Upload
griffin-wiggins
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
The Literature Review ?
“Literature reviews …… introduce a topic, summarise the main issues and provide some illustrative examples.”
Agree? Disagree?
If they are to be considered a reliable source
of research evidence, literature reviews should record provide the reader with sufficient to be able to judge whether all of the relevant literature is likely to have been found, and how the quality of research considered was assessed.
1 Agree? 5 Disagree? 10
The Literature Review ?
Discussion
What is a Literature Review? Why do we do Literature Reviews? What are the main challenges?
Literature Matters
connection to findings
coverage
working understanding
critical appraisal
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., & Lovat, T. (2007). Examiner comment on the literature review in Ph.D. theses. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 337–356. doi:10.1080/03075070701346899
“importance of coherent argument”
“more than acknowledge the literature and pull it together… includes ‘working understanding’ ‘critical appraisal’ ‘ connection to findings’ and disciplinary perspective’”
Literature Matters
disciplinary perspective
scholarliness
Knowledge of range of literature
DEMONSTRATES
Systematic Review Means you need to be:
Critical Evaluate what you read
Analyse Extract differing information from what you read
Synthesise Show relationships between studies/sources; differing
definitions, concepts, theories etc. Evaluate
Methodological approaches/tools and techniques used
Systematic Review – Objective is to produce more than a summary A review of a clearly formulated question That uses systematic and explicit methods To identify, select and critically appraise
relevant research, And to collect, analyse, synthesise and
evaluate the research that is included within the review.
Systematic Review Need to apply the same level of rigour to
reviewing research evidence as you will apply to producing your research evidence
Workflow for Literature Reviews
Search Assess Read Write
How do I start?
Start with an area you are interested in or need to find out about.
Look for hot topics, trends, emerging ideas, key questions, key issues.
Example Suppose I have searched for a topic I’m
interested in: Education Higher Level Computer Science Teaching and Learning Approaches For some purpose
What are key issues of interest ? To Ireland, Third Level in Ireland, DIT in particular
Peer Tutoring In Computer Science Programmes In Tertiary Education and its Effects On First Year Student Retention.
Clear context, clear statement of scopeClear context, clear statement of scope
Locating and Finding Research
Where do I start?
Need to decide what I need to tell the reader about.
Breaking my topic into pieces
So what do I want to find out?Student
retention
In CS @ 3rd level
Peer Tutoring
Effects on
students
Combine the results to make a case
Locating and Finding Research
Student retention
•What do I mean by this,
why is it a problem, why
are people interested in
it
•Why do students drop
out
For third level computer
science
•Why are people
interested, what is the
level of problem in the
area
•Why do student drop out
Locating and Finding Research
Peer Tutoring
•What is it
•How can it help students – all ways
•How can it help student retention in particular
Where do I start?
Previous Theses Review Papers Journal Papers Conference Papers Supervisor
Phase 1- Identify the Research
A broad but defined, systematic sweep Defined search terms
record recall and precision Recall is the ratio of the number of
relevant records retrieved to the total number of relevant records in the database. It is usually expressed as a percentage.
Precision is the ratio of the number of relevant records retrieved to the total number of irrelevant and relevant records retrieved. It is usually expressed as a percentage.
Defined search arena e.g. databases, citation indices, reference
lists from primary and review articles, grey literature, conference proceedings, research registers, the internet, individual researchers/practitioners
Other broad search limits, e.g. language, date,
TIPS! Document the
search protocol and record what
research was found
Systematically manage the
search output, e.g. using zotero,
endnote
Phase 2- Selection
Select from research using criteria related to your research question
Develop inclusion or exclusion statements, these might relate to purpose of the paper, study outcomes, research design, methods used, population worked with etc.
E.G. Review paper E.G. Paper by key author E.G. Year long studies E.G. Pure computer science
programmes only
TIPS! Document the
statements and
their purpose (might be
pragmatic or research related)
Search Log
Date Database Keywords Results
1/11/13 2pm ACM Digital Library Peer, tutoring, undergraduate
10 articles
4/11/13 SpringerLink Peer tutor*, “computer science”
5 articles
1 book
10/11/13 Scopus Student retention, undergraduate
0
Running the search How many titles and abstract can you check? How easy will it be to decide to accept or reject a
record? Record the reason for rejection for “Excluded
research”
Don’t stop searching when you’ve stopped searching
3. Critical appraisal of studies
“Assessing the quality of methodology is a critical part of the systematic review process”
No standard approach but there are hierarchies in fields of study
Critical appraisal of research
What would be appropriate to consider when critically
appraising research in your area?
25
4. Collect data & analyse
Evaluate Synthesise results of literature review
Tables to compare Descriptive
Author Year Aim Methods Conclusions Critique
Write up literature review - Structure Background Purpose/Research question Method Findings Discussion Implications/Recommendations
Voice – Guide the Reader Through
1. Assess the value of the literature
2. Explain the context research takes place
3. Emphasise limitations of existing research
4. Tell a story
Writing StyleIntroduction
What I will show you?Why?
BodyWhy this area?Don’t leave reader to fill gaps
ConclusionWhat we have seen?How this is relevant to research?
Evaluation and Literature Review Towards the end of your dissertation you will
refer back to literature review Do your findings confirm those of others? Does your work extend that of others? Does your work provide new meaning to the work
of others? Does your work break new ground? Does your work raise issues about the
methodological choices made in previous studies? Does your work challenge existing ideas on your
subject?
Comprehensive Literature Review
Coherent synthesis of past and present
research in the domain of study
Source: Dr Hazel Hall, Napier University
What are the main conclusions on
previous research in this area?
What are the key areas of debate in this
area?
Which aspects of this work are of most relevance to my
study?
What are the key concepts in this area?
What have been the main research
questions?
Where is existing knowledge “thin”?
How is this topic approached by
others?Where are the gaps in
literature?
What are the main
perspectives on this topic in
previous research?
Do parallel literatures exist for this topic?
Which discussions?
Which sub-themes? Which writers?
Which work is subject to
challenge?
Who are these
“others”?
Which existing work could be
extended?
In which subject areas has the topic
been studied?
Challenges in Conducting Literature Reviews Where Knowing where to start, (e.g. wide
then narrow, or narrow then wide?) and what to include
Knowing when to stop literature searching Knowing when to stop “perfecting” the
review Knowing how far to venture into the
literature of associated domains Your supervisor will help you through these