Upload
costas-sachpazis
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
1/11
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATEPUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE
EUROCODE 2
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
2/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
INDEX
DESCRIPTION
CHECKS1.- Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations) 3
2.- Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations) 5
3.- External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistentsituations) 7
4.- Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2)) 9
5.- Clear distance between two isolated consecutive bars 9
6.- Distance between the support's face and the first punching shearreinforcement 10
7.- Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcement perimeters 108.- Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction 11
9.- Distance between the support's external face and the outermost barinclined at 45 11
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
3/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpaziCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
DESCRIPTION
CHECKS
1.- Zone adjacent to the suppo
The worst case design forces occuThe following criteria must be sati
Where:
vEd: Design value of the sheevRd,max: Design value of thecontrol section considered.
The design value of the sheer strefrom the following expression (EN
Where:
VEd: Design value of the
Ed Rd,maxv v
Ed
Ed
0
Vv
u d
=
,
-
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
alculation of the punching shear perimeters
Perimeter of th
u0:
Critical perime
u1:
xG:
yG:W1x:
W1 :
Punching shear
uout,ef:
xG:
yG:
Wout,ef,x:
Wout,ef,y:
rt or load (Persistent situations)
for load combination 1.35SW+1.35DL1+1.5 fied:
r stress along the control section considered.aximum punching shear resistance along the
ss along the control section considered is obtai1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5):
applied shear force.
Page 3 - 11
e support (C1)
1600 mm
er
4362 mm
0 mm
0 mm19163.6 cm
19163.6 cm
reinforcement perimeter
5031 mm
0 mm
0 mm
51487.8 cm
51487.8 cm
LL1.
2.43 MPa 4.50 MPa
vEd: 2.43 MPa
vRd,max: 4.50 MPa
ed
vEd: 2.43 MPa
VEd: 756.75 kN
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
4/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
Page 4 - 11
: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). : 1.13
kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensionscy(dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx(dimension in direction of thex-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). kx: 0.60
ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cx(dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy(dimension in direction of the
y-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). k :0.60
MEdx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity ofthe critical perimeter u1. MEdx: 58.65 kNm
MEdy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity ofthe critical perimeter u1. MEd : 12.30 kNm
MEdOx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity ofthe column. MEdOx: 58.65 kNm
MEdOy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity ofthe column. MEdO : 12.30 kNm
u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). u1: 4362 mm
W1x: 19163.6 cm
dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length.
e : Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdxacts about.
W1y: 19163.6 cm
ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdyacts about.
u0: Verification critical punching shear perimeter of the area adjacent to thesupport or load (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5). u0: 1600 mm
d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm
The design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the control section
considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008,6.4.5):
vRd,max: 4.50 MPa
: 0.54
Where:
fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck: 25.00 MPa
EdyEdx 1 1x y
Ed 1x Ed 1y
MM u u1 k k
V W V W = + +
1u
1x y
0
W e dl=
1u
1y x
0
W e dl=
Rd,max cdv 0.5 f =
ckf0.6 1250
=
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
5/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpaziCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
fcd: Design value of thelongitudinal member axi
2.- Zone with punching shear r
The worst case design forces occuThe following criteria must be sati
Where:
vEd: Design value of the shee
vRd,cs: Design value of the pushear reinforcement along th
The design value of the sheer strefrom the following expression (EN
Where:
VEd: Design value of the: Coefficient which tak1992-1-1:2004/AC:200
kx: Coefficient which decy(dimension in directiothe x-axis) of the colum
ky: Coefficient which decx(dimension in directiothe y-axis) of the colum
MEdx: Design moment a
the critical perimeter u1.MEdy: Design moment athe critical perimeter u1.
MEdOx: Design momentof the column.
MEdOy: Design momentof the column.
u1: Critical punching sh
dl: Differential element
Ed Rd,csv v
Ed
Ed
1
Vv
u d
=
Edx
x
Ed
M u1 k
V W = +
1u
1x y
0
W e dl=
,
-
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
concrete compression force in the direction of ts.
einforcement (Persistent situations)
for load combination 1.35SW+1.35DL1+1.5 fied:
r stress along the control section considered.
nching shear resistance of a slab with punchinge control section considered.
ss along the control section considered is obtai1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3):
applied shear force.s into account the effects of load eccentricity. (, 6.4.3).
ends on the relationship between the dimension of the y-axis) and cx(dimension in directionn (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1).
ends on the relationship between the dimension of the x-axis) and cy(dimension in directionn (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1).
ound the x-axis, regarding the center of gravit
ound the y-axis, regarding the center of gravit
round the x-axis, regarding the center of gravi
round the y-axis, regarding the center of gravi
ar perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.
of the critical perimeter length.
Edy1 1y
1x Ed 1y
M uk
V W+
Page 5 - 11
hefcd: 16.67 MPa
LL1.
