Upload
bathsheba-merritt
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
rgu
Teachers’ real-world information literacy:
a study of school teachers’ use of research information in support of their own reflective
evidence-informed practice
Funded by the Economic and Social Science Research Council, 2002-2003
Dorothy Williams & Louisa Coles
rgu
Background: aims, context, questions
Methods used Findings Conclusions/Implications for
librarians
rgu
Aim To examine teachers’ current
practice, attitudes and skills in relation to the effective use of research information in their professional practice.
Research information: the published output of a planned piece of research – i.e.
information relating to “external” (other people’s) research
rgu
Dual context
Information literacy
Evidence-informed practice/ research-based teaching
rgu
Information literacy Research has focussed largely on
students (school and HE), pedagogies and the role of libraries
information seeking behaviour in professional groups; conceptions of information literacy amongst academics
We know relatively little about teachers’ own confidence, abilities and strategies as information finders and users
Previous research in UK in 90s (Best, 1990; Wilson, 1997) suggested teachers were not confident information users – is this an ongoing issue?
rgu
Use of research information is part of reflective, evidence-informed practice
Stenhouse: the research-based teacher is not only an action-researcher but also someone who tests out the application of other people’s research findings in their own classroom
Cordingley (1999): “need to see the activity of interpreting evidence developed by others as a high status activity which is central to reflective practice”
Various UK information initiatives (by teacher professional bodies and government) are actively promoting better online access to research reports, digests and systematic reviews – EPPI-centre; GTC Research of the Month website; DfES Research Informed Practice Site
Lack of teacher take-up of research findings has been the subject of much previous research, but not from information literacy perspective
rgu
Qs: in the context of evidence-informed teaching How confident do teachers feel about
finding and using information (general and research-specific) in their own professional learning?
What strategies do they employ and how does this compare with traditional definitions of information literacy?
What are teachers’ attitudes towards finding and using “external” research information?
rgu
Mixed methodology Surveys : 3000 teachers, 500 head-teachers, 250 school
librarians, 49 Schools Library Services (SLS), 100 Education Authority (EA) Advisers in Scotland, England, and Wales – low teacher response
In-depth scenario interviews with 28 teachers, probing research information strategies used in relation to a) development of subject area; b) development of teaching strategies
4 group exercises, with 2-6 teachers, probing teachers’ approaches to evaluation of quality of research information
Online discussion forum: reflection/refinement of key findings
rgu
Barriers to use of researchFive of top 6 barriers (out of 35) were
information related:
Lack of time to find and read Lack of information about what is available Relevant information is not compiled in one
place Lack of easy access The amount of research is overwhelming Lack of research information in the school
library
rgu
Information literacy
Teachers report relatively high levels of confidence in information literacy
They were more confident in finding general subject information than searching for research or professional opinion
rgu
Confidence in finding information
47.8 46.2 47.855.4 49.7 43.9 40.4
42.3 41
1617.3
1617.3
15.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
generalbackgroundreading on
subject area
subject-basedinformation inpreparationfor teaching
recentresearch in asubject area
research:teaching
methods andstyles
professionalopinion:teaching
methods andstyles
research:learning theory
professionalopinion:
learning theory
Information Type
perc
enta
ge o
f tea
cher
s in
dica
ting
'con
fiden
t' or
'v
ery
conf
iden
t'
very confident
confident
rgu
Confidence in information literacy
91.9 88.985
81.1 79.3
67.160.9 59 56.3 57.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
identifying &defining info need
locating info evaluating &selecting
organising &synthesising
communicating &presenting
aspects of information literacy
perc
enta
ge
of
teac
hers
indi
catin
g 'c
onfid
ent'
or 'v
ery
conf
iden
t'
General information
Research Information
rgu
Relationship between information literacy and other factors
Attitude/Involvement in Research: those who have been involved in research are more likely to be confident in research IL (p < 0.001).
Sector: Nursery and primary teachers less likely to be highly confident in general IL or research IL than those in the secondary sector (p < 0.01).
