Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Riverside Public Utilities
Succession Planning Recommendations
Spring 2011
RPU Fact Sheet
Obligation to Serve & Local Control
Annual budget - appx. half a billion dollars/yr
$400 to $500 million 5 year CIP
Total assets - $8 to $10 billion (FMV)
640 employees (9% vacant)
Vertically integrated Utilities
Provides and supports City services
National and state regulatory impacts growing
Facilities in multiple regions and states
Riverside is an area of growth
Regional economic driver
Succession Planning Goal
Our Mission Statement
Prepare for significant retirements in an era
where replacement candidates are scarce
Ensure that management transition over the
next decade is smooth for the customers, City
and employees
Build a workforce that represents our
community through proactive planning rather
than marketplace supply
Recommendation: Add 8 strategically placed
managers and reclassify several positions for
better leadership development
RPU - A Great Place to Work!
Result of years of effort!
Well Governed
Council, Board and Community Recognition
National Recognition
Leader In Clean Energy & Conservation
Water Independent
Highly Qualified, Professional Staff
Advancement Opportunities
State of the Art Facilities and Equipment
Healthy Budget, CIP and Growth Area
Succession Planning Concerns
Recession & hiring freeze in late 80s/early 90s
Appx. 1 out of 5 RPU employees is over 55
Appx. 1 out of 3 is over 50
Small candidate pool in mid-career range
Power Resources - 3 Power Resource Managers
positions filled by 9 people in less than 6 yrs.
Upper management recruitments yield few, if any,
qualified applicants
SCPPA members poaching from each other
California not attractive for relocation
Successful Efforts
Succession planning in many areas has been a
successful decade-long effort
Most “clerical” type jobs are adequately structured
and attract qualified candidates
Field positions are recruited at entry level, trained
through an RPU apprentice program, and
appropriately structured for succession planning
Most entry to mid-level professional positions
aren’t a recruiting challenge
Retention Challenges
Retention less challenging than recruitment
Limited areas with significant impacts
Utility specific salaries and benefits need to be comparable to other Utilities
Most salaries are set at competitive levels
Resignations of several excellent staff due to salary differentials have occurred
May need occasional promotional opportunities at times when positions are not available
Some resignations are normal and expected
A resignation should not create a major problem
Recruitment Challenges
Mid-level professional positions and above
Growing candidate shortage – RPU college majors not a high student priority, nor is locating to Riverside
Even a recessionary economy is not providing enough qualified candidates
All Utilities hiring from a shrinking candidate pool
Professional staff sought for RPU must often relocate
Specifically Principal Engineers in Water and Energy Delivery
Senior Engineer openings can experience candidate shortages
Experienced Resources positions and Scheduler/Traders
Water and Electric Superintendents
Finance/Accounting staff with specific training in Utilities
Marketing/Communications staff with training in Utilities
Overall Plan
Short term: Identify and recruit critical staff for
succession planning needs
Many positions don’t have a qualified internal candidate pool
Effort requires several positions and reclassifications
Double fill some positions where retirements are imminent
Expanded economic development efforts benefit RPU
Long Term: Encourage individuals with upward
potential for a long-term career at RPU
Competitively identify “high potential” candidates for promotion
Add programs and training to facilitate their advancement
Create a candidate pool of mid-level staff for promotion
Counsel individuals without development potential
Five Current RPU Divisions
Utilities
General
Manager
DGM
Electric
Delivery
AGM
Water
AGM
Resources
AGM
CFO -
Administration
AGM
Marketing
Cust. Rel.
Secretary
Reclassification New Position Existing Position
Water Division
Develop candidates for AGM – Water
Need increased subordinate development
• Esp. managerial and administrative area
Development of broad Utility perspective
Provide time for development of strategic initiatives
Principal Engineers
Very flat organizational structure - 5 to 15 direct reports
Significant time spent on detailed project level issues
Superintendents (Field Management)
Only management level in field organization
Manage 30 – 70 people, selected from crew supervisors
Limited theory and supervisory experience
Need management development time and support
Water Org Chart
AGM
Water
Principal
Engineer
Principal
Engineer
Principal
Engineer
Principal
Engineer
Principal
Engineer
Principal
Engineer
Water
Operations
Manager
Water
Super-
intendent
Water
Super-
intendent
Water Division
Reclassify 2 Engineering Managers from
existing Principal Engineer positions
Engineering Manager positions part of historic
structure
Remaining Principal Engineers report to new
Engineering Manager positions
Add 2 Water Operations Managers
Add 1 Superintendent
Water Recommended Org Chart
AGM
Water
Engineering
Manager
(Delivery)
2
Principal
Engineers
Engineering
Manager
(Resources)
2
Principal
Engineers
Water
Operations
Manager
Water
Superintendent
Water
Operations
Manager
Water
Superintendent
Water
Operations
Manager
Water
Superintendent
Principal
Resource
Analyst-
Regulation
Energy Delivery
Eminent Retirement of AGM
Existing structure does not develop a candidate pool
Two external recruitments to develop candidates in 3 years
One hired away by a SCPPA member, RPU hired from a
SCPPA member
Recruitments Taking 6 -12 Months - Longer
Engineering Managers, Principal Engineers and Senior
Engineers all suffering the same challenge
Recruitments not delivering candidates
Need to reinstate Principal Electrical Engineer designation
Recommendation
Add one Engineering Manager
Add two Electric Superintendents
Energy Delivery Org Chart
AGM
Energy
Delivery
Engineering
Manager
4
Principal
Engineers
Electric
Operations
Manager
Superintendent
IBEW
Supervisors
Electric
Field
Manager
2
Superintendents
Outside
Constr. Mgr.
