29
1 Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 June 2016

Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

1

Safeguarding Children

Annual Report

2015-16

June 2016

Page 2: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

2

CONTENTS:

1 Purpose of Report Page 3

2 Safeguarding Context Page 3

3 Key Professionals Page 5

4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6

5 Haringey Safeguarding Children Board (HSCB) Page 8

6 Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP) Page 10

7 Safeguarding Monitoring of Haringey Providers Page 11

8 Haringey Looked After Children (LAC) Page 12

9 Safeguarding Monitoring of Haringey General Practices Page 14

10 Safeguarding Monitoring of Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group (HCCG) Page 15

11 Reviews and Audits Page 15

12 Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) Page 16

13 HCCG Safeguarding Strategy Page 17

14 Progress against Objectives 2015-16 Page 19

15 Key Objectives 2016-2017 Page 30

Page 3: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

3

1. Purpose of Report 1.1 The purpose of this annual report is to:

Set the context for safeguarding children in Haringey Provide an overview of the arrangements in place to safeguard and protect

children across health services in Haringey Demonstrate how Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group (HCCG), is fulfilling its

safeguarding children statutory responsibilities Report on governance and accountability arrangements within the HCCG and the

provider health organisations including representation to and involvement in the Haringey Safeguarding Children Board (HSCB)

Identify progress made against recommendations from Serious Case Reviews (SCRs)

Highlight service developments and significant issues and report on progress of the team’s 2015/16 objectives

Agree the safeguarding team’s objectives for 2016/17 1.2 The report will cover the period from 1st April 2015 to 31st March 2016.

2. Safeguarding Context 2.1 National Context 2.1.1 Safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children is defined in “Working Together to

Safeguard Children” (2015) as:

Protecting children from maltreatment Preventing impairment of children’s health or development Ensuring that children are growing up in circumstances consistent with the

provision of safe and effective care Taking action to enable all children to have the best outcomes

2.1.2 Effective safeguarding arrangements must be underpinned by two key principles:

Safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility: for services to be effective each professional and organisation should play their full part

A child-centred approach: for services to be effective they should be based on a clear understanding of the needs and views of children

2.1.3 Section 11 (s11) of the Children Act (2004) provides statutory guidance on the

arrangements required to safeguard and promote the welfare of children which all agencies need to take account of when creating and maintaining an organisational culture and ethos that reflects the importance of safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. At an organisational or strategic level, these key features are ensuring:

Senior management commitment to the importance of safeguarding and promoting children’s welfare

A clear statement of the agency’s responsibilities towards children; available for all staff

A clear line of accountability within the organisation for work on safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children

Service development that takes account of the need to safeguard and promote welfare and is informed, where appropriate, by the views of children and families

Page 4: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

4

Staff training on safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children for all staff working with or (depending on the agency’s primary functions) in contact with children and families

Safe recruitment procedures in place

Effective inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children

Effective information sharing

2.1.4 “Safeguarding Vulnerable People in the Reformed NHS - Accountability and Assurance Framework” (2013) was revised during 2014/15 and published on 2nd July 2015 entitled: “Safeguarding Vulnerable People in the NHS – Accountability and Assurance Framework” (2015). It defined the safeguarding responsibility and duty of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) as follows:

CCGs as commissioners of local health services need to assure themselves that

the organisations from which they commission have effective safeguarding children arrangements in place. CCGs are responsible for securing the expertise of Designated Professionals on behalf of the local health system. The Designated Professionals undertake a whole health economy role. It is crucial that Designated Safeguarding Children Professionals play an integral role in all parts of the commissioning cycle, from procurement to quality assurance if appropriate services are to be commissioned that support adults at risk of abuse or neglect, and children, as well as effectively safeguard their well-being

Safeguarding forms part of the NHS standard contract (service condition 32) and commissioners need to agree with their providers, through local negotiation, what contract monitoring processes are used to demonstrate compliance with safeguarding duties

CCGs must gain assurance from all commissioned services, both NHS and

independent healthcare providers, throughout the year to ensure continuous improvement. Assurance may consist of assurance visits, section 11 audits and attendance at provider safeguarding committees

CCGs are also required to demonstrate that they have appropriate systems in

place for discharging their statutory duties in terms of safeguarding children. These include:

A clear line of accountability for safeguarding children, properly reflected in

the CCG governance arrangements, i.e. a Named Executive Lead to take overall leadership responsibility for the organisation’s safeguarding arrangements

Clear policies setting out their commitment, and approach, to safeguarding children including safe recruitment practices and arrangements for dealing with allegations against people who work with children as appropriate

Training their staff in recognising and reporting safeguarding children

issues, appropriate supervision and ensuring that their staff are competent to carry out their responsibilities for safeguarding

Effective inter-agency working with local authorities, the Police and Third

Sector organisations including appropriate arrangements to cooperate with Local Authorities in the operation of Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCB) and Health and Wellbeing Boards (HWBs)

Ensuring effective arrangements for information sharing

Page 5: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

5

Employing, or securing, the expertise of Designated Doctors and Nurses for Safeguarding Children and for Looked After Children and a Designated Paediatrician for unexpected deaths in childhood

The role of CCGs is also fundamentally about working with others to ensure that critical services are in place to respond to children and adults who are at risk or who have been harmed, and it is about delivering improved outcomes and life chances for the most vulnerable.

CCGs need to demonstrate that their Designated Clinical Experts (children), are embedded in the clinical decision making of the organisation, with the authority to work within local health economies to influence local thinking and practice.

2.1.5 Haringey CCG fulfils and is compliant with these safeguarding children responsibilities

and duties and this Annual Report will demonstrate how the CCG has ensured this, during the period of 01/04/15 to 31/03/16, within its own organisation and across the organisations from which it commissions.

2.1.6 NHS England conducted a series of deep-dive exercises across CCGs’ arrangements

and in 2015, one of the areas of focus was safeguarding. The results of this process was reported in February 2015 and they acknowledged the extent of focus and commitment to safeguarding within Haringey CCG. A more detailed breakdown of the results of this deep dive exercise can be found in the “Review, Inspections and Audits” section of this report.

