37
Developing Research Capacity in Initial Teacher Education: A New Approach to Early Professional Learning Martin Hagan St. Mary’s University College Belfast Paper presented at the 6 th Teacher Education Advancement Network (TEAN) Conference Conference Aston Birmingham 13-14 May 2015

Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Developing Research Capacity in Initial Teacher Education: A New Approach to Early Professional

LearningMartin Hagan

St. Mary’s University CollegeBelfast

Paper presented at the 6th Teacher Education Advancement Network (TEAN) Conference

Conference AstonBirmingham

13-14 May 2015

Page 2: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

A long time ago…

Page 3: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)
Page 4: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

A model of teaching and learning which had not really changed…

Forward in time…

Page 5: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

The Problem

Page 6: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Practice-focused? Built on relevant educational research?

Linking theory

and practice?Helping to link

between professional and

academic phases?

Focused on

learning?NOSahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Page 7: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

The research-teaching nexus (Adapted from Healey 2005: 70)

Research-tutored

Curriculum emphasises learning focussed on students writing and discussing essays

Research-based

Curriculum emphasises students undertaking inquiry-based learning

Research-led

Curriculum is structured around teaching subject content

Research-oriented

Curriculum emphasises teaching processes of knowledge construction

Students as audience

Students as participants

Emphasis on content Emphasis on process

Page 8: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Theoretical framework

Instructional, didactic

paradigm (Bar and Tagg,

1995)

Learning paradigm

(Bar and Tagg, 1995)

Engaged Learning

paradigm (Hodge, Marcia

and Hayes, 2009)

DependenceIndependence and ‘Self-authorship’

Page 9: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

A potential solution

Page 11: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

What is a capstone module?

• The capstone module acts as an integrative and culminating module and is central to the student being able to demonstrate the high-level skills and knowledge required to earn a degree-level qualification

Guide to the European Capstone Module (2007:iii)

A SYNTHESIS PROJECT

Page 12: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

How could it benefit students?

Capstone projects will help students

to:

• enhance organisational, planning and project management skills;

• work independently and autonomously even if engaged in a joint or group project;

• retrieve, analyse and evaluate information;• develop confidence in proposing original ideas,

interpretations and solutions;• apply the knowledge and understanding they have

acquired across the complete BEd programme.

Page 13: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

What did we need it to do?

• include issues and problems which are relevant to the programme of study i.e. the BEd degree;

• relate to a theoretical base;• be sufficiently focussed to allow

for the development of depth in the work;

• have a manageable timescale.

The capstone project had to:

Page 14: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

How could we get it started?

• Students could generate their own project ideas

• Staff could provide a list of project ideas/titles/suggestions

There were two ways in which a

topic could be selected

Project refinement would involve discussion and negotiation between students and staff to ensure that the project was realistic, achievable and valid

Page 15: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

What about Supervision?

The capstone project is ‘owned’ by the student

The supervision of the project is based on a

partnership between the supervisor and the

student

The responsibility for the learning is borne largely by the student

with the supervisor acting in a supportive

role

Key principles

Page 16: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Output criteriaCONTINUUM

Single, research-based project

• Theory-supported empirical research

• Secondary-source, review-based studies

• Conceptual or theory-based research

Product-based output

• To include a supporting manual or Evaluation of the design process• Learning resource• Piece of software• Prototype• Web-based

product

Page 17: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Assessment of the European Bachelor Capstone European Capstone Module, Pg. 20

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding in a field of study

Demonstrate an ability to apply their knowledge in a professional and appropriate manner

Demonstrate higher-level competences appropriate to the academic field or vocation

Demonstrate the ability to gather relevant data and to interpret these to inform judgements on relevant social/scientific/ethical issues

Demonstrate that they can communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions in a clear and concise manner

Demonstrate that they have developed the learning skills to undertake the study with a degree of autonomy

Page 18: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Practice-focused? Built on relevant educational research?

Linking theory

and practice?Helping to link

between professional and

academic phases?