Subject: Maths teachers less confident than others in research IL (p < 0.05); teachers of social and environmental subjects more confident than others (p < 0.01) about their general IL (not echoed in relation to research IL).
rgu
Sources used
Teachers confidence in research information literacy is based on use of a limited range of research sources (similar to range of general information sources teachers cited in relation to professional development in 1997 study)
Reliance on informal sources; readily accessible sources; not necessarily the most reliable sources for research evidence
Libraries in bottom half of sources used.
rgu
Source used for subject related research
% regularly using source
Source used for research related to teaching & learning theories & practice
% regularly using source
1 Colleagues: Informal discussions 46.5 Colleagues: Informal discussions 34.3
2Professional magazines or newspapers
41.3Professional magazines or newspapers
34.3
3 In-service events 37.2 In-service events 30.1
4 EA Information 34 EA Information 28.5
5 Mainstream Newspapers 29.5Colleagues: school-based development meetings
25
6Colleagues: school-based development meetings
28.5 Mainstream Newspapers 17.9
7 The Internet 27.6 The Internet 13.5
8Colleagues: EA-wide development meetings
15.7 Head teacher 13.1
9Colleagues: local subject networks
15.4Colleagues: EA-wide development meetings
11.9
10 Head teacher 13.8 Research journals 11.2
rgu
Information literacy categories
Information confident/active – have developed/are aware of successful information strategies; encouraged to find/use research information by school/HT ethos
Information aware/passive – do not follow the course of action they would recommend to others; knowingly accept compromise; expect others to do it for them - expectation that head teachers and Education Authorities should take responsibility; discouraged by school ethos
Lack information skills/knowledge – experience problems in finding, evaluating and/or synthesising information
rgu
Aware/passive “I don’t really discriminate, anything that’s available, it’s
quite a narrow range of material….and sometimes it’s out of date as well….” (s Principal Subject Teacher)
“You talk to people in your own school......but you get a very limited view….the danger is there that the person you’ve asked has asked someone else in the same school and it gets very in-bred…” (s Teacher)
“…when you actually looked at the size of the sample studied it was really not valid, so small. And so I do check that out, but I don’t really get into it. I like a bit of a life.” (p Head Teacher)
“Somebody else can sift through the data, we need the conclusions” (s Principal Subject Teacher)
“I think people like to be spoon fed. If it’s there, they’ll look at it and they’re interested in it. But they wouldn’t go looking for it. That’s a huge leap…” (p Head Teacher)
“I would expect that the management would be able to provide me with any background information or ways of accessing that information” (p Teacher)
“If it’s in school and if it lands on your lap then fine, I’ll read it, but I couldn’t put a lot of effort into it”
rgu
Lack information skills/knowledge
“sometimes I feel it’s just a needle in a haystack kind of thing….” (n Teacher)
Internet – “just hit or miss” “just potter about” (p Teacher) ; ”sort of clicking fairly aimlessly about on the web”(p Head Teacher)
“I’d be really hard pressed to tell the difference between a good piece of research and a not so good piece…” (p Head Teacher)
“I found it really hard…because it was like so abstract, and you had to do a lot of work to make it relevant to practice and experience” (p Head Teacher)
“it wasn’t specific enough for me as to how to adapt it to your practice” (s Teacher)
Concerns about information overload
rgu
Conclusions Relatively closed world – information is
gleaned from colleagues and people who are known and trusted
Lack of time and lack of ready access in one place are seen as major barriers: Internet/web is breaking through some of the barriers but some are not confident in their ability to search/evaluate
Teachers are not pro-active information seekers in relation to changing professional practice
rgu
Conclusions Relatively confident about finding and using
general information but less confident about research info
Less confident in synthesising, organising and communicating information – yet this is fundamental to professional learning, to “the knowledge creating school” (Hargreaves, 1999)
Real-world information literacy is based on a pragmatic acceptance of what’s provided, even if known to be limited in scope or quality, rather than a desire to search out, evaluate, synthesise the most valid/highest quality info
rgu
Implications? Information literacy in teacher education (initial and in-
service):
need for greater focus on finding and using information in professional learning (not just as classroom activity or academic/HE);
more focus on effective use of sources likely to be accessible in professional life – e.g. internet/web and people
For school librarians:
scope to solve some of the time/accessibility problems which discourage professional information seeking/use by teachers (proactive approach, use of intranet, collaboration between librarians and education authorities, some reprioritisation)
information literacy in schools – more emphasis on information and learning, less on library
Implications for information literacy development in pupils?
rgu
Further information
Project website:http://www.rgu.ac.uk/abs/research/page.cfm?pge=8785
Contains a link to the project report on the ESRC’s REGARD database
Contact: [email protected]