pre-paid arrangements; -private initiatives; -access to care is based on discretion of private actors.
HF.3: Household out-of-pocket payment
- households’ direct payment at the time of the use of services
HF.4: Rest of the world funded schemes
- resources are provided by RoW, - separate budget and management for the use of funds
20
Mode of
participation
Benefit
entitlement
Basic method for
fund-raising
HF.1.1.
Governmental
schemes
automatic for all
citizens/residents;
or eligibility is
defined by
regulation for a
specific group of
population (e.g.,
the poor
universal or
available for a
specific group of
population
defined by law
Budget revenues
(primarily taxes)
Additional
revenues: foreign
revenues
Voluntary domestic
revenues
Structure of HF: Table 7.3 and Criteria-tree
21
Mode of
participation
Benefit
entitlement
Basic method for
fund-raising
HF.1.2.1 Social
health insurance
usually compulsory
for the eligible
groups. In some
cases, however, the
law defines the
eligible group(s),
but the enrolment is
voluntary
entitlement based
on contribution
payment by or on
behalf of the
insured person
(individual contract
is not required)
Non-risk related
health insurance
contribution. The
insurance contribution
may be paid by the
government (from the
state budget) on behalf
of some non-
employed groups of
population
HF.1.2.2
Compulsory
private
insurance
All residents (or
defined groups of
residents) are
obliged to purchase
a health insurance
policy
based upon a
contract between
the individual and
the selected health
insurance company
(or other agency
involved)
Health insurance
premiums. Tax credits
may also be involved
22
Mode of
participation
Benefit entitlement Basic method for fund-
raising
HF.2.1
Voluntary private
health insurance
voluntary based upon the
purchase of
voluntary health
insurance policy
(usually on the
basis of a contract)
usually non-income
related premium (often
directly or indirectly
risk-related
HF.2.2
Non-profit
Institutions
financing
schemes
voluntary discretionary donations from the
general public,
governments (budget
of national government
or foreign aid) or
corporations
HF.2.3
Enterprise
financing
schemes (other
than employer-
based insurance)
based on
employment at a
particular
corporation or
employment
status in general
Type of services:
discretion of the
corporation or
specified by law
revenues of the
enterprise
23
HF.2.1 Voluntary Private health insurance
schemes HF.2.1.1 Primary /substitutory health insurance
schemes HF.2.1.1.1 Employer-based insurance (other than
enterprises schemes) HF.2.1.1.2
Community-based insurance HF.2.1.1.3
Other primary coverage schemes HF.2.1.2
Complementary / supplementary
insurance schemes
Sub-categories of voluntary private insurance
24
Mode of
participation
Benefit
entitlement
Basic method for
fund-raising
HF.3
Household
out-of-pocket
expenditure
Discretion of the
household
individual
willingness to
pay
Voluntary domestic
revenues from
households
HF.4
RoW
financing
schemes
voluntary criteria set by
foreign entities
Foreign revenues
25
HF.3
Household out-of-pocket payment
HF.3.1 Out-of-pocket excluding cost sharing
HF.3.2
Cost sharing with third-party payers
HF.3.2.1
Cost sharing with government schemes
and compulsory insurance schemes
HF.3.2.2 Cost sharing with voluntary insurance
schemes
Sub-categories of OOP
26
Memorandum items
Governmental schemes and compulsory
health insurance together with cost
sharing (HF.1 + HF.3.2.1)
Voluntary health insurance schemes
together with cost sharing (HF.2.1+
HF.3.2.2)
Questions for discussion
• Q7bii)Are there any financial arrangements of countries that cannot be brought under any of these categories?
• Q 7ci)) Do you consider the categories of ICHA-HF clearly defined?
• Q7cii) Which of the definitions would require
further improvement?
27
“Public” versus “private”
The use of the terms is often ambiguous:
• For example, WHO PG define social insurance contribution paid by households as “private fund” and tax paid by households is “public fund” (which is obviously not appropriate)
• What is meat by “public” vs “private”
– Institutional units providing revenues?
– Contribution mechanisms?
– Financing arrangements?
