4
Response to Donnie Reagan Copyright 2013, www.seekyethetruth.com 1 Video available here: http://youtu.be/wXYLuRhkBqI In a sermon entitled “Without Understanding,” preached March 6, 2013, cult pastor Donnie Reagan preached an entire half of a sermon on “confusion.” I say confusion, not that this is the title of the section, but because that is exactly what he tried to do to his congregation. I could have used the phrase “grasping at straws,” because he seems to be trying to confuse the people to keep them in the sinking ship just a few hours longer. While one pastor in Ohio contacted us with the grace and love that Christ displayed, Reagan is an example of a cult pastor now hiding in shadows. While one asked us by name to hear their testimony of why they still follow Branham, Reagan referred to those who are now standing for the Bible with sounds of “crying sissy children” while he screamed at his spellbound congregation like a rabid dog. Not even aware that many in his own congregation are now seeing through this confusion for what it really is: deception. Because most of his congregation are now aware that William Branham copied “divine revelations” from the works of other men and said that “angels met him in the room” to deliver these “revelations,” Reagan would rather try to prove a negative, which he knows is more difficult than focusing on the real issue. The problem? To keep people bound in a cult, he is willing to forfeit his soul by preaching on fault with the Word of God. And this is the same congregation that he preached sermons about the “Rhema” to – how only the “prophet” was able to interpret the Word of God! “Let’s confuse them on scripture, because I’ve already taught them not to open it!” I have three children, very good boys who love Jesus with all their heart. One of them has just learned the “invention of lying,” and we have to correct him now and again. It is a stage of growing, one that some men never get out of. Thankfully, my children have their hearts focused on Jesus Christ. If one of them were to throw a baseball through a window, and tell me that he watched as a neighbor kid threw it, I’d probably know it was a little fib before going any further. But if another one of my boys were to look at me and to tell me: “Daddy, he lied to you, but that’s ok because the Bible has conflict,” I would end up spanking both of them! Magnify that. If the son protecting the one who told the fib were getting paid several thousand dollars every Sunday to keep telling the fib over and over, I’d probably blow my stack! Both boys need a good, oldfashioned woodshed experience! Reagan went through the scriptures, nitpicking the Word of God like it was some twobit National Enquirer magazine. Because the Word says in some places that the Voice Paul heard said, “I am Jesus,” and in another place the writer wrote, “I am Jesus of Nazareth,” Reagan cries foul.

Response to Donnie Reagan

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

In a sermon entitled “Without Understanding,” preached March 6, 2013, cult pastor Donnie Reagan preached an entire half of a sermon on “confusion.” I say confusion, not that this is the title of the section, but because that is exactly what he tried to do to his congregation. I could have used the phrase “grasping at straws,” because he seems to be trying to confuse the people to keep them in the sinking ship just a few hours longer.While one pastor in Ohio contacted us with the grace and love that Christ displayed, Reagan is an example of a cult pastor now hiding in shadows. While one asked us by name to hear their testimony of why they still follow Branham, Reagan referred to those who are now standing for the Bible with sounds of “crying sissy children” while he screamed at his spellbound congregation like a rabid dog. Not even aware that many in his own congregation are now seeing through this confusion for what it really is: deception.Because most of his congregation are now aware that William Branham copied “divine revelations” from the works of other men and said that “angels met him in the room” to deliver these “revelations,” Reagan would rather try to prove a negative, which he knows is more difficult than focusing on the real issue.

