Upload
narayanan-subramanian
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
1/7
Rewards and
Recognition Programs
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
2/7
The Economic Theory of Incentives
Agency theory• Employee is averse to efort• Employee is averse to risk• Parties cannot contract on level o efort as employer is risk averse and its
di cult to monitor
Incentive plans are used to
• Screen and Sort• Rewarding the type and quality o efort• Benchmarking and tournaments
Challenges of
• nterdependency Pro!lem" #he $i culty in paying employees !ased on
individual per ormance when multiple people impact per ormance%• #he &ontrolla!ility Pro!lem" #he inherent issue in linking compensation o
a person to events !eyond his'her control• #he Alignment Pro!lem" &hallenge o avoiding distortionary efects o
individual pay plans in an environment where employees per orm multipletasks%
• Ratchet efect
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
3/7
Best Laid Incentive Plans
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
4/7
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
5/7
%easures Employees( Response
Response to the customer within81 hours o opening $on=t open the email
ndividual achievement in R>$ Race in ?ling patents andcopyrights /which may not !ecommercially via!le2
Budgeting nnovation @ pro ect does not gothrough
&ommission on actual sale amountand not 9RP or present and e)*employees%
Sales people treated e)isting andretired employees poorly
4eadcount reduction •
esta!lished territories5n time shipping •
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
6/7
%% recognition ?nal recognition cameron over usti?cation efect%pd
Page 88
)ver*usti+cation Efects
'tudy ! #he over*usti+cation e,ect occurs when ane)pected e)ternal incentive such as money or priCesdecreases a personDs intrinsic motivation to per orm atask%
'tudy -$rawing activities o children"• #he +o* award group•
#he une)pected award group• #he e)pected award group* per ormance ell signi?cantly
6ndermining childrenDs intrinsic interest 3ith e)trinsic reward" A test o the over usti?cation hypothesis !y
9ark r%
8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work
7/7
Reward Ine6uity3 The Case of Capuchin %on$
9onkeys re ect unequal pay !y Sarah (% Brosnan > (rans B% 9% de
3aal
• &ondition o Equality and nequality• (ood and Efort &ontrol