13
Reviewing the Technical Literature Brian Paul

Reviewing the Technical Literature

  • Upload
    chuong

  • View
    40

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Reviewing the Technical Literature. Brian Paul. Gathering Evidence. Keyword searches Google Scholar ISI Web of Knowledge Be sure to evaluate whether the keword database covers the key journals in your field Keyword searching is iterative Kewords become more refined over time Closure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Reviewing the Technical Literature

Brian Paul

Page 2: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Gathering Evidence• Keyword searches

– Google Scholar– ISI Web of Knowledge

• Be sure to evaluate whether the keword database covers the key journals in your field

• Keyword searching is iterative– Kewords become more refined over time

• Closure– Use citations to find new related papers– When no new papers are found, you have closure

Page 3: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Key Features of a Synthesis

• It accurately reports information from the sources using different phrases and sentences;

• It is organized in such a way that readers can immediately see where the information from the sources overlap;

• It makes sense of the sources and helps the reader understand them in greater depth.

Page 4: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Different types of syntheses

• Background and Relevance– Purpose is to establish context and relevance – What is a relevant research question/problem?

• Thesis-driven– Purpose is to establish uniqueness– What is a novel thesis (answer/solution)?

• Where are the technical gaps in other theses?• How does the evidence support or deny your thesis?

Page 5: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Background

• Purpose: to help reader understand context of research

• EX: Diffusion bonding of microreactors– What are microreactors?

• Microchannels accelerated heat & mass transfer• Increase cross-section of flow by using arrays

– Why are microreactors important?• Less time required in the channel short channel lengths

miniaturization distributed and portable processing• Faster heating and mixing better process control more

precise chemical processing

Page 6: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Relevance• Purpose: to establish a relevant question/problem• EX: Diffusion bonding of microreactors

– Channel warpage is caused during the diffusion bonding of microchannel heat exchangers (MCHX)

– Channel warpage can lead to flow maldistribution within the MCHX

– Flow maldistribution reduces the effectiveness of MCHX requiring more surface area

– More surface area requires the device to be larger– THEREFORE: Channel warpage must be minimized to enable

miniaturization• OUTCOME: What causes channel warpage during diffusion

bonding?

Page 7: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Research Questions

• Questions are typically iterative– Why do we miniaturize? (distributed processing)

– How do we miniaturize? (chem etch and diff bonding)– What causes channel warpage during diffusion bonding?

(nonuniform stress distribution)– What caused channel warpage in a particular diffusion

bonding cycle?

A B

(thermal warpage?)

Page 8: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Thesis-driven• Purpose

– Show readers that you are familiar with the field and are thus qualified to offer your own opinions

– Where are the technical gaps?• Must start with a question

– How can we create flow field uniformity within microchannels?

– What causes channel warpage during diffusion bonding?

– What caused channel warpage in a particular diffusion bonding cycle?

Page 9: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Read and Evaluate Each Paper• What does this paper say about my focus?

– Gaucho et al.1 found that header cross-sections must be 10X channel cross-sections in order to ensure the uniform distribution of flow.

• What is the thesis, purpose or context of the source? What are the limitations of the paper?

– In evaluating the distribution of cooling fluids within rocket engines, Gaucho et al. …• Is the source credible?

– All claims were based on CFD simulations. No empirical evidence was provided to validate findings.

OR– Trial and error methods were used to establish this principle.OR– A full factorial design of experiments was developed based on header diameter and channel

diameter.• What questions remain (relevance)? What approaches have not been taken (thesis)?• What did you learn from this paper that is important for the reader to know?

Page 10: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Organizing the Body of Your Synthesis

• This is the value add– Group the literature together around common themes

based on your evaluations (see prior slide)– Requires some thought i.e. this could take a while

• How can you bring structure to the literature that has been published?– Chronology– Classification – what are the patterns you see

• Diffusion brazing– Conventional brazing compounds– Electroplated phosphates– Nanopowders

– …

Page 11: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Each Synthesis Paragraph …1. Begins with a topic sentence.2. Includes information from more than one source.3. Clearly indicates which material comes from which source

using lead in phrases and in-text citations. – Beware of accidental plagiarism which most often occurs when

students are synthesizing sources and do not indicate where the synthesis ends and their own comments begin or vice verse.

4. Shows the similarities or differences between the different sources in ways that make the paper as informative as possible. Should include paper summaries and evaluations.

5. Represents the texts fairly--even if that seems to weaken the paper! You are simply repeating what the source says …

– in fewer words– in your own words

Page 12: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Synthesis Summary• Remind readers of the most significant themes you have

found.– Key concept in creating uniform flow fields is to produce the

same pressure drop through all pathways in the device.• Offer an interpretation of the material and/or take a

position. – No uniform flow field micromixers currently exist in the

literature.• You may also want to suggest further research or comment

on things that it was not possible for you to discuss in the paper. – This paper will discuss the design, fabrication and testing of a

uniform flow field micromixer to be used for the production of nanoparticles.

Page 13: Reviewing the Technical Literature

Assignment #3• Due Monday, April 27

– Synthesis paper – 4 to 6 double space pages– 5-7 minute presentation – alphabetical order

• See synthesis paper details in syllabus– Perform keyword searches – at least 20 papers– Evaluate each paper

• Short summary of what it is about (sentence or two)• What did you learn that the reader should know i.e. that shapes your research question or

thesis?– Write synthesis

• Expected outline (write like it is the front of a manuscript)

– Upfront paragraph(s) provide the context for the lit review– Organize literature into paragraphs (see organization slide)– Summary

• If background Why is your topic important?• If relevance What is a relevant research question?• If thesis-drive What are the technical gaps? What is your thesis?