2.2 Local Context 2.2.1 Haringey is an exceptionally diverse and fast-changing borough with a population of

267,540 according to 2014 Office for National Statistics Mid-Year Estimates. 51.1% of the population are male and 49.9% are female. Almost two-thirds, and over 70% of young people, are from ethnic minority backgrounds, and over 100 languages are spoken in the borough. The population is the fifth most ethnically diverse in the country.

2.2.2 The borough ranks among the most deprived in the country with pockets of extreme

deprivation in the east. Haringey is the 30th most deprived borough in England and the sixth most deprived in London.

2.2.3 There are approximately 63,400 children and young people under 20 living in Haringey

(approximately one third of the total population). The wards with the largest number of people aged under 20 in Haringey are: Seven Sisters, Northumberland Park, White Hart Lane and Tottenham Hale. There are more children in the east of Haringey, which has higher levels of deprivation than the west.

2.2.4 For more information about Haringey’s population visit:

http://www.haringey.gov.uk/social-care-and-health/health/joint-strategic-needs-assessment-jsna

Haringey’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) 2014/2015 describes the health, care and wellbeing needs of the local population. This helps the CCG and Haringey Council commission the best services to meet those needs.

3. Key Professionals

3.1 Haringey CCG Safeguarding Team and Arrangements

3.1.1 Between 01/04/16 and November 2015 the Haringey CCG Safeguarding Children Team consisted of:

Page 6: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

6

Assistant Director of Safeguarding and Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children

(full-time)

Designated Doctor Safeguarding Children and Unexpected Death in Childhood (5

sessions per week)

Deputy Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children (full-time)

Named GP Safeguarding Children 3 sessions per week 3.1.2 From 02/11/15 a restructure within the CCG’s Quality Directorate saw the following

changes to the HCCG Safeguarding Children Team:

The Assistant Director of Safeguarding and Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children role was deleted

An Assistant Director of Quality and Nursing (full-time) was created

A full time Designated Nurse for Safeguarding Children was created.

Vacancies within the team were covered by an Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children whilst the new substantive post was recruited. The substantive Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children commenced in post in March 2016 3.1.3 The period started with the team having a full-time administrator. The team

administrator left the organisation in May 2015. The Safeguarding Team was supported by Directorate administrative staff shared with the Governance team; thus requiring a prioritisation of the deployment of this resource and safeguarding administrative functions.

3.1.4 The progress of the team’s workplan related to the HCCG Safeguarding Strategy

(originally ratified by the HCCG Quality Committee in December 2013) was reviewed quarterly by the HCCG Safeguarding Team throughout 2015-16; and six-monthly within this period by the HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting and HCCG Quality Committee.

4. Governance and Statutory Arrangements 4.1 Haringey CCG (HCCG)

4.1.1 HCCG is the major commissioner of local health services across the borough and is

responsible for safeguarding quality assurance through contractual arrangements with all provider organisations. Designated Professionals, as clinical experts and strategic leaders, are a vital source of advice to the CCG, NHS England, the Local Authority and the Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board (HSCB). They also provide advice and support to multi-agency health professionals.

4.1.2 The Chief Officer for HCCG is the Executive Lead for Safeguarding and is responsible

for ensuring that the health services’ contribution to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children is discharged operationally and effectively across the health economy via local commissioning arrangements.

4.1.3 The Executive Nurse and Director of Quality and Integrated Governance HCCG reports

appropriate safeguarding children risks and achievements to the Chief Officer and is responsible for ensuring that safeguarding monitoring across Haringey takes place through the Quality Committee of the HCCG Governing Body; the Clinical Quality

Page 7: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

7

Review Groups (CQRG) for each of the three main provider Trusts; and in conjunction with the Haringey Safeguarding Children Board (HSCB).

4.1.4 HCCG’s Governing Body Lead General Practitioner for children is responsible for

ensuring that the Governing Body takes account of safeguarding children when making decisions regarding the commissioning of services. He chairs the HCCG Safeguarding Children Commissioning Group, which reports on a quarterly basis to the Quality Committee.

4.1.5 The HCCG Safeguarding Team produced a joint Safeguarding Children and Adult Briefing for each of the bi-monthly Quality Committees informed by the safeguarding work across the organisation and with Provider organisations through the Designated Professionals’ attendance at the Providers’ Safeguarding Children Committees. This briefing and the HCCG safeguarding arrangements and leadership were discussed and monitored via the quarterly HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meetings.

4.1.6 The Designated Doctor and Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children (newly established Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children from November 2015) provide support and assurance that safeguarding arrangements, training and supervision is in place across the health community.

4.1.7 The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Child Protection provided

individual supervision for the:

Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children Deputy Designated Nurse Named GP Safeguarding Children Haringey Community Services Named Nurse

4.1.8 The Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (BEH-MHT) and North

Middlesex University Hospital Trust Named Nurses receive supervision from the Enfield CCG Designated Nurse.

The Designated and Named Doctors employed by Whittington Health receive monthly supervision facilitated by Dr Sebastian Kraemer Hon Consultant CAMHS.

4.1.9 Haringey’s Designated Doctor and Named GP attended monthly peer review/support sessions facilitated by a child and adolescent consultant psychiatrist.

4.1.10 The Designated Professionals and Named GP attended quarterly peer supervision

sessions with Pan-London Designated Professional colleagues – facilitated by NHS England (London). The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children chaired this Pan-London group until her change in role in November 2015.

4.1.11 The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Child Protection, Interim

Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children and the Deputy Designated Nurse participated in additional six-weekly peer supervision and information sharing sessions with the Designated Nurses of Barnet, Enfield, Camden and Islington.

4.1.12 The Designated and Named Professionals also met with:

Partners from the Local Authority Children and Young Peoples Services (CYPS), the Police Child Abuse Investigation Team (CAIT) and Community Paediatricians to discuss key safeguarding issues effecting safeguarding across the partnership

Named Professionals across the Health economy and Looked After Children (LAC) Designated Professionals for health safeguarding children meetings to consider the effectiveness of the Health response to safeguarding children across the borough, prepare for safeguarding inspection and enable peer support and supervision

Page 8: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

8

Child Protection Lead GPs

5. Haringey Safeguarding Children Board (HSCB) 5.1 The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children,

Designated Doctor, and Named GP were full and active members of the HSCB; regularly attending and contributing to the bi-monthly meetings. The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children and Designated Doctor were also full and active members of the HSCB Executive.