IBEW
Supervisors
Safety
Manager
Project
Assistant
Energy Delivery
Recommended Org Chart
AGM
Energy
Delivery
Engineering
Manager
2
Principal E.
Engineers
Engineering
Manager
2
Principal E.
Engineers
Electric
Field/Operations
Manager
3
Superintendents
Electric
Field/Operations
Manager
2
Superintendents
Outside
Constr. Mgr
Safety
Manager
Project
Assistant
Resources
Annual power budget: ~ $170 million
RPU is only muni:
Participating Transmission Owner
Located within CAISO
Scheduling Coordinator
Performs all wholesale power supply functions with own staff
In CA, only Anaheim and Pasadena similar
Some utilities outsource at a higher cost
RPU provides its own services and for several other utilities
Larger munis (IID, SMUD, LADWP) aren’t in the ISO
Can’t recruit from them as no ISO training
They look to RPU for candidates
Resources (cont)
No direct degree programs - OJT and experience
Source degrees of Business, Math, Engineering
Aptitude for industry, theory and application
Not all hired develop
Experienced individuals sought after by others
Upper level Manager - national recruiter, salary increased by 25%, still only 2 qualified candidates over 12 mos
Must develop own Resources employees as we can’t find experienced outside candidates
Succession planning mostly resolved in this division
Resources Org Chart - First Tier
AGM
Resources
Real
Property Agent
Generation
Manager
Power
Resources
Manager
(Scheduling)
Power
Resources
Manager
(Contracts/Proj.)
Power
Resources
Manager
(Marketing)
Resources - Recommendations
No new positions, possible reclassifications
Consideration of reclassifying Settlements series into Resource Analyst series
Requires HR job description and duties review
Create a lower entry level compensation range to develop candidates
Minimum standards for recruitment still requires a good long term “fit”
Add entry level staff if RPU’s are recruited away
Finance
FASB/GASB provided in college courses
No FERC/MW/MMbtu accounting
• No energy risk or regulatory compliance management
• No utility ratemaking
Multiple years and areas of focus to develop analytical ability
Accountant doesn’t equal a capable Analyst
CPA type experience highly desirable
Current structure not developing candidate pool
Principal Analyst and Manager Level Recruitment Challenges
Small pool
Promotional opportunities at other utilities
Often just technical proficiency OR managerial development
Need cross training
Finance Org Chart
AGM
Finance
(CFO)
Assistant
CFO
Utilities Principal
Analyst (0.5)
Utilities Senior
Analyst
2 Senior
Accountants
Finance/
Rates
Manager
Utilities Pricing
Analyst
Senior
Accountant
Business
Systems
Support
Manager
IT
Liason
Utility
Billing
Supervisor
Regulatory/
Energy
Risk Manager
Utilities Principal
Analyst (0.5)
Finance Recommendations
Create Utilities Fiscal Manager position
Add one position
Consider reclassifying 5 existing positions
Need HR assistance
One Utilities Fiscal Manager
Reclassify Pricing Analyst to Utilities Analyst
Series
Promote after training, if appropriate
• 3 Sr. Accountants to Utilities Sr. Analysts
Finance Org Chart - Recommended
AGM
Finance
(CFO)
Assistant
Utilities CFO/
Util. Fisc. Mgr.
(Finance/Budget)
Utilities Principal Analyst
Utilities Senior
Analyst
Utilities
Fiscal
Manager
(Rates/Revenues)
Utilities Principal Analyst
Utilities Senior
Analyst
Utilities
Fiscal
Manager
(Cap./Spec. Projects)
Utilities Principal Analyst (0.5)
Utilities Senior
Analyst
Regulatory/
Risk Manager
Utilities Principal
Analyst (0.5)
IT
Liason
Business
Systems
Support
Manager
Marketing Customer Relations
Fast growing discipline for municipal utilities
Growing regulation at state and national levels
Conservation & rebates a significant effort 22,000 rebates in 2009/10
Increased customer expectations and contacts
Outsourced communications poor and high cost
Few candidates with regulated industry experience
Need management training in all functional areas
Increase understanding of experience
requirements
“Green” responsibilities an additional skill set
Marketing Org Chart – First Tier
AGM
Marketing &
Customer
Relations
Public Benefit /
Bus. Relations
Manager
Marketing
Manager
Sustainability
Officer
Customer
Service
Manager
Field
Service
Manager
Recommendations Mktg.
Consider reclassification of 3 existing positions to
Public Benefits/Customer Relations Manager
HR assistance required
One Principal Account Manager position in each
section
Reclassify two from existing a/c manager positions
• HR assistance required
Recommended Org Chart – Long Term
AGM
Marketing &
Customer
Relations
Pub. Ben./
Customer Rel.
Manager
(Rebates and
Account Reps.)
Principal
Account Rep.
Pub. Ben./
Customer Rel.
Manager
(Marketing /
Communications)
Principal
Account Rep.
Pub. Ben./
Customer Rel.
Manager
(Customer
Service)
Principal
Account Rep.
Field Services
Manager
Sustainability
Officer
Study Area - Compensation
Entry to mid-level management compensation
levels remain at average
Mid-level and above should allow for above
average for excellent performance
Use private sector model
Utilize merit pay
Merit pay only to be utilized for individuals with
significant performance effort or promotional potential
Employees with average performance or without
promotional potential compensated at average levels
New evaluation criteria may be required
At most:
Water – Add 3 positions, 2 reclassifications
Electric Delivery – Add 3 positions
Resources – 3 reclassifications
Finance – Add 1 position, 5 reclassifications
Marketing/Customer Service – Add 1
position, 5 reclassifications
8 new positions
15 reclassifications
Position Summary
Impacts
New and Reclassifications from existing
positions
Incorporate into annual budget
Possibly implement over several years
No impact on rates
Riverside Public Utilities –
Prepared for the Future