Citation preview

Page 1: Response to Donnie Reagan

Response  to  Donnie  Reagan  

Copyright  2013,  www.seekyethetruth.com    1  

Video  available  here:  http://youtu.be/wXYLuRhkBqI    In  a  sermon  entitled  “Without  Understanding,”  preached  March  6,  2013,  cult  pastor  Donnie  Reagan  preached  an  entire  half  of  a  sermon  on  “confusion.”        I  say  confusion,  not  that  this  is  the  title  of  the  section,  but  because  that  is  exactly  what  he  tried  to  do  to  his  congregation.    I  could  have  used  the  phrase  “grasping  at  straws,”  because  he  seems  to  be  trying  to  confuse  the  people  to  keep  them  in  the  sinking  ship  just  a  few  hours  longer.    While  one  pastor  in  Ohio  contacted  us  with  the  grace  and  love  that  Christ  displayed,  Reagan  is  an  example  of  a  cult  pastor  now  hiding  in  shadows.    While  one  asked  us  by  name  to  hear  their  testimony  of  why  they  still  follow  Branham,  Reagan  referred  to  those  who  are  now  standing  for  the  Bible  with  sounds  of  “crying  sissy  children”  while  he  screamed  at  his  spellbound  congregation  like  a  rabid  dog.    Not  even  aware  that  many  in  his  own  congregation  are  now  seeing  through  this  confusion  for  what  it  really  is:  deception.    Because  most  of  his  congregation  are  now  aware  that  William  Branham  copied  “divine  revelations”  from  the  works  of  other  men  and  said  that  “angels  met  him  in  the  room”  to  deliver  these  “revelations,”  Reagan  would  rather  try  to  prove  a  negative,  which  he  knows  is  more  difficult  than  focusing  on  the  real  issue.    The  problem?    To  keep  people  bound  in  a  cult,  he  is  willing  to  forfeit  his  soul  by  preaching  on  fault  with  the  Word  of  God.    And  this  is  the  same  congregation  that  he  preached  sermons  about  the  “Rhema”  to  –  how  only  the  “prophet”  was  able  to  interpret  the  Word  of  God!    “Let’s  confuse  them  on  scripture,  because  I’ve  already  taught  them  not  to  open  it!”    I  have  three  children,  very  good  boys  who  love  Jesus  with  all  their  heart.    One  of  them  has  just  learned  the  “invention  of  lying,”  and  we  have  to  correct  him  now  and  again.    It  is  a  stage  of  growing,  one  that  some  men  never  get  out  of.    Thankfully,  my  children  have  their  hearts  focused  on  Jesus  Christ.    If  one  of  them  were  to  throw  a  baseball  through  a  window,  and  tell  me  that  he  watched  as  a  neighbor  kid  threw  it,  I’d  probably  know  it  was  a  little  fib  before  going  any  further.    But  if  another  one  of  my  boys  were  to  look  at  me  and  to  tell  me:  “Daddy,  he  lied  to  you,  but  that’s  ok  because  the  Bible  has  conflict,”  I  would  end  up  spanking  both  of  them!    Magnify  that.    If  the  son  protecting  the  one  who  told  the  fib  were  getting  paid  several  thousand  dollars  every  Sunday  to  keep  telling  the  fib  over  and  over,  I’d  probably  blow  my  stack!    Both  boys  need  a  good,  old-­‐fashioned  woodshed  experience!    Reagan  went  through  the  scriptures,  nit-­‐picking  the  Word  of  God  like  it  was  some  two-­‐bit  National  Enquirer  magazine.    Because  the  Word  says  in  some  places  that  the  Voice  Paul  heard  said,  “I  am  Jesus,”  and  in  another  place  the  writer  wrote,  “I  am  Jesus  of  Nazareth,”  Reagan  cries  foul.        

Page 2: Response to Donnie Reagan

Response  to  Donnie  Reagan  

Copyright  2013,  www.seekyethetruth.com    2  

He  goes  through  the  Bible,  mentioning  what  he  considers  “conflicts,”  but  leaves  the  congregation  with  no  answers!    But  then  for  the  false  prophet,  he  gives  every  answer!    Is  the  false  prophet  more  valuable  to  Reagan  than  the  Word  of  God?    These  cult  ministers,  like  Donnie  Reagan,  are  aware  that  the  paint  has  started  flaking  off  the  ship,  and  underneath  are  boards  made  of  straw.    They  are  starting  to  let  the  water  in,  and  the  ship  will  inevitably  go  down  –  and  they  are  determined  to  go  down  with  it  to  get  every  last  penny  they  can.    It  is  reported  that  some  Branham  supporters  now  have  offshore  accounts,  and  some  of  the  “charitable  organizations”  are  now  either  closing  down  or  changing  their  status  to  “profitable.”    Oddly  enough,  the  William  Branham  Evangelistic  Association  created  in  Arizona  no  longer  shows  up  as  “charitable,”  even  though  it  was  active  until  recently.    Like  the  Pharisees  of  old,  these  men  are  focused  on  one  thing:    money.    While  they  claim  to  be  following  a  man  who  ‘preached  the  same  message  as  Paul,’  they  are  serving  the  god  of  mammon,  while  Paul  served  Christ.    Paul  says  this  in  2  Corinthians  2:    

But  thanks  be  to  God,  who  in  Christ  always  leads  us  in  triumphal  procession,  and  through  us  spreads  the  fragrance  of  the  knowledge  of  him  everywhere.    For  we  are  the  aroma  of  Christ  to  God  among  those  who  are  being  saved  and  among  those  who  are  perishing,  to  one  a  fragrance  from  death  to  death,  to  the  other  a  fragrance  from  life  to  life.  Who  is  sufficient  for  these  things?    For  we  are  not,  like  so  many,  peddlers  of  God's  word,  but  as  men  of  sincerity,  as  commissioned  by  God,  in  the  sight  of  God  we  speak  in  Christ.    

