81
THE RICHMOND LIBERTY TRAIL Heather Ashline Master of Urban & Regional Planning Program L. Douglas Wilder School of Government & Public Affairs Virginia Commonwealth University Spring 2015 Capital Improvements Plan

RLT Plan Draft

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RLT Plan Draft

THE RICHMOND LIBERTY TRAIL

Heather AshlineMaster of Urban & Regional Planning ProgramL. Douglas Wilder School of Government & Public Affairs Virginia Commonwealth UniversitySpring 2015

Capital Improvements Plan

Page 2: RLT Plan Draft

Introduction

Page 3: RLT Plan Draft

Liberty Trail CreationCreated in April, 2013Liberty Trail Committee

Greater Richmond Chamber City of Richmond Department of Economic & Community Development Richmond Region Tourism The Valentine Richmond History Center

Page 4: RLT Plan Draft

Existing FundingGreater Richmond ChamberPrivate Donations

Cash In-Kind

Volunteers Media

Page 5: RLT Plan Draft

The Clients

Page 6: RLT Plan Draft

PurposeRegional IdentityPermanent MarkersSupplementary

SignageMulti-Modal Trailheads

Page 7: RLT Plan Draft

Existing Conditions

Temporary Markers6.2 Miles (10k)50 Historic SitesNo Formal Parent

Organization

Page 8: RLT Plan Draft

Liberty Trail Route

Page 9: RLT Plan Draft

Richmond Downtown Plan“[Downtown improvements should]…celebrate and promote Richmond’s history with an aggressive historic preservation program and a coordinated system of history trails, museums and interpretive sites.”

-Richmond Downtown Plan, 2009-

Page 10: RLT Plan Draft

Richmond Downtown Plan

Page 11: RLT Plan Draft

Recent DevelopmentsRichmond Slave Trail

Addition of Permanent Markers and Informational Signage to the Richmond Slave Trail (2013)

Page 12: RLT Plan Draft

Recent DevelopmentsVirginia Capital Trail

Richmond Riverfront Portion of the Capital Trail to be completed by Fall 2015

Page 13: RLT Plan Draft

Recent DevelopmentsWorld Cycling Championships

Arrival of the UCI Road World Championships

Page 14: RLT Plan Draft

Heritage Tourism

“Traveling to experience the places, artifacts, and activities that authentically represent the stories and people of the past.”-National Trust for Historic Preservation-

Page 15: RLT Plan Draft

Heritage TourismBest Practices

Page 16: RLT Plan Draft

New Urbanism“…urban places should be framed by architecture and landscape design that celebrate local history, climate, ecology, and building practice.”-Charter of the New Urbanism, 2001-

Page 17: RLT Plan Draft

Walkable Urbanism

“While the physical and social rewards of walking are many, walkability is perhaps most useful as it contributes to urban vitality and most meaningful as an indicator of that vitality.”-Jeff Speck, 2012-

Page 18: RLT Plan Draft

WayfindingBest Practices

Page 19: RLT Plan Draft

The Boston Freedom Trail Master Plan

Page 20: RLT Plan Draft

Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia Master Plan

Page 21: RLT Plan Draft

Approach & Methods

Page 22: RLT Plan Draft

Plan OverviewProposed Improvement Locations

Supplementary Signage

Trailhead Kiosks

Permanent Trail Markers

Page 23: RLT Plan Draft

Market Analysis

Page 24: RLT Plan Draft

Virginia Tourism Industry $21 billion Industry

24 thousand jobs

City of Richmond 3rd most visited in Virginia

Heritage tourism ranked among top reasons to visit Virginia

Page 25: RLT Plan Draft

Median household income between $75,000 and $150,000

Majority report an average household size of 1 individual

Visitors most likely to stay for less than 1 week

Day trips are the second most common trip length

Visiting friends and sightseeing are the two most common reasons for visiting Virginia

