Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
School Plan 2015 – 2017
MILESTONES
Inspire, challenge and
empower students
Staff and leader learning
Authentic and inclusive partnerships for
learning
2016 Template B: V2.0 Lansvale Public School 5220
Strategic direction 1 MILESTONES: STUDENT LEARNING → Inspire, challenge and empower students.
Project leader: Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
1. St
uden
ts a
re e
xpli
citl
y ta
ught
rea
ding
and
wri
ting
stra
tegi
es t
hat
will
ena
ble
the
m t
o ac
cess
and
p
rod
uce
a r
ang
e of
tex
ts
IL L
iter
acy
DP
Ly
ndse
y R
ay
*Identification of students at risk & those needing enrichment/acceleration through tracking of data (L3 PLAN, SMART, L&ST database) & in consultation with literacy & team leaders *Collaboratively establish stage focus areas based on student data *Identify staff professional learning needs Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*Liaise with and coach L3 and FOR trainers when leading PL & working in rooms with class teachers *Establish a visible data room to promote and track student growth against term targets *Model and design quality teaching practices to improve teacher instruction and student growth Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*Explicit training for parent helpers of literacy skills as part of PaTCH *Implement evidence based strategies to build teacher capacity- focusing on quality teaching/ learning environments, learning goals and feedback *All students articulating their learning goals and reflecting upon what they have achieved and ‘where to next’ Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*Build teacher capacity to enable all teachers to have a sound knowledge of the literacy continuum to influence planning cycles and targeted lessons *Closely monitor at risk students and liaise with LaST to implement tiered interventions to individualise student support *Teachers use feedback from lesson observations to refine their practice Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*Examine student growth data and reflect on the effect of current teaching practices *A variety of formative assessment techniques used to report on student progress Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*All teachers work collaboratively to develop new ideas for instruction and use feedback to refine and improve instructions *All teachers making clear links between the English syllabus and Literacy continuum to ensure all content is covered and student progress tracked Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*Open classrooms to showcase quality, differentiated learning environments to parents and neighbouring schools (COS) Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
*Monitor the impact of practice and interventions on student literacy and numeracy learning K-6 *Reflect upon feedback and student growth data to set targeted goals for 2017 Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
PLAN Data 20% improvement for students identified at risk / monitoring 10% growth of students from at expectation to above expectation
Focu
s on
Rea
din
g (J
enny
Op
aci
c)
Implementation of Phase 2 Module 1 (fluency) (3-6)
CRT develop a plan to teach fluency
Implementation of Phase 2 Module 2 (fluency / vocab) (3-6)
Implementation of Phase 2 Module 3 (vocab) (3-6)
CRT present action research project for evaluation
FoR survey shows 95% of teachers effectively implementing Super 6 strategies across all KLA
FoR survey Y5 NAPLAN Reading Growth from CRT action research presentations
Template B: V2.0 Lansvale Public School 5220
1. St
uden
ts a
re e
xpli
citl
y ta
ught
rea
ding
and
wri
ting
st
rate
gies
tha
t w
ill e
nabl
e th
em t
o a
cces
s and
pro
duc
e a
ra
nge
of
L3
AP
Tra
iner
(J
enna
Arz
ap
itia
n)
Support the Identification of students at risk & those needing enrichment/acceleration through tracking of data (L3 Data, PLAN, Reading levels, L&ST database) & in consultation with literacy & team leaders
Co-ordinate the collation of 5 weekly data in L3 across schools Ensure all L3 components of PLPs for Aboriginal students are created in consultation with teachers, L&ST & parents, & are embedded in class programs
Evidence of L3 strategies identified through Program Supervision
Evidence of L3 strategies identified through Lesson Observation
100% of ES1 / S1 CRT’s using L3 strategies in programming.