5.2 The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children briefed

the Executive Nurse and Director of Quality and Integrated Governance regularly to ensure that she, in turn, could keep the Chief Officer and Governing Body appraised of HSCB developments and key issues.

5.3 The HCCG Safeguarding Team ensured that there was an HSCB update included in

the Safeguarding Briefing to the bimonthly Quality Committee. 5.4 The following Haringey healthcare providers were expected to provide Director-level

representation on the HSCB:

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (BEH-MHT) North Middlesex University Hospital Trust (NMUH) Whittington Hospital NHS Trust (Whittington Health) (WH) The following illustrates the attendance of the respective Provider Trust Directors (Executive Leads for Safeguarding) at the HSCB Board Meetings across the period reviewed:- (Yes) indicates did attend or did send a representative (Rep). (No) indicates did not attend or did not send a rep

Figure 1: Health Attendance at HSCB meetings 2014/15 (7 meetings held):

Health Representation

2015 Meetings Attendance 2016 Meetings Attendance

Total Attendance

Haringey Health Services

13/05

08/07

16/09

* 07/10

18/11

28/01

27/04

Number Attended

% Attended

HCCG Assistant Director Safeguarding & Designated Nurse for SG children

Yes (Rep)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Seven

100%

HCCG Designated Doctor

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Six

86%

NHSE (London) Named GP

**No

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Three

43%

BEH-MHT (Director / Rep)

Yes (Dir)

Yes (Dir)

No No No Yes (Rep)

Yes (Rep)

Four 57%

Page 9: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

9

NMUH (Director / Rep)

Yes (Rep)

Yes (Rep)

No Yes (Rep)

No Yes (Rep)

*** No Four 57%

WH (Director / Rep)

No (Rep)

No (Rep)

Yes (Dir & Rep)

No (Reps x2)

No (Rep)

Yes (Rep)

Yes (Rep)

Seven 100%

*07/10/15 was an Extraordinary LSCB Board Meeting* **2015 Named GP obtained Post GraduateTeaching Certificate in Primary care (contact days coincided with the LSCB meetings) *** Non-attendance due to Junior Doctors Strike 5.5 The Designated Doctor Safeguarding Children, Assistant Director Safeguarding /

Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children, Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children and Deputy Designated Nurse were members of the following HSCB sub-groups which supported the HSCB during 2015/16:

Figure 2: Designated Professional Coverage of Haringey Safeguarding Children Board

Subgroups:

HSCB Subgroup

HCCG Representative

Quality Assurance and

Best Practice - name of

group changed in June 2015 to Performance and Practice Outcomes

Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children

Serious Case Review (SCR)

Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children

Designated Doctor Safeguarding Children Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding

Children

Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP)

Designated Doctor Safeguarding Children

Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE)

Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children (Chair until March 2016)

MASH Board Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children

Training & Development Deputy Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children

Page 10: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

10

5.6 The Assistant Director Safeguarding / Designated Nurse for Safeguarding Children continued in the capacity of Vice Chair of the HSCB throughout this period, as well as chairing the CSE Subgroup (which developed the borough’s CSE Strategy and Action Plan) and Vice Chairing the Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) Strategic Group; with the Interim Assistant Designated Nurse and latterly the Deputy Designated Nurse attending the VAWG Commissioning and Harmful Practices Groups.

6. Child Death Overview Panel (CDOP)

6.1 As the year in question has only just closed, this is a preliminary report and, as such,

subject to change. The system was piloted in 2007/8 and fully functional from 2008/9. A full report on the scheme from 2008/9 will be prepared later in the year. In 2015/16, there were 24 deaths of children, normally resident in Haringey. For many of these, final post mortem reports, inquests or other proceedings are still in progress. The table below describes the children who died by their age and provisional diagnosis. These have not yet been confirmed by the CDOP.

Table 1

Age <28 days 28 days <1 year

1 year <5 years

5 years <18 years

Cause of Death

Deliberately inflicted injury, abuse or neglect

11

Malignancy 1 2

Acute medical or surgical condition

Chronic medical condition 12 13

Chromosomal, genetic and congenital anomalies

1 2 1

Perinatal/neonatal event4 6 2

Sudden Unexplained Infant Death 24

As yet unascertained 1 2 1

TOTAL 8 10 6

1. This youth was fatally stabbed just short of his 18th birthday. He was known to social

services and the youth justice system. A serious case review is being undertaken.

2. This infant died from cardiac disease secondary to unrecognised vitamin D deficiency. His

older sister had already been treated for this condition. His mother misunderstood

information given about vitamin D deficiency and only took supplements herself. The

importance of vitamin D deficiency and the availability of free supplements, to those who

need them, is being emphasised to healthcare professionals and the leaflet for parents

has been revised. Coincidentally, national information is being put in all red books

(Personal Child health Records).

3. A young person ingested a constituent of food to which she was known to be allergic and

subsequently died. The exact circumstances are yet to be made clear.

4. In one instance the mother was known to have taken up smoking after delivery, having

ceased during the pregnancy.

During the year, there were eight rapid response meetings in relation to unexpected deaths, as

well as three meetings of the CDOP panel itself.

Page 11: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

11

7 Safeguarding Monitoring of Haringey Providers 7.1 All health providers are required to have effective arrangements in place to safeguard

vulnerable children and to assure the CCG, as commissioners, these are working.

These arrangements included:

Safe recruitment Effective staff training Effective supervision arrangements Working in partnership with other agencies All providers ensuring they have a Named Doctor and a Named Nurse for

Safeguarding Children (and a Named Midwife if the organisation provides maternity services)

GP practices to have a lead for safeguarding, who should work closely with the Named GP and Designated Professionals.

