Upload
lacy-faulkner
View
36
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Safe Routes to School Program Presentation. Border to Border Conference November 15, 2012 Ponciano N. Longoria P.E. C.F.M City of Edinburg – Director of Public Works. Barriers to walking and bicycling to school. Community Design. Safety. Time and Convenience. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Safe Routes to School Program Presentation
Border to Border Conference
November 15, 2012
Ponciano N. Longoria P.E. C.F.M
City of Edinburg – Director of Public Works
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Barriers to walking and bicycling to school
CommunityDesign Safety
Time andConvenience
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Reasons to do a Safe Routes to School Program
Reasons to do a Safe Routes to School Program
Increasedphysicalactivity
Improvedpedestrian
skills
Communitydesign
Less relianceon automobile
More socialinteraction
Increasedindependence
Decreasedneighborhood/school traffic
Reduced fearof crime
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
The Need for Safe Routes to School1. Fewer kids today walk
and bike to school
2. Unintended consequences have resulted
3. SRTS programs can be part of the solution
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
1. Fewer kids are biking and walking More parents are driving
1969 200948% walked or biked 13% walked or biked
12% driven 44% driven
(U.S. DOT, 2009)
Parents driving their children to school account for up to 25% of morning rush hour traffic.
(Parisi Associates, 2003; Morris, 2001)
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
2. What are the unintended consequences of less walking and bicycling?
1. Physical Inactivity:• Prevalence of overweight children has tripled-
Nationally there are 25 million obese or overweight children!
• Sharp increase in cases of Type 2 Diabetes in children.
2. Poor Air Quality • Asthma rates have increased 160% in
the past 15 years in children.
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Safe Routes to School Programsa Key to the Solution Develop the Plan - Steps to start
a SRTS Program1. Identify people who want to make walking & bicycling to school safe and appealing for children.
2. Share concerns, interests, & knowledge among a variety of community members with diverse expertise can enable groups to tackle many different issues.
3. Hold a kick-off meeting-two main goals: to create a vision & generate next steps.
4. Gather information & identify issues-collecting information can help to identify needed program elements & provide a means to measure the impact of the program later.
5. Identify solutions-to issues identified by the group will include a combination of education, encouragement, engineering & enforcement strategies.
6. Develop a SRTS Plan-include all 5 E’s, time schedule, & map
7. Get the Plan & people moving-There are things that can be done right away without major funding?
8. Evaluate, adjust & keep going-after beginning, careful monitoring will identify which strategies are working well & which are not going as planned.
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
What is a SRTS Plan?1. Describes existing
conditions
2. Identifies existing problems
3. Proposes solutions
4. Describes coordination efforts
5. Details evaluation methods
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
1.Describes Existing Conditions• Location of School(s)• Environment type (urban, suburban, rural)• Enrollment• Type of school (elementary/middle)
• Student participation data (# of students, % students within 2 mi, % of students walking or biking, potential walking/biking outside 2 mi), % participating in free or reduced lunch prgm)
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
2.Identifies Existing Problems• ID current walking & bike routes to school (include
graphic representation-pictures), highlights potential for improvement
• Current travel modes including student survey results (including walk, bike, bus, auto)
• Detailed analysis of existing conditions & impediments to safe biking/walking (physical barriers, safety issues, awareness)
• Traffic, safety, & other relevant data including citations, crashes, injuries and/or fatalities, if applicable
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
3.Proposes Solutions• ID program “champion” person(s) to spearhead the
effort
• ID team or action committee that will develop/implement the plan & subsequent projects or activities
• ID stakeholders-parents, students, teachers, elected officials & how they might contribute to development or execution of the plan
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
4.Describes Coordination Efforts• Policy Statement defining intent/mission
• Outreach & publicity strategy
• Responsibilities & tasks for enacting plan
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
5.Details Evaluation Methods• Activities to monitor, review & update
process• How initiatives will be sustained• Methods & measures of success for the
strategies
• Reference to or inclusion of a non-motorized master plan or similar document
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
SRTS Joint Program Projects Awarded
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
SRTS Phase I School Name Engineering
Design AwardConstruction Award
Total Project
Eisenhower Elementary / Memorial Middle School $38,414.82 $370,000.00 $408,414.82
Monte Cristo Elementary / Villarreal Elementary $32,223.88 $380,760.00 $412,983.88
De Zavala Elementary $40,846.26 $381,900.00 $422,746.26
Truman Elementary $40,611.11 $382,870.00 $423,481.11
Guerra Elementary $37,845.19 $382,600.00 $420,445.19
B.L. Garza Middle School $53,436.50 $380,900.00 $434,336.50
Austin Elementary $38,769.12 $372,650.00 $411,419.12
Lincoln Elementary $41,610.37 $369,875.00 $411,485.37
Total Funding $323,757.25 $3,021,555.00 $3,345,312.25
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
SRTS Phase II School Name Engineering
Design AwardConstruction Award
Total Project
South Middle School $50,592.09 $380,470.00 $431,062.09
Robert E. Lee Elementary $39,201.31 $382,960.00 $422,161.31
Harwell Middle School $41,299.99 $382,560.00 $423,859.99
Freddy Gonzalez Elementary $37,380.63 $382,560.00 $419,940.63
De la Vina Elementary $37,706.51 $382,560.00 $420,266.51
L.B. Johnson Elementary $34,507.24 $381,480.00 $415,987.24
Norma Linda Trevino Elementary $54,273.88 $380,760.00 $435,033.88
Jefferson Elementary $42,747.47 $381,480.00 $424,227.47
Canterbury Elementary $34,506.38 $380,470.00 $414,976.38
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
SRTS Phase II (cont.)School Name Engineering
Design AwardConstruction Award
Total Project
Jose De Escandon Elementary $49,634.08 $381,490.00 $431,124.08
Cano Gonzalez Elementary $30,475.72 $378,960.00 $409,435.72
San Carlos Elementary & J.F. Kennedy Elementary
$37,866.58 $381,070.00 $418,936.58
Travis Elementary $40,371.93 $373,360.00 $413,731.93
Carmen Avila Elementary $37,941.64 $382,200.00 $420,141.64
Thomas Esparza Elementary & Betts Elementary $38,970.56 $371,360.00 $410,330.56
Cayetano Cavazos Elementary $30,549.31 $286,870.00 $317,419.31
Total Funding $637,855.35 $5,990,610.00 $6,628,465.35
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Totals SRTS Phase I & IITotal ECISD Schools 27 Campuses
Total Miles of New Sidewalk 33.65 Miles
Total ADA New Ramps 634 Ramps
Total Crosswalks (New/Upgrade) 11 Crosswalks
Total New School Beacons 70 Beacons
Total New Bike Racks 161 Bike Racks
Total Engineering Design Award $921,612.60
Total Construction Award $9,012,165.00
Total Project $9,973,777.60
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt
nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.
Ponciano N. Longoria P.E. C.F.M.
Director of Public Works
City of Edinburg
415 W. University Dr.
Edinburg, Texas 78540
(956) 388-8210