SARC Report for Margaret Heath Elementary - Edl€¦ · The staff at Margaret Heath Elementary continuously strives to ensure that all students are proficient on the California State

Margaret Heath Elementary

By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information aboutthe condit ion and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educat ional agencies (LEAs) are required toprepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w ith specific act ivit ies to addressstate and local priorit ies. Addit ionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent w ith data reported in the SARC.

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Educat ion (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

For addit ional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

DataQuest

Internet Access

California Department of Education

School Accountability Report CardReported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains addit ional information about this school and comparisons of the school tothe district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates,dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners).

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locat ions that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at librariesand public locat ions is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrict ions may include the hours of operat ion, the length of t ime that aworkstat ion may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstat ion, and the ability to print documents.

Maria D. Alonso, PrincipalPrincipal, Margaret Heath Elementary

My name is Maria D Alonso, and I am the very proud Principal of Margaret Heath Elementary. We are a TK-6th gradeelementary school w ith a current enrollment of approximately 507 students. The staff at Margaret Heath is highlyqualified, and they take pride in providing our students w ith classroom environments conducive to learning and meetingthe needs of all students. All of our teachers have been trained in the area of the Common Core State Standards, andthey have received extensive professional development in both English Language Arts and Mathematics to facilitate w iththe implementat ion of the new state standards. Common Core instruct ion provides our students w ith academic rigor andencourages communicat ion, crit ical thinking, creat ivity, and collaborat ion. We are a Dual Language school and prideourselves in offering our parents the opportunity to select a program that w ill st imulate their child’s cognit ive, social, andlinguist ic development. Our Dual Language Program prepares our students w ith advantages to compete for futurecareers, and it provides them w ith the skills needed to live and work in a mult icultural and global economy. Overall, we arean extremely dedicated staff, and we are ready to serve all students in a safe and nurturing environment.

Margaret Heath Elementary14321 School St.Baldw in Park, CA 91706-1650

Phone: 626-338-4013E-mail: [email protected]

About Our SchoolAbout Our School

ContactContact

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/

http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/

http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/

mailto:[email protected]

Last updated: 1/31/2017


About This School

Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)

District Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)

District Name Baldw in Park Unified

Phone Number (626) 962-3311

Superintendent Froilan Mendoza

E-mail Address [email protected]

Web Site www.bpusd.net

School Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)

School Name Margaret Heath Elementary

Street 14321 School St.

City, State, Zip Baldw in Park, Ca, 91706-1650

Phone Number 626-338-4013

Principal Maria D. Alonso, Principal

E-mail Address [email protected]

Web Site http://mhe-bpusd-ca.schoolloop.com

County-District-School (CDS) Code

19642876011464

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17)School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17)

The staff at Margaret Heath Elementary cont inuously strives to ensure that all students are proficient on the California State Standards. Teachers at the schoolmeet regularly to analyze student data, plan and discuss effect ive teaching strategies. In addit ion, teachers align their lessons to the state standards in order toincrease student achievement. During the school day, teachers team and provide school w ide intervent ion and English language development (ELD) by groupingstudents based on ability. At Margaret Heath, parents have the choice to enroll their children in an English program or a Dual Language Program. Our DualLanguage program is designed to provide students w ith the opportunity to learn and excel in two languages: English and Spanish. The teachers have all receivedtraining on the common core state standards, and are meeting w ith their grade level peers to align the current curriculum and assessments to the common core.All teachers are trained in GLAD strategies which provide them w ith outstanding tools to meet the needs of our English Language Learners. As for technology, allof our classrooms are current ly equipped w ith SMART boards or ENO boards and computers w ith internet access. We have a computer lab w ith thirty-six studentcomputers, and there are computers in our library that are accessible to students as well. Our students use computer based programs such as Accelerated Readerto assist w ith progress in the area of language arts. Our teachers have and w ill cont inue to receive training in the area of technology. All students are eligible topart icipate in our after school Think Together program. We are proud of our partnership w ith Think Together as we are both dedicated to sett ing highexpectat ions for our students. At Margaret Heath we believe that all students can learn and achieve success, and we work collaborat ively to meet the needs ofall students.

Students are valued and supported in achieving academic success!

