8/14/2019 RUBRIC-PRESENTATION (10%).docx
1/2
ITS610 Ethical, Social and Professional Issues PRESENTATION
RUBRIC (10%) Semester July Sept 2012
POOR GOOD EXCELLENTFormat/Style 1 3 points 4 6 points 7 10
points
Visual presentation of the
material; clarity of voice;
Time requirement.
Goes significantly under or over thetime-frame allotted.
Aesthetic
presentation is poor.
Limited amount of visual information. The presenters voices are
difficult to
understand.
Presenters are distracting(Pacing, stumbling over words).
Follows, for the most part, the timerequirement.
Aesthetic presentation pleasing andeasy to follow.
Visual information augments talk. Presenters have a clear voice
that is
easy to understand.
There are few distractions from thepresenters.
Closely follows the time requirement. The aesthetic presentation
is superior
and well thought out.
Content of visual information highlyaugments the talk.
Presenters have a clear, understandablevoice with no
distractions.
Content/Information 1 3 points 4 6 points 7 10 pointsThe
significant elements of
the topic are addressed andissues raised; All items are
covered; Description and
level of information on
research papers.
The talk addresses poorly the keyissues in the topic.
The provided information is notnecessary or not sufficient to
discussthe research.
All items are not completelyaddressed.
No visible interest was observed fromthe audience (questions not
really
relevant).
The talk for the most part addressesthe key issues associated
with the
research presented. The provided information is, for the
most part, necessary and sufficient to
discuss the research.
All items are completely covered. The audience's interest
was
somewhat raised.
The talk addresses exceptionally well thekey issues in the
research.
The provided information is enlightensthe audience and provides
them with amuch deeper understanding of the topic.
All items are covered in depth. The audience's interest was
raised and
they were engaged in discussion
(relevant questions asked).
Quality of Presentation 1 3 points 4 6 points 7 10 pointsQuality
of information
presented; Organization
and coherence of ideas;
Cohesiveness of the group.
Overall presentation.
The presentation slides contain errors. The talk flows poorly,
lacks clarity
and/or does not present ideas in a
coherent way.
Presenters not prepared. Overall quality of the presentation
is
poor.
The slides lack any obvious errors. The talk flows well, is
clear and
presents ideas in a coherent way.
Presenters are prepared. Overall quality of the presentation
is
good.
The slides are well designed throughoutthe presentation finish,
without errors.
The talk flows seamlessly, clearly andpresents research
information in a
coherent way.
Presenters are highly prepared and it isapparent that they have
practiced their
delivery.
Overall quality of the presentation isexcellent.