Visitor Profile

Page 26: RLT Plan Draft

Study Area Overview

Page 27: RLT Plan Draft

53 % live in the City of Richmond

47 % live outside of the city

37 % live and/or work Downtown

Most likely to dine or engage in cultural activities while downtown

Public Outreach

Page 28: RLT Plan Draft

Attendance by District

Page 29: RLT Plan Draft

Preferred Method of TransportationWhile in Downtown Richmond

Walking Driving Bicycling Public Transportation0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Page 30: RLT Plan Draft

Drivers of activity

Page 31: RLT Plan Draft

“Establishments operating in sectors which are traditionally highly impacted by tourism activity.”-Fretchling & Horvath, 1999-

“…factor[s] which draw tourists away from their customary environment”-Lew, 1987-

ATTRACTIONS

KEY ESTABLISHMENTS

Page 32: RLT Plan Draft

The Library of Virginia

Virginia State Capitol

American Civil War Center

Museum of Confederacy

The Valentine

The Holocaust Museum

St. John's Church

Richmond Region Visitor Center

Maggie Walker House

Poe Museum

John Marshall House

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

2012 2013

Attendance by Attraction

Page 33: RLT Plan Draft

Comfortable Walking Distance Popular Attractions

Page 34: RLT Plan Draft

Top Tourism Industry Sectors

Arts & Entertainment• Performing Arts,

Spectator Sports & Related Industries

• Museums, Historical Sites & Similar Institutions

• Amusement, Gambling & Recreation

Food & Beverage• Full Service

Restaurants• Limited Service

Eating Places• Drinking Places• Food & Beverage

Stores

Retail• Sporting goods,

hobby, book & music stores

• General merchandise stores

• Miscellaneous store retailers

• Electronics & appliance stores

• Building material & garden equipment and supplies dealers

• Health & personal care stores

• Clothing & clothing accessories stores

Page 35: RLT Plan Draft

Location of Key EstablishmentsBy Industry SectorComfortable Walking DistanceKey Establishments

Page 36: RLT Plan Draft

Determining Primary Trail SectionsIntersection of Proximity to Key Establishments + Attractions

Implementation should be targeted: High-traffic areas Proximal to drivers of activity Near existing or planned multi-modal

infrastructure

Page 37: RLT Plan Draft

Walkability Assessment

Page 38: RLT Plan Draft

Strengths

Page 39: RLT Plan Draft

Weaknesses

Page 40: RLT Plan Draft

Proposed Designs

Page 41: RLT Plan Draft

Design Approach

Existing Conditions

Stakeholder

Engagement

Inspiration Case

Studies

Page 42: RLT Plan Draft

Established Signage

Page 43: RLT Plan Draft

Established Trail Markers

Page 44: RLT Plan Draft

Trailhead Kiosk Inspiration

Page 45: RLT Plan Draft

Trailhead Kiosk Design Inspiration

Alexandria, VA Lacrosse, WI

Page 46: RLT Plan Draft

Proposed Trailhead Kiosks Placed at strategic

locations in each district

District history & Sites

Wayfinding

Activity Promotion & Sponsor Information

Page 47: RLT Plan Draft

Trailhead KioskIn ContextLocation: Public parking beside The Carpenter Theater at CenterStage

Page 48: RLT Plan Draft

Permanent Trail Marker Preferences

Page 49: RLT Plan Draft

Permanent Trail Marker Design Inspiration

Page 50: RLT Plan Draft

Proposed Permanent Trail Markers Large: 24” diameter

Small: 12” diameter

District logos included in the designs

Space for sponsor information

Page 51: RLT Plan Draft

Trail MarkerIn ContextLocation: St. Paul’s Episcopal Church

Page 52: RLT Plan Draft

Supplementary Signage Inspiration

Page 53: RLT Plan Draft

Supplementary Signage Design Inspiration

Page 54: RLT Plan Draft

Proposed Supplementary Signage

Columnar Base

Vertical Layout

Additional Wayfinding

Activity Promotion

Supplementary signage should facilitate accessibility for populations with limited mobility

Page 55: RLT Plan Draft

Supplementary SignageIn ContextLocation: St. John’s Church at the intersection of East Broad Street and North 24th Street

Page 56: RLT Plan Draft

Goals & Vision

Page 57: RLT Plan Draft

Plan Vision“The inclusion of tangible enhancements along the Liberty Trail route will serve to solidify the trail’s regional identity as well as further connect Richmond’s historic assets. Aesthetic improvements along the trail route will be the first step in creating an asset for the City of Richmond which is appealing to visitors and local residents alike.”