2015-16 SARC - Margaret Heath Elementary

Page 2 of 26


www.bpusd.net


http://mhe-bpusd-ca.schoolloop.com



Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16)Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16)

Grade Level Number of Students

Kindergarten 88

Grade 1 70

Grade 2 81

Grade 3 56

Grade 4 93

Grade 5 65

Grade 6 56

Total Enrollment 509

Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 60

20

40

60

80

100

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16)Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16)

Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American 0.6 %

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.0 %

Asian 2.6 %

Filipino 1.0 %

Hispanic or Lat ino 95.9 %

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 %

White 0.0 %

Two or More Races 0.0 %

Other -0.1 %

Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 87.0 %

English Learners 39.9 %

Students w ith Disabilit ies 15.3 %

Foster Youth 2.2 %


Page 3 of 26



A. Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1):

Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credent ialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;Pupils have access to standards-aligned instruct ional materials; andSchool facilit ies are maintained in good repair

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of posit ions filled by teachers who lack legal authorizat ion to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.

* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners.

Teacher CredentialsTeacher Credentials

Teachers School District

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2016-17

With Full Credent ial 23 25 22 624

Without Full Credent ial 0 0 0 0

Teachers Teaching Outside SubjectArea of Competence (w ith fullcredent ial)

0 0 0 2

2014-15 2015-16 2016-170

5

10

15

20

25

30Teachers with Full Credential

Teachers without Full Credential

Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsTeacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicator2014-

152015-

162016-

17

Misassignments of Teachers of EnglishLearners

0 0 0

Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0

Vacant Teacher Posit ions 0 0 0

2014-15 2015-16 2016-17-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

Total Teacher Misassignments

Vacant Teacher Positions


Page 4 of 26


Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools w ith student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those w ith student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

Year and month in which data were collected: September 2016

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16)Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16)

Location of ClassesPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by

Highly Qualified TeachersPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by

Highly Qualified Teachers

This School 100.0% 0.0%

All Schools in District 100.0% 0.0%

High-Poverty Schoolsin District

100.0% 0.0%

Low-Poverty Schoolsin District

0.0% 0.0%

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17)Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17)

Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of AdoptionFrom Most Recent

Adoption?Percent Students Lacking Own

Assigned Copy

Reading/Language Arts

Litt le Treasures - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2010)

Un Salto a Pre-K - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2010)

22 English Big Book T it les - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2010)

22 Spanish Big Book - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2010)

California Treasures 1.1 - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2010)

California Tesoros de lectura 1.1 California - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill(2010)


California Tesoros de lectura 1.2 - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2010)









Yes 0.0 %

Mathematics

My Math Big Book - Macmillan/McGraw-Hill (2015)

My Math, Grades K-5, consumable student edit ions - MacmillanMcGraw-Hill (2015)

Mis Matematicas, grados k-5, consumable student edit ions -Macmillan McGraw-Hill (2015)

California Math, Course 1, consumable student edit ions - GlencoeMcGraw-Hill (2015)

Yes 0.0 %

Science

California Science Kindergarten Kit - Houghton Mifflin (2007)

California Ciencias Kindergarten Kit - Houghton Mifflin (2007)

California Science Level 1 - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Yes 0.0 %


Page 5 of 26


Note: Cells w ith N/A values do not require data.

California Ciencias Nivel 1 - Houghton Mifflin (2006)





Earth Science - Holt Reinhart and W inston (2007)

Ciencias de la T ierra - Holt Reinhart and W inston (2007)

History-Social Science

My World and Me - Big Book - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Mi Mundo y Yo - Big Book - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

School and Family - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Escuela y Familia - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Neighborhoods - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Vecindarios - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Communit ies - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Communidades - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

California Studies - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Estuidos de California - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Early United States - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Historia de Estados Unidos: Inicios - Houghton Mifflin (2006)

Ancient Civilizat ions - Holt Reinhart and W inston (2006)

Las Ant iguas Civilizaciones - Holt Reinhart and W inston (2006)

Yes 0.0 %

Foreign LanguageN/A

0.0 %

HealthN/A

0.0 %

Visual and PerformingArts N/A

0.0 %

Science Lab Eqpmt(Grades 9-12)

N/A N/A 0.0 %


Page 6 of 26


School Facility Good Repair StatusYear and month of the most recent FIT report: August 2016

Overall Facility Rate

School Facility Conditions and Planned ImprovementsSchool Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements

Facilit ies

The Baldw in Park Unified School District takes great efforts to ensure that all schools are clean, safe, and funct ional. Central School also scored 99.43% inaccordance w ith on the W illiams Facilit ies visit . To assist in this effort, the district uses a Facility Instrument Tool (FIT) developed by the State of California OPSC.The results of this survey are available upon request.

