20
1 SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19 Report date: 20 th August 2019 Start date: 4 th July 2019 Stop date: 21 st July 2019 Number of invitees: 106 Number of responses: 18 Invitee response rate: 16% Student Satisfaction % Description 75%-100% Provides high quality educational experiences over time with action plans in place for minor problems. 40%-<75% Provides some quality experiences, but overall below the expected standard. 0%-<40% Consistently below the expected standard. Requires significant improvement. Please note: Overall satisfaction is calculated using the number of 'positive responses' received per site. A positive response is a rating of ‘Above average’, ‘Good’ or ‘Excellent’ on the Likert scale. Central site No. of responses Royal Free 6 UCLH 5 Whittington 7 DGH No. of responses Barnet 3 Basildon 2 Lister 1 Luton & Dunstable 3 North Middlesex 3 Queen’s 4 Watford 2 UCL Medical School Quality Assurance Unit

SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

1

SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3

2018-19 Report date: 20th August 2019 Start date: 4th July 2019 Stop date: 21st July 2019 Number of invitees: 106 Number of responses: 18 Invitee response rate: 16%

Student Satisfaction % Description

75%-100% Provides high quality educational experiences over time with action plans in place for minor problems.

40%-<75% Provides some quality experiences, but overall below the expected standard.

0%-<40% Consistently below the expected standard. Requires significant improvement.

Please note: Overall satisfaction is calculated using the number of 'positive responses' received per site. A positive response is a rating of ‘Above average’, ‘Good’ or ‘Excellent’ on the Likert scale.

Central site No. of responses

Royal Free 6

UCLH 5

Whittington 7

DGH No. of responses

Barnet 3

Basildon 2

Lister 1

Luton & Dunstable 3

North Middlesex 3

Queen’s 4

Watford 2

UCL Medical School Quality Assurance Unit

Page 2: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

2

No. of responses

(n=18)

Overall satisfaction 94%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 1

Below average 0

Above average 2

Good 13

Excellent 2

N/A 0

Total 18

How would you rate Module 5A overall?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 3: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

3

No. of responses

(n=18)

Overall satisfaction 89%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 1

Below average 0

Above average 6

Good 8

Excellent 1

N/A 2

Total 18

How would you rate Core Teaching Week?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 4: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

4

Royal Free

(n=6) UCLH (n=5)

Whittington (n=7)

Overall satisfaction 83% 100% 86%

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage

Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Royal Free UCLH Whittington

Site/Rating Very poor

Poor Below

average Above

average Good Excellent N/A Total

Royal Free 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 6

UCLH 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 5

Whittington 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 7

Total 0 0 2 3 7 6 0 18

How would you rate your Paediatrics placement (Central site)?

Page 5: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

5

0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10

Royal Free

Take histories 2 2 1

Examine patients 3 1 1

Present cases 3 2

UCLH

Take histories 2 2

Examine patients 3 1

Present cases 2 2

Whittington

Take histories 2 2

Examine patients 2 1 1

Present cases 4

How many times per week, on average, did you do the following

during your Paediatrics placement (Central site)?

Page 6: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage

Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Barnet Basildon Lister Luton & Dunstable North Middlesex Queen's Watford

Barnet (n=3)

Basildon (n=2)

Lister (n=1)

Luton & Dunstable

(n=3)

North Middlese

x (n=3)

Queen’s (n=4)

Watford (n=2)

Overall satisfaction

67% 0% 100% 100% 67% 50% 50%

Site/Rating Very poor

Poor Below

average Above

average Good Excellent N/A Total

Barnet 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3

Basildon 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Lister 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Luton & Dunstable 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3

North Middlesex 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3

Queen’s 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4

Watford 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

Total 1 2 4 4 4 3 0 18

How would you rate your Paediatrics placement (DGH)?

Page 7: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

7

0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10

Barnet

Take histories 1 2

Examine patients 1 2

Present cases 1 2

Basildon

Take histories 1 1

Examine patients 1 1

Present cases 1 1

Lister

Take histories 1

Examine patients 1

Present cases 1

Luton & Dunstable

Take histories 1 1

Examine patients 1 1

Present cases 1 1

North Middlesex

Take histories 1

Examine patients 1

Present cases 1

Queens

Take histories 1 1

Examine patients 2

Present cases 2

Watford

Take histories 1

Examine patients 1

Present cases 1

How many times per week, on average, did you do the following

during your Paediatrics placement (DGH)?