These  men  are  nothing  more  than  “peddlers  of  god’s  word”  –  and  not  even  the  god  of  the  Bible.    They  are  peddlers  of  William  Branham’s  word,  which  they  call  the  “Voice  of  God.”    They  seem  to  have  sold  their  souls  for  mammon.    The  Word  of  God,  while  having  very  explainable  translation  issues,  should  be  their  Absolute  –  not  the  word  of  man.    One  book,  from  one  writer,  centuries  apart  may  have  minor  conflicts  with  another  writer,  but  the  underlying  principles  remain  exactly  the  same.    This  is  not  the  case  with  William  Branham.    In  1960,  Branham  said  that  “Many  INFIDELS  say,  ‘Jesus  never  did  claim  to  be  the  Son  of  God.’    He  did  there!    He  said,  ‘I  am  He  that  speaks  to  you!”    Later,  he  also  said,  “I’ve  heard  INFIDELS  one  time  told  me  that  Jesus  never  did  say  that  He  was  the  Son  of  God.    He  sure  did!    He  CERTAINLY  did!    You  JUST  DON’T  KNOW  YOUR  BIBLE!”    But  while  one  writer  may  have  remembered  the  story  in  the  Bible  slightly  different,  That  same  writer  does  not  contradict  himself.    He  does  not  vary  even  the  slightest  with  fundamental  doctrines  of  other  writers,  the  Book  flows  in  continuity!        And  they  do  not  call  themselves  “infidels,”  

Page 3: Response to Donnie Reagan

Response  to  Donnie  Reagan  

Copyright  2013,  www.seekyethetruth.com    3  

 Branham,  only  a  few  years  later,  called  himself  an  infidel:    

“Jesus  never  referred  to  Himself  as  the  Son  of  God,  He  always  referred  to  Himself  as  the  Son  of  Man  –  64-­‐0614.  

 He  said  the  very  same  sentence  the  next  month.    What  was  Branham  doing?    He  was  trying  to  deny  the  supreme  deity  of  Christ.        Reagan  said  that  Branham’s  plagiarism  of  other  men  was  because  that  they  had  just  a  “little  truth,”  and  that  even  though  Branham  claimed  that  “angels  from  God”  gave  him  these  stolen  statements  as  “divine  revelation,”  he  was  picking  and  choosing  truth  from  the  works  of  men  before  him.    But  this  time,  denying  the  supreme  deity  of  Christ,  Branham  was  copying  the  theology  of  George  Lamsa,  writer  of  the  Lamsa  Bible  –  a  heretic  who  also  denied  the  supreme  deity  of  Christ.    Lamsa,  twisting  the  words  of  the  true  text,  and  choosing  Gnostic  scrolls,  tried  to  prove  that  Jesus  was  “just  a  prophet,”  like  Mohammed  of  the  Islam  faith.    Branham  believed  him.    Lamsa,  in  the  bible  that  William  Branham  promoted  as  “accurate,”  took  the  dying  words  of  Jesus  Christ  on  the  cross,  “My  God,  My  God,  Why  hast  thou  forsaken  me,”  and  changed  them  to  “My  God,  My  God,  For  this  I  was  spared?”    Did  Branham  really  believe  that  Jesus  Christ  did  not  give  the  atonement?    The  Word  of  God  should  never  be  thrown  into  the  mud  like  Reagan  did  to  keep  his  congregation  confused  into  listening  to  his  false  teaching.    The  Word  of  God  is  a  living,  breathing,  flowing  Book.    Every  word  of  that  Book  is  the  inspired  Word  of  God,  and  is  the  Absolute  Word  of  Truth.    Since  Reagan  has  thrown  his  Bible  in  the  mud,  it  is  evident  that  he  has  stopped  reading  it  in  favor  of  plagiarized  words  that  William  Branham  stole  from  the  likes  of  Charles  Taze  Russell,  cult  leader  of  the  Jehovah’s  witnesses.    Or  Joseph  Smith,  founder  of  the  Mormon  Church.    Or  John  Alexander  Dowie,  who  Branham  lied  about  his  own  birthdate  to  become  the  “Elisha”  to  Dowie’s  Elijah!”    Reagan  claimed  that  Branham  took  the  words  of  Clarence  Larkin,  because  he  was  taking  the  “truths”  and  preaching  it  –  but  he  never  told  you  that  Branham  claimed  that  “angels  met  him”  to  give  him  this  truth.    And  when  Branham  “added”  the  “messengers”  to  Larkin’s  dates  for  the  church  ages,  Branham  chose  one  man  who  was  dead  before  his  “church  age”  ever  began!    Another  died  before  his  “age”  ended!    So  I’d  like  to  read  from  the  Book  that  Reagan  just  threw  in  the  mud:    

