Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SEQ Report Year 5 Module B Block 1
2018-19 Report date: 3 January 2019 Start date: 6 December 2018 Stop date: 23 December 2018 Number of invitees: 106 Number of responses: 50 Invitee response rate: 47%
Student Satisfaction % Description
75%-100% Provides high quality educational experiences over time with action plans in place for minor problems.
40%-<75% Provides some quality experiences, but overall below the expected standard.
0%-<40% Consistently below the expected standard. Requires significant improvement.
Please note: Overall satisfaction is calculated using the number of 'positive responses' received per site. A positive response is a rating of ‘Above average’, ‘Good’ or ‘Excellent’ on the Likert scale.
Central site No. of responses
Royal Free 18
UCLH 14
Whittington 18
DGH No. of responses
Barnet 7
Basildon 5
Lister 7
Luton & Dunstable 9
North Middlesex 11
Queen’s 5
Watford 6
UCL Medical School Quality Assurance Unit
2
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 98%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 1
Above average 4
Good 32
Excellent 13
N/A 0
Total 50
How would you rate Module 5B overall?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
3
How would you rate Core Teaching Week?
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 90%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 5
Above average 27
Good 17
Excellent 1
N/A 0
Total 50
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
4
How would you rate the Clinical skills teaching?
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 98%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 1
Below average 0
Above average 2
Good 17
Excellent 30
N/A 0
Total 50
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
5
Royal Free
(n=18) UCLH (n=14)
Whittington (n=18)
Overall satisfaction 94% 86% 83%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Royal Free UCLH Whittington
Site/Rating Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Royal Free 1 0 0 3 10 4 0 18
UCLH 0 1 1 3 6 3 0 14
Whittington 1 0 2 7 8 0 0 18
Total 2 1 3 13 24 7 0 50
How would you rate your O&G placement (Central site)?
6
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Royal Free
Take histories 0 1 5 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 4 2 0 0 0
Present cases 0 6 0 0 0 0
UCLH
Take histories 1 3 3 0 0 0
Examine patients 1 4 2 0 0 0
Present cases 1 6 0 0 0 0
Whittington
Take histories 0 6 1 1 0 0
Examine patients 0 6 1 1 0 0
Present cases 1 5 2 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following
during your O&G placement (Central site)?
7
Royal Free
(n=18) UCLH (n=14)
Whittington (n=18)
Overall satisfaction 78% 86% 82%
0
2
4
6
8
10
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Royal Free UCLH Whittington
Site/Rating Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Royal Free 0 0 4 3 8 3 0 18
UCLH 0 0 2 8 2 2 0 14
Whittington 0 0 3 7 5 2 1 18
Total 0 0 9 18 15 7 1 50
How would you rate your Breast Surgery placement?
8
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Royal Free
Take histories 2 2 1 0 0 1
Examine patients 0 2 0 0 3 1
Present cases 3 2 0 0 1 0
UCLH
Take histories 3 2 2 0 0 0
Examine patients 1 1 3 0 1 1
Present cases 3 4 0 0 0 0
Whittington
Take histories 1 5 2 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 5 3 0 0 0
Present cases 2 6 0 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following
during your Breast Surgery placement?
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Barnet Basildon Lister Luton & Dunstable North Middlesex Queen's Watford
Barnet (n=7)
Basildon (n=5)
Lister (n=7)
Luton & Dunstable
(n=9)
North Middlesex
(n=11)
Queen’s (n=5)
Watford (n=6)
Overall satisfaction
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 100%
Site/Rating Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Barnet 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7
Basildon 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 5
Lister 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 7
Luton & Dunstable 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9
North Middlesex 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 11
Queen’s 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 5
Watford 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6
Total 0 0 1 5 9 35 0 50
How would you rate your O&G placement (DGH)?
10
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Barnet
Take histories 0 0 1 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 1 0 0 0 0
Present cases 0 1 0 0 0 0
Basildon
Take histories 0 1 1 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 1 0 1 0 0
Present cases 0 1 1 0 0 0
Lister
Take histories 0 1 0 1 1 0
Examine patients 0 1 1 1 0 0
Present cases 0 1 1 0 1 0
Luton & Dunstable
Take histories 0 1 4 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 2 3 0 0 0
Present cases 0 3 2 0 0 0
North Middlesex
Take histories 0 0 4 0 1 0
Examine patients 0 3 2 0 0 0
Present cases 0 4 1 0 0 0
Queens
Take histories 0 1 2 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 1 1 1 0 0
Present cases 0 2 1 0 0 0
Watford
Take histories 0 2 0 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 2 0 0 0 0
Present cases 0 2 0 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following during
your O&G placement (DGH)?
11
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 70%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 3
Poor 3
Below average 9
Above average 16
Good 14
Excellent 5
N/A 0
Total 50
Overall, how would you rate your Urology placement?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
12
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 89%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 3
Above average 10
Good 12
Excellent 3
N/A 22
Total 50
How would you rate your Urology placement (Royal Free)?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
13
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 68%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 2
Poor 4
Below average 6
Above average 13
Good 10
Excellent 2
N/A 13
Total 50
How would you rate your Urology placement (Westmoreland Street)?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
14
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 85%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 2
Above average 3
Good 7
Excellent 1
N/A 37
Total 50
How would you rate your Urology placement (Whittington)?
