8
Basic information on screw-retained abutments for Bone Level Implants

screw-retained abutments for Bone Level Implantsnordic.straumann.com/content/dam/internet/straumann_nordic... · 4 An excellent combination of scientifically proven implants and sleek

  • Upload
    vohanh

  • View
    220

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Basic information on screw-retained abutments for Bone Level Implants

2

More than flexible.A new kind of esthetics.

For a natural look and feel. The Straumann® Bone Level Implant Line provides great flexibility to deliver an es-thetically pleasing solution to patients.

Simplified handling with the CrossFit® connection

ѹ Makes handling easier and provides confidence about component positioning

ѹ Ensures precision against rotation ѹ Offers restorative flexibility and

long-term mechanical stability

Pleasing esthetic results with Consistent Emergence Profiles™

ѹ Optimizes and simplifies soft tissue management

ѹ Eases the fabrication of temporary and final restorations

Optimized crestal bone preser vation with Bone Control Design™

ѹ Respects the biological distance/width

ѹ Optimal position of smooth and rough surface interface

ѹ Microgap control ѹ Biomechanical implant design ѹ Implant surface osteoconductivity

Well-proven new materials

ѹ Titanium Grade 4 ѹ Roxolid®: A titanium-zirconium

alloy stronger than titanium44,45 and specifically designed for the use in dental implantology

3

Straumann® Bone Level Implants provide an optimized choice for implant treatment. The unique material Roxolid® has been specifically designed for dental implantology and delivers out-standing mechanical results. In combination with the Straumann® SLActive® surface, Straumann delivers an excellent implant sys-tem with outstanding osseointegration and healing properties.

Roxolid® material ▪ Unique Roxolid® material with excellent mechanical properties38

▪ Preserve bone and reduce invasive grafting procedures39

▪ More treatment options with smaller implants

▪ Simplified handling with the CrossFit® connection

▪ Optimized crestal bone preservation with Bone Control Design™

SLActive® surface ▪ Safer and faster treatment from 6 – 8 weeks down to 3 – 4 weeks in all indications27-35

▪ Higher treatment predictability in challenging protocols14-20

▪ Broader treatment possibilities even for patients with compromised health21-26

4

An excellent combination of scientifically proven implants and sleek prosthetic components

The new Straumann® Screw-retained Abutment provides a wide range of prosthetic options for screw-retained restorations. Vari-ous angulations and gingiva heights offer the flexibility to provide an individual solution for edentulous patients, including restoring posterior-tilted implants12.

Straumann® Screw-retained Abutment ▪ Sleek design and clear portfolio

▪ Same connector design for all diameters allow for a streamlined portfolio of tertiary components

▪ Abutment angulations of 0°, 17° and 30°

▪ Only 2 diameters to cover complete Straumann® Bone Level product line.

▪ Product design allows abutment-level impression

▪ Simplified handling with the CrossFit® connection

▪ Different gingiva heights of 1 mm, 2.5 mm and 4 mm

For final restorations, Straumann also offers CADCAM customized screw-retained frameworks for both, implant- and abutment-level.

5

Product overview

Pictures Material Product description Plan components / Screws

Ø 3

.5 m

m

022.2745NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 3.5 mm, GH 1 mm

025.2648-04NC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, straight 0°, D 3.5 mm, GH 2.5 mm

022.2746NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 3.5 mm, GH 2.5 mm

022.2753NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 3.5 mm, GH 4 mm

Ø 4

.6 m

m

022.2747NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 1 mm

025.2650-04NC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm

022.2748NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm

022.2754NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm

022.2749NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A

025.2655-04NC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A022.2750

NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B

022.2755NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type A

025.2658-04NC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B022.2756

NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type B

022.2751NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A

025.2653-04NC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A022.2752

NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B

022.2757NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type A

025.2660-04NC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B022.2758

NC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type B

Ø 4

.6 m

m

022.4745RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 1 mm

025.4648-04RC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm

022.4746RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm

022.4751RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm

022.4747RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A

025.4649-04RC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A022.4748

RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B

022.4752RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type A

025.4650-04RC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B022.4753

RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 17°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type B

022.4749RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A

025.4653-04RC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type A022.4750

RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B

022.4754RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type A

025.4660-04RC Plan Screw-retained Abutment, POM, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 2.5 mm, Type B022.4755

RC Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, angled 30°, D 4.6 mm, GH 4 mm, Type B

6

Impression / transfer components

Ø 3

.5 m

m

025.2243

Impression Post for open tray, TAN, for Screw-retained Abutment, abut. level, 0°, D 3.5 mm

025.2245

Impression Post for closed tray, TAN/POM, for Screw-retained Abutment, abut. level, D 3.5 mm