100% of S1 teachers complete L3 component 20% improvement of students identified at risk or monitoring form end ES1
Scho
ol R
epor
ting
(G
lenn
Hid
son)
2015 NOV Report Grades A-E for English collated
2015 NOV Report Grades A-E for English discussed @ CRT TPL
2016 JUNE Report Grades A-E for English collated
2016 JUNE Report Grades TPL linked with PLAN data for staff critical reflection
2016 JUNE Report Grades A-E for English discussed @ CRT TPL
2016 NOV Report Grades A-E for English collated
Report Grades show 85% of students Sound or Above in Reading and Viewing (2015 - NOV - 78.71%)
Resources
Monitoring efficient and effective use of resources
FoR sessions 2hrs
L3 Funding
FoR sessions 2hrs
L3 Funding
Benchmark Kits
L3 Funding
FoR resources
L3 Funding
FoR sessions 2hrs
L3 Funding
FoR sessions 2hrs
L3 Funding
For Survey → Teachers / Students
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Strategic direction 1 MILESTONES: STUDENT LEARNING → Inspire, challenge and empower students.
Project leader: Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
2. S
tud
ents
pa
rtic
ipa
te in
da
ily n
umer
acy
sess
ions
tha
t st
rate
gica
lly f
ocu
s on
com
mu
nica
ting
, pro
ble
m
so
lvin
g, r
easo
ning
, und
erst
and
ing
and
flu
ency
.
TEN
(J
enny
To)
Support the Identification of students at risk & those needing enrichment/acceleration through tracking of PLAN data & in consultation with numeracy & team leaders
Complete TEN training P-2 staff on 14 modules. Co-ordinate the collation of 5 weekly data in TEN P-2 All teachers at LPS already joined to the TEN & TOWN Edomodo group
Supporting P-2 staff to implement TEN strategies through Dem lessons and team teaching Evidence of TEN strategies identified through Program Supervision, tracking walls and PLAN data
Supporting P-2 staff to implement TEN strategies through Dem lessons and team teaching Evidence of TEN strategies identified through Program Supervision, tracking walls and PLAN data
Evidence of TEN strategies identified through Program Supervision, tracking walls and PLAN data
Evidence of TEN strategies identified through Lesson Observation, tracking walls and PLAN data
Evidence of TEN strategies identified through Program Supervision, tracking walls and PLAN data
P-2 staff accredited with 20 registered hours for TEN
100% of P-2 Staff accredited 20% improvement of students identified at risk or monitoring form end ES1
Nu
mer
acy
Coa
ch
(Kim
Fra
ser)
Identification of students at risk & those needing enrichment / acceleration through tracking of data (TEN, PLAN, SMART, L&ST database) & in consultation with numeracy & team leaders
Liaise with and coach TEN trainer and numeracy team leader when leading PL & working in rooms with class teachers Establish a visible data room to promote and track student growth against term targets Parent workshop on numeracy strategies to support their child at home
Demonstration, team-teaching & programming of explicit, systematic & differentiated lessons for TOWN (Stage 2 teachers) Working with TEN trainer & numeracy team, build teacher capacity to enable all teachers to have a deep knowledge of the numeracy continuum to influence planning cycles and targeted lessons
Closely monitor at risk students and liaise with LaST to implement tiered interventions to individualise student support Stage 2 teachers use feedback from lesson observations to refine their practice Parent workshop on numeracy strategies to support their child at home
Examine student growth data and reflect on the effect of current teaching practices with stage teams Demonstration, team-teaching & programming of explicit, systematic & differentiated lessons for Stage 3 teachers
In collaboration with stage representatives on numeracy team, all teachers making clear links between the Mathematics syllabus and numeracy continuum to ensure all content is covered and student progress is tracked
Stage 3 teachers use feedback from lesson observations to refine their practice
100% stage 2 teachers implementing TOWN & tracking student progress through PLAN 100% K-2 teachers implementing TEN & tracking student progress through PLAN Reflect upon feedback and student growth data to set targeted goals for 2017
20% improvement of students identified at risk or monitoring form end ES1
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
2.