7.2 “Safeguarding Vulnerable People in the NHS – Accountability and Assurance Framework” (2015) defines the safeguarding responsibility and duty of Health Providers as follows:

All staff, whether they work in a hospital, a care home, in general practice, or in

providing community care, and whether they are employed by a public sector, private or not-for-profit organisation, have a responsibility to safeguard children at risk of abuse or neglect in the NHS

Health providers are required to demonstrate that they have safeguarding leadership, expertise and commitment at all levels of their organisation and that they are fully engaged and in support of local accountability and assurance structures, in particular via the LSCBs and in regular monitoring meetings with their commissioners

Health providers must ensure staff are appropriately trained in safeguarding

children, Prevent and Domestic Violence at a level commensurate with their role and in line with the Intercollegiate Document (2014). It is strongly recommended that safeguarding forms part of any mandatory training in order to develop and embed a culture within their organisation that ensures safeguarding is acknowledged to be everybody’s business from “the board to the floor”

All health providers are required to have effective arrangements in place to

safeguard children at risk of abuse or neglect and to assure themselves, regulators and their commissioners that these are working.

7.3 The three main Provider Trusts all held internal bi-monthly Safeguarding Children

Committees which were all attended by a member of HCCG Safeguarding Children Team.

7.4 BEH-MHT proposed a change for the Safeguarding Children bi-monthly Committee,

by joining the children and adult agendas to form one quarterly Joint Safeguarding Committee. The first Joint Safeguarding Committee meeting will be held April 2016. The effectiveness of the Trust Joint Safeguarding Committee will be monitored as part of the terms of reference (TOR) annual review.

7.5 The meetings provide an opportunity for information sharing on all aspects of

safeguarding children. Any issues arising that required escalation were discussed with HCCG Senior colleagues and within the Haringey CCG Safeguarding Children Assurance meeting as appropriate.

7.6 The Provider safeguarding children dashboards/metrics/balanced scorecards were

monitored quarterly at the Clinical Quality Review Groups (CQRGs) and by exception

Page 12: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

12

at the HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting and HCCG Quality Committee.

7.7 In addition to each Trust having specifically-tailored safeguarding children training,

there were several sources of more general and subject-specific training available for Haringey health professionals:

Multi-agency one-day courses via HSCB Lunchtime learning sessions via HSCB E-learning via HSCB E-learning produced by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

7.8 The availability of these opportunities was disseminated via a range of methods including emails, HSCB website and HCCG intranet; with provider organisations also further considering methods of dissemination to attempt to achieve increased completions, compliance and learning. 8.0 Haringey Looked After Children (LAC) 8.1 CCGs have an ongoing responsibility for ensuring that the health needs of LAC are met.

In Haringey the statutory Initial Health Assessments (IHAs) and the Review Health Assessments (RHAs) are carried out by a specialist team – the Children in Care (CiC) Team who are employed by Whittington Health and commissioned by Haringey CCG.

8.2 Children In Care Team (CIC)

8.2.1 The Designated Doctor and Nurse in the Children in Care team host the 2015 reconstituted Monthly Operational group (MOM). The MOM was reconstituted to improve collaboration across the agencies in relation to Children in Care. Together with Social Care, the Vulnerable Children’s Commissioner and First Step psychological service, the group reviews relevant Children in Care pathways and outcomes, and works towards implementing changes. It provides a forum to raise systemic challenges and explore innovative ways of working.

8.2.2 The current priority is to improve the emotional health of Children in Care. The progress of the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (“CAMHS”) transformation plan is discussed at each MOM meeting and the following actions have been agreed:

A handbook for Social Workers with information and contact details for relevant mental health services is in development.

Specific training for Social Workers and Foster Carers in recognising mental health concerns, services available and information on how to refer to services is in development. This will be for existing staff and future training is to be part of the Social Worker & Foster Carers induction programme.

The emotional needs of children should be considered when plans are made for long term placement and permanency for the children. The Independent Reviewing Officers (IRO’s) have been asked to read any First Step reports and are encouraged to liaise with them especially when there are concerns regarding the young person’s understanding of their life story and whether they need additional therapeutic input.

First Step plus is a new service being piloted to work with children and their carers in unstable placements who have experienced three or more placement moves.

Page 13: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

13

8.2.3 The Designated Nurse for CiC attends the Corporate Parenting Committee and the CSE subgroup. At the Corporate Parenting Committee, the Designated Nurse for CiC meets with members of Aspire1 and councillors. Performance and statistics are shared and scrutinised. Plans are underway to work with Aspire to increase the number of children and young people involved in service development, to ensure that the views of Children in Care are considered.

8.2.4 CSE subgroup - the focus is to discuss CSE but the remit of the group has been increased to consider a wider range of vulnerabilities and risk factors in recognition of the interconnectedness and particularly risks associated with young people who are missing from placement or have run away, trafficking, gangs and serious youth violence. All members of the Children in Care health team attend CSE meetings in relation to children with whom they are involved.

8.3 Initial Health Assessments (IHA)

8.3.1 The IHAs are all carried out by paediatric staff. The national standard is for all children and young people to have their IHA within 20 days of children entering care. This has not always been possible due to a variety of reasons such as:

a delay in being notified of a child entering care

the Social Worker cancelling a booked appointment

some young people refusing to attend During the year there had been an improvement in receiving notifications of children entering care and moving placement. During quarter 4 not all notifications were received and we became aware of children new into care by scrutinising the monthly returns received from the Information analysis via social care. We have discussed this with the Operational group and will continue to monitor, escalate where necessary and report back to the CCG Safeguarding and Assurance Committee.

8.3.2 The Children in Care Team are working towards ensuring that every child has a Strength and Difficulties (SDQ) questionnaire completed at the point of entering care. Support is given by the carers in completing this to ensure that the information is available as early as possible for First Step.

