6
DESALINATION ELSEVTER Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98 www.elsevier.com/locate/desal Cold sterilization and clarification of pineapple juice by tangential microfiltration Lucia Carneiro”, Iralla dos Santos Saa, Flhia dos Santos Gomesb, Virginia Martins Mattab, Lourdes Maria Correa Cabralb* “Food Technology Department, UFRRJ, Rodovia BR465 Km7, Seropedica, Brazil Tel./Fax +55 (21) 26821220; entails: [email protected], [email protected] hBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Av. das Americas, 29501, Guaratiba, 23020-470 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Tel. -1-55 (21) 24107435; Fax +55 (21) 24101090; emails: [email protected]; vmattaQctaa.embrapa.61; [email protected] Received 5 February 2002; accepted 25 March 2002 Abstract Pineapple is a very appreciated tropical fruit due to its unique aroma and flavour. Pineapple juice was cold sterilised and clarified by crossflow microfiltration associated with an enzymatic treatment. A tubular polyethersulfone 0.3 pm pore size membrane with effective filtration area of 0.05 m* was used in the pilot system. Ten experiments were carried out under the same operational conditions, 25°C and 100 kPa, in order to evaluate the cold sterilisation and clarification of pineapple juice by microfiltration. It was observed that the permeate flux did not change significantly after fifteen minutes of processing time. It was stabilised around 100 L/hm’. The clarification process was considered very efficient due to the great reduction of haze and viscosity, and by showing no significant changes in pH, acidity, sugar and soluble solid content of the juice. The permeate of the process was collected in sterile bottles inside a laminar flow station and kept under refrigeration (8°C) for a period of 28 d. The samples were submitted to microbiological evaluations in intervals of seven days. The microbiological analysis of the microfiltered pineapple juice showed that it was in agreement with the requirements by the Brazilian Legislation for juices and drinks. Keywords: Pineapple; Microfiltration; Sterilization; Clarification; Enzymatic treatment *Corresponding author. Presented at the International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes (ICOM), Toulouse, France, July 7-12, 2002. OOll-9164/02/$- See front matter 0 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved PII: SO0 1 I-9 164(02)00659-8

S5 -1 - Cold Sterilization and Clarification of Pineapple Juice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • DESALINATION

    ELSEVTER Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98 www.elsevier.com/locate/desal

    Cold sterilization and clarification of pineapple juice by tangential microfiltration

    Lucia Carneiro, Iralla dos Santos Saa, Flhia dos Santos Gomesb, Virginia Martins Mattab, Lourdes Maria Correa Cabralb*

    Food Technology Department, UFRRJ, Rodovia BR465 Km7, Seropedica, Brazil Tel./Fax +55 (21) 26821220; entails: [email protected], [email protected]

    hBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Av. das Americas, 29501, Guaratiba, 23020-470 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Tel. -1-55 (21) 24107435; Fax +55 (21) 24101090; emails: [email protected]; vmattaQctaa.embrapa.61;

    [email protected]

    Received 5 February 2002; accepted 25 March 2002

    Abstract

    Pineapple is a very appreciated tropical fruit due to its unique aroma and flavour. Pineapple juice was cold sterilised and clarified by crossflow microfiltration associated with an enzymatic treatment. A tubular polyethersulfone 0.3 pm pore size membrane with effective filtration area of 0.05 m* was used in the pilot system. Ten experiments were carried out under the same operational conditions, 25C and 100 kPa, in order to evaluate the cold sterilisation and clarification of pineapple juice by microfiltration. It was observed that the permeate flux did not change significantly after fifteen minutes of processing time. It was stabilised around 100 L/hm. The clarification process was considered very efficient due to the great reduction of haze and viscosity, and by showing no significant changes in pH, acidity, sugar and soluble solid content of the juice. The permeate of the process was collected in sterile bottles inside a laminar flow station and kept under refrigeration (8C) for a period of 28 d. The samples were submitted to microbiological evaluations in intervals of seven days. The microbiological analysis of the microfiltered pineapple juice showed that it was in agreement with the requirements by the Brazilian Legislation for juices and drinks.

    Keywords: Pineapple; Microfiltration; Sterilization; Clarification; Enzymatic treatment

    *Corresponding author.

    Presented at the International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes (ICOM), Toulouse, France, July 7-12, 2002.