0.89 MPa 4.90 MPa
vEd: 0.89 MPa
vRd,cs: 4.90 MPa
ed
vEd: 0.89 MPa
VEd:756.75
kNEN
: 1.13
nsf
kx: 0.60
nsf
ky: 0.60
of
MEdx: 58.65 kNmof
MEdy: 12.30 kNm
tyMEdOx: 58.65 kNm
tyMEdOy: 12.30 kNm
.2). u1: 4362 mm
W1x: 19163.6 cm
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
6/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
Page 6 - 11
ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdxacts about.
W1 : 19163.6 cm
ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEd acts about.
d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm
The design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching shearreinforcement along the control section considered is obtained from the followingexpression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5):
vRd,cs: 4.90 MPa
Where:
vRd,c: 0.95 MPa
with a minimum value of:
vRd,c,min: 0.68 MPa
Where:
c: Concrete resistance reduction coefficient. c: 1.50
k: Coefficient which depends on the nominal depth of 'd'. k : 1.95
fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck: 25.00 MPa
l: Geometric steel area of the main tensile longitudinalreinforcement. l: 0.0132
Where:lx: Ratio in X-direction. lx: 0.0132
ly: Ratio in Y-direction. ly: 0.0132
cp: Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positivecompression), with a maximum value of cp,max. cp: 2.00 MPa
cp,max: 3.33 MPa
fcd: Design value of the concrete compression force in thedirection of the longitudinal member axis. fcd: 16.67 MPa
1u
1y x
0
W e dl=
swywd,ef
r
Rd,cs Rd,c
1
Af sin
sv 0.75 v 1.5
u
= +
( )1/3
Rd,c l ck cp
c
0.18v k 100 f 0.1= +
3 / 2 1 /2
Rd,c,min ck cpv 0.035 k f 0.1= +
200k 1 2
d
= +
l lx ly 0.02 =
cp,max cd0.20 f =
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
7/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpaziCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Asw: Total area of puncconcentric with the supp
sr: Radial distance betw
: Angle between the sh
Reference
111
111
fywd,ef: Effective design strength o
fywd: Design yield strength o
(EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008
u1: Critical punching shear perim
3.- External zone to the punchi
The worst case design forces occuThe following criteria must be sati
Where:
vEd: Design value of the shee
vRd,c: Design value of the pushear reinforcement along th
The design value of the sheer strefrom the following expression (EN
Where:
VEd: Design value of the
: Coefficient which tak1992-1-1:2004/AC:200
ywd,ef ywdf 250 0.25 d f = +
ywd ywkf 0.8 f =
Ed Rd,cv v
Ed
Ed
out,ef
Vv
u d
=
Edx
x
Ed
M u1 k
V W = +
,
-
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
ing shear reinforcement within a permieterort or loaded area.
een two concentric perimeters of reinforcement
ear reinforcement and the plane of the slab.
Asw(mm)
sr(mm)
(degrees)
2262 80 45.0
2262 80 45.0
f the punching shear reinforcement.
the shear reinforcement.
, 6.2.3(3))
ter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2).
ng shear reinforecement (Persistent situat
for load combination 1.35SW+1.35DL1+1.5 fied:
r stress along the control section considered.
ching shear resistance of a slab without punchie control section considered.
ss along the control section considered is obtai1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5):
applied shear force.
s into account the effects of load eccentricity. (
, 6.4.3).
Edyout,ef out,ef
y
out,ef,x Ed out,ef,y
M uk
V W+
Page 7 - 11
.
Asw/sr(cm/m)
282.8
282.8
fywd,ef: 305.00 MPa
fwd: 320.00 MPa
fywk: 400.00 MPa
u1: 4362 mm
ions)
LL1.
0.72 MPa 0.95 MPa
vEd: 0.72 MPa
ngvRd,c: 0.95 MPa
ed
vEd: 0.72 MPa
VEd: 756.75 kN
EN
: 1.05
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
8/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
Page 8 - 11
kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensionscy(dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx(dimension in direction ofthe x-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). kx: 0.60
ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensionscx(dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy(dimension in direction ofthe y-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). k : 0.60
MEdx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity ofthe critical perimeter uout,ef. MEdx: 58.65 kNm
MEdy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity ofthe critical perimeter uout,ef. MEd : 12.30 kNm
MEdOx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravityof the column. MEdOx: 58.65 kNm
MEdOy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravityof the column. MEdOy: 12.30 kNm
uout,ef: Critical punching shear perimeter outside the reinforced zone (EN1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5). uout,ef: 5031 mm
Wout,ef,x: 51487.8 cm
dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length.
e : Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdxacts about.