8.3.3 117 IHA’s were completed this year and 3 out of borough assessments. A service level agreement has been drawn up with the placing Clinical Commissioning Group and payment received for conducting the out of borough assessments. Overview health reports are now compiled for young people that refused to attend or did not attend, to ensure that concerns regarding health are identified and risks assessed. The Children in Care Team may attend a multi-agency meeting if necessary in order to develop a protection plan. In addition, 25 children were seen with an adoption care plan. The medical advisor meets any prospective adopters of Haringey children to ensure that they are apprised of developmental or learning needs, and will also incorporate information about their emotional health. The medical advisor attends the monthly Haringey adoption panel where prospective adopters are approved and matches of Haringey children are approved.

8.4 Review Health Assessments (RHA)

1 Aspire is a youth-led group for young people in care and leaving care in Haringey.

Page 14: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

14

8.4.1 383 RHAs were completed, and 12 out of borough assessments for children placed in Haringey. 17 RHA’s were not completed (10 young people refused and the remaining 7 are planned for April).

8.4.2 The Designated professionals attend Whittington Health Safeguarding meetings as

required, and also work across borough with Islington and Hackney to ensure that systems and processes are peer reviewed and of an agreed quality.

9.0 Haringey GP Practices 9.1 Safeguarding Monitoring of Haringey General Practices 9.1.2 From 1 April 2013 NHSE assumed responsibility for commissioning and performance

monitoring of Primary Care Services. CCGs maintained a duty to support NHSE with the quality assurance of these services.

9.1.3 HCCG Safeguarding Children Team continue to drive improvements in the quality of

Primary Care safeguarding children services offering advice and support to independent practitioners. Technology such as the HCCG Intranet, the GP Bulletin and practice emails were used to highlight and disseminate learning. Practice visits and face-to-face or phone advice and support were used as opportunities to reinforce understanding and improve the quality of safeguarding children practice.

9.1.4 Level 1 and 2 training was available via e-learning and Haringey Safeguarding Children

Board. 9.1.5 The Level 3 annual two and half hour bespoke GP training programme continued and

was led by the Named GP supported by the HCCG Safeguarding Children Team. This offers bespoke face-to-face training to all Haringey GPs in groups with a maximum of 30 participants. The training programme is developed new each year and is run in yearly cycles from autumn to the following summer. The sessions covered local and national issues and alerted GPs awareness to lessons learned from Haringey Serious Case Reviews. The 2015-16 training specifically related learning to a Haringey/Islington SCR review: Child O, particularly the child protection significance of self-harming children, personality disorder in adults and its impact on children.

In 2016/17 HCCG Safeguarding Children Team intend to continue the training programme.

9.1.6 Promoting effective safeguarding children in GP practices requires understanding of

the current landscape of General Practice and providing appropriate motivation, information and support with context in mind. It is positive that GPs in the level 3 training sessions are informed and interested. It remains a concern the low number of reports from GPs to child protection conference. An audit in 2015 found of those GPs invited to conference 31% provided a report and 91% of GPs were invited to the conference. The quality of reports was reviewed and less than half, 38%, were considered adequate or better. Various actions have been taken as a result of this audit. The information has been presented at all 4 collaborative meetings, 2015-16 Level 3 GP training sessions and in HCCG briefings. The information relevant to Children and Young People services was shared with them. Practices with a low submission of reports were contacted directly and asked to review their systems and practice. The audit will be repeated in 2016 to assess impact of the feedback.

9.1.7 The bi-monthly GP Child Protection Leads meetings, originally commenced in

November 2013, continued and were facilitated by the Named GP and either the Designated Doctor or Assistant Director for Safeguarding / Designated Nurse. They were interactive sessions during which cases/issues were brought for discussion. The last meeting was in May 2015 and had poor attendance. GPs were canvassed about whether the meetings added value and the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive

Page 15: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

15

but it was flagged the timing of meetings and location were important for regular attendance. The meetings are planned to restart in June 2016 and will rotate through the four collaboratives to encourage attendance of Lead child protection GPs as well as other interested GPs across the borough.

10 Safeguarding Monitoring of Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group

(HCCG) 10.1 The HCCG Safeguarding Children Designated Doctor and Nurses and Named GP met

1-2 monthly. This provided an opportunity to share good practice, update each other on any developments and monitor the implementation of work plans.

10.2 Training data for 2015-16 10.3 Figure 3: HCCG Safeguarding Training Compliance across the required levels as

of 31/03/16:

11 Reviews and Audits

11.1 NHS England Safeguarding Deep Dive

During 2015/16 NHS England conducted a series of Deep Dive assurance

exercises and one of the priority areas focused upon was safeguarding.

The HCCG Safeguarding Team prepared evidence prior to attendance by the HCCG Chair, Governing Body Lead for Children, Executive Nurse & Director of Quality and Integrated Governance and Assistant Director of Quality and Nursing at a meeting to discuss HCCG evidence in response to Key Lines of Enquiry (KLOEs) regarding safeguarding arrangements and assurance.

The following results were received from NHS England in February 2016:

- Governance, Systems, Process - Overall Outcome - Good - Workforce - Overall Outcome - Good - Capacity Levels in CCG - Overall Outcome - Good - Assurance - Overall Outcome - Good

11.2 Haringey Safeguarding Children Board Multi-agency Audits

The HCCG led the Health involvement within the following HSCB Multi-agency

themed audits: - Q1 - Voice of the Child - Q3 - Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) Diagnostic Exercise (comprising

audit, focus groups, case discussion and visit to Haringey MASH)

Training Type & Level

Numbers Requiring Training

Numbers Trained

Percentage Compliance

Safeguarding Children - Level 1 81 73 90%

Safeguarding Children - Level 2 23 22 96%

Safeguarding Children - Level 3 14 14 100%

Safeguarding Children - Level 4 3 3 100%

Page 16: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

16

- Q4 - Neglect (postponed from Q2 due to preparation for intensive

CSE Diagnostic Exercise)

The implementation of recommendations from these audits will be monitored by HSCB.

12 Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) 12.1 Over the period of this report, three SCRs were published by the Haringey

Safeguarding Children Board. These were:

Child CH SCR concerned the murder by CH then aged 15, of a young man (Mr Z) who was unknown to him, in a residential street.