Page 8: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

8

Royal Free

(n=6) UCLH (n=5)

Whittington (n=7)

Overall satisfaction 83% 100% 100%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage

Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Royal Free UCLH Whittington

Site/Rating Very poor

Poor Below

average Above

average Good Excellent N/A Total

Royal Free 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 6

UCLH 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 5

Whittington 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 7

Total 0 0 1 3 11 3 0 18

How would you rate your Dermatology teaching?

Page 9: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

9

0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10

Royal Free

Take histories 3 1

Examine patients 2 1 1

Present cases 2 2

UCLH

Take histories 3

Examine patients 1 2

Present cases 3

Whittington

Take histories 2 1 1

Examine patients 1 2 1

Present cases 2 2

How many times per week, on average, did you do the following

during your Dermatology teaching?

Page 10: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

10

Paediatrics (Central site)

(n=15) Paediatrics (DGH)

(n=15) Dermatology

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 80% 93% 40%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage

Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Paediatrics (Central site) Paediatrics (DGH) Dermatology

Placement Very poor

Poor Below

average Above

average Good Excellent N/A Total

Paediatrics (Central site) 0 0 3 1 6 5 0 15

Paediatrics (DGH) 0 0 1 3 7 4 0 15

Dermatology 2 4 3 2 2 2 0 15

Total 2 4 7 6 15 11 0

How would you rate your experience of being able to take histories from

patients during the following placements?

Page 11: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

11

Paediatrics (Central site)

(n=15) Paediatrics (DGH)

(n=15) Dermatology

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 87% 87% 67%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage

Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Paediatrics (Central site) Paediatrics (DGH) Dermatology

Placement Very poor

Poor Below

average Above

average Good Excellent N/A Total

Paediatrics (Central site) 1 0 1 1 6 6 0 15

Paediatrics (DGH) 0 0 2 3 6 4 0 15

Dermatology 0 1 4 5 3 2 0 15

Total 1 1 7 9 15 12 0

How would you rate your experience of being able to examine patients during

the following placements?

Page 12: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

12

Paediatrics (Central site)

(n=15) Paediatrics (DGH)

(n=15) Dermatology

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 87% 73% 27%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage

Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Paediatrics (Central site) Paediatrics (DGH) Dermatology

Placement Very poor

Poor Below

average Above

average Good Excellent N/A Total

Paediatrics (Central site) 0 0 2 3 3 7 0 15

Paediatrics (DGH) 0 1 3 5 2 4 0 15

Dermatology 2 1 8 2 1 1 0 15

Total 2 2 13 10 6 12 0

How would you rate your experience of being able to discuss your

management planning and clinical reasoning during the following

placements?

Page 13: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

13

No. of responses

(n=18)

Overall satisfaction 78%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 1

Poor 0

Below average 3

Above average 7

Good 3

Excellent 4

N/A 0

Total 18

How would you rate Child and adolescent mental health (CAMH)?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 14: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

14

No. of responses

(n=18)

Overall satisfaction 69%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 2

Poor 0

Below average 2

Above average 6

Good 3

Excellent 0

N/A 5

Total 18

How would you rate the Pathology teaching?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 15: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

15

No. of responses

(n=18)

Overall satisfaction 100%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 0

Below average 0

Above average 4

Good 9

Excellent 3

N/A 2

Total 18

How would you rate the Ethics and law teaching?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 16: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

16

No. of responses

(n=18)

Overall satisfaction 100%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 0

Below average 0

Above average 3

Good 7

Excellent 2

N/A 6

Total 18

How would you rate the Advanced Communication Skills teaching?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 17: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

17

No. of responses

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 93%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 1

Below average 0

Above average 0

Good 8

Excellent 6

N/A 0

Total 15

How would you rate the access to computer/IT/library resources?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 18: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

18

No. of responses

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 80%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 1

Below average 2

Above average 2

Good 7

Excellent 3

N/A 0

Total 15

How would you rate the quality of the feedback you received on the

assessment?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 19: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

19

No. of responses

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 93%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 0

Below average 1

Above average 3

Good 7

Excellent 4

N/A 0

Total 15

How would you rate the module as an educational experience?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses

Page 20: SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 3 2018-19€¦ ·

20

No. of responses

(n=15)

Overall satisfaction 87%

Rating No. of responses

Very poor 0

Poor 0

Below average 2

Above average 3

Good 4

Excellent 6

N/A 0

Total 15

How would you rate the module in terms of your clinical experience?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A

No

. of

resp

on

ses