Upload
solomon-lambert
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
School of GeographyFACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Where do you come from? The changing nature of questions about migration in UK Censuses
Oliver Duke-Williams
School of Geography, University of Leeds
Paper presented at the Remaking Migration Theory conference
Brighton, 13-14 May 2009
Where do you come from?
• Questions about migration and mobility in the Census
• Questions in the 2011 Census
• Will they help to break down binary views?
• Will the results be worthwhile?
Census questions
British / UK Censuses have asked various questions about migration and other aspects of mobility
• Direct questions about recent migration
• Questions about lifetime migration
• Implicit questions about ‘others’
• Questions about temporary migration and shorter term mobility
A history of questions about migration
• First British Census in 1801
• 1801-1831 Censuses simple aggregate head counts
• 1841 Census first to have household schedule
• Specific questions to be answered for all individuals
• Questions about or related to migration asked in all Censuses from 1841 onwards
The Victorian Censuses
• 1841 Census: two questions about migration
• “Whether born in same county?”
• “Whether born in Scotland, Ireland or Foreign Parts?”
• 1851 Census: one question about migration
• “Where born?”
• Similar questions posed in subsequent 19th century Censuses
Victorian Censuses
• Reservations about data quality
• Respondents in different parts of Britain were given different instructions about how to answer
• More information gathered in England and Wales than elsewhere
• The questions established some information about migration within Britain over a person’s lifetime
Source: Ravenstein, 1885
Birthplace
• Questions about place of birth have continued to be asked in all UK Censuses
• For recent Censuses, these are reported with varying levels of detail at all geographies down to small area level
Direct questions about recent migration
• The current ‘migration question’ in the Census considers recent migration as opposed to lifetime migration
• The question was first included in the 1961 Census, and has been retained with minor changes in wording since then
• The 1971 Census additionally included a 5-year transition question
“What was your usual address one year ago?”
Direct question – answers
• For those who were not at the same address one year prior to the Census most are prompted to write in an address
• A few ‘special cases’ have been recognised with tick-box options
• Aged under one
• No fixed address (2001)
• This covers a significant number of people, but is poorly defined
• Mean proportion of migrants who had no fixed address: 6.6%
• Range at Local Authority level is from 3.4% (Richmondshire) to 14.2% (Newham)
Questions about ‘otherness’
• Questions about nationality
• All Censuses 1841 to 1961
• Questions about parent’s nationality
• 1971, separate answers for mother and father
• Questions about religion and ethnic group
Census questions about ethnicity
• Question about ethnic group first included in 1991 Census
• Question asks about both skin colour and region or country of ‘origin’
• White
• Black-Caribbean
• Black-African
• Black-Other
• Indian
• Pakistani
• Bangladeshi
• Chinese
• Other
Ethnicity: 2001
• The ethnicity question was revised in 2001
• Major categories remain the same, although wording changed
• “Black” changed to “Black or Black British”
• Introduction of additional major category, “Mixed”
• White category subdivided
Questions about religion
• Religion question used in 1851; debate over interpretation of results
• No further use until 2001
• 1920 Census Act specifically prevented inclusion of religion
• Amended for 2001 Census
• Considerable debate over question wording
• Religion is the only optional question on the Census form
2001 debates
Both the ethnicity and religion questions prompted significant media interest and concerted campaigns
• Campaign for boycott in Wales
• Viral campaign for Jedi religion
Percentage of population reporting ‘Jedi’ religion, 2001: England and Wales, Local and Unitary Authorities
Quartiles: 0.2% min, 2.6% max
Source: ONS: www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=297
Temporary and shorter term mobility
• Inclusion of students a major issue for interpretation of results and analysis of change over time
• 1991 – students included at parental home
• 2001 – students included at place of study
• Journeys to place of work and to place of study (Scotland)
• Provides a ‘ghost’ of under-explored area of patterns of weekly commuting etc
2011 Census
Next census to take place on March 27 2011
• Not one census, but three
• First post 9/11 Census in UK
• Will include a number of new questions, including questions relating to migration
Migration in the 2011 Census
• Direct one-year migration question to be included as usual
• New questions
• Date of entry to the UK
• Length of intended stay
Date of entry to the UK
• Year and month of most recent entry to the UK
• 1971 Census included a similar question
• Year of first entry
• Results not included in 1971 Small Area Statistics
• Longitudinal Study includes results
• ‘Strong relationship between errors and year of entry’
• Error in interpretation of ‘first entry’
Length of intended stay
“Including the length of time already spent here, how long do you intend to stay in the United Kingdom?”
• Less than 6 months
• 6 to 12 months
• More than 12 months
• No precedent in Census for this question
• Not planned in Scotland
• Subjective and complex
• Doubts over data quality
Citizenship and ethnicity
New or revised questions about citizenship, national identity and ethnicity
• Citizenship: “Which passports do you hold?”
• New question
• Multiple answers allowed
• National identity: “How would you describe your national identity?”
• English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, British, Other (write in)
• Multiple answers allowed
• Language spoken
• New general question; specific previous questions in Wales, Scotland etc
2011 ethnicity
• Ethnicity question again revised
• Expansion of white groups
• Change of Chinese in major groups
• Explicit inclusion of Arab ethnicity
Second residences
• Specific questions about second residences
• Different approaches tested in England and Wales and Scotland
• Question dropped in Scotland
Second residences
• Do you stay at another address for more than 30 days per year?”
• Tick reason
• Armed Forces base
• Another address when working away from home
• Student’s home or address
• Another parent or guardian’s address
• Holiday home
• Other
Second residences: Scotland
• Different structure in Scottish tests
• Give other address and reason
• Further questions about time spent there
• How many days a week?
• How many weeks a year?
2011 Census
Are the questions worthwhile?
• What will the data quality be like?
• What will we be able to do with the results?
• Will analysis of the questions promote less dichotomous views of migration?
Data quality
Direct migration question
• Same question as in previous years
• Inherent data quality will be the same
• Usefulness in practice subject to output policies
Data quality
Date of entry
• 1971 experience suggests poor response quality
• Question may be hard to answer; target group more likely to have limited English language skills
• Could be replaced with more general ‘when did you move to your current address?’
• Would apply to all people
Data quality
Length of intended stay
• Subjective; answer may change
• Intrusive
• Target group may have more reason than others to be suspicious of question intentions
• Surveillance of migrants
• Legal implications
• May be question-specific response problems
• May affect overall response quality
Data quality
Citizenship, national identity and ethnicity
• Citizenship problems for children?
• Difficulties of national identity classification
• New treatment of Arab ethnicity may cause suspicion in conjunction with other questions
Data quality
Second residences
• Many reasons for having a second residence
• Impossible to frame time-related questions that work
• Real opportunity to expand ideas of internal migration, and relationships between migration and commuting
• Only applies to limited sub-population
• Output data has risk of being unusable
Comparison to other countries
Country Transition period
Date of entry
Intention to stay
Second residences
Other
Ireland 2006 1 year - - - Have you lived outside Ireland?
New Zealand 2006 1 year
5 years
First entry - - How long at this address?
Australia 2006 5 years First entry - -
Canada 2006
(Long form)
1 year
5 years
Yes (permanent
entry)
- -
USA 2000
(Long form)
5 years First entry
+ when gained citizenship
- -
Conclusions
• Migration data are important to frame debates, although they tend towards binary structures
• Census is best source of small area data
• 2011 will see new questions
• Questions on second residences will allow better analysis of several facets of migration
• Question about intention to stay is poor and may harm overall response
School of GeographyFACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Oliver Duke-Williams
School of Geography, University of Leeds