Stu
den
ts p
art
icip
ate
in d
aily
num
era
cy se
ssio
ns t
hat
stra
tegi
cally
focu
s on
com
mun
ica
ting
, pro
ble
m so
lvin
g, r
easo
ning
, und
erst
and
ing
and
flue
ncy.
St
aff
TP
L
Staff TPL NAPLAN analysis 2015
Staff TPL linked to PDP goals
Individual
Stage
School
TPL on PLAN Data progress
TPL on PLAN Data progress
TPL on PLAN Data progress
Collate TPL data for staff (minimum 10 hours individual specific TPL)
PLAN Data 20% improvement for students identified at risk / monitoring 10% growth of students from at expectation to above expectation
Num
era
cy
Con
tinu
um
Tra
ckin
g -
(PLA
N)
Continuum
Tracking completed (K-6) At Risk students identified
Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
Continuum Tracking completed (K-6) Staff TPL linked with 2015 Report Grades
Continuum Tracking completed (K-6) At Risk / Working Beyond students identified
Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
Continuum Tracking completed (K-6) Staff TPL linked with 2016 JUNE Report Grades
Continuum Tracking completed (K-6)
Scho
ol R
epor
ting
(G
lenn
Hid
son)
2015 NOV Report Grades A-E for Maths collated
2015 NOV Report Grades A-E for Maths discussed @ CRT TPL
2016 JUNE Report Grades A-E for Maths collated
2016 JUNE Report Grades TPL linked with PLAN data for staff critical reflection
2016 JUNE Report Grades A-E for Maths discussed @ CRT TPL
2015 NOV Report Grades A-E for English collated
Grades show 85% of students Sound or Above in Number and Algebra (2015 - 80.57% ) 85% of K-2 Sound or higher tracked against all maths grades (2015 - 83.52% )
Resources
Monitoring efficient and effective use of resources
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Strategic direction 1 MILESTONES: STUDENT LEARNING → Inspire, challenge and empower students.
Project leader: Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
3. S
tud
ents
pa
rtic
ipa
te in
inno
vati
ve p
rogr
am
s th
at
exp
licit
ly t
each
the
gen
era
l ca
pa
bili
ties
.
ICT
Fra
mew
ork
(i
Sha
reC
os)
Future Schools Conference attended by representatives of all schools Critical Friend sourced School showcase sharing best practice
Schools host theory/hands on observations/ resources Sharing project sessions on practical applications – linked to the Capability Learning Continuum ICT project (Unit writing commences in all schools) PDP goal linked to technology
Friday/Monday (Leeton) 2 Schools Week 2/3 School showcase sharing best practice
Wk 9/10 Visit to Parkview PS (Leeton) Market Day style TPL including Community of Schools across Leeton
Sharing/ evaluating Rubrics School showcase sharing best practice
Planning Meeting to discuss presentation @ 2017 Innovation Conference Jointly written article about iShare’CoS Sharing / evaluating Rubrics
School showcase sharing best practice Video evidence uploaded to AITSL website ALL staff complete exit survey (SKOLE) School showcase sharing best practice
100% of staff have an awareness of the ICT capability framework Teaching and learning programs embed the general capabilities to assist students to become successful 21st century learners. All students to make significant gains on the ICT capability learning continuum.