Child O related to the death of a 15 year old young person who took her life on a train track. A multi-agency HSCB-led learning event is planned focusing on the journey of the child through mental health services

Child D related to the abuse of a young child

12.2 Outlined below are learning and actions as a result of recent SCRs:- 12.2.1 Child CH has highlighted the need to ensure that all Child Protection Conferences

receive an effective report from the child’s GP.

12.2.2 The post-audit actions to increase awareness and learning and to improve submission rates and quality of GP reports to conference have included the following:

Distribution and report to GPs the findings of the audits Highlight practices with systems in place that enabled increased rates of report

submission Inclusion of the audit and its findings within the 2015-16 GP L3 Safeguarding

Children Training Programme Provision of “model” GP reports to Child Protection Conference to ensure clarity

regarding expectations of timeliness and quality of completion The HCCG Safeguarding Team plans to re-audit in 2016-17 to measure the

impact of the awareness raising and training on the provision and quality of GP information shared with Child Protection Conferences

12.2.3 Child T (an SCR published in 2013) highlighted the need to strengthen GP / Health

Visitor Liaison Meetings. The HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting and the Whittington Health have received a very positive audit indicating an improved position regarding GP/Health Visitor Liaison meetings and impact on communication and information sharing.

12.2.4 Child O identified delays in the commissioning of services and in follow up and co-

ordinated action on multi-agency risk assessment. The SCR has also highlighted the need to better educate and enable staff to work with children and young people who self-harm and address the impact on them and their families. As well as the planned multi-agency HSCB-led learning event focusing on the journey of the child through mental health services there has been joint work and discussion, monitored via the HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting to clarify the escalation mechanisms

Page 17: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

17

for clinical and commissioning teams in the event of multi-agency disagreement in relation to treatment and commissioning decisions and options.

12.3 A proposal from the HCCG Designated Professionals regarding increasing the learning from Haringey SCRs in combination with a recent Local Authority (LA) review into historical SCRs has led to planned workshops for frontline staff across the borough which will roll-out across 2016-17 and positively focus on increasing their learning, engagement and involvement.

13 HCCG Safeguarding Strategy 13.1 The HCCG Safeguarding Team has reviewed the 2013-2016 HCCG Safeguarding

Strategy and produced a Draft HCCG Safeguarding Strategy: 2016-2019. 13.2 The process of review has included the following:

Inclusion of updated and revised safeguarding children legislative framework and guidance

Consideration of the layout/design of the Strategic document and how its strategic

priority areas link with the more operational objectives within the Safeguarding Team Workplan

13.3 Whilst elements of the 2013-2016 Strategy have been retained, the proposed 2016-

2019 Strategy looks different to the previous version to achieve the following:

To consider the most optimal length, layout, accessibility and use of the document to ensure enhanced effectiveness

To ensure that the document is strategic with the more operational aspects to be

covered in the Workplan objectives that will be intrinsically linked and sit beneath the Strategic Aims and Priorities

To ensure it is reflective of all relevant legislation and guidance (referencing these

but not detailing elements of them within the document)

To ensure that the Safeguarding Strategy is informed by and linked to the HCCG Vision as well as the priority areas identified by NHSE, CQC and the Haringey LSCB and SAB

To acknowledge the background and context of the high profile national

safeguarding reviews and their importance but to keep sight of the fact that all safeguarding concerns and incidents are significant and to maintain a forward-looking approach

To identify a manageable and achievable number of priority areas that each

Workplan objective can be mapped and measured against in terms of how and when achieved

The 3-Year Strategy will detail how it will be reviewed and a detailed annual work

plan will be produced based on milestones and objectives. 13.4 The Safeguarding Team will map these and produce the final version for approval at

the June 2016 Quality Committee prior to planned June 2016 launch and implementation.

Page 18: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

18

14.0 Progress against Objectives 2015-16

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

14.1 To ensure that all children in care are seen for their Initial Health Assessment (IHA) within 4 weeks of moving into care

100% of children in care will be seen for IHA

Exception reports will be completed for IHA

completed outside this deadline with plan to address

non-compliance

IHA target will be monitored via the quarterly HCCG

Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting

Largely Met

The Children in Care Team reported improvements within the Local Authority system regarding the timely notifications of children entering care and the achievement of those children receiving IHA within four weeks

The Children in Care Designated Professionals submitted regular reports to the HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting and Whittington Health Safeguarding Children committee updating on progress and compliance

The IHA and RHA target will continue to be monitored via the quarterly HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting

14.2 To actively participate in collaboration with other agencies in the Local Authority-led review and strengthening of effectiveness of the

HCCG will ensure attendance and active

participation in the recently re-established Haringey

MASH Board

HCCG will facilitate and monitor relevant provider

Health attendance at the MASH Board and will agree

Largely Met

The HCCG was represented by the Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children at the Haringey MASH Board

Page 19: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

19

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Haringey MASH and ensure appropriate Health representation within

the daily MASH

HCCG will ensure that expectations and operational

protocols are clear for Health staff within the MASH

and Health agencies referring into the MASH

HCCG will monitor the MASH data to assess the

impact of referral into MASH

The HCCG ensured appropriate provider Health representation at the MASH Board; specifically following up with BEH-MHT to ensure mental health input from Summer 2015 and planning with the Named GP Safeguarding Children the updating and strengthening of GP Child Protection Lead information and contact details to be provided to the Whittington Health Safeguarding Advisors (Health Representatives) within the MASH.

The Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children reviewed the revised MASH Operating Protocol and has recommended (prior to MASH Board sign-off) a strengthening of the sections relating to; involvement of and feedback to Health staff within the MASH (as well as feedback across the wider partnership) and escalation.