The Maintenance and Operat ions Department has implemented a cloud-based online work order system in order to priorit ize, track requests, and monitorcomplet ion rates. The mission of the department is to provide quality service in an efficient and professional manner to ensure all facilit ies are safe and comfortablefor all students and staff.

Results of county office facilit ies inspect ion and monitoring unannounced on August 22, 2016 - 99.07% exemplary.

Reported noted: School is well maintained.

System Inspected Rating

Repair Needed andAction Taken or

Planned

Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC,Sewer

GoodNo deficiencies noted.

Interior: Interior Surfaces GoodNo deficiencies noted.

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness,Pest/Vermin Infestat ion


Electrical: Electrical GoodNo deficiencies noted.

Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms,Sinks/Fountains

GoodREPAIR NEEDED

A. Restroom sink inbuilding C not working.

B. Toilet/urinal notworking in staff

restroom.

ACTION TAKEN

A. Restroom sink inbuilding c repaired.

B. Toilet/urinal in staffrestroom repaired.

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials GoodNo deficiencies noted.

Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs GoodNo deficiencies noted.

External: Playground/School Grounds,W indows/Doors/Gates/Fences



Page 7 of 26


Year and month of the most recent FIT report: August 2016

Overall Rat ing Exemplary


Page 8 of 26


B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4):

Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced SummativeAssessments for students in the general educat ion populat ion and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] andmathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA andmathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may part icipate in the administrat ion of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned w ith alternateachievement standards, which are linked w ith the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students w ith significant cognit ive disabilit ies); and

The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that sat isfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the CaliforniaState University, or career technical educat ion sequences or programs of study.

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All StudentsCAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students

Subject

Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards

School District State

2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16

English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 27.0% 26.0% 34.0% 37.0% 44.0% 48.0%

Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 16.0% 17.0% 19.0% 22.0% 34.0% 36.0%


Page 9 of 26


Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the total number ofstudents who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAsdivided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.

Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: The number of students tested includes all students who part icipated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students testedis not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who receivedscores.

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group

Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16)Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16)

ELA - Grade 3ELA - Grade 3

Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded

All Students 59 59 100.0% 27.1%

Male 37 37 100.0% 29.7%

Female 22 22 100.0% 22.7%

Black or African American -- -- -- --

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive -- -- -- --

Asian -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- --

Hispanic or Lat ino 56 56 100.0% 25.0%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- --

White -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- --

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 50 50 100.0% 24.0%

English Learners 25 25 100.0% 12.0%

Students w ith Disabilit ies -- -- -- --

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- --


Page 10 of 26







All Students 91 90 98.9% 16.7%

Male 54 53 98.2% 17.0%

Female 37 37 100.0% 16.2%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --




Students w ith Disabilit ies 24 24 100.0% 4.2%




Page 11 of 26







All Students 63 62 98.4% 33.9%

Male 27 27 100.0% 18.5%

Female 36 35 97.2% 45.7%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --








Page 12 of 26





ELA- ELA- Grade 6Grade 6


All Students 57 55 96.5% 29.1%

Male 32 31 96.9% 12.9%

Female 25 24 96.0% 50.0%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --








Page 13 of 26


Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the totalnumber of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard onthe CAAs divided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.



CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student GroupCAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group

Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16)Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16)

Mathematics - Grade 3Mathematics - Grade 3


All Students 59 59 100.0% 25.4%

Male 37 37 100.0% 27.0%

Female 22 22 100.0% 22.7%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --








Page 14 of 26







All Students 91 90 98.9% 12.2%

Male 54 53 98.2% 15.1%

Female 37 37 100.0% 8.1%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --



English Learners 42 42 100.0% --

Students w ith Disabilit ies 24 24 100.0% --




Page 15 of 26







All Students 63 62 98.4% 16.1%

Male 27 27 100.0% 11.1%

Female 36 35 97.2% 20.0%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --








Page 16 of 26







All Students 56 56 100.0% 17.9%

Male 32 32 100.0% 9.4%

Female 24 24 100.0% 29.2%



Asian -- -- -- --




White -- -- -- --








Page 17 of 26



Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) ingrades five, eight, and ten.