Present @ 2017 Innovation Conference SKOLE Survey shows 20% improvement
SOLE
SOLE sessions taught on a fortnightly basis for Stages 2&3
Mentoring TPL provided for all new staff
SOLE Sessions provide TPL for outside staff
Evidence of SOLE strategies identified through Program Supervision
100% of Stage 2 & 3 teachers incorporating SOLE into lessons
BY
OD
(Mel
issa
)
9xBYOD classes supported
Survey staff – BYOD class interest 2017
Parent info sessions / parent - student contracts completed prior to 2017
Evaluate BYOD success through student / parent survey
Student Survey shows 90% success
Cre
ati
on
Sta
tion
Scope of works completed
TPL provided on MovieMaker etc
Room opens for students
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Strategic direction 2: Implementation and progress monitoring → Staff and Leader Learning
Project leaders: Melanie Macmillan Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
1. St
aff
ha
s and
are
sup
por
ted
to
gain
a c
lea
r un
der
sta
ndin
g of
the
acc
red
ita
tion
pro
cess
in li
ne
wit
h th
e na
tion
al t
each
ing
sta
nda
rds w
hich
are
use
d in
the
Per
form
anc
e a
nd D
evel
opm
ent
Fra
mew
ork
Per
form
anc
e &
Dev
elop
men
t Fr
amew
ork
School based executive form for program supervision updated.
Teachers complete PDP in line with national teaching standards in consultation with supervisor linking to School Milestones.
PL for APs on professional growth through observation
PDP Goals linked to School Plan / Milestones
PDP Professional Learning / Evidence sections completed
Class observations completed by Supervisors
Teachers review PDP including the addition of evidence collected to support set goals
PDP Implement / Review sections completed
Class observations completed by Supervisors
Review of PDP with supervisor
Sign off on PDF
PDP Annual Review section completed
90% of all goals set were achieved.
100% of PDP’s link to National Standards.
Tea
cher
Acc
red
ita
tion
Men
tor
(Eri
n El
ling
ton
/ Gle
nn H
idso
n) Beginning Teacher
Survey to establish level of accreditation amongst permanent and temporary staff.
Teacher Accreditation Mentor to establish groups for teachers working towards Accreditation at Proficient level and maintaining accreditation.
PL provided by Teacher mentor on accreditation processes.
Targeted PL for groups at varying levels of accreditation process (fortnightly for teachers working towards accreditation and twice a term for teachers maintaining).
Targeted PL for groups at varying levels of accreditation process.
Targeted PL for groups at varying levels of accreditation process.
Targeted PL for groups at varying levels of accreditation process.
Targeted PL for groups at varying levels of accreditation process.
Accreditation complete and submitted for checking (for required staff)
All staff required to finalise accreditation in 2016 have submitted their report.
Survey to evaluate effectiveness of targeted beginning teacher groups.
Survey teachers maintaining accreditation to establish number of hours logged and evaluated.
Ind
ivid
uali
sed
TP
L
TPL Calendar linked to PDP goals and staff / school needs
Lesson Study (Y4) used for TPL quality teaching
TPL Calendar linked to PDF goals and staff / school needs
Lesson Study (P-6) used for TPL quality teaching
TPL Calendar linked to PDF goals and staff / school needs
Areas of Improvement identified by teachers collated and used to plan supplementary TPL
TPL Calendar linked to PDF goals and staff / school needs
Collation of staff TPL in school / external against PDP goals
Resources
Monitoring efficient and effective use of
Release days @$500 per APs for PDF Annual Review
Release days @$3000
Release days @$500 per APs for PDP Annual Review
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
resources
Strategic direction 2: Implementation and progress monitoring → Staff and Leader Learning
Project leaders: Melanie Macmillan Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
2. L
ead
ers a
nd a
spiri
ng le
ader
s pa
rtic
ipa
te in
pro
fess
iona
l lea
rnin
g, m
ento
ring
and
coa
chin
g to
b
uild
ca
pa
city
Asp
irin
g Le
ad
ers
Aspiring leaders appointed through EOI.
Aspiring Leaders write Milestones for designated School Plan focus
Aspiring leaders check in with Snr Exec on progress
Aspiring leaders check in with Snr Exec on progress
Aspiring leaders check in with Snr Exec on progress
Aspiring leaders check in with Snr Exec on progress
Aspiring leaders evaluate goals set / achieved against MILESTONE responsibilities.