These recommended amendments are in line with learning from a Serious Case Review and the visit to the Haringey MASH by the review team that led the CSE Diagnostic Exercise completed in November 2015; this should increase clarity and consistency of understanding of the process within the MASH and how this fits with the revised Local Authority Children’s Service Structure (now comprising of the Single Point of Access (SPA), the MASH and

Page 20: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

20

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Early Help)

With the Protocol in the final stages of sign-off the partnership will need to ensure across 2016-17 that there is a robust and visible communication and implementation plan to ensure that all staff working across the borough are clear and consistent in their understanding and practice within these systems

14.3 To request assurance from non NHS providers of children’s services commissioned by HCCG that they have taken all required action in response to the findings from the Savile Inquiries

In conjunction with the Children’s Commissioner the

Safeguarding Team will ensure the HCCG has

assurance from all provider organisations against the

initial Department of Health and subsequent 14

recommendations from Lessons Learned from “NHS

Investigations into Matters Relating to Jimmy Savile”

February 2015

Assurance will be based on receipt of response,

strength of evidence provided with the response,

clarity of policies and protocols across organisations

Measurement of staff awareness and use of policies

and protocols in practice will be assessed via

provider audit

Met

The HCCG Safeguarding Team worked with the HCCG Commissioning Team to ensure that all non-NHS Providers provided responses and assurance against the Department of Health and subsequent 14 recommendations from the Lessons Learned from “NHS Investigation into Matters Relating to Jimmy Savile” (Lampard, February 2015)

The HCCG was assured by what was submitted regarding policies and protocols now in place across these organisations. This was monitored via regular reviews of the HCCG Safeguarding Workplan

Page 21: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

21

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

HCCG monitoring and assurance will be through

quarterly HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance

Meeting and via commissioning meetings with

providers

Further audit work by in relation to impact on staff practice of these policies and procedures may be further assessed and measured by provider audits across 2016-17

Strength of policy to practice and impact of safeguarding arrangements were also considered within commissioning review meetings with Providers and there was evidence of effective joint working, support and challenge of Providers by the HCCG Safeguarding and Commissioning Teams

Concerns following CQC Inspections and LADO cases involving Providers were also managed and followed up by the joint working of the HCCG Safeguarding and Commissioning Teams leading to increased scrutiny of the safeguarding practice and care provision of certain Providers; as well as the use of appropriate of contract levers

14.4 To work across the partnership to identify an effective response to reduce the risk of children experiencing FGM

The HCCG will contribute to the achievement of the

Harmful Practice Working Group Objectives:

Development of a Haringey Multi-agency Harmful

Met

The HCCG were represented at the Harmful Practice Working Group by the Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children and

Page 22: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

22

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Practices Action Plan

Increase in staff awareness through attendance

at FGM training

Consider (with public health colleagues) the use of

education to inform practicing communities of the

adverse health impact of FGM to reduce the risk of

this practice being perpetuated.

then, by the Deputy Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children; working with the wider partnership to ensure increased clarity of arrangements, services and development of the Harmful Practices Action Plan (reporting to the Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) Strategic Group to address, prevent and respond to harmful practices (including FGM) across the borough

Health staff awareness of FGM was increased via: - Inclusion of FGM in the GP L3 Safeguarding

Children Training Programme (2014-15 and 2015-16)

- Bespoke FGM training delivered to the Haringey Practice Nurses Forum

- Establishment of the NMUH FGM (Iris) Clinic

There was an increase in focus across the borough in the use of education to inform practicing communities of the adverse impact of FGM and awareness of the “FGM Passport” also increased during this period

14.5 To review and revise the Haringey CCG Safeguarding Children

Review existing policy against revised “Working

Together to Safeguard Children” (2015) and London

Met The HCCG Safeguarding Children Policy was

revised in line with the following:

Page 23: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

23

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Policy in line with national and Pan-London guidance; including consideration with the Named GP regarding policy and procedure implications for General Practices

Child Protection Procedures” (2015)

Review by asking selection of HCCG staff for

feedback on existing policy and what they want from

a new policy to inform revisions

Complete first draft by end of August 2015

Present draft revised policy to October 2015 HCCG

Quality Committee for ratification

Launch policy to HCCG staff following ratification

- Working Together to Safeguard Children (2015)

- London Child Protection Procedures (5th Edition, 2015)

- Safeguarding Vulnerable People in the NHS – Accountability and Assurance Framework (NHSE, 2015)

- NHSE Safeguarding Policy (2015) - HCCG Incident and Serious Incident Policy

(2014) - HCCG Information Governance Policy

(2015) - HCCG Policy for Policies (2013)

HCCG staff contributed to the review by

considering the previous (2013) HCCG Safeguarding Children Policy and where they felt it could be strengthened

The revised policy was ratified by the HCCG Quality Committee in December 2015, sent to the Haringey Safeguarding Children Board and launched and shared with HCCG staff via the CCG Intranet Site and staff briefing

14.6 To review and revise the Haringey CCG Safeguarding Children Training Strategy to

Review current training strategy against revised 3rd

Edition of Intercollegiate Document (2014)

Met The HCCG safeguarding children training

strategy was reviewed against the 3rd Edition of the Intercollegiate Document (2014)

Page 24: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

24

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

ensure compliance with the 3rd Edition of Intercollegiate Guidance; including a review of design and delivery of Provider Safeguarding Children Training

Review the design and delivery of training

programme informed by 2014-15 training programme

evaluations

Propose submission of all provider training programs

/ presentation via the Training Subgroup of LSCB

Propose peer evaluation across Health provider

organisations monitored through the Health

Safeguarding Children Learning and Quality Group

and Training Subgroup of Board

Assess the impact of training on practice via audit

and triangulation of existing performance data

(HSCB annual training return)

Compare 2015-16 to 2014-15 evaluations of training

An evaluation of the 2014-15 GP L3

safeguarding children training informed the review of the design and delivery of the 2015-16 training programme and continued to include important changes to national and local safeguarding guidance and arrangements and was informed by key learning from recent Serious Case Reviews

Evaluations from the 2015-16 sessions continued to be positive in terms of the quality of the content, delivery and relevance to practice

A safeguarding children training proposal paper was presented to the HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance Meeting and informed the decision to continue the delivery of the annual GP L3 safeguarding children training given the added value and assurance it was felt to provide. This paper also clarified the CCG reporting structure of this training; based on the three-yearly compliance requirement referenced within the Intercollegiate Document (2014).