In  the  beginning  was  the  Word,  and  the  Word  was  with  God,  and  the  Word  was  God.  He  was  in  the  beginning  with  God.    All  things  were  made  through  him,  and  without  him  was  not  any  thing  made  that  was  made.    In  him  was  life,  and  the  life  was  the  light  of  men.    The  light  shines  in  the  darkness,  and  the  darkness  has  not  overcome  it.  

 

Page 4: Response to Donnie Reagan

Response  to  Donnie  Reagan  

Copyright  2013,  www.seekyethetruth.com    4  

Notice  the  writer  here.    He  doesn’t  say,  “In  days  gone  by,  there  are  many  discrepancies  in  the  Word  and  I’m  going  to  correct  it  through  Gnostic  texts!”    He  says  the  Word  was  EVERYTHING!    

There  was  a  man  sent  from  God,  whose  name  was  John.    He  came  as  a  witness,  to  bear  witness  about  the  light,  that  all  might  believe  through  him.    He  was  not  the  light,  but  came  to  bear  witness  about  the  light.    

Speaking  of  John  the  Baptist,  he  does  not  say,  “A  prophet  of  God  came  to  the  people!    Oh,  he  was  such  a  blessed  soul,  prophesying  about  many  antlers  and  egg-­‐shaped  chariots!”    The  writer  says  that  John  was  just  a  man  –  does  not  even  expand  on  the  great  things  that  John  the  Baptist  likely  did  through  the  power  of  God!    John  was  no  the  focus  as  William  Branham  is,  the  focus  is  coming  next:      

 The  true  light,  which  gives  light  to  everyone,  was  coming  into  the  world.    He  was  in  the  world,  and  the  world  was  made  through  him,  yet  the  world  did  not  know  him.  He  came  to  his  own,  and  his  own  people  did  not  receive  him.        

Let  me  pause  here:    I  hear  your  “message  programming”  kicking  in.    “He  came  to  his  own,  and  his  own  people  did  not  receive  him.”    That’s  exactly  what  they  did  with  William  Branham.    Oh  hallelujah,  the  almighty  prophet.    NO!    This  is  speaking  of  Jesus  Christ!    This  is  not  referring  to  John  the  Baptist!    John  was  not  the  focal  point  as  these  cult  pastors  would  have  you  believe!    There  is  only  one  focal  point:    JESUS!    

But  to  all  who  did  receive  him,  who  believed  in  his  name,  he  gave  the  right  to  become  children  of  God,  who  were  born,  not  of  blood  nor  of  the  will  of  the  flesh  nor  of  the  will  of  man,  but  of  God.    

The  writer  does  not  say,  “All  who  received  John  the  Baptist,  the  “Elijah”  of  Malachi  3  and  4.    The  writer  is  speaking  to  those  who  receive  Jesus.    John  did  not  save  them,  Jesus  did!    No  doubt  there  were  many  who  did  not  even  believe  John  the  Baptist  that  were  saved  by  believing  Jesus  Christ!    But  here’s  the  Good  part:  

 And  the  Word  became  flesh  and  dwelt  among  us,  and  we  have  seen  his  glory,  glory  as  of  the  only  Son  from  the  Father,  full  of  grace  and  truth.      (John  bore  witness  about  him,  and  cried  out,  “This  was  he  of  whom  I  said,  ‘He  who  comes  after  me  ranks  before  me,  because  he  was  before  me.’”)  For  from  his  fullness  we  have  all  received,  grace  upon  grace.    For  the  law  was  given  through  Moses;  grace  and  truth  came  through  Jesus  Christ.    No  one  has  ever  seen  God;  the  only  God,  who  is  at  the  Father's  side,  he  has  made  him  known.    

As  Christians,  we  should  ask  ourselves:    Who  are  we  going  to  listen  to?    A  man  making  money  off  of  people  by  pointing  to  a  false  prophet  that  calls  himself  an  infidel?    A  false  teacher  who  is  willing  to  sell  his  soul  to  the  devil  by  throwing  the  Bible  in  the  mud  to  lift  up  a  false  prophet?    Or  the  Word  of  God  that  is  the  Absolute  word  of  Truth?