Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2
Route 9 Corridor Improvement Project Stakeholder Meeting
April 24, 2017– MassDOT District 2
2 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Agenda
• Welcome & Introductions • Since We Last Met
• Transit Mobility Alternatives Report Findings • Transit Improvements Next Steps • Route 9 (Middle to South Maple) Project Update
• Transit Signal Priority Implementation
3 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Project Team
MassDOT’s Highway Division Responsible for Administering the Project Development Phase
Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Planning, Design & Engineering
Howard Stein Hudson Public Involvement
Toole Design Group Alternatives Analysis & Planning
4 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Agency Partners
5 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2
Since We Last Met
6 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Meetings and Ongoing Process
• Last Stakeholder Meeting – July 13, 2016
• Hadley Board of Selectmen – September 7, 2016
• Completed Transit Modeling
7 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2
Transit Mobility Alternatives Report Findings
8 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
B43 Transit Mobility Overview
NORTHAMPTON
HADLEY
AMHERST
9 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
B43 Transit Mobility Existing
10 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
B-43 Existing Travel Times
11 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
B-43 Delay Hotspots
12 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
B43 Transit Mobility Recommended Alternative
• Mixed-flow BRT system • Reroute along 116 / Terminate at
Haigis Mall • Transit Signal Priority system-wide • Stop consolidation • Move stops curbside at Malls and
UMass • Enhanced stops
13 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
B43 Transit Mobility Recommended Alternative
• Aerial of Proposed B43 Route – Consolidation of bus stops, suggested rerouting – Recommendations from UMass – Recommendations from PVTA
14 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Bus Route and Stop Consolidation
15 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Rapid Bus Design Assumptions
• Mixed-flow running ways • Low-floor articulated
buses • Branded buses and stops • Transit Signal Priority (TSP) • Attractive stops /
passenger amenities • Ticketing kiosks at major
stops • Frequent all-day service
16 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Transit Mobility Improvements at a Glance
• Transit Travel Time: 26% to 30% faster • Ridership Projections: 41.5% increase @ 15 min.
64.7% increase @ 10 min.
Feature Existing Rapid Bus
Route Miles 10.4 Miles 9 Miles
Number of Stops 54 Stops 30 Stops
Average Stop Spacing
0.3 Miles 0.5 Miles
17 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Travel Time Modeling Results
18 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Ridership Estimates
19 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Ridership Estimates
• Estimates based on TCRP Report 118 methodology – Determines ridership boost based on variety of BRT factors
(off-board fare collection, separate ROW, etc.) – Maximum BRT elasticity of 0.25 (if all elements achieved,
maximum ridership boost of 25%)
20 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Ridership Estimates
• Two scenarios considered: 1. One with 10 minute service or better, and off-
board fare collection 2. One without either
• Service frequency slightly more highly weighted in the model
21 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2
Transit Improvements Next Steps
22 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
I-91 Interchange 19
23 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Other MassDOT Projects
• Sidewalk & Wheelchair Ramp Construction on Route 9 – from South Maple Street / Route
116 to Amherst Town Line – Advertisement July 2017 – Construction: 1 year, start date
9/18/2017
• West Street Pedestrian Signals – 2 HAWK signals – District Office designing
No. 608023
No. 606547
24 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Streetscape and Station Design
25 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Streetscape and Station Design
26 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Streetscape and Station Design
27 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Streetscape and Station Design
28 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Branded Routes
29 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2
Route 9 (Middle to South Maple) Project Update
30 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Project Area
31 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Street Design Section
32 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Project Schedule 25% Design Submittal Summer 2017
Design Public Hearing Winter 2017/2018
Anticipated Advertisement 2020-2021
Draft State Transportation Improvements Program 2020
33 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
TSP Implementation for PVTA Blue Route 43 MassDOT Project # 608786
Initial Project Meeting
34 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
1 Improved schedule adherence TSP O B J E C T I V E S Improved transit
travel t ime eff ic iency 2
Minimize impacts to normal traff ic operations
3
35 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
What is Transit Signal Priority?
According to Transit Signal Priority: A Planning and Implementation Handbook TSP is an operational strategy that facilitates the movement of transit vehicles, either buses or streetcars, through traffic signal controlled intersections. Signal priority should not be confused with signal pre-emption, which while similar (and the terms are often used synonymous), they are in fact different processes. Source: Transit Signal Priority: A Planning and Implementation Handbook, May 2005, US DOT
36 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
TSP Functional Applications
Vehicle Detection
Priority Request Generator/Server
Priority Control Strategies
TSP System Management
1
2
3
4
37 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Vehicle Detection Systems
38 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Optical
- Most common technology - In use since late 1960’s - Three components:
1. Optical Emitter on buses 2. Optical Detector at signal 3. Phase selector in cabinet
39 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
GPS Technology
- Functionally similar to optical systems
- Can use location and speed data to apply TSP as bus approaches an intersection
- Line-of-sight not required - No additional infrastructure
(can be mounted in controller cabinet)
- GPS device required on vehicles, detection equipment at intersections
40 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
GPS vs. Optical Functionality
41 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
GPS vs. Optical – Comparable Costs
* Costs shown are Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
42 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Existing Equipment Intersection Town Jurisdiction Controller Model Software Version
Route 9 at John Green Ped Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT
Route 9 at Bedford Terrace Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT
Route 9 at Route 66 Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT
Route 9 at Route 10 Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT
Route 9 at Pleasant St Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT
Route 9 at Market and Hawley Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT
Route 9 at Day Ave (Ped) Northampton MassDOT TCT LMD 8000 0807170 Rev 8ERoute 9 at I-91 Ramps/Damon Rd Northampton MassDOT Econolite ASC/3-1000Route 9 at Bay Road Hadley MassDOT Econolite ASC 3-21--Route 9 at Route 47 Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.7.3 build 420Route 9 at East Street Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.7.3 build 420Route 9 at Lowes Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.6 Build 166Route 9 at Home Depot Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.6 Build 166Route 9 at Maple Street Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A Route 9 at CineMark Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.8 Build 412Route 9 at Route 116 - Hadley Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.3 Build 371Route 9 at Windfield Estates Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A Route 9 at University Drive Amherst MassDOT Peek 3000 8216A 3.6.8 Build 412University Dr at Big Y Amherst Amherst Naztec 980-A2300-1 v61.4gUniversity Dr at Amity St Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3108M34 3.32fUniversity Dr at Mass Ave Amherst UMASS Gammatronix Dial ControllerMassachusetts Avenue at Commonwealth Avenue Amherst UMASS Eagle EPAC M50 3.34gMassachusetts Avenue at North Pleasant St Amherst UMASS Eagle EPAC M50 3.34gTriangle St at East Pleasant St Amherst Amherst Naztec 980-A1300-1 v61.2sNorth Pleasaant Street at Kellogg St Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3608M41 3.32oPleasant Street at Amity Street and Main Street Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3608M41 3.32fRoute 9 at Route 116 - Amherst Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3608M41 3.33e
43 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Existing Equipment
44 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Existing Equipment Inventory performed as part of Route 9 Project
45 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2
Next Steps
Identify Design Committee • PVTA • MassDOT • Emergency Services
Develop Equipment Needs • Controllers • GPS • OPTICAL
Design & Construction
Maintenance Responsibility