Wout,ef,y: 51487.8 cm
ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdyacts about.
d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm
The design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching shearreinformcement along the control section considered is obtained from the followingexpression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.4):
vRd,c: 0.95 MPa
with a minimum value of:
vRd,c,min: 0.68 MPa
Where:
c: Concrete resistance reduction coefficient. c: 1.50
k: Coefficient which depends on the nominal depth of 'd'. k : 1.95
fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck: 25.00 MPa
l: Geometric steel area of the main tensile longitudinal reinforcement. l: 0.0132
out,efu
out,ef,x y
0
W e dl=
out,efu
out,ef,y x
0W e dl=
( )1/ 3
Rd,c l ck cp
c
0.18v k 100 f 0.1= +
3 / 2 1 /2
Rd,c,min ck cpv 0.035 k f 0.1= +
200k 1 2
d
= +
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
9/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpaziCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Where:
lx: Ratio in X
l : Ratio in Y
cp: Average axial strescompression), with a m
fcd: Design value othe longitudinal me
4.- Punching shear reinforcem
Where shear reinforcement is requ(9.11).
ReferenceAsw
(mm
111 113
111 113
where:
Asw: the area of a link leg (or
: is the angle between the s= 90 and sin = 1).
sr: is the spacing of shear lin
st: is the spacing of shear lin
fck: is in MPa
5.- Clear distance between two
The horizontal and vertical clear ssmin(EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008,
l lx ly 0.02 =
cp,max cd0.20 f =
( ) ( ),min 1,5 sin cos / 0,08sw r ts s +
( ) ( )( )
,min
,min
1,5 sin cos /
0,08 /
w sw r t
w ck yk
A s s
f f
= + =
l mind s
,
-
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
direction.
direction.
on the critical verification surface (positiveximum value of cp,max.
f the concrete compression force in the directiomber axis.
nt (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2))
ired the area of a link leg (or equivalent), Asw,m
)sr
(mm)st
(mm)
(degrees)w w,mi
80 33 45.0 0.0757 0.001
80 33 45.0 0.0757 0.001
equivalent).
ear reinforcement and the main steel (i.e. for
s in the radial direction.
s in the tangential direction.
isolated consecutive bars
acing dlbetween two consecutive bars should8.2(2)):
( ) ( )/ 9.11ck yk f f
Page 9 - 11
lx: 0.0132
l : 0.0132
cp: 2.00 MPa
cp,max: 3.33 MPa
offcd: 16.67 MPa
in, is given by Expression
n ww,min
0
0
ertical links
fck: 25.00 MPa
e greater than or equal to
21 mm 20 mm
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
10/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpaziCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
Where:
smin: Maximum value of s1, s
Where:
d : Maximum size of ag
max: Diameter of the t
111
111
6.- Distance between the supp
The distance between the face of tnot be greater than smax(EN 1992
Where:
d: Nominal depth of the slab.
7.- Distance between transver
The distance dlbetween consecuti1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3):
Where:
1 maxs =
2 gs 5 d= +
3s 20mm=
l maxd s
maxs 0.5 d=
l maxd s
,
-
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
2, s3.
regate.
ickest bar of the transverse reinforcement.
dl(mm)
smin(mm)
max(mm)
21 20 12
21 20 12
rt's face and the first punching shear rein
he support or loaded area and the first punchin1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3):
.
e consecutive reinforcement perimeters
e transverse reinforcement perimeters should
Page 10 - 11
smin: 20 mm
s1: 12 mm
s2: 17 mm
s3: 20 mm
d : 12 mm
max: 12 mm
orcement
g shear reinforcement should
80 mm 110 mm
smax: 110 mm
d : 220 mm
be, at most, equal to smax(EN
80 mm 165 mm
7/24/2019 Sachpazis_VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EC2 1992-1-1-2004 with NA CEN.pdf
11/11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpaziCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - [email protected]
d: Nominal depth of the slab.
8.- Distance between two cons
The distance dlbetween two cons1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3):
Where:
d: Nominal depth of the slab.
9.- Distance between the supp
This combination does not proceesupport.
maxs 0.75 d=
l maxd s
= maxs 1.5 d
,
-
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
16/01/2016
.
ecutive reinforcements in peripheral direct
cutive perimeter reinforcements should not be
.
rt's external face and the outermost bar i
since the reinforcement is located between th
GEODOMISI Ltd.Civil & Geotechnical Engi
Structural Engineering, Soil M
Engineering &Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 57
(+30) 69364257
www.geodomisi.co
Page 11 - 11
smax: 165 mm
d : 220 mm
ion
greater than smax(EN 1992-
33 mm 330 mm
smax: 330 mm
d : 220 mm
clined at 45
external faces of the
- Dr. Costas Sachpazisneering Consulting Company for
chanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation
Retaining Structures.11263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile:
2 & (+44) 7585939944,