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Tests Results in Science by Student GroupGrades Five, Eight and Grade Ten (School Year 2015-16)

Note: Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The “Proficient or Advanced” is calculated by taking the total number of studentswho scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students w ith valid scores.

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All StudentsCAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students

Subject

Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced


2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 38.0% 37.0% 35.0% 56.0% 50.0% 41.0% 60.0% 56.0% 54.0%

Student GroupTotal

EnrollmentNumber of Students with Valid

ScoresPercent of Students with Valid

ScoresPercent Proficient or

Advanced

All Students 63 62 98.4% 35.5%

Male 27 27 100.0% 40.7%

Female 36 35 97.2% 31.4%


American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0 0 0.0% 0.0%

Asian -- -- -- --



Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0%

White 0 0 0.0% 0.0%

Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0%




Students Receiving Migrant Educat ionServices

0 0 0.0% 0.0%



Page 18 of 26


State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8):

Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical educat ion

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16)California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16)

Grade Level

Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards

Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards

5 28.6% 28.6% 9.5%


Page 19 of 26


C. Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3):

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite

State Priority: Pupil Engagement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5):

High school dropout rates; andHigh school graduat ion rates

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17)Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17)

Parents at Margaret Heath are provided w ith various opportunit ies to part icipate at the school site. Parents can part icipate in educat ional workshops, monthlyparent meetings (Coffee w ith the Principal), School Site Council meet ings, and ELAC meetings. In addit ion, parents are encouraged to volunteer at the schoolsite and attend a variety of special events throughout the school year. Parents are informed and reminded of our meetings and special events through ourmonthly calendar, school marquee, Connect Ed phone messages, and flyers. We have a School Community Liaison who works closely and diligent ly w ith thecommunity and our parents to ensure that they are kept informed throughout the school year and feel connected to the school.


Page 20 of 26



State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6):

Pupil suspension rates;Pupil expulsion rates; andOther local measures on the sense of safety

School Safety Plan (School Year 2016-17)

Suspensions and ExpulsionsSuspensions and Expulsions


Rate 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Suspensions 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.8 1.8 1.4 4.4 3.8 3.7

Expulsions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

Suspensions

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0School Suspensions

District Suspensions

State Suspensions

Expulsions

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12School Expulsions

District Expulsions

State Expulsions

Margaret Heath Elementary has a well-developed comprehensive school safety plan. The plan is reviewed and updated annually by staff members and parents.Our plan is reviewed and approved by our School Site Council and then submitted to the Risk Management Department at the District office yearly for final reviewand approval. The key elements of our safety plan are, but not limited to: child abuse, emergency and disaster procedures, suspension policies, harassment, dresscode, discipline, safe routes, and other related policies and protocols. There is a copy of our comprehensive safety plan in our school office, and parents wereinformed that this plan is accessible to them.

The purpose of our safety plan is to provide a safe and posit ive learning environment for our students. We are dedicated to providing supervision throughout theschool day so that our students feel safe at all t imes. We maintain a closed campus, and all visitors must check in at the office before entering. Our staff membersare all familiar w ith our school’s safety plan and emergency procedures.


Page 21 of 26



D. Other SARC InformationThe information in this sect ion is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorit ies for LCFF.