Inst
ruct
iona
l Rou
nds
BC
Q’C
os
Lesson Study TPL for all schools at Smithfield RSL
Lesson Study occurs
Lesson Study occurs for all COS
Lesson Study (P-6) offered for TPL quality teaching
Lesson Study (P-6) offered for TPL quality teaching
Lesson Study (P-6) offered for TPL quality teaching
iRounds @ Lansvale PS
Lesson Study (P-6) offered for TPL quality teaching
Schools Showcase presenting Weebly as a final product
Instructional Rounds evaluated
PB
L
Staff TPL on SENTRAL for consistent tracking of student well-being
PBL lessons to revise School Rules & Expectations
Launch Day for PBL to introduce PBL to students and community
Program checklist collection
PBL Training – ALL staff
NEW staff TPL on SENTRAL entries
Monitor that teachers are giving out tokens in the classroom and on the playground
Monitor use of orange book
PBL leaders feedback to staff on critical incidents
Monitor student achievement of PBL on a whole class system
Tell Them From Me Survey
Critical incidents (173 in 2015) decreased by 10%
80% of staff using PBL language on the playground
80% of students know what PROUD means
Gold achievement celebration
Resources
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Monitoring efficient and effective use of resources
Annual Milestone
Strategic direction 2: Implementation and progress monitoring → Staff and Leader Learning
Project leaders: Melanie Macmillan Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
3. S
taff
act
ivel
y se
ek a
nd a
re p
rovi
ded
wit
h in
divi
dua
lise
d a
nd t
arg
eted
pro
fess
iona
l lea
rnin
g op
por
tuni
ties
to
bui
ld q
ualit
y te
ach
ing
pra
ctic
e.
L3
Jenn
a A
zap
itia
n
Teachers start training in targeted L3 workshop.
S1 participating in L3
Submit Data
S1 participating in L3
Teachers completed preliminary tasks for targeted L3 workshop
Submit Data
S1 participating in L3
S1 CRT complete mandatory requirements for L3
Submit Data
ALL S1 teachers successfully complete L3 training.
Submit Data
L3 (
ES1
OP
L)
Elly
n B
reue
r
Teachers continue training in targeted L3 (ES1 OPL) workshop.
ES1 participating in L3 (ES1)
1X in class observation
Submit Data
ES1 participating in L3 (ES1)
Submit Data
Teachers completed preliminary tasks for targeted L3 (ES1) workshop
L3 OPL workshop
Submit Data
1X in class observation
ES1 CRT complete mandatory requirements for L3
ALL ES1 teachers successfully complete L3 OPL training.
Focu
s on
Rea
din
g
Implementation of Phase 2 Module 1 (fluency) (3-6)
CRT develop a plan to teach fluency
Implementation of Phase 2 Module 2 (fluency / vocab) (3-6)
Implementation of Phase 2 Module 3 (vocab) (3-6)
CRT present action research project for evaluation
FoR survey shows 95% of teachers effectively implementing Super 6 strategies across all KLA
FoR survey Y5 NAPLAN Reading Growth from CRT action research presentations
ICT
ICT mentor group established
STEAM team created
Spirals of Inquiry of
PL on authentic use of technology across the curriculum – personalised groups for meeting student needs.
PL on authentic use of technology across the curriculum Survey staff on ICT across the curriculum.
PL data collected for ASR
SKOLE survey show improvement from entry data
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
STEAM 2-6
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Strategic direction 2: Implementation and progress monitoring → Staff and Leader Learning
Project leaders: Melanie Macmillan Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
3. S
taff
act
ivel
y se
ek a
nd a
re p
rovi
ded
wit
h in
divi
dua
lise
d a
nd
targ
eted
pro
fess
iona
l lea
rnin
g op
por
tuni
ties
to
bui
ld q
ualit
y te
ach
ing
pra
ctic
e.