    OOll-9164/02/$- See front matter 0 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved PII: SO0 1 I-9 164(02)00659-8

  • 94 L. Carneiro et al. /Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98

    1. Introduction

    Pineapple is one of the most appreciated tropical fruit due to its very attractive aroma and very nice flavour. The Smooth Cayenne variety is known as one of the best for juice production. Its chemical composition shows a good equilibrium between acid and sugar: 4.50; 2.21; 1.45; 0.80 wt.% sucrose, fructose, glucose, citric acid, respectively

    111. Fruit juices world market is about US$ 5.0

    billions/y, in which Brazil is responsible for 33%. Brazil is the most important of exporter in the world, and exports 50% of the total orange juice, besides of passion fruit, pineapple, banana and acerola products [2].

    There is, indeed, a crescent demand for fruit juices with the original characteristics of the fresh fruits and free from chemical additives. This results in the search of new technologies that are able to improve the sensorial, nutritional and microbiological quality of the fruit juices.

    Since thermal processes largely affect the characteristics of fruit juices, microfiltration can be an alternative to fruit juice preservation and conservation, because it does not involve the use of heat treatment. The advantages of micro- filtration in relation to the thermal processes are the use of mild temperature and pressure conditions, which maintain the nutritional quality and the sensorial attributes of the products.

    One of the disadvantages of microfiltration is the decline of the permeate flux along the pro- cessing (fouling), caused by the retention of some feed components on the membrane surface or in membrane pores. During microfiltration of pulpy juices the fouling is caused by pectins, tannins, proteins, starch, hemicellulose and cellulose. Therefore, it is important to introduce actions to minimise fouling, such as enzymatic hydrolysis prior to membrane filtration.

    The application of microfiltration process to fruit juices produces two fractions: a clarified and sterile juice (permeate) and a fibrous concentrated pulp one (retentate). The concentrated pulp can

    be pasteurised and added to the permeate sterile juice in order to obtain the reconstituted juice [3].

    Microfiltration is already applied in industrial scale for fruits like apple, pear, grape, orange and lemon [4]. In Brazil, there are few industries applying microfiltration to clarify apple, acerola, lemon and orange juices [5].

    In previous works, it was studied the influence of membrane pore size and transmembrane pressure on the clarification of pineapple juice [3,6,7]. It was verified that juice quality (Brix, pH, acidy, total sugar, colour, haze) was independent of the applied transmembrane pressure and the process used, microfiltration or ultrafiltration. The investigated microfiltration membrane presented the best permeate flux. So, the present work aimed to study the use of the microfiltration for the stabilisation and clarification of pineapple juice.

    2. Material and methods

    2. I. Material

    Pineapple from the variety Smooth Cayenne was used as raw material. The juice was obtained from the pressing of the fresh fruits in a depulping machine with a sieve of 0.8 mm and it was kept in a freezing chamber at -18C until its processing.

    2.2. Enzymatic treatment

    Before the microfiltration process, the pineapple juice was submitted to an enzymatic treatment with 0.03% (v/v) of two enzymatic preparations (Pectinex SP-L and Celuclast 1.5 L, from Novo Nordisk), at 30C for 60 min. The enzymatic treatment reduces the viscosity and the suspended solids (pulp) content of the juice, and, consequently, decreases the fouling in the microfiltration process. The hydrolysis was carried out in a stainless steel mixture tank with controlled temperature and agitation. The hydrolysis condition was defined in a previous work [3].

  • L. Carneiro et al. /Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98 95

    2.3. Microfiltration

    A tubular polyethersulfone membrane from Koch Membrane Systems with an effective filtration area of 0.05 m2 and 0.3 pm pore size was used in the pilot system. The process conditions were feed velocity of 6 m/s, temperature of 25C and applied transmembrane pressure of lOOkPa. During the process, the permeate was continu- ously collected and the retentate stream was re- circulated. The process performance was evaluated by permeate flux behaviour. The experimental design consisted of a set of ten microfiltration experi- ments in the pilot unit under the same operational conditions. After each process alkaline/acid/alkaline cleaning steps were used to recover the water permeability of the membrane (1800 L/hm2bar).

    The volumetric concentration factor (VCF) is defined as the initial volume divided by the retentate volume at any time. The retentate volume was determined by the difference between the initial feed and permeate volumes. All the processes were finished when the concentration factor was equal to 2.

    2.4. Analytical procedures

    Samples from the feed, retentate and permeate were analysed in relation to pH, titrable acidity, soluble and total solids content [8]. Instrumental colour and haze evaluations were carried out in a Hunter system [9]. Glucose, fructose and sucrose concentrations were measured by HPLC [lo].

    The permeated juice was collected in sterile bottles inside a laminar flow station and kept under refrigeration for a period of 28 d. They were submitted to microbiological evaluations in inter- vals of 7 d (total count, mould and yeast count, fecal and total coliforms counts). The microbio- logical analyses were performed in clarified juices following the methodology described in American Public Health Association [ 111.