Page 58: RLT Plan Draft

Goal 1: Implementation of aesthetic trail enhancements will be completed over the course of several phases.

Page 59: RLT Plan Draft

Identify appropriate phases of implementation.

OBJECTIVE 1.1:

City of Richmond Capital Improvement Program FY 2014-2019

Page 60: RLT Plan Draft

Determine accurate traffic levels by district

OBJECTIVE 1.2:

Popular “Friday Cheers” concert series hosted by Venture RichmondImage Source: Erin Barton, 365richmondva.wordpress.com

Page 61: RLT Plan Draft

Examine pricing optionsOBJECTIVE 1.3:

Location of public parking lots in Downtown RichmondImage Source: RideFinders

Page 62: RLT Plan Draft

Goal 2: The Liberty Trail Committee will garner support for trail enhancements from key stakeholders and potential investors.

Page 63: RLT Plan Draft

Determine the most effective methods for generating external funding

OBJECTIVE 2.1:

Virginia Capital Trail signage funding optionsImage Source: The Virginia Capital Trail Foundation

Page 64: RLT Plan Draft

Renew interest in the advantages of the Liberty Trail

OBJECTIVE 2.2:

The Valentine History Center offers guided tours along the trail route in conjunction with other community events

Page 65: RLT Plan Draft

Keep stakeholders and investors informed

OBJECTIVE 2.3:

Example of a formalized web presenceImage Source: The Boston Freedom Trail Foundation

Page 66: RLT Plan Draft

Goal 3: Ensure that the Liberty Trail is accessible to a variety of populations

Page 67: RLT Plan Draft

Enhance accessibility for populations with limited mobilityOBJECTIVE 3.1:

Image Source: U.S. DOT Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access Best Practices Guidelines

Page 68: RLT Plan Draft

Engage Youth OBJECTIVE 3.2:

School buses parked outside of Historic Tredegar

Page 69: RLT Plan Draft

Ensure that self-guided tours are user-friendly

OBJECTIVE 3.3:

Tourist Tracks provides specialized audio walking tours for cities throughout the United KingdomImage Source: http://www.tourist-tracks.com/tours/Canterbury.html

