Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Response function and Statistical approach
for particle circulation on QUEST
H. Zushi, A. Kuzmin, I. Takagi1), S.K. Sharma2), M. Hasegawa, M. Kobayashi3), T.
Mutoh3),Y. Hirooka3), K. Hanada, A. Fujisawa, H. Idei, K. Nakamura, Y. Nagashima,
T. Onchi, N. Yoshida, S. Kubo3), S. Ide4), N. Ohno5), A. Hatayama6)
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, 816-8580, Japan 1) Kyoto University, 2) IPR India, 3)National Institute for Fusion Science (NIFS), Gifu, Japan,4) Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Ibaraki,5) Nagoya University, 6) Keio University
8th IAEA Technical Meeting on Steady State Operation of
Magnetic Fusion Devices,26-29 May 2015 Nara, Japan
Related presentations
1) Invited talk by Hanada(on 29 May)
2) Poster presentation by Kuzmin(on 27 May)
3) Poster presentation by Hasegawa (on 27 May)
Acknowledgements; S24226020,NIFS13KUTR085,NIFS14KOAR017
Gas balance Analysis in Plasma
2
wrelretwplasmagas
pump
TtqtqANtQP
dt
dP)()()(
a) Langmuir experiment
b) After EBT steady plasma
(104 sec)
DP
DP
c) Retention rate in JET
d) Release rate after termination
JNM2013
NF2013
JNM1981
JNM1980
P(t)
qret(t)
QUEST AFRC
1) PdCu Plasma driven
permeation probe
QUEST and New diagnostics for (qret,qrel)
3
2) He partial pressure
in H-plasma
Monitor the release process
Deduce the retention flux
+ TMAP7
(He shots one week ago)
slab PlasmaTokamak
w/ natural divertor
SUS316 + W coated one (100°C)
QUEST AFRC
8th IAEA TM on SSO
CONTENTS
1) Externally controlled perturbation
methods in ECR plasmas
• Time response function to Gas fueling
• Frequency response function to interaction
region
2) Statistical approach in SSTO plasma
3) Summary
4
1-1) Perturbation of source term
2) Pressure response function in ECR plasma
relHegasHe
retincgasinc
HgasH
plasmawrelretwgas
pump
qdtQtP
qdtQt
dtQtP
NTtqtqAtQP
dt
dP
;)()()(
;)()()(
)()()(
)()()(
22
Understanding of retention and release processes induced by inc and He5
1) Perturbation of Qgas(t) in vacuum
QUEST AFRC
sTHatomsQ
tnTUnTtUQtQgas
1.0sec,405;106.1~
)()()(
20
0
0
D
D
)(tQP
dt
dpgas
pump
Long tail
(release as t-1.1)
1-1-1)Time response function of PH2
In Plasma
In Vacuum
・PH2 in vacuum
・ PH2 in Plasma
Pumping
(2.3 sec)
6
5sec
10sec
40sec
20sec
5sec
10sec
40sec
20sec
QUEST AFRC
Additional Pumping
(4.3 sec)
•Faster decay and higher base pressure
8th IAEA TM on SSO
1-1-2)Gas balance eq. in ECR Plasma
7
RR,RD,DD + trappingmodels
JET & others
Release rate t-0.73
11
1
3432 .gas
pump t
%L
sec.
P)t(Q
sec).(
P
dt
dp
5.0)( tt1.1)( tt
5.1)( tt
QUEST AFRC
),0(),0(2
0
tCKHDtx Hru
x
inc
x
C
1-1-3) Direct measurement of Retention flux
8
QUEST AFRC
PDP Flux
Retention
Flux
fgas=25mHz
32~
D
inc
inc
%10~pdp
pdp
D
Details; Poster by Kuzmin
1-1-4)Response function for retention flux
)exp()(
)()()(
3
pump
t
gasinc
ttt
dQtt
9
T=5,10,20,40secD0.4 sec
11
1
3432 .gas
pump t
%L
sec.
P)t(Q
sec).(
P
dt
dp
~ 7sec
QUEST AFRC
8th IAEA TM on SSO 10
QUEST AFRC
1-1-5) Response function for He pressure
a)
b)
c)
11
1
3432 .gas
pump t
%L
sec.
P)t(Q
sec).(
P
dt
dp
Long Sustainement of He may
be consistent with a long tail
Observations at various fgas
mHzfmplatemR
AwallsideAplatesbottomtopACSA
NTtqtqAtQP
dt
dP
PWI
wwww
plasma
i
wi
reli
reti
wi
gas
pump
33at )8.02.0 (54.029.0
;....., ;, /;,;
)()()(
3210
D
1-2) Perturbation in Ai (interaction region)
2) ECR plasma - Plates interaction was perturbed by sweeping the resonance layer
11
1) Plasma effects include contributions from various PWI regions
QUEST AFRC
PH2 complicated modulation
Is(R,t)
vacuuminPfS
fSfHfS
fSfHfS
HQgasQgas
QgasQgasHeQgasHe
QgasQgasHQgasH
puff :)(
);()()(
);()()(
2
22
1-2-2) Perturbation in Ai (interaction region)1) Frequency response function in ECR plasma by sweeping the resonance layer
12
QUEST AFRC
• Both H(H2) and H(He) shows release components at fPWI=33mHz.