14.7 To deliver bespoke Safeguarding Children training for the HCCG Governing Body at a

Design training based on Intercollegiate Document

requirements and learning aims

Bespoke Board level safeguarding children training for the HCCG Governing Body was designed at the start of the reporting period by the Interim Assistant Designated Nurse

Page 25: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

25

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Governing Body Seminar during 2015-16

Book slot on forthcoming Governing Body Seminar

Deliver training to Governing Body

Request feedback to inform effectiveness of training

and impact on learning and awareness

Safeguarding Children in line with the Intercollegiate Document (2014) guidance

The Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children delivered the session, which was well-received and evaluated by Governing Body members, at the March 2016 Governing Body Seminar

14.8 To oversee the implementation of the IRIS Project in partnership with the Primary Care Team

Scope IRIS implementation nationally and in

neighbouring boroughs to inform project plan

Meet with Primary Care Team to establish and agree

requirements, implementation plan and resources

In conjunction with Primary Care Team produce

Project Plan to enable timely implementation and

roll-out across the borough

Set annual targets of number of the 25 practices to

be recruited across the three–year roll-out period

Ensure IT program is provided for identified practices

Recruit to Advocator Educator and Clinical Lead

roles

Met

The IRIS Project plan was drawn up in

Sept/Oct 2015.

The Service Specification for the AE was agreed with input from the Designated Doctor and Nurse for Safeguarding Children, HCCG Head of Primary Care Quality and Development and the Interim Strategic Violence against Women and Girls Lead in Haringey Council.

25 GP Practices were identified as possible practices to be involved with the IRIS project based on areas of highest known prevalence of domestic abuse.

Page 26: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

26

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Decide on Key Performance Indicators for the IRIS

project

Complete an end-of-year evaluation of progress

against Project Plan

Expressions of interest letters were sent to all Haringey GP practices in March 2016.

Links were made with the Haringey Local Authority Domestic Abuse (IDVA) Service Procurement Process to ensure a joint procurement process to develop a more seamless service and pathway across the borough. The preferred provider - Nia - was approved by Haringey council in March 2016.

14.9 Increase GP awareness and compliance regarding the provision of timely and high quality reports to Child Protection Conferences

Increase GP awareness of previous audit findings

regarding poor compliance in providing GP reports to

Conferences

Further and continued audit focussing on the

following areas:

Was the GP invited via email?

The number of days between invitation and

Conference – was enough notice given?

Did the GP send the report as requested?

Met

The Haringey Named GP Safeguarding Children and Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children completed qualitative and quantitative (respectively) audits and found that reports have not always been submitted to the Child Protection Conferences by GPs across the borough and where they have the quality of the report was not always of the required standard.

The post-audit actions to increase awareness and learning and to improve submission rates and quality of GP reports to conference have

Page 27: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

27

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

Was the report completed in a way that

informs the Conference?

Did the GP receive the post-conference

minutes and plans?

This will ensure increased focus on GP engagement

with Child Protection Conferences and offer the

opportunity to support GPs; acknowledging

improvement as well as addressing any non-

compliance and establishing the cause and how to

improve. It will also better inform discussions with

Local Authority colleagues regarding the timeliness

of invitations and notice given when requesting

reports.

included the following: - Distribution and report to GP the findings of

the audits

- Highlight practices with systems in place that enabled increased rates of report submission

- Inclusion of the audit and its findings within

the 2015-16 GP L3 Safeguarding Children Training Programme

- Provision of “model” GP reports to Child Protection Conference to ensure clarity regarding expectations of timeliness and quality of completion

- The HCCG Safeguarding Team plans to re-

audit in 2016-17 to measure the impact of the awareness raising and training on the provision and quality of GP information shared with Child Protection Conferences

14.10 In partnership with the LSCB, ensure significant focus on strengthening individual and organisational learning in practice from Serious Case Reviews

Focused review considering the following:

Whether the recommendation action plans

have been successfully completed

How recent SCRs have actually affected

practice; and the impact and outcomes for

Partly Met

A proposal from the HCCG Designated Professionals regarding increasing the learning from Haringey SCRs in combination with a recent Local Authority (LA) review into historical SCRs has led to planned workshops for frontline staff across the borough which will roll-out

Page 28: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

28

Objectives 2015-16

Objective

KPI / Measurement / Monitoring

Progress

children and young people

As well as reflecting upon the previous SCRs,

the CCG will incorporate research on whether

nationally SCRs have historically made a

difference to practice and how this can inform

the ways in which organisations and their

staff embed learning in practice

across 2016-17 and positively focus on increasing their learning, engagement and involvement

Page 29: Safeguarding Children Annual Report 2015-16 Papers/20160728/… · 2 Safeguarding Context Page 3 3 Key Professionals Page 5 4 Governance and Statutory Arrangements Page 6 5 Haringey

29

15 Key Objectives for 2016-17 The key objectives for 2016-17 are taken from objectives that have not been

fully met within 2015-16 as identified in the Annual Report. A detailed workplan will be created to support the delivery of the objectives and regularly monitored at the HCCG Safeguarding Children Assurance meeting

The objectives are identified as follows:

15.1 To actively participate in collaboration with other agencies in the strengthening of

effectiveness of the Haringey MASH. To ensure the adoption of a robust communication and implementation strategy across the Haringey partnership so that MASH and revised Local Authority Children’s Services (SPA, MASH and Early Help) are fully understood and functional across all staff.

15.2 To seek further assurance regarding the impact of the policy and procedure response

from non NHS Providers to Savile. 15.3 HCCG and HSCB quality assurance and peer review framework for Provider

Safeguarding Children Training. 15.4 Increase GP compliance regarding the provision of timely and high quality reports to

Child Protection Conferences 15.5 To oversee the implementation of the IRIS Project in partnership with the Primary Care Team. 15.6 In partnership with the LSCB, ensure significant focus on strengthening individual and

organisational learning in practice from Serious Case Reviews 15.7 In collaboration with HCCG Safeguardig Adult Lead develop a HCCG Prevent Training

Strategy to accompany the HCCG Prevent Strategy.

Authors: Matt Beavis Interim Assistant Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children Pauline Fletcher Designated Nurse Safeguarding Children and Young People June 2016