025.0000CARES® Scanbody for Screw-retained Abutment, D 3.5 mm (NC)

023.2754NC Analog for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 3.5 mm

Ø 4

.6 m

m

Ø 4

.6 m

m

023.4756NC/RC Analog for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, D 4.6 mm

023.4757NC/RC Analog for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, D 4.6 mm

025.2244

Impression Post for open tray, TAN, for Screw-retained Abutment, abut. level, 0°, D 4.6 mm

025.2246

Impression Post for closed tray, TAN/POM, for Screw-retained Abutment, abut. level, D 4.6 mm

025.0001CARES® Scanbody for Screw-retained Abutment, D4.6 (NC/RC)

Temporary restorations / Copings / Screws

024.2323-04NC Protective Cap for Screw-retained Abutment, D 3.5 mm, H 5 mm, PEEK/TAN

024.2324-04NC Protective Cap for Screw-retained Abutment, D 3.5 mm, H 6.5 mm, PEEK/TAN

024.2325-04NC Protective Cap for Screw-retained Abutment, D 3.5 mm, H 8 mm, PEEK/TAN

023.2749NC Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, Ti, Bridge, D 3.5 mm

023.2750NC Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, Ti, Bar, D 3.5 mm

023.2747NC Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, Ti, Crown, D 3.5 mm

023.2755NC Burn-out Coping f. Screw-retained abut., POM, Bridge/Bar, D 3.5 mm

023.2748NC Burn-out Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, POM, Crown, D 3.5 mm

024.4323-04NC/RC Protective Cap for Screw-retained Abutment, D 4.6 mm, H 5.1 mm, PEEK/TAN

024.4324-04NC/RC Protective Cap for Screw-retained Abutment, D 4.6 mm, H 6.6 mm, PEEK/TAN

024.4325-04NC/RC Protective Cap for Screw-retained Abutment, D 4.6 mm, H 8.1 mm, PEEK/TAN

023.4751NC/RC Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, Ti, Bridge, D 4.6 mm

023.4752NC/RC Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, Ti, Bar, D 4.6 mm

023.4747NC/RC Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, Ti, Crown, D 4.6 mm

023.4758NC Burn-out Coping f. Screw-retained Abutment, POM, Bridge/Bar, D 4.6 mm

023.4748NC/RC Burn-out Coping for Screw-retained Abutment, POM, Crown, D 4.6 mm

023.4749NC/RC Screw for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, GH 1 mm

023.4750NC/RC Screw for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, GH 2.5 mm

023.4760NC/RC Screw for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, straight 0°, GH 4 mm

