24

Sept. 7, 2012

  • Upload
    tala

  • View
    66

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Sept. 7, 2012. AGENDA: 1 – Bell Ringer 2 – Philosophical Chairs Discussion 3 – Envi . Sci. Pre-Assessment! 4 – Start HW: Discussion Reflection. Today’s Goal: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs. Homework Philosophical Chairs Written Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Sept. 7, 2012
Page 2: Sept. 7, 2012

Sept. 7, 2012

AGENDA:1 – Bell Ringer2 – Philosophical

Chairs Discussion3 – Envi. Sci. Pre-

Assessment!4 – Start HW:

Discussion Reflection

Today’s Goal:Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.Homework1. Philosophical Chairs

Written Evaluation2. Learning Log (on back

of Bell Ringer sheet)

Page 3: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 4: Sept. 7, 2012

4 MINUTES REMAINING…

Page 5: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 6: Sept. 7, 2012

3 MINUTES REMAINING…

Page 7: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 8: Sept. 7, 2012

2 MINUTES REMAINING…

Page 9: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 10: Sept. 7, 2012

1minute Remaining…

Page 11: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 12: Sept. 7, 2012

30 Seconds Remaining…

Page 13: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 14: Sept. 7, 2012

BELL-RINGER TIME IS

UP!

Page 15: Sept. 7, 2012

Sept. 7, 2012

AGENDA:1 – Bell Ringer2 – Philosophical

Chairs Discussion3 – Envi. Sci. Pre-

Assessment!4 – Start HW:

Discussion Reflection

Today’s Goal:Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.Homework1. Philosophical Chairs

Written Evaluation2. Learning Log (on back

of Bell Ringer sheet)

Page 16: Sept. 7, 2012

Friday, Sept. 7

Objective: Students will be able to discuss a scientific article in philosophical chairs.

Bell Ringer:Explain why we should Mark

the Text of a scientific article?

Page 17: Sept. 7, 2012

Week 1

Weekly Agenda

Monday 9/3 – No SchoolTuesday 9/4 – Intro to classWednesday 9/5 – Cornell Notes

& Marking the TextThursday 9/6 – Philosophical

Chairs Discussion of ArticleFriday 9/7 – Finish Discussion +

Envi. Sci. Preassessment

Page 18: Sept. 7, 2012

CHAMPS for Sept. 7, 2012

C – Conversation – Phil’l Chairs: Respectful Discussion. Pre-Assessment: No Talking.

H – Help – RAISE HAND for questionsA – Activity – Phil’l Chairs; Pre-

AssessmentM – Materials and Movement – Pencil,

ArticleP – Participation – Contribute to

Discussion. Then silently do your own best test work.

S – Success – Phil’l Chairs: Learn from each other! Pre-Assessment: Try your best!

Page 19: Sept. 7, 2012

Philosophical ChairsRules of Engagement

1. Be sure you understand the central thesis before the discussion begins. Decide which section to stand in.

2. Listen carefully when others speak and seek to understand their arguments even if you don’t agree.

3. Wait for the mediator to recognize you before you speak; only one person speaks at a time.

4. You must first summarize briefly the previous speaker’s argument before you make your response.

Page 20: Sept. 7, 2012

Philosophical ChairsRules of Engagement (cont’d)

5. If you have spoken for your side, you must wait until three other people on your side speak before you speak again.

6. Be sure that when you speak, you address the ideas, not the person stating them.

7. Keep an open mind and move to the other side or the undecided section if you feel that someone made a good argument or your opinion is swayed.

8. Support the mediator by maintaining order and helping the discussion to progress.

Page 21: Sept. 7, 2012

Philosophical Chairs DiscussionThesis: Chimpanzees should be used

for medical testing research.For homework you were to: Decide your Opinion: Based on your

reading of the article, decide whether you AGREE or DISAGREE with the above statement.

Find 3 pieces of Evidence: Then support your Opinion with at least 3 pieces of Evidence referenced from the article.

You may also find other pieces of evidence other than the article.

Page 22: Sept. 7, 2012

Envi. Sci. Pre-Assessment

Use a pencil and erase clearly. Fill in your Student ID and Full

Heading. Do the best that you can. Work

silently and do YOUR OWN work. I only want to know what YOU know (not what your friend knows).

When Finished: Raise your hand so I can collect your

test. Work on Homework:

Philosophical Chairs Written Evaluation Learning Log (on back of Bell Ringer)

Page 23: Sept. 7, 2012

Article Background Information Chimps are apes

Higher order primates

More closely related to humans (98% same DNA)

Rhesus monkeys are monkeys Lower order

primates Less closely related

to humans

Page 24: Sept. 7, 2012

Article Background Information Lab research generally progresses from

the Petri dish to lower organisms before being tried in humans.