28
“Public” versus “private”
Proposed interpretations (both are relevant – depending on the analytical puprose)
1) From the perspective of financing schemes
– Public and compulsory private expenditure ; and
– Voluntary private expenditure
2) From the perspective of compulsory versus voluntary contribution mechanisms
– Public and compulsory private funds spent on health care and
– Voluntary private funds spent on health care
29
30
Financing schemes Major expenditure aggregates
HF.1 Governmental financing schemes and
compulsory health insurance Expenditure by government
schemes and compulsory
health insurance
(Or: public and compulsory private
expenditure)
HF.1.1 Governmental financing schemes
HF.1.2.1 Social health insurance
HF.1.2.2 Compulsory private health insurance
HF.2 Voluntary private health care
payment schemes (other than OOP)
Voluntary Private expenditure
HF.2.1 Voluntary private health insurance
HF.2.2 NPISHs-financing schemes
HF.2.3 Enterprises financing schemes
HF.3 Households out-of-pocket payment
HF.4 Rest of the World financing
programmes
Health spending from public, compulsory private and private funds
31
Revenues of financing schemes Major expenditure aggregates
FS.1.1.1
Tax revenues allocated to governmental schemes
Public funds spent on health care
FS.1.1.2
Social insurance contributions paid by the government
FS.1..1.3 Other transfers from government
FS.1.2 Social insurance contributions
FS.2 Compulsory private Insurance premiums
Compulsory private funds spent on health care
FS.3 Voluntary private Insurance premiums Private funds spent on health care
FS.4
Voluntary domestic transfers (other than grants)
FS.6 Other revenue (not elsewhere classified)
Financing health services vs gross fixed capital formation
• For example, a CT may be bought by a hospital or local government (as owner of the hospital), while the CT examinations may be paid by social insurance, voluntary insurance and OOP.
• Financing Schemes distinguishes the different ways of access to services. It concerns the final consumption of health services and goods.
• The financing of GFCF concerns the payment for production factors of health services and goods. The purchasers of infrastructure, equipment, software, etc. are the providers or the owners of health care institutions. Therefore, Classification of Providers (economic units) is the most suitable to account the financing of GFCF.
32
Optional tools (Annex)
• Classification of Financing Agents: ICHA-FA
• Optional tables
– HF x FA; HC x HF x FA; HP x HF x FA
– Expenditure by diseases, age and gender and Health Financing Schemes
• Sectoral accounts – accounting balance / deficit
33
Is the implementation feasible?
• ICHA- HF
– the proposed changes are in accordance with solutions in national data reporting (e.g., Netherlands, Slovakia)
– several countries: changes required only in the names of categories
• Implementation of optional tools
– Depends on countries’ needs and capacity
34
• ADDITIONAL SLIDES
35
36
HF.2.2 NPISHs financing schemes
HF.2.2.1 Resident foreign government
development agencies schemes
HF.2.2.2 Other non profit (e.g., NGO) schemes
HF.2.3 Enterprises financing schemes
HF.2.3.1 Enterprises (except Health care
providers) financing schemes
HF.2.3.2 Health care providers financing
schemes
37
HF.4 Rest of the world financing schemes (non
resident)
HF.4.1 Compulsory schemes (non-resident)
HF.4.1.1 Compulsory health insurance schemes (non-
resident)
HF.4.1.2 Other schemes
HF.4.2 Voluntary private schemes (non-resident)
HF.4.2.1 Voluntary health insurance schemes (non-
resident)
HF.4.2.2 Other schemes
HF.4.2.2.1 Philanthropy / international NGOs schemes
HF.4.2.2.2 Foreign development agencies schemes
HF.4.2.2.3
Schemes of Enclaves (e.g., international
organizations or embassies)
SHA 2.0 vs. SHA 1.0
38
Revised ICHA-HF SHA Manual (current Version 1.0) HF.1
Governmental schemes and compulsory insurance (regardless the institutional unit managing the scheme)
HF.1 General government (institutional unit)
HF.1.1 Government financing schemes
HF.1.1 General government (excluding social security funds)
HF.1.2
Social health insurance scheme (regardless the institutional unit managing the scheme)
HF.1.2 Social security funds (institutional unit)
HF.1.3
Compulsory private insurance
SHA 2.0 vs. SHA 1.0
39
HF.2 Private sector
HF.2 Voluntary private health care payment schemes (other than OOP)
HF.2.1 Voluntary private health insurance
HF.2.1.1 Primary insurance coverage schemes
HF.2.1 Private social insurance
HF.2.1.1.1
Employer-based insurance HF.2.2 Private insurance enterprises (defined as institutional unit)
HF.2.1.1.2 Community-based insurance HF.2.1.1.3 Other primary coverage
schemes HF.2.1.2 Complementary voluntary
insurance schemes HF.2.2
NPISHs financing schemes HF.2.4 NPISHs (other than social insurance)
HF.2.3 Enterprises financing schemes HF.2.5
Corporations (other than health insurance)
SHA 2.0 vs. SHA 1.0
40
Revised ICHA-HF
SHA Manual (current Version 1.0)
HF.3 Household out-of-pocket payment
HF.2.3 Private household out-of-pocket expenditure
HF.3.1 Out-of-pocket excluding cost sharing
HF.2.3.1 Out-of-pocket excluding cost sharing
HF.3.2 Cost sharing: Government schemes and compulsory health insurance
HF.2.3.2 Cost sharing: central government
HF.3.3 Cost sharing: voluntary schemes
HF.2.3.3 Cost sharing: State /provincial government
HF.2.3.5 Cost sharing: Social security funds
HF.2.3.7 Cost sharing: other private l insurance
HF.2.3.9 All other Cost sharing
HF.4 Rest of the world funded schemes
HF.3 Rest of the world
Definition of financing agent
• A financing agent is an institutional unit managing one or more financing schemes: collects revenues and / or purchases services under rules of the given health financing scheme(s).