    3. Results

    An enzymatic treatment was associated with

    microfiltration of pineapple juice to improve the filtration. The treatment consisted of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides, which are responsible for the high viscosity of the juice, as well as liquefying the non soluble polysaccharides such as non soluble pectins, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin from cell [12].

    The enzymatic treatment did not result in significant differences on the physical and chemical characteristics of the single strength and hydrolysed juices. As it was expected, the excep- tions were the viscosity and pulp content values. The average reduction of the viscosity from the single strength juice to the hydrolysed one was 29.6% and for the pulp content was 22.0%.

    Table 1 shows the main physical and chemical characteristics of the pineapple juice along all the steps of the processing: single strength (juice), hydrolysed (feed), clarified (permeate) and retentate.

    Acidity, pH and soluble solids did not change during the processing and presented average values of 0,80 w/w % citric acid, 3.7 and lO.OBrix, respectively. Glucose, fructose and sucrose con- centrations were maintained constant along the process steps, presenting average values of 5.4 w/w %, 2.4 w/w % and 2.2 w/w %, respectively. As the sugar and acid concentrations remained unchanged the microfiltered juice maintained the same flavour characteristics of the single strength one.

    It was verified an increase in the luminosity and a decrease in the haze of the permeate juice when compared to the single strength one (Table I). The pineapple juice became clearer and brighter.

    It was also observed a reduction of the pulp content in the hydrolysed juice (5.7 g/100 g) and the permeate (0.0 g/100 g) when compared to the single strength juice (7.4 g/100 g). The clarification process completely removed the suspended pulp in the permeated juice, as it was already observed by Matta et al. [2].

    Fig. 1 shows the behaviour of the permeate flux during one of the microfiltration processes. It could be separated in two steps. First there was

  • 96 L. Carneiro et al. /Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98

    Table 1 Average physical-and chemical characteristics of single strength (juice), hydrolysed (feed), clarified (permeate) and retentate pineapple juice during all the steps of microfiltration processes

    Parameters Juice Feed Permeate Retentate

    Total solids content, w/w% 10.1 10.2 9. la,c 10.6

    PH 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Acidity, w/w % citric acid 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Soluble solids, Brix 10.0 10.1 9.9 10.0 Viscosity, mPa.s 6.3 4.4b 1.1 10.4* Sucrose, w/w % 5.7 5.4 5.3 5.1 Glucose, w/w % 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.7 Fructose, w/w % 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.5 Pulp content, w/w % 7.4 5.7b 0.0 10.3* LUNTBR 16.8 17.2 97.gb 9.9 aHUNTER -0.6 -0.6 -3.8b 1.4 b 3 HUNTER 6.8 6.6 12.4b 6.2 Haze 97.2 97.3 3.3b 98.7

    Averages at the same line with different letters are different (p< 0,05, Tukey test)

    J-UNTER - luminosity (0 = black and 100 = white)

    aHNlER - (from -80 to zero = green, from zero to +lOO = red); jb,,, - (from -100 to zero = blue, from zero to +70 = yellow)

    15 min of process, and it was equal to 100 L/hm*.

    01

    0 30 60

    Processing time (min)

    90

    The main factors that contribute to the flux decay are the concentration polarisation, the pore blocking and the juice viscosity increase due to the increase of the concentration factor. The main disadvantage of microfiltration of pulpy juice is the fouling on the membrane surface, which results in the flux decline [12].

    Fig. 1. Permeate flux during a microfiltration process of pineapple juice.

    an acute decay of the permeate flux followed by a period when the flux decay was less pronounced tending to stabilisation. Other authors like Itoua Gassaye et al. [ 131 who also studied the clarification process of pineapple juice have described the same behaviour.

    The clarified juice presented a great reduction in the viscosity value due to the removal of pulp and macromolecules from the single strength juice. As observed in Table 1, the apparent viscosity value of the microfiltered juice was 1.1 mPa.s. The clarified juice presented the rheological characteristics of a Newtonian fluid (Fig. 2). The same behaviour was verified by Hemandes et al. [ 141, who studied orange juice ultrafiltration, and by Matta et al. [2] during the investigation of acerola juice by microfiltration.

    In the beginning of the microfiltration process The characteristics of the permeated juice the permeate flux was around 232 L/hm*. After showed that microfiltration was effective for the five minutes of processing, this parameter reduced commercial sterilisation of the juice. The micro- 52%. The average permeate flux stabilised after filtered pineapple juice presented microbiological

  • L. Carneiro et al. /Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98 97

    0 500 IO00 1500 2000

    Velocity gradient (s)

    Acknowledgements

    The authors wish to tank CNPq and FAPERJ for the financial support of this project.