Focused on

learning?YesSahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Page 19: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

The Process of Change

Page 20: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Issues for consideration

Student preparatio

n and managing student and staff anxiety

Timing

Selection of

supervisors

Supervision process

Integration of Capstone

principles throughout the whole

programme

Page 22: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Guidance bookletsA Guide for Students

A Guide for Supervisors

Page 24: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

TimeframePERIOD EVENT

BEd 3 – Semester 2Jan and April/May

Understanding the Capstone Project Short programme on educational research methods

BEd 3 – MayConsultation with potential supervisor/sPreparation of Capstone research proposalSubmission of research proposal in Week 26Allocation of supervisor/s

BEd 3 - May First brief meeting with supervisor/s

BEd 4 - October First formal meeting with your supervisor/s

BEd 4 – October - DecemberFurther consultation meetings School visits if requiredDevelopment of projects

BEd 4 - January Submission of Capstone Projects

Page 25: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

The Outcome

Page 26: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Evaluation - Overall

Survey was conducted using SurveyMonkey following submission of the projects 68%

Response

86% ‘An excellent/very good learning experience’

Page 27: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Evaluation – Level or preparation

59%‘I felt very/fairly well prepared to

undertake my project’

I wasn't sure what was expected and the

lecturers didn't seem to have a coherent

understanding of what was wanted

As it was new it took me time to understand

what was required

Page 28: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Evaluation - Supervision

14%‘I met with my supervisor

once a month’

86% ‘I met with my supervisor either once a week or once

a fortnight’

Page 29: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Evaluation – Supervision

91%‘I found my Capstone

supervision to be excellent/very good’

We had some of our meetings as a class group which was

really good because we could all ask questions and some

people had thought of things that I maybe hadn't

[My supervisor…] was fantastic and had a real

interest in my project

Page 30: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Evaluation – Knowledge and understanding

95%’my knowledge and understanding

of my research topic improved well or very well’

90%’my knowledge and understanding of educational research improved

well or very well’

Page 31: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Evaluation – Knowledge and understanding

Capstone gave me a deep insight into my chosen topic - very

worthwhile!

I feel it will be good to discuss

it in job interviews.

it showed me new research methods and

give me a great understanding of the

research process

It was also very useful on Teaching Practice for those

who created a Resource Pack. Other teachers were

very impressed by the amount of work carried out

Page 32: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Staff reaction

I still think the secondary students

need a stronger focus on their

subject

I really thought this was going to damage the

integrity of the work of the (subject) department but I’ve been amazed at how well the students

have bought into this. It’s actually enhanced what

we do

This has changed the whole way we think about how we

work.

There is so much at stake here. Supervision is very

time-consuming but I feel I need to keep a close eye on how the

students are getting on in case there’s a problem

Page 33: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

External examiner

…It looks as if there have been gains in learning from personalising the curriculum to students’ own learning journey….The fact that this assignment familiarises students with the language of professional

enquiry means that even more ordinary examples of the assignment mean that all student teachers share a common language about

professional development which will have important consequences for the future strengthening of learning in the teaching profession in

Northern Ireland.

Dr Beth Dickson, University of Glasgow

Page 34: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Further developments

3 students published inTEAN STeP Journal Vol.1

(1) 2014

Winner of the George Berkley Gold Medal in the category of Education by the international

awarding body Undergraduate Awards

5 students published inTEAN Educators’

Storehouse

46 students presented their papers at the first

STRE@M Conference

Page 35: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Useful resources

• University of Gloucester - Rethinking Final Year Projects and Dissertations: Creative Honours and Capstone Projects

http://insight.glos.ac.uk/TLI/ACTIVITIES/NTF/CREATIVEHOPS/Pages/default.aspx#

• Guide to the European Capstone Module – Lifelong Learning Programme

http://ave.dee.isep.ipp.pt/~mbm/capstone/files/Capstone-Guide-Final_EN_V2.pdf

Page 36: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)
Page 37: Sahlberg, Broadfoot, Coolahan, Furlong, and Kirk (2014)

Thank you and over to you…

Thoughts