ICT
Fra
mew
ork
(i
Sha
reC
os)
Future Schools Conference attended by representatives ofiShare’Cos Critical Friend sourced School showcase sharing best practice
Schools host theory/hands on observations/ resources Sharing project sessions on practical applications – linked to the Capability Learning Continuum ICT project (Unit writing commences in all schools) P-6 PDP goal linked to technology
Friday/Monday (Leeton) 2 Schools Week 2/3 School showcase sharing best practice
Wk 9/10 Visit to Parkview PS (Leeton) Market Day style TPL including Community of Schools across Leeton
Sharing/ evaluating Rubrics SEESAW sharing TPL School showcase sharing best practice
Planning Meeting to discuss presentation @ 2017 Innovation Conference Jointly written article about iShare’CoS Sharing / evaluating Rubrics
School showcase sharing best practice Video evidence uploaded to AITSL website ALL staff complete exit survey (SKOLE) School showcase sharing best practice
100% of staff have an awareness of the ICT capability framework Teaching and learning programs embed the general capabilities to assist students to become successful 21st century learners. All students to make significant gains on the ICT capability learning continuum.
Present @ 2017 Innovation Conference SKOLE Survey shows 20% improvement
Resources
Monitoring efficient and effective use of resources
$1600 x5 for L3
FoR Expenditure commitment
Approx. $50,00
5x$500 release days for L3
5x$500 release days for L3
5x$500 release days for L3
5x$500 release days for L3
5x$500 release days for L3
Annual Milestone
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Strategic direction 3: Implementation and progress monitoring → Authentic and inclusive partnerships for learning.
Project leaders: Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
1. P
are
nts
und
erst
and
, acc
ess
and
va
lue
the
vari
ety
of s
up
por
t st
ruct
ure
s a
vaila
ble
to t
hem
b
oth
at
scho
ol a
nd b
eyon
d (
Spee
ch t
hera
pist
, O
T,C
LOs,
SaC
C, S
LSO
, su
pp
ort
tea
cher
s)
Pa
rent
Invo
lvem
ent
Meet the teacher BBQ
Ongoing explanations of support personnel through school newsletter and school APP
Community Resources Expo
Trial 3-Way interviews for Stage 3
Update of web site to include job descriptions of support personnel
Parent Teacher interviews
Extend 3-Way interviews for Stage 3
Annual Milestone
Collect data on parent involvement
2. S
tud
ent
educ
ati
onal
pro
gra
ms a
re s
up
por
ted
by
pro
vid
ing
pa
rent
s/ca
rers
wit
h a
bro
ad
ra
nge
of le
arn
ing
opp
ortu
niti
es.
(Eng
lish
cla
sses
, Pa
rent
wor
ksh
ops,
Hom
ewor
k C
entr
e, P
lay
grou
p)
SaC
C P
rogr
am
s / P
are
nt S
upp
ort
NAPLAN in-service for parents → (Figures collected on attendance)
NAPLAN in-service for parents
Parent Participation numbers collated
SaCC and CLO coordinate a range of on-site parenting programs to encourage parent participation
SaCC to report on programs run with participation numbers
Parents surveyed for future needs
Program Evaluated and report to Exec by SACC
Over 20 individual PL opportunities provided for our community
Parent participation numbers collated for 2016.
Homework Centre / Playgroup commences
Participation numbers collated for 2016.
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Strategic direction 3: Implementation and progress monitoring → Authentic and inclusive partnerships for learning.
Project leaders: Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
PROCESS MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM EVIDENCE
3. S
taff
pa
rtic
ipa
te in
and
dev
elop
pos
itiv
e re
lati
onsh
ips /
pa
rtne
rshi
ps w
ith
a v
ari
ety
of n
etw
orks
in t
he w
ider
sc
hool
com
mun
ity.