    Fig. 2. Rheological behaviour of the clarified pineapple juice. References

    characteristics in agreement with the established patterns of the Brazilian legislation for juices and drinks. It presented the counting of moulds and yeast and of mesophilic bacteria less than 10 CFU/g, total coliforms less than 0.3 per g and absence of Salmonella in 25 g (Table 2). These parameters were maintained during the storage period. These results indicate that microfiltration can be used as an alternative process for fruit juice conservation in substitution to the thermal pasteurisation.

    4. Conclusions

    Pineapple juice was successfully clarified. Its haze changed from 97.2 to 3.4 and the luminosity from 16.8 to 97.9. The clarified product presented also commercial sterilisation grade, which fulfils the requirements of microbiological safety. The obtained results showed that the association of

    HI

    [21

    131

    [41

    [51

    AI? BartolomC, I? RupCrez and C. Ftister, Pineapple fruit: morphological characteristics, chemical co- mposition and sensory analysis of red Spanish and Smooth cayenne cultivars, Food Chem., 53 (1995) 75-79. V.M. Matta, L.M.C. Cabral and R.M. Moretti, Clarifi- cation of acerola juice by enzymatic treatment and microfiltration, Alimentaria, 309 (2000) 127-130. L. Cameiro, ES. Gomes, A.A.L. Furtado, V.M. Matta and L.M.C. Cabral, Processamento de suco de abacaxi C.V. smooth cayenne por microfiltra@o e pasteuriza@o t&mica, IV Simp6sio Latino-Americano de Ci&ncia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, 277 (2001) 1. S.S. Kijseoglu, J.T. Lawhon and E.W. Lusas, Use of membranes in citrus juice processing, Food Technol., 44( 12) (1990) 90-97. L. Cabral, Current status of the use of membrane separation technology in food processing in Latin America. Proc. Expert Consultation on Application of Membrane Separation Technology to Food Processing in Developing Countries, FAO, Part II (1997) 241-244.

    Table 2 Microbiological characteristics of the pineapple juice pasteurised by microfiltration storage at 8C for 28 d

    enzymatic hydrolysis with microfiltration can be an attractive alternative to sterilise tropical pulpy fruit juices. The use of this proposal technology can improve new trends for fruit juices market.

    Sample

    Od 7d 15 d 28 d Standard

    Total count (CFU/mL)

  • 98 L. Carneiro et al. /Desalination 148 (2002) 93-98

    161

    [71

    181

    [91

    L.M.J. Carvalho, L.M.C. Cabral, C.A.B. Silva and F.D.B. Abadio, Clarification of pineapple juice (Ananas comusus L.Mer.) by ultrafiltration. In: Simpo- sio Intemacional - Aplicacion de Tecnologias de membranas en la Industria Agroalimentaria. Lationo- americana, Quito-Equador, 13-15 Oct. 1999, p. 12. L.M.J. Carvalho, C.A.B. Silva, R. Deliza, L.M.C. Cabral and F.B.D. Abadio, Preferencia do consumidor por sucos de abacaxi clarificados. In: XVII Congress0 Brasileiro de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. 8 a 1 O/8/00, Fortaleza, Ceara. Livro de Resumos, v. ,200O. A.O.A.C. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), Official Methods of Analysis, P Cunniff, (Ed.), 16th ed., Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1997. M. Meilgaard, GV. Civille and B.T. Can; Sensory evaluation techniques, Vol. 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1987.

    [lo] R. Macrae, HPLC in Food Analysis, 2nd ed., Aca- demic Press, 1988.

    [ll] APHA, American Public Health Association, Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 2nd ed., 1984.

    [ 121 F. Vaillant, A. Millan, M. Dornier, M. Decloux and M. Reynes, Strategy for economical optimization of the clarification of pulpy fruit juices using crossflow microfiltration. J. Food Eng., 48( 1) (2001) 83-90.

    [ 1 l] S. Itoua Gassaye, A. Davin, M. Peuchot et R. Benaim, Inter&t des techniques a membrane dans la production de jus de fruits tropicaux (cas des jus clarifies dananas): levolution des flux de filtration au tours du pro&de, Fruits, 46(3) (1991) 25 l-258.

    [ 121 E. Hemandez, C.S. Chen and R.D. Carter, Viscosity changes in orange juice after ultrafiltration anda evaporation, J. Food Eng., 25 (1995) 387-396.