Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    1/7

    Rewards and

    Recognition Programs

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    2/7

    The Economic Theory of Incentives

    Agency theory• Employee is averse to efort• Employee is averse to risk• Parties cannot contract on level o efort as employer is risk averse and its

    di cult to monitor

    Incentive plans are used to

    • Screen and Sort• Rewarding the type and quality o efort• Benchmarking and tournaments

    Challenges of

    • nterdependency Pro!lem" #he $i culty in paying employees !ased on

    individual per ormance when multiple people impact per ormance%• #he &ontrolla!ility Pro!lem" #he inherent issue in linking compensation o

    a person to events !eyond his'her control• #he Alignment Pro!lem" &hallenge o avoiding distortionary efects o

    individual pay plans in an environment where employees per orm multipletasks%

    • Ratchet efect

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    3/7

    Best Laid Incentive Plans

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    4/7

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    5/7

    %easures Employees( Response

    Response to the customer within81 hours o opening $on=t open the email

    ndividual achievement in R>$ Race in ?ling patents andcopyrights /which may not !ecommercially via!le2

    Budgeting nnovation @ pro ect does not gothrough

    &ommission on actual sale amountand not 9RP or present and e)*employees%

    Sales people treated e)isting andretired employees poorly

    4eadcount reduction •

    esta!lished territories5n time shipping •

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    6/7

    %% recognition ?nal recognition cameron over usti?cation efect%pd

    Page 88

    )ver*usti+cation Efects

    'tudy ! #he over*usti+cation e,ect occurs when ane)pected e)ternal incentive such as money or priCesdecreases a personDs intrinsic motivation to per orm atask%

    'tudy -$rawing activities o children"• #he +o* award group•

    #he une)pected award group• #he e)pected award group* per ormance ell signi?cantly

    6ndermining childrenDs intrinsic interest 3ith e)trinsic reward" A test o the over usti?cation hypothesis !y

    9ark r%

  • 8/9/2019 Session 2 Reward and Recognition Programs Dont Work

    7/7

    Reward Ine6uity3 The Case of Capuchin %on$

    9onkeys re ect unequal pay !y Sarah (% Brosnan > (rans B% 9% de

    3aal

    • &ondition o Equality and nequality• (ood and Efort &ontrol