Page 70: RLT Plan Draft

Cost Estimations

Page 71: RLT Plan Draft

Estimated Cost

Base Cost per Unit

Simple Installation

Complex Installation

Total Cost per Unit (20% Contingency)Proposed Number of Units

Total Estimated Cost

$3,995

$1,000

$5,000

$5,994-$10,794

20

$119,880-$215,880

Trailhead Kiosks

Page 72: RLT Plan Draft

Estimated Cost

Base Cost per Unit

Simple Installation

Complex Installation

Total Cost per Unit (20% Contingency)Proposed Number of Units

Total Estimated Cost

$293

$1,000

$2,500

$1,552-$3,352

70$108,640-$234,640

Large Trail Markers

Page 73: RLT Plan Draft

Estimated Cost

Base Cost per Unit

Simple Installation

Complex Installation

Total Cost per Unit (20% Contingency)Proposed Number of Units

Total Estimated Cost

$200

$1,000

$2,500

$1,440-$3,240

461$663,840-1,493,640

Small Trail Markers

Page 74: RLT Plan Draft

Estimated Cost

Base Cost per Unit

Simple Installation

Complex Installation

Total Cost per Unit (20% Contingency)Proposed Number of Units

Total Estimated Cost

$531

$500

$2,000

$1,237-$3,037

191$236,267-$580,067

Supplementary Signage

Page 75: RLT Plan Draft

Total Cost EstimationItem Estimated Cost

Trailhead Kiosk

Large Trail Marker +

Small Trail Marker +

Supplementary Signage

+

Total

$119,880-$215,880$108,640-$234,640$663,840-1,493,640$236,267-$580,067

$1.2 m - $2.5 m

Page 76: RLT Plan Draft

Implementation Matrix

Page 77: RLT Plan Draft

Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Phase V

Focus Marketing24” Permanent Markers Installed at Each Stop

24” Permanent Markers Installed at Each Intersection

Installation of Trailhead Kiosks & Supplementary Signage

12” Permanent Trail Markers Installed Along the Remainder of the Trail Route

Implementation Time Frame

1-3 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 6-10 years

Phase Estimated

CostDependent upon marketing tactics

$77,600-$167,600 $31,040-$67,040 $356,147-

$795,947 $663,840-$1,493,640

Associated Objectives

• Identify appropriate phases of implementation

• Determine accurate traffic levels by district

• Examine pricing options

• Determine the most effective methods for generating external funding

• Renew interest in the advantages of the Liberty Trail

• Keep stakeholders and investors informed

• Enhance accessibility for populations with limited mobility

• Engage youth

• Ensure that self-guided tours are user-friendly

N/A N/A

Page 78: RLT Plan Draft

ConclusionProviding increased access to historic assets allows visitors and

residents alike to reflect upon their shared history. The City of Richmond is well known as a city founded on its history, and it is essential that this foundation be understood. Efforts such as the Richmond Liberty Trail are essential to realizing this greater goal.

The inclusion of amenities such as permanent trail markers and wayfinding signage along the Liberty Trail route is the first step

in engaging the community and solidifying the trail’s regional identity. It is critical that stakeholders in these initial improvements remain involved and enthusiastic so that the trail may be utilized for expanded purposes in the future.

Page 79: RLT Plan Draft

Thank you!

Page 80: RLT Plan Draft

Sources• AMW Dimensional Art (2006). Metals for Indoor and Outdoor Art. Retrieved from

http://www.dimensionsthruart.com/• California State Parks (2008). Materials and Processes for Outdoor Interpretive Signs.

Retrieved from http://www.parks.ca.gov/• Chmura Economics and Analytics (2014). Tourism Works for Virginia. Retrieved from

www.vatc.org. • EASI Analytic (2014). Amusement Index, 2014. Retrieved from www.simplymap.com• EASI Analytic (2014). Culture Index, 2014. Retrieved from www.simplymap.com• EASI Analytic (2014). Restaurant Index, 2014. Retrieved from www.simplymap.com• TNS Travels America. (2014). Central Virginia Region Travel Profile, 2013. Retrieved

from www.vatc.org.• TNS Travels America (2014). Travel Profile to Virginia, 2013. Retrieved from

www.vatc.org. • U.S. Travel Association. (August, 2014). The Economic Impact of Domestic Travel on

Virginia Counties, 2013. Retrieved from www.vatc.org.• University of Delaware Institute for Public Administration (August, 2010). Healthy

Communities: The Walkability Assessment Tool. Retrieved from http://www.ipa.udel.edu/

Page 81: RLT Plan Draft

Sources• Barnett, J. (2011). A Short Guide to 60 of the Newest Urbanisms. Planning, 77(4),

19-21.• Charter of the New Urbanism. (2001, January 1). Retrieved November 4, 2014, from

http://www.cnu.org/charter

• The Constitutional Foundation (2005). “The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia Master Plan”.

• Cultural Heritage Tourism. (2011, January 1). Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://www.culturalheritagetourism.org/

• Goody, Clancy (1995). “The Freedom Trail Study for a Renewal Vision.” Developed by Goody, Clancy and Associates for the Boston National Historic Park.

• Speck, J. (2012). Walkable city: how downtown can save America, one step at a time. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

• Urban Wayfinding Planning and Implementation Manual. (2013, January 1). Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://www.thesignagefoundation.org/Portals/0/UrbanWayfindingPlanningImplementationManualWebsite.pdf