02468
10121416182022242628303234363840
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
15
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Royal Free
Take histories 5 5 1 0 0 0
Examine patients 5 6 0 0 0 0
Present cases 7 3 1 0 0 0
Westmoreland Street
Take histories 8 5 1 0 0 0
Examine patients 5 6 3 0 0 0
Present cases 10 4 0 0 0 0
Whittington
Take histories 3 3 0 0 0 0
Examine patients 3 2 1 0 0 0
Present cases 3 3 0 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following
during your Urology placement?
16
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 98%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 1
Above average 5
Good 17
Excellent 27
N/A 0
Total 50
How would you rate your GUM/HIV placement?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
17
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Take histories 0 8 9 0 1 0
Examine patients 3 7 8 0 0 0
Present cases 2 11 5 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following
during your GUM/HIV placement?
18
0123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
O&G (Central) Breast O&G (DGH) Urology (RF) Urology (West) Urology (Whit) GUM/HIV
O&G
(Central) (n=40)
Breast Surgery (n=40)
O&G (DGH) (n=39)
Urology (Royal Free)
(n=40)
Urology (Westmoreland
St) (n=40)
Urology (Whittington)
(n=40)
GUM/HIV (n=40)
Overall satisfaction 78% 67% 97% 45% 27% 38% 93%
Placement Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
O&G (Central site) 1 1 7 6 19 6 0 40
Breast Surgery 1 3 9 6 13 7 1 40
O&G (DGH) 0 0 1 4 14 20 0 39
Urology (Royal Free) 0 3 9 4 5 1 18 40
Urology (Westmoreland St) 4 6 12 4 4 0 10 40
Urology (Whittington) 0 1 4 1 2 0 32 40
GUM/HIV 0 0 3 7 14 16 0 40
Total 6 14 45 32 71 50 61 279
How would you rate your experience of being able to take histories from
patients during the following placements?
19
0123456789
10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
O&G (Central) Breast O&G (DGH) Urology (RF) Urology (West) Urology (Whit) GUM/HIV
O&G
(Central) (n=39)
Breast Surgery (n=39)
O&G (DGH) (n=39)
Urology (Royal Free)
(n=39)
Urology (Westmoreland
St) (n=39)
Urology (Whittington)
(n=39)
GUM/HIV (n=39)
Overall satisfaction 79% 90% 97% 54% 30% 38% 78%
Placement Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
O&G (Central site) 1 2 5 5 15 11 0 39
Breast Surgery 0 0 4 4 9 22 0 39
O&G (DGH) 0 0 1 4 19 15 0 39
Urology (Royal Free) 0 3 8 5 5 3 15 39
Urology (Westmoreland St) 5 4 12 6 2 1 9 39
Urology (Whittington) 0 1 4 2 0 1 31 39
GUM/HIV 0 3 5 8 12 9 2 39
Total 6 13 39 34 62 62 57 273
How would you rate your experience of being able to examine patients during
the following placements?
20
0123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
O&G (Central) Breast O&G (DGH) Urology (RF) Urology (West) Urology (Whit) GUM/HIV
O&G
(Central) (n=39)
Breast Surgery (n=39)
O&G (DGH) (n=39)
Urology (Royal Free)
(n=39)
Urology (Westmoreland
St) (n=39)
Urology (Whittington)
(n=39)
GUM/HIV (n=39)
Overall satisfaction 87% 81% 100% 75% 47% 50% 97%
Placement Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
O&G (Central site) 0 2 3 4 19 11 0 39
Breast Surgery 0 0 7 8 14 8 2 39
O&G (DGH) 0 0 0 3 14 22 0 39
Urology (Royal Free) 0 1 4 5 7 3 19 39
Urology (Westmoreland St) 3 4 9 7 3 4 9 39
Urology (Whittington) 0 1 4 1 4 0 29 39
GUM/HIV 0 0 1 5 16 16 1 39
Total 3 8 28 33 77 64 60 273
How would you rate your experience of being able to discuss your
management planning and clinical reasoning during the following
placements?
21
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 92%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 1
Poor 2
Below average 1
Above average 11
Good 17
Excellent 17
N/A 1
Total 50
How would you rate the Leadership day?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
22
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 70%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 3
Poor 1
Below average 10
Above average 15
Good 15
Excellent 3
N/A 3
Total 50
How would you rate the Pathology teaching?
0
5
10
15
20
25
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
23
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 96%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 2
Above average 8
Good 11
Excellent 29
N/A 0
Total 50
How would you rate the Ethics and law teaching?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
24
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 85%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 2
Below average 5
Above average 14
Good 15
Excellent 11
N/A 3
Total 50
How would you rate the Use of Medicines teaching (Prescribing in
Pregnancy)?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
25
No. of responses
(n=50)
Overall satisfaction 95%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 1
Below average 1
Above average 11
Good 14
Excellent 16
N/A 7
Total 50
How would you rate the Formative assessment day?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
26
No. of responses
(n=35)
Overall satisfaction 85%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 1
Below average 4
Above average 3
Good 14
Excellent 12
N/A 1
Total 35
How would you rate the access to computer/IT/library resources?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
27
No. of responses
(n=36)
Overall satisfaction 97%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 1
Above average 10
Good 15
Excellent 10
N/A 0
Total 36
How would you rate the quality of the feedback you received on the
assessment?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
28
No. of responses
(n=36)
Overall satisfaction 100%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 0
Above average 2
Good 21
Excellent 13
N/A 0
Total 36
How would you rate the module as an educational experience?
0
5
10
15
20
25
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
29
No. of responses (n=36)
Overall satisfaction 97%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 1
Above average 2
Good 20
Excellent 13
N/A 0
Total 36
How would you rate the module in terms of your clinical experience?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