(W
ood
ville
Com
mun
ity,
Da
ysta
r, C
OS@
Lea
d, C
oS, V
ale
gro
up o
f sch
ools,
UW
S)
PA
TCH
Nei
lsen
Bud
dy
Pro
gra
m
Nielsen Company Stage 3 Literacy Buddies
Nielsen Company provide Stage 3 Literacy Buddies with a funded One day excursion and Nielsen Global Impact Day K-6
Nielsen Company to provide Xmas party for Stage 3
Feedback sought by Exec
Spee
ch
South West Clinic partnership Speech / OT
Speech Therapist employed 2X days per week
Review ‘Gift of Speech’ numbers
Identify students for follow up in 2017
15 students access program in 2016
Com
mun
ity
Pa
rtne
rshi
ps Staff initiate joint
learning with local schools where appropriate
School TPL targeting local community resources (1X per semester minimum)
School TPL targeting local community resources (1X per semester minimum)
Collate staff numbers involved in shared practices
Da
ysta
r Daystar Breakfast Club continued
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Resources
Monitoring efficient and effective use of resources
$100 meeting expenses
$500 BBQ
$100 meeting expenses $100 meeting expenses Cost of catering + venue $TBA
$100 meeting expenses
Key funding initiatives: progress monitoring of initiatives, impact and resources
Off track Implementation delayed On track
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
KEY INITIATIVES MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM
1. Aboriginal background funding
Employment of an SLSO to support students on the Norta Norta Learning Assistance
Annual Milestone 80% of Aboriginal students meeting stage outcomes.
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Review of Pathways with updated implementation
Review of Pathways with updated implementation
Review of Pathways with updated implementation
Review of Pathways with updated implementation
Resources ($ value)
$5,536.00 + Equity Aborginal funding $6,238.00 = $11,774.00
2.English language proficiency funding
2.0 EAL/D Allocation
Purchase of EALD resources
Purchase of EALD resources
Annual Milestone
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Resources ($ value)
$201,002.00 + Flexible funding $2,198.00
+ Flexible funding $2,000.00
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
KEY INITIATIVES MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM
3. Socio-economic background funding
Employment of:
-0.6 Schools as Communities Coordinator (SaCC)
-2 x CLOS 0.2 each
-0.2 Bilingual SLSO
-Technology Paraprofessional
-Speech Pathologist 0.3
-Occupational Therapist 0.2
Employment of:
-5 x casuals for Stage Planning to release teachers to plan together
Employment of:
-5 x casuals for Stage Planning to release teachers to plan together
Employment of:
-5 x casuals for Stage Planning to release teachers to plan together
Annual Milestone
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
LST Meetings/feedback
Community meetings/feedback
LST Meetings/feedback
Community meetings/feedback
LST Meetings/feedback
Community meetings/feedback
LST Meetings/feedback
Community meetings/feedback
LST Meetings/feedback
Community meetings/feedback
LST Meetings/feedback
Community meetings/feedback
Recommendations for 2016
Resources ($ value)
Total equity funding = $719.868.00
$2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
4. Low level adjustment for disability funding
-2.0 x SLSO (2.0 Learning Assistance)
NCCD Funding used for TPL / Interviews with CRTs ($6,000)
Annual Milestone
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Feedback about student progress on IEPs
Feedback about student progress on IEPs
Feedback about student progress on IEPs
Feedback about student progress on IEPs
Resources ($ value)
Learning and Support Flexible Funding = $61,239.00
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
KEY INITIATIVES MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM
5. Support for beginning teachers
2 release days per term.
2 release days per term.
2 release days per term.
Annual Milestone
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Resources ($ value)
$3856.75
6. Other key school operational area (optional)
Annual Milestone
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Resources ($ value)
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)
2016 TERM 1 TERM 2 TERM 3 TERM 4
KEY INITIATIVES MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM MID TERM END TERM
7. Other key school operational area (optional)
Annual Milestone
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Resources ($ value)
8. Other key school operational area (optional)
Annual Milestone
Evaluation processes and impact assessment
Resources ($ value)
Reviewed DoE 2016 (February)