• LF(f<33 mHz) contibutes to a slow gradual rise in both PH2 and PHe
2) In tokamak plasma uncontrable growth
in PH2,PHe,pdp at constant fgas=0.3 Hz
13
1) Both H2 & He response function changes in time,which are affected by enhanced wall release process.2) Both release and retention are enhanced.3) Plasma parameters(SOL /near wall) fluctuate
Puff at every 3s
<PH2>
<PHe>
QUEST AFRC
t
t
)T(f)t(Q
stochastic:)t(
)t()t(P)t(Q)t(P
dt
)t(dP
ervalintgas
gas
pump
events
2-2) Variable Puff interval pattern indicates
"wall recycling state"
14
1) Puff time pattern relates with plasma self-perturbations
QUEST AFRC
Details; Poster by Hasegawa
No puff after 500sec
300 600 sec
Ha
PH2
PHe
2-3)Puff interval vs Release & recycling
Middle phase of discharge End phase of discharge
Although the same amount of H2 is injected, Ha and PH2 are progressed in discharge.He is immediately released from the walls, then decays. 15
QUEST AFRC
2-4 Probability function of Tinterval and
temporal evolution
16
)exp(2
exp)(
)(
/21
1
NCNN
F
dCNNf
tFNNgNddt
dN
Fg
a
0) Response function=> d(NL pumping),g(L release), Q(stochastic force)
1) Steady state pdf
2) Time dependent FP eq.
PDF for steady state FP eq.
QUEST AFRC
Summary• Under controlled perturvation in ECRDC plasmas
response functions are experimentally determined.
1) Fast decay after puff and higher base level in PH2 can
be interpreted by additional wall pumping(0.5xpumps)
and a long tail
2) Contribution of interaction regions to release process
can be decided by position scan
• In tokamak operation "puff interval pattern" is analysed
to study self-growing perturvations in recycling.
17
5/26/2015 8th IAEA TM on SSO
SSTO in QUEST
19
Retention flux
Ha
nl
Temp @ div. plate
PH2
AG below plate
Ptotal at TMPIp
Middle phase of discharge
End phase of discharge
Negative response function evolves
during the SSTO plasma
20
plasmaretrelHout
pump
HH
rr
HH
H
NtqtqtqqtP
dt
tdP
dtqtP
tnTUnTtUqtq
)()()()()(
)exp(,)exp()()(
)()()(
.
222
280
22
02
D
Net negative term
plasmaretrelHout
pump
HH
r
HH
H
NtqtqtqqtP
dt
tdP
dtqtP
tnTUnTtUqtq
)()()()()(
,)exp()()(
)()()(
222
2
022
02
D
2-2)Negative response function is required
to reproduce the H2 perturbations
under the retention dominant conditions
Net negative term21
T=3 sec, D=0.2sec
Response function For He release from walls
Time evolution of the response function
for released He in SSTO H-plasma
22
D
dtqtP
tnTUnTtUqtq
r
HHe
H
)exp()()(
)()()(
2
02
Response function is Characterized by Fast rise and quick decay
Transition from High to Low Recycling
in SSTO w/well conditioned walls H2
HeHa
Phe is used to monitor the release flux from the wallsThis behavior depends on the discharge history
Before the apparent wall saturation
23
4) Rotation sustainmentCo-current toroidal (20km/s)&
ion diamagnetic poloidal (1km/s)flows
Fully NI plasma sustained by FB control
of recycling flux
Two shots (for rotation measurements) are presented.
Puff width(amount of H2) is fixed, the repetition frequency is FB controlled
to keep Ha constant24
Global gas balance in SSTO
25
Transition from High to Low Recycling
in SSTO w/well conditioned walls
H2
He
Ha
Phe is used to monitor the release flux from the wallsThis behavior depends on the discharge history
Before the apparent wall saturation
26
Stochastic Differential EquationSDE
221
21
2
211
,
02
1),(
),()()(
xFFdt
dxVNLxLx
dt
dxM
fdt
dx
xf
dt
dx
xt
txf
txtxNLxLdt
tdx
n
n
(s)
s
,exp2
exp)( 11/2xxx
nF
NLCxxf
snFLst
27
Stationary pdf f(n): gamma distribution is a plausible pdf
Fd<; amplitude of stochasiticity
1) Quasi Steady ECR Plasmas
(release dominant)
28
Ha
nl
PH2
Is(Top plate)
PH2
Ha
nl
ECR plasma
Wall release dominant conditionPuff at every 40 sec
Wall retention dominant conditionPuff is controlled to keep Ha const.
Vacuum
QUEST AFRC
plasmaretrelHout
pump
HH
out
r
HH
H
NtqtqtqqtP
dt
tdP
constq
dtqtP
tnTUnTtUqtq
)()()()()(
.
,)exp()()(
)()()(
.
222
5122
02
1
D
29
Vacuum(p=2.3sec
Plasma
1-2) Response functions of H2 pressure
w/ and w/o ECR-plasma
(T=40sec, D0.7 sec)
(=2.3sec in vacuum0.57 sec in ECR plasma)
Vacuum
Net positive term
Plasma
QUEST AFRC
2) Response functions of H2 pressure
w/ and w/o SSTO-plasma
(Retention dominant condition)
Symbols: measured data pointsLines: calculations from response functions
Small response of H2 for the same puff as that in vacuum
H2 is severely retained into the walls under the well wall-conditioned SSTO plasma
Vacuum(p=2.3sec
30
31
2) Quasi Steady ECR Plasmas
(retention dominant condition) QUEST AFRC
Vacuum