– Included are households as financing agent for out-of-pocket payments.
41
42
Classification of Financing Agents (ICHA-FA) FA.1. General Government FA.1.1 Central government
FA.1.1.1 Ministry of Health FA.1.1.2 Other Ministries and public units (belonging to central
government) FA.1.1.3 National Health Service Agency FA.1.1.4 National Health Insurance Agency
FA.1.2 State /Regional / Local government FA.1.3 Social insurance funds FA.1.9 All other general government units FA.2 Insurance corporations FA.2.1 Commercial insurance companies FA.2.2 Mutual and other non-profit insurance organisations FA.3 Corporations (other than insurance corporations) FA.3.1 Health management and provider corporations FA.3.2 Corporations (other than providers of health services) FA.4 Non-profit Institutions serving households (NPISHs) FA.5 Households
FA.6 Rest of the World FA.6.1 International organisations FA.6.2 Foreign governments FA.6.3 Other foreign entities
Accounting for the different roles of government
44
HF.1 and HF.2: Main differences compared to the current ICHA-HF
Revised ICHA-HF Current ICHA-HF
HF.1 Financing schemes aimed at ensuring access to basic care for the whole / majority (or most vulnerable groups) of society Regardless whether managed by government units or private enterprises
General Government Institutional units of government and social security funds on all levels of government
HF.2 Voluntary schemes Regardless whether managed by government units or private enterprises
Private sector All institutional units which do not belong to the government
Financing scheme Financing agent County
A
Country
B
HF.1.1
Government funded schemes
(programs ) total 30 5
FA. Ministry of Health 20
Other Ministries 5
NPISHs 5
HF.1.2 Compulsory social insurance total 60
FA.1.4 social security funds 40
FA.3 private insurance companies 20
HF.2.1 Voluntary private insurance total 5 10
FA.3 private insurance companies 5 8
FA.1.4 social security funds 2
HF.3
Households out-of-pocket
payment
FA.4
Households 50 25
HF.4 Foreign aid programmes total 15
FA.5 NPISHs (Domestic) 5
FA.1.3 government units 5
FA.5 Foreign NGOs 5
Example: Health expenditure by financing schemes and financing agents (optional
table)
Examples for indicators: revenue collection and pooling
• Share of domestic revenues of Government to current expenditure & gross capital formation
• Share of grants from international organisations in revenues of government funded schemes
• Share of foreign voluntary transfers in revenues of government funded schemes / NGOs health programmes
• Share of government funded schemes (programs), compulsory social insurance, compulsory private insurance, voluntary health insurance, out-of-pocket payments and other private schemes in total current expenditure
46
Examples for indicators: allocation of resources
Current expenditure by compulsory social insurance (on key healthcare functions)
– Current expenditure by compulsory social insurance, executed by social security agency
– Current expenditure by compulsory social insurance, executed by for-profit insurance companies
• Expenditure on prevention by government funded schemes
– Expenditure on prevention by government funded schemes, executed by local governments
– Expenditure on prevention by government funded schemes, executed by NGOs
47
Financing scheme Financing agent
Inp
atie
nt
se
rvic
es
Me
dic
al
go
od
s
Pre
ve
nti
on
Ad
min
ist
ratio
n
HC.I HC.5 HC.6 HC.7
HF.1.
1
Government
funded schemes
(programs)
IS.1.2 Local
government units
HC.6x HF.1.1
x IS.1.2
IS.5
NGOs
HC.6x HF.1.1
x IS.5
HF.1.
2
Compulsory
social insurance
IS.1.4 Social security
funds HC.Ix HF.1.2
X IS.1.4
IS.3 Private insurance
companies HC.Ix HF.1.2
X IS.3
HF.4
Foreign aid
programs)
IS.5
NGOs
HC.6.x HF.4.
x IS.5
IS.1.3 Government
units
IS.6
Foreign NGOs
HC.6.x HF.4.
x IS.6
Health expenditure by function, financing schemes and financing agent (extract) (optional table)
Allocation of resources (purchasing): What information is provided by SHA?
How much is spent on
- main types of services & goods (HCxHF);
- main disease or beneficiaries categories, or
- to main types of providers (HPxHF)
under the particular financing schemes;
(Optional tools): What institutional units (financing agents) carry out the „purchasing” under the particular financing schemes (HFxFA; HFxFAxHC; HFxFAxHP)
49