023.4763NC/RC Occlusal Screw, TAN, for Coping, Screw-retained Abutment

025.0002NC/RC Screw for Screw-retained Abutment, TAN, 17°/30°

026.0016Straumann® Planning Guide forScrew-retained Abutment

7

1 based on “The SAC Classification in Implant Dentistry”, ITI 2009, Authors: A. Dawson, S. Chen, D. Buser, L. Cordaro, W. Martin, U. Belser, Classification of R storative Cases, Edentulous Maxilla/Mandible 2 In general maxillary implant-supported/retained overdentures are considered Advanced restora-tions 3 Riegl Survey Patient Satisfaction, Europe, September 2011, How important are attractive teeth to patients? 4 Norm ASTM F67 (states min. tensile strength of annealed titanium). Data on file for Straumann cold-worked titanium and Roxolid® Implants 5 Benic GI, Gallucci GO,Mokti M, Hämmerle CH,Weber HP, Jung RE. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regulardiameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year re-sults of a randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2013; [Epub ahead of print] 6 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 7 Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Zhang ZY, Wieland M, Liu X. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2009;20(3):247–53. 8 Buser D,Wittneben J, Bornstein mm, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: 3-Year Result of a Prospective Study With Early Implant Placement Post Extraction. J Periodontol. 2011 March; 82(3): 342-9. 9 Buser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein mm,Wittneben JG, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser UC. Long-term Stability of Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmentation. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):176S-82S. 10 Nicolau P, Reis R, Guerra F, Rocha S, Tondela J, Brägger U. Immediate and early loading of Straumann® SLActive implants: A Five Year Follow-up. Presented at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration – 6-9 October 2010, Glasgow 11 In-ternational Diabetes Federation. www.idf.org/diabetesatlas 12 Freiberger I., Al-Nawas B. Non-Interventional Study on Success and Survival of TiZr Im-plants. European Association of Osseointegration 20th Annual Scientific Meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2012: Poster presentation. Other Source: Data base Non-interventional study, data on file. 13 Benic G. et al, “Titanium-zirconium narrowdiameter versus titanium regulardiameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study”, 2013, J Clin Periodontol 14 Benic GI, Gallucci GO, Mokti M, Hämmerle CH,Weber HP, Jung RE. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2013; [Epub ahead of print] 15 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regenera-tion in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 16 Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Zhang ZY, Wieland M, Liu X. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2009;20(3):247–53. 17 Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein mm, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Es-thetic Zone: 3-Year Result of a Prospective Study With Early Implant Placement Post Extraction. J Periodontol. 2011 March; 82(3): 342-9. 18 Buser D, Chap-puis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein mm, Wittneben JG, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser UC. Long-term Stability of Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmenta-tion. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):176S-82S. 19 Nicolau P, Reis R, Guerra F, Rocha S, Tondela J, Brägger U. Immediate and early loading of Straumann® SLActive implants: A Five Year Follow-up. Presented at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration – 6-9 October 2010, Glasgow 20 International Diabetes Federation. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/ 21 Schlegel KA, Prechtl C,Möst T, Seidl C, Lutz R, von Wil-mowsky C. Osseointegration of SLActive® implants in diabetic pigs Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Feb;24 (2):128-34. 22 Reginster JY, Burlet N. Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2 Suppl 1):S4-9. 23 Mardas N, Schwarz F, Petrie A, Hakimi AR, Donos N. The effect of SLActive® surface in guided bone formation in osteoporoticlike conditions Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):406-15. 24 WHO: http://www.who.int/ageing/about/facts/en/index.html 25 iData Report , Dental Implants and Final Abutments, Europe 2012 26 iData Report , Dental Implants and Final Abutments, USA 2012 27 Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, deWild M,WielandM, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 76(2):323-334, 2006. 28 DeWild M. Superhy-drophilic SLActive® implants. Straumann document 151.52, 2005 29 Katharina Maniura. Laboratory for Materials – Biology Interactions Empa, St. Gallen, Switzerland Protein and blood adsorption on Ti and TiZr implants as a model for osseointegration. EAO 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, October 17 – 19 2013, Dublin 30 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 35.1 (2008): 64– 75. 31 Rausch-fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to tita-nium surfaces. Dental Materials 2008 Jan;24(1):102-10. Epub 2007 Apr 27. 32 Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA® titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(4): 481-488, 2007. 33 Lang, N.P., et al., Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants.Res 22.4 (2011): 349–56. 34 Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2005 May–Jun;20(3):425–31. 35 Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA® surface: a randomized pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007;22(5):755–760. 36 Compared to existing Straumann Multi-base portfolio 37 Compared to existing Straumann Multi-base portfolio 38 Norm ASTM F67 (states min. tensile strength of annealed titanium). Data on file for Straumann cold-worked titanium and Roxolid® Implants 39 Freiberger I., Al-Nawas B. Non-Interventional Study on Success and Survival of TiZr Implants. European Association of Osseointegration 20th Annual Scientific Meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2012: Poster presentation. Other Source: Data base Non-interventional study, data on file. 40 ITI Treatment Guide „Loading protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients“, Volume 4, 2010, Authors: D. Wismeijer, P. Casentini, G. Gallucci, M. Chiapasco, page 223 Patient Consideration 41 ITI Treatment Guide „Loading protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients“, Volume 4, 2010, Authors: D. Wismeijer, P. Casentini, G. Gallucci, M. Chiapasco, page 54 Treatment Options for the Edentu-lous Arch 42 Straumann® Roxolid® Implants will be delivered with the Loxim™ Transfer Piece, which is connected to the implant with a snap-in mounting. After insertion of the implant, the Loxim™ can be released by hand or with the help of tweezers. 43 ITI Treatment Guide „Loading protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients“, Volume 4, 2010, Authors: D. Wismeijer, P. Casentini, G. Gallucci, M. Chiapasco, page 223 Patient Considerations 44 Norm ASTM F67 (states min. tensile strength of annealed titanium). 45 Data on file for Straumann cold-worked titanium and Roxolid® Implants.

References

International Headquarters Institut Straumann AG Peter Merian-Weg 12 CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland Phone +41 (0)61 965 11 11 Fax +41 (0)61 965 11 01 www.straumann.com

LOCATOR® is a registered trademark of Zest IP Holdings LLC, USA.

© Institut Straumann AG, 2014. All rights reserved.Straumann® and/or other trademarks and logos from Straumann® mentioned herein are the trademarks or registered trademarks of Straumann Holding AG and/or its affiliates. St

raum

ann

prod

ucts

are

CE

mar

ked

Basi

c in

form

atio

n on

scr

ew-r

etai

ned

abut

men

ts fo

r BL,

Nor

dic

verio

n - A

pril

2014