Note: Cells w ith NA values do not require data.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2015-16)

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17)Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17)

Indicator School District

Program Improvement Status In PI In PI

First Year of Program Improvement 2006-2007 2008-2009

Year in Program Improvement Year 5 Year 3

Number of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 19

Percent of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 95.0%

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Grade Level Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+

K 16.0 5 2 0 13.0 7 0 0 19.3 2 2 0

1 17.0 2 2 0 16.0 2 3 0 20.6 2 1 0

2 17.0 3 2 0 16.0 4 0 0 22.3 1 3 0

3 21.0 1 2 0 16.0 2 3 0 18.6 2 1 0

4 20.0 1 2 0 21.0 2 0 1 33.5 0 0 2

5 18.0 3 1 0 14.0 3 1 0 30.5 0 2 0

6 19.0 2 1 0 22.0 1 2 0 36.5 0 0 1

Other 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 2.0 2 0 0

Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor 0.0 0.0

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0.0 N/A

Library Media Teacher (librarian) 0.0 N/A

Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) 0.0 N/A

Psychologist 0.5 N/A

Social Worker 0.0 N/A

Nurse 0.2 N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.0 N/A

Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.0 N/A

Other 1.0 N/A


Page 22 of 26




*One Full T ime Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full t ime; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full t ime.


Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)

LevelTotal Expenditures Per

PupilExpenditures Per Pupil

(Supplemental/Restricted)

Expenditures PerPupil

(Basic/Unrestricted)Average Teacher

Salary

School Site $6507.5 $300.3 $6207.1 $89759.9

District N/A N/A $6146.1 $82420.0

Percent Difference – School Site andDistrict

-- -- 1.0% 6.1%

State N/A N/A $5677.0 $74216.0

Percent Difference – School Site and State -- -- -36.6% 8.9%


Page 23 of 26


For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Cert ificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2015-16)Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2015-16)

Local Control Funding Formula

The local control funding formula (LCFF) establishes base, supplemental, and concentrat ion funding. These fundings replace many of the former state categoricalprograms. Supplemental and Concentrat ion grants go to help high needs students: English Language Learners, low-income students and foster youth. Schooldistricts have greater flexibility, than in the past, to decide how to use the funds w ith input from their local communit ies. Budgets are t ied to improvement goalsin the district ’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP).

Federal – T it le I Schoolw ide Program

Tit le I funding is provided to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality educat ion and meet state standards.The T it le I Schoolw ide Program is based on the premise that comprehensive reform strategies rather than separate, add-on services are most effect ive in raisingacademic achievement for the lowest achieving students in a school.

Federal – T it le II

T it le II, Part A, Teacher and Principal Training and Recruit ing is a federal categorical program for the purpose of increasing the academic achievement of allstudents by helping schools and district (1) improve teacher and principal quality through professional development and other act ivit ies and (2) ensure all teachersare highly qualified.

Federal – T it le III

The main priority of T it le III is for limited-English-proficient (LEP) students (called English learners under California laws), including immigrant children and youths, toattain English proficiency and meet the same challenging academic content and achievement standards that other students are expected to meet.

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary $49,102 $44,958

Mid-Range Teacher Salary $68,513 $70,581

Highest Teacher Salary $94,068 $91,469

Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $111,954 $113,994

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $112,715 $120,075

Average Principal Salary (High) $123,818 $130,249

Superintendent Salary $203,766 $218,315

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 42.0% 38.0%

Percent of Budget for Administrat ive Salaries 5.0% 5.0%

Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart


Page 24 of 26

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/


Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

Average Principal Salary

(Elementary)


(Middle)


(High)

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000


Page 25 of 26


Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development

Districtw ide areas of focus include Professional Learning Communit ies, Response to Intervent ion, and Posit ive Behavioral Intervent ions and Supports. All teacherspart icipate in professional development of Common Core strategies including rigor, collaborat ion, communicat ion, crit ical thinking, and creat ivity to promotestudent success in 21st century careers during weekly Common Meeting t imes, grade level collaborat ion, workshops, inservices and professional developmentdays. Professional development act ivit ies are supported by teacher observat ions, principal classroom visits, and outside coaching opportunit ies.

NUMBER OF DAYS PROVIDED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE MOST RECENT THREE YEAR PERIOD

2014-15…2 Professional Development Days, 3 Shortened Days, 31 Common Meeting T ime Days2015-16…2 Professional Development Days, 3 Shortened Days, 34 Common Meeting T ime Days

2016-17..2 Professional Development Days, 3 Shortened Days, 34 Commont Meet ing T ime Days


Page 26 of 26

Documents

SARC Report for Margaret Heath Elementary - Edl€¦ · The staff at Margaret Heath Elementary continuously strives to ensure that all students are proficient on the California State